RESUMEN

Multiple glioblastomas (GBMs) are aggressive, malignant, and sporadic brain tumors. We present the case of a 58-year-old patient with two GBMs in the right frontal lobe and associated edema. The patient presented with sudden left limb weakness accompanied by abnormal gait for five consecutive days. Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRg-LITT), a minimally invasive technique that disperses thermal energy was used to cauterize the deep-seated brain lesions. Following two sessions of MRg-LITT, the patient showed full remission from symptoms. However, the disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) induced vasogenic edema surrounding the necrotic GBMs. Post-operative nine-month MRI images revealed severe vasogenic edema and compression on the ventricles, shifting the midline toward the left side. Therefore the patient underwent an emergency craniectomy and continues to live with close follow-ups. Here, we established that LITT procedures were effective in cauterizing GBMs with no recurrence.

RESUMEN

MR-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive neurosurgical technique increasingly used for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy and brain tumors. Utilizing near-infrared light energy delivery guided by real-time MRI thermometry, MRgLITT enables precise ablation of targeted brain tissues, resulting in limited corridor-related morbidity and expedited postoperative recovery. Since receiving CE marking in 2018, the adoption of MRgLITT has expanded to more than 40 neurosurgical centers across Europe. In epilepsy treatment, MRgLITT can be applied to various types of focal lesional epilepsy, including mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, hypothalamic hamartoma, focal cortical dysplasias, periventricular heterotopias, cavernous malformations, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNET), low-grade gliomas, tuberous sclerosis, and in disconnective surgeries. In neuro-oncology, MRgLITT is used for treating newly diagnosed and recurrent primary brain tumors, brain metastases, and radiation necrosis. This comprehensive review presents an overview of the current evidence and technical considerations for the use of MRgLITT in treating various pathologies associated with drug-resistant epilepsy and brain tumors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of robot-assisted laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is emerging as a viable treatment option for brain tumors in patients aged 80-90 years (octogenarians). Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to describe the clinical feasibility of octogenarians undergoing LITT procedure for brain tumors at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all robot-assisted LITT procedures performed at our institution between 2013 and 2023 for octogenarians. Comparison of continuous variables was by Student t tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 20 of 311 (6%) LITT patients in the search cohort were octogenarians. Mean age was 82.6 years (range, 80.1-88.0 years) with 13 (65%) female patients. Brain tumor lesions most commonly were located on the left side (65%), and, for ablation, all were single trajectories with mean number of 2.3 ablations. No operative complications were seen during hospitalization, with mean length of stay of 1.6 days and most common disposition destination being home (95%). There were no 30- or 90-day readmissions or emergency department presentations. Mean follow-up was 12.4 months without any complications in that time. The most common pathology in our cohort was glioblastoma (55%). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted LITT is a safe and effective treatment option for brain tumors in octogenarians with a very low morbidity risk. Therefore, further investigation is required to understand how LITT can translate to therapeutic benefit in patients aged over 80 years old with brain tumors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Hypothalamic hamartomas are congenital lesions of the hypothalamus, with a range of symptoms defined by lesion location. Common presenting symptoms include gelastic seizures and precocious puberty. When hamartoma-related seizures become resistant to medications, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been shown to be an effective treatment. The authors present a case of robot-assisted LITT for a patient with an 11-year history of epilepsy due to hypothalamic hamartoma. In addition, they demonstrate the use of a stereotactic biopsy needle implemented during the procedure for possible biopsy of deep cranial lesions. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2024.4.FOCVID2415.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) was previously studied in brain metastasis that recurs locally after initial radiosurgery (BMRS). Here, we characterize the clinical outcome of LITT-cSRS in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2023, ten consecutive cancer patients with newly diagnosed brain mass of unclear etiology who underwent stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) and LITT in the same setting followed by consolidation SRS (cSRS) with > 6 months follow-up were identified retrospectively. Clinical and imaging outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The histology of the BM were: breast cancer (n = 3), melanoma (n = 3), non-cell cell lung cancer (n = 3), colon (n = 1). There were no wound or procedural complications. All patients were discharged home, with a median one-day hospital stay (range: 1-2 days). All patients were off corticosteroid therapy by the one-month follow-up. cSRS were carried out 12-27 days (median of 19 days) after SNB + LITT. There were no subsequent emergency room presentation, 30-day or 90-day re-admission. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) remains stable or improved at the 3 months-follow-up. With a median follow-up of 416 days (13.8 mo; range: 199-1,096 days), there was one local recurrence at 384 days (12.8 mo) post-LITT-cSRS. With exception of this patient with local recurrence, all patients showed decreased FLAIR volume surrounding the LITT-cSRS treated BMRS by the six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: To our awareness, this case series represent the first to describe LITT-cSRS in the setting of newly diagnosed BM. The results presented here provide pilot data to support the safety and efficacy of LITT-cSRS and lay the foundation for future studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Although primary studies have reported the safety and efficacy of LITT as a primary treatment in glioma, they are limited by sample sizes and institutional variation in stereotactic parameters such as temperature and laser power. The current literature has yet to provide pooled statistics on outcomes solely for primary brain tumors according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5). In the present study, we identify recent articles on primary CNS neoplasms treated with LITT without prior intervention, focusing on relationships with molecular profile, PFS, and OS. This meta-analysis includes the extraction of data from primary sources across four databases using the Covidence systematic review manager. The pooled data suggest LITT may be a safe primary management option with tumor ablation rates of 94.8% and 84.6% in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and IDH-mutant astrocytoma, respectively. For IDH-wildtype GBM, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.0 and 9.0 months, respectively. Similar to rates reported in the prior literature, the neurologic and non-neurologic complication rates for IDH-wildtype GBM were 10.3% and 4.8%, respectively. The neurologic and non-neurologic complication rates were somewhat higher in the IDH-mutant astrocytoma cohort at 33% and 8.3%, likely due to a smaller cohort size.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Insular gliomas pose a significant surgical challenge due to the complex surrounding functional and vascular anatomy. The authors report their experience using a novel framework for the treatment of insular gliomas with laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and provide representative case examples emphasizing indications, rationale, and technical pearls. METHODS: A prospectively gathered institutional database was used to identify patients with newly diagnosed insular gliomas who underwent LITT between 2015 and 2023. The proposed framework of insular glioma management is guided by tumor size and extent of extra-insular tumor involvement. Patients with tumors localized to the insula (insula-only) were treated with single-session or staged LITT. Patients with insular tumors with frontotemporal involvement (insular+) were treated with insular LITT and standard frontotemporal resection of extra-insular tumor. Clinical and volumetric lesional characteristics were analyzed, with particular emphasis on extent of cytoreductive treatment and safety. RESULTS: Of the 261 patients treated at the authors' institution with LITT between 2015 and 2023, 33 LITT procedures were identified involving 22 unique patients with treatment-naive insular gliomas. Of the 22 patients, 12 had insular-only tumors and were treated with LITT alone, while 10 patients had insular+ lesions and were treated with LITT and resection. The median tumor volume for insular-only tumors was 13.4 cm3 (IQR 10.6, 26.3 cm3), with a median extent of treatment of 100% (IQR 92.1%, 100%). Insular+ lesions were significantly larger, with a median volume of 81.2 cm3 (IQR 51.9, 97 cm3) and median extent of treatment of 96.6% (IQR 93.7%, 100%). All patients with insular-only tumors were discharged the day after ablation, while insular+ patients had significantly longer hospital stays, with 50% staying more than 3 days. Overall, 8% of insular-only patients had permanent neurological deficits compared with 33% of insular+ patients. Two patients' tumors progressed during follow-up: one patient with WHO grade 4 astrocytoma and the other with diffuse glioma not otherwise specified. Patients with grade 4 tumors had the highest rate of permanent neurological deficit (43%) and a larger decline in postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The authors present their experience using a novel insular glioma treatment paradigm that incorporates LITT into the broader framework of insular glioma surgery. Their findings suggest that insular LITT is feasible and may allow for high rates of cytoreduction while potentially ameliorating the risks of conventional insular glioma surgery.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Real-time MRI-guided focused laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment choice for challenging intracranial lesions that are either resistant to conventional therapies or located in deep or critical areas of the brain. However, existing studies on LITT within surgical neuro-oncology are relatively small and have limited follow-up periods. The authors aimed to present a comprehensive analysis of their experiences with LITT in surgical neuro-oncology, with the intent to provide a clearer understanding of the safety and efficacy of this procedure. METHODS: This study was an exploratory cohort analysis encompassing all patients who underwent LITT for brain tumors at a single center between 2013 and 2023. The primary focus was extent of ablation (EOA), time to recurrence (TTR), and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes, including the rate of complications, were also evaluated. Comparative analyses were conducted based on lesion subtypes, and factors predicting outcomes were identified. RESULTS: Three hundred thirteen patients underwent LITT procedures. During a mean follow-up of 10.4 months, 66.8% of patients remained alive and 26.2% of the ablated lesions recurred. The mean age of the cohort was 60.4 ± 13.3 years (58.5% female). The lesion subtypes that were treated comprised metastases (30%), glioblastoma (GBM; 41.6%), low-grade glioma (9.1%), radiation necrosis (11.4%), and meningioma (2.2%). The permanent neurological deficit rate was 14% (n = 44), with 25 (8%) of them new-onset deficits and 19 deficits (6.1%) that were present preoperatively and did not resolve after LITT. The mean TTR and OS were 12.2 and 38.1 months, respectively. TTR and OS varied significantly by lesion subtype (p < 0.001, log-rank analysis). A high-grade lesion was identified as the single factor linked to tumor recurrence. Age, high-grade lesion, preoperative lesion volume, and readmission within 30 days were identified as factors significantly associated with OS in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. EOA > 100% predicted longer OS in metastases and GBM by log-rank analysis. CONCLUSIONS: LITT stands as a secure and feasible ablative treatment choice for intracranial lesions, potentially suitable for specific patient cases otherwise not amenable to surgical intervention. These findings further corroborate the safety of the procedure and its favorable outcomes, underscoring its potential significance in clinical practice.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of brain tumors has developed over time, offering customized strategies for patients and their specific lesions. One of the most recent advances in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery is laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). However, its effectiveness and indications are still being evaluated. The aim of this work is to review the current literature on LITT for pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) and evaluate our initial results in this context. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our pediatric neurosurgery database for patients who received LITT treatment between November 2019 and December 2023. We collected data on the indications for LITT, technical issues during the procedure, and clinical and radiological follow-up. RESULTS: Three patients underwent 5 LITT procedures for pLGG. The lesion was thalamo-peduncular in one patient, cingulate in one, and deep parietal in one patient. Two patients had a previous open resection done and were diagnosed with pLGG. One patient underwent a stereotaxic biopsy during the LITT procedure that was non-diagnostic. The same patient underwent a later open resection of the tumor in the cingulate gyrus. There were no surgical complications and all patients were discharged home on the first post-operative day. The follow-up period was between 20 and 40 months. Radiological follow-up showed a progressive reduction of the tumor in patients with LGG. CONCLUSION: Laser interstitial thermal therapy is a minimally invasive treatment that shows promise in treating deep-seated pLGG in children. The treatment has demonstrated a reduction in tumor volume, and the positive results continue over time. LITT can be used as an alternative treatment for tumors located in areas that are difficult to access surgically or in cases where other standard treatment options have failed.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an alternative to anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy that has been found by some to have a lower procedure cost but is generally regarded as less effective and sometimes results in a subsequent procedure. The goal of this study is to incorporate subsequent procedures into the cost and outcome comparison between ATL and LITT. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study includes 85 patients undergoing ATL or LITT for temporal lobe epilepsy during the period September 2015 to December 2022. Of the 40 patients undergoing LITT, 35 % (N = 14) underwent a subsequent ATL. An economic cost model is derived, and difference in means tests are used to compare the costs, outcomes, and other hospitalization measures. RESULTS: Our model predicts that whenever the percentage of LITT patients undergoing subsequent ATL (35% in our sample) exceeds the percentage by which the LITT procedure alone is less costly than ATL (7.2% using total patient charges), LITT will have higher average patient cost than ATL, and this is indeed the case in our sample. After accounting for subsequent surgeries, the average patient charge in the LITT sample ($103,700) was significantly higher than for the ATL sample ($88,548). A second statistical comparison derived from our model adjusts for the difference in effectiveness by calculating the cost per seizure-free patient outcome, which is $108,226 for ATL, $304,052 for LITT only, and $196,484 for LITT after accounting for the subsequent ATL surgeries. SIGNIFICANCE: After accounting for the costs of subsequent procedures, we found in our cohort that LITT is not only less effective but also results in higher average costs per patient than ATL as a first course of treatment. While cost and effectiveness rates will vary across centers, we also provide a model for calculating cost effectiveness based on individual center data.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an emerging role for minimally invasive magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) in the treatment of pediatric epilepsy refractory to medication. To date, predictors of MRgLITT success have not been established in a sizeable singular experience. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to elucidate if previous surgical history predicts MRgLITT success in this setting. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of our MRgLITT procedures for pediatric (patient age <19 years) epilepsy from 2011 to 2020 with documented seizure outcomes at 1 and 2 years after procedure. Categorical and continuous data were compared using χ2 and Student's t test, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients satisfied all criteria with 16 (39%) female and 25 (61%) male patients. Following MRgLITT, seizure-freedom at 1-year was achieved in 15 (37%) patients. In the cohort, there were 14 (34%) patients who had undergone previous open surgery for epilepsy at mean age of 9.4 ± 5.5 years. Patients with a previous open surgery history were found to statistically experience longer length of hospitalization after MRgLITT (P = 0.04) with a statistically lower proportion of seizure-freedom at 1-year after MRgLITT (14% vs. 48%, P = 0.03). However, there was no difference in the rate of seizure-freedom at 2 years (29% vs. 41%, P = 0.44), as well as no difference in subsequent surgical interventions for seizure management between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our institutional experience, patients with previous open surgery history may experience longer length of hospitalization after MRgLITT for pediatric epilepsy and lesser response in seizure-freedom within the first year but with non-inferior seizure freedom by the second year.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is popular for treating brain tumours and epilepsy. The strict control of tissue thermal damage extent is crucial for LITT. Temperature prediction is useful for predicting thermal damage extent. Accurately predictingin vivobrain tissue temperature is challenging due to the temperature dependence and the individual variations in tissue properties. Considering these factors is essential for improving the temperature prediction accuracy.Objective. To present a method for predicting patient-specific tissue temperature distribution within a target lesion area in the brain during LITT.Approach. A magnetic resonance temperature imaging (MRTI) data-driven estimation model was constructed and combined with a modified Pennes bioheat transfer equation (PBHE) to predict patient-specific temperature distribution. In the PBHE for temperature prediction, the individual specificity and temperature dependence of thermal tissue properties and blood perfusion, as well as the individual specificity of optical tissue properties were considered. Only MRTI data during one laser irradiation were required in the method. This enables the prediction of patient-specific temperature distribution and the resulting thermal damage region for subsequent ablations.Main results. Patient-specific temperature prediction was evaluated based on clinical data acquired during LITT in the brain, using intraoperative MRTI data as the reference standard. Our method significantly improved the prediction performance of temperature distribution and thermal damage region. The average root mean square error was decreased by 69.54%, the average intraclass correlation coefficient was increased by 37.5%, the average Dice similarity coefficient was increased by 43.14% for thermal damage region prediction.Significance. The proposed method can predict temperature distribution and thermal damage region at an individual patient level during LITT, providing a promising approach to assist in patient-specific treatment planning for LITT in the brain.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: Epilepsy patients with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) on imaging who are drug-resistant usually undergo epilepsy surgery without previous invasive evaluation. However, up to one-third of patients are not seizure-free after surgery. Prior studies have identified risk factors for surgical failure, but it is unclear if they are associated with bilateral or discordant seizure onset. Methods: In this retrospective case series, we identified 17 epilepsy patients who had MRI-confirmed MTS but received invasive stereo-EEG (SEEG) evaluation before definitive intervention. We analyzed their presurgical risk factors in relation to SEEG seizure onset localization and MRI/SEEG concordance. Results: SEEG ictal onset was concordant with MTS localization (i.e. seizures started only from the hippocampus with MTS) in 5 out of 13 patients with unilateral MTS (UMTS) and in 3 out of 4 patients with bilateral MTS.No statistically significant association regarding concordance of SEEG ictal onset and MTS location was found in patients with such risk factors as a history of non-mesial temporal aura, frequent focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, prior viral brain infection, or family history of epilepsy. Nine out of 13 UMTS patients had resective surgery only, 5 out of 9 (56 %) have Engel class I outcome at most recent follow-up (median 46.5 months, range 22-91 months). In Engel class I cohort, the SEEG ictal onset was concordant with MTS location in 3 out of 5 patients, and 2 patients had ipsilateral temporal neocortical ictal onset. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with MTS might have discordant SEEG ictal onset (in 61.5% patients with UMTS in presented cohort), which may explain poor surgical outcome after destructive surgery in these cases. Significance: Although no statistically significant association was found in this under-powered study, these findings could be potentially valuable for future meta-analyses.

RESUMEN

The field of medicine is constantly advancing to improve patient care. As physicians, we must improve our knowledge by listening, reading, and practicing evidence-based medicine. Laser treatment has evolved over the years in many surgical specialties. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), also known as stereotactic laser ablation (SLA), was developed in neurosurgical procedures to treat recurrent or metastatic brain tumors, radiation necrosis, and epilepsy lesions. LITT procedures are advantageous in providing better patient outcomes, decreased hospital length of stay, and reduced total hospital cost. These procedures are performed as a multi-disciplinary approach; this article discusses the different types of LITT systems, indications, contraindications, types of anesthesia, perioperative anesthetic management, safety precautions, complications, recovery during and after LITT procedures, and the future of LITT procedures.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For patients with medically refractory epilepsy, newer minimally invasive techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) have been developed in recent years. This study aims to characterize trends in the utilization of surgical resection versus LITT to treat medically refractory epilepsy, characterize complications, and understand the cost of this innovative technique to the public. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for all patients admitted with a diagnosis of medically refractory epilepsy. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, complications, and costs were tabulated for all patients who underwent LITT or surgical resection within these cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 6019 patients were included, 223 underwent LITT procedures, while 5796 underwent resection. Significant predictors of increased patient charges for both cohorts included diabetes (odds ratio: 1.7, confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-2.19), infection (odds ratio: 5.12, CI 2.73-9.58), and hemorrhage (odds ratio: 2.95, CI 2.04-4.12). Procedures performed at nonteaching hospitals had 1.54 greater odds (CI 1.02-2.33) of resulting in a complication compared to teaching hospitals. Insurance status did significantly differ (P = 0.001) between those receiving LITT (23.3% Medicare; 25.6% Medicaid; 44.4% private insurance; 6.7 Other) and those undergoing resection (35.3% Medicare; 22.5% Medicaid; 34.7% private Insurance; 7.5% other). When adjusting for patient demographics, LITT patients had shorter length of stay (2.3 vs. 8.9 days, P < 0.001), lower complication rate (1.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.385), and lower mean hospital ($139,412.79 vs. $233,120.99, P < 0.001) and patient ($55,394.34 vs. $37,756.66, P < 0.001) costs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights LITT's advantages through its association with lower costs and shorter length of stay. The present study also highlights the associated predictors of LITT versus resection, such as that most LITT cases happen at academic centers for patients with private insurance. As the adoption of LITT continues, more data will become available to further understand these issues.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With continued evolution in stereotactic techniques and an expanding armamentarium of surgical therapeutic options, non-craniotomy stereotactic procedures in neuro-oncology are becoming increasingly complex, often requiring multi-trajectory approaches. Here we demonstrate that the ClearPoint SmartFrame Array (Solana Beach, California, USA), a second-generation magnetic resonance imaging-compatible stereotactic frame, supports such non-craniotomy, multi-trajectory (NCMT) stereotactic procedures. METHODS: We previously published case reports demonstrating the feasibility of NCMT through the ClearPoint SmartFrame Array. Here we prospectively followed the next 10 consecutive patients who underwent such multi-trajectory procedures to further establish procedural safety and clinical utility. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent complex, multi-trajectory stereotactic procedures, including combinations of needle biopsy ± cyst drainage and laser interstitial thermal therapy targeting geographically distinct regions of neoplastic lesions under the same anesthetic event. The median maximal radial error of stereotaxis was 1.0 mm. In all cases, definitive diagnosis was achieved, and >90% of the intended targets were ablated. The average stereotaxis time for the multi-trajectory procedure was 119 ± 22.2 minutes, comparing favorably to our previously published results of single-trajectory procedures (80 ± 9.59 minutes, P = 0.125). There were no procedural complications. Post-procedure, the neurologic condition of 1 patient improved, while the remaining 9 patients remained stable. All patients were discharged home, with a median hospital stay of 1 day (range: 1-12 days). With a median follow-up of 376 days (range: 155-1438 days), there were no 30-day readmissions or wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Geographically distinct regions of brain cancer can be safely and accurately accessed through the ClearPoint Array frame in NCMT stereotactic procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify baseline clinical and radiological characteristics of brain metastases (BMs) associated with a higher probability of lesion-specific progression-free survival (PFS-L) after laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). METHODS: A total of 47 lesions in 42 patients with BMs treated with LITT were retrospectively examined, including newly diagnosed BM, suspected recurrent BM, and suspected radiation necrosis. The association of baseline clinical and radiological features with PFS-L was assessed using survival analyses. Radiological features included lesion size measurements, diffusion and perfusion metrics, and sphericity, which is a radiomic feature ranging from 1 (perfect sphere) to 0. RESULTS: The probability of PFS-L for the entire cohort was 88.0% at 3 months, 70.6% at 6 months, 67.4% at 1 and 2 years, and 62.2% at 3 years. For lesions progressing after LITT (n = 13), the median time to progression was 3.9 months, and most lesions (n = 11) progressed within 6 months after LITT. In lesions showing response to LITT (n = 17), the median time to response was 12.1 months. All 3 newly diagnosed BMs showed a long-term response. The mean (± SD) follow-up duration for all censored lesions (n = 34) was 20.7 ± 19.4 months (range 12 days to 6.1 years). The mean pretreatment enhancing volume was 2.68 cm3 and the mean sphericity was 0.70. Pretreatment small enhancing volume (p = 0.003) and high sphericity (p = 0.024) computed from lesion segmentation predicted a longer PFS-L after LITT. Lesions meeting optimal cutoffs of either enhancing volume < 2.5 cm3 (adjusted p = 0.004) or sphericity ≥ 0.705 (adjusted p = 0.019) had longer PFS-L, and their probability of PFS-L was 86.8% at 3 years. Lesions meeting both cutoffs showed a cumulative benefit (p < 0.0001), with a 100% probability of PFS-L at 3 years, which was unchanged at the end of follow-up (4.1 years). Manually computed estimates of lesion size (maximal axial diameter, p = 0.011) and sphericity (p = 0.043) were also predictors of PFS-L. Optimal cutoffs of diameter < 2 cm (adjusted p = 0.035) or manual sphericity ≥ 0.91 (adjusted p = 0.092) identified lesions with longer PFS-L, and lesions meeting both cutoffs showed a cumulative benefit (p = 0.0023). Baseline diffusion imaging did not predict PFS-L. A subset of lesions (n = 7) with highly perfused hotspots had worse PFS-L (adjusted p = 0.010), but perfusion signal contamination from vessels and cortex and underlying size differences were possible confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Small size and high sphericity are ideal baseline features for lesions considered for LITT treatment, with a cumulative PFS-L benefit when both features are present, that could aid patient selection.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Corpus callosotomy (CC) is used to reduce seizures, primarily in patients with generalized drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The invasive nature of the procedure contributes to underutilization despite its potential superiority to other palliative procedures. The goal of this study was to use a multi-institutional epilepsy surgery database to characterize the use of CC across participating centers. METHODS: Data were acquired from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Surgery Database, a prospective observational study collecting data on children 0-18 years referred for surgical evaluation of DRE across 22 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers. Patient, epilepsy, and surgical characteristics were collected across multiple CC modalities. Outcomes and complications were recorded and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients undergoing 85 CC procedures at 14 participating epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. Mean age at seizure onset was 2.3 years (0-9.4); mean age for Phase I evaluation and surgical intervention were 9.45 (.1-20) and 10.46 (.2-20.6) years, respectively. Generalized seizure types were the most common (59%). Complete CC was performed in 88%. The majority of CC procedures (57%) were via open craniotomy, followed by laser interstitial thermal therapy (LiTT) (20%) and mini-craniotomy/endoscopic (mc/e) (22%). Mean operative times were significantly longer for LiTT, whereas mean estimated blood loss was greater in open cases. Complications occurred in 11 cases (13%) and differed significantly between surgical techniques (p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in length of postoperative stay across approaches. Mean follow-up was 12.8 months (range 1-39). Favorable Engel outcomes were experienced by 37 (78.7%) of the patients who underwent craniotomy, 10 (58.8%) with LiTT, and 12 (63.2%) with mc/e; these differences were not statistically significant. SIGNIFICANCE: CC is an effective surgical modality for children with DRE. Regardless of surgical modality, complication rates are acceptable and seizure outcomes generally favorable. Newer, less-invasive, surgical approaches may lead to increased adoption of this efficacious therapeutic option for pediatric DRE.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs) are WHO grade 1 tumors associated with tuberous sclerosis that classically arise from the ventricular wall near the caudate groove and foramen of Monro. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical technique, which works by heating a stereotactically placed laser fiber to ablative temperatures under MRI thermometry monitoring. In this paper, the authors present LITT as a surgical alternative to open resection of SEGAs. METHODS: Twelve patients with SEGAs who underwent 16 procedures between 2007 and 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. These patients underwent either open resection or LITT. Clinical data, imaging, recurrence rate, further treatments, and related complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 16 procedures, 9 were open resection and 7 were LITT. An external ventricular drain was placed in 66% (6/9) of open procedures and 57.1% (4/7) of LITT cases. A septostomy was performed in 56% (5/9) of open procedures and 29% (2/7) of LITT cases. Complication rates were higher in open cases than in LITT procedures (44% vs 0%, p < 0.05). Complications included hydrocephalus, transient venous ischemia, wound infection, and bone flap migration. The median length of hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 3.3-5.5 days) for open cases and 4 days (IQR 3.0-7.0 days) for LITT procedures. Recurrence or progression occurred after 3 open cases and 2 LITT cases (33% vs 33%, p = 0.803). For the recurrences, 2 open cases underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, 1 open case underwent LITT, and 1 LITT case underwent repeat LITT. Among the LITT cases, only the patients with no decrease in tumor size by 6 months experienced tumor progression afterward. The 2 LITT cases with progression were the only ones with calcification present on preoperative imaging. The median follow-up times for cases assessed for progression were 8.4 years (IQR 3.8-14.4 years) for open resection and 3.9 years (IQR 3.4-5.1 years) for LITT. CONCLUSIONS: The small size of this case series limits generalizability or adequate comparison of safety. However, this series adds to the literature supporting LITT as a less invasive surgical alternative to open resection of SEGAs and demonstrates that LITT has similar recurrence and/or progression rates to open resection. Additional studies with more data are necessary for comprehensive comparisons between open resection and LITT for treating SEGA.

Asunto(s)