RESUMEN

Introduction: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a commonly affected knee ligament prone to frequent injuries. Henceforth, we aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of lever sign test in Acute and chronic ACL injuries. Method: At the institution's initial outpatient visit, 150 consecutive patients (92 males and 58 females) were evaluated. Total 108 patients had injury in their right leg, whereas 42 had injury in their left leg. Based on time since injury, the patients were divided into Acute and chronic groups. Clinical examinations (lachman's test and lelli's test) of all patients were confirmed with arthroscopic findings and compared between the two groups. Results: In the acute ACL injury, the lever test had a kappa value 0.704. The accuracy and sensitivity of the Lachman, anterior drawer, pivot shift, and lever tests were calculated. We found that the lever test had the highest accuracy and sensitivity (85.48 %, 91.18 %) than the rest. In the chronic ACL injury, the kappa value for the results of the Lachman test evaluation was 0.723. The chronic ACL injuries accuracy and sensitivity values for the Lachman (86.36 %, 91.67 %), anterior drawer (76.14 %, 81.25 %), pivot shift (55.68 %, 58.49 %), and lever tests were determined. Conclusion: The lever sign test is more accurate and reliable in the acute ACL injuries, while the Lachman test is more accurate and reliable in the chronic ACL injuries.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sports-related ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) injuries are frequent. Successful management requires early diagnosis and treatment. One of the clinical tests used to identify ACL damage is the lever sign test. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the lever sign test's diagnostic efficacy for ACL injuries. METHODS: An extensive investigation of the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases was conducted until April 2023. Studies assessing the lever sign test's diagnostic efficacy for ACL injuries were also included. A bivariate random-effects model was employed to acquire the pooled estimates of diagnostic odds ratios, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and curves of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC). RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised twelve investigations with a total of 1365 individuals. The lever sign test's combined sensitivity and specificity for the purpose of diagnosing injuries to the ACL were 0.810 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.686-0.893) and 0.784 (95% CI 0.583-0.904), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.148 (95% CI 1.784-5.553) and 0.210 (95% CI 0.084-0.528), respectively. The study revealed a diagnostic odds ratio of 17.656, with a 95% CI ranging from 4.800 to 64.951. The SROC curve's area was determined to be 0.912 (95% CI 0.857-0.967). CONCLUSION: With high specificity and sensitivity, the lever sign test is a reliable diagnostic modality for ACL injuries. However, the test should be used in combination with other diagnostic tests to increase the accuracy of the diagnosis. Further investigations are warranted to assess the clinical practicability of the lever sign test in various populations and settings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common knee injuries among active and younger patients. The Lever Sign Test (LST) is a relatively newer test, of which the accuracy is disputed in the existing literature. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy with and without anesthesia of the Lever Sign test in the literature. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed, studies were identified using PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar. All studies that reported accuracy of LST performed by a clinical professional were included. Integrity of ACL was confirmed using magnetic resonance imaging or arthroscopy. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using uni- and bivariate methods. RESULTS: After inclusion, 3299 observations in 2516 patients were included from 23 studies. Mean age was 31.8 years and 64.2% were male. Without anesthesia, sensitivity was 79.2% (95% CI 68.7-86.9) and specificity was 92.0% (95% CI 82.2-96.6). An area under the curve (AUC) of 86.1% was found. With anesthesia, sensitivity was 86.6% (95% CI 68.0-95.2), specificity was 93.4% (95% CI 84.5-97.3) and the AUC was 91.6%. CONCLUSION: The Lever Sign test shows very good to excellent accuracy for ACL injury, and is a useful tool for clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in sports are frequent in children and young adults participating in sporting activities involving rotational and pivoting movements. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate diagnostic tool to detect an ACL tear. There are, however, a number of specialized tests available to assess ACL competency. Hypothesis: A novel test was described with extremely high clinical accuracy. The purpose of this study was to assess its clinical accuracy when performed by non-orthopedic providers, such as medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was adopted, and two patients with an MRI-proven complete ACL tear were selected. One patient was thin, and the other was overweight, and both were examined by 100 medical students for both the injured and uninjured knee. The results for these exams were recorded, and a statistical analysis of the screening test was done to evaluate the new special test. Results: Our results were different from the ones found in the literature: we found the test to have a significantly lower performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios compared to the literature numbers. Conclusion: The Lever sign (Lelli's) test loses clinical credibility and significance when performed by non-orthopedic providers or doctors, such as medical students in our study.

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Lever Sign test (LST) for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. Methods: This prospective trial was conducted from January to December 2020. A total of 73 patients, aged 18 to 65 years, presenting with chief complaint as acute knee pain rated < 7/10 on a verbal numerical rating scale, having a minimum 20 to 120° range of motion and undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled. Detailed history, physical examination and standard radiographic evaluation were done in all subjects. For the assessment of the integrity of the ACL, the anterior drawer, Lachman, pivot-shift and LST were performed on each symptomatic knee by a senior orthopedic consultant with a minimum five years post-fellowship experience. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of the LST were recorded with respect to standard reference MRI findings. Results: Out of a total of 73 patients, there were 49 (67.1%) males. Mean age was noted to be 34.5±8.1 years. Area of residence was rural among 42 (57.5%) patients. Mean time since injury was noted to be 11.2±4.6 months. The MRI findings showed ACL intact among 31 (42.4%) patients while it showed ACL torn among 42 (57.5%) patients. The LST showed positive findings for ACL rupture in 39 (53.5%) patients while it was negative in remaining 34 (46.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of LST with respect to standard reference finding (MRI) was found to be 86%, 90%, 92%, 82% and 88% respectively. Conclusion: The LST was found to have good specificity, sensitivity, PPV, NPV and accuracy to detect the status of the ACL. The LST is easy to perform can be used along with other standard assessment techniques to further increase the validation of the status of the ACL diagnosis.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is based on 3 tests: anterior drawer, pivot shift and Lachman. The latter is the most commonly used test. The "lever sign" is a new clinical test that was first described by Lelli et al. in 2014. The primary objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of the lever sign test for the clinical diagnosis of ACL tears, in the primary care setting of patients with acute knee injuries. Primary care being the first point of contact between patients and the healthcare system (general practitioners in this study). The secondary objective was to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of the lever sign test, by comparing it to the PPV of the Lachman test and its sensitivity. The working hypothesis was that the sensitivity of the lever sign test was equal to or greater than 80%. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients with ski-related knee injuries which occurred in French ski resorts between December 1, 2019, and March 15, 2020. The Lachman test and the lever sign test were performed by 36 mountain physicians and were compared to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The lever sign test involved placing a closed fist under the patient's calf in the supine position and applying downward pressure over the quadriceps. Depending on whether the ACL was intact or not, the patient's heel would either rise off the examination table or remain still. This study included 258 patients: 190 women and 68 men. RESULTS: The MRIs found 219 ACL tears and 36 intact ACLs. Three MRIs were deemed uninterpretable. The sensitivity of the lever sign test was 61.2% and the PPV was 83.8%. The sensitivity of the Lachman test was 99.1% and the PPV was 86.5%. CONCLUSION: This study determined the sensitivity of the lever sign test for the clinical diagnosis of ACL tears during real-life situations encountered by mountain physicians. This sensitivity was lower than expected. The Lachman test, on the other hand, showed a very high sensitivity. It remains the test of choice for the clinical diagnosis of ACL tears in patients with knee injuries. Therefore, the lever sign test can complement the Lachman test but is not a substitute for it. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of the "lever sign test" to diagnose ACL rupture and to compare this test to the two most commonly used, the Lachman and anterior drawer test. METHOD: This prospective study was performed in the ED of the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium) from March 2017 to May 2019. 52 patients were included undergoing knee trauma, within 8 days, with an initial radiograph excluding a fracture (except Segond fracture or tibial spine fracture). On clinical investigation, patients showed a positive lever sign test and/or a positive Lachman test and/or a positive anterior drawer test. Exclusion criteria were a complete rupture of the knee extensor mechanism and patellar dislocation. All the physicians involved in this study were residents in training. An MRI was performed within 3 weeks for all included patients after the clinical examination. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were investigated for all three tests with MRI used as our reference standard. RESULTS: Forty out of 52 patients suffered an ACL rupture (77%) and 12 did not (23%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the lever sign test were respectively 92.5%, 25% 82% and 50%. Those of the Lachman test were 54%, 54.5%, 81% and 25%, and those of the anterior drawer test were 56%, 82%, 90.5% and 37.5%. Twelve out of 40 ACL ruptures (30%) were diagnosed exclusively with a positive lever sign test. CONCLUSION: When investigating acute ACL ruptures (< 8 days) in the ED, the lever sign test offers a sensitivity of 92.5%, far superior to that of other well-known clinical tests. The lever sign test is relatively pain-free, easy to perform and its visual interpretation requires less experience. Positive lever sign test at the ED should lead to an MRI to combine high clinical sensitivity with high MRI specificity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most commonly injured ligaments in the knee. With the prevalence of ACL tears increasing, there is a growing need for clinical tests to rule in and rule out a suspected tear. A new clinical test for detecting ACL tears has been introduced with preliminary studies showing promising results. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: To systematically review and analyze information from the current literature on the diagnostic accuracy of the Lever Sign test for the use of diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in a clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A computerized search of PubMed, Cinahl, Scopus, and Proquest databases as well as a hand-search was completed on all available literature using keywords relating to the diagnostic accuracy of the Lever Sign Test. A quality assessment was performed on each article included in this review utilizing the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS). RESULTS: Eight articles were included, with only three studies exhibiting high quality, however the study samples were heterogenous. Included studies indicated that the Lever Sign test is both sensitive and specific in diagnosing ACL tears. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 and 0.90, respectively. The negative likelihood ratio is 0.22 and the positive likelihood ratio is 6.60. CONCLUSION: The Lever Sign test is comparable to other clinical tests used in current practice to detect an ACL rupture. The pooled data from current available literature on the Lever Sign indicate that a positive or negative test should result in a moderate shift in post-test probability. This test may be used in addition to other tests to rule in and rule out the presence of an ACL rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a- Systematic Review of Level 2 diagnostic studies.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The lever sign test is a new physical examination tool to diagnose anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Preliminary results suggest almost 100% sensitivity and specificity to diagnose acute and chronic complete ACL tears and clinically significant partial tears as compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PURPOSE: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test for the diagnosis of acute ACL injuries, as compared to MRI. We also aimed to determine the accuracy of the lever sign test compared with 3 other tests (anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift) when performed by providers of various training levels, and with the patient awake or under anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: We evaluated patients with a chief concern of acute (≤4 weeks) knee pain seen between October 2014 and January 2015, with a thorough history, physical examination, and standard radiographs. MRI was the reference standard; patients without an MRI evaluation were excluded. The 4 physical examination maneuvers were performed on each symptomatic knee during the initial clinic visit (for nonsurgical patients) or under anesthesia in the operating room (for surgical patients) by a randomly assigned undergraduate student, medical student, orthopaedic resident, or orthopaedic fellow. The senior author trained all staff to perform the lever sign test. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 102 patients, 54 were surgical (28 female, 26 male), and 48 were nonsurgical (16 female, 32 male); the mean patient age was 23 years (range, 15-66 years). The overall accuracy of the lever sign test was 77% (63% sensitivity, 90% specificity); the accuracy was similar between patients under anesthesia and awake (77% vs 76%, respectively). There were no significant differences when comparing the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test with patients under anesthesia and awake (sensitivity: under anesthesia, 86%, and awake, 68% [P = .40]; specificity: under anesthesia, 85%, and awake, 96% [P = .17]). Furthermore, the accuracy of the lever sign test was similar when performed on female versus male patients (75% vs 79%, respectively) or when performed by undergraduate students and medical students compared with orthopaedic residents and fellows (84% vs 88%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study results challenge the exceptional sensitivity and specificity values (both 100%) of the lever sign test, as reported by the original author of the test.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A new clinical test for the diagnosis of ACL rupture is described: the so-called "Lever Sign". This prospective study on four groups of patients divided subjects on the basis of MRI findings (complete or partial ACL lesion) and the clinical phase of the injury (acute or chronic). The hypothesis was that this manual test would be diagnostic for both partial and complete tears of the ACL regardless of the elapsed time from injury. METHODS: A total of 400 patients were evaluated and divided into four, equal-sized groups based on time elapsed from injury and MRI findings: Group A (acute phase with positive MRI for complete ACL rupture), Group B (chronic phase with positive MRI for complete ACL rupture), Group C (acute phase with positive MRI for partial ACL rupture), and Group D (chronic phase with positive MRI for partial ACL rupture). Clinical assessment was performed with the Lachman test, the Anterior Drawer test, the Pivot Shift test, and the Lever Sign test. The Lever Sign test involves placing a fulcrum under the supine patient's calf and applying a downward force to the quadriceps. Depending on whether the ACL is intact or not, the patient's heel will either rise off of the examination table or remain down. Additionally, the Lever Sign test was performed on the un-injured leg of all 400 patients as a control. RESULTS: All tests were nearly 100 % sensitive for patients with chronic, complete tears of the ACL. However, for patients with acute, partial tears, the sensitivity was much lower for the Lachman test (0.42), Anterior Drawer test (0.29), and Pivot Shift test (0.11), but not the Lever Sign test (1.00). CONCLUSION: In general, chronic, complete tears were most successfully diagnosed but acute, partial tears were least successfully diagnosed. The Lever Sign test is more sensitive to correctly diagnosing both acute and partial tears of the ACL compared with other common manual tests. The clinical relevance is that some ACL ruptures may be more accurately diagnosed.

Asunto(s)