RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare postoperative complications in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB) who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization (LSPD) versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures. METHODS: A retrospective collection of medical records was conducted from January 2014 to May 2020 at Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The study included patients from the departments of trauma surgery, interventional radiology, and general surgery who were diagnosed with EVB caused by portal hypertension and treated with LSPD or TIPS. Follow-up data were obtained to assess the occurrence of postoperative complications in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included in the study, with 104 cases in the LSPD group and 97 cases in the TIPS group. There was no significant difference in the 1-year and 3-year post-surgery survival rates between the TIPS and LSPD groups (P = 0.669, 0.066). The 3-year survival rate of Child-Pugh B patients in the LSPD group was higher than TIPS group (P = 0.041). The LSPD group also had a significantly higher rate of freedom from rebleeding at 3-year post-surgery compared to the TIPS group (P = 0.038). Stratified analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the rebleeding rate between the two groups. Furthermore, the LSPD group had a higher rate of freedom from overt hepatic encephalopathy at 1-year and 3-year post-surgery compared to the TIPS group (P = 0.007, < 0.001). The LSPD group also had a lower rate of severe complications at 3-year post-surgery compared to the TIPS group (P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Compared to TIPS, LSPD does not increase the risk of mortality and rebleeding, while demonstrating fewer complications. In patients classified as Child-Pugh A and B, the use of LSPD for treating EVB is both safe and effective.
Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Laparoscopía , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Humanos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/cirugía , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/efectos adversos , Esplenectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Endoclip migration(ECM) after laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization (LESD) is a rare and dangerous postoperative complication. The emergence of such cases led to our consideration of the timing of use of nonabsorbable endoclips. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describes a patient with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who underwent LESD. Two years after the operation, an endoclip was found in the fornix of the fundus of his stomach by gastroscopy. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: A 66-year-old male patient had a history of liver cirrhosis for 9 years. Two years prior, LESD was performed on this patient in our hospital. This time, due to 'repeated black stool for 1 month, and hematemesis 1 time', the patient was admitted to the hospital. A diagnosis of 'liver cirrhosis with esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding' was considered. Gastroscopy revealed a fundal foreign body, and upon review of the patient history, the foreign body was found to be a nonabsorbable endoclip. CONCLUSION: Foreign literature has reported cases of biliary endoclip migration after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but no cases of ECM after LESD have been reported. For such cases, we should consider the timing of the application of nonabsorbable endoclips during vascular devascularization to avoid ECM after the operation. In addition, we should also comprehensively evaluate whether the ectopic endoclips should be removed.