RESUMEN
Background: More than 40% of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures were combined with atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in China. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the sex differences in the combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and LAAC procedures. Methods: Data from the LAACablation (Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Combination With Catheter Ablation) registry, which enrolled AF patients who underwent the combined procedure between 2018 and 2021, were analyzed. Procedural complications, long-term outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) were compared between sexes. Results: Of 931 patients, 402 (43.2%) were women. Compared with men, women were older (age 71.3 ± 7.4 years vs 68.7 ± 8.1 years; P < 0.001), presented more often with paroxysmal AF (52.5% vs 42.7%; P < 0.003), and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (4.1 ± 1.5 vs 3.1 ± 1.5; P < 0.001), but received less often linear ablation and had shorter total procedural times and radiofrequency catheter ablation times. Women had similar rates of total and major procedural complications but presented with a higher incidence of minor complications than men (3.7% vs 1.3%; P = 0.027). Follow-up over 1,812 patient-years revealed similar adverse events between women and men, including all-cause death (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.43-1.85; P = 0.754), thromboembolic events (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.54-2.52; P = 0.697), major bleeding (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.38-2.44; P = 0.935), and their composite (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.56-1.28; P = 0.434). The recurrence rates of atrial tachyarrhythmia were also comparable between sexes presenting either paroxysmal or persistent AF. Women were seen with greater QoL impairment at baseline, but the sex gap narrowed at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: In AF patients who underwent the combined procedure, women had similar procedural safety and long-term efficacy to men and presented greater QoL improvement. (Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Combination With Catheter Ablation [LAACablation]; NCT03788941).
RESUMEN
Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with the reversed chicken-wing (RCW) LAA is challenging. Aims: To elucidate the LAAC strategy of the RCW-LAA. Methods: A total of 802 AF patients who were enrolled in the LAACablation registry for LAAC procedure were included, 55 of whom presented with the RCW-LAA. The WATCHMAN device was implanted using the standard protocol when the sheath depth was no less than the device depth (the simple group). For those with a sheath depth of less than the device depth (the complex group), device deployment was attempted with acceptable protrusion or after a repeated atrial transseptal puncture (re-ATP) at a more inferior and anterior position. The anatomical and procedural features were compared between groups and before and after the re-ATP. Results: The success rate of LAAC was significantly lower in patients with the RCW-LAA than with the other morphologies (92.7% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.001). Compared with the simple group, the complex group had shorter root depth and shorter neck length, and more LAAs in the complex group were at lower position (all p < 0.05). The sheath depth after the re-ATP was significantly greater than that before the re-ATP (18.8 ± 3.4 mm vs. 14.7 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.001). For the patients who underwent re-ATP, the sheath went significantly deeper in successful procedures than in aborted procedures (19.7 ± 3.3 mm vs. 15.8 ± 1.8 mm, p = 0.040). Conclusions: The anatomical features of the RCW-LAA were related to the complexity of the LAAC procedure. The re-ATP at an inferior and anterior location could increase the success rate of LAAC. ClinicalTrialsgov: NCT03788941.
RESUMEN
Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) device implantation may be challenging in cases with difficult LAA anatomy. A deflectable sheath to approach multiple LAA positions may be helpful. We used a deflectable sheath to implant LAAC devices in 20 patients and included 60 cases using the standard sheaths for comparison. The procedures were successful in all patients without peri-procedural complications. After a median follow-up of 1.52 (IQR: 0.76-2.33) years, none of the patients in the deflectable sheath group had peri-device leak ≥3 mm and experienced thromboembolic stroke. In the standard sheath group, after follow-up of 2.03 (IQR: 0.87-3.19) years, 2 had peri-device leak ≥3 mm and 1 experienced thromboembolic stroke. We first proved the idea of using a universal steerable sheath for LAAC device implantation in difficult LAA anatomy, which also allows rapid switching of different LAAC devices.
RESUMEN
An 86-year-old woman experienced hypoxia with right-to-left flow across an iatrogenic atrial septal defect after deployment of a left atrial appendage closure device. Emergent closure of the defect was performed with an atrial septal occluder device with resolution of hypoxia. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
RESUMEN
A 77-year-old patient with previous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure suffered from transient ischemic attack 6 years after the initial procedure. Computed tomography (CT) revealed appendage patency related to a late-acquired semicircular peri-device leak. The leak was treated by percutaneous LAA coiling. Subsequent clinical evolution was uneventful. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) are often severly anemic and close to the transfusion threshold. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of severe anemia in this cohort and if procedural safety is compromised compared with non-anemic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Comparison of severly anemic patients (Hb < 80 g/l) vs. non-severly anemic patients in the prospective, multicentre observational LAARGE registry of patients undergoing LAAC. A total of 638 patients (anemia 22.3% vs non-anemic 77.7%) were included. Anemic patients were older (77.1 years ± 7.9 vs 75.6 years ± 7.9, p = 0.014), had more comorbidities, higher CHA2DS2-VASc (4.8 vs 4.4, p = 0.017) and higher HAS-BLED (4.3 vs 3.8, p < 0.001) scores. Implant success was not influenced by anemia (99.3% vs 97.2%). Severe in-hospital (0.7% vs 5.6%, p = 0.01) and overall complications (8.5% vs 13.7%, p = 0.11) were less common in patients with anemia, driven by fewer pericardial effusions. Mortality was higher in anemic patients and associated with an increased hazard ratio, albeit not significantly (16.0% vs 10.3%, HR 1.61 (95%-CI: 0.97-2.67), p = 0.06). In the one-year follow-up, composite outcome of death, stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 22/142 anemic and in 54/496 non-anemic patients with an adjusted HR of 1.04 (95%-CI 0.62-1.73, p = 0.89). CONCLUSION: Severe anemia close to the transfusion threshold is common in patients undergoing LAAC. However, this does not influence in-hospital complications or implant success. One-year mortality is higher in anemic patients, mainly driven by co-morbidities.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data reporting a head-to-head comparison between Amulet and Watchman devices are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the Watchman™ versus Amulet™ left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices in a consecutive, industry-independent registry. METHODS: Patients who underwent LAAC using Watchman or Amulet devices from January 2014 to December 2019 at the University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany were included in the present analysis. Primary endpoints included periprocedural complications (in-hospital death, pericardial tamponade, device embolization, stroke, major bleeding and vascular access complications), and complications during long-term follow-up (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, thromboembolism, device thrombus, bleeding and death). RESULTS: After matching the patients for age (±5 years), gender, CHA2DS2Vasc score (±1) and HASBLED score (±1), each of the Watchman and the Amulet groups included 113 patients. Patients in the Amulet group had significantly more periprocedural complications (2.7% vs 10.6%, p = 0.029; respectively) and more major bleeding complications (0% vs 5.3%, p = 0.029; respectively). During long-term follow-up, the rate of events was comparable between the Watchman and Amulet groups (18.3% versus 20.8%, p = 0.729; respectively). CONCLUSION: Amulet LAAC device was associated with increased periprocedural complications as compared to Watchman LAAC device. On long-term follow-up, both devices showed comparable efficacy and safety.
RESUMEN
Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has evolved as a safe alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy for stroke prophylaxis. However, the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder device is considered a relative contraindication. Here we report a successful case of LAAC in the presence of a PFO occluder device. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).
RESUMEN
Bevacizumab is now an emerging treatment option for severe hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-related bleeding including epistaxis and gastrointestinal tract bleeding. The impact of long-term intravenous bevacizumab therapy on cardiac structure and function is unknown. We describe 3 patients receiving intravenous bevacizumab therapy for severe hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-related bleeding who were found to have abnormal mobile masses on the mitral valve (n=2) and aortic valve (n=1). The clinical impact of these findings is unknown and requires further study.
RESUMEN
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice with indication for anticoagulation in those patients whose annual risk for thromboembolism is >2%. Left atrial appendage closure is growing as an alternative to anticoagulation. We present a case of pulmonary artery-left atrial appendage fistula seen after left atrial appendage closure. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).