RESUMEN

Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is an established and less invasive surgical approach for patients with adult spinal deformities. This method can also be applied to the L5/S1 region (termed "OLIF51"); however, reports on L5 nerve root radiculopathy as a rare complication of OLIF51 are limited. Here, we present the case of a 77-year-old woman with progressive adult spinal deformity who was followed up after an initial OLIF for the L3/4 and L4/5 levels. An additional operation was performed to resolve ambulation difficulty and back pain related to adult spinal deformity. Circumferential fixation was performed over two sessions. Initially, OLIF51 was performed concurrently with OLIF for L1/2 and L2/3. Eight days later, posterior fixation surgery from T10 to the ilium via percutaneous pedicle screws was performed. Two days after the second operation, the patient started complaining of left L5 nerve root radiculopathy, for which medication and rehabilitation were both ineffective. Retrospectively, we identified that the left L5/S1 foramen narrowed after the lordotic correction by OLIF51 and posterior fixation. Additionally, posterior facetectomy for L5/S1 was performed, and the left L5 nerve root radiculopathy was resolved. L5 nerve root radiculopathy can develop as a rare complication of OLIF51. Neurosurgeons should be aware of this rare complication related to OLIF51.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Extraforaminal stenosis in L5-S1, or far-out syndrome (FOS), is defined as L5 nerve compression by the transverse process (TP) of the L5 and the ala of the sacrum and disc bulging with/without osteophytes and/or the thickened lumbosacral and extraforaminal ligament. This study aims to describe the unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression technique of the extraforaminal stenosis at L5-S1 or far out syndrome and evaluate its clinical results with a literature review. Case Report: A 44-year-old male presented with severe right sharp shooting pain in the buttock, thigh, leg, foot, and/or toes with numbness in the foot and toes (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] 8/10) for six months with an Oswestry disability index (ODI) score of 70%. Her pain aggravated when bending forward and performing daily routine activities. He also complained of exaggeration of pain in daily regular activities. On physical examination, power in the right lower limbs was 5/5 as per the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading, and deep tendon reflexes were normal. Pre-operative X-ray and CT scan showed no instability or calcified disc osteophyte, and magnetic resonance imaging showed extraforaminal stenosis due to disc herniation at L5-S1 in Figure 1. We performed UBE-L5-S1extraforaminal discectomy surgery to resolve his symptoms. The operative time was 68 min; blood loss was 30 mL. After surgery, the patient was followed up at one week, six weeks, three months, six months, 12 months, and two years. The pain and tingling sensation in the legs improved at the 1-week follow-up, with a VAS score of 0/10 and an ODI score of 10% at the 2-year follow-up. Patient satisfaction was surveyed using Macnab's criteria at the final follow-up visit of 2 years and was found to be excellent. Post-operative imaging showed a good extraforaminal decompression at L5-S. Conclusion: Unilateral biportal endoscopy technique has brought a paradigm shift in the treatment of spinal pathologies and has served as another treatment option for the past two decades. The UBE decompression technique for extraforaminal stenosis at L5-S1 has the advantages of minimally invasive spine surgery; it is a safe and effective treatment option for treating extraforaminal stenosis at L5-S1.

RESUMEN

Anterolisthesis is a condition where a vertebra in the spine slips forward relative to the vertebra below it. Anterolisthesis is often described in terms of the direction of the slippage and the affected vertebrae, such as L5-S1 anterolisthesis, which indicates the slippage occurring between the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) and the sacral bone (S1). Anterolisthesis can result from various factors, trauma, or congenital abnormalities. The symptoms associated with anterolisthesis can include lower back pain, stiffness, muscle tightness, and neurological symptoms if the slippage compresses nearby nerves. The piriformis muscle, situated deep within the buttocks, plays a crucial role in this scenario, as its contraction or inflammation can exacerbate the compression of the sciatic nerve, intensifying the pain and discomfort experienced by the individual. Patients with L5-S1 anterolisthesis and bilateral piriformis syndrome commonly report challenges in daily activities involving hip movement, such as walking, sitting, or standing for prolonged periods of time. The combined effects of vertebral slippage and piriformis involvement contribute to altered gait patterns and may lead to difficulties in maintaining a stable and pain-free posture. Effective management often necessitates a comprehensive approach, encompassing physical therapy, pain management strategies, and, in severe cases, surgical intervention. We report a case of a 75-year-old male who complained of pain in his back radiating to both lower limbs with a history of slipping and falling in the bathroom one month prior, sustaining an injury to his back, and who visited the orthopedics department of Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH), Sawangi, Wardha, where an investigation was done and an X-ray revealed L5-S1 anterolisthesis. Physiotherapy plays a crucial role in reducing pain, improving the range of motion and muscle strength, decreasing muscle tightness, and enhancing the quality of life. The goal of physiotherapeutic rehabilitation for L5-S1 anterolisthesis management is to optimize functional recovery, reduce pain, improve the range of motion and muscle strength, and improve the overall quality of life for individuals with this condition.

RESUMEN

Background: The L5S1 level exhibits unique anatomical features compared with other levels. This makes minimally invasive surgery for L5S1 foraminal stenosis (FS) challenging. This study compared the surgical outcomes of full endoscopic transforaminal decompression (FETD) and unilateral biportal endoscopy with the far-lateral approach (UBEFLA) in patients with L5S1FS. Methods: In this retrospective study, 49 patients with L5S1FS were divided into two groups. Of these, 24 patients underwent FETD, 25 patients underwent UBEFLA. The study assessed demographic data, leg pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, back pain VAS score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), modified MacNab outcome scale, and radiographic parameters including postoperative lateral facet preservation (POLFP). Results: The Mann-Whitney U test revealed that the UBEFLA group exhibited a higher VAS score for back pain at one week after the operation, whereas the FETD group exhibited a higher leg pain VAS score 6 weeks after the operation. All four undesired MacNab outcomes in the FETD group were attributed to residual leg pain, whereas all five undesired MacNab outcomes in the UBEFLA group were due to recurrent symptoms. Radiographically, the FETD group exhibited greater POLFP. Conclusions: When L5S1FS is performed, there may be challenges in adequately clearing the foraminal space in FETD. On the other hand, UBEFLA allowed for a more comprehensive clearance. However, this advantage of UBEFLA was associated with spinal instability as a future outcome.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to describe the feasibility, surgical approach window (SAW), and incision line (IL) for oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1 (OLIF51) using computed tomography (CT). A secondary aim was to identify associations among approach characteristics and demographic and anthropometric factors. METHODS: We performed a radiographic study of 50 male and 50 female subjects who received abdominal CT imaging. SAW was measured as the distance from the midline to the medial border of the iliac vessel. IL was measured at the skin surface corresponding to the distance between the center of the disc space and SAW lateral margin. OLIF51 feasibility was defined as the existence of at least a 1-cm SAW without retraction of soft tissues. RESULTS: For the left side, the OLIF51 SAW and IL were 12.1 ± 4.6 and 175.1 ± 55.3 mm. For the right side, these measures were 10.0 ± 4.3 and 185.0 ± 52.5 mm. Correlations of r = 0.648 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.656 (p < 0.001) were observed between weight and IL on the left and right sides, respectively. OLIF51 was not feasible 23% of the time. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest CT study to determine the feasibility of performing an OLIF51. Without the use of retraction, OLIF51 is not feasible 23% of the time. Left-sided OLIF51 allows for a larger surgical approach window and smaller incision compared to the right side. Larger incisions are required for adequate surgical exposure in patients with higher weight.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There are 2 surgical corridors to L5-S1 lumbar interbody fusion via the left oblique approach: anterior to psoas-oblique lateral interbody fusion (ATP-OLIF) and oblique-anterior lumbar interbody fusion (O-ALIF). The aim of this study was to evaluate criteria to guide the selection of surgical corridors for L5-S1 lumbar interbody fusion via the left oblique approach. METHODS: According to the structure of L5-S1 segment left common iliac vein (LCIV) in axial magnetic resonance image, the LCIV was divided into 6 types. O-ALIF was performed for type I and type II. ATP-OLIF was performed for type A and type B. For sexually active men, ATP-OLIF was chosen. Between April 2020 and April 2022, 22 patients were assigned to ATP-OLIF or O-ALIF based on the type of LCIV. Clinical outcomes and radiographic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: There were 11 cases in O-ALIF group (type I, n = 10; type II, n = 1) and 11 cases in ATP-OLIF group (type A, n = 8; type B, n = 3). No differences were observed in clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, VAS, and complication rate); radiographic outcomes (mean disk height and segmental lordosis angle); length of hospital stay; operation time; and blood loss. No vascular injury occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This may be an appropriate criterion to guide the selection of surgical corridor for L5-S1 lumbar interbody fusion through the left oblique approach. O-ALIF was performed for type I and type II. ATP-OLIF was performed for type A and type B. For sexually active men, ATP-OLIF was chosen. According to this standard, the operation can be performed safely and with good clinical results.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report our experience with spinal anesthesia (SA) in patients undergoing L5-S1 interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and clarify its advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: One hundred twelve patients who underwent IELD for an L5-S1 disc herniation under SA were retrospectively analyzed. SA with 0.5% ropivacaine was administered using a 27-gauge fine needle. Intraoperatively, the volume and level of SA, surgical time, blood loss, and cardiopulmonary complications were documented. Postoperative data was collected included the number of patients who ambulated on the day of surgery, incidence of complications and were then statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Analgesia was complete throughout the entire operation in all patients and no other adjuvant intraoperative analgesic drugs were needed. Mean visual analog scale scores for intraoperative and early postoperative (24 h) pain were 0 and 2.43 ± 1.66. SA was administered at the L3-4 interspace in 34 patients (30.4%) and the L2-3 interspace in 78 (69.6%). Administration was successful with the first attempt in all patients. Mean operation time was 70.12 ± 6.52 min. Mean intraoperative blood loss volume was 20.71 ± 5.26 ml. Ninety-eight patients ambulated on the same day as surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 24.36 ± 3.64 h. Dural injury without damaging the nerve root occurred in one patient. One patient experienced recurrent disc herniation. Intraoperative hypotension and respiratory distress occurred in five (4.5%) and three (2.7%) patients, respectively. Three patients (2.7%) received postoperative analgesia therapy and two (1.8%) experienced nausea. Two patients (1.8%) developed urinary retention. Spinal headache, cauda equina syndrome, and neurotoxicity did not occur. CONCLUSION: SA can achieve satisfactory pain control for patients undergoing IELD with a low incidence of adverse events. SA may be a useful alternative to local and general anesthesia for IELD surgery. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted to investigate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Junctional failures after long fusion stopping at L5 can present at both proximal and distal ends. The purpose of this study was to investigate incidences and risk factors of proximal junctional failure (PJF) and distal junctional failure (DJF) after long lumbar instrumented fusion stopping at L5 for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: Sixty-three patients who underwent long fusion surgery stopping at L5 with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were reviewed retrospectively. PJF and DJF were defined as newly developed back pain and/or radiculopathy with corresponding radiographic failures. The incidence and risk factors of each junctional failure were analyzed using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Twelve men and 51 women were included in our study. Their mean age was 68.5 ± 7.0 years and the mean follow-up period was 84.5 ± 45.3 months. PJF and DJF occurred in 17 (27%) and 16 patients (25.4%), respectively. PJF and DJF developed at median durations of 32.1 months and 13.3 months, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two. Three patients presented with both PJF and DJF. Risk factors for PJF included lower body mass index, higher preoperative lumbar lordosis, and higher postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (hazard ratio, 0.570, 1.055, and 1.040, respectively). For DJF, higher preoperative SVA was an independent risk factor (hazard ratio, 1.010). CONCLUSIONS: After long fusion surgery stopping at L5, PJF and DJF occurred at similar rates. Lower body mass index, higher preoperative lumbar lordosis, and higher postoperative SVA were risk factors for PJF. Higher preoperative SVA was an independent risk factor for DJF.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: Restoration of lordosis in lumbar fusion reduces low back pain, decreases adjacent segment degeneration, and improves postoperative outcomes. However, the potential effects of changes in segmental lordosis on adjacent-level and global lordosis remain less understood. This study aims to examine the relationships between segmental (SL), adjacent-level, and global lumbar lordosis following L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF). METHODS: 80 consecutive patients who underwent single-level L5-S1 ALIF were divided into 3 groups based on the degree of change (∆) in index-level segmental lordosis: <5° (n = 23), 5°-10° (n = 29), >10° (n = 28). Radiographic parameters measured included global lumbar, segmental, and adjacent level lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and PI-LL mismatch. RESULTS: Patients with ∆SL 5°-10° or ∆SL >10° both showed significant increases in global lumbar lordosis from preoperative to final follow-up. However, patients with ∆SL >10° showed statistically significant losses in adjacent level lordosis at both immediate postoperative and final follow-up compared to preoperative. When comparing patients with ∆SL >10° to those with ∆SL 5-10°, there were no significant differences in global lumbar lordosis at final follow-up, due to significantly greater losses of adjacent level lordosis in these patients. CONCLUSION: The degree of compensatory loss of lordosis at the adjacent level L4-L5 correlated with the extent of segmental lordosis creation at the index L5-S1 level. This may suggest that the L4 to S1 segment acts as a "harmonious unit," able to accommodate only a certain amount of lordosis and further increases in segmental lordosis may be mitigated by loss of adjacent-level lordosis.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in transiliac endoscopic-assisted L5S1 intraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (iLIF). METHODS: Between September 2020 and September 2021, patients with L5S1 degenerative disk disease were enrolled in a prospective study on transiliac L5S1 iLIF and followed for a minimum of 12 months. Conflict of the preoperative planned approach with the ilium was mandatory. The primary outcome measures were the Oswestry Disability Index, the visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain (VAS back) and leg pain (VAS leg), and the modified MacNab criteria. The secondary outcomes were complications and fusion rates. RESULTS: Five consecutive patients were enrolled: 2 males and 3 females with a mean age of 50 ± 12.9. All had 12 months' follow-up. The mean improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index, VAS back, and VAS leg (44 ± 11.75, 6.6 ± 1.7, and 4.7 ± 4.2, respectively) was more than 3 times the minimum clinically important difference. The modified MacNab criteria were good or excellent in 80% of cases at all endpoints. Three patients had ipsilateral lower limb dysesthesia. One patient had revision surgery for foraminal bone fragment removal. All patients achieved fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The transiliac iLIF is a feasible but demanding surgical technique that allows overcoming cases in which the ilium prevents endoscopic transforaminal access to L5S1. Our preliminary results had good clinical outcomes and high fusion rates. The main complication was late-onset dysesthesia of the ipsilateral lower limb, 10 to 14 days after surgery. Special care must be taken to prevent L5 dorsal root ganglion injury.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost and effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and microscope-assisted tubular discectomy (MATD) for patients with L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: The medical and financial records of patients diagnosed with L5/S1 LDH and who underwent either PEID or MATD from April 2021 to April 2022 were retrospectively collected. Demographic and baseline information, perioperative observational index, clinical outcomes, and inpatient costs were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included, with 30 patients in the PEID group and 30 patients in the MATD group. No significant difference was found in demographic and baseline information between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The PEID group showed significantly shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and higher intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency compared with the MATD group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in visual analog scale back/leg score, Oswestry Disability Index, and 36-Item Short-Form Survey score between PEID and MATD groups before the surgery and at any follow-up time points (P > 0.05). The total cost, surgery cost, and surgical instruments/materials cost were significantly higher in the PEID group compared with the MATD group (P < 0.05). In contrast, the drug and nursing costs were significantly higher in the MATD group than in the PEID group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PEID and MATD provide equivalent clinical efficacy and safety in treating LDH at L5/S1 segment within a 1-year follow-up. However, PEID is less invasive and MATD is less costly. No one surgical technique is superior in all aspects and patients should make decisions according to their top concern.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive single position lateral ALIF at L5-S1 with simultaneous robot-assisted posterior fixation has technical and anatomic considerations that need further description. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of single position lateral ALIF at L5-S1 with robotic assisted fixation. End points included radiographic parameters, lordosis distribution index (LDI), complications, pedicle screw accuracy, and inpatient metrics. RESULTS: There were 17 patients with mean age of 60.5 years. Eight patients underwent interbody fusion at L5-S1, five patients at L4-S1, two patients at L3-S1, and one patient at L2-S1 in single lateral position. Operative times for 1-level and 2-level cases were 193 min and 278 min, respectively. Mean EBL was 71 cc. Mean improvements in L5-S1 segmental lordosis were 11.7 ± 4.0°, L1-S1 lordosis of 4.8 ± 6.4°, sagittal vertical axis of - 0.1 ± 1.7 cm°, pelvic tilt of - 3.1 ± 5.9°, and pelvic incidence lumbar-lordosis mismatch of - 4.6 ± 6.4°. Six patients corrected into a normal LDI (50-80%) and no patients became imbalanced over a mean follow-up period of 14.4 months. Of 100 screws placed in lateral position with robotic assistance, there were three total breaches (two lateral grade 3, one medial grade 2) for a screw accuracy of 97.0%. There were no neurologic, vascular, bowel, or ureteral injuries, and no implant failure or reoperation. CONCLUSION: Single position lateral ALIF at L5-S1 with simultaneous robotic placement of pedicle screws by a second surgeon is a safe and effective technique that improves global alignment and lordosis distribution index.

RESUMEN

Background: Although rare, traumatic lumbosacral (L/S) Grade I spondylolisthesis (i.e., Lumbar locked facet syndrome) is characterized by unilateral or bilateral facet dislocations. Case Description: A 25-year-old male presented following a high velocity road traffic accident with back pain and tenderness at the L/S junction. His radiologic images showed bilateral locked facets at the L5/S1 level with Grade 1 spondylolisthesis, bilateral pars fractures, acute traumatic L5/S1 disc herniation, and disruption of the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments. After undergoing a L4-S1 laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation, he became asymptomatic and remained neurologically stable. Conclusion: L5/S1 facet dislocation whether unilateral or bilateral needs to be diagnosed early and treated with realignment and instrumented stabilization.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coaxial radiography-guided puncture technique (CR-PT) is a novel technique for endoscopic lumbar discectomy. As the X-ray beam and the puncturing needle are maintained in a parallel and coaxial direction, the X-ray beam can be used to guide the trajectory angle, facilitating the choice of the puncture site and providing real-time guidance. This puncture technique offers numerous advantages over the conventional anterior-posterior and lateral radiography-guided puncture technique (AP-PT), especially in cases of herniated lumbar discs with a hypertrophied transverse process or articular process, high iliac crest, and narrowed intervertebral foramen. AIM: To confirm whether CR-PT is a superior approach to percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy compared to AP-PT. METHODS: In this parallel, controlled, randomized clinical trial, herniated lumbar disc patients appointed to receive percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy treatment were recruited from the Pain Management Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Sixty-five participants were enrolled and divided into either a CR-PT group or an AP-PT group. The CR-PT group underwent CR-PT, and the AP-PT group underwent AP-PT. The number of fluoroscopies during puncturing, puncture duration (min), surgery duration (min), VAS score during puncturing, and puncture success rate were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants were included, with 31 participants in the CR-PT group and 34 in the AP-PT group. One participant in the AP-PT group dropped out due to unsuccessful puncturing. The number of fluoroscopies [median (P25, P75)] was 12 (11, 14) in the CR-PT group vs 16 (12, 23) in the AP-PT group, while the puncture duration (mean ± SD) was 20.42 ± 5.78 vs 25.06 ± 5.46, respectively. The VAS score was 3 (2, 4) in the CR-PT group vs 3 (3, 4) in the AP-PT group. Further subgroup analysis was performed, considering only the participants with L5/S1 segment herniation: 9 patients underwent CR-PT, and 9 underwent AP-PT. The number of fluoroscopies was 11.56 ± 0.88 vs 25.22 ± 5.33; the puncture duration was 13.89 ± 1.45 vs 28.89 ± 3.76; the surgery duration was 105 (99.5, 120) vs 149 (125, 157.5); and the VAS score was 2.11 ± 0.93 vs 3.89 ± 0.6, respectively. All the above outcomes demonstrated statistical significance (P < 0.05), favoring the CR-PT treatment. CONCLUSION: CR-PT is a novel and effective technique. As opposed to conventional AP-PT, this technique significantly improves puncture accuracy, shortens puncture time and operation time, and reduces pain intensity during puncturing.

RESUMEN

Background Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a common surgical procedure for lumbar spondylolisthesis and intervertebral foraminal stenosis. Sacroiliac joint ankylosis is also known to occur in patients without axial spondyloarthritis. When sacroiliac joint bony ankylosis occurs and sacroiliac joint mobility is lost, stresses from the lower extremities to the lumbar spine are no longer buffered and are expected to be concentrated between the fifth lumbar (L5) and the first sacral (S1) vertebrae. We hypothesized that sacroiliac joint bony ankylosis could adversely affect L5/S1 intervertebral fusion and investigated the postoperative intervertebral fusion rate in single intervertebral TLIF on L5/S1 among patients with bony ankylosis of the sacroiliac joint. Methods Seventy-two patients who had undergone TLIF in the L5/S1 single intervertebral segment since 2014 and had a follow-up of at least one year after surgery were included in the study. Seventy-two patients were divided into the following two groups for comparison: group A consisted of 17 patients with bony ankylosis of the sacroiliac joint on either side on preoperative CT, and group N consisted of 55 patients without ankylosis. We investigated the intervertebral segment fusion rate one year postoperatively. Fisher's exact tests were used for statistical analysis, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results Twelve patients (71%) in group A and 50 patients (91%) in group N had a fusion of the L5/S1 intervertebral segment one year after TLIF surgery, with a significantly lower rate in group A (P = 0.049). Conclusions We conclude that the presence of preoperative sacroiliac joint bony ankylosis is a risk factor for postoperative intervertebral fusion failure after single-segment TLIF at L5/S1.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Although full endoscopic lumbar discectomy with the transforaminal approach (FED-TF) is a minimally invasive spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation, the lumbosacral levels present anatomical challenges when performing FED-TF surgery due to the presence of the iliac bone. Materials and Methods: In this study, we simulated whether FED-TF surgery could be safely performed on a total of 52 consecutive cases with L5-S1 or L5-L6 disc herniation using fused three-dimensional (3D) images of the lumbar nerve root on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) created with artificial intelligence and of the lumbosacral spine and iliac on computed tomography (CT) images. Results: Thirteen of the fifty-two cases were deemed operable according to simulated FED-TF surgery without foraminoplasty using the 3D MRI/CT fusion images. All 13 cases underwent FED-TF surgery without neurological complications, and their clinical symptoms significantly improved. Conclusions: Three-dimensional simulation may allow for the assessment from multiple angles of the endoscope entry and path, as well as the insertion angle. FED-TF surgery simulation using 3D MRI/CT fusion images could be useful in determining the indications for full endoscopic surgery for lumbosacral disc herniation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Lumbosacral pseudoarthrosis is a common complication following adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery. This study assessed the reoperation rate for L5-S1 pseudoarthrosis in the ASD population. Compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs), we hypothesized that anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) would result in lower rates of L5-S1 pseudarthrosis. METHODS: This is a single center study with patient data retrieved from a prospective ASD database. The patients had a long-segment fusion, ALIF or TLIF at the L5-S1 level with a 2-year follow-up and were divided into 2 groups (TLIF and ALIF). The study's primary outcome was to assess the difference in the reoperation rate for clinical pseudoarthrosis between the TLIF and the ALIF groups. The secondary outcomes measured the radiological pseudoarthrosis rate and identified risks for L5-S1 pseudoarthrosis development. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included; 49 patients (mean age, 62.9 years; 77.5% females) were in TLIF and 51 patients (mean age, 64.4 years; 70.6% females) were in the ALIF group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Thirteen (13%) patients with L5-S1 pseudoarthrosis required reoperation. Clinical pseudoarthrosis was higher in the TLIF group than in the ALIF group (12/49 vs. 1/51; P < 0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated a higher risk of L5-S1 pseudoarthrosis with TLIF than ALIF (risk ratio, 12.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.68-92.4; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed 4.86 times the risk of L5-S1 clinical pseudoarthrosis with TLIF than with ALIF (risk ratio, 4.86; 95% confidence interval 0.57-47; P = 0.17), but this ratio did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in reoperation risk for L5-S1 pseudarthrosis was observed based on the method of IF. rhBMP-2 was noted as a significant predictor.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-accepted surgical technique used to treat various lumbar degenerative pathologies. Recently, hyperlordotic cages have been introduced to create higher degrees of lordosis to the lumbar spine. There are little data currently available to define the radiographic benefits that these cages provide with stand-alone ALIF. The goal of the present study was to assess the effect of increasing cage angles on postoperative subsidence, sagittal alignment, and foraminal and disc height in patients who underwent single-level stand-alone ALIF surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive patients who underwent single-level ALIF by a single spine surgeon. Radiographic analysis included global lordosis, operative level of segmental lordosis, cage subsidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, edge loading, foraminal height, posterior disc height, anterior disc height, and adjacent-level lordosis. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were performed to analyze the relationship between cage angle and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in the study and divided into three groups based on cage angle: < 10° (n = 17), 10°-15° (n = 36), and > 15° (n = 19). Within the entire study cohort, there were significant improvements in disc and foraminal height, as well as segmental and global lordosis, at the final follow-up after single-level ALIF. However, when stratified by cage angle groups, patients with > 15° cages did not have any additional significant changes in global or segmental lordosis compared with those patients with smaller cage angles, but patients with > 15° cages showed greater risk of subsidence while also having significantly less improvements in foraminal height, posterior disc height, and average disc height compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with < 15° stand-alone ALIF cages showed improved average foraminal and disc (posterior, anterior, and average) height without sacrificing improvements in sagittal parameters or increasing risk of subsidence when compared to patients with hyperlordotic cages. The use of hyperlordotic cages > 15° did not provide spinal lordosis commensurate with the lordotic angle of the cage and had a greater risk of subsidence. Although this study was limited by a lack of patient-reported outcomes to correlate with radiographic results, these findings support the judicious use of hyperlordotic cages in stand-alone ALIF.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare pelvic and lumbosacral reference parameters with computed tomography in patients with low back pain (LBP) and a control group of asymptomatic patients to provide quantification data and morphological correlations for L5S1 transforaminal endoscopic approach (L5S1TEA). METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 100 patients with LBP and a control group of 100 individuals, with spinopelvic computed tomography. We measured lumbopelvic and L5S1 transforaminal approach parameters: maximum approach angle (maxAA) and minimum approach angle (minAA) and skin incision (maxSI and minSI), iliac crest (IC) projection at intersection point (ICPi), distance between the projected intersection of maxAA with the ilium (ICi) and the posterior limit of the IC (ΔICi-ICpost), and distance between ICi and spinous process (ΔICi-SP). RESULTS: Females and ICPi were increased in the LBP group: maxAA: 48.38° ± 5.09°; minAA:32.5° ± 3.90°; maxSI: 11.39 ± 1.86 cm; and minSI: 8.30 ± 1.48 cm. Ilium intersection was increased in males; IC projection at the highest point (ICPh) was higher than ICPi; maxAA intersected the ilium in 28% and minAA in 1.5% of cases; ICi was positively correlated with facet angle, ICPh, and ICPi and negatively with ΔICi-SP. CONCLUSIONS: Our results set preliminary reference values for L5S1TEA surgical planning. Besides higher ICPi, there were no differences between groups in measured parameters. Traditional IC height (ICPh) does not correspond to the point of intersection of the approach and is significantly higher than ICPi. ICi correlated to higher facet angle values, ICPh and ICPi grades, and lower ΔICi-SP. Potential conflict with the ilium is increased in the male population. IC is not impeditive of L5S1TEA in most cases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic lumbosacral instability is a rare but potentially devastating injury. These injuries are frequently associated with neurologic injury and often result in long-term disability. Despite their severity, radiographic findings can be subtle, and multiple reports exist in which these injuries were not recognized on initial imaging. Transverse process fractures, high-energy mechanisms, and other injury features have been suggested as indications for advanced imaging, which has a high degree of sensitivity in detecting unstable injuries. CASE PRESENTATION: A 21-year-old man presented to our level I trauma center after being ejected in a rollover motor vehicle collision. He sustained multiple injuries, including multiple lumbar transverse process fractures and a unilateral superior articular facet fracture of S1. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Initial supine computed tomography (CT) images showed no displacement of the fracture and no listhesis or instability. Subsequent upright imaging in a brace, however, demonstrated significant displacement of the fracture with dislocation of the contralateral L5-S1 facet joint and significant anterolisthesis. The patient underwent open posterior reduction and stabilization of L4-S1 followed by L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The patient demonstrated excellent alignment on postoperative imaging. At 3 months postoperatively, he had returned to work, was ambulating without assistance, and reported minimal back discomfort and no lower extremity pain, numbness, or weakness. CONCLUSION: This case serves as a warning that supine CT imaging alone may not be sufficient to rule out unstable lumbar spine injuries, such as traumatic L5-S1 instability, and that upright radiographs in these potentially unstable injuries may represent a hazard to patients. Fractures involving the pedicle, pars, or facet joints as well as multiple transverse process fractures and/or a high-energy mechanism of injury should all raise suspicion of instability and warrant additional imaging. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This article provides guidance on approaching treatment for patients with potential traumatic lumbosacral instability.