RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the best available mid- to long-term evidence of surgical procedures for the treatment of localized full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee. DESIGN: Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of Level 1 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), meta-analyses of RCTs and systematic reviews with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Data extracted included patient demographics, defect characteristics, clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as treatment failures. RESULTS: Six RCTs and 3 Level 1 systematic reviews were included. Two RCTs compared microfracture (MFx) to periosteum-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI-P), 1 to matrix-associated ACI (M-ACI) and 2 to osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT). One study compared OAT to collagen membrane covered ACI (ACI-C). The 3 Level 1 systematic reviews/meta-analyses assessed the outcome of MFx, OAT, and various ACI methods in RCTs. OAT showed significantly better outcomes compared with MFx. In the 2 RCTs comparing ACI-P and MFx, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were seen, whereas significantly better outcomes were reported for M-ACI versus MFx in 1 study including patients with larger defects (5 cm2), and for ACI-C versus OAT in terms of Cincinnati Score. Higher failure rates were reported for MFx compared with OAT and for OAT compared with ACI-C, while no significant differences in failure rates were observed for ACI-P compared to MFx. CONCLUSION: Restorative cartilage procedures (ACI-C or M-ACI and OAT) are associated with better long-term clinical outcomes including lower complication and failure rates when compared with reparative techniques (MFx). Among the restorative procedures, OAT seems to be inferior to ACI especially in larger defects after longer follow-up periods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I: Systematic review of Level I studies.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Cartílagos , Cartílago Articular , Humanos , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Condrocitos/trasplante , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Trasplante Autólogo/métodosRESUMEN
Knee cartilage defects caused by osteoarthritis are major musculoskeletal disorders, leading to joint necrosis or even disability if not intervened at early stage. Deep learning has demonstrated its effectiveness in computer-aided diagnosis, but it is time-consuming to prepare a large set of well-annotated data by experienced radiologists for model training. In this paper, we propose a semi-supervised framework to effectively use unlabeled data for better evaluation of knee cartilage defect grading. Our framework is developed based on the widely-used mean-teacher classification model, by designing a novel dual-consistency strategy to boost the consistency between the teacher and student models. The main contributions are three-fold: (1) We define an attention loss function to make the network focus on the cartilage regions, which can both achieve accurate attention masks and boost classification performance simultaneously; (2) Besides enforcing the consistency of classification results, we further design a novel attention consistency mechanism to ensure the focusing of the student and teacher networks on the same defect regions; (3) We introduce an aggregation approach to ensemble the slice-level classification outcomes for deriving the final subject-level diagnosis. Experimental results show that our proposed method can significantly improve both classification and localization performances of knee cartilage defects. Our code is available on https://github.com/King-HAW/DC-MT.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Aprendizaje Automático Supervisado , Cartílago , Diagnóstico por Computador , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study is to determine whether full-thickness tibiofemoral cartilage defects are predictive of incident radiographic OA, progression of radiographic OA, and progression to severe radiographic OA. Participants in the OA Initiative (n = 1317, 38.1% male, mean age 60.9 years SD 9.2) with baseline MRIs and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) OA grade 0-3 (none to moderate OA) were included. All participants had follow-up radiographs at mean 4.9 years (max 8.0). The effect of full-thickness defect presence, size, and location on risk of incident OA (KL grade 2+), overall progression of OA (increase in KL grade 1+ points), or compartment-specific OA progression was assessed with Cox proportional hazards modeling with adjustment for demographic factors, weight, and knee alignment. The yearly incidence of tibiofemoral OA was 0.3% (CI 0.2-0.4%); defect presence, size, and location were not associated with incident OA risk. The yearly rate of OA progression was 3.8% in participants without tibiofemoral full-thickness defects, 6.7% with medial defects, and 6.3% with lateral defects. Medial bipolar (kissing) lesions were an independent risk factor for OA progression as well as medial compartment progression. Lateral tibial-sided full-thickness defects increased risk of lateral progression (increase in lateral OARSI grade). In older adults, isolated full-thickness cartilage defects do not increase short-term risk of incident OA. However, in the setting of preexisting mild or moderate OA, medial bipolar (kissing) defects increase risk of overall OA progression (KL grade) as well as progression of medial compartment OA. Lateral tibial defects increase risk of lateral compartment OA progression. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.
Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ohio/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , RadiografíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine: (1) rates and risk factors for progression of lateral and medial full-thickness cartilage defect size in older adults without severe knee osteoarthritis (OA), and (2) whether risk factors for defect progression differ for knees with Kellgren-Lawrence OA grade 3 (moderate) OA versus grades 0-2 (none to mild) OA. METHODS: Three-hundred and eighty adults enrolled in the Osteoarthritis Initiative were included (43% male, mean age 63.0 SD 9.2 years). Ethical approval was obtained at all study sites prior to enrollment. All participants had full-thickness tibial or weight-bearing femoral condylar cartilage defects on baseline knee MRIs. Baseline OA grade was KL grade 3 in 71.3% and grades 0-2 in 21.7% of participants. Repeat MRIs were obtained at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Independent risk of progression in defect size due to demographic factors, knee alignment, OA grade, knee injury and surgery history, and baseline knee symptoms was determined by multivariate Cox proportional hazards and linear regression modeling. RESULTS: The average increase in defect size over 2 years for lateral defects was 0.18 cm2 (SD 0.60) and for medial defects was 0.49 cm2 (SD 1.09). Independent predictors of medical defect size progression were bipolar defects (beta 0.47 SE 0.08; p < 0.001), knee varus (per degree, beta 0.08 SE 0.03; p = 0.02) and increased weight (per kg, beta = 0.01 SE 0.004; p = 0.01). Independent predictors for lateral defect progression were larger baseline defect size (per 1.0 cm2, beta 0.14 SE 0.03; p < 0.001) and tibial sided defects (beta 0.12 SE 0.04) and degrees valgus (per degree, beta 0.04 SE 0.01; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Medial compartment full-thickness defects progress at a more rapid rate than lateral defects in older adults with minimal to moderate OA. Medial defect progression was greatest for bipolar defects in heavier adults with varus knees. Lateral defect progression was greatest for large tibial-sided defects in adults with valgus knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular/patología , Articulación de la Rodilla/patología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/patología , Anciano , Peso Corporal , Niño , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Soporte de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Focal cartilage defects of the knee are a substantial cause of pain and disability in active patients. There has been an emergence of randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical techniques to manage such injuries, including marrow stimulation (MS), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT). PURPOSE: A meta-analysis was conducted to determine if any single technique provides superior clinical results at intermediate follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched and supplemented with manual searches of PubMed and reference lists. Eligible studies consisted exclusively of randomized controlled trials comparing MS, ACI, or OAT techniques in patients with focal cartilage defects of the knee. The primary outcome of interest was function (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and pain at 24 months postoperatively. A meta-analysis using standardized mean differences was performed to provide a pooled estimate of effect comparing treatments. RESULTS: A total of 12 eligible randomized trials with a cumulative sample size of 765 patients (62% males) and a mean (±SD) lesion size of 3.9 ± 1.3 cm(2) were included in this review. There were 5 trials comparing ACI with MS, 3 comparing ACI with OAT, and 3 evaluating different generations of ACI. In a pooled analysis comparing ACI with MS, there was no difference in outcomes at 24-month follow-up for function (standardized mean difference, 0.47 [95% CI, -0.19 to 1.13]; P = .16) or pain (standardized mean difference, -0.13 [95% CI, -0.39 to 0.13]; P = .33). The comparisons of ACI to OAT or between different generations of ACI were not amenable to pooled analysis. Overall, 5 of the 6 trials concluded that there was no significant difference in functional outcomes between ACI and OAT or between generations of ACI. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between MS, ACI, and OAT in improving function and pain at intermediate-term follow-up. Further randomized trials with long-term outcomes are warranted.