RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction between micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation and "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in patients with refractory primary open-angle glaucoma. Methods: We included patients with primary open angle glaucoma with at least 12 months of follow-up. We collected and analyzed data on the preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes. The primary outcomes were a reduction of ≥20% of the baseline value (criterion A) and/or intraocular pressure between 6 and 21 mmHg (criterion B). Results: We included 128 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. The preoperative mean intraocular pressure was 25.53 ± 6.40 and 35.02 ± 12.57 mmHg in the micropulse- and "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation groups, respectively (p<0.001). The mean intraocular pressure was reduced significantly to 14.33 ± 3.40 and 15.37 ± 5.85 mmHg in the micropulse- and "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation groups at the last follow-up, respectively (p=0.110). The mean intraocular pressure reduction at 12 months was 11.20 ± 11.46 and 19.65 ± 13.22 mmHg in the micropulse- and "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation groups, respectively (p<0.001). The median preoperative logMAR visual acuity was 0.52 ± 0.69 and 1.75 ± 1.04 in the micropulse- and "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation groups, respectively (p<0.001). The mean visual acuity variation was −0.10 ± 0.35 and −0.074 ± 0.16 in the micropulse- and "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation, respectively (p=0.510). Preoperatively, the mean eye drops were 3.44 ± 1.38 and 2.89 ± 0.68 drugs in the micropulse- and "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation groups, respectively (p=0.017), but those were 2.06 ± 1.42 and 1.02 ± 1.46 at the end of the study in the "slow cook" and micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation groups, respectively (p<0.001). The success of criterion A was not significant between both groups. Compared with 11 eyes (17.74%) in the "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation group, 19 eyes (28.78%) in the micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation group showed complete success (p=0.171). For criterion B, 28 (42.42%) and 2 eyes (3.22%) showed complete success after micropulse- and "slow cook" transscleral cyclophotocoagulation, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: Both techniques reduced intraocular pressure effectively.

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether early-stage intraocular pressure can be modulated using a thermal face mask. Methods: In this prospective clinical study, healthy participants were randomized on a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to three mask groups: hypothermic (G1), normothermic (G2), and hyperthermic (G3). After randomization, 108 eyes from 108 participants were submitted to clinical evaluations, including measurement of initial intraocular pressure (T1). The thermal mask was then applied for 10 minutes, followed by a second evaluation of intraocular pressure (T2) and assessment of any side effects. Results: The hypothermic group (G1) showed a significant reduction in mean intraocular pressure between T1 (16.97 ± 2.59 mmHg) and T2 (14.97 ± 2.44 mmHg) (p<0.001). G2 showed no significant pressure difference between T1 (16.50 ± 2.55 mmHg) and T2 (17.00 ± 2.29 mmHg) (p=0.054). G3 showed a significant increase in pressure from T1 (16.53 ± 2.69 mmHg) to T2 (18.58 ± 2.95 mmHg) (p<0.001). At T1, there was no difference between the three study groups (p=0.823), but at T2, the mean values of G3 were significantly higher than those of G1 and G2 (p<0.00). Conclusion: Temperature was shown to significantly modify intraocular pressure. Thermal masks allow the application of temperature in a controlled, reproducible manner. Further studies are needed to assess the duration of these effects and whether they are reproducible in patients with pathologies that affect intraocular pressure.

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between blood pressure and intraocular pressure in treatmentnaive, non-glaucoma patients with different blood pressure statuses, focusing on the 24-h ocular volume and nocturnal blood pressure decline. Methods: Treatment-naive, non-glaucoma patients undergoing hypertension evaluation were enrolled as study participants. Simultaneous 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement and 24-h ocular volume recording with a contact lens sensor. We also compared ocular volume curve parameters between normotensive and hypertensive patients, as well as between those with and without nocturnal blood pressure decline. Results: A total of 21 patients, including 7 normotensive and 14 treatment-naive hypertensive individuals, were included in the study. of them, 11 were dippers and 10 were non-dippers. No significant difference in the 24-h ocular volume slope was observed between the hypertensive and normotensive patients (p=0.284). However, dippers had a significantly higher 24-h ocular volume slope (p=0.004) and nocturnal contact lens sensor output (p=0.041) than non-dippers. Conclusion: Nocturnal blood pressure decline, rather than the blood pressure level, is associated with the increased 24-h ocular volume slope and nocturnal ocular volume. Further studies are required to determine whether the acceleration of glaucoma progression in dippers is primarily due to low blood pressure, high intraocular pressure, or a combination of both.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of temperature-controlled pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) on structural and functional outcomes in a rabbit eye model in vivo. METHODS: Ten healthy New Zealand White rabbits underwent temperature-controlled PPV in the right eye (group A), using a device specifically designed to heat the infusion fluid/air and integrated into the vitrectomy machine, and conventional PPV in the left eye (group B). Both eyes received ophthalmic examination and electroretinography (ERG) before and 1 week postoperatively. After 1-week ERG, rabbits were enucleated and then sacrificed. Histological and immunohistochemical examinations were performed on enucleated eyes and expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin investigated. RESULTS: Postoperatively, only group B showed significantly decreased amplitude and increased latency of a-wave at 3 cd·s/m2 (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). Significant increase of b-wave latency at 0.01 cd·s/m2 was detected in both groups (p = 0.019 and 0.023, respectively). Postoperatively, amplitude of oscillatory potentials (OPs) increased significantly in group A (p = 0.023) and decreased in group B. In both groups, OPs latency significantly increased at 1-week test (P < 0.05). A greater number of eyes without structural retinal alterations was detected in group A compared to group B (6 vs 5, respectively). GFAP expression was higher in group B than group A, even if the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Temperature-controlled PPV resulted in more favorable functional and structural outcomes in rabbit eyes compared with conventional PPV, supporting the potential beneficial role of the intraoperative management of intraocular temperature in vitreoretinal surgery.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether novel pre- and postsurgical ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) measurements of the canine ciliary cleft (CC) are associated with postoperative ocular hypertension (POH) following cataract surgery and to explore the relationship between intraocular pressure and CC UBM measurements. METHODS: Following pharmacologic mydriasis, UBM images were obtained from 31 client-owned dogs before elective cataract surgery, immediately postsurgery, and 4 to 6 hours following surgery or while experiencing POH ≥ 25 mm Hg. Presurgery and the pre- to postsurgery change in CC measurements were assessed for association with POH using individual mixed-effects logistic regression models and forward variable selection models. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the relationship of intraocular pressure to UBM measurements within the same eye across multiple time points. RESULTS: Presurgical measurements were not predictive of POH development. An increase in pectinate ligament distance and CC area from presurgical baseline to immediate postsurgical measurement was associated with reduced odds of developing POH, while increasing CC length (from apex to mid point on the pectinate ligament) from pre- to postsurgery and immature cataracts was associated with increased odds of POH. CONCLUSIONs: The change in CC morphology following cataract surgery appears more impactful in the development of POH than individual variations in presurgery CC measurements. Several changes in the CC dimensions following surgery appear associated with POH risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This understanding of a potential mechanism of POH development opens new avenues for researching preventative measures associated with modifying surgical techniques to influence CC morphology following cataract surgery.

RESUMEN

An approximately 26-year-old, suspected female, red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) was presented with a history of chronic ocular changes of the left eye likely secondary to blunt trauma resulting in blindness and phthisis bulbi. Ophthalmic evaluation of OS revealed a large intraocular mass, 3+ aqueous flare indicating anterior uveitis, and severely decreased intraocular pressure measuring 5 mmHg. Ocular ultrasound revealed an abnormal, spherical shaped and hyperechoic lens, as well as hyperechoic material or a mass lesion in the posterior segment. An enucleation procedure was performed, and histopathology of the eye revealed no signs of neoplasia but instead intraocular osseous metaplasia with bone marrow and adipose tissue replacing the lens. Similar mass lesions were found in the retina and choroid. Multiple fractures in the scleral ossicle and cartilage correlated the intraocular lesions with a blunt traumatic event. A bioresorbable disk of porcine small intestine submucosa (BioSIS Vetrix®) was incorporated to relieve tension during closure. The graft sloughed during healing process, revealing a healed wound underneath. The BioSIS was not incorporated into the wound as designed but may have facilitated healing. This is the first report of intraocular osseous metaplasia in a raptor and the use of BioSIS Vetrix® with enucleation in an avian species.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In pediatric ophthalmology, calculating intra-ocular lens (IOL) power can be challenging. It is important to predict if the post-surgery refractive error (RE) will meet the intended refractive goal. In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors and predictors influencing RE outcomes in children undergoing IOL implantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study that involved 47 eyes with congenital cataracts underwent IOL implantation. Each patient underwent follow-up visits at two months and two years' post-surgery. The IOL power calculations were conducted using the Holladay 1 formula, and both the prediction error (PE) and absolute prediction error (APE) were calculated. RESULTS: The mean age was 6.52 ± 4.61 years, with an age range of 1-15 years. The mean IOL power was 20.31 ± 6.57 D, and the mean post-operative refraction was 1.31 ± 2.65 D. The mean of PE and APE were 0.67 ± 1.77 and 1.55 ± 1.06 D, respectively. Whereas PE was correlated to axial length with an R-value of - 0.29 (P = 0.04). The calculation method had a significant negative relationship with APE and PE, with coefficients of - 1.05 (P = 0.009) and - 1.81 (P = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSION: High astigmatism was associated with greater errors in the refractive outcome. The calculation methods had the most considerable impact on the post-operative RE. The customization of surgical approaches to accommodate individual characteristics is crucial. Further research with diverse subgroups is needed to comprehensively understand the influence of each factor.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

To evaluate changes in dry eye-related parameters after posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PC-PRL) implantation. This prospective study included 21 highly myopic patients (39 eyes) who underwent PC-PRL implantation at Lanzhou Huaxia Eye Hospital between January 2021 and June 2022, with a 3-month postoperative follow-up. In addition to routine preoperative examinations, dry eye assessments were conducted preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. These assessments included the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire score, non-invasive first tear break-up time (NIF-BUT), non-invasive average tear break-up time (NIA-BUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), meibomian gland loss (MGL) rate, and Schirmer I test (SIt). Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the differences in parameters across different time points, with pairwise comparisons conducted using the LSD-t test. After grouping, the Student's t-test was applied to compare normally distributed data, while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normally distributed data. Categorical data were analyzed using the chi-square test. A total of 21 patients (39 eyes) were included, comprising 10 males (19 eyes) and 11 females (20 eyes), aged 19 to 49 years (33.76 ± 7.87). All patients completed the 3-month follow-up. Significant differences in OSDI scores were observed pre- and post-surgery (P = 0.008), with a peak at one week post-surgery (P < 0.001), then stabilizing at one and three months post-surgery. Postoperative NIF-BUT and NIA-BUT significantly decreased (P < 0.001 for both) but returned to preoperative levels within three months. There were no significant changes in TMH, MGL, or SIt postoperatively (P > 0.05). Significant differences in dry eye parameters were observed between the dry eye and control groups before and after surgery (P < 0.001). PC-PRL implantation impacts tear film stability on the ocular surface after surgery, leading to varying degrees of dry eye symptoms in patients. After surgery, all dry eye parameters return to their preoperative levels within three months.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective and comparative study was to investigate the association of perimetry parameters on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes with diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: In cataract eyes with medicinally controlled POAG with no defects in the central visual field and mean deviation (MD) values of - 10 dB or better, EDoF and monofocal IOLs with the same platform except for echelette optics for EDoF were implanted in 22 and 24 eyes, respectively. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity at 3 to 18 cycles per degree (cpd), and automated perimetry using 30-2 and 10-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm programs were examined 3 months postoperatively. The influences of perimetry parameters including MD, foveal sensitivity (FS), and the means of the central four points (central MD and central FS) on CDVA and contrast sensitivity were evaluated using linear and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: In POAG eyes with EDoF IOLs, contrast sensitivities at 12 and 18 cpd were associated with 30-2 and 10-2 perimetry parameters. In POAG eyes with monofocal IOLs, associations of 30-2 parameters were found in CDVA and 3-cpd contrast sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The visual function of POAG eyes with EDoF IOLs was associated with perimetry parameters in high spatial frequency contrast sensitivity, which was different from that of POAG eyes with monofocal IOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry for Clinical Research: jRCTs032200218.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the biometric measurements obtained from the Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION and calculate the recommended intraocular lens power using the Barrett Formulae. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients who underwent biometry using the Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION. Flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL) from each device were measured and compared. These parameters were used to calculate the recommended IOL powers using the Barrett formula. RESULTS: The study included 252 eyes of 153 patients. The IOLMaster had the highest acquisition rate among the two biometers. The Pentacam obtained the shortest mean AL, the IOLMaster measured the highest mean keratometry values, and the ANTERION measured the highest mean ACD. In terms of pairwise comparisons, keratometry and axial length were not significantly different between the Pentacam-IOLMaster and ANTERION-IOLMaster groups, while the rest of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. In nontoric and toric eyes, 35-45% of patients recommended the same sphere of IOL power. In another 30-40%, the Pentacam and ANTERION recommended an IOL power one step greater than that of the IOLMaster-derived data. 50% of the study population recommended the same toric-cylinder IOL power. CONCLUSIONS: The Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION can reliably provide data for IOL power calculations; however, these data are not interchangeable. In nontoric and toric eyes, 35-45% of cases recommended the same sphere IOL power, and in another 30-40%, the Pentacam and ANTERION recommended one-step higher IOL power than the IOLMaster-derived data. In targeting emmetropia, selecting the first plus IOL power is advisable when using the Pentacam and ANTERION to approximate the IOL power calculations recommended by the IOLMaster 700.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: To observe early clinical outcome with lens position adjustment following the implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients were selected for this retrospective study. One eye from each patient received Toric ICL for astigmatism correction, and the other received non-astigmatic ICL surgery using horizontal position. Patients with higher postoperative arch height were selected, and their non-astigmatic eye clinical outcome were observed after ICL surgery at 1wk, 1, and 3mo. The clinical measurements included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), refractive state, corneal endothelium cell count, and arch height. Three months later, the ICL in each patient's non-astigmatic eye was adjusted to the vertical from the horizontal position. The results were compared before and 1wk, 1, and 3mo after adjustment. RESULTS: UCVA and IOP were significantly reduced 1wk after position adjustment compared to 1wk after ICL implantation (P<0.05). The patients demonstrated significantly reduced arch height and corneal endothelium cell count 1wk, 1, and 3mo after adjusting position compared to 1wk, 1, and 3mo after ICL implantation (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in refraction between 1wk, 1, and 3mo after ICL implantation and position adjustment (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Early positioning adjustment post-phakic ICL implantation can benefit patients with adjusted arch height or higher IOP. Despite the good clinical effects, the doctors should pay attention to the potential for adverse effects on UCVA and corneal endothelium cells following early position adjustment after posterior chamber phakic ICL implantation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intraocular  pressure (IOP) reduction is the approach that is commonly accepted for the control of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Medical therapy is typically the first-line of treatment. Laser trabeculoplasty (LT) is an alternative therapy; however, whether pharmaco-therapeutic options can be replaced by LT as the first-line is still debatable. METHODS: studies conducted till July 2023 that compared the efficacy of medications and LT for OAG were retrieved from databases such as Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We completed data extraction for outcomes of interest. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated and random-effects (RE) model was applied for analysis. RESULTS: A total of eighteen trials with 2024 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between therapies including laser trabeculoplasty (LT) and drug therapy in terms of successful IOP control (RR:1.30, 95%CI: 0.96, 1.78, P = 0.09, I2 = 96%), and reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) (MD:0.15; 95%CI:-0.55,0.85; P = 0.67, I2 = 62%). A significant reduction in drug therapy need in comparison to the group that received medicine (MD:-1.07; 95%CI;-1.21,-0.93), P < 0.001, with a low heterogeneity level (I2 = 16%). Adverse ocular events were more common in the argon laser group (RR:11.71, 95%CI: 9.93, 23.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both LT and topical drug therapy exhibit comparable rates of success and efficacy in reducing intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Selective LT is considered a safe treatment option with a reduced occurrence of adverse effects on the eyes while eliminating the possible adherence concerns associated with topical medicine and it can be considered a viable initial option for first OAG treatment. KEY MESSAGES: What is known Drug therapy is typically the 1st line of treatment for open-angle glaucoma. Although drugs have been shown to effectively reduce intraocular pressure (IOP), they are associated with a range of ocular and systemic negative effects which contributes to suboptimal adherence to medications. Laser trabeculoplasty (LT) is an alternative therapy; however, whether pharmaco-therapeutic options can be replaced by LT as the first-line is still debatable. What is new In terms of IOP reduction and IOP success rate, LT therapy was comparable in efficacy to drug therapy according to our findings. The safety profile of selective LT was found to be preferable compared to Argon LT.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To explore intraocular lens (IOL) preferences of United Kingdom-based (UK) refractive surgeons in cataract and refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery. METHODS: An online survey on IOL preferences (and reasons for their choice) in cataract and RLE surgery was distributed. It also enquired about implementing mini-monovision with extended depth of field (EDoF) IOLs, about utilising IOL mix-and-match (different IOL types in each eye), and at what level of corneal astigmatism they prefer toric lenses. RESULTS: Following an 81.6% response rate, thirty responses were analysed; median years of refractive surgery experience was 12.5. The most popular IOL choices for cataract surgery were EDoF lenses (30%), monofocals (20%), and trifocals (20%). The most cited reason for each was better overall visual outcomes (88.9%), fewer unwanted symptoms (66.7%) and best spectacle independence (66.7%), respectively. For RLE, EDoF remained most popular (36.7%), followed by trifocals (30%), and multifocals (16.7%) with the same reasons for choice cited above. Mini-monovision with EDoF lenses was well-regarded (83% recommend for most/select patients), unlike utilising IOL mix-and-match (60% did not recommend). 40% prefer toric IOLs for astigmatism of 1 dioptre (D) or higher, whilst 30% opt for them at < 1D. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced UK refractive surgeons prefer newer IOLs with enhanced optics; ≥50% of respondents favoured either EDoF or trifocals for a 'typical' cataract or RLE patient. Notably, respondents have a low corneal astigmatism threshold for toric lenses. Mini-monovision with EDoF IOLs was well-regarded, whilst mix-and-match of different IOL types was less recommended.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: To analyze the patient-reported-outcomes obtained after trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) bilateral implantation in Japanese patients using three different validated questionnaires. Methods: Fifty-three patients implanted with the FineVision HP IOLs (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. USA) were enrolled in this prospective-study. At 3-months, refraction (spherical equivalent [SE] and cylinder), logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were obtained. Specifically, patient-reported-outcomes were evaluated using the NEI VFQ-25, the Catquest-9SF, and the PRSIQ questionnaires. Results: The mean SE and refractive cylinder were 0.00±0.22D and -0.07±0.23D, respectively. A 98.11% of eyes were within ±0.50D and 100% were within ±1.00D of the SE. A 93.40% of the eyes showed equal or less than 0.50D of astigmatism and 100% of eyes equal or less than 1.00D. The mean value for monocular UDVA was -0.05±0.07 logMAR and the mean value for monocular CDVA was -0.07±0.06 logMAR. 87.74% and 92.45% of the eyes showed 20/20 or better monocular UDVA and CDVA, respectively, with 97.17% and 98.11% showing 20/25 or better for UDVA and CDVA, respectively. The NEI VFQ-25 outcomes showed very high scores across all categories, with mean general vision, distance and near activities values of 86.70±6.35, 96.23±7.72 and 92.14±10.74, respectively. The outcomes for the Catquest-9SF questionnaire showed that 90.57% of patients did not report difficulty in their everyday-life with their sight, and 100% of them were "very or quite satisfied" with their sight at present. The PRSIQ outcomes revealed that 100%, 98.11% and 98.11% of patients did not need glasses or contacts for far, intermediate and near vision, respectively. Conclusion: The results of the patient-reported-outcomes questionnaires indicated that patients implanted bilaterally with the FineVision HP IOL have high vision and health related quality-of-life scores, with a high spectacle independence rate and high patient satisfaction.

RESUMEN

Background: Residual astigmatism is common after cataract surgery involving implantation of an intraocular lens, yet the tolerance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens to astigmatism of different magnitudes and axes is poorly understood. Here we compared visual acuity and quality in the presence of induced astigmatism after implantation of a trifocal or extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens, the two widely used presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Methods: At least 3 months after implantation of a TFNT00 or ZXR00 intraocular lens, patients were analyzed by slit-lamp examination, non-contact tonometry, subjective refraction, iTrace aberrometry, and corneal topography. After correction of residual astigmatism, astigmatism of different magnitudes on different axes was induced using cylindrical lenses, and overall visual acuity was measured, while objective visual quality was measured using the Optical Quality Analysis System II. Subjects were also asked about subjective visual quality using the Visual Function-14 questionnaire. Results: Comparison of 18 individuals who received a trifocal lens and 19 who received an EDOF lens showed that objective visual quality was better in the EDOF group regardless of the magnitude or axis of the induced astigmatism. In both groups, astigmatism of at least -1.00 DC influenced distant vision more severely when the axis was 45° than 0° or 90°, meanwhile astigmatism of at least -1.50 DC influenced near and intermediate vision more severely when the axis was 45° than 0° or 90°. Conclusion: Trifocal or EDOF intraocular lenses are less tolerant of oblique astigmatism than astigmatism with or against the rule. EDOF lenses may provide better objective visual quality than trifocal lenses in the presence of astigmatism, regardless of its magnitude or axis.

RESUMEN

Accurate measurement of astigmatism parameters is the basis for prescribing modern means of optical correction. In recent years, another direction for correcting astigmatism has emerged - implantation of toric intraocular lenses (TIOL). PURPOSE: This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of various methods for measuring the parameters of regular astigmatism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 83 patients (122 eyes) with regular astigmatism exceeding 1.0 D. Three groups were formed depending on the type of astigmatism. Spherical and cylindrical (power and axis) components of refraction were determined using automatic refractometry. The results were refined with subjective tests: power and axis tests with a cross-cylinder. The criterion for diagnostic accuracy was the level of corrected visual acuity. To assess the impact of cylinder position on visual acuity, discrete deviations of the axis of trial astigmatic lenses from the correct position (determined based on subjective tests) were modeled at 5, 10, and 15 degrees in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions. RESULTS: In the overall sample of observations, coincidence of results was found only in one-third of cases, with a tendency for discrepancies in data between the two methods in nearly 70% of cases. Statistical processing revealed significant differences only in the magnitude of the cylinder in the group with against-the-rule astigmatism (p<0.0005). An increase in maximum visual acuity corrected based on subjective test data was noted. With a deviation of the cylinder axis from the correct position by 10-15 degrees, regardless of the type of astigmatism, a significant tendency for a decrease in visual acuity was identified. At the same time, with a deviation of the cylinder axis within 5 degrees, a significant decrease in visual acuity was noted only in with-the-rule astigmatism and counterclockwise deviation. CONCLUSION: To achieve maximum visual acuity in the correction of regular astigmatism, objective method data must be refined with subjective tests. The results of modeling the deviation of the axis of the corrective lens from the proper position can be considered when evaluating the functional outcomes of TIOL implantation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The combination of glaucoma and cataract occurs in 14.6-76% of cases, according to various sources. The goal of surgical treatment for these patients is to improve visual function while simultaneously reducing intraocular pressure. Due to the wide variety of proposed surgical methods, there is no consensus on the optimal management strategy for such patients. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the hypotensive effect and visual function outcomes of combined surgery for complicated cataract and glaucoma using the mesh drain made of digeland the xenocollagen drain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients in Group 1 (n=43; 48.3%) underwent combined cataract and glaucoma surgery with implantation of the digel drainage implant, while patients in Group 2 (n=46; 51.7%) underwent an identical operation with the xenocollagen implant. Preoperative tonometric pressure was 27.2±1.7 and 27.3±1.9 mm Hg; best corrected visual acuity was 0.35±0.21 and 0.33±0.18, respectively. The following surgical technique was employed. At 3.0-4.0 mm from the limbus, an intrascleral tunnel was created using a 2.2 mm sclerotome through the conjunctiva in the anteroposterior direction, exiting into the anterior chamber. Capsulorhexis and phacoaspiration were performed. The scleral tunnel was widened to 3 mm, and the intraocular lens was implanted. Penetrating basal coloboma of the iris was formed. The deep flap of the scleral tunnel was dissected from the flat part of the ciliary body and removed. The digel implant was shaped into a T-configuration, while the xenocollagen implant was used without modification. Each drainage was implanted into the intrascleral tunnel (one end directed into the anterior chamber, the other exiting the scleral tunnel). The conjunctiva was sutured with 10/0 stitches, and the paracenteses were hydrated. RESULTS: Over a 24-month follow-up period, the tonometric intraocular pressure in Groups 1 and 2 was 18.8 and 18.5 mm Hg, respectively, and the best corrected visual acuity was 0.51 and 0.58. CONCLUSION: The use of both drainages in the proposed combined surgery for complicated cataract and glaucoma results in similarly stable hypotensive outcomes and high visual function.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide data on the effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists on intraocular pressure (IOP). DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter. STUDY POPULATION: 1247 glaucoma surgery and treatment naïve eyes of 626 patients who were initiated on GLP-1R agonists compared to 1083 glaucoma surgery and treatment naïve eyes of 547 patients who were initiated on other oral antidiabetics. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: The University of California Health Data Warehouse was queried for patients exposed to GLP-1R agonists or other oral antidiabetics. Index date was defined as the date of first exposure to the medication. Eyes with at least one pre-exposure and one post-exposure tonometry record within 365 days of the index date were included in the analysis. Clinical and laboratory data elements were extracted from the database. Eyes were censored from the analysis upon exposure to glaucoma hypotensive medication or glaucoma surgery. ∆IOP was analyzed using a paired t-test. Regression analysis was conducted using generalized estimating equations (GEE) accounting for inter-eye correlation. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was ∆IOP after exposure to the medication. RESULTS: The median age of all included subjects was 66.2 years [IQR=18.3]; 607 (51.7%) were female, and 667 (56.9%) were Caucasian. Median pre-exposure IOP, HbA1c, and BMI were 15.2 mmHg [IQR=3.8], 7.5 [IQR=2.4], and 29.8 [IQR=9.4], respectively. 776 individuals (66.1%) had diabetes, with the median number of active oral antidiabetics being 1.0 [IQR=1.0], and 441 (37.5%) being insulin users. Several pre-exposure characteristics significantly differed between the GLP-1R agonist and the control group. The mean ∆IOP was -0.4±2.8 mmHg (paired t-test p<0.001) and -0.2±3.3 mmHg (paired t-test p = 0.297) in the GLP-1R agonist and other antidiabetics groups, respectively. Pre-exposure IOP was the only independent predictor of ΔIOP in multivariable GEE. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Although GLP-1R agonists were significantly associated with a decrease in IOP in the paired analysis, they were not associated with ΔIOP in multivariable GEE. Moreover, the difference between the ΔIOP in the two groups was small. Future prospective studies following a standardized dose and delivery method may provide further insights.

RESUMEN

Our goal was to assess the impact of retrobulbar anaesthesia on ocular pressure and perfusion development and to find out if there were systemic or biometric parameters of patients affecting them in order to understand the effect of retrobulbar anaesthesia better. Methods: Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) using a dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) were noted before and after retrobulbar anaesthesia (RBA) in combination with five minutes of oculopression at 40 mmHg in 134 patients. Only results with a quality Q 1-3 were considered for further statistical analysis. Systemic and ophthalmic parameters were noted and their impact was tested using linear regression. Results: IOP decreased from 18.9 ± 7.2 mmHg to 15.4 ± 6.3 mmHg (n = 71, p = 0.001) after first RBA. The dosage of midazolam administered during premedication was found to increase IOP significantly after first RBA (B = 3.75; R2 = 0.38). Ocular pulse amplitude decreased significantly from 3.8 ± 1.7 mmHg to 3.0 ± 1.9 mmHg after first RBA (n = 72, p < 0.001). This change was found to be dependent on the presence of diabetes mellitus (n = 68, p = 0.048). Conclusions: IOP and OPA decrease after RBA and oculopression. Caution is needed with midazolam premedication due to potential IOP increase. Patients with diabetes and pre-existing retinal or optic nerve damage should consider alternative anaesthesia methods, such as eye drops or general anaesthesia, due to the observed decrease in OPA after RBA and oculopression.

RESUMEN

Background/objectives: To compare the prevalence of intra-ocular inflammation (IOI) between brolucizumab and aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after intra-vitreal injections (IVI) and to compare the IOI odds ratios (ORs) of both therapies with the prevalence of septic endophthalmitis after IVI that was previously reported in the literature. Methods: A total of 468 IVI of brolucizumab (117 eyes) were compared with 2884 IVI of aflibercept (305 eyes) regarding IOI and occlusive retinal vasculitis (RV) from December 2021 to June 2023 in this retrospective study. The OR was calculated for both anti-VEGF agents and was compared with the relative risk of septic endophthalmitis after IVI. Results: There were four eyes with unilateral IOI related to brolucizumab (3.42%), one presenting uveitis (0.85%), two vitritis (1.71%) and the last one presenting occlusive RV (0.85%), compared with two eyes presenting unilateral IOI (anterior uveitis, 0.66%) and none with RV from the aflibercept cohort. The incidence of IOI per injection with brolucizumab (0.855%) was significantly higher compared with aflibercept (0.069%, p = 0.004). The OR of IOI related to brolucizumab IVI compared with septic endophthalmitis was 20 times greater (1.49 for aflibercept, p = 0.646, versus 20.15 for brolucizumab, p < 0.001). The OR of RV with brolucizumab compared with septic endophthalmitis was 4.6. Conclusion: Data from our department suggest a much higher risk of IOI and occlusive retinal vasculitis after brolucizumab when compared with aflibercept. The risk of IOI and severe sight-threatening complications related to brolucizumab is greater than the risk of septic endophthalmitis after any IVI.