RESUMEN

Background: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of Kirschner wires (KWs) as a blocking screw technique for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia treated with intramedullary nails (IMNs). Methods: Fifty-three patients were treated with KW-assisted IMN for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia via the blocking screw technique or Poller screw (PS) technique. The operation time, number of fluoroscopies, number of blocking screws used, blood loss and time to union were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the functional outcomes of the two groups were compared using range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Lysholm scores. Results: Compared with those in the PS group, the operation time in the KW group was significantly shorter, and the number of fluoroscopy procedures and amount of blood loss during KW surgery were also significantly lower (p = 0.014, 0.001, and 0.036, respectively). Regarding the functional outcomes, there were no significant differences in the ROM, VAS score, AOFAS score or Lysholm score between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia with nails, the use of KW as a blocking screw technique is safe and reliable.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distal tibial fractures represent common lower limb injuries, frequently accompanied by significant soft tissue damage. The optimal surgical approach for managing these fractures remains a topic of considerable debate. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the outcomes associated with retrograde intramedullary tibial nails (RTN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the context of treating extra-articular distal tibial fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on a cohort of 48 patients who sustained extra-articular distal tibial fractures between December 2019 and December 2021. Patients underwent either RTN or MIPO procedures. Various parameters, including operative duration, intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure, time to union, duration until full weight-bearing, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and complications, were recorded and compared between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in operative duration, time to union, angulation of the distal tibial coronal plane, or AOFAS scores between the RTN and MIPO groups. However, the RTN group had a higher average number of intraoperative fluoroscopy images (8.2 ± 2.3) compared to the MIPO group (4.1 ± 2.0). The RTN group demonstrated shorter average hospital stays (7.1 ± 1.4 days) and a quicker return to full weight-bearing (9.9 ± 1.3 weeks), which were significantly superior to the MIPO group (9.0 ± 2.0 days and 11.5 ± 1.5 weeks, respectively). In terms of complications, the RTN group had one case of superficial infection, whereas the MIPO group exhibited two cases of delayed union and nonunion, two occurrences of deep infection, and an additional three cases of superficial infection. CONCLUSIONS: Both RTN and MIPO are effective treatment options for extra-articular distal tibial fractures. However, RTN may offer superior outcomes in terms of decreased inpatient needs, faster return to full weight-bearing capacity, and a lower rate of complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: Fractures occurring at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the distal humerus in children are not commonly documented in the literature. Until this moment, there is no gold standard technique regarding its management and most surgeons treat it as a regular supracondylar humerus fracture by conventional pinning. This systematic review explores the relevant literature to assess the efficacy of different techniques. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Our literature search encompassed several online databases, including PUBMED/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. Data from articles that met our general inclusion criteria were extracted and categorized into treatment method groupings. Functional and cosmetic outcomes, demographic characteristics, and complications were the main parameters used to analyze the data. Results: Ten retrospective studies met our inclusion criteria with a total of 178 participants of unilateral pediatric distal humerus metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures. Most literature chose closed reduction and percutaneous pinning in seven articles, followed by elastic stable intramedullary nail technique used in three articles, then conservative treatment was chosen in two articles, while only one article used lateral miniplate and assisted K-wire and another article used combined closed reduction and percutaneous pinning and intramedullary K-wire. As regards the operation time; elastic stable intramedullary nails had the shortest time with a mean of 39.7 min (range: 37.5-41.9 min), while closed reduction and percutaneous pinning had the longest time with a mean of 75.47 min (range: 55.9-92.1 min). The shortest healing time was observed in miniplate with a mean of 7.2 weeks, while the most prolonged was in conservative management with a mean of 12 weeks and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning was a mean of 10 weeks. Regarding Flynn's criteria, all participants received excellent and good except in closed reduction and percutaneous pinning; 13 cases were fair and 2 cases were poor. Regarding complications, the most commonly observed complication after metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fracture was cubitus varus, the highest incidence was in conservative management (33% of cases), followed by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (10.9% of cases), the least incidence was observed in elastic stable intramedullary nails (3.77% of cases), and none of the cases treated with mini plate developed this complication. Other complications were observed only with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning; 8.5% of cases developed fixation loss, 6.2% of cases had a significantly reduced range of motion, and one case refractured. Conclusion: Pediatric distal humerus metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures should be distinguished from the more prevalent supracondylar humerus fractures, as conventional pinning techniques are associated with a higher incidence of complications and increased both operative and healing times.Level of evidence: III.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Distal locking is a challenging and time-consuming step in interlocked intramedullary nailing of long bone fractures. Current methods have limitations in terms of simplicity, universality, accuracy, speed, and safety. We propose a novel device and software for distal locking using computer vision. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The device consists of an universal ancillary clamp, a telescopic arm, a viewfinder clamp, and a radio-opaque cross. The software uses a camera photo from the C-arm intensifier and adjusts for geometric projection deformities. The software employs edge detection, Hough transform, perspective interpolation, and vector calculation algorithms to locate the distal hole center. The device and software were designed, manufactured, and tested using 3D CAD, FEM, DRR, and performance testing on phantom bones. RESULTS: The device and software showed high accuracy and precision of 98.7% and 99.2% respectively in locating the distal hole center and calculating the correctional vector. The device and software also showed high success ratio in drilling the hole and inserting the screw. The device and software reduced the radiation exposure for the surgeon and the patient. The success ratio of the device and software was validated by the physical testing, which simulated the real clinical scenario of distal locking. The radiation exposure was as low as 5 s with a radiation dose of 0.2mSv, drastically reducing radiation exposure during distal locking. DISCUSSION: Our device and software have several advantages over other distal locking methods, such as simplicity, universality, accuracy, speed, and safety. Our device and software also have some disadvantages, such as reliability and legislation. Our device and software can be compared with other distal locking methods based on these criteria. Our device and software have some limitations and challenges that need to be addressed in the future, such as clinical validation, and regulatory approval. CONCLUSION: The device showed promising results in terms of low-cost, reusability, low radiation exposure, high accuracy, fast distal locking, high stiffness, and adaptability. The device has several advantages over other distal locking techniques, such as free-hand technique, mechanical aiming devices, electromagnetic navigation systems, and computer-assisted systems. We believe that our device and software have the potential to revolutionize the distal locking technique and to improve the outcomes and quality of life of the patients with long bone fractures.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the outcomes of fibular intramedullary nails (IMNs) compared to traditional plates and screws (PS) in the surgical treatment of unstable ankle injuries in patients aged ≥65 years. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study involving 32 elderly patients with unstable ankle fractures treated with IMNs from 2010 to 2022. A comparison was made with 125 case-control patients treated with PS during the same period. Outcomes compared included postoperative wound and nonwound complications, surgical reduction, union rates, implant removal rates, and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. RESULTS: The IMN group had a higher incidence of high-energy injuries, open fractures, concomitant surgery, and perioperative transfusion requirements than the PS group. Additionally, the IMN group developed fewer wound-related (3.1% vs 20% in the PS group, P = .043) and non-wound-related complications (18.8% vs 39.2% in the PS group, P = .030). Both groups had similar initial weightbearing restrictions, fracture union times, mean OMAS scores, rates of malunion or nonunion, and delayed implant removal times. Notably, there were significant differences in the quality and adequacy of mortise alignment between the groups (good: 53.1% in IMN group vs 79.2% in PS group, fair: 46.9% in IMN group vs 20.8% in PS group, P = .006). CONCLUSION: Although the IMN group had an inferior outcome in the quality and adequacy of mortise reduction compared with the PS group, elderly patients with ankle fractures treated with IMN showed comparable functional outcomes to those treated with PS but with lower complication rates. Future research in this area will provide vital information for developing optimal treatment strategies, thereby improving the overall care of elderly patients with ankle fractures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: Elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) is a commonly used method for treating diaphyseal fractures of the tibia, but its application in Distal Tibial Diaphyseal Metaphyseal Junction (DTDMJ) fractures has been a subject of controversy. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Elastic stable intramedullary nail-Kirschner wire (E-K) technique in treating pediatric DTDMJ fractures, providing better clinical decision-making for clinicians in diagnosing and treating such fractures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients aged 3-9 years who received treatment at our hospital from January 2019-January 2021 for distal tibial diaphyseal metaphyseal junction (DTDMJ) fractures. Based on their surgical procedures, they were categorized into the Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nail-Kirschner wire group (E-K) and the ESIN group. Demographic data, surgical duration, clinical outcomes, complications, and imaging data were recorded. Results: The study included a total of 57 patients, with 24 cases in the E-K group and 33 cases in the ESIN group. There were 30 males and 27 females. The average age was (6.25 ± 1.59) years in the E-K group and (6.27 ± 1.48) years in the ESIN group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, age, weight, time from injury to surgery, follow-up time, side of injury, associated injuries, nail site infection, deep infection, and nail removal time (P > 0.05). Neither group experienced nonunion or refracture. The E-K group exhibited significantly lower coronal and sagittal plane angular values at the final follow-up compared to the ESIN group (P < 0.001). In the E-K group, the final follow-up coronal plane angle was 2.67 (1.09)°, while in the ESIN group, it was 6.55 (2.05)°. The final follow-up sagittal plane angle was 3.12 (1.54)° in the E-K group and 7.58 (1.48)° in the ESIN group. Both groups showed good alignment in the initial postoperative x-rays, with no statistically significant differences. However, during clinical healing, the ESIN group exhibited significant displacement, whereas the E-K group had minimal displacement, demonstrating a significant statistical difference (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the AOFAS joint function assessment between the two groups (P = 0.027). Conclusion: The E-K technique is a viable option for treating DTDMJ fractures in pediatric patients, with well-established clinical efficacy. Its advantages include a straightforward surgical procedure, safety, and a low incidence of severe complications.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures are challenging to treat and controversy exists on whether to treat them with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a circular frame (CF). This study aims to compare outcomes for intramedullary nail and circular frame in the treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective study at a major trauma center of all patients admitted with a grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture between January 2016 and January 2022. The primary outcome measures were major complications: non-union, malunion, refracture, DBI and amputation. Secondary outcome measures were time to union and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 32 patients in CF group and 23 patients in IMN group. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics of patients in both groups. Major complications were recorded in 13 limbs (54%) in IMN group and in 18 limbs (56%) in CF group which were not statistically significant (p = 0.797). Deep bone infection rates were noted in 4 (12.5%) in the CF group, compared to 1 (4%) in IMN group; however, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.240). Amputation rates as a result of infected non-unions were seen in 1 limb (4%) in IMN group and 2 limbs (6%) in CF group (p = 0.99). Median time to union was significantly shorter in IMN group at 30 weeks compared to 30 weeks for CF group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: IMN should be the treatment of choice in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture, but CF should be considered for delayed treatment and in patients with bone loss.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Compared to other techniques, poller screws with intramedullary nailing are technically simple, practical, and reproducible for the fixation of metaphyseal fractures. In addition, poller screws do not require special instruments or hardware and are minimally invasive. This review takes a historical perspective to evaluate poller screws holistically. A non-systematic search on PubMed was performed using 'Poller screw' or 'Blocking screw' to find early use of poller blocking screws. Relevant references from these primary studies were then followed up. In 1999, Krettek et al. first coined the term poller screws after the small metal bollards that block and direct traffic. Poller screws were introduced as an adjunct to aid the union of metaphyseal long bone fractures during intramedullary nailing. However, as more evidence was published, the true effectiveness of poller screws was not appreciated, leading to split opinions. Through our research, we have built upon our understanding of poller screws, and we present a novel classification of poller screws over the years while exploring our novel technique and what we believe to be the fourth generation of poller screws. Currently, there is a paucity of research focussing on poller screws. However, studying the original evidence regarding poller screws through the most recent articles has demonstrated a confusion of research in this field. Therefore, we suggest a more organised approach to classify the use of poller screws.

RESUMEN

Introduction Poller screws optimise fracture alignment in those fractures managed with intramedullary (IM) nails. They enhance stability, control nail insertion, and prevent translation. Indications encompass acute fractures, delayed unions/non-unions, and deformity. Classified into four generations, they've shown positive outcomes: improved alignment, reduced complications, and shorter healing. However, their pain management impact is understudied. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare opioid medication needs in tibial fractures managed with IM nails with and without poller screws. Methods Between January 2015 and December 2022, a retrospective analysis was conducted on tibial fractures treated at a major trauma centre. Patients primarily treated with IM nails were included. Patient and operation notes as well as radiographs, were reviewed to identify poller screw utilisation. Opioid medication data was collected and converted to "coverage" (days) and "strength" (morphine milligrams equivalent or MME). Two-tailed independent samples T-tests were performed to determine differences between patients treated with (n=205) and without poller screws (n=540). Results Patients with poller screws had fewer days with opioid prescriptions in the second post-operative month (6.8 vs. 8.9 days, p=0.038) and significantly lower opioid strength requirements across the first post-operative year (688.4 vs. 1295.4 MME, p=0.001), except the first month. Conclusion There is limited research on the connection between poller screws and pain. This study discusses their potential to reduce post-operative pain in tibial fractures. The results highlight the importance of using poller screws alongside IM. This combination appears to be effective in improving post-operative pain management and enhancing overall patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the midterm efficacy of Kirschner wires and elastic intramedullary nails after the closed reduction treatment of Judet 3 radial neck fractures in children. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients diagnosed with Judet type 3 radial neck fractures who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation at four tertiary hospitals from January 2019 to December 2021. Gender, age, fracture type, operation time, follow-up time, x-ray results and complications were collected. The recovery of elbow joint between the two internal fixation methods, elbow motion and complications at the last follow-up were compared. Results: The average operation time of EIN group was statistical significantly increased compared with KW group. There were no significant differences in MEPS score and ROM 3 months after surgery between the two groups, but the ROR Angle of EIN group was statistical significantly increased compared with KW group 3 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in MEPS score, ROM and ROR at the last follow-up. The incidence of complications in EIN group was significantly lower than that in KW group. Conclusion: The use of elastic intramedullary nails fixation or Kirschner wires fixation in the treatment of radial neck fractures in children can both achieve satisfactory fracture reduction and healing. Compared with elastic intramedullary nails, the operation time of Kirschner wires fixation is shorter, and the internal fixation does not need to be removed under anesthesia again, but the complication rate is higher.

RESUMEN

Aims & objectives: Prior to the popularization of magnetic intramedullary nails (MILNs), gradual deformity correction using external fixation was the norm in limb lengthening. Trauma literature has shown MILN via a suprapatellar approach (SP) to be associated with less knee pain than either an infrapatellar entry (IP) or external fixation. Yet, no research has investigated chronic knee pain and MILNs. We assessed differences in chronic knee pain following lengthening via an IP or SP approach with an MILN versus external fixation. Materials & methods: We reviewed 147 limbs (55 MILN/IP, 22 MILN/SP, 71 external fixator) in 124 patients who underwent tibial lengthening with ≥12 months follow-up between February 2012 and July 2020. Knee pain was assessed pre- and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months, with the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS) and numeric pain scale (0-10). Differences in knee pain outcomes were compared across methods, with subgroup analysis of MILN/SP and MILN/IP. Results: Mean LKSS was 96.3 for external fixation and 88.5 for MILN (P = .011). In the MILN subgroups, mean LKSS was 91.7 for IP and 85.3 for SP. The IP group reported a lesser mean pain score (0.6 versus 2.1) at 12 months. Bilateral nail recipients demonstrated no knee pain differences versus unilateral. At 12 months postoperative, external fixation had better knee outcomes. Conclusion: Tibial lengthening with external fixation was associated with less chronic anterior knee pain and better functional outcomes than MILN overall. In terms of MILN approach, IP surpassed SP on subjective pain scores. Larger tibial lengthening and knee pain studies are warranted.

RESUMEN

Background: Conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) includes a variety of operations and prior implants. The implant present before conversion may influence the outcome and complexity of the procedure. The group hypothesized that conversion arthroplasty for patients with intramedullary nails (IMNs) is more complex from a surgical and resource utilization perspective than for those with screw fixation. Methods: THA conversion cases were reviewed retrospectively from 2012 to 2020 from 6 surgeons across 3 institutions. The included cohort had 106 patients with fixation in the proximal femur for prior traumatic events. Demographics, operative data, outcomes, and implant information were collected from the medical record. The conversion THA group was categorized by preoperative fixation type: closed reduction and percutaneous pinning/screw fixation (CRPP) or IMN. Results: No age or body mass index differences were observed between the cohorts. Prior to conversion THA, IMN patients had undergone more surgeries than CRPP (P < .05). Perioperatively, the IMN cohort sustained increased blood loss (P < .001), had longer surgeries (P < .0001), had longer length of hospital stays (P < .01), necessitated trochanteric plates more often (P < .05), were readmitted more (P < .05), and required additional follow-up surgery (P < .01) than the CRPP cohort. Conclusions: Conversion THA of a prior IMN implant is associated with worse perioperative outcomes than conversion of a CRPP construct. Surgeons, health systems, and payors should consider these differences when caring for these distinct groups of patients.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Open Tibia fractures are associated with high rates of Fracture Related Infection (FRI). Given the negative outcomes and increased costs related to the latter, several prophylactic local antibiotic delivery methods have been proposed, aiming to decrease the FRI rate. Our objective with this study was to determine the effectiveness of antibiotic-coated intramedullary nails for open tibia FRI prevention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Queries were performed on Embase, PubMed, Lilacs and Cochrane data libraries. Seventeen studies were included for qualitative analysis and 2 studies were amenable for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Global infection, deep infection and non-union rates were 8.4%, 5.4% and 3.7% in the antibiotic-coated nail group and 22%, 14% and 14% in the non-antibiotic-coated nail group respectively. The meta-analysis showed a protective trend that favored the antibiotic-coated nail group although it didn't achieve statistical significance: deep infection Relative Risk (RR) (RR = 0.17 CI95% [0.02 - 1.31]); global infection RR = 0.36 CI95% [0.10 - 1.35]) and non-union (RR = 0.14 CI95% [0.02 - 1.22]), CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a favorable trend towards antibiotic-coated nail, with decreased risk of global infection, deep infection and non-union as compared to non-antibiotic-coated nail in patients with open tibia fractures. Nonetheless, higher level evidence studies are required to confirm our findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: There remains a lack of high-quality evidence on the treatment of pediatric femur shaft fractures. Therefore, treatment choices may still be based on personal preference of treating surgeons. To gain insight in considerations regarding treatment options, we conducted a survey among Dutch trauma and orthopedic surgeons. Methods: This survey was conducted in 2020, regarding treatment considerations for closed femoral shaft fractures in children in different age and weight groups. Results: One hundred forty-two surgeons were included in the analysis. 31% of participating surgeons considers surgical fixation in children of 2-4 years old, compared to 83% in children of 4-6 years old. In terms of weight, 30% considers surgery in children of 10-15 kg, compared to 77% considering surgery in children weighing 15-20 kg. While most surgeons find traction and spica cast suitable options for children younger than 4 years, a minority also considers these treatment modalities for children older than 4 (traction: 81% versus 19%, spica cast 63% versus 29% respectively). 33% of surgeons considers ESIN under 4 years of age, compared to 88% in children older than 4. Conclusion: An age of 4 years and a weight of 15 kg seem to be cut off points regarding preference of non-surgical versus surgical treatment of closed femoral shaft fractures. There is a wide range of ages and sizes for which treatment options are still being considered, sometimes differing from the national guideline. This questions guideline adherence, which may be due to a lack of available high-quality evidence.

RESUMEN

Background Fractures of long bones can sometimes lead to complications such as infection or nonunion, resulting in significant patient morbidity. Surgical intervention and antibiotics are often necessary to treat these complications. Antibiotic-impregnated cement/polymer-coated intramedullary nails have emerged as an effective surgical treatment for infected nonunion and open fractures. These implants elude high concentrations of antibiotics at the infection site while stabilizing the fracture. Extensive research has shown promising results, with success rates ranging from 60% to 100%. Benefits of these implants include stable fracture fixation, early weight-bearing, and reduced need for prolonged antibiotic therapy. However, concerns remain regarding antibiotic resistance and potential toxicity. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these implants in managing infected nonunion and open fractures of the femur and tibia. Methods This prospective hospital-based study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of antibiotic-impregnated cement/polymer-coated intramedullary nails for managing infected nonunion and open fractures of the femur and tibia. The study included patients aged 18 or older who received treatment with these implants between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022. Patients allergic to vancomycin or teicoplanin, with gap nonunion >2 cm, or lost to follow-up were excluded. Data on demographics, fracture details, previous treatment, surgery, antibiotics, and outcomes were collected using a structured proforma. Surgeries involved implant removal, debridement, culture testing, reaming, fracture reduction, and stabilization with an antibiotic-impregnated cement/polymer-coated intramedullary nail. Postoperatively, patients received antibiotics, had wound inspections, and were gradually allowed weight-bearing. Follow-up appointments and radiographic/laboratory assessments were conducted at regular intervals. The primary outcome was successful bone union, and secondary outcomes included time to union, infection rate, nonunion rate, and revision surgery. Results The majority of participants were male, with a mean age of 39.76 years. Most fractures were Gustilo-Anderson grade 3 (46.7%) and involved the tibia (73.3%). The mean bone gap after debridement was 1.3 cm. The median follow-up period was 8.21 months. Infection was controlled in 93.3% of patients, with the tibia being the most common site (70.0%). Successful bone union was achieved in 90.0% of patients, with a mean union rate of 22.13 weeks for tibial fractures and 17.21 weeks for femoral fractures. Among patients with bone union, 60.0% did not require additional procedures. Most patients had excellent bony (76.7%) and functional (70.0%) outcomes. The most common complications were the persistence of bone nonunion, impingement of proximal nail, and debonding of nail cement, each occurring in 10.0% of patients. Conclusion The study concluded that antibiotic-impregnated cement/polymer-coated intramedullary nails are effective in managing infected nonunion and open fractures of the femur and tibia. The procedure demonstrated a high success rate in controlling infections (93.3%) and achieving bone union (90.0%). Paley's criteria showed excellent bony and functional outcomes in the majority of patients. These findings support the use of this treatment option for such fractures.

RESUMEN

In this paper, we recount the medical trajectories of two male patients, both fourteen years of age, who sustained re-fractures of their radius and ulna six months post their primary diaphyseal fractures. Owing to the limited capacity for growth of the forearm bones between the ages of ten to sixteen years, many queries are engendered concerning apt treatment strategies. The pressing questions are whether these should be conservative or surgical and the precise method to be employed in surgical interventions. This discourse endeavors to demarcate preferred therapeutic options and shed light on a series of standard clinical dilemmas physicians encounter, along with an exhaustive scrutiny of existing literature.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Studies have shown an average postoperative hidden blood loss (HBL) of 473.29 ml and an average Hb loss of 16.71 g/l after intramedullary nailing. Reducing HBL has become a primary consideration for orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Patients with only tibial stem fractures who visited the study clinic between December 2019 and February 2022 were randomized into two groups using a computer-generated form. Two grams of tranexamic acid (TXA) (20 ml) or 20 ml of saline was injected into the medullary cavity before implantation of the intramedullary nail. On the morning of the surgery, as well as on days one, three and five after surgery, routine blood tests and analyses of CRP and interleukin-6 were completed. The primary outcomes were total blood loss (TBL), HBL, and blood transfusion, in which the TBL and HBL were calculated according to the Gross equation and the Nadler equation. Three months after surgery, the incidence of wound complications and thrombotic events, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, was recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (47 in the TXA group and 50 in the NS group) were analyzed; the TBL (252.10 ± 10.05 ml) and HBL (202.67 ± 11.86 ml) in the TXA group were significantly lower than the TBL (417.03 ± 14.60 ml) and HBL (373.85 ± 23.70 ml) in the NS group (p < 0.05). At the three month postoperative follow-up, two patients (4.25%) in the TXA group and three patients (6.00%) in the NS group developed deep vein thrombosis, with no significant difference in the incidence of thrombotic complications (p = 0.944). No postoperative deaths or wound complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intravenous and topical TXA reduces blood loss after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures without increasing the incidence of thrombotic events.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The use of bioresorbable magnesium (Mg)-based elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN) is highly promising for the treatment of pediatric long-bone fractures. Being fully resorbable, a removal surgery is not required, preventing repeated physical and psychological stress for the child. Further, the osteoconductive properties of the material support fracture healing. Nowadays, ESIN are exclusively implanted in a non-transphyseal manner to prevent growth discrepancies, although transphyseal implantation would often be required to guarantee optimized fracture stabilization. Here, we investigated the influence of trans-epiphyseally implanted Mg-Zinc (Zn)-Calcium (Ca) ESIN on the proximal tibial physis of juvenile sheep over a period of three years, until skeletal maturity was reached. We used the two alloying systems ZX10 (Mg-1Zn-0.3Ca, in wt%) and ZX00 (Mg-0.3Zn-0.4Ca, in wt%) for this study. To elaborate potential growth disturbances such as leg-length differences and axis deviations we used a combination of in vivo clinical computed tomography (cCT) and ex vivo micro CT (µCT), and also performed histology studies on the extracted bones to obtain information on the related tissue. Because there is a lack of long-term data regarding the degradation performance of magnesium-based implants, we used cCT and µCT data to evaluate the implant volume, gas volume and degradation rate of both alloying systems over a period of 148 weeks. We show that transepiphyseal implantation of Mg-Zn-Ca ESIN has no negative influence on the longitudinal bone growth in juvenile sheep, and that there is no axis deviation observed in all cases. We also illustrate that 95 % of the ESIN degraded over nearly three years, converging the time point of full resorption. We thus conclude that both, ZX10 and ZX00, constitute promising implant materials for the ESIN technique.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this historical review is to illustrate the progression and evolution of treatment for distal femur fractures. METHODS: Scientific literature was searched for descriptions of treatment for distal femur fractures to provide an in-depth overview of the topic, with emphasis on the evolution of surgical constructs used to treat these fractures. RESULTS: Prior to the 1950s, distal femur fractures were treated nonoperatively, resulting in considerable morbidity, limb deformity, and limited function. As principles of surgical intervention for fractures emerged in the 1950s, surgeons developed conventional straight plates to better stabilize distal femur fractures. Angle blade plates and dynamic condylar screws emerged out of this scaffolding to prevent post-treatment varus collapse. Meanwhile, intramedullary nails, and later, in the 1990s, locking screws, were introduced to minimize soft tissue disruption. Treatment failure led to the development of locking compression plates with the advantage of accommodating either locking or nonlocking screws. Despite this advancement, the rare but significant incidence of nonunion has not been eliminated, leading to the recognition of the biomechanical environment as important for prevention and the development of active plating techniques. CONCLUSION: Emphasis for the surgical treatment of distal femur fractures has incrementally progressed over time, with initial focus on complete stabilization of the fracture while the biological environment surrounding the fracture was ignored. Techniques slowly evolved to minimize soft tissue disruption, allow more ease of implant placement at the fracture site, and attend to the systemic health of the patient, while simultaneously ensuring appropriate fracture fixation. Through this dynamic process, the desired results of complete fracture healing and maximization of functional outcomes have emerged.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Radial and ulnar fractures are one of the most common fractures in children. When closed reduction of fractures fails, elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) fixation can mostly be used under the guidance of fluoroscopy. In this study, we evaluated the effect of ultrasound (US) as assistance for radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs. METHODS: There were 56 patients with midshaft radial and ulnar fractures included in our hospital from March 2019 to August 2021. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and according to the treatment method, they were divided into the US group (patients treated with US assistance) and the conventional group (C-group, patients treated with fluoroscopy guidance). All patients' clinical data were collected. Operation time, fluoroscopy times, radiation dose, and post-operative complications were analyzed. The elbow function was evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. RESULTS: There were 26 patients in the US group and 30 in the C-group. The average operation time was 44.5±19.4 min in the US group and 65.1±16.2 min in the C-group. There were significant differences regarding the surgery time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose between the groups (all p = 0.001). The average follow-up time was 13.5±3.1 months. No significant difference was found regarding radial nerve injury, extensor pollicis longus rupture, non-union or delayed union, ulnar nerve injury, or acute compartment syndrome. There was no difference in elbow function at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: US guidance can be adopted for the treatment of displaced radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs. It can significantly decrease fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, and duration of surgery.

Asunto(s)