RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) has a major impact on patients' quality of life and can lead to upper urinary tract complications. Intradetrusor botulinum toxin type A injections are administered as second-line treatment to these patients following the failure of anticholinergic agents. The aim of the DETOX 2 study is to propose a consensus definition of the failure of intradetrusor botulinum toxin injections for NDO in patients presenting spinal cord injury, spina bifida, or multiple sclerosis (MS) with self-catheterization. METHOD: This study followed the method adopted by the French National Authority for Health for recommendations by consensus. Based on a review of the literature and a preliminary survey, a steering committee compiled a questionnaire and selected a rating group comprising 16 experts from the Neuro-Urology Committee of the French Urology Association (cnuAFU) and Genulf. The experts were asked to complete the online questionnaire. At the end of the first round, all participants came together to discuss any disagreements and a second-round online questionnaire was completed to reach a consensus. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 16 experts approached completed both rounds of questionnaires. A strong consensus was reached for two proposals (median score = 9/10) which were therefore included in the definition from the first round: at least one repeat injection of the same botulinum toxin at the same dose must be given to rule out failure on technical grounds and a duration of efficacy <3 months must be considered a failure. At the end of round 2, a relative consensus was reached regarding the clinical criterion defining failure (median score = 7/10) and the urodynamic criterion of failure (median score = 8/10). An additional proposal was selected during this second round on the need for a voiding diary (median score = 8/10). CONCLUSION: The first consensus definition of failure of an intradetrusor injection of TB-A for NDO has been achieved with this study: persistence of detrusor overactivity with maximum detrusor pressures >40 cm H2O and/or a compliance issue and/or persistence of urinary incontinence and/or urgency and/or a number of daily self-catheterizations >8/day and/or efficacy <3 months. This study will help to standardize research on the failure of the intradetrusor botulinum toxin for NDO in clinical practice and clinical research.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva , Incontinencia Urinaria , Humanos , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Incontinencia Urinaria/complicaciones , UrodinámicaRESUMEN
OnabotulinumtoxinA intradetrusor injections are considered a highly effective localized therapy for refractory detrusor overactivity. However, despite evidence for distant systemic effects of onabotulinumtoxinA, little is known on potential systemic side effects following intradetrusor injections. Given that onabotulinumtoxinA is a highly potent toxin this is an important safety issue specifically with regard to repeat injections and parallel treatments with botulinum toxin. Hence, it was the purpose of this prospective study to investigate, using heart rate variability (HRV) analysis, whether onabotulinumtoxinA causes systemic effects on cardiac function following intradetrusor injections. Patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and age-matched healthy controls were recruited. Concomitant medication and diseases affecting the cardio-vascular system were exclusion criteria. A 3-channel resting electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded in supine position for 15min during four consecutive visits: 1) 2weeks prior onabotulinumtoxinA intradetrusor injections, 2) 10min prior injections, 3) 30min after injections, and 4) 6weeks after injections. NDO patients received intradetrusor injections (300units Botox®) between visits 2 and 3. The control group had no intervention. Short-term (5min) HRV analysis included assessment of frequency and time domain parameters. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with repeated measures and the t-test. Due to multiple comparisons, α was corrected to 0.0125 (Bonferroni method). Twelve healthy volunteers (5â, 7â; 46±12years old) and 12 NDO patients (5â, 7â; 46±13years old) completed all measurements. Comparing both groups, resting heart rate was significantly higher in the patients group at visit 4 only. No further significant differences in time and frequency domain parameters were discovered. Within the NDO group, standard deviation of the normal to normal intervals (SDNN) in the ECG demonstrated a significant decrease (1.70 to 1.53ms, p=0.003) from visit 3 to 4, whereas the total power (TP) significantly increased (3.05 to 3.29ms2, p=0.009) from visit 2 to 3. This increase subsided until visit 4. STUDY LIMITATIONS: single treatment investigation under resting conditions only. In conclusion, onabotulinumtoxinA intradetrusor injections do not seem to affect resting state cardiac function. Short-term changes such as total power might rather result from natural cardio-vascular responses to the procedure itself (e.g. discomfort, stress). Further detailed investigations also under physical stress and repeated injections are necessary to fully exclude systemic cardiac side effects of onabotulinumtoxinA intradetrusor injections.