RESUMEN

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine adjuvant RT's impact on survival in accordance with Sedlis criteria. Patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy between 2005 and 2022 at a single tertiary care institution were included. A multivariate analysis was performed to determinate if RT was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence or death. We also analysed whether there was a statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients who met only one or two Sedlis criteria, depending on whether they received adjuvant RT or not. 121 patients were included in this retrospective study, of whom 48 (39.7%) received adjuvant RT due to the presence of unfavourable pathological findings. In multivariate analysis, RT was not found to be a statistically significant prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.584) or disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.559). When comparing patients who met one or two Sedlis criteria, there were no statistically significant differences in OS between RT and no adjuvant treatment in either group. Since the selection of patients with cervical cancer eligible for surgery is becoming more accurate, adjuvant RT might not be necessary for patients with intermediate risk factors.

RESUMEN

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone in the treatment of cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors after operation.Methods:The clinical data of 210 patients with cervical cancer patients after operation in Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital between August 2014 to March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The postoperative pathology met the Sedlis standard. All patients were divided into RT alone group (100 cases) and CRT group (110 cases) according to the different adjuvant treatment regimens; and the efficacy and adverse reactions of both groups were also analyzed.Results:The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 82.8%, 81.5%, respectively in RT alone group and CRT group ; 5-year PFS rate was 80.6%, 77.4%, respectively in RT alone group and CRT group; and there were no statistically significant differences in the PFS of both groups ( χ2 = 0.29, P = 0.591). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 88.5%, 86.7%, respectively in RT alone group and CRT group; 5-year OS rate was 86.4%,82.6%, respectively in RT alone group and CRT group; and there were no statistically significant differences in the OS of both groups ( χ2 = 0.59, P = 0.443). The local recurrence rate was 8.0% (8/100) and 9.1% (10/110), respectively in RT alone group and CRT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 0.08, P = 0.778); the distant metastasis rate was 11.0% (11/100) and 12.7% (14/110), respectively in RT alone group and CRT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 0.15, P = 0.699); the incidence of bone marrow suppression was 42.0% (42 /100) and 61.8% (68/110), respectively in RT alone group and CRT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 8.25, P < 0.01). The incidence of gastrointestinal reactions was 23.0% (23/100) and 77.3% (85/110), respectively in RT alone group and CRT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 49.94, P < 0.01);the incidence of radiation cystitis was 3.0% (3/100) and 3.6% (4/110), respectively in RT alone group and CRT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 0.06, P = 0.798). The incidence of radiation proctitis was 5.0 %(5/100) and 4.5% (5/110), respectively in RT alone group and CRT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 0.02, P = 0.877). Conclusions:For cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors, CRT shows no survival benefit and increases the incidence of adverse reactions compared with RT alone.

RESUMEN

We aimed to evaluate whether adjuvant radiotherapy had a survival benefit for patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma with intermediate-risk factors. This study included patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy according to Wertheim-Okabayashi for stage IB1-IIA2 cervical carcinoma. Each patient had at least one intermediate-risk factor including tumour diameter ≥4 cm, deep stromal invasion, and positive lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Patients with lymph node metastasis, parametrial invasion, and positive surgical margins according to the final paraffin section were excluded. In total, 183 patients were included. Seventy-three (39.9%) patients had one, 85 (46.4%) had two, and 25 (13.7%) had three intermediate risk factors. Sixty-seven (36.6%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of stage, LVSI, and endometrial/uterine invasion between the groups that did and did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (p = .024, p = .018, and p = .001, respectively). These two groups were homogenised by performing propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. In the new matched cohort (n = 134), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 89.5% in the group that received adjuvant radiotherapy and 82% in the group that did not (HR: 0.484, 95% CI: [0.171-1.369]; p = .171). Also, receiving adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with an improvement in oncologic outcomes in patients with one, two, or more intermediate risk factors. In univariate analysis, none of the risk factors was associated with DFS. In conclusion, adjuvant radiotherapy had no favourable effect on survival outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma with only intermediate risk factors.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in cervical carcinoma is accepted as the standard of care when high-risk factors - positive surgical margins, lymph node metastasis, and parametrial involvement - are found in the surgical specimen. However, the necessity of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk factors - deep stromal invasion, positive LVSI, tumour diameter ≥4 cm - is controversial.What do the results of this study add? We compared patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy and those who did not. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of oncologic outcomes. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of pelvic and extrapelvic recurrence rates. The number of positive intermediate-risk factors did not affect survival. Moreover, age, tumour type, stage, number of removed lymph nodes, grade, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and endometrial/uterine invasion were not associated with DFS among patients with stage IB-IIA cervical carcinoma with only intermediate-risk factors.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Debate remains over the prognostic factors and the adjuvant treatment options in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma who possess intermediate-risk factors. Adjuvant radiotherapy can be ignored if initial adequate surgery has been performed in this patient group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

When presenting with major pathological risk factors, adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for oral cavity cancers (OCC) is recommended, but the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (POCRT) when only minor pathological risk factors are present is controversial. A systematic review following the PICO-PRISMA methodology (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42021267498) was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries. Studies assessing outcomes of POCRT in patients with solely minor risk factors (perineural invasion or lymph vascular invasion; pN1 single; DOI ≥ 5 mm; close margin < 2−5 mm; node-positive level IV or V; pT3 or pT4; multiple lymph nodes without ENE) were evaluated. A meta-analysis technique with a single-arm study was performed. Radiotherapy was combined with chemotherapy in all studies. One study only included patients treated with POCRT. In the other 12 studies, patients were treated with only PORT (12,883 patients) and with POCRT (10,663 patients). Among the patients treated with POCRT, the pooled 3 year OS rate was 72.9% (95%CI: 65.5−79.2%); the pooled 3 year DFS was 70.9% (95%CI: 48.8−86.2%); and the pooled LRFS was 69.8% (95%CI: 46.1−86.1%). Results are in favor of POCRT in terms of OS but not significant for DFS and LRFS, probably due to the heterogeneity of the included studies and a combination of different prognostic factors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There is a gap in knowledge regarding the ideal management of patients with early-stage cervical cancer and intermediate-risk features. Here, we present a meta-analysis of the published literature on oncological outcomes in these patients and determine trends in postoperative management. METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed were used for literature searches. The inclusion criteria were: English language articles including ≥ 10 patients, patients who underwent radical hysterectomy, nodes negative, studies reporting oncological outcomes and complications treatment-related and compare a surgery-only cohort with a radiotherapy cohort. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Combined relative risk was calculated using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model and a forest plot was drawn. RESULTS: We collected 183 manuscripts on early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy alone or with adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Regarding oncological outcomes, survival was reported in five studies. The relative risk of recurrence and the relative risk of mortality was similar in both groups independently whether receive or not adjuvant therapy. Most of the studies did not report significant differences regarding morbidity treatment related between the groups, except for a higher rate of lymphedema after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: We found that the relative risk of recurrence and mortality was similar in both groups not depending on adjuvant therapy. Therefore, whether radiotherapy adjuvant treatment is indicated remains a topic of debate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cervical cancer is still a common gynecolgical tumor in China. Radical surgery is often the first choice for the treatment of early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stage ⅠB-ⅡA), and postoperative pathological examination often has adverse prognostic factors affecting the survival. According to the NCCN guidelines, patients with cervical cancer who meet Sedlis criteria and have intermediate-risk factors (lymphatic vascular space involvement, tumor size or deep interstitial infiltration) are recommended to receive concurrent chemotherapy with postoperative pelvic external irradiation ± cisplatin. However, the diagnostic criteria, indications and methods of adjuvant therapy for patients with intermediate risk factors after early cervical cancer surgery are still controversial. In this article, research progress on the definition of intermediate risk factors for early cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy and adjuvant treatment was mainly reviewed.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different therapies on patients with cervical cancer (CC) with intermediate risk factors. METHODS: Clinicopathological data of 596 patients diagnosed with stage I-IIA CC at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University between January 2013 and November 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Of the patients, 500 patients received adjuvant therapy including chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CT + RT). Patients who displayed at least one intermediate risk factor number were screened. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 62 months. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort were 90.4% and 90.9%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that tumor stage, tumor size, pathological type, lymphovascular space invasion, and numbers of medium risk factors were not risk factors for early-stage CC. Compared with the control group, patients who received CT, RT, or CT + RT showed improved PFS and OS (P<0.05). The RT group had lower PFS and OS than the CT and CT + RT groups (P<0.05). Among the 318 patients with a single intermediate risk factor, 297 patients received CT, RT, and CT + RT benefit from adjuvant therapy (P<0.05). Of the 253 patients with high-risk factors, 220 patients received CT, RT and CT + RT get improved PFS and OS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received adjuvant therapy had better postoperative outcomes than those who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Patients had CT alone or CT combined with RT had better efficacy than those had RT alone.

RESUMEN

Objective To compare the prognosis of stage ⅠB-ⅡA cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients with intermediate risk factrs between adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and to explore the safety and effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Methods A total of 190 patients treated at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were selected and randomly divided into two groups: chemotherapy group (CT group, n=95) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (CCRT group, n=95). Ten patients lost to follow-up. Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank test were used for OS calculation and survival curve comparison. Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Results After a median follow-up of 36.7 months, 190 patients were evaluable. The incidence of G3/G4 blood system toxicity were 3.3% in CT group and 10.11% in CCRT group (P=0.019), the incidence of severe gastrointestinal toxicity were 4.4% in CT group and 17.98% in CCRT group, the incidence of radiation-related response was 22.48%. There was no significant difference in the local recurrence rate or distant recurrence rate between two groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in PFS and OS between two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference between postoperative chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy on stage ⅠB-ⅡA cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients with intermediate risk facfors, but the adverse reactions of postoperative chemotherapy are significantly reduced compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of receiving no adjuvant treatment (NAT) or radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 Stage IB1-IB3 cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Baskent University School of Medicine's Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Ankara, Turkey between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016. In total, 134 women with at least two intermediate risk factors (positive LVSI, deep stromal invasion, and tumor size ≥4 cm) were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: NAT and radiotherapy. RESULTS: There were 66 patients in the NAT group and 68 in the radiotherapy group. The median follow-up time was 61.05 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were similar in both groups (84.1% vs 82.9%, respectively; P=0.57), while the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 80.2% and 78.2% in the NAT and radiotherapy groups, respectively (P=0.25). Most importantly, both groups had similar local recurrence rates: 8 (12.1%) in the NAT group and 9 (13.2%) in the radiotherapy group (P=0.82). Multivariant analyses showed that the only independent risk factor for recurrence was tumor size ≥4 cm with a hazard ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.12-5.24; P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant treatment improved neither DFS nor local recurrence rates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The current study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) combined with intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of 558 patients who were submitted to radical surgery for Stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. A total of 172 of those 558 patients were considered intermediate-risk according to the GOG criteria. Among those 172 patients, 102 were subjected to CT combined with ICRT (CT+ICRT) and the remaining 70 patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). The 3-year disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and complications of each group were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in 3-year DFS or OS of the patients submitted to CT+ICRT and CCRT. Importantly, the frequencies of grade III to IV acute complications were significantly higher in patients submitted to CCRT than in those treated with CT+ICRT (Hematologic, P = 0.016; Gastrointestinal, P = 0.041; Genitourinary, P = 0.019). Moreover, the frequencies of grade III-IV late complications in patients treated with CCRT were significantly higher compared with CT+ICRT-treated patients (Gastrointestinal, P = 0.026; Genitourinary, P = 0.026; Lower extremity edema, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative adjuvant CT+ICRT treatment achieved equivalent 3-year DFS and OS but low complication rate compared to CCRT treatment in early stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: At present, extensive hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection are preferred for early-stage cervical cancer. However, additional adjuvant therapy could be considered if there is a risk for recurrence. Postoperative pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy are recommended for patients with high risk factors. The treatment regimen for patients with intermediate-risk factors, however, remains unclear. We, thus, performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), grade III/IV hematologic toxicity and grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) groups. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase to identify relevant studies published before November 30, 2018 to compare CRT with RT as a postoperative adjuvant therapy in early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors. We used Stata (version 14.0) to calculate odds risks (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled data was assessed by the fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Of the 428 identified studies, only 9 were eligible and included in our analysis (CRT: n = 870; RT: n = 932). CRT significantly prolonged RFS (OR = 3.43, 95% CI 2.08-5.67, P = 0.000) and OS (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.30-2.50, P = 0.000). The occurrence rate of grade III/IV hematologic toxicity (OR = 16.07, 95% CI 6.47-39.93, P = 0.000) was significantly higher in CRT, while grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity was ambiguous for CRT and RT with an OR of 1.91 (95% CI 0.95-3.83, P = 0.069). CONCLUSIONS: For early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors, CRT can dramatically improve RFS and OS compared with RT. Apart from the increase in grade III/IV hematologic toxicity, CRT was well tolerated and accepted treatment for early-stage cervical cancer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare the curative effect of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and radiation therapy (RT) alone on early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors. Methods: Clinical data of patients with early stage (ⅠB-ⅡA) cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2008 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients with more than two intermediate-risk factors, including lymphatic vascular infiltration, depth of cervical stromal infiltration >1/2 cm or tumor size >4 cm, were screened. Among them, 80 patients were divided into the RT group, 137 patients were divided into the CCRT group. The survivals of these patients were analyzed. Results: At the end of the follow-up period, a total of 22 patients were dead, one patient was alive with neoplasm. There were 23 patients who occurred recurrence/ metastasis, 14 of them were in the RT group and 9 were in the CCRT group. The 5-year progression free survival (PFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of the entire cohort were 89.9% and 89.8%, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate of RT group was 82.4%, the 5-year PFS rate of CCRT group was 94.1%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.013). The 5-year OS rate of RT group was 85.1%, the 5-year OS rate of CCRT group was 92.7%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.049). Univariate analysis showed that therapeutic modality was associated with the 5-year DFS and OS of early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that therapeutic modality was an independent prognostic factor of favorable PFS (RR=3.741, 95% CI: 1.506-9.289, P=0.004) and OS (RR=2.754, 95%CI=1.143-6.637, P=0.024). Neither of the two groups occurred severe anemia. However, the incidence of mild and moderate anemia in the CCRT group was higher than that of RT group (P<0.001). The incidence of leukocytopenia severer than grade Ⅲ in the CCRT group was significantly higher than that of RT group (P<0.001). However, the patients could recover quickly with the treatment of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Conclusion: Postoperative CCRT improves the survival of early stage cervical cancer patients with two or more intermediate-risk factors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine if postoperative cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) improves the outcome in stage IA/IIB cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors, when compared with radiation therapy (RT) alone, and identify the potential eligible populations for this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 1,240 patients with stage IA/IIB cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in our hospital between January 2008 and December 2011. Of the 1,240 patients, 436 displayed 1 or more intermediate risk factors. Of these, we screened 306 patients who underwent RT only or CCRT. We analyzed the effects of CCRT on survival and prognosis. RESULTS: The 5-year progress-free survival (PFS) in the CCRT group was superior to that in the RT-only group (96.0% vs 89.0%, respectively; P=0.031). The 5-year overall survivals (OSs) were not different between the 2 groups (P=0.141). Compared with RT-only group, CCRT did not improve PFS or OS in patients with 1 risk factor, large tumor size, or deep stromal invasion (P>0.05). Compared with RT-only group, CCRT improved PFS (97.9% vs 82.8%; P=0.017) but did not increase OS (97.9% vs 89.7%; P=0.109) in patients with lymphovascular space invasion plus deep stromal invasion/large tumor size. OS (92.3% vs 70.6%; P=0.048) and PFS (92.3% vs 64.7%; P=0.020) in the CCRT group were superior to those in the RT-only group with 3 risk factors. Compared with RT-only group, CCRT was an independent prognostic factor for favorable PFS (hazard ratio [HR] =0.238; 95% CI =0.0827-0.697, P=0.009) and OS (HR =0.192; 95% CI =0.069-0.533, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Postoperative CCRT improved survival in stage IA/IIB cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors. Patients with 2 or more intermediate risk factors, including lymphovascular space invasion, may benefit from CCRT.

RESUMEN

Objective@#To compare the curative effect of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and radiation therapy (RT) alone on early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors.@*Methods@#Clinical data of patients with early stage (ⅠB-ⅡA) cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2008 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients with more than two intermediate-risk factors, including lymphatic vascular infiltration, depth of cervical stromal infiltration >1/2 cm or tumor size >4 cm, were screened. Among them, 80 patients were divided into the RT group, 137 patients were divided into the CCRT group. The survivals of these patients were analyzed.@*Results@#At the end of the follow-up period, a total of 22 patients were dead, one patient was alive with neoplasm. There were 23 patients who occurred recurrence/ metastasis, 14 of them were in the RT group and 9 were in the CCRT group. The 5-year progression free survival (PFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of the entire cohort were 89.9% and 89.8%, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate of RT group was 82.4%, the 5-year PFS rate of CCRT group was 94.1%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.013). The 5-year OS rate of RT group was 85.1%, the 5-year OS rate of CCRT group was 92.7%, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.049). Univariate analysis showed that therapeutic modality was associated with the 5-year DFS and OS of early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that therapeutic modality was an independent prognostic factor of favorable PFS (RR=3.741, 95% CI: 1.506-9.289, P=0.004) and OS (RR=2.754, 95%CI=1.143-6.637, P=0.024). Neither of the two groups occurred severe anemia. However, the incidence of mild and moderate anemia in the CCRT group was higher than that of RT group (P<0.001). The incidence of leukocytopenia severer than grade Ⅲ in the CCRT group was significantly higher than that of RT group (P<0.001). However, the patients could recover quickly with the treatment of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.@*Conclusion@#Postoperative CCRT improves the survival of early stage cervical cancer patients with two or more intermediate-risk factors.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Gynecologic Oncology group (GOG) 0263 trial is currently exploring whether adding chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy improves recurrence-free and/or overall survival in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients with pathologic intermediate-risk factors. Using the National Cancer Data Base, we evaluated the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy over adjuvant radiotherapy alone in the community practice setting. MATERIALS: The analysis included 869 stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy retrieving intermediate-risk factors justifying adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy were delivered in 440 and 429 patients, respectively. Chi-square test assessed the distribution of variables in each group and the overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Proportional hazard models were performed to evaluate the impact of the different prognostic factors on survival and propensity score analysis adjusted variables imbalanced distribution. RESULTS: Adding chemotherapy to ART did not show a survival benefit at 48months median follow-up; the 5-year overall survival was 87% and 81% (p=0.6) in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy groups, respectively. On univariate analysis, age older than 60, a higher comorbidity score, and stage IIA were significantly associated with worse survival, while none of the other covariates were significant prognosticator on multivariate analysis. The same findings held after propensity score analysis. CONCLUSION: Our analysis could not detect a significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy over adjuvant radiotherapy in women with intermediate-risk factors. Until GOG 0263 results become available, the benefits of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be considered on an individual basis within a multidisciplinary approach.

Asunto(s)