RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) were established to individualize the treatment of high-risk (HR) and intermediate-high-risk (IHR) pulmonary embolism (PE) patients, which pose a challenge in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of all HR and IHR acute PE patients consulted by PERT CELZAT between September 2017 and October 2022. The patient population was divided into four different treatment methods: anticoagulation alone (AC), systemic thrombolysis (ST), surgical embolectomy (SE), and catheter-directed therapies (CDTx). Baseline clinical characteristics, risk stratification, PE severity parameters, and treatment outcomes were compared between the four groups. RESULTS: Of the 110 patients with HR and IHR PE, 67 (61%) patients were treated with AC only, 11 (10%) with ST, 15 (14%) underwent SE, and 17 (15%) were treated with CTDx. The most common treatment option in the HR group was reperfusion therapy, used in 20/24 (83%) cases, including ST in 7 (29%) patients, SE in 5 (21%) patients, and CTDx in 8 (33%) patients. In contrast, IHR patients were treated with AC alone in 63/86 (73%) cases. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9/24 (37.5%) in the HR group and 4/86 (4.7%) in the IHR group. CONCLUSIONS: The number of advanced procedures aimed at reperfusion was substantially higher in the HR group than in the IHR PE group. Despite the common use of advanced reperfusion techniques in the HR group, patient mortality remained high. There is a need further to optimize the treatment of patients with HR PE to improve outcomes.

RESUMEN

We present an extremely rare case of a patient with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, complicated with stroke as a form of paradoxical embolism through a previously unknown patent foramen ovale. We reviewed the literature for indications, efficacy, and safety of this procedure, as well as for experience on this technique in patients with patent foramen ovale. LEARNING POINTS: Some authors propose percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy as an aggressive treatment of intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism.Pending clinical trials, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy seems to reduce right ventricle overload in these patients, with rare adverse effects.To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of stroke as a complication of the procedure. These patients should be screened for patent foramen ovale before the procedure.

RESUMEN

Background: The management of intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is controversial with increasing interest in more aggressive treatment approaches than anticoagulation alone. Case summary: We describe the case series of four consecutive patients who presented to emergency room for acute shortness of breath. They were diagnosed with intermediate-high-risk acute PE based on the computed tomography pulmonary angiography and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) findings and the elevated simplified PE score index. They received bolus of 5 mg thrombolytics recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) administered through peripheral intravenous (i.v.) line followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 2 mg/h along with unfractionated heparin (UFH) at a rate of 500 mg/h for additional ≤10 h. There after the dose of UFH was increased to reach a therapeutic level. Rapid clinical improvement and also improvement in TTE parameters were noted at discharge. Patients were discharged home on oral anticoagulation. Discussion: Intermediate-high-risk acute PE carries increased risk of mortality and morbidities. Catheter-directed thrombolysis uses a low rtPA dose for local thrombolysis and is associated with low bleeding risk; however it is expensive and requires expertise and human resources. Low-dose rtPA through a peripheral i.v. line might be safe and effective in the treatment of patient with intermediate-high-risk acute PE. This therapeutic approach is readily available at most medical centres, can be started in the emergency room (ER), and can be alternative to catheter-directed thrombolysis nowadays during the COVID-19 era and in hospitals at the periphery and with limited resources.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. There has been little change in PE mortality rates over the past two decades making this an appealing area for innovation and development. AREAS COVERED: While anticoagulation (AC) and systemic thrombolysis (ST) are the mainstay treatments for high-risk PE and intermediate-high-risk PE with decompensation, advancements in catheter- based therapies offer potential alternatives. Areas covered here will include present guidelines for PE treatment and the landscape of catheter-directed therapies with a focus on the FlowTriever (FT) Retrieval System. Available safety and efficacy data will be reviewed. An online search via Google Scholar and PubMed with the keywords INARI Flowtriever, venous thromboembolism, and pulmonary embolism, alongside bibliographies of published articles, was undertaken as a review of the literature on the FlowTriever system for this device overview. EXPERT OPINION: The five-year outlook on the role of catheter-directed therapies in the management of PE includes continued innovation in catheter-directed therapies and a number of high-quality trials on the horizon.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after unfractionated heparin (UFH) bolus for the treatment of intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism. Materials and Methods: On the basis of initial treatment, 81 patients were divided into two groups: DOAC after UFH bolus infusion group (group D; n=32) and conventional therapy group (group C; n=49). The frequency of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding within 6 months were compared. In addition, hospitalization length and thrombus reduction rate in the pulmonary artery on computed tomography (CT) at the chronic phase were assessed. Results: Recurrence of VTE was found in one (3.1%) and three patients (6.1%) (P=1.00) in groups D and C, respectively, whereas no bleeding events was found in group D and 8.2% of patients in group C (P=0.15). Group D showed shorter hospitalization (7.2±2.3 days) than group C (15.7±9.9 days; P<0.001). In the subset of patients with serial CT assessment (group D, n=20; group C, n=38), almost all thrombus of pulmonary artery were disappeared and the thrombus reduction rates were similar between the two groups (group D, 99.5%; group C, 97.1%; P=0.59). Conclusion: DOAC administration immediately after UFH bolus treatment has the same efficacy and safety, whereas hospitalization days were significantly shorter than the conventional treatment group.

RESUMEN

Pulmonary embolism represents the third most common cause of cardiovascular death in the United States. Reperfusion therapeutic strategies such as systemic thrombolysis, catheter directed therapies, surgical pulmonary embolectomy, and cardiopulmonary support devices are currently available for patients with high- and intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism. However, deciding on optimal therapy may be challenging. Pulmonary embolism response teams have been designed to facilitate multidisciplinary decision-making with the goal to improve quality of care for complex cases with pulmonary embolism. Herein, we discuss the current role and strategies on how to leverage the strengths from pulmonary embolism response teams, its possible worldwide adoption, and implementation to improve survival and change the paradigm in the care of a potentially deadly disease.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We report the case of a 61-year-old man who presented at the Emergency Department (ED), complaining of sudden-onset dyspnea and chest pain after a long flight from Tokyo to Houston. Considering his clinical stability and sPESI 0, enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID was started for 24 h, and the patient was then considered for early discharge with apixaban 10 mg BID. Direct-factor Xa inhibition did not improve extensive thrombus burden and right ventricular dysfunction despite D-dimer measurement reduction. Because of the treatment failure, we considered thrombolysis. Currently, recommendations to use thrombolysis in patients under non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) do not exist. Hence, the one dose of apixaban was stopped, and 12 h later, we performed successful thrombolysis. A systematic review from 2007 to 2017 did not identify any cases related to NOACs failure to reduce thrombus burdens in patients with PE and persistent right ventricular dysfunction. We also did not find any evidence of cases that reported strategies for urgent thrombolysis in PE patients on NOACs. To the best of our knowledge, apixaban's failure to reduce thrombus burden, persistent right ventricular dysfunction, and a NOACs-thrombolysis bridge in patients with PE on apixaban has not been previously described. Both the bedside risk stratification and the therapeutic failures should alert clinicians in the ED to the potential limitations of low-molecular-weight heparin, NOACs therapy, and sPESI in the setting of intermediate-high-risk PE.

Asunto(s)