RESUMEN
The Adenomatoid Odontogenic Tumour (AOT) is more than 100 years old, known by different names and the term AOT was coined in 1969 by Philipsen and Birn. AOT frequently occurs in intra-osseous location in gnathic skeleton and rarely seen in peripheral forms. These are rare odontogenic tumours, accounting for 2.2--7.1% of all odontogenic tumours, whereas the central or intraosseous variant of AOT in follicular and extra-follicular presentation, accounts for 95.6% of all AOTs. The peripheral variant presents as a gingival mass, which may cause slight saucerization of alveolar bone or might not affect the bone at all. These peripheral variants constitute 4.4% or less, of all AOTs of the gnathic skeleton. Here, we present a rare case of a peripheral variant of AOT in a 35-years-old female, 1.5 to 2 cm in dimension seen on the labial gingiva in right canine-premolar area. The lesion showed marked bone loss in 13 and 14 teeth region, causing mobility of 13. Histopathology showed a well encapsulated tumour mass with metaplastic bone in the capsule. A conventional AOT with ductal and rosette pattern was seen with tumour droplets and amyloid like material. The case clinically presented a moderately aggressive behaviour.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease of the supporting tissues of the teeth caused by specific microorganisms, resulting in destruction of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. Progressive loss of alveolar bone is the salient feature of periodontal disease. Accurate detection of periodontal disease with the use of radiographs helps in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. AIMS: The present study aims to compare the efficacy of conventional intraoral periapical (IOPA) and direct digital radiographs (RVG) in detecting interdental alveolar bone loss using intrasurgical (IS) measurements as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients elected to undergo periodontal flap surgery with periodontitis computing to 60 interdental alveolar defects on mandibular first molars were considered. IOPA and RVG were captured using standardized techniques. Bone loss measurements in IOPA and RVG were compared to the IS measurements. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis was carried out using student t test and ANOVA with the help of SPSS software and p-value <0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: Both IOPA and RVG underestimated the bone loss measurements when compared to IS measurements which was statistically significant (p<0.0001). Bone loss measurements in RVG were closer to IS measurements than IOPA. CONCLUSION: Both the radiographic techniques IOPA and RVG underestimated bone loss by 1.5-2.5 mm. RVG was superior to IOPA for the detection of interdental bone loss due to reduced time and radiation exposure to obtain the same diagnostic information.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Presence of furcation involvement indicates advanced periodontitis, and a potentially less-favorable prognosis, for the affected tooth and its diagnosis has always been an enigma. The present study was carried out to measure and correlate the interdental and interradicular bone loss in patients suffering from periodontitis using radiovisuography (RVG) for the purpose of early furcation diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients suffering from chronic generalized periodontitis and with furcation involvement in mandibular molars were selected. Under standardized conditions, RVGs were taken and the morphologic measurements defining the furcation areas were recorded and analyzed. RESULT: Interradicular bone loss of about 0.8 mm or more, was observed in the study subjects only when the bone loss at the interdental area was minimal of 3.7 mm. The correlation between the interradicular and the interdental bone loss was statistically highly significant (T-test, P < 0.001). A stronger correlation was observed in subjects above 40 years of age as compared with the younger subjects. There was not much difference in the degree of correlation between the interradicular and the interdental bone loss when compared in the context of gender. CONCLUSION: The very first millimeter of interradicular bone loss was seen when the interdental bone loss was around 4 mm. Therefore, to detect the earliest lesions of furcations, the interdental bone loss can be kept as an approximate guide for the comprehensive diagnosis and management of such sites/patients. The current investigation paves the path for future longitudinal studies with larger samples to ascertain these findings.