RESUMEN

Introduction The current medical curriculum lacks comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI)-focused training, potentially impacting future healthcare delivery. This study addresses the critical gap in AI training within medical education, particularly in India, by assessing medical students' awareness, perceptions, readiness, confidence, and ethical considerations regarding AI in healthcare. Our findings underscore the necessity of integrating AI competencies into medical education to prepare future healthcare professionals for an AI-driven landscape. Method After obtaining ethics approval, we conducted a cross-sectional study on Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students from the 2019-2023 batch. An exploratory survey using a validated questionnaire was employed to obtain medical students' current understanding and awareness of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, perceptions, readiness, confidence, and ethical considerations in utilizing AI technologies in clinical practice. Results The survey received 217 responses from 2019-2023 MBBS students. We found a mean percentage of awareness score of 44.74%, a mean percentage perception score of 68.96%, a mean percentage readiness score of 91.32%, a mean percentage confidence score of 58.48%, and a mean percentage ethics importance score of 69.27%. Males had higher awareness, confidence, and readiness scores. Conversely, females scored slightly higher in perception and the importance of ethics consideration, although not statistically significant. Junior batches outperform senior batches in perception, confidence, and readiness scores; in contrast, the awareness and ethics importance scores do not show significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion Our study indicates a generally positive outlook toward AI's potential to enhance healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. The study suggests a strong inclination toward further education and practical training focused on AI in healthcare, considering a solid recognition of the significance of ethical implications related to AI in healthcare. These findings highlight the importance of fostering AI literacy within medical education curricula and underscore the necessity for ongoing evaluation and adaptation to ensure that future healthcare professionals are equipped to navigate the complexities of AI in healthcare delivery while upholding ethical standards.

RESUMEN

In the recent past, in order to achieve our national goal of 'health for all', National Medical Commission and Government of India made competency based medical education (CBME) mandatory in all Indian medical colleges. By undergoing CBME, the Indian Medical Graduate is expected to achieve the five roles of Clinician, Communicator, Leader and Member of the health care, Professional and Lifelong learner. This article is an overview of CBME, its relevant terminologies and knowledge-gaps. The purpose is to share these changes in medical education with practicing Otolaryngologists of India. It also discusses the various challenges regarding this already- suggested implementation process for clinical academicians, which could be counterproductive to the expected national aim and goal.

RESUMEN

Medical education in India is confronting a charismatic transformation from traditional curriculum to competency-based medical education (CBME). It is more clinically oriented; skill-based and claims to produce competent Indian medical graduates. CBME has divided subjects into competencies and related topics are scattered over different competencies. The intention behind teaching should not be merely students' learning, but contemplation should be towards concept building, imagination, creativity, self-motivated thinking, and the rightful application of knowledge in day-to-day life. Hence a well-formulated, organized, effective, and practically assessable design and an efficient approach are essential not only to link these spread-over pieces of the topic but to teach that topic in a certain flow and rhythm to a medical student also. Therefore, a stepwise approach has been proposed to teach a CBME-driven curriculum to medical students.

RESUMEN

The new competency-based medical education undergraduate curriculum (CBMC) was launched for the 2019 admission batch of MBBS students. The programme is designed to create an "Indian Medical Graduate" (IMG) possessing the requisite knowledge, skills, attitudes, values and responsiveness, so that the graduate may function appropriately and effectively as a physician of first contact with the community while being globally relevant. Given that implementation of this curriculum is still in its infancy across the country, we stand to gain from a unified approach to its implementation. Phase I of the curriculum includes anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry along with professional and personal development modules. Biochemistry enjoys an enviable position in the medical curriculum as it explains the molecular basis of diseases. We present an appraisal of the curriculum in Biochemistry by reviewing the components against Harden's six themes which are considered when planning or developing a curriculum. Further, five core components of CBME are selected on the basis of three research papers to characterize underlying assumptions of CBME to suggest ways of logical implementation for achieving the competencies expected of the Indian Medical Graduate. The insight gained shall help students to be equipped with competencies which they shall be able to use in their day- to- day work, which shall ultimately help benefit patient care and the society at large. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12291-022-01088-y.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In India, competency-based medical education (CBME) is gaining foothold to transform the medical student into a doctor fulfilling community and societal needs. With that end in view the teaching faculty are getting sensitized and trained by the National Faculty Development Program (FDP). We aimed to assess the awareness about FDP among teaching faculty in medical colleges and study the attitude and perceived barriers to implementation of CBME. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional, electronically distributed, questionnaire-based study was conducted among medical faculty in India. The questionnaire identified participants' awareness, attitude, and perceived barriers to CBME. Descriptive analysis was employed for continuous variables and internal comparison employing Chi-square test with α <0.05 for statistical significance. RESULTS: Among 251 participants 90.2% faculties from private institutes had undergone FDP as against 71% from Government sector (P = 0.008). We observed that 92.4% were aware, 80.2% had undergone Curriculum Implementation Support Program and 95.2% did agree that CBME will improve the medical education system. Major challenges perceived were high student to faculty ratio (67.7%), ill developed infrastructure (41.4%) and difficulties in assessment (41.1%). The popular solutions suggested were to increase faculty strength (73.7%), improve infrastructure (69.3%), extra remuneration (35.9%) and increase administrative support (30.7%). There was significant difference of opinions between teaching faculty of government and private sector (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Most of the medical faculty are aware of the need and have acquired a positive attitude towards enforcement of CBME. However, significant barriers do exist in the form of manpower and resources which need to be addressed.

RESUMEN

The new competency-based medical education curriculum for Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery is being implemented in a phased manner in medical colleges across India since the year 2019. The Graduate Medical Education Regulations enlist a total of 35 global competencies for the five roles expected of an Indian medical graduate, the roles being clinician, communicator, leader, professional, and life-long learner. Along with an effective implementation of the new curriculum, both in spirit and in action, it is imperative to assess the listed competencies. The new curriculum demands a more careful and mature selection of assessment tools, based on the competency and its expected level of achievement. It is these two variables that make choosing the right assessment method not just a matter of choice, but also of expertise. An array of tools in our armamentarium can sometimes separate confuse and the teachers. So, using the right tool, in the right context, at the right juncture, supplemented by other tools, and backed by constructive feedback, can help nurture the good intent ingrained in the competency-based curriculum. Hence, an attempt was made to compile an assessment toolbox for various global competencies. A PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar search, with relevant keywords was carried out. To the initially extracted 90,121 articles, limitations were applied, duplicates were removed and screening for assessment of global competencies and its attributes was done to select 232 articles. Finally, 31 articles were used for designing the proposed toolbox. Prioritization for the tools for the global competencies was based on thorough literature review and extensive discussion. The evolved assessment toolbox is presented in this article, which would help teachers pick the most useful methods of assessment for global competencies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical Council of India has suggested competency-based curriculum for undergraduate students to make it learner centric. One-month "Foundation course" was introduced at the beginning of the course to promote better adaptation to the new curriculum. A cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze the feedback from students who attended the foundation course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All first-year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery students who underwent 1-month foundation course were included in the study. The course was conducted in six modules. All the sessions were handled by efficient resource people and conducted in an interactive manner. A form in which response against each topic/talk was graded as average, good, or excellent was used to obtain the feedback. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 16 software. Responses among various modules were subjected to Chi-square two-sided test with Yates's correction. RESULTS: A total of 98 students (32 males and 66 females) attended the foundation course of 21 days. Among the modules conducted, basic skill training module was scored excellent (67%) remarks, followed by sports and extracurricular activities (64.6%) (P = 0.8806). Among the skill training module, both basic life support training and first aid on medicine/pediatrics achieved 92% excellent score. One of the orientation module sessions, research methodology, scored least. The descending order of excellent remarks was skill module > sports and extracurricular activities > field visit to the community and primary health center > orientation modules > enhancement of language. CONCLUSION: Attention should be given to include more topics concerned to the modules of skill training and extracurricular activities in upcoming years. Foundation courses can increase the confidence and better adaptability of the students toward a new environment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Today's Bachelor in Medicine, Bachelor in Surgery (MBBS) students will become Indian Medical Graduates in future. Emotional intelligence (EI) is an essential component in the making of an Indian Medical Graduate. There is increasing stress during medical training. The study was conducted to compare the association of EI score and perceived stress scale (PSS) among average and excellent undergraduate medical students. The secondary objective was to find the predictors of excellent academic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted after institutional ethics committee approval. All 522 consented students studying in 2nd, 4th, 7th, and 9th semesters filled up established pre-validated questionnaires ; Schutteself report EI test and Cohen's perceived stress scale. Sociodemographic details of the respondents were collected. Average attendance and marks of previous semester examinations of all included students were collected from academic cell of the institution. All students were grouped into three groups: average, good, and excellent performers from the marks collected. Comparison of EI scores and PSS scores was done between students in excellent and average groups using unpaired t-test. RESULTS: Of the 94.9% of respondents, 78.2% of the students were included in the study. The mean EI and PSS scores were 123 ± 14.5 and 22.8 ± 13.9, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in EI scores between average and excellent performers ([123.8 ± 18.7] vs. [127.7 ± 16]; P - 0.089). Perceived stress was lower in excellent performers ([20.9 ± 11.1] vs. [24.8 ± 15.0]; P - 0.01). EI was associated with better performance in clinical year students. EI was negatively correlated to perceived stress. CONCLUSION: Our study provides predictors of excellent academic performances among Indian medical undergraduates. This study suggests introduction of extracurricular activities in ongoing undergraduate curricular syllabus. It imparts awareness among students about the importance of attending classes. This study bestows higher EI and lower perceived stress to better academic performance.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite well-described code of conduct for physician the recent increase in litigation against doctors is an issue of concern which says that doctors and health professionals are confronted with many ethical problems regularly. The aim of the present study was to see the ability to recognize different bioethical issues in relation to patient care among 3rd semester undergraduate students and also the change in the pattern of recognition of bioethical issues after formal training. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out using self-administered questionnaire among the fifty 3rd semester undergraduate MBBS students. Each question was designed in a "Likert scale" pattern carrying a minimum score of 1 (1 = strongly disagree) and maximum score of 5 (5 = strongly agree). After 6 months of training and bedside clinical exposure, students were assessed again with same set of questionnaire. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: All of the respondents in the study group were of the opinion that medical ethics is very important but only 24% aware about existence of ethics committee in the institute. Changes has been observed after clinical exposure in response like disclosure of patient's condition to close relatives (agreed 54% versus 84% pre and postexposure, respectively) and discussion of related ethical issues with clinical case discussion (agreed 74% versus 94% pre and postexposure, respectively). Some of the issues needs further clarification even after clinical exposure like doctors must not refuse to do abortion (56% disagreed and 38% agreed), consent regarding treatment in children (60% disagreed and 32% agreed), and uses of branded versus generic drugs (76% generic and 26% branded). CONCLUSION: There is a need to stress the importance of ethical practice in the undergraduate curriculum to make the doctors confident enough to deal the ethical dilemma for themselves and better professional efficiency.

RESUMEN

The purpose of the present review is to examine the new competency-based undergraduate curriculum in community medicine against the established frameworks and criteria and suggest the way forward for achieving competencies expected of the Indian Medical Graduate (IMG). The new Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2018, is based on Harden's concept of the curriculum. Hence, we reviewed the components of new curriculum against Harden's conceptualization of various components of the curriculum, and since it claims it is competency-based, we used Tyler's Goal/Objective-Based Evaluation. The new undergraduate curriculum has shown a move toward integration of course content and defined the competencies in more measurable terms. However, it appears that the earlier information-based curriculum corresponding to book chapters ("topics") has been modified to specify higher cognitive domains with no explicit link between the IMG level curriculum outcomes to subject level intended learning outcomes (ILOs). The mechanism to link ILOs to assessment is also not clear and so needs more clarity. The assessment system hinted at in the current document is mostly based on the existing conventional system of 50% as pass cutoff, etc., against criterion-referenced assessment applicable to competencies that need to be performed. Furthermore, there is no guidance on the creation of educational opportunities and environment for students and faculty - perhaps it is left to "Curriculum Implementation Support Programme (CISP) Workshops." Hence, the need for preparing a roadmap/blueprint to learning experiences and assessment methods and levels and milestones to be reached at various phases of MBBS and during internship is required.

Asunto(s)