RESUMEN

Background: Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a type of incentive system where employees receive monetary rewards for meeting predefined standards. While previous research has investigated the relationship between PFP and health outcomes, the focus has primarily been on mental health. Few studies have explored the impact of PFP on specific physical symptoms like pain. Methods: Data from the Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS) was analyzed, encompassing 20,815 subjects with information on PFP and low back pain (LBP). The associations between types of base pay (BP) and PFP with LBP were examined using multivariate logistic regression models, taking into account a directed acyclic graph (DAG). The interaction of overtime work was further explored using stratified logistic regression models and the relative excess risk for interaction. Results: The odds ratio (OR) for individuals receiving both BP and PFP was statistically significant at 1.19 (95% CI 1.04-1.35) compared to those with BP only. However, when the DAG approach was applied and necessary correction variables were adjusted, the statistical significance indicating a relationship between PFP and LBP vanished. In scenarios without PFP and with overtime work, the OR related to LBP was significant at 1.54 (95% CI 1.35-1.75). With the presence of PFP, the OR increased to 2.02 (95% CI 1.66-2.45). Conclusion: Pay-for-performance may influence not just psychological symptoms but also LBP in workers, particularly in conjunction with overtime work. The impact of management practices related to overtime work on health outcomes warrants further emphasis in research.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The importance of day surgery as a less costly alternative compared to conventional inpatient hospital stays is growing internationally. The rate of day surgery activities has increased across Europe. However, this trend has been heterogeneous across countries, and might still be below its potential. Since payment systems affect how providers offer care, they represent a policy instrument to further increase the rate of day surgeries. In this paper, we review international strategies to promote day surgery with a particular focus on payment models for 13 OECD countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, England, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland). We conduct a cross-country comparison based on an email survey of health policy experts and a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed papers and grey literature. Our research shows that all countries aim to strengthen day surgery activity to increase health system efficiency. Several countries used financial and non-financial policy measures to overcome misaligned incentive structures and promote day surgery activity. Financial incentives for day surgery can serve as a policy instrument to promote change. We recommend embedding these incentives in a comprehensive approach of restructuring health systems. In addition, we encourage countries to monitor and evaluate the effect of changes to payment systems on day surgeries to allow for more informed decision-making.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peers are an important determinant of health and well-being during late adolescence; however, there is limited quantitative research examining peer influence. Previous peer network research with adolescents faced methodological limitations and difficulties recruiting young people. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether a web-based peer network survey is effective at recruiting adolescent peer networks by comparing 2 strategies for reimbursement. METHODS: This study will use a 2-group randomized trial design to test the effectiveness of reimbursements for peer referral in a web-based cross-sectional peer network survey. Young people aged 16-18 years recruited through Instagram, Snapchat, and a survey panel will be randomized to receive either scaled group reimbursement (the experimental group) or fixed individual reimbursement (the control group). All participants will receive a reimbursement of Aus $5 (US $3.70) for their own survey completion. In the experimental group (scaled group reimbursement), all participants within a peer network will receive an additional Aus $5 (US $3.70) voucher for each referred participant who completes the study, up to a maximum total value of Aus $30 (US $22.20) per participant. In the control group (fixed individual reimbursement), participants will only be reimbursed for their own survey completion. Participants' peer networks are assessed during the survey by asking about their close friends. A unique survey link will be generated to share with the participant's nominated friends for the recruitment of secondary participants. Outcomes are the proportion of a participant's peer network and the number of referred peers who complete the survey. The required sample size is 306 primary participants. Using a multilevel logistic regression model, we will assess the effect of the reimbursement intervention on the proportion of primary participants' close friends who complete the survey. The secondary aim is to determine participant characteristics that are associated with successfully recruiting close friends. Young people aged 16-18 years were involved in the development of the study design through focus groups and interviews (n=26). RESULTS: Participant recruitment commenced in 2022. CONCLUSIONS: A longitudinal web-based social network study could provide important data on how social networks and their influence change over time. This trial aims to determine whether scaled group reimbursement can increase the number of peers referred. The outcomes of this trial will improve the recruitment of young people to web-based network studies of sensitive health issues. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44813.

RESUMEN

Background: Global payment system is a kind of case-based payment system which pays for 60 commonly surgical operations by the average cost for each specified surgery case in Iran. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of this payment system on the number of services provided for each global surgical case versus fee-for-service (FFS) for the same operation. Methods: This is a retrospective study based on data from a large referral teaching hospital in Iran in the period of 2012-2015. Information related to 46 surgeries was performed which both global and FFS documents were gathered (N=7672). Statistical analysis was done on variables including Length of stay (LOS), Blood test (BT), Radiology (RA) and a mixed variable named VC (visit and consult number). Data were analyzed by a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model using STATA 11. Results: Descriptive analysis showed the mean of each service was significantly (p<0.001) higher in the FFS document's group rather than the global payment group. Regression estimates showed the amounts of each service including LOS, BT, RA and VC were significantly (p<0.001) higher in FFS surgery than global documents for the 15 selected surgery. LOS and BT have shown a significantly higher amount in 100% of surgeries for FFS above global document. Same as for Radiology test and VC variables, there were significantly higher amounts in 93% of surgeries for FFS above global hospital documents. Conclusion: The findings can reinforce the presence of a relationship between providing more clinical services in FFS document form and providers' incentives to adjust profits against their Costs. The significantly higher service provision in FFS documents can be controlled with a prospective global payment mechanism.

RESUMEN

In the current healthcare climate, reimbursement for services is increasingly linked to the ability to demonstrate beneficial patient outcomes. Neuropsychology faces some unique challenges in outcomes research, namely, that neuropsychologists often do not follow patients over time and the effect of neuropsychological services on patient outcomes may not be fully realized until under another provider's care. Yet there is an urgent need for empirical evidence linking neuropsychological practice to positive patient outcomes. To provide a framework for this research, we define a core set of patient-centered outcomes and neuropsychological processes that apply across practice settings and patient populations. Within each area, we review the available existing literature on neuropsychological outcomes, identifying substantial gaps in the literature for future research. This work will be critical for the field to demonstrate the benefit of neuropsychological services, to continue to advocate effectively for reimbursement, and to ensure high-quality patient care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of a pay-for-performance program on changes in the number of dental procedures performed by public secondary dental care services in Brazil. METHODS: A longitudinal study was carried out with 932 public Dental Specialities Centres (Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas - CEO) that participated in the pay-for-performance Program for the Improvement of Access and Quality of Dental Specialities Centres Services (PMAQ/CEO) and 379 non-CEO centres with secondary dental production. The non-CEO and a group of CEOs did not receive financial incentives from the PMAQ-CEO and served as control groups. Three CEOs groups received additional financial incentives of 20%, 60% or 100% over maintenance values, based on their performance scores. The outcome was the increase (yes/no) in the number of dental procedures between 2011/2013 and 2015/2017. Analyses were carried out using logistic regressions. RESULTS: The number of specialized procedures increased in 48.4% of the services, 44.6% among non-CEO, 52.3% among CEO with no financial incentive and 59.1% among CEO with 100% incentive. The fully adjusted model showed that CEOs receiving 100% of the financial incentive had greater odds of increasing the production of dental procedures (OR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.09-2.51). Services that increased the number of specialist dentists had (OR = 2.35, 95%CI 1.88-2.94). Municipalities that increased in coverage of private dental insurance had OR = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.94-1.02), and those with higher coverage of primary dental care had OR = 1.02 (95%CI: 0.99-1.05). CONCLUSION: Pay-for-performance may increase the production of dental procedures by CEOs, and mechanisms explaining it must be further investigated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Revisão sistemática acerca da efetividade da remuneração por desempenho na melhoria de indicadores de processo/resultado em programas e serviços de atenção primária à saúde. Realizou-se busca na PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO e Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde, resultando em 22 estudos analisados quanto ao tipo de estudo, objetivo, qualidade da evidência e principais achados. Constatou-se que a remuneração por desempenho apresentou impacto na atenção clínica às doenças, acessibilidade aos serviços, melhoria nos processos de acompanhamento e rentabilidade da utilização e apresenta-se como estratégia potencial à indução de melhorias na qualidade nos serviços de saúde, ainda que consideradas suas limitações.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of pay for performance in the improvement process of indicators/results in primary health care programs and services. A search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and Virtual Health Library, resulting in 22 studies analyzed as to the type of study, objective, evidence quality, and main findings. It was found that the pay for performance impacted clinical care to disease, accessibility to services, improving the monitoring of processes, and profitability of use and presents itself as a potential strategy to induce improvements in the quality of health services, although considering its limitations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: This study investigated whether participation by patients with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan's pay-for-performance (P4P) program and maintaining good continuity of care (COC) with their healthcare provider reduced the likelihood of future complications, such as retinopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis used longitudinal panel data for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes from the National Health Insurance claims database in Taiwan. COC was measured annually from 2003 to 2013, and was used to allocate the patients to low, medium and high groups. Cox regression analysis was used with time-dependent (time-varying) covariates in a reduced model (with only P4P or COC), and the full model was adjusted with other covariates. RESULTS: Despite the same significant effects of treatment at primary care, the Diabetes Complications Severity Index scores were significantly associated with the development of retinopathy. After adjusting for these, the hazard ratios for developing retinopathy among P4P participants in the low, medium and high COC groups were 0.594 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.398-0.898, P = 0.012), 0.676 (95% CI 0.520-0.867, P = 0.0026) and 0.802 (95% CI 0.603-1.030, P = 0.1062), respectively. Thus, patients with low or median COC who participated in the P4P program had a significantly lower risk of retinopathy than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes care requires a long-term relationship between patients and their care providers. Besides encouraging patients to participate in P4P programs, health authorities should provide more incentives for providers or patients to regularly survey patients' lipid profiles and glucose levels, and reward the better interpersonal relationship to prevent retinopathy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released the final payment rules for reimbursement of advance care planning (ACP) effective January 2016. In its first year, 23,000 providers nationwide submitted 624,000 claims using the Current Procedural Terminology codes 99497 and 99498. The objectives of our study were to 1) assess the frequency of ACP codes used at a single academic tertiary care center in Iowa, 2) determine when and by whom the codes were used, and 3) summarize ACP clinical notes. METHODS: Using the electronic medical record data warehouse from a single tertiary teaching hospital and affiliated clinics, date of service, department where service was provided, provider name and type, patient medical record number, date of birth, and gender linked to the ACP codes 99497 and 99498 were collected. The content of ACP clinical notes were reviewed and summarized. Study period was from January 1, 2016 through September 19, 2018. RESULTS: During the 33 months, code 99497 was used 17 times and code 99498 was never used. Code 99497 was successfully reimbursed 4 times. DISCUSSION: Charges were not reimbursed if the ACP visits did not meet the minimum time requirement or were conducted by an individual not considered a qualified health care professional per Medicare rules. CONCLUSION: ACP codes 99497 and 99498 were very rarely used at this tertiary care center during the initial 33-months after the Medicare rules went into effect. Interventions are needed to promote the use of ACP codes, so the time spent in important ACP discussions are properly compensated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract: Although it is well known that a successful implementation depends on the front-liners' knowledge and participation, as well as on the organizational capacity of the institutions involved, we still know little about how front-line health workers have been involved in the implementation of the Brazilian National Program for Improving Access and Quality to Primary Care (PMAQ). This paper develops a contingent mixed-method approach to explore the perceptions of front-line health workers - managers, nurses, community health workers, and doctors - regarding the PMAQ (2nd round), and their evaluations concerning health unit organizational capacity. The research is guided by three relevant inter-related concepts from implementation theory: policy knowledge, participation, and organizational capacity. One hundred and twenty-seven health workers from 12 primary health care units in Goiânia, Goiás State, Brazil, answered semi-structured questionnaires, seeking to collect data on reasons for adherence, forms of participation, perceived impact (open-ended questions), and evaluation of organizational capacity (score between 0-10). Content analyses of qualitative data enabled us to categorize the variables "level of perceived impact of PMAQ" and "reasons for adhering to PMAQ". The calculation and aggregation of the means for the scores given for organizational capacity enabled us to classify distinct levels of organizational capacity. We finally integrated both variables (Perceived-Impact and Organizational-Capacity) through cross-tabulation and the narrative. Results show that nurses are the main type of professional participating. The low organizational capacity and little policy knowledge affected workers participation in and their perceptions of the PMAQ.

Resumo: Sabe-se que a implementação bem-sucedida de um programa depende do conhecimento e da participação dos profissionais que trabalham na ponta, além da capacidade organizacional das instituições envolvidas. No entanto, ainda sabemos pouco sobre o envolvimento desses profissionais na implementação do Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (PMAQ). O artigo desenvolve uma abordagem de métodos mistos de tipo contingente para explorar as percepções dos profissionais de saúde na ponta - gestores locais, enfermeiros, agentes comunitários de saúde e médicos - sobre o segundo ciclo do PMAQ, além de relacionar essas percepções às avaliações a respeito da capacidade organizacional da unidade de saúde. O estudo é orientado por três conceitos inter-relacionados e relevantes da teoria da implementação: conhecimento das políticas, participação e capacidade organizacional. Cento e vinte e sete profissionais de saúde de 12 unidades de atenção primária em Goiânia, Goiás, Brasil, responderam questionários semiestruturados, buscando coletar dados sobre os motivos pela adesão, formas de participação, impacto percebido (perguntas abertas) e avaliação da capacidade organizacional (pontuações de 0 a 10). As análises de conteúdo dos dados qualitativos permitiram categorizar as variáveis "nível percebido de impacto do PMAQ" e "motivos pela adesão ao PMAQ". Os cálculos e agregação da média das pontuações para capacidade organizacional permitiram classificar os diferentes níveis dessa capacidade. Finalmente, foram integradas as duas variáveis (Impacto Percebido e Capacidade Organizacional) através da tabulação cruzada e da narrativa. Os resultados mostram que os enfermeiros são o principal tipo de profissional que participa no programa. A baixa capacidade organizacional e o conhecimento limitado da política afetaram a participação dos professionais de saúde e suas percepções em relação ao PMAQ.

Resumen: Pese a que es bien sabido que una implementación exitosa depende del conocimiento y participación de los trabajadores de salud de primera línea, así como la capacidad organizativa de las instituciones involucradas, todavía sabemos poco sobre cómo los trabajadores de salud en primera línea de atención han sido involucrados en la implementación del Programa Nacional de Mejora del Acceso y Calidad de la Atención Básica (PMAQ) brasileño. Este trabajo desarrolla un enfoque metodológico mixto aleatorio para investigar las percepciones de los trabajadores de primera línea de la salud -gestores, enfermeras, trabajadores comunitarios de cuidados de salud, y doctores- en relación con el PMAQ (segunda fase), y asociarlos con sus evaluaciones respecto a la capacidad organizativa de las unidades de salud. La investigación está guiada por tres conceptos relevantes interrelacionados, provenientes de la teoría de la implementación: política de conocimiento, participación, y capacidad organizativa. Ciento veintisiete trabajadores de salud, procedentes de 12 unidades de atención primaria de salud en Goiânia, respondieron a cuestionarios semiestructurados, buscando recoger datos sobre: adherencia, formas de participación, impacto percibido (preguntas de final abierto), y evaluación de la capacidad organizativa (notas entre 0-10). El contenido de los análisis cualitativos de datos nos permitió categorizar las variables "nivel del impacto percibido de PMAQ" y "razones de adherencia al PMAQ". El cálculo y agregación de medios para los marcadores proporcionados, respecto a la capacidad organizativa, nos permitieron clasificar los distintos niveles de la misma. Integramos, finalmente, ambas variables (Impacto Percibido y Capacidad Organizativa) mediante tabulación cruzada y narrativa. Los resultados muestran que las enfermeras son la mayor parte de las profesionales que participan. La baja capacidad organizativa y el escaso conocimiento sobre las políticas que deben ser implementadas afectó a la participación y sus percepciones sobre el PMAQ.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Improving care for people with long-term conditions is central to NHS policy. It has been suggested that the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), a primary care pay-for-performance scheme that rewards practices for delivering effective interventions in long-term conditions, does not encourage high-quality care for this group of patients. AIM: To examine the evidence that the QOF has improved quality of care for patients with long-term conditions. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a systematic review of research on the effectiveness of the QOF in the UK. METHOD: The authors searched electronic databases for peer-reviewed empirical quantitative research studying the effect of the QOF on a broad range of processes and outcomes of care, including coordination and integration of care, holistic and personalised care, self-care, patient experience, physiological and biochemical outcomes, health service utilisation, and mortality. Because the studies were heterogeneous, a narrative synthesis was carried out. RESULTS: The authors identified three systematic reviews and five primary research studies that met the inclusion criteria. The QOF was associated with a modest slowing of both the increase in emergency admissions and the increase in consultations in severe mental illness (SMI), and modest improvements in diabetes care. The nature of the evidence means that the authors cannot be sure that any of these associations is causal. No clear effect on mortality was found. The authors found no evidence that the QOF influences integration or coordination of care, holistic care, self-care, or patient experience. CONCLUSION: The NHS should consider more broadly what constitutes high-quality primary care for people with long-term conditions, and consider other ways of motivating primary care to deliver it.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) shows promise for improving care and reducing costs. We sought to reduce the uncertainty regarding the time and cost of PCMH transformation by quantifying the direct costs of transforming 57 practices in a medical group to National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)-recognized Level III PCMHs. METHODS: We conducted structured interviews with corporate leaders, and with physicians, practice administrators, and office managers from a representative sample of practices regarding time spent on PCMH transformation and NCQA application, and related purchases. We then developed and sent a survey to all primary care practices (practice-level response rate: initial recognition-44.6%, renewal-35.7%). Direct costs were estimated as time spent multiplied by average hourly wage for the relevant job category, plus observed expenditures. RESULTS: We estimated HealthTexas' corporate costs for initial NCQA recognition (2010-2012) at $1,508,503; for renewal (2014-2016), $346,617; the Care Coordination resource costs an additional ongoing $390,790/year. A hypothetical 5-physician HealthTexas practice spent another estimated 239.5 hours ($10,669) obtaining, and 110.5 hours ($4,957) renewing, recognition. CONCLUSION: Centralized PCMH support reduces the burden on practices; however, overall time and cost remains substantial, and should be weighed against the mixed evidence regarding PCMH's impact on quality and costs of care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomised study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital to evaluate the effects of financial incentives for smoking cessation targeted at a high-risk population. METHODS: Patients with a past history of head and neck cancer were voluntarily enrolled over a two-year period. They were randomised to a cash incentives or no incentive group. Subjects were offered enrolment in smoking cessation courses. Smoking by-product levels were assessed at 30 days, 3 months and 6 months. Subjects in the incentive group received $150 if smoking cessation was confirmed. RESULTS: Over 2 years, 114 patients with an established diagnosis of head and neck cancer were offered enrolment. Twenty-four enrolled and 14 attended the smoking cessation classes. Only two successfully quit smoking at six months. Both these patients were in the financially incentivised group and received $150 at each test visit. CONCLUSION: Providing a financial incentive for smoking cessation to a population already carrying a diagnosis of head and neck cancer in order to promote a positive behaviour change was unsuccessful.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: This study was designed to determine (1) the impact of policy on longitudinal changes in nurse staffing levels and (2) the characteristics of policy-responsive Korean hospitals. BACKGROUND: A policy of varying nursing fees according to staffing grade by measuring the nurse-to-bed ratio has been implemented in Korean hospitals since 1999 with the aim of satisfying patient care needs and providing safe and high-quality nursing care. METHODS: Nurse staffing hospital characteristics data were collected from Korean Hospital Nurses Association yearbooks for the period 1996-2011. The obtained time series nurse staffing data were analysed by assessing the nurse-to-bed ratio. Graphs were used to view nurse staffing trends in various nursing units by hospital type during the study period. Mixed repeated-measures modelling was used to analyse nurse staffing and hospital characteristics, with year categorized as a dummy variable. There were 585 and 1239 observations related to measurements of nurse staffing grade in 44 tertiary and 193 general hospitals, respectively. For measuring the nurse staffing grade in intensive care units, the number of observations for general hospitals was decreased to 1170. RESULTS: Long-term nurse staffing in general and intensive care units was improved post-policy compared with pre-policy in both tertiary and general hospitals. Nurse staffing was improved more in Seoul than in other areas and was significantly better for hospitals with more beds for both hospital types. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: Although the financial incentive policy implemented in Korea has had an overall positive result on nurse staffing, the effect was not assure in small-sized hospitals in rural area. A more refined method for calculating nurse staffing and increasing financial incentives relative to staffing grade is needed to improve hospital nurse staffing.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Korea has achieved a remarkable expansion in health coverage at modest costs relative to other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Hospitals are more accessible and equipped with more advanced medical technologies than in most other OECD countries. OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality seek to support the development of better policies to improve the quality of healthcare. In 2012, a report on Korea presented best practices and offered recommendations for improvement in the Korean health system. Korea's health care system needs to shift its focus from simply supporting an ever-continuing expansion of acute care services to quality of healthcare. First, Korea needs to strengthen the focus of governance to the quality of healthcare by establishing HIRA as an institutional champion for quality. Second, Korea must strengthen primary healthcare because in Korea it is woefully underdeveloped today. Third, Korea must use financing to drive improvements in quality of care. In reality, HIRA has used its power over healthcare providers to force them to accept financial constraints; it has not supported quality of all healthcare sectors. Without structural changes allowing for independent judgment on the quality at HIRA, NECA is more suitable for ensuring quality for all healthcare sectors. As suggested by the OECD report, Korea must strengthen primary healthcare by restoring patients' trust in health professionals. In using financing to drive improvements in quality of healthcare, Pay for Performance may be helpful, but that must be driven on a voluntary basis and with a great financial incentive.

Asunto(s)