Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 12(5): e1242, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39210688

RESUMEN

Cyclosporin A (CsA), an immunosuppressive drug used in transplant recipients, inhibits graft rejection by binding to cyclophilins and competitively inhibiting calcineurin. While concerns about respiratory infections in immunosuppressed patients exist, contradictory data emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic, prompting investigations into CsA's impact on viral infections. This study explores CsA's antiviral effects on SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1, Delta variants, and human parainfluenza virus 3 (HPIV3) using an ex vivo model of human airway epithelium (HAE). CsA exhibited a dose-dependent antiviral effect against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant, reducing viral load over 10 days. However, no significant impact was observed against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron or HPIV3, indicating a virus-specific effect. At high concentrations, CsA was associated with an increase of IL-8 and a decrease of IFNλ expression in infected and noninfected HAE. This study highlights the complexity of CsA's antiviral mechanisms, more likely involving intricate inflammatory pathways and interactions with specific viral proteins. The research provides novel insights into CsA's effects on respiratory viruses, emphasizing the need for understanding drug-virus interactions in optimizing therapeutic approaches for transplant recipients and advancing knowledge on immunosuppressive treatments' implications on respiratory viral infections. Limitations include the model's inability to assess T lymphocyte activation, suggesting the necessity for further comprehensive studies to decipher the intricate dynamics of immunosuppressive treatments on respiratory viral infections.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Ciclosporina , Inmunosupresores , SARS-CoV-2 , Replicación Viral , Humanos , Ciclosporina/farmacología , Replicación Viral/efectos de los fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Antivirales/farmacología , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Virus de la Parainfluenza 3 Humana/efectos de los fármacos , Virus de la Parainfluenza 3 Humana/fisiología , Mucosa Respiratoria/virología , Mucosa Respiratoria/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Respiratoria/metabolismo , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Interferones/farmacología , Interferones/metabolismo , Interleucina-8/metabolismo , COVID-19/virología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga
2.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1361685, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38665914

RESUMEN

A 54-year-old Japanese man presented with headache and fever the day after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. He became deeply unconscious within a week. Brain MRI showed periventricular linear enhancements and a few spotty lesions in the cerebral white matter. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing showed mild pleocytosis. He was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone and plasma exchange. However, the white matter lesions enlarged to involve the brainstem and cerebellum, and long cord spinal lesions appeared. Anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody was positive in the CSF and serum, and he was therefore diagnosed as autoimmune GFAP-astrocytopathy (GFAP-A). In addition, high-dose immunoglobulin therapy was administered twice, but his symptoms did not improve; the white matter lesions enlarged further, and modified Rankin Scale score increased to 5. A brain biopsy specimen showed infiltration of macrophages and CD4 + lymphocytes together with neuron and oligodendrocytic injuries and glial scar. Although GFAP-A generally responds well to steroids, the present case developed GFAP-A following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with refractory to intensive immunosuppressive therapy and atypical pathologic findings of infiltration of CD4 + lymphocytes and demyelination.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Astrocitos/inmunología , Astrocitos/patología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Encéfalo/patología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 11(11): e1063, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018599

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the mutual impact of COVID-19 and psoriasis to inform clinical practice and future research. METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis protocol for systematic reviews and searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar until May 1, 2022. Eligibility criteria included full-text articles in English reporting COVID-19 treatment outcomes in psoriasis patients. Studies on animals, letters to editors, non-English studies, and studies with no access to full articles were excluded. Search results were screened and data were extracted by two groups of reviewers with any discrepancies resolved by the senior author. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for nonrandomized studies. The hospitalization rate, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rate, case fatality rate, odds ratios of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization rate in psoriasis patients were extracted and analyzed using random effects analysis to calculate pooled prevalence and odds ratios, as well as to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: We found 1980 records from four databases and included 20 studies after screening and removing duplicates. These studies evaluated 185,000 psoriasis patients and included eight retrospective cohort studies, one case-control study, three cross-sectional studies, and eight case series studies. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psoriasis treatment and the outcome of COVID-19 infection in psoriasis patients receiving different forms of treatment were evaluated. The pooled data from included studies showed that the incidence rate of COVID-19 infection among psoriasis patients was 0.03% (confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.06), with a pooled odds ratio of 1.97 (CI: 0.69-5.60) compared to the general population. The hospitalization rate, ICU admission rate, and case fatality rate for psoriasis patients with COVID-19 were 0.17 (CI: 0.10-0.31), 0.06 (CI: 0.06-0.46), and 0.02 (CI: 0.01-0.04), respectively. Additionally, psoriasis patients receiving systemic nonbiologic therapy had a pooled odds ratio of 2.32 (CI: 1.18-4.57) for hospitalization compared to those using biologic agents. CONCLUSION: Studies have shown that biologic therapy for psoriasis did not increase the risk of hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection and may have even offered some protection. Treatment adherence was higher in psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapies than those receiving conventional therapies. These findings suggest that psoriasis treatment did not negatively impact COVID-19 infection and that treatment could be continued on a case-by-case basis during the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , COVID-19 , Psoriasis , Humanos , Factores Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , COVID-19/epidemiología , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(12): ofac632, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36519114

RESUMEN

Background: Large clinical trials on drugs for hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have shown significant effects on mortality. There may be a discrepancy with the observed real-world effect. We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the Netherlands during 4 pandemic waves and analyze the association of the newly introduced treatments with mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and discharge alive. Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective analysis of hospitalized COVID-19 patients between February 27, 2020, and December 31, 2021. Patients were categorized into waves and into treatment groups (hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, neutralizing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 monoclonal antibodies, corticosteroids, and interleukin [IL]-6 antagonists). Four types of Cox regression analyses were used: unadjusted, adjusted, propensity matched, and propensity weighted. Results: Among 5643 patients from 11 hospitals, we observed a changing epidemiology during 4 pandemic waves, with a decrease in median age (67-64 years; P < .001), in in-hospital mortality on the ward (21%-15%; P < .001), and a trend in the ICU (24%-16%; P = .148). In ward patients, hydroxychloroquine was associated with increased mortality (1.54; 95% CI, 1.22-1.96), and remdesivir was associated with a higher rate of discharge alive within 29 days (1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31). Corticosteroids were associated with a decrease in mortality (0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.96); the results of IL-6 antagonists were inconclusive. In patients directly admitted to the ICU, hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, and IL-6 antagonists were not associated with decreased mortality. Conclusions: Both remdesivir and corticosteroids were associated with better outcomes in ward patients with COVID-19. Continuous evaluation of real-world treatment effects is needed.

6.
Ophthalmol Ther ; 11(6): 2297-2307, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36224311

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This article aimed to summarize the outcomes of escalating immunosuppressive treatments for patients with recalcitrant noninfectious posterior scleritis (PS). METHODS: Clinical records of 16 patients diagnosed with recalcitrant noninfectious PS in the Ocular Immunity and Uveitis Department of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center from September 2016 to December 2021 were reviewed. Patients were treated with escalating immunosuppressive regimen including corticosteroid, immunosuppressants (IMTs), and adalimumab (ADA). Demographic characteristics and clinical findings at each visit were recorded. The doses of prednisone were analyzed. Main outcomes were corticosteroid-sparing effects, control of inflammation, visual acuity, and safety profile. RESULTS: Ocular pain was the most common finding (100%), followed by the T sign on the B scan (93.8%) and associated anterior scleritis (75.0%). The average initial dose of prednisone was 25.0 mg/day, and tapered to 11.3 and 5.0 mg/day at month 1 and 3, respectively, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). The median overall periods of prednisone tapering to 10, 5, and 0 mg/day were 1.0, 3.0, and 3.0 months, respectively. There were 93.8% of patients receiving prednisone ≤ 10 mg/day and 68.8% of patients off prednisone at last visit. There were 80% of patients treated with IMT and ADA off prednisone at last visit, reaching the highest percentage compared with others. A best-corrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better at last visit was achieved in 10 eyes (62.5%). The escalating treatments showed good safety profile. CONCLUSION: Patients of recalcitrant noninfectious PS benefited from escalating immunosuppressive treatments with favorable visual outcome, in which methotrexate, ciclosporin, and ADA were preferred with good safety.

7.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 19: 100441, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35789881

RESUMEN

Background: Prior to the availability of vaccines, the risk factors for developing severe forms of COVID-19 were mostly older age and various comorbidities such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders, transplantations, and kidney disease. Although vaccines have been shown to be highly effective in preventing severe forms of COVID-19, a residual risk may persist, despite vaccination, for certain population groups. Methods: The study was based on data from the national COVID-19 vaccination database (VAC-SI) coupled with the National Health Data System (SNDS), which contains comprehensive reimbursement and hospitalisation data for all of France. All people fully vaccinated by July 31, 2021, with a double-injection vaccine, i.e., the mRNA BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines, or a single dose for people with a previous confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included and followed until August 31, 2021. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for COVID-19-related hospitalisation or in-hospital death associated with age, gender, deprivation index, comorbidities, and immunosuppressive or oral corticosteroid therapy from day 14 after full-vaccination. Findings: In a population of 28,031,641 fully vaccinated individuals with an average follow-up of 80 days, 5,345 (87 hospitalisations per 100,000 person-years) were hospitalised for COVID-19 and 996 (16 in-hospital death per 100,000 person-years) died in hospital. In multivariable analysis, a higher risk was observed with increasing age, male gender, and social deprivation. Most of the 47 chronic conditions considered were positively associated with an increased risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisation and a slight excess risk of death. The risk of hospitalisation and in-hospital death for COVID-19 also increased with the use of immunosuppressants (aHR 3.3 [2.8-3.8] and 2.4 [1.7-3.5], respectively) and oral corticosteroids (aHR 2.8 [2.5-3.1] and 4.1 [3.3-5.1]).Less than 10% (519/5,345) of hospitalised cases and 2% (24/996) of those who died in hospital had no identified comorbidities. There was a strong association between an increasing number of comorbidities and the risk of hospitalisation and in-hospital death (e.g., 5+ versus none, aHR 10.1 95%CI 9.0-11.5 and 17.8 95%CI 11.5-27.4, respectively). Interpretation: Although vaccination has dramatically reduced the occurrence of severe forms of COVID-19, a residual risk remains for the elderly, immunocompromised, and polypathological populations and warrants complementary preventive measures. Funding: None.

8.
Muscle Nerve ; 64(2): 206-211, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34031902

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, has become a global pandemic. Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), often treated with immunosuppressants, might be at higher risk of developing COVID-19 and of demonstrating a severe disease course. We aimed to study prevalence and describe features of COVID-19 in MG patients. METHODS: In May 2020, we conducted telephonic interviews with MG patients followed at our referral center. We collected structured data regarding MG and COVID-19, which was diagnosed as probable or confirmed according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control case definition. We compared confirmed-COVID-19 prevalence calculated from the beginning of the pandemic in MG patients with that of the overall Pavia district. RESULTS: We interviewed 162 MG patients (median age, 66 y; interquartile range 41-77; males 59.9%), 88 from the Pavia district. Three patients had SARS-CoV-2-confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and eight had probable-COVID-19. In the Pavia district, the prevalence of confirmed-COVID-19 among MG patients (1/88, 1.14%) and overall population (4777/546 515, 0.87%) did not differ (P = .538). Higher Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinicalclass and the need for recent rescue treatment, but not ongoing immunosuppressive treatments, were associated with COVID-19 risk. Of 11 MG patients with probable/confirmed-COVID-19, 3 required ventilator support, and 2 elderly patients died of COVID-19 respiratory insufficiency. Only 1 of11 patients experienced worsening MG symptoms, which improved after increasing their steroid dose. DISCUSSION: The risk of COVID-19 in MG patients seems to be no higher than that of the general population, regardless of immunosuppressive therapies. In our cohort, COVID-19 barely affected MG course.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Miastenia Gravis/diagnóstico , Miastenia Gravis/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miastenia Gravis/tratamiento farmacológico
9.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 17(6): 561-571, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33787418

RESUMEN

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic raises a great challenge in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which are generally more susceptible to infection events because of the autoimmune condition itself and the treatment with immunomodulatory drugs. The use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including biologics and targeted-synthetic DMARDs, has aroused particular interest because of both their immunosuppressive effects and their hypothetical potential in COVID-19 treatment.Areas covered: For this narrative review, a literature search was conducted between December 2019 and February 2021 on PubMed including epidemiological studies, gathering the main evidence available to date about the impact of COVID-19 on RA patients and the influence of anti-rheumatic drugs on patients' susceptibility to this infection. We also summarize the recommendations from the international guidelines on the management of rheumatic diseases and treatments in this pandemic context, especially focused on RA.Expert opinion: About a year after the outbreak of the pandemic, we are able to answer some of the most relevant questions regarding patients with RA and their management in this pandemic context. Our efforts must now be directed toward consolidating the currently available data with more rigorous studies and facing new issues and challenges including, foremost, vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19/terapia , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Rev. argent. reumatolg. (En línea) ; 32(1): 7-15, mar. 2021. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1279753

RESUMEN

Con el fin de evaluar el impacto de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas, la Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología desarrolló el Registro Nacional de Pacientes con Enfermedades Reumáticas y COVID-19 (SAR-COVID). El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de los pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas e infección por SARS-CoV-2 incluidos en el registro SAR-COVID y describir las complicaciones y desenlaces de la COVID-19 en esta población. Material y métodos: SAR-COVID es un registro nacional, multicéntrico y observacional, en el cual se incluyen de manera consecutiva pacientes ≥18 años de edad, con diagnóstico de alguna enfermedad reumática que hayan cursado infección por SARS-CoV-2. Se consignan datos sociodemográficos, comorbilidades, enfermedad reumática y su tratamiento, características clínicas, laboratorio, complicaciones y tratamientos de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: Se incluyeron 525 pacientes, con una edad media de 51.3 años (DE 15.2). Las enfermedades reumatológicas más frecuentes fueron artritis reumatoidea (40.4%), lupus eritematoso sistémico (14.9%) y espondiloartritis (8.2%). El 72.9% recibía tratamiento inmunosupresor o inmunomodulador al momento del inicio de la infección y 36.9% glucocorticoides. En la mayoría de los casos, el diagnóstico de infección por SARS-CoV-2 se llevó a cabo mediante RT-PCR (95%), 39.4% en la consulta externa, 32.2% en el departamento de urgencias, y 14.7% durante la hospitalización. La mayoría de los pacientes presentaron síntomas, siendo los más frecuentes fiebre (56.2%), tos (46.7%) y cefalea (39.2%). Durante la infección, 35.1% requirieron hospitalización y 11.6% en unidad de cuidados intensivos. El 75.1% se recuperó completamente, 8.4% presentó secuelas y 6.9% murieron a causa de COVID-19. Conclusión: En este primer reporte del registro SAR-COVID encontramos una amplia distribución de enfermedades reumáticas. La mayoría de los pacientes tuvieron una buena evolución de la infección, sin embargo un 7% falleció como consecuencia de la misma, datos comparables a los reportados por otros registros latinoamericanos con poblaciones similares.


In order to assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases, the Argentine Society of Rheumatology has developed the National Registry of Patients with Rheumatic Diseases and COVID-19 (SAR-COVID). The aim of this study was to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatic diseases and SARS-CoV-2 infection included in the SAR-COVID registry and to describe the complications and outcomes of COVID-19 in this population. Methods: SAR-COVID is a national, multicenter and observational registry, in which patients ≥18 years of age, with a diagnosis of a rheumatic disease who had SARS-CoV-2 infection are consecutively included. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, underlying rheumatic disease and treatment, clinical characteristics, complications, laboratory and treatment of the SARS-CoV-2 infection were recorded. Results: A total of 525 patients were included, with a mean age of 51.3 years (SD 15.2). The most frequent rheumatic diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (40.4%), systemic lupus erythematous (14.9%) and spondyloarthritis (8.2%). At the time of the infection, 72.9% were receiving immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment and 36.9% glucocorticoids. Most of the patients were diagnosed using RT-PCR (95%), at outpatient consultation (39.4%), at the emergency room (32.2%) or during hospitalization (14.7%). Symptoms were present in 96% of the patients, the most frequent being fever (56.2%), cough (46.7%) and headache (39.2%). During infection, 35.1% were hospitalized, 11.6% were admitted to the ICU and 6.9% died due to COVID-19. Most of them (75.1%) recovered completely. Conclusions: In this first report of the SAR-COVID registry we found a wide distribution of rheumatic diseases. Most of the patients had a good evolution of the infection, however 7% died as a result of it, comparable to other Latin American registries with similar populations.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide , Reumatología , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Betacoronavirus
11.
Nephrol Ther ; 17(2): 74-79, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33451938

RESUMEN

Thanks to medical progress in the field of kidney transplantation, the quality of life of women suffering from kidney failure has greatly improved in recent years. As a result, their fertility has increased significantly and pregnancies are now more frequent and safer. Kidney transplantation requires constant immunosuppressive treatment during pregnancy. These products can cross the placental barrier and their prescription is therefore subject to rigorous medical monitoring. There are many environmental factors that can affect the development of the child during pregnancy and affect its subsequent cognitive development. The possible impact of these immunosuppressive treatments on the medium- and long-term intellectual development of the children concerned is as yet little documented. Even if the available data are reassuring, the methodologies used in this work nevertheless raise questions and legitimize the development of complementary research. The aim of this review is to propose a synthesis of existing data in this field and to open up avenues for future research.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Niño , Cognición , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Placenta , Embarazo , Calidad de Vida
12.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 51(1): 49-71, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33360230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The neurological and psychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) are a heterogeneous group of conditions with variable clinical presentation and significant morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to comprehensively assess and present the evidence for treatments used in the management of inflammatory NPSLE. METHODS: Medline, Embase, CINHAL and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from 1990 to end of March 2019 using key words that related to NPSLE and treatment. Included studies comprised clinical trials, observational studies or case series with ≥5 patients and sufficient data related to treatment and outcome in NPSLE patients. RESULTS: There were 7222 studies identified in the search, of which 90 were included in the review. There was a notable paucity of clinical trials, with only two randomised controlled trials and one pilot study. Treatment categories included corticosteroids (14 studies), cyclophosphamide (18 studies), synthetic DMARDs (7 studies), biologic therapies (14 studies), therapeutic plasma exchange (6 studies), intravenous immunoglobulin (2 studies), autologous stem cell transplant (3 studies), other therapies (8 studies), combination therapies (6 studies), studies with grouped outcome data (5 studies) and observational studies with therapy-specific associations (7 studies). Corticosteroids are accepted as first line treatment in NPSLE and there is low-moderate evidence supporting their benefit. Moderate evidence, based on consistent data in numerous studies and some trial data, supports the use of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of NPSLE. Limited data support some synthetic DMARDs such as mycophenolate, azathioprine and intrathecal methotrexate. In refractory disease, low-moderate evidence supports rituximab therapy and limited evidence supports benefit following autologous stem cell transplant. Regarding adjuvant treatments, limited evidence favours addition of plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and hydroxychloroquine. There exists very limited data for other therapies. CONCLUSION: There are multiple therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory NPSLE including systemic, biologic and interventional therapies; however, currently there is a paucity of high-quality trial data to guide firm recommendations. In order to better understand the optimal treatment of NPSLE and its different subtypes, further well-designed clinical trials are needed.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Vasculitis por Lupus del Sistema Nervioso Central , Azatioprina , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/terapia , Vasculitis por Lupus del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Proyectos Piloto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
13.
Cancer Manag Res ; 12: 9139-9158, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33061607

RESUMEN

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have radically changed the clinical outcome of several cancers with durable responses. CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4), PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) or PDL-1 (programmed cell death ligand protein 1) represent ICIs that can be used as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. The toxicity p\rofiles of ICIs differ from the side effects of cytotoxic agents and come with new toxicities like immune-related adverse events. Typically, these toxicities occur in all organs. However, the main organs affected are the skin, digestive, hepatic, lungs, rheumatologic, and endocrine. Most of the immune toxicity that occurs is low grade but some more severe toxicities can occur that require a rapid diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The recognition of symptoms by physicians and patient is necessary to resolve them rapidly and adapt treatment to allow the toxicity to resolve.

14.
Eur J Neurol ; 27(8): 1546-1555, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32320109

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data on the pregnancy outcome of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remain limited, especially for woman who had received immunosuppressive treatment before becoming pregnant. The aim was to evaluate the outcome of pregnancy amongst patients with NMOSD who attempted to become pregnant after NMOSD onset and to identify risk factors that predict pregnancy-related attack. METHODS: Medical records from 29 patients who attempted to become pregnant after NMOSD onset were retrospectively evaluated and the patients were interviewed for pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancy-related attack was defined as an attack that occurred during pregnancy or within 1 year of delivery. RESULTS: Amongst the 29 patients, 26 had 33 pregnancies after NMOSD symptom onset. The 33 pregnancies after NMOSD onset resulted in 24 live births (healthy neonates except one with low birth weight), six miscarriages and three elective abortions. Pregnancy-related attack occurred in nine (75%) of 12 pregnancies before initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, but in only five (24%) of 21 pregnancies after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (P = 0.009). Multivariable analysis indicated that pregnancy-related attack was negatively associated with pregnancy after initiation of rituximab (odds ratio 0.048, 95% confidence interval 0.004-0.546). CONCLUSION: Successful pregnancy without maternal and neonatal complications may be feasible in patients with NMOSD. Rituximab treatment before pregnancy might help to prevent pregnancy-related attack in patients with NMOSD.


Asunto(s)
Neuromielitis Óptica , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Recién Nacido , Neuromielitis Óptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuromielitis Óptica/epidemiología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico
15.
Br J Haematol ; 189(5): 931-942, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32130726

RESUMEN

Childhood chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (cITP) is a rare disease. In severe cases, there is no evidence for the optimal therapeutic strategy. Our aim was to describe the real-life management of non-selected children with cITP at diagnosis. Since 2004, patients less than 18 years old with cITP have been enrolled in the national prospective cohort, OBS'CEREVANCE. From 1990 to 2014, in 29 centres, 392 children were diagnosed with cITP. With a median follow-up of six years (2·0-25), 45% did not need second-line therapy, and 55% (n = 217) received one or more second lines, mainly splenectomy (n = 108), hydroxychloroquine (n = 61), rituximab (n = 61) or azathioprine (n = 40). The overall five-year further second-line treatment-free survival was 56% [95% CI 49·5-64.1]. The use of splenectomy significantly decreased over time. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to children with positive antinuclear antibodies, more frequently older and girls, and reached 55% efficacy. None of the patients died. Ten years after the initial diagnosis, 55% of the 56 followed children had achieved complete remission. Children with cITP do not need second-line treatments in 45% of cases. Basing the treatment decision on the pathophysiological pathways is challenging, as illustrated by ITP patients with positive antinuclear antibodies treated with hydroxychloroquine.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Recuperativa , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/epidemiología , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/cirugía , Inducción de Remisión , Distribución por Sexo , Esplenectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Nanomedicine (Lond) ; 14(17): 2379-2390, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31414616

RESUMEN

The current treatments for chronic inflammatory diseases cause severe side effects due to nonspecific drug accumulation. Nanotechnology opens the way to new therapeutic strategies that exploit the ability of immune cells, and especially of phagocytes, to internalize nanoparticles. The cellular uptake of nanoparticles requires specific interactions and is affected by the chemical and physical properties of the carriers. Therefore, optimizing these properties is crucial for designing nanodrugs for immunotherapy. In perspective, we discuss the nanoparticle-based approaches that have been proposed to induce tolerance in autoimmune disorders and lessen the symptoms of inflammatory diseases.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/terapia , Inflamación/terapia , Nanopartículas/uso terapéutico , Animales , Humanos , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Nanomedicina/métodos , Nanotecnología/métodos , Fagocitosis
17.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 25(2): 132-135, abr.-jun. 2018.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-990938

RESUMEN

RESUMEN La infección por Salmonella enteritidis (ISE) es rara en pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES), y comúnmente se confunde con exacerbaciones del LES. ISE en pacientes con LES se ha relacionado con malos desenlaces. Este artículo describe los hallazgos clínicos y desenlaces de 5 pacientes con LES y diagnóstico de ISE, en una cohorte de 325 pacientes (1,53%). Todos los pacientes fueron mujeres, con una edad promedio de 28,2 (14 a 37 años). La duración promedio del LES antes de la ISE clínica fue de 3,2 años (1 a 7 años). No hubo evidencia de infección recurrente. Los pacientes fueron tratados con ciprofloxacino o ceftriaxona, con resolución de las manifestaciones clínicas en 4 pacientes. Un paciente murió debido a falla orgánica multisistémica. Nuestro reporte remarca las manifestaciones clínicas inespecíficas de la ISE que asemeja actividad lúpica. Un adecuado diagnóstico y una terapia antibiótica temprana son esenciales para mejorar los desenlaces de estos pacientes.


ABSTRACT Salmonella enteritidis infection (SEI) is rare in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, and it is often mistaken with SLE flares. SEI in SLE patients has been associated with a poor outcome. A description is presented of the clinical features and outcomes of five patients with an SEI from a cohort of 325 patients with SLE (1.53%). All patients were women, with a mean age of 28.2 years (14 to 37 years). Mean duration of SLE before clinical SEI was 3.2 years (1 to 7 years). There was no evidence of recurrent infection. The patients were treated with ciprofloxacin and/or ceftriaxone, with resolution of clinical manifestations in four of them. One patient died due to multisystem organ failure. Our report highlights the unspecific clinical manifestations of SEI that resembles lupus flare-up. An accurate diagnosis and early antibiotic treatment are essential to improve their outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Salmonella enteritidis , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Vasculitis , Inmunosupresores , Infecciones
18.
Mult Scler ; 23(14): 1902-1908, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28080220

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are the most commonly used first-line therapies for patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). However, some patients experience a relapse following AZA or MMF treatment. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that predict a response to AZA or MMF in NMOSD. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated medical records from 116 patients who were initially treated with AZA or MMF for at least 6 months. Poor response was defined as ⩾2 relapses or ⩾1 severe relapse. RESULTS: Among the 116 patients, 40 (34%) were classified as poor responders. Logistic regression analyses revealed that a poor response was independently associated with a pre-treatment history of a severe attack ( p < 0.001) and a younger age at disease onset ( p = 0.022). Among the 40 patients with a poor response, 29 (73%) switched to rituximab, and only 3 (10%) had a poor response to rituximab. CONCLUSION: Patients with a pre-treatment history of a severe attack and a younger age of onset exhibited an increased risk of a poor response to AZA or MMF therapy. Identifying patients who are unlikely to respond to AZA or MMF therapy may allow for treatment with more potent therapies that improve treatment outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Azatioprina/farmacología , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Ácido Micofenólico/farmacología , Neuromielitis Óptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Rituximab/farmacología , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
19.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord ; 8(3): 109-22, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25941538

RESUMEN

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare and disabling disease. Several experimental studies and clinical data are strongly suggestive of an immune-mediated pathogenesis, although underlying mechanisms in MMN seem to be very specific, mainly because of the presence of IgM anti-GM1 serum antibodies and the dramatic response to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). The origin of antiganglioside antibodies and the way in which they act at the molecular level remain unclear. Several studies have demonstrated the key role of complement activation in the underlying mechanisms of MMN, as well as in animal models of acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). Deposition of the membrane attack complex may disrupt the architecture of the nodes of Ranvier and paranodal areas, causing local disruption of nodal sodium-channel clusters. In patients with MMN, muscle weakness is the consequence of conduction blocks (CB), which leads to secondary axonal degeneration, consequently the aim of the treatment is to reverse CB at early stages of the disease. High-dose immunoglobulin is to date the only therapy which has proven efficacy in MMN patients in providing transient improvement of muscle strength, but long-term follow-up studies show a progressive motor decline. Therefore, other therapies are needed to improve the conduction nerve properties in long-term design. The reduction of complement activation and more generally the gain in paranodal stabilization could be directions for future therapeutic strategies.

20.
Mod Rheumatol ; 25(4): 609-14, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25496409

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial pneumonia (CTD-IP) significantly affects the mortality of patients with CTD. The purpose of the present study is to identify causes and risk factors for death during hospitalization for immunosuppressive treatment of CTD-IP. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted that collected data from patients with CTD who had been hospitalized for commencing or intensifying immunosuppressive treatment of CTD-IP using a standardized case report form. Risk factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: A total of 322 CTD-IP patients were enrolled with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 84), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 13), polymyositis (n = 33), dermatomyositis (n = 69), systemic sclerosis (n = 55), mixed connective tissue disease (n = 21), microscopic polyangiitis (n = 19), and overlap syndrome (n = 28). Of the 42 patients who died during hospitalization, 22 died from CTD-IP, 15 from CTD-IP and pulmonary infection, 2 from pulmonary infection, and 3 from other causes. Age ≥ 65 years and development of pulmonary infections after commencing or intensifying immunosuppressive treatments were identified as risk factors for death during hospitalization after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSION: Careful consideration of the benefit-risk balance of immunosuppressive treatment for CTD-IP is indispensable for improving the short-term vital prognosis of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/inducido químicamente , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Japón/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA