RESUMEN

Infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus pose a significant global public problem. Therefore, new antibiotics and therapeutic strategies are needed to combat this pathogen. This investigation delves into the effects of iclaprim, a newly discovered inhibitor of folic acid synthesis, on S. aureus virulence. The phenotypic and genotypic effects of iclaprim were thoroughly examined in relation to virulence factors, biofilm formation, and dispersal, as well as partial virulence-encoding genes associated with exoproteins, adherence, and regulation in S. aureus MW2, N315, and ATCC 25923. Then, the in vivo effectiveness of iclaprim on S. aureus pathogenicity was explored by a Galleria mellonella larvae infection model. The use of iclaprim at sub-inhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs) resulted in a reduction of α-hemolysin (Hla) production and a differential effect on the activity of coagulase in S. aureus strains. The results of biofilm formation and eradication assay showed that iclaprim was highly effective in depolymerizing the mature biofilm of S. aureus strains at concentrations of 1 MIC or greater, however, inhibited the biofilm-forming ability of only strains N315 and ATCC 25923 at sub-MICs. Interestingly, treatment of strains with sub-MICs of iclaprim resulted in significant stimulation or suppression of most virulence-encoding genes expression. Iclaprim did not affect the production of δ-hemolysin or staphylococcal protein A (SpA), nor did it impact the total activity of proteases, nucleases, and lipases. In vivo testing showed that sub-MICs of iclaprim significantly improves infected larvae survival. The present study offered valuable insights towards a better understating of the influence of iclaprim on different strains of S. aureus. The findings suggest that iclaprim may have potential as an anti-virulence and antibiofilm agent, thus potentially mitigating the pathogenicity of S. aureus and improving clinical outcomes associated with infections caused by this pathogen. KEY POINTS: • Iclaprim effectively inhibits α-hemolysin production and biofilm formation in a strain-dependent manner and was an excellent depolymerizing agent of mature biofilm • Iclaprim affected the mRNA expression of virulence-encoding genes associated with exoproteins, adherence, and regulation • In vivo study in G. mellonella larvae challenged with S. aureus exhibited that iclaprim improves larvae survival.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are among the most common infections worldwide. They manifest in a variety of forms, such as erysipelas, cellulitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Antibiotics are the significant method for clinical treatment of SSTIs. This study reported a methodology framework to determine the efficacy and safety of iclaprim in treatment of SSTIs. Methods: We will search the PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to June 2022 for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on iclaprim with SSTIs. Two authors will independently screen the eligible studies, assess the quality of the included papers, and extract the required information. Randomized controlled trials will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale will be used to evaluate observational studies. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system. RevMan 5.3 will be used for the data synthesis and quantitative analysis. Results and Discussions: This study will provide the clinicians with more high-quality evidence to choose iclaprim for patients with SSTIs. Ethics and Dissemination: This systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data, so ethical approval is not necessary. The results of this meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the in vitro activity of iclaprim and comparators against 40 Listeria monocytogenes clinical isolates mostly (95%) from patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) from the USA, Australia/New Zealand, Latin America and Europe collected between 2012-2018. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretations were based on CLSI criteria. RESULTS: The iclaprim MIC90 value for all L. monocytogenes was 0.015 µg/mL. The MIC50/90 values for iclaprim were 4-fold lower than trimethoprim, the only FDA-approved dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, against all L. monocytogenes. CONCLUSION: Iclaprim demonstrated lower MIC values than trimethoprim against a collection (2012-2018) of L. monocytogenes clinical isolates mostly from patients with BSI from the USA, Australia/New Zealand, Latin America and Europe.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The objective of this pilot study was to examine the activity of iclaprim, a diaminopyrimidine dihydrofolate reducatase inhibitor, in an in vitro infection model of infection with Toxoplasma gondii. Toxoplasma growth was assessed by enzyme linked immunoassay (ELISA) performed directly on the fixed cultures using a peroxidase labeled monoclonal antibody directed against the SAG-l surface protein of T. gondii. For each well, the results were expressed as optical density (OD) values. Iclaprim inhibited T. gondii growth at concentrations between 0.1 and 10 mg/L; the IC50 was estimated at 0.26 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.22-0.33). Iclaprim was about 10 times more active than trimethoprim, which had an IC50 of 2.3 mg/L. Iclaprim demonstrated synergistic effects at concentrations of 0.02, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/L when combined with subinhibitory concentrations of sulfamethoxazole (0.1 or 0.02 mg/L). These results show that iclaprim is a potent inhibitor of T. gondii growth in vitro. In addition, iclaprim exhibited synergy in vitro when tested in the presence of sulfamethoxazole. Iclaprim should be further investigated as an agent for the treatment or prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction. Iclaprim is a diaminopyrimidine antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to Gram-positive pathogens.Aim. This analysis evaluates patients with wound infections from two Phase 3 trials of ABSSSI.Methodology. Six-hundred-two patients with wound infections from two Phase 3, double-blinded, randomized, multicenter, active controlled trials (REVIVE-1/-2) were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of iclaprim 80 mg compared with vancomycin 15 mg kg-1 administered intravenously every 12 h for 5-14 days. The primary endpoint was to determine whether iclaprim was non-inferior (10 % margin) to vancomycin in achieving a ≥20 % reduction from baseline in lesion size 48-72 h after starting study drug (early clinical response [ECR]). Safety was assessed.Results. In REVIVE-1, ECR was 83.5 % with iclaprim versus 79.7 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 3.77%, 95 % CI -4.50%, 12.04%). In REVIVE-2, ECR was 82.7 % with iclaprim versus 76.3 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 6.38%, 95 % CI -3.35%, 16.12%). In the pooled dataset, iclaprim had similar ECR rates compared with vancomycin among wound infection patients (83.2 % vs 78.2 %) with a treatment difference of 5.01 % (95 % CI -1.29%, 11.32%). The safety profile was similar in iclaprim- and vancomycin-treated patients, except for a higher incidence of diarrhea with vancomycin (n=17) compared with iclaprim (n=6) and fatigue with iclaprim (n=17) compared with vancomycin (n=8).Conclusion. Based on early clinical response, iclaprim achieved non-inferiority to vancomycin with a similar safety profile in patients with wound infections suspected or confirmed as caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Iclaprim may be a valuable treatment option for wound infections.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Iclaprim is a novel diaminopyrimidine, which inhibits bacterial dihydrofolate reductase, and it is active against Gram-positive pathogens including emerging drug-resistant pathogens. In vitro activity of iclaprim and comparators against 1365 Gram-positive clinical isolates from patients with skin and skin structure infections (SSSI) from the United States, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Europe, Africa or Middle East collected between 2013 and 2017 were tested. Susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretations were based on CLSI criteria. MIC90 for all S.aureus, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. anginosus, S. constellatus, S. dysgalactiae and S. intermedius were 0.12, 0.12, 0.5, 0.03, 0.5, ≤0.004, ≤0.004, 0.12, and 0.008 µg/ml, respectively. The MIC for iclaprim was 8 to 32-fold lower than trimethoprim, the only FDA approved dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, against all Gram-positive isolates including resistant phenotypes. Iclaprim demonstrated lower MICs than trimethoprim against a collection (2013-2017) of Gram-positive clinical isolates from patients with SSSI from the United States, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Europe.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The spread of plasmid borne resistance enzymes in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates is rendering trimethoprim and iclaprim, both inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), ineffective. Continued exploitation of these targets will require compounds that can broadly inhibit these resistance-conferring isoforms. Using a structure-based approach, we have developed a novel class of ionized nonclassical antifolates (INCAs) that capture the molecular interactions that have been exclusive to classical antifolates. These modifications allow for a greatly expanded spectrum of activity across these pathogenic DHFR isoforms, while maintaining the ability to penetrate the bacterial cell wall. Using biochemical, structural, and computational methods, we are able to optimize these inhibitors to the conserved active sites of the endogenous and trimethoprim resistant DHFR enzymes. Here, we report a series of INCA compounds that exhibit low nanomolar enzymatic activity and potent cellular activity with human selectivity against a panel of clinically relevant TMP resistant (TMPR) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The incidence and patient outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus isolates by iclaprim MIC was determined among patients from two phase 3 studies for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), REVIVE-1 and -2. Iclaprim MIC90 values were 0.12 µg ml-1 for S. aureus (0.12 µg ml-1 against methicillin-sensitive and 0.25 µg ml-1 against methicillin-resistant S. aureus). The incidence of culture confirmed S. aureus isolates among patients with ABSSSI with an iclaprim MIC > 8 µg ml-1 was 2.0  % (16/790). The clinical outcomes varied by MICs for early clinical response (63-100  %), end of therapy response (81-100  %) and the test of cure response (75-100  %). For microbiological outcomes of these infections, the end of therapy response was 80-100  % and the test of cure response was 88-100  %.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of iclaprim versus vancomycin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in patients who were intravenous drug users (IVDUs). METHODS: A total of 621 patients who were IVDUs from 2 parallel Phase III, double-blind, randomized (1:1), active-controlled, multinational, multicenter trials (REVIVE-1 and REVIVE-2) were analyzed separately and pooled. This post hoc analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety profile of iclaprim 80 mg fixed dose compared with vancomycin 15 mg/kg administered intravenously during 2 h every 12 h for 5-14 days among this population. The primary end point of these studies was to determine whether iclaprim was noninferior (10% margin) to vancomycin in achieving a ≥20% reduction in lesion size at 48-72 h after initiation of treatment with the study drug (early clinical response) in the intent-to-treat population. The safety profile was assessed based on adverse events and laboratory parameters. FINDINGS: Iclaprim had higher early clinical response rates (85.8%; 95% CI, 81.5%-89.4%) compared with vancomycin (79.8%; 95% CI, 74.8%-84.2%) among patients with ABSSSIs who were IVDUs, with a treatment difference of +6.00% (95% CI, 0.06-12.0). The safety profile was similar in the iclaprim and vancomycin arms, with 3.7% and 5.0%, respectively, of patients discontinuing study therapy because of adverse events and 1.9% and 3.4%, respectively, of patients developing serious adverse events. IMPLICATIONS: Iclaprim had a higher early clinical response rate and favorable safety profile compared with vancomycin for the treatment of ABSSSIs in patients who were IVDUs. Iclaprim may be a valuable treatment option for ABSSSIs in this patient population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the in vitro activity of iclaprim and comparator agents against 7618 Gram-positive clinical isolates collected in the periods 2004-2006, 2012-2014 and 2015-2016. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the broth microdilution method and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. RESULTS: Iclaprim MIC50/MIC90 values were 0.06/0.12µg/mL for Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains, and 0.015/0.03, 0.12/0.5 and 0.03/0.06µg/mL, respectively, for Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus dysgalactiae over 8 years within the period from 2004 to 2016. Iclaprim was 8-32-fold more potent than trimethoprim. Against S. aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains, iclaprim was more active than standard-of-care intravenous antibiotics used to treat Gram-positive skin infections. Iclaprim was up to 16-fold more potent than vancomycin and linezolid and was 4-8-fold more potent than daptomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Iclaprim demonstrated potent and consistent activity among Gram-positive clinical isolates collected globally between 2004 and 2016.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Extracellular protein toxins contribute to the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. The present study compared the effects of iclaprim and trimethoprim - two folic acid synthesis inhibitors - with nafcillin and vancomycin on production of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), alpha haemolysin (AH) and toxic-shock syndrome toxin I (TSST-1) in methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (MRSA and VISA, respectively). METHODOLOGY: Northern blotting and RT-PCR were used to assess gene transcription; toxin-specific bioassays were used to measure protein toxin production. RESULTS: As shown previously, sub-inhibitory concentrations (sub-MIC) of nafcillin increased and prolonged MRSA toxin gene transcription and enhanced PVL, TSST-1 and AH production. Sub-inhibitory doses of iclaprim and trimethoprim delayed maximal AH gene (hla) transcription and suppressed AH production; both drugs delayed, but neither reduced, maximal TSST-1 production. Trimethoprim significantly increased lukF-PV expression and PVL production compared to both untreated and iclaprim-treated cultures. Higher concentrations of iclaprim and trimethoprim markedly suppressed MRSA growth, mRNA synthesis and toxin production. In VISA, iclaprim, vancomycin and nafcillin variably increased tst and hla expression, but only nafcillin increased toxin production. Despite its ability to increase hla expression, iclaprim was the most potent inhibitor of AH production. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, due to its ability to suppress toxin production, iclaprim should be effective against severe staphylococcal infections caused by toxin-producing MRSA and VISA strains, especially given its ability to concentrate at sites of infection such as skin and skin structures and the lung.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Iclaprim, a selective bacterial dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, and other antibiotics were tested against Gram-positive isolates from two phase 3 studies of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) (REVIVE-1 and -2). Seven hundred ninety baseline isolates, including Staphylococcus aureus, ß-hemolytic streptococci, and Streptococcus anginosus group, underwent antibacterial susceptibility testing. Iclaprim had an MIC90 of 0.12 µg/ml for S. aureus (0.12 µg/ml for methicillin susceptible, 0.25 µg/ml for methicillin resistant), 0.25 µg/ml for ß-hemolytic streptococci, and 0.008 µg/ml for S. anginosus group. Iclaprim demonstrated potent activity against these Gram-positive ABSSSI isolates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In this pilot study, the in vitro antimicrobial activity of iclaprim, a diaminopyrimidine, tested in combination with other antimicrobials against recent and common Gram-positive and Gram-negative respiratory pathogens, was examined by the checkerboard method. The range of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for iclaprim against all bacteria tested in the study was 0.03 to >128 µg ml-1. Iclaprim exhibited synergy with sulfamethoxazole against 11 of the 16 bacterial strains tested, with mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values of 0.2-0.5. Synergy with sulfamethoxazole was demonstrated against all Gram-positive bacteria and selected Gram-negative bacteria. Neither synergy nor antagonism was observed for combinations of iclaprim with ampicillin, meropenem, tetracycline, levofloxacin, aztreonam, piperacillin/tazobactam, colistin, cefepime or gentamicin against any of the bacterial strains tested. The significant reduction in the MIC values observed with the combination of iclaprim and sulfamethoxazole demonstrates that this regimen could be effective against common Gram-positive and selected Gram-negative respiratory bacteria.

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common non-gonococcal aetiology of septic arthritis. The efficacy of iclaprim against S. aureus LS-1, a clinical strain identified from a patient with septic arthritis, was studied in MF1 mice to evaluate the activity of iclaprim, which is in clinical development, in preventing joint infections. Iclaprim (2.5-80 mg kg- 1) administered as a single dose via the tail vein reduced the incidence of S. aureus septic arthritis and mortality in an experimental murine model of septic arthritis.

RESUMEN

The efficacy of iclaprim against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and its corresponding isogenic TK-deficient mutant S. aureus strain AH 1246 mixed with cytodex beads was studied in a mouse abscess infection model. Iclaprim (2-80 mg kg-1) administered as a single dose via the subcutaneous route (2 h post-infection) was efficacious against the TK-deficient mutant with 1 and 2 log10 c.f.u. reductions at the 24 h post initiation of treatment time point, at doses of 14.4 and 30 mg kg-1, respectively. In contrast, poor antibacterial activity was observed against corresponding wild-type (TK-competent) S. aureus strain, ATCC 25923, at all doses tested. The PK/PD parameter which appeared to correlate best with efficacy was AUC/MIC (R2=0.91). This study showed that TK-deficient mutants may be used to evaluate DHFRi activity and PK/PD relationship in a mouse abscess model.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitors are inhibited in the presence of free thymidine in the growth milieu and in rodent efficacy models. However, for thymidine kinase (TK) deficient mutant bacteria, the presence of free thymidine does not impact the activity of DHFR inhibitors, and these mutants were used to assess the in vivo efficacy of the DHFR inhibitor, iclaprim. The efficacies of iclaprim, trimethoprim, and vancomycin were evaluated in a systemic mouse infection model. Female CD-1 mice were infected intraperitoneally (IP) with wild-type Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MSSA) or AW 6 (MRSA) or their corresponding isogenic TK-deficient mutant S. aureus strains AH 1246 and AH 1252. Iclaprim showed potent antibacterial activity against both the TK-deficient mutant S. aureus strains, with PD50 values of 1.8 and < 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, for strains AH 1246 and AH 1252. In contrast, poor antibacterial activity was observed against corresponding wild-type (TK competent) S. aureus strains, with PD50 values of 10.8 and 2.2 mg/kg, respectively, for strains ATCC 25923 and AW 6. This study confirms that thymidine plays an important antagonistic role when determining the efficacy of DHFR inhibitors in vivo. This is the first study to show that iclaprim is active against TK-deficient S. aureus strains in a systemic mouse infection model, and that TK-deficient mutants may be used to evaluate iclaprim's activity in rodent models in vivo.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Iclaprim is a diaminopyrimidine, which inhibits bacterial dihydrofolate reductase, and surveillance data prior to 2006 suggested that iclaprim was active against Gram-positive pathogens including emerging drug-resistant pathogens. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, we undertook testing iclaprim and comparators against 931 Gram-positive clinical isolates from the United States and Europe collected between 2015 and 2016. Susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretations were based on CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing criteria. MIC50/MIC90 was 0.03/0.12 for all Staphylococcus aureus, 0.06/0.06 for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, 0.03/0.12 for methicillin-resistant S. aureus, 0.12/0.5 for Streptococcus agalactiae, ≤0.015/≤0.015 for Streptococcus anginosus, 0.03/0.06 for Streptococcus dysgalactiae, and ≤0.015 /0.03 µg/mL for Streptococcus pyogenes. Iclaprim was active against a contemporary collection (2015-2016) of Gram-positive bacteria isolated from the skin or soft tissue from patients with SSSI from the United States and Europe.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Iclaprim is a selective bacterial dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitor. Although there are alternative options for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), iclaprim is differentiated from other available antibiotics. Areas covered: Iclaprim is under clinical development for ABSSSI. This review summarizes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, microbiology, clinical development program, and the differentiation of iclaprim from other antibiotics. Expert commentary: Iclaprim has a different mechanism of action (DHFR inhibitor) compared to most other antibiotics, is active and rapidly bactericidal against Gram-positive pathogens including antibiotic-resistant pathogens, and suppresses bacterial exotoxins (alpha hemolysin, Panton Valentine leukocidin, and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1). Compared to trimethoprim, iclaprim has lower MIC90s, can be given without a sulfonamide, overcomes select trimethoprim resistance, and does not cause hyperkalemia. Iclaprim is administered as a fixed dose, does not require dose adjustment in renally-impaired or obese patients, and was not associated with nephrotoxicity in the Phase 3 pivotal REVIVE studies. Iclaprim represents a novel, alternative option for the treatment of severe skin and skin structure infections due to Gram-positive bacteria, particularly in patients at risk of acute kidney injury.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Iclaprim is under clinical development for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and nosocomial pneumonia most often due to Gram-positive bacteria, including infections due to drug-resistant bacteria. In two recent Phase III studies of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, intravenous iclaprim 80 mg every 12 h was noninferior to dose-adjusted vancomycin. Additional studies are planned for patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Iclaprim represents an alternative for the treatment of severe skin and pulmonary infections due to Gram-positive bacteria.

Asunto(s)