RESUMEN

The use of invasive or noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring post-decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been a continuous matter of debate. Accordingly, this meta-analysis aims to examine the existing evidence of both approaches and compare their impact among patients undergoing DC, guiding clinical decision-making in the management of elevated ICP. The databases used were Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase. Inclusion criteria included: (1) English studies; (2) randomized and nonrandomized studies; (3) reporting on invasive OR noninvasive ICP monitoring after DC; (4) with at least one of the outcomes of interest: incidence of mortality, new cerebral hemorrhages, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale. The study followed the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Thirty-six studies were included in this meta-analysis, resulting in a sample of 1624 patients. One thousand two hundred eighty-six underwent invasive monitoring, and 338 underwent noninvasive methods. In the invasive group, a mortality rate of 17% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12%-22%), a good outcome rate of 58% (95% CI: 38%-49%), a poor outcome rate of 42% (95% CI: 21%-62%), and an overall incidence of new hemorrhages of 4% (95% CI: 0%-8%) were found. Whereas in the noninvasive sample, a mortality rate of 20% (95% CI: 15%-26%) and a good outcome rate of 38% (95% CI: 25%-52%) were obtained. It seems that the effectiveness of invasive and noninvasive ICP monitoring methods are comparable in post-DC patients. While invasive monitoring remains gold standard, noninvasive methods offer a safer and cost-effective alternative, potentially improving post-DC patient care, and can mostly be used simultaneously with invasive methods.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Optimizing the treatment of several neurosurgical and neurological disorders relies on knowledge of the intracranial pressure (ICP). However, exploration of normal ICP and intracranial pressure pulse wave amplitude (PWA) values in healthy individuals poses ethical challenges, and thus the current documentation remains scarce. This study explores ICP and PWA values for healthy adults without intracranial pathology expected to influence ICP. METHODS: Adult patients (age > 18 years) undergoing surgery for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm without any other neurological co-morbidities were included. Patients had a telemetric ICP sensor inserted, and ICP was measured in four different positions: supine, lateral recumbent, standing upright, and 45-degree sitting, at day 1, 14, 30, and 90 following the surgery. RESULTS: ICP in each position did not change with time after surgery. Median ICP was 6.7 mmHg and median PWA 2.1 mmHg in the supine position, while in the upright standing position median ICP was - 3.4 mmHg and median PWA was 1.9 mmHg. After standardization of the measurements from the transducer site to the external acoustic meatus, the median ICPmidbrain was 8.3 mmHg in the supine position and 1.2 mmHg in the upright standing position. CONCLUSION: Our study provides insights into normal ICP dynamics in healthy adults following a uncomplicated surgery for an unruptured aneurysm. These results suggest a slightly wider normal reference range for invasive intracranial pressure than previously suggested, and present the first normal values for PWA in different positions. Further studies are, however, essential to enhance our understanding of normal ICP. Trial registration The study was preregistered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT03594136) (11 July 2018).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Telemetric monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) in children with a complex cerebrospinal disorder might help parents distinguish acute and potential life-threatening symptoms of hydrocephalus from other illnesses. Research question: What is patient and parent perceptions of system utility of telemetric ICP monitoring, and how does a long-term telemetric implant influence daily life of both patients and their families? Material and methods: A qualitative case study design with a focus group interview including parents of children with a complex cerebrospinal fluid disorder and an implanted telemetric ICP sensor. Results: Three parents participated. Based on thematic analysis, three themes were created: 'Daily living with telemetric ICP monitoring', 'Parenting a child with a CSF disorder', and 'The healthy sibling'. The ICP sensor provided the parents with security and made them trust their intuition, while the possibility of home monitoring ensured stability for the entire family and had a calming effect on healthy siblings. Home monitoring was seen as the system's greatest advantages, whereas size, weight, and functionality of the external monitoring equipment were highlighted as disadvantages. Discussion and conclusion: All parents supported the telemetric ICP sensor as a valued tool in treatment guidance of their child and stated that advantages exceeded disadvantages. It was stated that the possibility of conducting ICP measurements at home reduced the need for acute hospital admissions, which consequently led to a more stable daily life for the entire family. Suggestions regarding technical improvements with focus on more compatible external monitoring equipment were raised by all parents included.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is commonly utilized for identifying pathologic ICP in cases of traumatic brain injury; however, its utility in hydrocephalic children has not been elucidated. Although patients with typical (pressure-active) hydrocephalus present with clear signs and/or symptoms and the need for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is often clear, others may have arrested or pressure-compensated hydrocephalus with pathologic ICP elevation masked by ambiguous signs or are completely asymptomatic. Without treatment these pathologic ICP elevations may affect neurologic development or crescendo over time leading to neurological decline. The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of ICP monitoring as a diagnostic tool in this relatively common patient population and identify ventriculomegaly patients with and without pathologic ICP, thus improving accuracy of identifying those with and without surgical needs. METHODS: 36 patients (≤ 17 years old) underwent 41 inpatient ICP recording sessions between 2016 and 2022 and were retrospectively reviewed. This included patients with a history of severe, nonprogressive ventriculomegaly and normal fundoscopic examinations lacking traditional signs and symptoms concerning for elevated ICP. Nighttime pathological plateau waves were defined as sustained elevations of ICP ≥ 2x baseline for a duration of ≥ 5 minutes. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 5.5 years old (range 0-17 years old). 46.3% of patients had prior endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), 14.6% had prior ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), and 39% were without prior surgical intervention. Roughly half (51.2%) of patients had congenital ventriculomegaly while other patients had ventriculomegaly due to other pathologies such as germinal matrix hemorrhage/intraventricular hemorrhage (GMH/IVH) (29.3%), stroke (4.9%), cerebral infections/meningitis (2.4%), or unknown etiology (12.2%). The average procedure time was 19.1 ± 10.5 minutes, and mean length of stay was 2.8 ± 0.7 days. Pathologic ICP was demonstrated in 12 cases (29.3%), 4 (33.3%) of which were asymptomatic. Pathologic ICP was found in 7 of 19 (36.8%) in the prior ETV group, 1 of 6 (16.7%) in prior shunt group, and 4 of 16 (25%) in the non-surgical group (p = 0.649). Among those with pathologic ICP, 6 (50%) cases received an ETV, 5 (41.7%) cases underwent VPS placement, and 1 (8.3%) case underwent a VPS revision. There were no infectious complications or cases of hemorrhage. 4 patients required repositioning of the ICP monitor due to dislodgement. CONCLUSION: Inpatient ICP monitoring is a safe and effective diagnostic tool for evaluating the presence of pathologic ICP in severe, persistent non-progressive ventriculomegaly. The use of ICP monitoring may aid in identifying patients with pressure-compensated hydrocephalus who demonstrate pathologic ICP where surgical intervention may be warranted, while preventing unnecessary CSF diversion in those without pathology.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: External ventricular drain (EVD) implantation is one of the fundamental procedures of emergency neurosurgery usually performed freehand at bedside or in the operating room using anatomical landmarks. However, this technique is frequently associated with malpositioning leading to complications or dysfunction. Here, we describe a novel navigated bedside EVD insertion technique, which is evaluated in a clinical case series with the aim of safety, accuracy, and efficiency in neurosurgical emergency settings. METHODS: From 2021 to 2022, a mobile health-assisted navigation instrument (Thomale Guide, Christoph Miethke, Potsdam, Germany) was used alongside a battery-powered single-use drill (Phasor Health, Houston, USA) for bedside EVD placement in representative neurosurgical pathologies in emergency situations requiring ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) relief and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. RESULTS: In all 12 patients (8 female and 4 male), navigated bedside EVDs were placed around the foramen of Monro at the first ventriculostomy attempt. The most frequent indication was aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Mean operating time was 25.8 ± 15.0 min. None of the EVDs had to be revised due to malpositioning or dysfunction. Two EVDs were converted into a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Drainage volume was 41.3 ± 37.1 ml per day in mean. Mean length of stay of an EVD was 6.25 ± 2.8 days. Complications included one postoperative subdural hematoma and cerebrospinal fluid infection, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining a mobile health-assisted navigation instrument with a battery-powered drill and an appropriate ventricular catheter may enable and enhance safety, accuracy, and efficiency in bedside EVD implantation in various pathologies of emergency neurosurgery without adding relevant efforts.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is defined as a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure (OP) greater than 25 cmH2O. When a diagnostic lumbar puncture is performed it is useful to estimate also intracranial pressure. To do this it is required a presence of pressure gauges, which are currently the gold standard, not available in most resource-constrained contexts. We decided to evaluate whether it is possible to estimate it simply by counting the drops of cerebrospinal liquor, which are collected after lumbar puncture, according to Poiseuille's law. Was examined a sample of 52 patients, aged between 18 and 85 years, belonging to the emergency room of "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital in Pozzuoli (Naples) who needed a diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP). The ICP was initially measured using a standard narrow-gauge manometer by attaching it to the spinal needle. After removing the pressure gauge, the number of drops of cerebrospinal fluid flowing from the spinal needle in 30  seconds was counted. A statistical analysis was made with linear regression and ROC analysis. OP as measured by standard manometry was raised on 17 occasions with CSF drop rate median of 47 drops/30 seconds and range 30-74 drops/30 seconds. OP was normal on 35 occasions with CSF drop rate median of 23 drops/30 seconds  with range of 14-34 drops/30 seconds. A linear regression analysis was performed which resulted in a Pearson correlation of 0.936 an adjusted R square of 0.874 (see Fig. 1). Analysis through ANOVA documented an F of 355.301 with p < 0.01 and Dubin Watson of 1.642. The analysis through ROC showed an AUC of 0.980, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91% if chosen as a limit, 29 drops in 30 seconds  (Youden Index of 0.9140). Therefore, we have concluded, that although there are several precautions, like patient's position, it is technically feasible to indirectly estimate cerebrospinal fluid pressure with good accuracy by counting the drops of cerebrospinal fluid flowing from a 22 G spinal needle.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: Literature on invasive neuromonitoring and bilateral decompressive craniectomies (BDC) in patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE)-mediated hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) is limited. Neuromonitoring can guide decision making and treatment escalation. Methods and results: We report a case of a 17 years-old male who was admitted to our hospital's intensive care unit for RSE. HIBI was detected on neuroimaging on this patient's second day of admission after he developed central diabetes insipidus (DI). Invasive neuromonitoring revealed raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain hypoxia as measured by reduced brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2). Treatments were escalated in a tiered fashion, including administration of hyperosmolar agents, analgesics, sedatives, and a neuromuscular blocking drug. Eventually, BDC was performed as a salvage therapy as a means of controlling refractory ICP crisis in the setting of diffuse cerebral edema (DCE) following HIBI. Discussion: SE-mediated HIBI can result in refractory ICP crisis. Neuromonitoring can help identify secondary brain injury (SBI), guide treatment strategies, including surgical interventions, and may lead to better outcomes.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neurological complications during full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) might be attributed to intracranial pressure (ICP) increase due to continuous saline infusion (CSI). Understanding CSI and ICP correlation might modify irrigation pump usage. This study aimed to evaluate invasive ICP during interlaminar FESS; correlate ICP with irrigation pump parameters (IPPs); evaluate ICP during saline outflow occlusion, commonly used to control bleeding and improve the surgeon's view; and, after durotomy, simulate accidental dural tear. METHODS: Five swine were monitored, submitted to total intravenous anesthesia, and positioned ventrally. A parenchymal catheter was installed through a skull burr for ICP monitoring. Lumbar interlaminar FESS was performed until exposure of neural structures. CSI was used within progressively higher IPPs (A [60 mm Hg, 350 mL/minute] to D [150 mm Hg, 700 mL/minute]), and ICP was documented. During each IPP, different situations were grouped: intact dura with open channels (A1-D1) or occlusion test (A2-D2); dural tear with open channels (Ax1-Dx1) or occlusion test (Ax2-Dx2). ICP <20 mm Hg was defined as safe. RESULTS: Basal average ICP was 8.1 mm Hg. Adjustment in total intravenous anesthesia or suspension of tests was necessary due to critical ICP or animal discomfort. It was safe to operate with all IPPs with opened drainage channels (A1-D1) even with dural tear (Ax1-Dx1). Several occlusion tests (A2-D2, Ax2-Dx2) caused ICP increase (e.g., 86.1 mm Hg) influenced by anesthetic state and hemodynamics. CONCLUSIONS: During FESS, CSI might critically raise ICP. Keeping drainage channels open, with ideal anesthetic state, ICP remains safe even with high IPPs, despite dural tear. Drainage occlusions can quickly raise ICP, being even more severe with higher IPPs. Total intravenous anesthesia may protect from ICP increase and may allow longer drainage occlusion or higher IPPs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Since its introduction in the 1960s, intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has become an indispensable tool in neurocritical care practice and a key component of the management of moderate/severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary utility of ICP monitoring is to guide therapeutic interventions aimed at maintaining physiological ICP and preventing intracranial hypertension. The rationale for such ICP maintenance is to prevent secondary brain injury arising from brain herniation and inadequate cerebral blood flow. There exists a large body of evidence indicating that elevated ICP is associated with mortality and that aggressive ICP control protocols improve outcomes in severe TBI patients. Therefore, current management guidelines recommend a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) target range of 60-70 mm Hg and an ICP threshold of >20 or >22 mm Hg, beyond which therapeutic intervention should be initiated. Though our ability to achieve these thresholds has drastically improved over the past decades, there has been little to no change in the mortality and morbidity associated with moderate-severe TBI. This is a result of the "one treatment fits all" dogma of current guideline-based care that fails to take individual phenotype into account. The way forward in moderate-severe TBI care is through the development of continuously derived individualized ICP thresholds. This narrative review covers the topic of ICP monitoring in TBI care, including historical context/achievements, current monitoring technologies and indications, treatment methods, associations with patient outcome and multi-modal cerebral physiology, present controversies surrounding treatment thresholds, and future perspectives on personalized approaches to ICP-directed therapy.

RESUMEN

Background: Air-pouch balloon-assisted probes have proven to be both simple and reliable tools for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. However, we experienced reproducible falsely high ICP measurements when the ICP probe was inserted into the intracerebral hematoma cavity. Thus, the aim of the experimental and translational study was to analyze the influence of ICP probe placement with regard to measured ICP values. Methods: Two Spiegelberg 3PN sensors were simultaneously inserted into a closed drain system and were connected to two separate ICP monitors thereby allowing for simultaneous ICP measurements. This closed system was also engineered to allow for pressure to be gradually increased in a controlled fashion. Once the pressure was verified using two identical ICP probes, one of the probes was coated with blood in an effort to replicate placement within an intraparenchymal hematoma. Pressures recorded using the coated probe and control probe were then recorded and compared across a range of 0-60 mmHg. In an effort to further the translational relevance of our results, two ICP probes were inserted in a patient that presented with a large basal ganglia hemorrhage that met criteria for ICP monitoring. One probe was inserted into the hematoma and the other into brain parenchyma; ICP values were recorded from both probes and the results compared. Results: The experimental set-up demonstrated a reliable correlation between both control ICP probes. Interestingly, the ICP probe covered with clot displayed a significantly higher average ICP value when compared to the control probe between 0 mmHg and 50 mmHg (p < 0.001); at 60 mmHg, there was no significant difference noted. Critically, this trend in discordance was even more pronounced in the clinical setting with the ICP probe placed within the hematoma cavity having reported significantly higher ICP values as compared to the probe within brain parenchyma. Conclusions: Our experimental study and clinical pilot highlight a potential pitfall in ICP measurement that may result secondary to probe placement within hematoma. Such aberrant results may lead to inappropriate interventions in an effort to address falsely elevated ICPs.

RESUMEN

Severe traumatic injury (sTBI) continues to be a common source of morbidity and mortality. While there have been several advances in understanding the pathophysiology of this injury, the clinical outcome has remained grim. These trauma patients often require multidisciplinary care and are admitted to a surgical service line, depending on hospital policy. A retrospective chart review spanning 2019-2022 was completed using the electronic health record of the neurosurgery service. We identified 140 patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of eight or less, ages 18-99, who were admitted to a level-one trauma center in Southern California. Seventy patients were admitted under the neurosurgery service, while the other half were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) service after initial assessment in the emergency department by both services to evaluate for multisystem injury. Between both groups, the injury severity scores that evaluated patients' overall injuries were not significantly different. The results demonstrate a significant difference in GCS change, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) change, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) change between the two groups. Furthermore, the mortality rate differed between neurosurgical care and other service care by 27% and 51%, respectively, despite similar Injury Severity Scores (ISS) (p=0.0026). Therefore, this data demonstrates that a well-trained neurosurgeon with critical care experience can safely manage a severe traumatic brain injury patient with an isolated head injury as a primary service while in the intensive care unit. Since injury severity scores did not differ between these two service lines, we further theorize that this is likely due to a deep understanding of the nuances of neurosurgical pathophysiology and Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines.

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 25-year-old female with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) who developed severe headaches during haemodialysis (HD). The headaches resolved several hours after each HD session. We were able to diagnose dialysis disequilibrium syndrome (DDS) following intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and use a novel strategy to treat her symptoms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Intracranial hypertension (IC-HTN) is significantly associated with higher risk for an unfavorable outcome in pediatric trauma. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is widely becoming a standard of neurocritical care for children. Methods: The present study was designed to evaluate influences of IC-HTN on clinical outcomes of pediatric TBI patients. Demographic, injury severity, radiologic characteristics were used as possible predictors of IC-HTN or of functional outcome. Results: A total of 118 pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients with severe TBI (sTBI) were included. Among sTBI cases, patients with GCS < 5 had significantly higher risk for IC-HTN and for mortality. Moreover, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between IC-HTN and severity scoring systems. Kaplan−Meier analysis determined a significant difference for good recovery among patients who had no ICP elevations, compared to those who had at least one episode of IC-HTN (log-rank chi-square = 11.16, p = 0.001). A multivariable predictive logistic regression analysis distinguished the ICP-monitored patients at risk for developing IC-HTN. The model finally revealed that higher ISS and Helsinki CT score increased the odds for developing IC-HTN (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The present study highlights the importance of ICP-guided clinical practices, which may lead to increasing percentages of good recovery for children.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Meningioma is a slow-growing tumor that can cause neurological emergency due to intracranial hypertension. The definitive therapy is indeed emergency resection, but it is not always possible in several countries due to limited capacity and/or capability of the emergency operating room. The use of intraparenchymal fiberoptic intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and decompressive craniectomy (DC) in cases of brain tumors might be possible, but it is uncommon. We report a meningioma patient in whom immediate meningioma resection was considered too risky due to intensive care unit (ICU) shortage during COVID-19 pandemic and, therefore, underwent these procedures as life-saving measures. Case presentation: A 24-year-old man was brought to the emergency room with a chief complaint of seizure. Physical examination was notable for decreased consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 11) and a dilated left pupil with intact light reflex. A contrasted Brain CT Scan revealed extra-axial mass on the left sphenoid with extensive tentacle edema, which pushed the midline structures 2 cm toward the contralateral side. Discussion: The patient was diagnosed with Left Sphenoid Meningioma. We decided to perform intraparenchymal fiberoptic ICP monitor insertion and DC considering the situation, device availability, safety, and efficacy. The patient slowly regained consciousness in the recovery room after the procedure. The best-observed GCS was 12. Two weeks afterward, the patient came back to our outpatient clinic neurologically intact. The patient was then planned for elective tumor resection. Conclusion: ICP monitoring and DC are not commonly performed on brain tumor cases. However, in suboptimal situations, these procedures might save lives. The present case showed that ICP monitor and DC were helpful in times of ICU shortage.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The principal aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and intracranial hypertension (IHT) in patients treated for moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). A secondary objective was to assess factors associated with ICP monitoring. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies that assessed ICP monitoring in moderate TBI. The meta-analysis was performed by using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies comprising 116,714 patients were pooled to estimate the overall prevalence of ICP monitoring and IHT (one episode or more of ICP > 20 mm Hg) after moderate TBI. The prevalence rate for ICP monitoring was 18.3% (95% confidence interval 8.1-36.1%), whereas the proportion of IHT was 44% (95% confidence interval 33.8-54.7%). Three studies were pooled to estimate the prevalence of ICP monitoring according to Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (≤ 10 vs. > 10). ICP monitoring was performed in 32.2% of patients with GCS ≤ 10 versus 15.2% of patients with GCS > 10 (p = 0.59). Both subgroups were highly heterogeneous. We found no other variables associated with ICP monitoring or IHT. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ICP monitoring in moderate TBI is low, but the prevalence of IHT is high among patients undergoing ICP monitoring. Current literature is limited in size and quality and does not identify factors associated with ICP monitoring or IHT. Further research is needed to guide the optimal use of ICP monitoring in moderate TBI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the utilization patterns of brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) monitoring following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and determine associations with mortality, health care use, and pulmonary toxicity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients from United States trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Databank between 2008 and 2016. We examined patients with severe TBI (defined by admission Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8) over the age of 18 years who survived more than 24 h from admission and required intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. The primary exposure was PbtO2 monitor placement. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, defined as death during the hospitalization or discharge to hospice. Secondary outcomes were examined to determine the association of PbtO2 monitoring with health care use and pulmonary toxicity and included the following: (1) intensive care unit length of stay, (2) hospital length of stay, and (3) development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Regression analysis was used to assess differences in outcomes between patients exposed to PbtO2 monitor placement and those without exposure by using propensity weighting to address selection bias due to the nonrandom allocation of treatment groups and patient dropout. RESULTS: A total of 35,501 patients underwent placement of an ICP monitor. There were 1,346 (3.8%) patients who also underwent PbtO2 monitor placement, with significant variation regarding calendar year and hospital. Patients who underwent placement of a PbtO2 monitor had a crude in-hospital mortality of 31.1%, compared with 33.5% in patients who only underwent placement of an ICP monitor (adjusted risk ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.76-0.93). The development of the ARDS was comparable between patients who underwent placement of a PbtO2 monitor and patients who only underwent placement of an ICP monitor (9.2% vs. 9.8%, adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: PbtO2 monitor utilization varied widely throughout the study period by calendar year and hospital. PbtO2 monitoring in addition to ICP monitoring, compared with ICP monitoring alone, was associated with a decreased in-hospital mortality, a longer length of stay, and a similar risk of ARDS. These findings provide further guidance for clinicians caring for patients with severe TBI while awaiting completion of further randomized controlled trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem usually resulting in mortality or severe disabling morbidities of the victims. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is recently recognized as an imperative modality in the management of severe TBI, whereas growing evidence, based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), suggests that ICP monitoring does not affect the outcome when compared with clinical and radiological data-based management. Also, ICP monitoring carries a considerable risk of intracranial infection that cannot be overlooked. The aim of this study is to assess the different aspects of our current local institutional management of severe TBI using non-invasive ICP monitoring for a potential need to change our management strategy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our data of TBI from June 2019 through January 2020. Patients with severe TBI were identified. Their demographics, Glasgow coma score (GCS) at presentation, treatments received, and imaging data were extracted from the charts. Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOS-E) at 6 months was also assessed for the patients. Results: Twenty patients with severe TBI were identified on chart review. Ten patients received only medical treatment measures to lower the ICP, whereas the other 10 patients had additional surgical interventions. In one patient, a ventriculostomy tube was inserted to monitor ICP and to drain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This was complicated by ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) and the tube was removed. In our cohort, the total mortality rate was 40%. The average GOS-E for the survivor patients managed without ICP monitoring based on the clinical and radiological data was 6.2 at 6 months follow-up. The 6-month overall good outcome, based on GOS-E, was 33.3%. Conclusion: Although recent guidelines advocate for the use of ICP monitoring in the management of severe TBI, they remain underutilized in our practice due to many factors. External ventricular drains were mainly used to drain CSF; however, the higher rates of VAIs in our institution compared with the literature-reported rates are not in favor of the use of ICP monitoring. We recommend doing a comparative study between our current practice using clinical-and radiological-based management and subdural or intraparenchymal bolts. More structured RCTs are needed to validate these findings in our setting.

RESUMEN

Introduction Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and analysis are techniques that are, each year, applied to millions of patients with pathologies with million of patients annually. The detection of the so called A and B-waves, and the analysis of subtle changes in C-waves, which are present in ICP waveform, may indicate decreased intracranial compliance, and may improve the clinical outcome. Despite the advances in the field of computerized data analysis, the visual screening of ICP continues to be the means principally employed to detect these waves. To the best of our knowledge, no review study has addressed automated ICP analysis in sufficient detail and a need to research the state of the art of ICP analysis has, therefore, been identified. Methodology This paper presents a systematic mapping study to provide answers to 7 research questions: publication time, venue and source trends, medical tasks undertaken, research methods used, computational systems developed, validation methodology, tools and systems employed for evaluation and research problems identified. An ICP software prototype is presented and evaluated as a consequence of the results. Results A total of 23 papers, published between 1990 and 2020, were selected from 6 online databases. After analyzing these papers, the following information was obtained: diagnosis and monitoring medical tasks were addressed to the same extent, and the main research method used was evaluation research. Several computational systems were identified in the papers, the main one being image classification, while the main analysis objective was single pulse analysis. Correlation with expert analysis was the most frequent validation method, and few of the papers stated the use of a published dataset. Few authors referred to the tools used to build or evaluate the proposed solutions. The most frequent research problem was the need for new analysis methods. These results have inspired us to propose a software prototype with which provide an automated solution that integrates ICP analysis and monitoring techniques. Conclusions The papers in this study were selected and classified with regard to ICP automated analysis methods. Several research gaps were identified, which the authors of this study have employed as a based on which to recommend future work. Furthermore, this study has identified the need for an empirical comparison between methods, which will require the use and development of certain standard metrics. An in-depth analysis conducted by means of systematic literature review is also required. The software prototype evaluation provided positive results, showing that the prototype may be a reliable system for A-wave detection.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The pulse waveform of intracranial pressure (ICP) is its distinctive feature almost always present in the clinical recordings. In most cases, it changes proportionally to rising ICP, and observation of these changes may be clinically useful. We introduce the higher harmonics centroid (HHC) which can be defined as the center of mass of harmonics of the ICP pulse waveform from the 2nd to 10th, where mass corresponds to amplitudes of these harmonics. We investigate the changes in HHC during ICP monitoring, including isolated episodes of ICP plateau waves. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Recordings from 325 patients treated between 2002 and 2010 were reviewed. Twenty-six patients with ICP plateau waves were identified. In the first step, the correlation between HHC and ICP was examined for the entire monitoring period. In the second step, the above relation was calculated separately for periods of elevated ICP during plateau wave and the baseline. RESULTS: For the values averaged over the whole monitoring period, ICP (22.3 ± 6.9 mm Hg) correlates significantly (R = 0.45, p = 0.022) with HHC (3.64 ± 0.46). During the ICP plateau waves (ICP increased from 20.9 ± 6.0 to 53.7 ± 9.7 mm Hg, p < 10-16), we found a significant decrease in HHC (from 3.65 ± 0.48 to 3.21 ± 0.33, p = 10-5). CONCLUSIONS: The good correlation between HHC and ICP supports the clinical application of pressure waveform analysis in addition to the recording of ICP number only. Mean ICP may be distorted by a zero drift, but HHC remains immune to this error. Further research is required to test whether a decline in HHC with elevated ICP can be an early warning sign of intracranial hypertension, whether individual breakpoints of correlation between ICP and its centroid are of clinical importance.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The placement of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring system requires drilling an orifice in the skull. Bone fragments can accidentally be inserted into the brain parenchyma while introducing the ICP monitoring system during the procedure. An intracranial granuloma can be subsequently formed if a non-specific reaction is induced and maintained by the inserted bone fragment in the brain parenchyma. These intracranial granulomas may eventually be confused with brain masses on follow-up imaging studies. We present the case of a 65-year-old male who underwent cranial surgery secondary to a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). An intracranial bolt was initially placed contralaterally to measure the ICP. Eleven years later, a granuloma from a retained bone fragment secondary to the intracranial bolt placement was suspected. The clinical course, radiological investigations, and differential diagnosis are presented.