RESUMEN

Introduction: Glaucoma, one leading cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide, is primarily caused by elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Recently, minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) have become popular due to their shorter surgical times, tissue-sparing nature, and faster recovery. One such MIGS, the Hydrus® nickel-titanium alloy Microstent, helps lower IOP by improving aqueous humor outflow. The NIDEK GS-1 automated 360° gonioscope provides advanced imaging of the chamber angle for evaluation and documentation. The aim of this study was to test automated 360° gonioscopy for the detection of postoperative positional variations after Hydrus® Microstent implantation. This study is the largest to date to evaluate post-op positioning of the Hydrus® Microstent using the NIDEK GS-1. Materials and Methods: This study analyzed postoperative outcomes and stent location in eyes diagnosed with mild to moderate glaucoma that underwent Hydrus® Microstent implantation with or without phacoemulsification. Patients with prior IOP-lowering surgery or vitrectomy were excluded. Analyses of the postoperative Hydrus® Microstent position were based on the evaluation of automated 360° gonioscopy images. Results: Twenty-three eyes were included in the study, and all showed a reduction in IOP and a decrease in antiglaucomatous drop use postoperatively. Postoperative gonoscopic images showed variations in implant position. In all cases, the proximal inlet was clearly visible in the anterior chamber. The degree of protrusion into the anterior chamber was variable. The distal tip of the stent was visible behind the trabecular meshwork in Schlemm's canal in five cases, in the anterior chamber in one case, and not visible in seven cases. In no case did postoperative alterations in the position of the implant lead to explantation. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the Hydrus® Microstent can effectively lower IOP even in the presence of postoperative positional variations. Automated 360° gonioscopy was found to be a useful tool to verify and document the postoperative position of the implant. Positional changes did not require device explantation in any of the cases evaluated.

RESUMEN

Purpose: The Hydrus microstent was approved by the FDA in August 2018 for use with cataract surgery to reduce IOP in patients with mild to moderate primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Pivotal clinical trials demonstrated its overall safety and efficacy in lowering IOP. However, malpositioning of the implant can result in uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome necessitating device explantation. Here we report four such cases and their associated challenges. We also highlight the importance of early recognition of post-operative complications for ease of implant removal. Observations: Case 1: A 75-year-old female patient was referred for chronic granulomatous anterior uveitis with cystoid macular edema (CME) and uncontrolled IOP in the left eye after cataract extraction with Hydrus implantation. On gonioscopy, the implant was occluded and embedded in the iris. The patient underwent removal of the Hydrus implant 10 months after the initial surgery with canaloplasty to control IOP.Case 2: A 71-year-old male patient on dual anti-platelet developed intraoperative hyphema during cataract extraction with Hydrus microstent in the right eye. Post-operatively, clopidogrel was stopped, but hyphema persisted with uncontrolled IOP. The Hydrus was noted to be syneched against the iris face. The patient underwent anterior chamber washout with Hydrus explantation and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation 16 days after the first surgery.Case 3: A 76-year-old patient developed persistent granulomatous anterior uveitis in the left eye after cataract extraction with Hydrus microstent. On gonioscopy, the Hydrus ostium was seen resting on the iris without occlusion, and the patient underwent Hydrus removal with nasal goniotomy 3 months after initial surgery.Case 4: A 63-year-old patient underwent cataract extraction with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and a complex Hydrus microstent implantation requiring multiple attempts. Eleven months later, the patient was found to have uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome and macular edema, and the Hydrus was noted to be insufficiently inserted and posteriorly rotated with contact against the iris. The Hydrus was explanted, and nasal goniotomy was performed. Conclusions and importance: Hydrus microstents that are malpositioned can result in persistent uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome. Explantation between 2 weeks and 11 months successfully resolved post-operative uveitis and hyphema, but all cases required additional glaucoma-hyphema syndrome. Early recognition is important since late removal was more challenging due to the implant becoming embedded in the iris.

RESUMEN

Purpose: This study seeks to highlight and explore the occurrence of uveitis with obstructive peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) after a combined OMNI canaloplasty and Hydrus microstent implantation with phacoemulsification, particularly in a patient with a background of psoriatic arthritis. Observations: A 56-year-old male with a medical history of psoriatic arthritis (in remission for 10 years) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) underwent a combined OMNI canaloplasty and Hydrus microstent with phacoemulsification. The surgical procedure was uncomplicated. However, within 2 weeks postsurgery, the patient presented with severe symptoms, including uveitis, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), and a significant reduction in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). This postoperative response was unexpected, especially given the lack of any past history of uveitis in the patient. The complication, potentially influenced by the patient's history of psoriatic arthritis, led to the need for additional interventions, including the implantation of an Ahmed glaucoma valve. Conclusion: This case underscores the potential for postoperative complications, specifically uveitis with obstructive PAS, following combined OMNI canaloplasty and Hydrus microstent with phacoemulsification, especially in patients with a history of autoimmune diseases. Careful preoperative history, postoperative monitoring, and a nuanced approach to surgical planning are crucial. The association between systemic inflammatory conditions and ocular complications warrants deeper exploration to ensure optimal patient care. How to cite this article: Dossantos J, An J. A Rare Case of Postoperative Uveitis and Obstructive Peripheral Anterior Synechiae Following Combined OMNI Canaloplasty and Hydrus Microstent Implantation. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2024;18(1):37-41.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) are now a consolidated reality in many surgical units. The Hydrus Microstent is one of several MIGS devices bypassing trabecular outflow and had excellent results over the years. This article aims to review the key features of the Hydrus Microstent in terms of design, efficacy, and safety. AREAS COVERED: The present review analyses the main characteristics of the device by evaluating the technical and physical details of its functioning. The evidence that supports a clinical decision summarizes the most influential clinical trials and the most accurate systematic reviews. EXPERT OPINION: The Hydrus device has been extensively studied regarding biocompatibility and outflow potential. The subsequent clinical studies have been well-built and proved that the device effectively reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) and the eyedrop load. The device covers almost a quarter of Schlemm's canal circumference, offering at least two advantages: cannulating the Schlemm's canal provides evidence that the device has been implanted correctly; covering a larger area potentially allows to target multiple collector channels or at least areas of active outflow. This scaffold may prove more effective in naïve patients or subjects who used antiglaucoma eyedrops for a limited period, as the prolonged use of hypotonic medications has been associated with the surgical failure of ab interno microhook trabeculotomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has revolutionized glaucoma care with its favorable safety profile and ability to delay or minimize the need for traditional, bleb-based procedures. Microstent device implantation is a type of angle-based MIGS, which reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) through bypass of the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork (TM) and facilitation of aqueous outflow into the Schlemm's canal. Although there are limited microstent devices on the market, multiple studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of iStent® (Glaukos Corp.), iStent Inject® (Glaukos Corp.), and Hydrus® Microstent (Alcon) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma, with and without concurrent phacoemulsification. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive evaluation of injectable angle-based microstent MIGS devices in the treatment of glaucoma.

RESUMEN

Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of combined phacoemulsification with iStent inject (Phaco-iStent) and Hydrus microstent (Phaco-Hydrus). Methods: This was a retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent Phaco-iStent from April 2019 to August 2020 and Phaco-Hydrus from August 2019 to December 2020 at a tertiary eye centre in Singapore. Sixty-nine Phaco-iStent eyes and 49 Phaco-Hydrus eyes were included in this study. Complete surgical success was defined as freedom from second glaucoma surgery, Intraocular pressure (IOP) of 18 mmHg or less, and discontinuation of all antiglaucoma medications. Results: At 12 months, both Phaco-iStent and Phaco-Hydrus groups had comparable surgical success rate (68.1% vs 51%, p=0.061), reduction in antiglaucoma medication use (-1.3 ± 0.1 vs -1.4 ± 0.10, p=0.880) and intraocular pressure reduction (-1.1 ± 0.5 mmHg vs -1.6 ± 0.9 mmHg, p=0.323). Overall intraoperative and postoperative complications rate were similar in both groups, though hyphema was more commonly seen in early postoperative period in the Phaco-Hydrus compared to the Phaco-iStent group (8% vs 0%, p=0.028), with majority of cases resolving without any need for surgical intervention. Device obstruction was also more common in the Phaco-Hydrus group compared to the Phaco-iStent group (14% vs 4.3%, p=0.04). Conclusion: Phaco-iStent and Phaco-Hydrus have similar surgical efficacy and safety profiles at 12 months.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: HORIZON trials have reported the medium- and long-term outcomes of the Hydrus microstent. However, outside of randomized clinical trials, outcomes beyond 24 months have not been previously reported. Here, we examine the 3-year outcomes of the Hydrus microstent with cataract surgery outside of a randomized clinical trial setting. DESIGN: Single-surgeon consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: Glaucomatous eyes that underwent implantation of a Hydrus microstent with concomitant cataract surgery at a single ophthalmology center in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: Success was defined according to the absence of specific failure criteria: (A) glaucoma reoperation; (B) selective laser trabeculoplasty; (C) intraocular pressure (IOP) < 5 mmHg, > 18 mmHg, or increase in the number of antiglaucoma medications (AGMs) used (after the first postoperative month), or loss of light perception due to glaucoma; (D) aggregation of criteria A-C. Predictors of treatment failure and postoperative changes in IOP and AGM use were assessed. Safety included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness, visual field mean deviation (VF-MD) and pattern standard deviation (VF-PSD), and adverse events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical success, predictors of treatment failure, postoperative changes in IOP and AGM use, and structural and functional markers of disease stability. RESULTS: One hundred six eyes were included. The 3-year surgical success according to Criteria A to D was 86%, 83%, 91%, and 67%, respectively. Intraocular pressure decreased by 26.5% from 18.9 ± 4.8 to 13.9 ± 2.3 mmHg (P < 0.001) and AGM use reduced by 33% from 3.0 ± 1.2 to 2.0 ± 1.2 medications (P < 0.001). The postoperative improvement in BCVA was preserved (P < 0.001). The structural and functional markers of disease stability, including CDR, RNFL, and GC-IPL thickness, as well as VF-MD and VF-PSD, remained stable (P > 0.05). Postoperative adverse events were few and transient. CONCLUSIONS: The 36-month results from this study show that the Hydrus microstent with phacoemulsification is safe and effective in reducing the IOP and AGM among patients with mild to severe open-angle glaucoma and can slow down the disease progression by preserving both structural and functional parameters. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: To report a series of 8 phakic eyes of 8 patients with open angle glaucoma with uncontrolled intraocular pressure on maximum tolerable medical therapy receiving Hydrus Microstent implants combined with concomitant OMNI Surgical System ab interno canaloplasty. Observations: 8 phakic eyes underwent Hydrus Microstent implantation with OMNI Surgical System ab interno canaloplasty. 2 patients underwent concurrent Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy and 1 patient underwent a concurrent micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. 6 out of 8 eyes achieved successful intraocular pressure reduction. Only 1 achieved success without the need for additional medical therapy. 1 required Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser to clear iris obstruction of the Hydrus inlet and 1 required selective laser trabeculoplasty for additional intraocular pressure lowering. 2 out of 8 eyes required subsequent incisional glaucoma surgery for unacceptable intraocular pressure levels despite maximum tolerable medical therapy. Conclusions and Importance: The Hydrus Microstent combined with OMNI Surgical System ab interno canaloplasty can safely and successfully reduce intraocular pressure in phakic patients with open-angle glaucoma with uncontrolled intraocular pressure on maximum tolerable medical therapy with a low complication rate and rapid visual recovery.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To compare real-world 24-month outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with either iStent inject or Hydrus Microstent. METHODS: Analysis of data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness (FGB) international registry. Anonymized data from 344 eyes with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma or ocular hypertension that underwent phacoemulsification combined with either iStent inject (224) or Hydrus Microstent (120) were included. Data were adjusted for baseline characteristics using linear regression and propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was a comparison of mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at 24 months. RESULTS: At 24 months, there was no significant difference in IOP reduction between the two groups, consistent across all analyses. The matched cohort showed iStent inject achieved 3.1 mmHg reduction and Hydrus a 2.3 mmHg reduction (p = 0.530) and a mean medication reduction of 1.0 for iStent inject versus 0.5 for Hydrus (p = 0.081). 5.4% of eyes in the iStent inject group and 7.5% of eyes in the Hydrus group required subsequent procedures to improve IOP control within 24 months. Complications were rare with no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four-month outcomes showed sustained IOP reduction with a good safety profile for both groups. There was no significant difference in IOP outcomes between the groups. There may be a small additional reduction in glaucoma medication usage following cataract surgery with iStent inject compared to Hydrus.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A 58-year-old male who underwent cataract extraction with combined intraocular lens and Hydrus® Microstent (Ivantis Inc, Irvine, CA, US) implantation 2 years ago in the right eye (OD) due to advanced glaucoma presented with blurry vision in right eye (OD) for 3 months. The visual acuity was 20/60 and slit-lamp examination indicated mild anterior chamber inflammation with unexposed, functioning tube shunt superotemporally in OD. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated cystoid macular edema (CME) with subretinal fluid. Fluorescein angiography demonstrated petaloid pattern leakage of CME. Gonioscopy revealed a kinked appearance of a Hydrus® Microstent protruding into the anterior chamber and causing iris chafing. Topical ketorolac tromethamine and prednisolone acetate were started. At the 2nd month of follow-up, the anterior chamber was quiet, and the CME resolved completely. Protruded kinked Hydrus® Microstent may lead to acute iridocyclitis and CME through iris chafing, which may be responsive to topical anti-inflammatory drops.

RESUMEN

We report on a 56-year-old male with primary open-angle glaucoma who underwent mitomycin C augmented canaloplasty enabling filtration in the right eye after cataract surgery combined with a Schlemm's canal microstent 3 years previously. He showed progressive glaucomatous optic neuropathy and was highly myopic (axial length 32.05 mm, spherical equivalent -18.75 dioptres in the right eye). Augmented canaloplasty was performed uneventfully and 360° catheterisation was achieved followed by the placement of a 10-0 polypropylene suture in Schlemm's canal. Intraocular pressure (IOP) in the first post-operative day was reduced from 19 to 6 mmHg. At 1-month follow-up IOP was 12 mmHg off glaucoma medications. The presence of a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) device did not hinder successful catheterisation of Schlemm's canal. Significant reduction of IOP was obtained in the early post-surgical period. No intra-operative complications were registered and only transient hyphema in early post-operative period was reported. This augmented canaloplasty could be an effective alternative to trabeculectomy even after Schlemm's canal microstent implantation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose was to determine the real-world efficacy of phacoemulsification cataract surgery and Hydrus microstent in Black and Afro-Latinx patients with glaucoma. METHODS: A retrospective noncomparative single-center study of 76 Black and Afro-Latinx patients with glaucoma who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery and Hydrus microstent placement for treatment of glaucoma at single practice. Investigated parameters were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, mean deviation on visual field test, and visual acuity. Patients were also subgrouped into mild, moderate, and advance glaucoma for further analysis. RESULTS: We reviewed a total of 76 patients who had 6 months of follow up in the study. The mean number of medications decreased significantly from 2.6 ± 1.5 preoperatively to 0.72 ± 1.4 in 6 months (p < 0.0010), while IOP decreased from 14.7 ± 3.7 to 13.9 ± 4.3 (p = 0.25). At 6 months, 55 patients (74%) of all patients were medication free (n = 27, 84.4% mild glaucoma; n = 17, 70.8% moderate glaucoma; n = 10, 50% advance glaucoma). There was significant improvement in visual acuity (p < 0.00010) and stabilization of mean deviation on visual field test (baseline -9.2; 6 months -9.1; p = 0.22). The most common adverse effect was a transient IOP spike and transient corneal edema (n = 6, 7.9%; n = 6, 7.9%, respectively) with spontaneous resolution in all cases. No sight-threatening complications were reported at 6 months. CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This 6-month retrospective study demonstrated the efficacy of phacoemulsification cataract surgery and Hydrus microstent in reducing the medication burden while maintaining lower IOP in Black and Afro-Latinx patients with glaucoma.

RESUMEN

In the management of glaucoma, recent and upcoming innovations have the potential to contribute to both the efficacy of intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring and the number of available treatment options. These new devices and procedures have two things in common: they are part of the trend in medicine towards miniaturization, and they require a limited surgical procedure to become effective. This review focuses on the Eyemate (Argos) intraocular sensor, which offers a new way to reliably measure 24 h IOP, and on intraocular sustained release systems for pharmacological glaucoma therapy. It also briefly reflects on the miniature implants currently used in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS).

RESUMEN

Surgical options for glaucoma have expanded in recent years. This article provides an evidence-based update on the novel or emerging surgical techniques for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma that are based on the Schlemm's canal (SC). Canaloplasty is an ab externo approach and was developed as an alternative to traditional filtering surgeries. The Hydrus microstent (Ivantis Inc., Irvine, CA) is a so-called SC scaffold that directly bypasses the trabecular meshwork to drain aqueous humor into the SC, which it keeps dilated over approximately one quadrant. Canaloplasty has also been shown to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) by up to 40% and combined with cataract surgery. IOP was lowered 44% at 24 months while maintaining a favorable safety profile. The Hydrus device has been proposed as an adjunct to cataract extraction surgery. To date, no published evidence from clinical trials is available on its in vivo safety and efficacy. Schlemm's canal based glaucoma procedures show promise as alternative treatments to traditional glaucoma surgery. Surgeons must be comfortable with angle anatomy. A prerequisite for functionality of these techniques is the integrity of the distal outflow system. At present, however, it is not possible to conclude whether these novel procedures will be viable alternatives to standard filtering surgery over the long-term.

Asunto(s)