RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Identify the costs of an oncology patient at the end of life. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted by screening Embase, PubMed and Lilacs databases, including all studies evaluating end-of-life care costs for cancer patients up to March 2024. The review writing followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Drummond checklist. The protocol is available at PROSPERO CRD42023403186. RESULTS: A total of 733 studies were retrieved, and 43 were considered eligible. Among the studies analyzed, 41,86% included all types of neoplasms, 18.60% of lung neoplasm, All articles performed direct cost analysis, and 9.30% also performed indirect cost analysis. No study evaluated intangible costs, and most presented the macrocosting methodology from the payer's perspective. The articles included in this review presented significant heterogeneity related to populations, diagnoses, periods considered for evaluation of end-of-life care, and cost analyses. Most of the studies were from a payer perspective (74,41%) and based on macrocosting methodologies (81,39%), which limit the use of the information to evaluate variabilities in the consumption of resources. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the complexity of end-of-life care and the need for consistent data on costs in this period, new studies, mainly in low- and middle-income countries with approaches to indirect and intangible costs, with a societal perspective, are important for public policies of health in accordance with the trend of transforming value-based care, allowing the health care system to create more value for patients and their families.

RESUMEN

While the estimate of hospital costs concerns the past, its planning focuses on the future. However, in many low and middle-income countries, public hospitals do not have robust accounting health systems to evaluate and project their expenses. In Brazil, public hospitals are funded based on government estimates of available hospital infrastructure, historical expenditures and population needs. However, these pieces of information are not always readily available for all hospitals. To solve this challenge, we propose a flexible simulation-based optimisation algorithm that integrates this dual task: estimating and planning hospital costs. The method was applied to a network of 17 public hospitals in Brazil to produce the estimates. Setting the model parameters for population needs and future hospital infrastructure can be used as a cost-projection tool for divestment, maintenance, or investment. Results show that the method can aid health managers in hospitals' global budgeting and policymakers in improving fairness in hospitals' financing.

Asunto(s)

Costos de Hospital , Hospitales Públicos , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Brasil , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Algoritmos

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The growing older population increases proportionately the demand for hospital care due to the increase in health problems. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of hospitalizations, and to investigate associated factors in older adults from the Zona da Mata of Minas Gerais, Brazil, between 2016-2018. Secondly, to provide a more comprehensive epidemiological overview of hospitalizations, the following were estimated: monthly hospitalization rate; hospital mortality rate; frequency of hospitalizations according to diagnosis, hospitalizations for conditions sensitive to primary care and in-hospital death; and hospital costs. METHODS: This is an ecological and descriptive-analytic study. Data were obtained from the Brazilian Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS). RESULTS: The prevalence of hospitalizations was 35.1% (31.2% in women and 39.7% in men). The monthly rate of hospitalizations was higher in older men when compared with older women (Rate-Ratio=1.35 [95% CI=1.27-1.43]) and adult men between 40­59 years (Rate Ratio=2.42 [95% CI=2.26-2.58]). The cumulative incidence of hospitalization was 144/1,000 older persons (125/1,000 women and 169/1,000 men). Factors significantly associated with hospitalizations were: male sex (PR=1.52 [95% CI=1.11-2.08]); hospitalization in surgical bed (PR=1.93 [95% CI=1.05-3.56]); absence of death (PR=1.94 [95% CI=1.03-3.65]); and hospital stay ≥15 days (PR=0.71 [95% CI=0.54 0.95]). The cost of hospitalizations was R$ 220,8 million (mean of R$ 201,700/day). CONCLUSÃO: The findings strengthen the need for preventive healthcare for the older population living in the Zona da Mata of Minas Gerais and alert managers to the substantial socioeconomic impact of hospitalizations.

---

INTRODUÇÃO: O crescente aumento da população idosa faz aumentar proporcionalmente a demanda por cuidados hospitalares devido ao aumento dos problemas de saúde. OBJETIVO: Estimar a prevalência e incidência de hospitalizações, e investigar fatores associados, em idosos da Zona da Mata Mineira, Brasil, entre 2016-2018. Secundariamente, com intuito de fornecer um panorama epidemiológico mais abrangente acerca das hospitalizações, foram estimadas: taxa mensal de hospitalização; taxa de mortalidade hospitalar; frequência de hospitalizações conforme o diagnóstico, internações por condições sensíveis à atenção primária (ICSAP) e óbito hospitalar; e custos hospitalares. MÉTODO: Trata-se de um estudo ecológico e descritivo-analítico. Os dados foram obtidos do Sistema de Informação Hospitalar brasileiro (SIH/SUS). RESULTADOS: A prevalência de hospitalizações em idosos foi de 35,1% (31,2% em mulheres e 39,7% em homens). A taxa mensal de hospitalização foi maior em homens idosos quando comparados com mulheres idosas (Razão-de-Taxas=1,35 [IC 95%=1,27-1,43]) e homens adultos entre 40­59 anos (Razão-de-Taxas=2,42 [IC 95%=2,26-2,58]). A incidência acumulada de hospitalização foi de 144/1.000 idosos (125/1.000 mulheres e 169/1.000 homens). Os fatores significativamente associados com as hospitalizações foram: sexo masculino (RP=1,52 [IC 95%=1,11­2,08]), internação em leito cirúrgico (RP=1,93 [IC 95%=1,05­3,56]), ausência de óbito (RP=1,94 [IC 95%=1,03-3,65]) e permanência hospitalizado ≥15 dias (RP=0,71 [IC 95%=0,54-0,95]). O custo das hospitalizações foi de R$ 220,8 milhões (média de R$ 201,7 mil/dia). CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados reforçam a necessidade de cuidados preventivos à saúde da população idosa da Zona da Mata Mineira e alertam gestores para o substancial impacto socioeconômico gerado pelas hospitalizações.

Asunto(s)

Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Incidencia , Prevalencia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Sistemas de Información en Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Estudios Ecológicos

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the cost of advanced ovarian cancer, using the microcosting technique, based on real-world evidence from the perspective of a reference Brazilian public hospital. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer in 2017 and followed-up for up to 5 years. A bottom-up microcosting method was applied, using the activity-based cost approach, which evaluates service costs based on activity consumption throughout patients' journey. RESULTS: The results indicate a median overall survival of 35.3 months and a median age of 57 years (33-80 years old). The average cost per patient was USD 34 991.595 over a period of 35.3 months, with admissions because of the disease progression and end-of-life care being the most relevant. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the costs of activities currently involved in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer represent an important economic impact for the public health system. These data can support future analyses on the impact of incorporating new technologies for the treatment of ovarian cancer and on the financing and sustainability of the Brazilian public healthcare system.

Asunto(s)

Hospitales Públicos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Brasil/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Adulto , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas

RESUMEN

This is a cost analysis study based on hospital admissions, conducted from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), carried out in a cohort of patients hospitalized at the University Hospital of Brasília (UHB) due to Severe Acute Respiratory Infections (SARI) caused by COVID-19, from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022. An approach based on macro-costing was used, considering the costs per patient identified in the Hospital Admission Authorizations (HAA). Were identified 1,015 HAA from 622 patients. The total cost of hospitalizations was R$ 2,875,867.18 for 2020 and 2021. Of this total, 86.41 % referred to hospital services and 13.59 % to professional services. The highest median cost per patient identified was for May 2020 (R$ 19,677.81 IQR [3,334.81-33,041.43]), while the lowest was in January 2021 (R$ 1,698.50 IQR [1,602.70-2,224.11]). The high cost of treating patients with COVID-19 resulted in a high economic burden of SARI due to COVID-19 for UHB and, consequently, for SUS.

Asunto(s)

COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Humanos , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the hospital service utilization patterns and direct healthcare hospital costs before and during peritoneal dialysis (PD) at home. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with kidney failure (KF) was conducted at a Mexican Social Security Institute hospital for the year 2014. Cost categories included inpatient emergency room stays, inpatient services at internal medicine or surgery, and hospital PD. The study groups were (1) patients with KF before initiating home PD, (2) patients with less than 1 year of home PD (incident), and (3) patients with more than 1 year of home PD (prevalent). Costs were actualized to international dollars (Int$) 2023. RESULTS: We found that 53% of patients with KF used home PD services, 42% had not received any type of PD, and 5% had hospital dialysis while waiting for home PD. The estimated costs adjusting for age and sex were Int$5339 (95% CI 4680-9746) for patients without home PD, Int$17 556 (95% CI 15 314-19 789) for incident patients, and Int$7872 (95% CI 5994-9749) for prevalent patients; with significantly different averages for the 3 groups (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of services and cost is highest at the time of initiating PD, over time, using home PD leads to a significant reduction in use of hospital services, which translates into institutional cost savings. Our findings, especially considering the high rates of KF in Mexico, suggest a pressing need for interventions that can reduce healthcare costs at the beginning of renal replacement therapy.

Asunto(s)

Hospitalización , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , México , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal/economía , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/economía , Hemodiálisis en el Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía

RESUMEN

Objective: To estimate the costs of antimicrobials in patients with surgical site infections (SSI). Method: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study with retrospective documentary analysis conducted at a tertiary public hospital with seven surgical rooms, averaging 750 surgeries per month.The micro-costing method used was the average direct cost of antibiotics, excluding intraoperative prophylactic antibiotics. Hospital infection investi-gation records were analyzed, and the study included records of patients diagnosed with confirmed surgical site infections (n=79) in 2021. Clinical data and direct costs of antimicrobials were examined. Results: The infection rate in this study was 6.76%. The specialties with the highest representation were digestive system and urological surgeries. Vancomycin was the most used antimicrobial, resulting in a total expenditure of R$ 7,345.68. Tigecycline incurred the highest total cost, amounting to R$ 79,655.52. Antimicrobials used to treat the 79 confirmed cases of SSIs totaled R$ 211,790.21 in costs. Conclusion: The average cost of antimicrobials per patient with SSI, considering total hospitalization days, was R$ 2,680.88, a significant component of total treatment costs. It is recommended to include cost analysis in the planning of hospital infection protocols. (AU)

---

Objetivo: Estimar los costos de los antimicrobianos en pacientes con infecciones del sitio quirúrgico (ISQ). Método: Este es un estudio descrip-tivo, transversal con análisis documental retrospectivo realizado en un hospital público terciario con siete salas quirúrgicas, con un promedio de 750 ciru-gías por mes. Se utilizó el método de microcosteo, calculando el costo directo promedio de los antibióticos, excluyendo los utilizados como profilaxis intraoperatoria. Se analizaron registros de investigación de infecciones hospitalarias, incluyendo pacientes diagnosticados con ISQ confirmadas (n=79) en 2021. Se examinaron datos clínicos y costos directos de los antimicrobianos. Resultados: La tasa de infección en este estudio fue del 6.76%. Las espe-cialidades con mayor representación fueron cirugías del sistema digestivo y urológicas. El antimicrobiano más utilizado fue la vancomicina, con un gasto total de R$ 7,345.68. Tigeciclina tuvo el costo total más alto, alcanzando R$ 79,655.52. Los antimicrobianos utilizados para tratar los 79 casos confirma-dos de ISQ sumaron R$ 211,790.21 en costos. Conclusión: El costo promedio de los antimicrobianos por paciente con ISQ, considerando los días totales de hospitalización, fue de R$ 2,680.88, un componente significativo de los costos totales de tratamiento. Se recomienda incluir análisis de costos en la planificación de protocolos de infección hospitalaria. (AU)

---

Objetivo: Estimar os custos com antimicrobianos em pacientes com infecções de sítio cirúrgico. Método: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, trans-versal, com análise documental retrospectiva, realizado em um hospital público terciário, com sete salas cirúrgicas, onde se realizam em média 750 cirur-gias mensais. O método de microcusteio utilizado foi o custo direto médio dos antibióticos, não sendo incluído antibiótico profilático no intraoperatório. Analisaram-se as fichas de investigação de infecção hospitalar e foram incluídas no estudo as fichas de pacientes que tiveram o diagnóstico de infecção de sítio cirúrgico confirmado (n=79) em 2021. Foram verificados os dados clínicos e apenas os custos diretos com os antimicrobianos. Resultados: A taxa dessas infecções neste estudo foi de 6,76%. As especialidades com maior representatividade foram cirurgias do aparelho digestivo e urológicas. O antimi-crobiano mais utilizado foi a Vancomicina, resultando no gasto total de R$ 7.345,68. O medicamento que gerou maior custo total foi a Tigeciclina, que representou R$ 79.655,52. Os antimicrobianos utilizados para tratar dos 79 casos confirmados de ISCs totalizaram o custo de R$ 211.790,21. Conclusão: A média de custo com antimicrobiano por paciente com ISC, no total de dias internados, foi de R$ 2.680,88, valor considerado representativo no custo total do tratamento. Recomenda-se a inclusão de análise de custos no planejamento de protocolos de infecção hospitalar. (AU)

Asunto(s)

Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Costos de Hospital , Sistemas de Costos en Instituciones de Salud

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT This is a cost analysis study based on hospital admissions, conducted from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), carried out in a cohort of patients hospitalized at the University Hospital of Brasília (UHB) due to Severe Acute Respiratory Infections (SARI) caused by COVID-19, from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022. An approach based on macro-costingwas used,considering thecosts perpatient identified in the Hospital Admission Authorizations (HAA). Were identified 1,015 HAA from 622 patients. The total cost of hospitalizations was R$ 2,875,867.18 for 2020 and 2021. Of this total, 86.41 % referred to hospital services and 13.59 % to professional services. The highest median cost per patient identified was for May 2020 (R$ 19,677.81 IQR [3,334.81-33,041.43]), while the lowest was in January 2021 (R$ 1,698.50 IQR [1,602.70-2,224.11]). The high cost of treating patients with COVID-19 resulted in a high economic burden of SARI due to COVID-19 for UHB and, consequently, for SUS.

RESUMEN

Objetivo: evaluar el desperdicio generado por el procesamiento de instrumental quirúrgico consignado en cirugías ortopédicas electivas y proponer un modelo para el cálculo del desperdicio asociado al procesamiento de instrumental quirúrgico consignado. Método: estudio de caso, cuantitativo, descriptivo-exploratorio, realizado en un hospital universitario grande, en dos fases: (1) retrospectiva, mediante la consulta de registros administrativos de cirugías ortopédicas electivas canceladas, con previsión de uso de materiales consignados, para identificar las subespecialidades con mayor demanda; y (2) prospectiva, por medio de observaciones directas, no participantes, del procesamiento de instrumental quirúrgico consignado preparado para las cirugías identificadas, y de la propuesta de un modelo para el cálculo del desperdicio asociado al procesamiento de estos materiales. Resultados: se identificaron las cirugías de artroplastia de cadera, artrodesis de columna y artroplastia de rodilla con mayor demanda, resultando en 854 cajas de instrumental quirúrgico consignado procesado y sin uso. El desperdicio del procesamiento se estimó en R$ 34.340,18 (US$ 6,359.30). Conclusión: la ecuación propuesta permitió calcular el desperdicio relacionado con la producción y la no utilización de cajas de instrumental quirúrgico consignado para procedimientos ortopédicos, y puede equipar a los enfermeros para la planificación basada en datos institucionales, asistenciales y financieros, con el objetivo de aprovechar mejor los recursos por medio de la identificación del desperdicio.

---

Objective: to evaluate the waste generated from processing surgical instruments consigned in elective orthopedic surgeries and propose a model for calculating waste associated with processing consigned surgical instruments. Method: a quantitative, descriptive-exploratory case study carried out in a large university hospital in two phases: (1) retrospective by consulting administrative records of canceled elective orthopedic surgeries, with provision for the use of consigned materials for identification of the sub-specializations with the greatest demand; and (2) prospective through direct, non-participant observations of processing consigned surgical instruments prepared for the identified surgeries and proposition of a model for calculating waste associated with processing these materials. Results: hip arthroplasty, spine arthrodesis and knee arthroplasty surgeries were identified as presenting the greatest demand, resulting in 854 boxes of consigned surgical instruments processed and unused. Processing waste was estimated at R$34,340.18 (US$6,359.30). Conclusion: the proposed equation made it possible to calculate the waste related to the production and non-use of boxes of surgical instruments consigned for orthopedic procedures and can equip nurses for planning based on institutional, care and financial data, aiming to make better use of resources through waste identification.

---

Objetivo: avaliar o desperdício gerado pelo processamento de instrumentais cirúrgicos consignados em cirurgias ortopédicas eletivas e propor um modelo de cálculo de desperdício associado ao processamento de instrumentais cirúrgicos consignados. Método: estudo quantitativo, descritivo-exploratório, do tipo estudo de caso, realizado em hospital universitário de grande porte, em duas fases: (1) retrospectiva pela consulta aos registros administrativos de cirurgias ortopédicas eletivas canceladas, com previsão de uso de materiais consignados para identificação das subespecialidades com maior demanda e (2) prospectiva por meio de observações diretas, não participantes, do processamento de instrumentais cirúrgicos consignados preparados para as cirurgias identificadas e proposição de modelo de cálculo de desperdício associado ao processamento desses materiais. Resultados: foram identificadas as cirurgias de artroplastia de quadril, artrodese de coluna e artroplastia de joelho, com maior demanda, resultando em 854 caixas de instrumentais cirúrgicos consignados processados e não utilizados. O desperdício do processamento foi estimado em R$ 34.340,18 (US$ 6,359.30). Conclusão: a equação proposta permitiu calcular o desperdício relacionado à produção e não utilização de caixas de instrumentais cirúrgicos consignados para procedimentos ortopédicos e pode instrumentalizar os enfermeiros para o planejamento pautado em dados institucionais, assistenciais e financeiros, visando ao melhor aproveitamento dos recursos através da identificação do desperdício.

Asunto(s)

Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/provisión & distribución , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

Objetivo: analisar os custos operacionais de um pronto-socorro relacionados ao atendimento de pacientes COVID-19 em 2020 e 2021. Método: estudo transversal, descritivo de abordagem quantitativa. A mensuração dos custos utilizou-se da perspectiva do gestor hospitalar, por meio de microcusteio por absorção. Custos diretos, indiretos e variáveis, foram avaliados de cima para baixo (top-down). Resultados: o perfil predominante foi de homens, com idades entre 61 e 70 anos, casados, brancos e moradores de Londrina (Paraná, Brasil). O tempo médio de internação para pacientes graves foi 12,20 dias e, para os demais, 8,38 dias. O desfecho principal foi a alta hospitalar. Os custos operacionais em 2020 foram de R$28.461.152,87, já em 2021 os valores encontrados foram R$43.749.324,61. O custo médio do paciente-dia foi de R$2.614,45 em 2020 para R$3.351,93 em 2021. Conclusão: verificou-se aumento dos custos no período estudado. Conhecer os custos operacionais do pronto-socorro, possibilita o planejamento financeiro institucional contribuindo para qualificar a tomada de decisões gerenciais(AU)

---

Objective: to analyze the operating costs of an emergency room related to the care of COVID-19 patients in 2020 and 2021. Method: cross-sectional, descriptive study with a quantitative approach. The measurement of costs was used from the perspective of the hospital manager, through absorption micro-costing. Direct, indirect and variable costs were evaluated from top to bottom (top-down). Results: the predominant profile was men, aged between 61 and 70 years, married, white and living in Londrina (Paraná, Brazil). The mean length of stay for critically ill patients was 12.20 days and for the others, 8.38 days. The main outcome was hospital discharge. Operating costs in 2020 were BRL 28,461,152.87, while in 2021 the values found were BRL 43,749,324.61. The average patient-day cost went from R$2,614.45 in 2020 to R$3,351.93 in 2021. Conclusion: costs increased in the study period. Be aware of the operational costs of emergency room, enablement or institutional financial planning, contributing to qualify management decision-making(AU)

---

Objetivo: analizar los costos operativos de un servicio de urgencias relacionado con la atención de pacientes con COVID-19 en los años 2020 y 2021. Método: estudio descriptivo transversal con enfoque cuantitativo. Se utilizó la medición de costos desde la perspectiva del gestor del hospital, a través del microcosteo por absorción. Los costos directos, indirectos y variables se evaluaron de arriba hacia abajo (top-down). Resultados: el perfil predominante fue el de hombres, con edad entre 61 y 70 años, casados, blancos y residentes en Londrina (Paraná, Brasil). La estancia media de internación de los pacientes críticos fue de 12,20 días y, de los demás, de 8,38 días. El resultado principal fue el alta hospitalaria. Los costos operacionales en 2020 fueron de R$ 28.461.152,87, mientras que en 2021 los valores encontrados fueron de R$ 43.749.324,61. Los costos medios del paciente/día aumentaron de R$2.614,45 en 2020 a R$3.351,93 en 2021. Conclusión: se observó un aumento de los costos en el periodo estudiado. Conocer los costos operativos de un servicio de urgencias posibilita la planificación financiera institucional, contribuyendo a calificar la toma de decisiones gerenciales(AU)

Asunto(s)

Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/organización & administración , Costos y Análisis de Costo/economía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Estudios Transversales , COVID-19 , Análisis de Documentos

RESUMEN

Objectives: To describe the regional distribution of hospital admission authorizations (HAA), hospitalization costs (HC), the average length of stay (LOS), and mortality rates (MR) related to primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) funded by the Brazilian Health Unic System (SUS) from 2012 to 2021. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study using secondary data of public domain obtained from the Department of Informatics of SUS (DATASUS) database website. Results: A total of 125,463 HAA were released with HC of 552,218,181.04 BRL in the evaluated period. The average LOS was of 6.8 days. MR was 1.62%. Conclusion: The regional distribution of HAA was 65,756 (52%) in the Southeast; 33,837 (27%) in the South; 14,882 (12%) in the Northeast; 9,364 (8%) in Midwest; and 1,624 (1%) in North - in 2020 there was a sharp decrease of the released HAA, probably due to the COVID-19 pandemic. HC was 293,474,673.20 BRL in the Southeast; 144,794,843.11 BRL in the South; 61,751,644.36 BRL in the Northeast; 45,724,353.80 BRL in the Midwest; and 6,472,666.57 BRL in the North. The average LOS was 6.7 in the Southeast; 5.3 in the South; 9.2 in the Northeast; 7.6 in the Midwest; and, 13.6 in the North. MR was as follows: Southeast=1.88%; South=1.07%; Northeast=1.83%; Midwest=1.44%; and North=1.47%. Evidence Level III; Retrospective Comparative Study .

---

Objetivos: Descrever a distribuição regional das autorizações de internação hospitalar (AIH), custos de internação (CI), tempo médio de permanência (TMP) e taxa de mortalidade (TM) relacionados às artroplastias totais de quadril (ATQ) primárias financiadas pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) de 2012 a 2021. Métodos: Estudo transversal descritivo utilizando dados secundários de domínio público obtidos no site do banco de dados do Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS). Resultados: Foram liberadas 125.463 AIH com CI de R$ 552.218.181,04 no período avaliado. O TMP foi de 6,8 dias. A TM foi de 1,62%. Conclusões: A distribuição regional de AIH foi de 65.756 (52%) no Sudeste; 33.837 (27%) no Sul; 14.882 (12%) no Nordeste; 9.364 (8%) no Centro-Oeste; e, 1.624 (1%) no Norte - em 2020 houve queda acentuada das AIH liberadas, provavelmente devido à pandemia COVID-19. Os CI foram de R$ 293.474.673,20 no Sudeste; R$ 144.794.843,11 no Sul; R$ 61.751.644,36 no Nordeste; R$ 45.724.353,80 no Centro-Oeste; e R$ 6.472.666,57 no Norte. O TMP foi de 6,7 no Sudeste; 5,3 no Sul; 9,2 no Nordeste; 7,6 no Centro-Oeste; e 13,6 no Norte. A TM foi como se segue: Sudeste=1,88%; Sul=1,07%; Nordeste=1,83%; Centro-Oeste=1,44%; e, Norte=1,47%. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo Retrospectivo Comparativo .

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed significant burden on Brazil's health system. This study aimed to examine clinical characteristics, overall vaccine uptake, and to assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with acute COVID-19 in Brazil during the Omicron predominant period. METHODS: A nationwide retrospective study was conducted using various Brazilian databases including, COVID-19 related databases, public health systems, and other surveillance/demographic datasets. Individuals with positive COVID-19 test results between January 1 2022 and April 30 2022, during Omicron BA.1/BA.2 wave, were identified. Patients' demographics, vaccine uptake, HCRU and corresponding costs were described by age groups. RESULTS: A total of 8,160,715 (3.80%) COVID-19 cases were identified in the study cohort, ranging from 2.43% in <5 years to 62.05% in 19-49 years. The uptake of partial (Dose 1) or full immunization (Dose 2) was less than 0.1% in children aged <5 years, whereas in individuals ≥ 19 years, it exceeded 89.78% for Dose 1 and 84.07% for Dose 2. Overall booster vaccine uptake was 38.06%, which was significantly higher among individuals aged ≥ 65 years, surpassing 74.79%. Regardless of vaccination status, 87.2% cases were symptomatic, and 1.48% were hospitalized due to acute COVID-19 (<5 years: 2.33%, 5-11 years: 0.99%, 12-18 years: 0.32%, 19-49 years: 0.40%; 50-64 years: 1.50%, 65-74 years: 5.43%, and ≥ 75 years: 17.89%). Among the hospitalized patients (n = 120,450), 32.57% were admitted to ICU, of whom 31,283 (79.75%) individuals required mechanical ventilation (MV) support. The average cost per day in normal ward and ICU without MV in public/general hospital settings was $104.36 and $302.81, respectively. While average cost per day in normal ward and ICU with MV was $75.91 and $301.22 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified the burden of COVID-19 in Brazil, suggesting substantial healthcare resources required to manage the COVID-19 pandemic.

Asunto(s)

COVID-19 , Vacunas , Niño , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

The number of patients with cancer requiring intensive care unit admission is increasing around the world. The improvement in the pathophysiological understanding of this group of patients, as well as the increasingly better and more targeted treatment options for their underlying disease, has led to a significant increase in their survival over the past three decades. Within the organizational concepts, it is necessary to know what adds value in the care of critical oncohematological patients. Practices in medicine that do not benefit patients and possibly cause harm are called low-value practices, while high-value practices are defined as high-quality care at relatively low cost. In this article, we discuss ten domains with high-value evidence in the care of cancer patients: (1) intensive care unit admission policies; (2) intensive care unit organization; (3) etiological investigation of hypoxemia; (4) management of acute respiratory failure; (5) management of febrile neutropenia; (6) urgent chemotherapy treatment in critically ill patients; (7) patient and family experience; (8) palliative care; (9) care of intensive care unit staff; and (10) long-term impact of critical disease on the cancer population. The disclosure of such policies is expected to have the potential to change health care standards. We understand that it is a lengthy process, and initiatives such as this paper are one of the first steps in raising awareness and beginning a discussion about high-value care in various health scenarios.

Asunto(s)

Enfermedad Crítica , Enfermería de Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Humanos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Revelación , Impulso (Psicología) , Hospitalización

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Research addressing the costs of Medication errors (MEs) is still scarce despite issues related to patient safety having significant economic and health impacts, making it imperative to analyze the costs and adverse events related to MEs for a better patient, professional, and institutional safety. AIM: To identify the number of medication errors and verify whether this number was associated with increased hospitalization costs for patients in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). METHOD: This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study evaluated secondary data from patients' electronic medical records to compile variables, create a model, and survey hospitalization costs. The statistical analysis included calculating medication error rates, descriptive analysis, and simple and multivariate regression. RESULTS: The omission error rate showed the highest number of errors per drug dose (59.8%) and total errors observed in the sample (55.31%), followed by the time error rate (26.97%; 24.95%). The omission error had the highest average when analyzing the entire hospitalization (170.40) and day of hospitalization (13.79). Hospitalization costs were significantly and positively correlated with scheduling errors, with an increase of BRL 121.92 (about USD $25.00) (95% CI 43.09; 200.74), and to prescription errors, with an increase of BRL 63.51 (about USD $3.00) (95% CI 29.93; 97.09). CONCLUSION: We observed an association between two types of medication errors and increased hospitalization costs in an adult ICU (scheduling and prescription errors).

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The severity and transmissibility of COVID-19 justifies the need to identify the factors associated with its cost of illness (CoI). This study aimed to identify CoI, cost predictors, and cost drivers in the management of patients with COVID-19 from hospital and Brazil's Public Health System (SUS) perspectives. METHODS: This is a multicenter study that evaluated the CoI in patients diagnosed of COVID-19 who reached hospital discharge or died before being discharged between March and September 2020. Sociodemographic, clinical, and hospitalization data were collected to characterize and identify predictors of costs per patients and cost drivers per admission. RESULTS: A total of 1084 patients were included in the study. For hospital perspective, being overweight or obese, being between 65 and 74 years old, or being male showed an increased cost of 58.4%, 42.9%, and 42.5%, respectively. From SUS perspective, the same predictors of cost per patient increase were identified. The median cost per admission was estimated at US$359.78 and US$1385.80 for the SUS and hospital perspectives, respectively. In addition, patients who stayed between 1 and 4 days in the intensive care unit (ICU) had 60.9% higher costs than non-ICU patients; these costs significantly increased with the length of stay (LoS). The main cost driver was the ICU-LoS and COVID-19 ICU daily for hospital and SUS perspectives, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The predictors of increased cost per patient at admission identified were overweight or obesity, advanced age, and male sex, and the main cost driver identified was the ICU-LoS. Time-driven activity-based costing studies, considering outpatient, inpatient, and long COVID-19, are needed to optimize our understanding about cost of COVID-19.

Asunto(s)

COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Brasil/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Sobrepeso , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Hospitales Públicos , Costo de Enfermedad

RESUMEN

Introduction: the United Nations recognizes traffic accidents as a serious public health problem all over the world, because they are accompanied by a high morbidity and mortality rate. Traffic causes the death of approximately 1.3 million people and the disability of millions more.Objective: to evaluate mortality from traffic accidents among motorcyclists, pedestrians and hospital costs that occurred in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, from 1999 to 2019.Methods: this is a retrospective time series study with official micro data, collected by place of occurrence among motorcycle drivers, pedestrians and hospital costs from 1999 to 2019, in the city of São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Results: in the city of São Paulo, from 1999 to 2019, there were 144,186 thousand deaths resulting from land transport accidents, projecting 5,293 thousand deaths specifically with motorcyclists. Proportional mortality from was higher in the mean age group of 29 years, predominantly in males, with emphasis on white race/skin color. The costs per death stand out for motorcyclists with an average of R$: 49,078.18, with regard to deaths by sex, male predominated in relation to female.Conclusion: there was a high death rate, both in motorcyclists and pedestrians, with the latter having a higher average. Thus, these findings provide relevant information on the magnitude of the public health problem to guide us on control strategies for these causes.

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT The number of patients with cancer requiring intensive care unit admission is increasing around the world. The improvement in the pathophysiological understanding of this group of patients, as well as the increasingly better and more targeted treatment options for their underlying disease, has led to a significant increase in their survival over the past three decades. Within the organizational concepts, it is necessary to know what adds value in the care of critical oncohematological patients. Practices in medicine that do not benefit patients and possibly cause harm are called low-value practices, while high-value practices are defined as high-quality care at relatively low cost. In this article, we discuss ten domains with high-value evidence in the care of cancer patients: (1) intensive care unit admission policies; (2) intensive care unit organization; (3) etiological investigation of hypoxemia; (4) management of acute respiratory failure; (5) management of febrile neutropenia; (6) urgent chemotherapy treatment in critically ill patients; (7) patient and family experience; (8) palliative care; (9) care of intensive care unit staff; and (10) long-term impact of critical disease on the cancer population. The disclosure of such policies is expected to have the potential to change health care standards. We understand that it is a lengthy process, and initiatives such as this paper are one of the first steps in raising awareness and beginning a discussion about high-value care in various health scenarios.

---

RESUMO O número de pacientes oncológicos com necessidade de internação em unidades de terapia intensiva está aumentando em todo o mundo. A maior compreensão fisiopatológica desse grupo de pacientes, bem como opções de tratamento cada vez melhores e mais direcionadas à doença subjacente, tem levado a um aumento significativo da sobrevida nas últimas três décadas. Dentro dos conceitos organizacionais é necessário saber o que agrega valor ao cuidado de pacientes onco-hematológicos graves. As práticas terapêuticas não benéficas aos pacientes e possivelmente causadoras de danos são chamadas práticas de baixo valor, enquanto as práticas de alto valor são definidas como cuidados de alta qualidade a um custo relativamente baixo. Neste artigo discutimos dez domínios com evidências de alto valor no cuidado de pacientes com câncer: (1) políticas de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva; (2) organização da unidade de terapia intensiva; (3) investigação etiológica da hipoxemia; (4) manejo da insuficiência respiratória aguda; (5) manejo da neutropenia febril; (6) tratamento quimioterápico de urgência em pacientes graves; (7) experiência do paciente e da família; (8) cuidados paliativos; (9) cuidados com a equipe da unidade de terapia intensiva; e (10) impacto a longo prazo da doença grave na população oncológica. Esperase que a divulgação dessas políticas traga mudanças aos padrões atuais do cuidado em saúde. Entendemos que é um processo longo, e iniciativas como o presente artigo são um dos primeiros passos para aumentar a conscientização e possibilitar discussão sobre cuidados de alto valor em vários cenários de saúde.

RESUMEN

Background: An estimated 9.6 million people died from cancer globally in 2018, which is a reflection of the quality of patients' end-of-life care and its costs. Aim: To estimate direct medical costs of the last 30 days of oncology patients admitted to an inpatient clinic and to evaluate factors associated with medical costs at the end of life. Design: Cost-of-illness study with data from a retrospective cohort. Setting/Participants: We included patients aged 18 and older who were diagnosed with incurable cancer and who were admitted to a tertiary hospital in Brazil between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. Results: Our sample included 109 patients with an average age of 69 (61‒76). The median overall survival was 4.3 (.9‒12.9) months. The median cost per patient per day related to hospitalization was BRL 119 (73‒181)/United States dollars [USD] 21 (13‒33). The cost of medication was BRL 66 (40‒105)/USD 12 (7‒19), representing 55.46% of costs while that of materials and supplies was BRL 30 (18‒49)/USD 5 (3‒9). In the multivariate analysis, when the limitation of interventions was recorded in the medical record, the median cost is reduced by BRL 50 (USD 9) per patient per day. Conclusions: The median cost per patient per day was BRL 119 (73‒181). The recording of limitations of therapeutic interventions in the medical record was a predictor variable that influenced the final medical cost of patients, suggesting that medical practice and decision-making in end-of-life care impact costs.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Neoplasias/terapia , Hospitalización , Pacientes Internos , Costos de la Atención en Salud

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objectives: To describe the regional distribution of hospital admission authorizations (HAA), hospitalization costs (HC), the average length of stay (LOS), and mortality rates (MR) related to primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) funded by the Brazilian Health Unic System (SUS) from 2012 to 2021. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study using secondary data of public domain obtained from the Department of Informatics of SUS (DATASUS) database website. Results: A total of 125,463 HAA were released with HC of 552,218,181.04 BRL in the evaluated period. The average LOS was of 6.8 days. MR was 1.62%. Conclusion: The regional distribution of HAA was 65,756 (52%) in the Southeast; 33,837 (27%) in the South; 14,882 (12%) in the Northeast; 9,364 (8%) in Midwest; and 1,624 (1%) in North - in 2020 there was a sharp decrease of the released HAA, probably due to the COVID-19 pandemic. HC was 293,474,673.20 BRL in the Southeast; 144,794,843.11 BRL in the South; 61,751,644.36 BRL in the Northeast; 45,724,353.80 BRL in the Midwest; and 6,472,666.57 BRL in the North. The average LOS was 6.7 in the Southeast; 5.3 in the South; 9.2 in the Northeast; 7.6 in the Midwest; and, 13.6 in the North. MR was as follows: Southeast=1.88%; South=1.07%; Northeast=1.83%; Midwest=1.44%; and North=1.47%. Evidence Level III; Retrospective Comparative Study .

---

RESUMO Objetivos: Descrever a distribuição regional das autorizações de internação hospitalar (AIH), custos de internação (CI), tempo médio de permanência (TMP) e taxa de mortalidade (TM) relacionados às artroplastias totais de quadril (ATQ) primárias financiadas pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) de 2012 a 2021. Métodos: Estudo transversal descritivo utilizando dados secundários de domínio público obtidos no site do banco de dados do Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS). Resultados: Foram liberadas 125.463 AIH com CI de R$ 552.218.181,04 no período avaliado. O TMP foi de 6,8 dias. A TM foi de 1,62%. Conclusões: A distribuição regional de AIH foi de 65.756 (52%) no Sudeste; 33.837 (27%) no Sul; 14.882 (12%) no Nordeste; 9.364 (8%) no Centro-Oeste; e, 1.624 (1%) no Norte - em 2020 houve queda acentuada das AIH liberadas, provavelmente devido à pandemia COVID-19. Os CI foram de R$ 293.474.673,20 no Sudeste; R$ 144.794.843,11 no Sul; R$ 61.751.644,36 no Nordeste; R$ 45.724.353,80 no Centro-Oeste; e R$ 6.472.666,57 no Norte. O TMP foi de 6,7 no Sudeste; 5,3 no Sul; 9,2 no Nordeste; 7,6 no Centro-Oeste; e 13,6 no Norte. A TM foi como se segue: Sudeste=1,88%; Sul=1,07%; Nordeste=1,83%; Centro-Oeste=1,44%; e, Norte=1,47%. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo Retrospectivo Comparativo .

RESUMEN

Objetivo: avaliar a opinião dos profissionais de saúde sobre o desperdício, em uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Método: o método utilizado foi o qualitativo. Foi realizada uma entrevista com 66 profissionais de uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva e analisados pelo método de Bardin. Resultados: através dos discursos obtidos em cada quadro, foram identificadas e destacadas as unidades de registro que permitiram a criação de dois quadros, o primeiro possibilitou a construção da categoria que denominada "Gestão de custos em saúde: o desperdício de materiais em UTI". Já o quadro 2, possibilitou a obtenção de duas categorias, "Capacitação profissional em saúde: a otimização da gestão de custos em UTI" e "a inserção do processo de gestão de custos em UTI". Conclusão: o primeiro passo para o combate ao desperdício é conhecer a realidade institucional. Os gestores necessitam estudar os percentuais e fontes de desperdício de seu serviço e o impacto desses nos custos

---

Objective: to evaluate the opinion of health professionals about waste in an Intensive Care Unit. Method: the method used was qualitative. An interview was conducted with 66 professionals from an Intensive Care Unit and analyzed by the Bandin method. Results: through the speeches obtained in each table, were identified and highlighted the units that allowed the creation of two tables, the first made it possible to construct the category called "Health cost management: the waste of materials in ICU". Table 2, on the other hand, made it possible to obtain two categories, "Professional training in health: the optimization of ICU cost management" and "the insertion of the ICU cost management process". Conclusion: the first step in the fight against waste is to know the institutional reality. Managers need to study the percentages and sources of their service waste and their impact on costs

---

Objetivo: evaluar la opinión de los profesionales de la salud sobre los desechos en una unidad de cuidados intensivos. Método: el método utilizado fue cualitativo. Se realizó una entrevista con 66 profesionales de una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos y se analizó mediante el método Bandin. Resultados: através de los discursos obtenidos en cada tabla, se identificaron y destacaron las unidades de registro que permitieron la creación de dos tablas, la primera permitió construir la categoría denominada "Gestión de costos de salud: el desperdicio de materiales en la UCI". La Tabla 2, por otro lado, permitió obtener dos categorías, "Capacitación profesional en salud: la optimización de la gestión de costos de la UCI" y "la inserción del proceso de gestión de costos de la UCI". Conclusión: el primer paso en la lucha contra el desperdicio es conocer la realidad institucional. Los gerentes deben estudiar los porcentajes y las fuentes de desperdicio de sus servicios y su impacto en los costos

Asunto(s)

Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Organización y Administración , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Recursos Materiales en Salud , Costos de Hospital , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos