RESUMEN

Background: This study aimed to evaluate bone union of the tibial tuberosity in patients undergoing medial opening wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (OWDTO). It was hypothesized that bone union of the tibial tuberosity could be associated with lateral hinge fractures (LHFs), but not thickness of the tibial tuberosity osteotomy. Methods: Data of 61 consecutive patients who underwent OWDTO were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic parameters of the lower limb and LHFs were evaluated. Thickness of the tibial tuberosity osteotomy and bone union of the tibial tuberosity were assessed at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm distal to the most proximal part of the tibial tuberosity on computed tomography. Bone union was assessed. Factors related to bone union of the tibial tuberosity were analyzed. Results: There were 13 postoperative onset LHFs: all healed with conservative treatments within 6 months after surgery. The total score of bone union of the tibial tuberosity was 8.4 ± 2.1 points, which correlated with age, postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), correction angle, and postoperative onset LHF (r = 0.307, 0.388, 0.275, and -0.624, respectively; p = 0.016, 0.002, 0.033, and <0.001, respectively). Regression coefficient for postoperative onset LHF, postoperative MPTA, and body mass index were -0.619 (p < 0.001), 0.285 (p = 0.003), and -0.227 (p = 0.021), respectively. Conclusion: Postoperative onset LHFs, but not thickness of the tibial tuberosity osteotomy, were a risk factor for delayed union of the tibial tuberosity following OWDTO. Furthermore, to prevent delayed union of the tibial tuberosity, postoperative onset LHFs should be prevented. Level of evidence: LEVEL III, Case-control study.

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate the influence of lateral hinge fracture (LHF) on the early effectiveness of supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) and to explore the related risk factors for LHF. Methods: A total of 39 patients (39 feet) with varus-type ankle osteoarthritis treated with SMO between January 2016 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 10 males and 29 females, aged from 41 to 71 years (mean, 57.7 years). According to Takakura stage, there were 6 feet in stage Ⅱ, 19 feet in stage Ⅲa, and 14 feet in stage Ⅲb. The LHF was recognized by the immediate postoperative X-ray film. The osteotomy healing time and the changes of pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), tibial lateral surface angle (TLS), and tibiotalar angle (TT) before and after operation were compared between patients with and without LHF. The age, gender, affected side, body mass index, Takakura stage, preoperative VAS score, preoperative AOFAS score, preoperative TAS, preoperative TLS, preoperative TT, SMO correction angle, osteotomy distraction, distance from medial osteotomy to ankle joint line (MD), and distance from lateral osteotomy to ankle joint line (LD) were compared between with and without LHF patients, and further logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors of LHF during SMO. Results: All patients were followed up 12-54 months (mean, 27.1 months). During operation, 13 feet developed LHF (group A) and 26 feet did not develop LHF (group B). X-ray film reexamination showed that 1 patient in group A complicated with tibial articular surface cleft fracture had delayed osteotomy and healed successfully after plaster fixation; the osteotomy of other patients healed, and there was no significant difference in healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, there were significant differences in VAS score, AOFAS score, TAS, TLS, and TT of the two groups when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the changes of above indicators before and after operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The differences in SMO correction angle, osteotomy distraction, and LD between with and without LHF patients were significant ( P<0.05), and further logistic regression analysis showed that excessive LD was the risk factor of LHF during SMO ( P<0.05). Conclusion: Too high or too low lateral hinge position during SMO may lead to LHF, but as long as appropriate treatment and rehabilitation measurements are taken, the early effectiveness is similar to that of patients without LHF.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: The optimal hinge position to prevent hinge fractures in medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) based on the biomechanical background has not yet been well examined. This study aimed to examine the appropriate hinge position in MCWDFO using finite element (FE) analysis to prevent hinge fractures. Methods: Computer-aided design (CAD) models were created using composite replicate femurs. FE models of the MCWDFO with a 5° wedge were created with three different hinge positions: (A) 5 mm proximal to the proximal margin of the lateral epicondylar region, (B) proximal margin level and (C) 5 mm distal to the proximal margin level. The maximum and minimum principal strains in the cortical bone were calculated for each model. To validate the FE analysis, biomechanical tests were performed using composite replicate femurs with the same hinge position models as those in the FE analysis. Results: In the FE analysis, the maximum principal strains were in the order of Models A > B > C. The highest value of maximum principal strain was observed in the area proximal to the hinge. In the biomechanical test, hinge fractures occurred in the area proximal to the hinge in Models A and B, whereas the gap closed completely without hinge fractures in Model C. Fractures occurred in an area similar to where the highest maximal principal strain was observed in the FE analysis. Conclusion: Distal to the proximal margin of the lateral epicondylar region is an appropriate hinge position in MCWDFO to prevent hinge fractures. Level of Evidence: Level V.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Medial closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) is a valuable treatment approach for lateral knee osteoarthritis with femoral valgus deformity. Improved results have been reported with the upgrade of surgical techniques and locking plates. However, the risk of nonunion and loss of correction increases in cases of lateral hinge fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical impact of hinge fractures and support instruments in MCWDFO using finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five femur models were developed using Mechanical Finder 11.0 FEA software. We simulated the following models: only a medial locking plate (MLP) (group A); an MLP with a lateral support screw (group B); and an MLP with a lateral support plate (group C). The equivalent stress around the hinge was evaluated and the percentage of the plastic deformation zone was calculated for the hinge area in the no-hinge fracture model. The equivalent stress of the MLP and the degree of displacement were calculated using the hinge fracture model. RESULTS: The percentages of the plastic deformation zone in groups A, B, and C were 18.0 ± 11.7%, 3.3 ± 2.4%, and 2.3 ± 2.8%, respectively. The percentages tended to be lower in groups B and C than in group A. In the hinge fracture model, the mean equivalent stress of the MLP in group C was significantly less than that in group A. In terms of the mean degree of displacement, group A showed more than 1 mm of displacement, which was significantly larger than that of the other groups. CONCLUSION: The support instruments provided stability to the hinge site and reduced the equivalent stress of the main plate in the MCWDFO with hinge fractures. No significant difference was observed between the two instruments in terms of stability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although the effects of lateral hinge fractures (LHF) on bone union and clinical outcomes after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) have been established, the effects of LHF after opening-wedge distal tibial tubercle osteotomy (OWDTO) are unclear. We hypothesised that LHF after OWDTO would be associated with delayed bone union and result in poorer clinical outcomes than expected for LHF after OWHTO. METHODS: This study enrolled 100 patients, with 50 OWDTO patients (18 men; mean age, 63.2 years) and 50 OWHTO patients compared based on the propensity score matched analysis. The effect of LHF on bone union was compared between the groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at the mean follow-up of 28 months. RESULTS: There was no between-group difference in the incidence rate of LHF. However, the rate of bone union at the anterior flange in the presence of an LHF was significantly lower in the OWDTO (26%) than in the OWHTO (80%) 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.05), but no difference was observed 12 months postoperatively. The Lysholm score was significantly lower for patients with LHF following OWDTO than for OWDTO patients without LHF or OWHTO patients with/without LHF 3 and 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001); Lysholm score and KOOS were not different at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: LHF after OWDTO was associated with delayed bone union and poor clinical outcomes until 12 months. This information can guide decisions regarding the indications and the management of patients after OWDTO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hinge fractures are considered risk factors for delayed or nonunion of the osteotomy gap in distal femoral osteotomies (DFOs). Limited evidence exists regarding the treatment of hinge fractures after DFO, which could improve stability and thus bone healing. PURPOSE: To (1) examine the effect of hinge fractures on the biomechanical properties of the bone-implant construct, (2) evaluate the biomechanical advantages of an additional fixation of a hinge fracture, and (3) test the biomechanical properties of different types of varisation DFOs. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 32 fresh-frozen human distal femora equally underwent medial closing wedge DFO or lateral opening wedge DFO using a unilateral locking compression plate. The following conditions were serially tested: (1) preserved hinge; (2) hinge fracture along the osteotomy plane; (3) screw fixation of the hinge fracture; and (4) locking T-plate fixation of the hinge fracture. Using a servo-hydraulic materials testing machine, we subjected each construct to 15 cycles of axial compression (400 N; 20 N/s) and internal and external rotational loads (10 N·m; 0.5 N·m/s) to evaluate the stiffness. The axial and torsional hinge displacement was recorded using a 3-dimensional optical measuring system. Repeated-measures 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni correction were used for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Independent from the type of osteotomy, a fractured hinge significantly (P < .001) increased rotational displacement and reduced stiffness of the bone-implant construct, resulting in ≥1.92 mm increased displacement and ≥70% reduced stiffness in each rotational direction, while the axial stiffness remained unchanged. For both procedures, neither a screw nor a plate could restore intact rotational stiffness (P < .01), while only the plate was able to restore intact rotational displacement. However, the plate always performed better compared with the screw, with significantly higher and lower values for stiffness (+38% to +53%; P < .05) and displacement (-55% to -72%; P < .01), respectively, in ≥1 rotational direction. At the same time, the type of osteotomy did not significantly affect axial and torsional stability. CONCLUSION: Hinge fractures after medial closing wedge DFO and lateral opening wedge DFO caused decreased bone-implant construct rotational stiffness and increased fracture-site displacement. In contrast, the axial stiffness remained unchanged in the cadaveric model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When considering an osteosynthesis of a hinge fracture in a DFO, an additional plate fixation was the construct with the highest stiffness and least displacement, which could restore intact hinge rotational displacement.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were (1) to compare the incidence of lateral hinge fractures (LHFs) in medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and medial opening-wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (DTO), and (2) to investigate the risk factors for LHFs. The incidence of LHFs was hypothesized to be higher in the DTO group than the OWHTO group. The DTO procedure is also a risk factor for LHFs. METHODS: A total of 167 knees that underwent OWHTO (n = 65) and DTO (n = 102) were subjected to propensity score matching for the comparison of the groups. The matched variables were sex, preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, and preoperative medial proximal tibial angle. Forty-one matched pairs were enrolled for comparative analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for LHFs. RESULTS: The incidence of LHFs was not significantly different between the groups (34.1% vs. 26.8%, respectively; p = 0.631). Logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio: 1.074, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.020-1.131, p = 0.007), BMI (odds ratio: 1.150, 95% CI: 1.049-1.260, p = 0.003), and preoperative HKA angle (odds ratio: 1.150, 95% CI: 1.049-1.260, p = 0.035) were significant risk factors for LHFs. The difference in surgical technique between OWHTO and DTO was not a risk factor for LHFs (p = 0.204). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LHFs is similar in DTOs and OWHTOs, and the DTO procedure is not a risk factor for LHFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the association between the hinge position, fibular head position, and type III lateral hinge fracture (LHF) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients who underwent MOWHTO. Radiographically, the Kellgren-Lawrence (K/L) classification, distance between the articular surface and the tip of the fibular head (fibular head position), hinge point (hinge position), type of LHF, and safe zone (within the proximal tibiofibular joint) outlier were evaluated. To determine the cut-off value of the hinge position and fibular head position associated with type III LHF, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated from the obtained cut-off values using logistic regression, which was adjusted by age, gender, body mass index, and opening distance. RESULTS: Among 132 knees in 120 patients, the radiographic severity of knee OA was 19 (14%), 73 (55%), and 40 (30%) of K/L grades 2, 3, and 4, respectively. LHF was observed in 40 knees (30%), including types I, II, and III fractures in 21 (16%), 5 (4%), and 14 (11%) knees, respectively. Hinge and fibular head positions were 16 and 10 mm, respectively, with significant correlation. Safe zone outlier was observed in 38 knees (29%). The hinge and fibular head positions with type III LHF were significantly higher (more cranial) than those with no fracture or other LHF subtypes. The ROC curve revealed that the cut-off value for the hinge and fibular head positions was 13.3 and 8.6 mm, respectively. The OR of the hinge and fibular head positions was 22.42 and 13.86, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A higher hinge position was a risk factor for type III LHF and was associated with a higher fibular head in patients with knee OA who underwent MOWHTO. The hinge position should be placed at a certain distance from the articular surface to avoid type III LHF, especially in participants with higher fibular head position, even if the hinge position is located in the safe zone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

RESUMEN

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the biomechanical significance of supplemental fixation using a positional screw in prevention of the hinge fracture in lateral closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCW-DFO) by means of a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Methods: The three-dimensional numerical knee models with LCW-DFO were developed. To assess the mechanical efficacy of the positional screw and determine its optimal position and orientation, in total, 13 screwing methods were analyzed. In the first four methods, the screw was supported by the cortical bone only on the medial surface (mono-cortical). In the other 9 models, the screw was supported by both medial and lateral cortical bones (bi-cortical). Under 1000 N of vertical force and 5 Nm of rotational torques, the highest shear stress value around the medial hinge area was adopted as an analytical parameter. Results: In mono-cortical methods, with the cancellous bone support, all methods were able to reduce the highest stress value compared to the value without the screw, while the efficacy was rather inferior when the screw was in horizontal direction. Without the cancellous bone support, however, all methods were not able to reduce the stress value. In bi-cortical methods, with the cancellous bone support, almost all screw augmentation methods were able to reduce the stress value. When screwing from the medial to the lateral, it only gets worse when going extremely posterior. Without the cancellous bone support, all methods were able to reduce the stress value. Conclusion: The mechanical efficacy of the bi-cortical method was proven regardless of the quality of the local cancellous bone.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Intraoperative hinge fractures in distal femur osteotomies represent a risk factor for loss of alignment and non-union. Using finite element analysis, the goal of this study was to investigate the influence of different hinge widths and osteotomy corrections on hinge fractures in medial closed-wedge and lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomies. METHODS: The hinge was located at the proximal margin of adductor tubercle for biplanar lateral open-wedge and at the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle for biplanar medial closed-wedge distal femur osteotomies, corresponding to optimal hinge positions described in literature. Different hinge widths (5, 7.5, 10 mm) were created and the osteotomy correction was opened/closed by 5, 7.5 and 10 mm. Tensile and compressive strain of the hinge was determined in a finite element analysis and compared to the ultimate strain of cortical bone to assess the hinge fracture risk. RESULTS: Doubling the correction from 5 to 10 mm increased mean tensile and compressive strain by 50% for lateral open-wedge and 48% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. A hinge width of 10 mm versus 5 mm showed increased strain in the hinge region of 61% for lateral open-wedge and 32% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. Medial closed-wedge recorded a higher fracture risk compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies due to a larger hinge cross-section area (60-67%) for all tested configurations. In case of a 5 mm hinge, medial closed-wedge recorded 71% higher strain in the hinge region compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies. CONCLUSION: Due to morphological features of the medial femoral condyle, finite element analysis suggests that lateral-open wedge osteotomies are the preferable option if larger corrections are intended, as a thicker hinge can remain without an increased hinge fracture risk.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of lateral hinge fractures (LHFs) during medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO) is unacceptably high, especially with distractions >10 mm. LHFs result in malunion, loss of correction, and recurrence of symptoms adversely affecting clinical outcomes. PURPOSE: (1) To investigate the incidence of LHF when a protective guide wire is utilized during MOW-HTO in small and large corrections and (2) to study the effect of correction size on early clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 96 knees that underwent MOW-HTO between 2019 and 2020. A protective wire applied intraoperatively across the lateral hinge point before opening wedge distraction was performed for all patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on opening wedge sizes: group A (opening distraction <10 mm) and group B (opening distraction ≥10 mm). LHF and wound complications were recorded. Prospective Knee Score and Function Score (Knee Society), Oxford Knee Score, and Physical and Mental Component Summaries of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire were recorded preoperatively and at 6 months and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Incidence of LHF was low in group A (n = 2; 6.1%) and group B (n = 3; 9.1%). A single case of intraoperative LHF was noted in each group, with each case resulting in a type 1 fracture. The incidence of postoperative fractures was comparable between groups (groups A vs B, n = 1 vs 2). At 6 months, clinical outcomes in group A were superior to those of group B (Knee Score, 85.7 ± 14.7 vs 73.1 ± 20.3, P = 0.028; Function Score, 73.5 ± 16.5 vs 63.1 ± 19.5, P = 0.047; Oxford Knee Score, 20.2 ± 4.7 vs 25.6 ± 8.5, P = 0.008; Physical Component Summary, 46.8 ± 8.1 vs 40.2 ± 10.9, P = 0.018). However, clinical outcomes were comparable at 2 years (P > .05). CONCLUSION: A protective wire was associated with a low incidence of LHF, even in larger MOW-HTO corrections. Large corrections had poorer clinical outcomes as compared with small corrections at 6 months. However, clinical outcomes between groups were comparable at 2 years.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO), sometimes the plate tends to be positioned anteromedially. The plate position can affect the length of the proximal screw, which significantly affects stability after osteotomy. Therefore, research on the correlation among plate position, screw length, and clinical outcomes is needed. METHODS: This retrospective review examines 196 knees in 175 patients who underwent MOWHTO from May 2012 to December 2018, for symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis with a varus alignment of > 5°. We evaluated the anteroposterior plate position, length of proximal screw, and postoperative computed tomography (CT). We reviewed patients' clinical outcome scores, presence of lateral hinge fracture, neurovascular complications, and infection. The correlation among proximal plate position, proximal screw length, and clinical outcomes was evaluated using Pearson's correlation analysis. A subgroup analysis by screw angle (> 48 ° or < 48 °) was also performed using chi-square test and Student t-test. RESULTS: The mean proximal plate position was 16.28% (range, 5.17-44.74) of the proximal tibia's anterior-to-posterior distance ratio, and the proximal screw length averaged 63.8 mm (range, 44-80 mm). Proximal posteromedial plate position and proximal screw length were significantly correlated (r2 = 0.667, P < .001), as were screw angle and length (r2 = 0.746, P < .001). Medial plating (< 48°) can use a longer proximal screw; nevertheless, no significant difference occurred in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Also, no differences occurred in complication rate, including hinge fracture. CONCLUSION: With more medially positioned plating during MOWHTO, we can use longer proximal screws. However, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes and the incidence of lateral hinge fractures regardless of plate position and screw length.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of lateral hinge fractures in medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) on bone union. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were followed-up for more than 1 year after MCWDFO. The incidence and type of hinge fracture, as well as the course of bone healing, were investigated. Slow healing was defined as bone union was not obtained until 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Hinge fractures were observed in 12 cases (57%). There were three types of hinge fractures. Type 1: the lateral cortex was completely cut through (4 cases), type 2: the osteotomy line was too proximal (6 cases), and type 3: the hinge point was significantly medial (2 cases). There was a significant difference in the mean correction angles between hinge fracture and no-fracture cases, with the mean angles being 13.8 ± 4.0° and 9.6 ± 3.1°, respectively. Sixty-seven percent (8/12) of cases with hinge fractures developed slow healing. Among the hinge fracture cases, when there was no displacement of the hinge fracture and good contact with the anterior flange, 40% (2/5) of cases developed slow healing. If there was displacement of the hinge or no contact of the anterior flange, 86% (6/7) of cases developed slow healing. In contrast, only 11% (1/9) of subjects who did not have a hinge fracture, developed slow healing. In 67% (6/9) of cases with slow healing, a correction loss of 2° or greater (average: 4.3 degrees valgus) was observed. There were no cases of non-union. Clinical outcomes at 1 year showed no significant difference between the groups with and without hinge fractures. CONCLUSIONS: There is a very high risk of hinge fracture in patients undergoing MCWDFO. Hinge fractures often lead to slow healing and a loss of correction. We recommend the endpoint of the distal lateral cortex of the femur as the ideal hinge point for the prevention of hinge fractures. Bone union is obtained slowly in even all hinge fracture cases without revision surgery. Consequently, surgical results are not affected by the occurrence of hinge fracture at 1 year.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to use the finite element method (FEM) to reproduce fracture lines that reach the lateral tibial plateau during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in patients with Type III lateral hinge fracture (LHF). It was hypothesized that the FEM could clarify biomechanical causes of Type III LHF, enabling prevention of adverse complications. METHODS: This study used the nonlinear FEM to analyze the data of eight knees in eight patients (two males and six females) with Type III LHF among 82 patients who underwent OWHTO, as well as the data of eight individuals with no LHF. To predict the onset of Type III LHF, simulation models were also developed in which posterior osteotomy sufficiency varied from 50% to perfect, the latter defined as osteotomy reaching the hinge point. RESULTS: Real-life instances of Type III LHF caused by insufficient posterior osteotomy were reproduced in all patient-specific FEM models, and these models accurately predicted fracture types and locations. During opening of the osteotomy gap, the fracture line reached the lateral tibial plateau, and extended vertically from the end of the insufficient posterior osteotomy, avoiding the rigid proximal tibiofibular joint. In contrast, sufficient posterior osteotomy resulted in a lack of LHF. Posterior osteotomy extension ≥ 70% of the width of the osteotomy plane was the cut-off value to prevent Type III LHF. CONCLUSION: Forced opening of insufficient posterior osteotomy was found to be a biomechanical cause of Type III LHF that extended perpendicularly to the lateral tibial plateau, avoiding the proximal tibiofibular joint. The clinical significance of this study is that sufficient posterior osteotomy during OWHTO, defined as at least 70% of the width of the osteotomy plane, can prevent Type III LHF.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Several methods have been developed to prevent lateral hinge fractures (LHFs), using only classic statistical models. Machine learning is under the spotlight because of its ability to analyze various weights and model nonlinear relationships. The purpose of this study was to create a machine learning model that predicts LHF with high predictive performance. METHODS: Data were collected from a total of 439 knees with medial osteoarthritis (OA) treated with Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO) from March 2014 to February 2020. The patient data included age, sex, height, and weight. Preoperative, determined, and modifiable factors were categorized using X-ray and CT data to create ensemble models with better predictive performance. Among the 57 ensemble models, which is the total number of possible combinations with six models, the model with the highest area under curve (AUC) or F1-score was selected as the final ensemble model. Gain feature importance analysis and the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) feature explanation were performed on the best models. RESULTS: The ensemble model with the highest AUC was a combination of a light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) (AUC = 0.992). The ensemble model with the highest F1-score was the model that combined logistic regression (LR) and MLP (F1-score = 0.765). Distance X was the most predictive feature in the results of both model interpretation analyses. CONCLUSION: Two types of ensemble models, LGBM with MLP and LR with MLP, were developed as machine learning models to predict LHF with high predictive performance. Using these models, surgeons can identify important features to prevent LHF and establish strategies by adjusting modifiable factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Closing wedge distal femoral osteotomies (CWDFO) are attractive treatment options for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis with coronal plane deformity. However, it has been traditionally associated with high rates of hinge fracture that can adversely impact recovery and patient outcomes. Appropriate siting of hinge point can be an effective method of reducing the incidence of hinge fractures. This study aims to illustrate a case series of CWDFO with low rates of hinge fracture utilising our preferred hinge point site. METHODS: A retrospective study of a cohort of 39 CWDFO was performed between May 2019 and May 2022. Both medial and lateral CWDFO were included. The hinge point in all cases was placed at the level of the inferior margin of the metaphyseal flare, and inferior to the gastrocnemius origin, with a hinge thickness of 10 mm. Post-operative radiographs were obtained at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery to assess for hinge fracture and union. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases of CWDFO were performed, consisting of eighteen cases of valgus malalignment that underwent medial CWDFO and twenty-one cases of varus malalignment that underwent lateral CWDFO. At surgery, the mean age was 47.6 (± 13.9) years and mean BMI was 29.4 (± 4.9). There were 23 men and 16 women. Three cases of hinge fractures occurred intraoperatively, translating into a hinge fracture rate of 7.69%. However, union was achieved in all three cases and all patients in this case series were able to progress to weight bear as tolerated at 2 months post-osteotomy. CONCLUSION: Distal placement of the hinge at the level of the inferior metaphyseal flare margin with the use of a hinge wire can greatly reduce the rates of hinge fracture in CWDFO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) is indicated for isolated lateral osteoarthritis in the valgus morphotype. Medial hinge fracture is a factor for poor prognosis. The present study had two aims: (1) to assess the impact of a temporary K-wire on hinge fracture risk; and (2) to assess the impact of LOWDFO opening speed. HYPOTHESIS: The main study hypothesis was that a temporary hinge K-wire reduces hinge fracture risk. The second hypothesis was that faster opening speed increases fracture risk. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twenty femurs were produced by 3D printing from a CT database, reproducing LOWDFO anatomy. The ABS® polymer showed the same breaking-point behavior as human bone. Ten specimens were included in the "K-wire" group (KW+) and 10 in the "No K-wire" group (KW-). To determine high and low speed, a motion-capture glove was used by 2 operators, providing 3D modeling of the surgeon's hand. High speed was defined as 152mm/min and low speed as 38mm/min. The KW+ and KW- groups were subdivided into high- and low-speed subgroups (HS, LS) of 5 each. Compression tests were conducted using an Instron® mechanical test machine up to hinge fracture. The main endpoint was maximum breaking-point force (N); the secondary endpoints were maximum displacement (mm) and maximum speed (min) at breaking point. RESULTS: The K-wire significantly increased maximum breaking-point force (LS, 143.08N vs. 93.71N, p<0.01; and HS, 186.98N vs. 95.22N, p<0.01), but not maximum displacement (LS, 26.17mm vs. 24.11mm, p=0.31; and HS 26.18mm vs. 23.66mm, p=0.14) or maximum time (LS, 27.07s vs. 24.94s, p=0.31; and HS, 5.24s vs. 4.73s, p=0.14). Speed did not affect maximum force (KW+, 143.08N vs. 186.98N, p=0.06; and KW-, 93.71N vs. 95.22N, p=0.42) or maximum displacement (KW+, 26.17mm vs. 26.18mm, p=1; and KW-, 24.11mm vs. 23.66mm, p=0.69). Only maximum time was greater at low speed (KW+, 27.07s vs. 5.24s, p>0.01; and KW-, 24.94s vs. 4.73s, p<0.01), which is obvious for constant distance. DISCUSSION: The first study hypothesis was confirmed, with significantly lower hinge fracture risk with the K-wire, independently of opening speed. The second hypothesis was not confirmed. The study was performed under strict experimental conditions, unprecedented to our knowledge in the literature. However, complementary clinical studies are needed to confirm the present findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, experimental study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported that lateral hinge fracture (LHF) has a negative effect on bone healing at the osteotomy site after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCDFO). However, limited evidence exists in the literature regarding the predictive factors for LHF in MCDFO. HYPOTHESIS: A large medial closing gap and a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area would increase plain radiography-based and/or computed tomography (CT)-based LHF in MCDFO. STUDY DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 67 knees of 53 patients (mean age, 37.4 ± 16.9 years) who underwent MCDFO between May 2009 and June 2021. The surgical indications for MCDFO were genu valgum deformity combined with either lateral compartment osteoarthritis or recurrent patellar dislocation. The presence of LHF was evaluated based on immediate postoperative plain radiography and CT scans. The predictive factors for LHF in MCDFO were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: LHFs were identified in 21 knees (31.3%) through plain radiography and in 40 knees (59.7%) through CT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the medial closing gap and lateral hinge position were predictive factors for plain radiography- and CT-based LHF after MCDFO. Controlling for other variables, we found that an increase in the medial opening gap by 1 mm increased the likelihood of plain radiography-based LHF by a factor of 1.805 (95% CI, 1.291-2.525; P = .001) and CT-based LHF by 1.333 (95% CI, 1.003-1.772; P = .048). Moreover, a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area increased the likelihood of plain radiography-based LHF by a factor of 9.870 (95% CI, 2.179-44.720; P = .003) and CT-based LHF by 5.686 (95% CI, 1.124-28.754; P = .036). CONCLUSION: A large medial closing gap and lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area are associated with LHF in MCDFO. Care should be taken to prevent LHF in MCDFO with a large medial closing gap. Moreover, a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area should be avoided to decrease the incidence of LHF in MCDFO.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Whether lateral hinge fracture (LHF) after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is associated with the change in tibial posterior slope (PS) has not been determined. Risk factors for PS increase are still unknown. Hypothesis: There will be no difference in patient characteristics and radiographic factors when stratified by change in tibial PS (ΔPS). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We reviewed the records of 148 patients who underwent OWHTO with locking-plate fixation from 2010 to 2016. Included were those with a minimum 2-year follow-up and true lateral radiographs before and at 1 year after surgery. ΔPS was defined as a difference between preoperative and 1-year postoperative PS, with positive values indicating PS increase. ΔPS was classified into <3°, 3° to <6°, and ≥6°. Any LHFs were grouped by Takeuchi classification as stable (type 1) or unstable (types 2 and 3). Risk factors for PS increase were evaluated using ordinal logistic regression analyses. Clinical outcomes according to ΔPS were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery score. Results: There were 79 (53.4%) patients with ΔPS <3°, 44 (29.7%) with 3° ≤ ΔPS < 6°, and 25 (16.9%) with ΔPS ≥6°. LHFs were observed in 41 (27.7%) patients: 32 with type 1 and 7 and 2 with types 2 and 3, respectively. Results of the multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis indicated that ΔPS was associated with unstable LHF (P = .005, exp[ß] = 6.34), preoperative PS (P = .028, exp[ß] = 0.90), and correction angle (P = .037, exp[ß] = 1.09). ΔPS ≥6° was seen in 4 of 9 (44.4%) patients with unstable LHF, 9 of 32 (28.1%) with stable LHF, and 12 of 107 (11.2%) with no LHF (P = .017). The mean correction angle was 11.3° ± 3.6° in patients with ΔPS ≥6°, 9.4° ± 4.6° in cases of 3° ≤ ΔPS < 6°, and 8.8° ± 3.6° in cases of ΔPS <3° (P = .019). Hospital for Special Surgery scores did not differ according to ΔPS. Conclusion: LHF type and correction angle were associated with ΔPS after OWHTO, and unstable LHF and large correction angle were risk factors for PS increase. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes according to ΔPS.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Valgus-producing medial opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomies (V-MOW-PTO) are used to treat isolated medial-compartment knee osteoarthritis in patients with varus malalignment. A fracture of the lateral cortical hinge is a risk factor for poor outcomes. Implantation of a protective K-wire has been suggested to prevent this complication. The primary objective of this bench study was to assess the ability of a protective K-wire to prevent lateral cortical fractures. The secondary objective was to evaluate the influence of the opening speed on fracture risk during the osteotomy. HYPOTHESIS: The primary hypothesis was that a protective K-wire decreased the risk of hinge fracture. The secondary hypothesis was that this risk was greater when the opening speed was high. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an experimental study of 20 simulated thermoplastic-polymer (ABS) tibias obtained by 3D printing to assess the effects of wedge-opening speed (high vs. low) and presence of a protective K-wire (yes vs. no). The opening rates were determined in a preliminary study of Sawbone® specimens opened using a distractor. The opening rate was measured using an accelerometer via a motion-capture glove. After assessing several high and low opening speeds, we selected 38mm/min and 152mm/min for the study. We divided the 20 ABS specimens into four groups of five each: high speed and K-wire, low speed and K-wire, high speed and no K-wire, and low speed and no K-wire. The force was applied using an Instron™ testing machine until construct failure. The primary outcome measure was the load at failure (N) and the secondary outcome measures were the displacement (mm) and maximum time to failure (s). RESULTS: At both speeds, values were significantly higher with vs. without a K-wire for load to failure (low: 253.3N vs. 175.5N, p<0.01; high: 262.2N vs. 154.1N, p<0.01), displacement (low: 11.1mm vs. 8.7mm, p<0.01; high: 11mm vs. 8.9mm; p=0.012), and maximal time to failure (low: 11.4 s vs. 8.9 s; p=0.012; high: 2.2 s vs. 1.8 s; p=0.011). Thus, the osteotomy opening speed seemed to have no influence on the risk of lateral cortex fracture. DISCUSSION: Our main hypothesis was confirmed but our secondary hypothesis was refuted: a protective K-wire significantly decreased the risk of hinge fracture, whereas the osteotomy opening speed had no influence. To our knowledge, this is the first published study assessing the potential influence of opening speed on risk of lateral cortex fracture. Our findings were obtained in the laboratory and should be evaluated in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, experimental study.

Asunto(s)