RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Many interventions implemented for multi-visit patients (MVP) have been developed to address patient-centric needs of these individuals and reduce unplanned care for ambulatory-sensitive conditions. More rigorous research is needed to better understand the impact of these interventions on changes in care utilization including unplanned care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the Enhanced Care Program (ECP), a payer-provider collaborative model, on unplanned care use and cost of care. DESIGN: Using propensity methods, a comparison group was constructed using insurer membership files. Comparisons were performed using a difference-in-differences analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients enrolled in ECP through December 2019 were considered eligible for the study (n = 357). All patients had five or more ED visits in the past year or two or more inpatient hospitalizations in the past year prior to enrollment. EXPOSURES: ECP is a high-intensity outpatient intervention intended to reduce avoidable unplanned care such as ED visits and inpatient hospital stays through home visits, chronic/acute disease management, and intensive care coordination. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcomes of interest were events per 100 members per year of ED use with return to home, unplanned inpatient and observational status admissions, and unplanned behavioral health inpatient admission, and cost of care per member per month. KEY RESULTS: Overall total unplanned care encounters were significantly reduced with a difference-in-difference of 320 unplanned care encounters per 100 members per year in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The ECP group showed statistically significant decreases in costs of unplanned ED, unplanned observation admission, and unplanned inpatient behavioral medicine costs, but statistically significant increases in overall pharmacy costs and lab costs. Changes in total costs of care for the ECP group were not statistically different than the control group (p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: ECP showed significant reduction of unplanned care for MVP patients.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study comprehensively investigates the changes in healthcare utilization among chronic patients with regular outpatient visits to hospitals after the occurrence of Covid-19. The research examines whether patients altered their originally regular medical attendance frequencies due to the pandemic and explores potential negative impacts on the health conditions of those irregular attendees post-pandemic. METHODS: Data for this study were sourced from a database at a medical center in Taiwan. The subjects were chronic patients with regular hospital outpatient visits before the Covid-19 outbreak. The study tracked medical utilization patterns from 2017 to 2022 for different patient characteristics and outpatient behaviors, employing statistical methods such as Repeated Measures ANOVA and Generalized Estimating Equation to analyze changes in healthcare utilization and health status during the post-pandemic period. RESULTS: The results reveal that, compared to the regular group, chronic patients with irregular outpatient visits during the post-pandemic period exhibited a decrease of 5.85 annual outpatient visits, a reduction of NT$20,290.1 in annual medical expenses, and a significantly higher abnormality rate in average biochemical test results by 0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings contribute to understanding the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on healthcare utilization and health conditions among outpatient chronic disease populations. In response to the new medical landscape in the post-pandemic era, proactive suggestions are made, including providing telemedicine outpatient services and referral-based medical care to meet the needs of the target population, ensuring a continuous and reassuring healthcare model for chronic patients, and mitigating the operational impacts of public health emergencies on hospitals.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Informal caregiving involves increased responsibilities, with financial and emotional challenges, thereby affecting the well-being of the caregiver. We aimed to investigate the effect of spousal mental illness on hospital visits and medical spending among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent GI cancer surgery between 2013 and 2020 were identified from the IBM Marketscan database. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the association between spousal mental illness and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: A total of 6,035 patients underwent GI surgery for a malignant indication. Median age was 54 years (IQR: 49-59), most patients were male (n = 3592, 59.5%), and had a CCI score of ≤ 2 (n = 5512, 91.3%). Of note, in the 1 year follow-up period, 19.4% (anxiety: n = 509, 8.4%; depression: n = 301, 5.0%; both anxiety and depression: n = 273, 4.5%; severe mental illness: n = 86, 1.4%) of spouses developed a mental illness. On multivariable analysis, after controlling for competing factors, spousal mental illness remained independently associated with increased odds of emergency department visits (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05-1.38) and becoming a super healthcare utilizer (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04-1.79), as well as 12.1% (95% CI 10.6-15.3) higher medical spending. CONCLUSION: Among patients with GI cancer spousal mental illness is associated with higher rates of outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and expenditures during the 1-year postoperative period. These findings underscore the importance of caregiving resources and counseling in alleviating caregiver burden, thereby reducing the overall burden on the healthcare system.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop an intrinsic capacity (IC) score and to investigate the association between IC transition with overall and cause-specific mortality, incident disability and healthcare utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from 1852 respondents aged ≥ 65 years who completed the 1999 and 2003 surveys of the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging were analyzed. MEASUREMENTS: Transitions of IC score were categorized into three groups: (1) Improved IC (IC2003-1999 >0), (2) Stable IC (IC2003-1999 = 0), (3) Worsened IC (IC2003-1999 <0). Cox regression and subdistribution hazard models were used to investigate IC transitions and 4-year overall and cause-specific mortality, respectively. Logistic regression were employed to develop weighted IC score (wIC, 0-16) and assess its association with incident disability and healthcare utilization. Similar analysis were repeated using non-weighted IC (nIC, 0-8) to ensure robustness. RESULTS: Comparing to decreased wIC group, stable or increased wIC participants had significantly lower 4-year all-cause mortality, and death from infection, cardiometabolic/cerebrovascular diseases, organ failure and other causes. (Hazard ratio (HR) ranged from 0.36 to 0.56, 95% CI ranged from 0.15 to 1.00, p ≤ 0.049 in the stable wIC group; HR ranged from 0.41 to 0.51, 95% CI ranged from 0.22 to 0.94, p ≤ 0.034 in the increased wIC group). Moreover, individuals with stable or increased wIC demonstrated lower risk of incident disability and hospitalization. (Odds ratio (OR) = ranged from 0.34 to 0.70, 95% CI ranged from 0.19 to 1.00, p ≤ 0.048). Participants with stable wIC also exhibited reduced risk of emergency department visits (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.82, p = 0.002). These results were generally consistent in the nIC model. CONCLUSION: Participants with stable or increased IC experienced significantly lower all-cause and most cause-specific mortality, incident disability, and healthcare utilization, which was independent of baseline IC and comorbidities. The findings remained consistent across weighted and non-weighted IC model.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In 2016, the Chinese government officially scaled up family doctor contracted services (FDCS) scheme to guide patients' health seeking behavior from tertiary hospitals to primary health facilities. METHODS: This study evaluated the overall gate-keeping effects of this scheme on healthcare utilization of rural residents by using a difference-in-differences (DiD) design. The analysis was based on Shandong Rural Elderly Health Cohort 2019 and 2020. Participants who contracted FDCS in second round and were not contracted with a family doctor in the first round were regarded as treatment group. In total, 310 respondents who have used medical care were incorporated for final study. RESULTS: Participants who contracted FDCS (treatment group) experienced a significant decline in the mean level of first-contact health-care facilities, decreasing from 2.204 to 1.981. In contrast, participants who did not contract FDCS (control group), showed an increasing trend in the mean level of first-contact health-care facilities, rising from 2.128 to 2.445. Our results showed that contracting FDCS is associated with approximately 0.54 extra lower mean level of first-contact health-care facilities (P = 0.03, 95% CI: -1.03 to 0.05), which suggests an approximately 24.5% reduction in the mean first-contact health-care facility level for participants compared with contracted FDCS than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested primary healthcare quality should be strengthened and restrictive first point of contact policy should be enacted to establish ordered healthcare seeking behavior among rural residents.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of teleneurology on healthcare utilization (HCU) in MS is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the association between teleneurology and HCU. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of HCU among adult MS and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients residing in the Cleveland/Akron area from July 2020 to July 2022. Negative binomial regression models evaluated the association between number of laboratory and MRI orders per visit and number of emergency visits per patient across patient groups with variable proportions of teleneurology visits. RESULTS: A total of 3208 patients completed 15,795 visits. Patients using teleneurology had more visits (rate ratio (RR) 1.707-1.719, p < 0.001). Teleneurology visits had fewer laboratory (RR 0.571) and MRI orders (RR 0.693, p < 0.001). There was no difference in emergency care utilization for teleneurology patients (p ⩾ 0.05). More emergency visits were observed in Black (RR 1.414) and Medicaid (RR 1.893) patients, regardless of visit type (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Teleneurology visits were associated with fewer orders, suggesting teleneurology may be incorporated into healthcare models without increasing utilization related to the visit. Teleneurology was also associated with increased visit volumes but no difference in emergency HCU. More studies are needed to clarify the ultimate impact of teleneurology on overall HCU. More emergency visits, regardless of visit type, were observed among at-risk populations, warranting further investigation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As with many countries worldwide, Singapore is experiencing a rapidly ageing population. Presentation of older persons for urgent but non-emergent conditions to the Emergency Department (ED) represents a growing group of patients utilising public healthcare emergency services and puts a strain on current ED resources. The medical conditions vary, and resources used has been poorly characterized. METHODS: This is a single-center cross-sectional observational study of patients aged 55 to 75 years old who visited the ED with urgent conditions, Patient Acuity Category Scale (PACS) P2 or P3, who were subsequently discharged. The patients visited a public hospital in Singapore on four randomly selected weekdays in April 2023. The utilisation of hospital resources and manpower was studied. A formulated criteria was used to determine the appropriate site of care, such as an Urgent Care Centre (UCC), Primary Care Providers (PCP) clinic or the ED. RESULTS: There were 235 eligible patients during the study period, with a mean age of 65.1 years of which a majority, 183 (77.9%) were allocated to patient acuity category scale P2. Most of the patients were walk-in patients with no referrals (169 (71.9%)). Based on the criteria, the majority of 187 (79.6%) of these patient may be safely managed at an outpatient setting; 71 (30.2%) patients by PCP, 116 (49.4%) patients may be managed by an UCC, with the remaining 48 (20.4%) requiring ED care. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a significant portion of discharged older ED adults with urgent but non-emergent conditions may be adequately managed at outpatient medical services that are appropriately resourced. More research is needed on healthcare initiatives aimed at developing the capabilities of outpatient medical services to manage mild to moderate acute conditions to optimise ED resource allocation.

RESUMEN

Understanding the healthcare needs of bereaved individuals following terrorism is crucial for organizing healthcare services. This cross-sectional study examined the terror-related healthcare needs, healthcare utilization, and satisfaction with professional healthcare among 122 traumatically bereaved parents and siblings eight years after the 2011 Utøya terrorist attack in Norway. Results showed that over 50% of the participants currently needed help coping with their grief or with mental and somatic symptoms, and only 34% were actively utilizing healthcare related to the terror attack. Furthermore, 68% reported not getting sufficient help, suggesting a treatment gap. One-third rated the professional help and treatment as unsatisfactory, with 28% reporting that they had not received competent help. More somatic and posttraumatic stress symptoms were associated with higher healthcare needs, whilst higher levels of insomnia symptoms were associated with lower healthcare satisfaction. This emphasizes the need to recognize, professionally intervene, and provide competent support for traumatically bereaved individuals.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) imposes significant healthcare costs and strains emergency services. This study aimed to identify factors associated with unplanned healthcare usage among children with IBD in a rural, medically underserved region in the southeastern United States. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed children (<18 years) with moderate or severe IBD followed at an academic pediatric gastroenterology clinic between 2016 and 2021. Each planned visit was treated as a separate observation, and patients were followed after each planned visit until the occurrence of the earliest unplanned healthcare event, until the next planned visit, or until censoring. RESULTS: In our analysis of 471 planned visits from 70 children with IBD, we observed 84 (18%) unplanned visits within 12 months, with 39 of these visits related to IBD. Unplanned visits occurred at a median interval of 39 days, predominantly to the emergency department (ED). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed a higher hazard of unplanned visits among female patients, individuals with elevated C-reactive protein levels and anemia, those covered by Medicaid insurance, and those residing closer to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidates the challenges faced by children with IBD in rural settings. By identifying factors associated with unplanned healthcare utilization, we can better pinpoint patients who may benefit from targeted interventions to reduce such visits.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital stay after an uncomplicated delivery is typically 2 days for vaginal birth and 3 days for cesarean birth. Health maintenance organizations and third-party payers have encouraged shorter maternity stays. The safety of earlier discharge is unclear particularly when it comes to patients diagnosed with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). OBJECTIVE: To examine whether expedited discharge amongst patients with HDP will have a negative effect on postpartum readmission rate and blood pressure related complications. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single academic center retrospective cohort study of patients with HDP (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or chronic hypertension) during 2 epochs: 2015-2018, prior to implementation of an expedited discharge policy, and 2019-2020 after hospital wide implementation of expedited postpartum discharge. The expedited discharge policy entailed patients being discharged home as soon as day 1 after a vaginal delivery and day 2 after a cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was unplanned health care utilization postpartum, defined as Emergency Department (ED) visits, unscheduled clinic visits, and hospital readmission. Secondary outcomes were planned postpartum visits attendance, antihypertensive medication initiation after discharge, and blood pressure control throughout the first year. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were run to evaluate the association between expedited discharge and primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,441 patients were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of unplanned health care utilization (11.3% in the standard postpartum discharge group vs. 13.8% in the expedited discharge group, p=0.17). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures did not differ between the groups at 1-2 weeks, six weeks, and one year postpartum. Patients in the expedited discharge group were more likely to attend the 1-2-week postpartum blood pressure check (58.7% vs. 51.7%, p=0.02, adjusted OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08-1.77). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between the two cohort groups. CONCLUSION: In this single academic center study, expedited discharge after delivery in patients with HDP was not associated with a higher rate of unplanned healthcare utilization postpartum.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to understand health care utilization by comparing hospital encounters among individuals with spina bifida and the general population and to identify the factors associated with utilization. METHODS: Using the Department of Health Care Access and Information database (1995-2017), individuals with spina bifida were identified and matched to controls by birth year. The primary outcome measures were the number of hospital encounters (stratified as ≤2 vs ≥3 encounters) and the time between the first and second encounters. Univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses were performed to identify factors associated with ≥ 3 encounters. RESULTS: When compared to controls, individuals with spina bifida had more ≥ 3 hospital encounters (69% vs 29%), spent more days in the hospital (58 days vs 13 days), and had a higher average charge per hospital stay ($433,537 vs $99,975) (P < .001 for all). After adjusting for covariates, we found that having spina bifida was associated with increased hospital encounters compared to controls (odds ratio 3.95, 95% CI 3.77-4.14, P < .001). Individuals with spina bifida were found to have less time between their first and second encounters (2.5 vs 3.3 years, P < .001). Within the spina bifida population, sex, race, ethnicity, comorbidities, and nonprivate insurance were associated with ≥ 3 encounters. CONCLUSIONS: Spina bifida is associated with more hospital encounters and fewer days between first and second encounters compared to the general population. These findings highlight factors driving increased utilization of resources, thereby empowering providers to better support this vulnerable population.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Celiac disease (CeD) is an autoimmune disorder triggered by the immune response to gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. Recent research has unveiled a heightened risk of developing specific malignant neoplasms (MN) and various malignancies, including gastrointestinal, lymphomas, skin, and others, in individuals with CeD. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of MN in hospitalized CeD patients in the United States. METHODS: Using data from the National Inpatient Sample spanning two decades, from January 2000 to December 2019, we identified 529842 CeD patients, of which 78128 (14.75%) had MN. Propensity score matching, based on age, sex, race, and calendar year, was employed to compare CeD patients with the general non-CeD population at a 1:1 ratio. RESULTS: Positive associations were observed for several malignancies, including small intestine, lymphoma, nonmelanoma skin, liver, melanoma skin, pancreas myelodysplastic syndrome, biliary, stomach, and other neuroendocrine tumors (excluding small and large intestine malignant carcinoid), leukemia, uterus, and testis. Conversely, CeD patients exhibited a reduced risk of respiratory and secondary malignancies. Moreover, certain malignancies showed null associations with CeD, including head and neck, nervous system, esophagus, colorectal, anus, breast, malignant carcinoids, bone and connective tissues, myeloma, cervix, and ovary cancers. CONCLUSION: Our study is unique in highlighting the detailed results of positive, negative, or null associations between different hematologic and solid malignancies and CeD. Furthermore, it offers insights into evolving trends in CeD hospital outcomes, shedding light on advancements in its management over the past two decades. These findings contribute valuable information to the understanding of CeD's impact on health and healthcare utilization.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older adults with cognitive impairment exhibit different patterns of healthcare utilization compared to their cognitively healthy counterparts. Despite extensive research in high-income countries, similar studies in low- and middle-income countries are lacking. This study aims to investigate the population-level patterns in healthcare utilization among older adults with and without cognitive impairment in Mexico. METHODS: Data came from five waves (2001-2018) of the Mexican Health and Aging Study. We used self-reported measures for one or more over-night hospital stays, doctor visits, visits to homeopathic doctors, and dental visits in the past year; seeing a pharmacist in the past year; and being screened for cholesterol, diabetes, and hypertension in the past two years. Cognitive impairment was defined using a modified version of the Cross Cultural Cognitive Examination that assessed verbal memory, visuospatial and visual scanning. Total sample included 5,673 participants with cognitive impairment and 34,497 without cognitive impairment interviewed between 2001 and 2018. Generalized Estimating Equation models that adjusted for time-varying demographic and health characteristics and included an interaction term between time and cognitive status were used. RESULTS: For all participants, the risk for one or more overnight hospital stays, doctor visits, and dental visits in the past year, and being screened for diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol increased from 2001 to 2012 and leveled off or decreased in 2015 and 2018. Conversely, seeing a homeopathic doctor decreased. Cognitive impairment was associated with higher risk of hospitalization (RR = 1.13, 1.03-1.23) but lower risk of outpatient services (RR = 0.95, 0.93-0.97), cholesterol screening (RR = 0.93, 0.91-0.96), and diabetes screening (RR = 0.95, 0.92-0.97). No significant difference was observed in the use of pharmacists, homeopathic doctors, or folk healers based on cognitive status. Interaction effects indicated participants with cognitive impairment had lower risk for dental visits and hypertension screening but that these trajectories differed over time compared to participants without cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: We identified distinct population-level trends in self-reported healthcare utilization and differences according to cognitive status, particularly for elective and screening services. These findings highlight the necessity for policy interventions to ensure older adults with cognitive impairment have their healthcare needs met.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic increase in telemedicine use for direct patient care. Inequities in device/internet access can limit the extent to which patients can engage with telemedicine care and exacerbate health disparities. In this review, we examined existing literature on interventions designed to improve patient telemedicine access by providing digital devices including tablets, smartphones, and computers and/or internet connectivity. Methods: In this systematic scoping review, we searched four databases for peer-reviewed studies published 1/1/2000-10/19/2021 that described healthcare interventions that provided patients with devices and/or internet connectivity and reported outcomes related to telemedicine access and/or usage. Data extraction elements included: study population, setting, intervention design, details on device/connectivity provision, and outcomes evaluated. Results: Twelve articles reflecting seven unique interventions met inclusion criteria. Ten articles examined telemedicine utilization (83%) and reported improved patient show rates/utilization. Seven articles examined patient satisfaction with the interventions (58%) and reported positive experiences. Fewer articles examined health outcomes (17%; 2/12) though these also demonstrated positive results. Across included studies, study quality was low. There were no controlled trials, and the most rigorously designed studies (n = 4) involved pre/post-intervention assessments. Discussion: Findings from this review indicate that providing material technology supports to patients can facilitate telemedicine access, is acceptable to patients and clinicians, and can contribute to improved health outcomes. The low number and quality of existing studies limits the strength of this evidence. Future research should explore interventions that can increase equitable access to telemedicine services. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=183442, identifier, PROSPERO: CRD42020183442.

RESUMEN

Aim: Low Back Pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a more effective, long-term treatment compared to conventional medical management (CMM). The DISTINCT study enrolled and randomized chronic LBP patients with no indication of traditional spine surgery. This analysis focuses comparing study outcomes on patients initially randomized to receive CMM treatment and subsequently crossed over to SCS after 6 months. Purpose: To compare the therapeutic effectiveness and cost-efficiency of passive recharge burst SCS to CMM. Patients and Methods: A total of 269 patients were enrolled with 162 randomly assigned to SCS and 107 to CMM. The DISTINCT study design allowed a crossover to the alternative treatment arm after 6 months. Patients underwent a trial and received a permanent implant if they reported ≥50% pain reduction. Outcome analysis included pain (NRS), disability (ODI), catastrophizing (PCS), quality of life (PROMIS-29) and health care utilization. Results: Seventy out of eighty-one patients opted to cross over to trial SCS at 6M with 94% (66/70) undergoing a trial. Among those, 88% (58/66) reported a ≥50% or more pain relief and 55 received a permanent implant. At 12M visit, 71.4% reported a ≥50% pain improvement sustained at the 18M visit, with 24.5% (12/49) indicating a ≥80% improvement. Disability reductions (79% meeting the minimally important difference of a 13-point decrease), decreased catastrophizing, and significant improvements in all PROMIS-29 domains were noted. Furthermore, 42% of the patients reported decreased or discontinued opioid usage. Clinical benefits at the 12M visit were sustained through the 18M visit accompanied by a significant reduction in healthcare utilization and a $1214 cost savings. Conclusion: SCS demonstrates superior, long-term performance and safety outcomes compared to CMM therapy in LBP patients who received both CMM and SCS therapy. Additionally, SCS patients experienced reduced healthcare resource utilization and lower costs compared to those receiving CMM.

RESUMEN

Background: Through their expertise and diverse skills, Parkinson Nurses are key care providers for people with Parkinson's disease. They are seen as an important profession for person-centered and multidisciplinary care, considered priorities in Parkinson's care delivery. Currently, however, little is known about the priorities that this profession itself defines for the care of Parkinson's patients and how they perceive their own role in the care process. Objective: To explore the perspective of Parkinson Nurses on care priorities in people with Parkinson's disease. Design: Qualitative study. Settings: The iCare-PD study served as the object of study by establishing an interdisciplinary, person-centered and nurse-led care model in several European countries and Canada. The nurses who participated in this model were part of the study. Participants: Six Parkinson Nurses participated in the study. Methods: We conducted a thematic focus group, adopting the paradigm of pragmatism to draft an interview guide. The focus group was based on the inspiration card method and followed recommendations for co-creation processes. Results: Parkinson Nurses define care priorities for Parkinson's in areas of education, multi-professionalism, and need-orientation. They see themselves as mediators and coordinators of care delivery processes. Conclusions: In line with international recommendations, Parkinson Nurses prioritize key aspects of multidisciplinary and person-centered care. At the same time, however, the nurses also name care priorities that go beyond the international recommendations. It is therefore crucial to integrate the perspective of this important profession into recommendations for the delivery of healthcare for people with Parkinson's.Tweetable abstract How do specialized nurses define priorities for person-centered Parkinson's care? Answers are sought in this qualitative study by @MarlenaMunster.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Persistent gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are frequently experienced by colon cancer survivors and may help identify patients with higher utilization of healthcare services. To assess the relationship between GI symptoms and specialty care utilization among colon cancer survivors. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal cohort study at an academic medical center of 126 adults surgically treated for stage I-IV colon cancer between February 2017 and June 2022. Participants reported GI symptoms through the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 at enrollment and as frequently as every 6 months for 5 years. Main outcome measures were visits, telephone encounters, and secure messages with a medical provider within specialty oncology clinics within 6 months after each survey completion. Generalized linear mixed regression model for repeated measurements with random trajectory for each participant was performed to estimate the associations between symptoms and healthcare use. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical and surgical factors, and timing in relation to onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: In the 6 months after each survey time point, patients averaged 1.2 visits, 0.5 telephone encounters, and 3.2 patient-initiated messages. In adjusted models, those with any abdominal pain (RR 1.45; p = 0.002), buttock pain (RR 1.30; p = 0.050), or increased stool frequency (RR 1.26; p = 0.046) had more clinic visits in the following 6 months than those without these symptoms. Including these three symptoms in one model revealed that only abdominal pain was statistically significantly associated with increased clinic visits (RR 1.36; p = 0.016). Patients with any blood or mucus in stool (RR 2.46; p = 0.009) had significantly more telephone encounters, and those with any abdominal pain (RR 1.65; p = 0.002) had significantly more patient-initiated messages than those without these symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identify GI symptoms associated with increased use of oncologic specialty care among colon cancer survivors, with abdominal pain as an important predictor of utilization. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Early identification and anticipatory management of colon cancer survivors experiencing abdominal pain may decrease healthcare utilization.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy deserts represent areas where residents face significant challenges to accessing pharmacies. North Carolina (NC) presents an intriguing case study due to its diverse geographic landscape yet lacks extensive research regarding its pharmacy deserts. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to map pharmacy deserts in NC using pharmacy location and Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) data measured using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and descriptively characterize healthcare utilization statistics for University of North Carolina (UNC) Health's catchment population. METHODS: Pharmacy location data was compiled from the NC Board of Pharmacy. Pharmacy deserts were defined based on SVI >0.75 and distance thresholds aligned to United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) standards. Residential characteristics were retrieved from PolicyMap and Social Explorer databases. UNC Health patient utilization data were collected by UNC Pharmacy Data Analytics group for three NC counties. RESULTS: 2,002 NC pharmacies met inclusion criteria. 17.2% urban tracts (1.3M residents) and 4.25% rural tracts (0.14M residents) were identified as pharmacy deserts (adj. p<0.001). Those residing in deserts had significantly less internet access, annual medical cost per capita, and access to homeless relief services as well as significantly higher food insecurity rates and Medicare cost per capita (adj. p <0.001). UNC specific healthcare utilization statistics for the three assessed counties were all poorer in deserts compared to non-deserts within the same counties (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: A geospatial map with the location of pharmacy deserts in NC was created to highlight differences in patient healthcare utilization, affecting rural and urban areas. By incorporating SDOH predictors, this study provides a more nuanced map of NC pharmacy deserts compared to reviewing distance to pharmacies alone. Higher rates of emergency room and inpatient visits in counties with more residents in pharmacy deserts suggests potential health outcomes associated with limited pharmacy access.

RESUMEN

Introduction: People with diabetes were among the populations that experienced the most profound impacts during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors estimated changes in healthcare utilization and expenditures for commercially insured adults aged 18-64 years with diabetes during the pandemic. Methods: Medical claims data were from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus. Linear regressions were used to estimate the changes in utilization (per 1,000 individuals) for inpatient stays, emergency room visits, physician office visits, and ambulatory surgery center procedures. Changes in expenditures, in total and out of pocket, were estimated using generalized linear models. Expenditures were adjusted to 2021 U.S. dollars using the Consumer Price Index. Results: Utilization was reduced significantly for all service types during the pandemic. Although the largest reduction occurred between March 2020 and May 2020, the decrease persisted throughout 2021. During March 2020-May 2020, ambulatory surgery center procedures were reduced by 4.7 visits per 1,000 individuals. The reduction ranged between 0.4 and 1.3 visits per 1,000 individuals subsequently. Expenditures declined for all service types during March 2020-May 2020. However, after May 2020, the reduction remained statistically significant only for physician office visits for all months, with varying changes in expenditures for other service types. Conclusions: Healthcare utilization and expenditures reduced among commercially insured adults with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic.