Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.445
Filtrar
1.
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers ; 11(2): 353-360, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39268245

RESUMEN

Adolescent (cisgender) sexual minority males (ASMM) face multiple mental health disparities. Yet surprisingly little is known about use of mental health care among ASMM. The current study examined mental health care use among ASMM, both lifetime use and during the COVID-19 pandemic. ASMM (N=154, ages 14-17 years) enrolled in Spring 2020 for a pilot randomized controlled trial of an online sexual health intervention. Participants were assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Participants reported lifetime (at baseline) and recent (at follow-up) mental health care use. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed at both timepoints. Differences in care use by sociodemographics, healthcare access, and mental health symptoms were established. More than half of participants reported clinically significant anxiety and depressive symptoms at baseline and at follow-up. Of those youth, fifty-three percent reported lifetime mental health care use, while only 28% reported recent care at follow-up. Being out to an accepting guardian (aOR=4.0, 95% CI: 1.9-8.4), having a primary care physician (aOR=2.6, 95% CI: 1.0-6.7), and having clinically significant symptoms (aOR=3.1, 95% CI: 1.5-6.5) were each independently associated with a greater odds of having received lifetime mental health care. Findings indicate that many ASMM in the sample received mental health care in their lifetimes. However, more participants endorsed clinically significant anxiety/depressive symptoms than received care at both timepoints. This disparity was even more pronounced approximately five months into the COVID-19 pandemic. Research and practice efforts must reduce care barriers and augment facilitators for all ASMM, with particular urgency during COVID-19 and its aftermath.

2.
J Wrist Surg ; 13(5): 432-438, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39296656

RESUMEN

Background It is unclear whether nonpharmacologic intervention for depressive disorder (DD) in the preoperative period can prevent postoperative complications in hand surgery patients. Questions/Purpose The aims were to evaluate whether psychotherapy visits/depression screenings within 90 days of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fractures (DRFs) were associated with lower rates of (1) medical complications and (2) health care utilization (emergency department [ED] visits and readmissions). Methods A retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database from 2010 to 2021 was performed. DD patients who underwent ORIF for DRF were 1:5 propensity score matched by comorbidities, including those who did ( n = 8,993) and did not ( n = 44,503) attend a psychotherapy visit/depression screening 90 days before surgery. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to compare the odds ratio (OR) of medical complications, ED visits, and readmissions within 90 days. The p -values less than 0.001 were significant. Results DD patients who did not attend a preoperative psychotherapy visit/depression screening experienced fivefold higher odds of total medical complications (25.66 vs. 5.27%; OR: 5.25, p < 0.0001), including surgical site infections (1.23 vs. 0.14%; OR: 8.71, p < 0.0001), deep wound infections (0.98 vs. 0.17%; OR: 6.00, p < 0.0001), and transfusions (1.64 vs. 0.22%; OR: 7.61, p < 0.0001). Those who did not attend a psychotherapy visit/depression screening experienced higher odds of ED utilizations (9.71 vs. 2.71%; OR: 3.87, p < 0.0001), however, no difference in readmissions (3.40 vs. 3.54%; OR: 0.96, p = 0.569). Conclusion Depression screening may be a helpful preoperative intervention to optimize patients with DD undergoing hand surgery to minimize postoperative complications and health care utilization. Level of Evidence Level III.

3.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39287915

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate health care utilization among patients with hematologic malignancies and its association with socioeconomic position (SEP) and compare health care utilization with a cancer-free population. METHODS: Patients with aggressive lymphoma, indolent lymphoma, or multiple myeloma (MM), diagnosed between 1999-2010 and 2015-2019, participated in longitudinal patient-reported outcome research, up to 11 years post-diagnosis. Questionnaires assessed health care utilization at the general practitioner (GP), medical specialist, and additional health care. SEP was based on education and income, categorized as low, medium, or high. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Mixed models and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The study included 2319 patients (71% response rate), who completed on average five measurements. Patients with MM reported the highest health care utilization, both at the GP and medical specialist. Low SEP was associated with higher utilization at the GP (medium education ß = - 0.72, p = 0.01; high education ß = - 1.15, p < 0.001) and lower utilization of additional physical (OR = 1.7, p = 0.01) and psychosocial (OR = 1.5, p < 0.05) care, among all patients. For patients with MM, high SEP was also associated with higher utilization of health care at the medical specialist (high education ß = 2.56, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hematologic malignancy-related and SEP-related disparities in health care utilization were observed. To ensure equal access to health consumption, attention is needed for patients with a low SEP to provide better guidance in their cancer (survivorship) care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Improving health literacy and involving informal caregivers and nurse-led patient navigation may help reduce disparities in access to (additional) health care.

4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob ; 3(4): 100316, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39234417

RESUMEN

Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM), a rare condition affecting about 32,000 individuals in the United States, is often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed owing to its nonspecific symptoms and the need for invasive biopsies. Objective: Our aim was to identify, classify, and characterize the natural history of patients with SM. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, administrative data from a large managed care organization was used to identify patients with confirmed SM, based on World Health Organization criteria. Demographic data, delay to diagnosis, disease progression, and health care resource utilization were examined. Results: Of 116 patients with confirmed SM, 77% had indolent SM, 2% had smoldering SM, 12% had SM with associated hematologic neoplasm, 9% had aggressive SM, and none had mast cell leukemia. In all, 5 patients were misclassified as having a less advanced SM subtype initially and 3 were completely undiagnosed (missed diagnosis). The average delay to diagnosis of SM was 58.3 plus or minus 73.1 months. In all, 18% of patients progressed from a nonadvanced form of SM (indolent or smoldering SM) to an advanced form of SM (aggressive SM, SM with associated hematologic neoplasm, or mast cell leukemia) over an average of 88.3 plus or minus 82.7 months. Patients with SM had increased health care utilization, including increases in their numbers of hospital admissions, emergency room visits, urgent care visits, and specialty provider visits, after diagnosis versus before. Conclusions: Rare diseases such as SM would benefit from increased understanding and awareness to improve diagnostic accuracy. Prospective studies are needed to better characterize this patient population and determine the type of follow-up needed to recognize advanced forms of SM so that appropriate treatment can be implemented.

5.
Heliyon ; 10(14): e34840, 2024 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39148983

RESUMEN

Background: The objective of our study is to analyze the health care received by older adults with COVID-19 according to their place of residence (whether or not they live in a long-term care [LTC] facility) and to find out the effect of health care on mortality. Methods: Retrospective cohort study based in Aragón (Spain) from March 2020 to March 2021 in patients aged 65 years or older with a confirmed COVID-19 infection. The population was classified according to their place of residence (living in a LTC or not). A propensity score was used to match individuals by sex and age. The effect of living in a LTC facility on healthcare delivery and mortality was conducted using adjusted multivariate models. Varimp was used to estimate the best predictors of mortality for both groups. Results: Healthcare services utilization varied depending on whether the patients lived in a LTC facility or not. The time to diagnosis was shorter in institutionalized patients, but the time to hospital admission was longer. Length of hospital stays, risk of ICU admission and 30-day mortality were also different and remained statistically significant in the adjusted models. The variables that were more important in the association between healthcare utilization and mortality were those associated with greater severity of COVID-19. Conclusions: There were differences in health care for older adults diagnosed with COVID-19 according to their place of residence. There is a need to strengthen collaboration between professionals in LTC centers and health services to provide equitable health care.

6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 17849, 2024 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090232

RESUMEN

Like many under resourced, island communities, most of the municipalities in Puerto Rico are medically underserved. However, there is limited information about changes in hospital capacity and any regional disparities in availability of hospital services in Puerto Rico, especially given the multiple public health emergencies the island has faced in recent years (e.g. hurricanes, earthquakes, and COVID-19). This study described the trends in hospital capacity and utilization for the Island of Puerto Rico and by health regions from 2010 to 2020. We analyzed the 2021-22 Area Health Resource File (AHRF) and aggregated the data by seven health regions, which are groupings of municipalities defined by the Puerto Rico Department of Health. Ten-year estimates for hospital utilization were adjusted for population size by health region. During the more recent five-year period, there were decreases in hospitals, hospital beds, and surgeries, which represent a shift from the earlier five-year period. Over the 10 years of the study period, there was an overall decrease in population-adjusted measures of hospital utilization on the island of Puerto Rico-despite multiple disasters that would, theoretically, increase need for health care services. We also found variation in hospital capacity and utilization by health regions indicating the rate of change was not uniform across Puerto Rico. The capacity of Puerto Rico's hospital system has shrunk over the past decade which may pose a challenge when responding to recurrent major public health emergencies, especially within specific health regions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Puerto Rico , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/tendencias
7.
Cureus ; 16(7): e65585, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39192915

RESUMEN

Introduction Hyperalbuminemia, defined as elevated serum albumin levels, may influence healthcare utilization, particularly unscheduled medical visits. The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) regulates serum albumin, which is crucial for maintaining oncotic pressure and substance transport. SNS instability, linked to chronic diseases, can impact albumin levels. This study investigates the association between hyperalbuminemia and unscheduled medical visits in community hospital outpatient departments, aiming to establish its potential as a predictor of healthcare utilization. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic medical records from Unnan City Hospital, Japan, from September 2021 to August 2023. Participants were over 15 years old and had albumin data available, excluding those with acute albumin conditions. The case group consisted of 321 hyperalbuminemia patients (serum albumin ≥ 5 g/dL), matched monthly with 16 controls. Data on demographics, chronic diseases, and unscheduled medical visits were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed the association between hyperalbuminemia and unscheduled medical visits. Results Among 716 participants, the hyperalbuminemia group (mean age 59.13 years) was younger than the non-hyperalbuminemia group (mean age 74.36 years). Hyperalbuminemia patients had a higher BMI, pulse rate, and prevalence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and brain stroke. Significant associations were found between hyperalbuminemia and unscheduled medical visits (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.56-3.53, p < 0.001), age, BMI, pulse rate, and brain stroke. Conclusion Hyperalbuminemia is significantly associated with increased unscheduled medical visits in rural outpatient settings. Routine serum albumin assessments can aid in risk stratification and personalized care, potentially reducing acute healthcare needs. Future research should explore underlying mechanisms and broader populations to enhance clinical applications.

8.
Popul Health Manag ; 2024 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189117

RESUMEN

For-profit companies addressing disparities in social determinants of health (SDOH), also known as SDOH Industry companies, often lack member-level claims data to evaluate their organizational interventions. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthy Days Measure, offer a unique proxy metric to evaluate impact. This retrospective study sought to explore the association between self-reported physically and mentally unhealthy days with health care costs among a Medicare Advantage (MA) population. A cross-sectional study of MA members receptive to a companion care program, and thus likely to have unmet social needs, was conducted. The analysis included members with recorded baseline unhealthy days and complete claims data (n = 2,354). Least squares regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between baseline medical costs, physically unhealthy days, and mentally unhealthy days. A review of Major Diagnostic Categories (MDCs) was also included to elucidate the strength of the Healthy Days Measure as an indicator of the burden of health conditions. Each additional unhealthy day reported was associated with an increase in 30-day medical costs of $60 and $34 for physically and mentally unhealthy days, respectively. Unhealthy days and costs increased with an increasing number of MDCs. Compared with previous studies linking unhealthy days and health care expenditure, these data reveal the potential for even higher savings by reducing the number of unhealthy days in a high-risk population. This evidence supports using unhealthy days as a HRQOL measure and as an important tool for cost estimations.

9.
LGBT Health ; 2024 Aug 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39149787

RESUMEN

Purpose: Our purpose was to understand the completeness of sex and gender fields in electronic health record (EHR) data and patient-level factors associated with completeness of those fields. In doing so, we aimed to inform approaches to EHR sex and gender data collection. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using 2016-2021 deidentified EHR data from a large health care system. Our sample included adults who had an encounter at any of three hospitals within the health care system or were enrolled in the health care system's Accountable Care Organization. The sex and gender fields of interest were gender identity, sex assigned at birth (SAB), and legal sex. Patient characteristics included demographics, clinical features, and health care utilization. Results: In the final study sample (N = 3,473,123), gender identity, SAB, and legal sex (required for system registration) were missing for 75.4%, 75.8%, and 0.1% of individuals, respectively. Several demographic and clinical factors were associated with having complete gender identity and SAB. Notably, the odds of having complete gender identity and SAB were greater among individuals with an activated patient portal (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.66-2.70) and with more outpatient visits (OR = 4.34; 95% CI = 4.29-4.38 for 5+ visits); odds of completeness were lower among those with any urgent care visits (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.78-0.82). Conclusions: Missingness of sex and gender data in the EHR was high and associated with a range of patient factors. Key features associated with completeness highlight multiple opportunities for intervention with a focus on patient portal use, primary care provider reporting, and urgent care settings.

10.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 316: 1612-1616, 2024 Aug 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39176519

RESUMEN

This longitudinal, non-randomized, retrospective study uses the Kaplan-Meier estimates method and the Cox Proportional Hazard model to assess the risk of home support recipients' transitioning to a higher level of care after being hospitalized. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that 50% of home support recipients were expected to move on to a higher level of care by day 1,374. The Cox Proportional Hazard model indicated that the risk of transitioning to a higher level of care increases by about 2% as a client ages by one year, and by about 10% if there were no emergency room visits in the last 12 months. Also, the risk will decrease by about 13% if an individual is getting more than one hour of home support service per visit on average, compared to those who are receiving less than one hour of home support services per visit. These results will help project long term home support demand and resource planning for home support and the health care system.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto
11.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 695, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164654

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is common among older adults and is associated with poor health outcomes. Medical fitness facilities provide a medically focused approach to physical fitness and can improve physical activity in their communities. This study aimed to assess the relationship between membership in the medical fitness model and all-cause mortality, health care utilization, and major adverse cardiac events in older adults. METHODS: A propensity weighted retrospective cohort study linked individuals that attended medical fitness facilities to provincial health administrative databases. Older adults who had at least 1 year of health coverage from their index date between January 1st, 2005 to December 31st 2015 were included. Controls were assigned a pseudo-index date at random based on the frequency distribution of index dates in members. Members were stratified into low frequency attenders (< 1 Weekly Visits) and regular frequency attenders (> 1 Weekly Visits). Time to event models estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) for risk of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event. Negative binomial models estimated the risk ratios (RRs) for risk of hospitalizations, outpatient primary care visits and emergency department visits. RESULTS: Among 3,029 older adult members and 91,734 controls, members had a 45% lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.50 - 0.61), 20% lower risk of hospitalizations (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75 - 0.84), and a 27% (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.66 - 0.77), lower risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event. A dose-response effect with larger risk reductions was associated with more frequent attendance as regular frequency attenders were 4% more likely to visit a general practitioner for a routine healthcare visit (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.07), but 23% less likely to visit the emergency department (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82 - 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Membership at a medical fitness facility was associated with a decreased risk of mortality, health care utilization and cardiovascular events. The medical fitness model may be an alternative approach for public health strategies to promote positive health behaviors in older adult populations.


Asunto(s)
Aptitud Física , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aptitud Física/fisiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología
12.
Hematol Oncol ; 42(5): e3300, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138851

RESUMEN

The overall prognosis of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is dismal. Only a small subgroup experiences long-term survival. The discrimination between patients who are candidates for potentially curative approaches and those who are not is crucial since - in addition to differences in terms of AML-directed treatment - different policies concerning intensive care unit (ICU) admission and involvement of specialized palliative care (SPC) seem obvious. To shed more light on characteristics, outcomes and health care utilization of older individuals with AML, we conducted an analysis comprising 107 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AML aged ≥70 years treated at an academic tertiary care center in Germany between 1 January 2015, and 31 December 2020. Median age was 75 years (range: 70-87 years); 45% of patients were female. The proportion of patients receiving intensive induction chemotherapy was 35%, 55% had low-intensity treatment and 10% did not receive AML-directed treatment or follow-up ended before treatment initiation. At least one ICU admission was documented for 47% of patients; SPC was involved in 43% of cases. Median follow-up was 199 days. The median overall survival (OS) was 2.5 months; the 1-year OS rate was 16%. Among patients who died during observation, the median proportion of time spent in the hospital between AML diagnosis and death was 56%. The most common places of death were normal wards (31%) and the ICU (28%). Patients less frequently died in a palliative care unit (14%) or at home (12%). In summary, results of the present analysis confirm the unfavorable prognosis of older patients with AML despite intensive health care utilization. Future efforts in this patient group should aim at optimizing the balance between appropriate AML-directed treatment on the one hand and health care utilization including ICU stays on the other hand.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39118575

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the association between demographic characteristics and emergency department (ED) epistaxis management and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: TriNetX US collaborative database. METHODS: Adults presenting to the ED for epistaxis were retrospectively followed for 7 days. Spanish-speaking patients were propensity score matched to English-speaking patients by demographics and medical history. Outcomes included use of nasal decongestant, nasal packing or cautery, diagnostic nasal endoscopy, endoscopic control of hemorrhage, hospital admission, and mortality. The analysis was also performed with stratification by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: Spanish-speaking patients were less likely to receive nasal packing or cautery [odds ratio, OR: 0.78; 95% confidence interval, CI: (0.68; 0.90)] or diagnostic nasal endoscopy [OR: 0.72; 95% CI: (0.52; 0.98)] compared to English-speaking patients. Black patients were more likely to receive treatment with a nasal decongestant spray [OR: 1.31; 95% CI: (1.27, 1.36)], but less likely to receive any other treatment compared to White patients. Asian patients were less likely to undergo nasal packing or cautery [OR: 0.90; 95% CI: (0.82; 0.99)], but had more ED visits [(1.37; 1.32) P < .01] compared to White patients. Hispanic patients were less likely to be admitted [OR: 0.93; 95% CI: (0.87; 0.98)], and averaged fewer ED visits [(1.27; 1.30) P = <.0001] compared to non-Hispanic patients. CONCLUSION: While demographic trends in ED epistaxis management are nuanced, our results suggest that Spanish-speaking, Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients are less likely to receive diagnostic and epistaxis control procedures. Additional research is needed to determine the etiology of these differences.

14.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 142, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39112973

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Utilization by low acuity patients contributes to emergency department (ED) crowding. Both knowledge deficits about adequate care levels and access barriers in primary care are important promoters of such presentations. Concurrently, not having a general practitioner (GP) increases the likelihood of low-acuity ED utilization. This pilot study thus investigated feasibility, acceptance, and potential effects of an ED-delivered intervention for low-acuity patients with no regular primary care provider, consisting of an educational leaflet on acute care options and an optional GP appointment scheduling service. METHODS: Low-acuity ED consulters not attached to a GP were given an information leaflet about alternative care offers for acute health problems and offered optional personal appointment scheduling at a local GP practice. Patients were surveyed on demographics, medical characteristics, health care utilization, valuation of the intervention, and reasons for not being attached to a GP and visiting the ED. A follow-up survey was conducted after twelve months. Trends in health and health care utilization were evaluated. RESULTS: Between December 2020 and April 2022, n = 160 patients were enrolled, n = 114 were followed up. The study population was characterized by young age (mean 30.6 years) and predominantly good general health. Besides good health, personal mobility was a central reason for not being attached to a GP, but general preference for specialists and bad experiences with primary care were also mentioned. Most frequently stated motives for the ED consultation were subjective distress and anxiety, a belief in the superiority of the hospital, and access problems in primary care. The interventional offers were favorably valued, 52.5% (n = 84) accepted the GP appointment scheduling service offer. At follow-up, GP utilization had significantly increased, while there were no significant changes regarding utilization of other providers, including ED. An additional practice survey showed a 63.0% take-up rate for the appointment service. CONCLUSIONS: With this pilot study, we were able to show that a personalized appointment scheduling service seems to be a promising approach to promote GP attachment and increase primary care utilization in patients without a regular GP in a highly urbanized setting. Further larger-scale studies are needed to investigate potential quantitative effects on ED visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023480); date 2020/11/27.


Asunto(s)
Visitas a la Sala de Emergencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Citas y Horarios , Berlin , Visitas a la Sala de Emergencias/organización & administración , Visitas a la Sala de Emergencias/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 5(7): 435-442, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39119025

RESUMEN

Background: Guidelines and risk scores have sought to standardize the management of syncope in the emergency department (ED), but variation in practice remains. Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with admission for patients presenting to the ED with low-risk syncope. Methods: Our study population included adult patients in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample between 2006 and 2019 who presented to an ED with a primary diagnosis of syncope. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analyses determined the association of patient or hospital factors with admission. Reference effect measures methodology assessed the relative contributions of patient, hospital, and unmeasured hospital factors. Results: Of the 3,206,739 qualifying encounters during the study period, 804,398 (25.1%) met low-risk criteria. Of these patients, 20,260 were admitted to the hospital (2.5%). Factors associated with increased odds of admission included increasing age and weekend presentation to the hospital, while female sex, lack of medical insurance, hospital region, teaching status, and higher ED volume decile were associated with lower odds of admission. Reference effect measures methodology demonstrated that unmeasured site variability contributed the widest range of odds for admission (odds ratio [OR] 5th percentile vs 95th percentile 0.23-4.38) compared with the composite patient (OR 0.33-3.68) or hospital (OR 0.65-1.30) factors. Conclusion: Admission patterns for low-risk syncope varies widely across institutions. Unmeasured site variation contributes significantly to the variability in admission rates, suggesting which hospital a patient presents to plays a disproportionate role in admission decisions. Further guidance to reduce practice variation in syncope care in the ED is needed.

16.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 22(1): 61, 2024 Aug 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39217335

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study sought to assess socioeconomic-related inequalities in health care use among arthritis patients in China and to analyze factors associated with this disparity. METHODS: This study used data from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. 3255 arthritis patients were included. The annual per capita household expenditure was used to divide individuals into five categories. We calculated actual, need-predicted, and need-standardized distributions of health care use by socioeconomic groups among people with arthritis. The concentration index (Cl) was used to assess inequalities in health service use. Influencing factors of inequalities were measured with the decomposition method. RESULTS: The outpatient and inpatient service use rates among 3255 arthritis patients were 23.13% and 21.41%, respectively. The CIs for actual outpatient and inpatient services use were 0.0449 and 0.0985, respectively. The standardized CIs for both outpatient and inpatient services use increase (CI for outpatient services use = 0.0537; CI for inpatient services use = 0.1260), indicating the emergence of a significant pro-rich inequity. Annual per capita household expenditure was the chief positive contributor to inequity for both outpatient (104.45%) and inpatient services use (105.74%), followed by infrequently social interaction (22.60% for outpatient services use) and Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) (11.90% for inpatient services use). By contrast, UEBMI also provided a high negative contribution to outpatient services use (-15.99%). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant pro-rich inequalities in outpatient and inpatient services use among patients with arthritis, which are exacerbated by widening economic gaps. Interventions to address inequalities should start by improving the economic situation of lower socioeconomic households.

17.
Schizophr Res ; 271: 345-352, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39089102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ongoing psychiatric follow-up and medication adherence improve outcomes for patients with psychotic disorders. Due to COVID-19, outpatient care may have been disrupted, impacting healthcare utilization. METHODS: A retrospective population-wide study was conducted for adults in Manitoba, Canada. Medication adherence and healthcare utilization were examined from 2019 to 2021. The presence of a diagnosed psychotic disorder was identified in the five years before the index date in each year. The LAI and clozapine cohorts consisted of those who received at least two prescriptions in each year 180 days before the March 20th index date. The change in adherence was measured using the average Medication Possession Ratio. Healthcare utilization rates were compared using Generalized Estimating Equation models. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between LAI and clozapine discontinuation rates before and during the pandemic. In the LAI cohort, general practitioner visits decreased significantly (-3.5 %, p = 0.039) across four quarters of 2021 versus 2019. All-cause hospitalizations decreased by 16.8 % in 2020 versus 2019 (p = 0.0055), while psychiatric hospitalizations decreased by 18.7 % across four quarters in 2020 (p = 0.0052) and 13.7 % in 2021 (p = 0.0425), versus 2019 in the LAI cohort. There was a significant transition to virtual care during the first wave of COVID-19 (71 % in clozapine, 51 % in LAI cohorts). Trends in total outpatient visits and non-psychiatric hospitalizations remained stable. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 had no substantial impact on LAI and clozapine discontinuation rates for patients previously adherent. Outpatient care remained stable, with a significant proportion of visits being done virtually at the outset of the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , COVID-19 , Clozapina , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Clozapina/administración & dosificación , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Manitoba/epidemiología , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Adulto Joven
18.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 25(11): 105225, 2024 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39186949

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the relationship between frailty and avoidable hospitalization risk, and the moderating role of sociodemographic, clinical, and care-related factors. DESIGN: Longitudinal population-based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3168 community-dwelling individuals, aged ≥60 years, from the Swedish National study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K). METHODS: We operationalized physical frailty using baseline SNAC-K data (2001-2004). In line with the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare and Association of Local Authorities and Regions, avoidable hospitalizations were considered those that could have been prevented through proper and timely outpatient care and identified through the Swedish National Patient Register. Participants were followed from baseline until first avoidable hospitalization, death, drop out, institutionalization, or maximum 12 (median 7.6) years. The association between frailty and avoidable hospitalization was explored through flexible parametric survival models, with stratified analyses to investigate age, gender, education, civil status, multimorbidity, cognitive status, and informal and formal care as potential modifiers. RESULTS: The adjusted 12-year cumulative incidence of avoidable hospitalization was significantly higher for frail persons (cumulative incidence 33.2%, 95% CI 28.9%-38.1%) than for prefrail (cumulative incidence 26.6%, 95% CI 24.5%-29.0%) and nonfrail (cumulative incidence 25.2%, 95% CI 22.5%-28.3%) individuals. In addition, prefrailty [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.45] and frailty (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.47-2.50) were associated with increased avoidable hospitalization hazards. Furthermore, the association between frailty and avoidable hospitalization was stronger in older adults aged <78 years (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.99-4.91) and those with relatively fewer chronic diseases (HR 3.88, 95% CI 1.95-7.72), whereas provision of formal social care (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.77-1.72) seemed to act as a buffer. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results indicate that older community-dwelling adults with prefrailty and frailty are at increased risk of experiencing avoidable hospitalizations, highlighting a need for better care of these individuals at the outpatient level. Formal social care services and close monitoring of particularly vulnerable subgroups of frail persons may mitigate this risk.

20.
J Patient Rep Outcomes ; 8(1): 101, 2024 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39186150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals may experience a range of symptoms after the clearance of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This condition is termed long COVID (LC) or Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). Despite the appreciable number of symptoms documented to date, one key challenge remains in the robust characterization of LC outcomes. This review aimed to assess the properties, identify gaps, and provide recommendations for relevant descriptive and evaluative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM) instruments that can be used to comprehensively characterize LC. METHODS: To achieve this objective, we identified and reviewed descriptive and evaluative PROM instruments that have been developed and validated to date with people living with LC. Our review assessed their properties, identified gaps, and recommended PROMs suitable for characterizing LC. To ensure a comprehensive and robust characterization of LC, we next identified, reviewed, and selected (with the input of patient partners) PROMs associated with the most frequently reported LC symptoms. The evaluation criteria included psychometric evidence, mode of delivery, cost, and administration time. RESULTS: Traditional matrix mapping revealed Post-COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) as a choice instrument for capturing LC outcomes largely because of the comprehensive domains it covered, and the number of psychometric evidence reported in literatures. This instrument can be effectively paired with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Headache Impact Test (HIT), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ-PEM) to characterize fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression/anxiety, headache, sleeplessness, and post-exertional malaise respectively. CONCLUSION: Our paper identified appropriate PROM instruments that can effectively capture the diverse impacts of LC. By utilizing these validated instruments, we can better understand and manage LC.


Some individuals who once contracted the virus responsible for COVID-19 may continue to experience a range of symptoms persisting for more than 3 months. These symptoms include fatigue, difficulty sleeping, anxiety and difficulty breathing amongst others. This condition is known by many as Long COVID (LC). To understand the health outcomes of patients faced with this condition, standardized Patient Reported Outcome Measurement instruments (PROMs) are pivotal. PROMs are standardized questionnaires completed by patients to measure their symptoms, perceptions of health status, and/or functional well-being. In this paper, we have examined standardized instruments suitable for measuring LC outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive strength and weakness analysis of each instrument reviewed, guided by specific criteria. Based on our strength and weakness analyses, we identified several potential instruments that can be used to reports patients' outcomes concerning LC. The data collected from PROMs provides valuable insights for healthcare practitioners and policy makers, enabling the enhancement of patient-centric care and serving as an instrument for systemic transformation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , SARS-CoV-2 , Psicometría/métodos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA