RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To summerize the results of the JUMODA study (JUmeaux MODe d'Accouchement) on the planned mode of delivery of twin pregnancy and the management of second twin delivery. METHODS: JUMODA was a national observational prospective comparative study that took place between february 2014 and march 2015 in 176 french maternity units performing more than 1500 deliveries per year. Its main objectives were the comparison of neonatal and maternal morbidity according to the planned mode of delivery and the determination of the managements of second twin delivery associated with the best neonatal outcomes. To control for potential confounding factors and indication biases, statistical analyses comprized multivariate logistic regressions and matching on propensity scores. RESULTS: The JUMODA study recruited 8823 women with twin delivery at or beyond 22 weeks of gestation. For twin pregnancies with a cephalic first twin at 32 weeks of gestation and beyond, severe neonatal morbidity was higher in the planned cesarean (150/2908 (5.2 %) than in the planned vaginal delivery group (199/8922 (2.2 %), aOR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.19-2.04). Increased neonatal morbidity in the planned cesarean delivery group was explained by higher severe morbidity in neonates born preterm (aOR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.13-2.39, for deliveries between 32+0 and 34+6 weeks of gestation, aOR 2.04, 95 % CI 1.22-3.41, for deliveries between 35+0 SA and 36+6 weeks of gestation) but not in neonates born at term (aOR 1.19, 95 % CI 0.58-2.44). In comparison with planned cesarean delivery, planned vaginal delivery was not associated with increased severe neonatal morbidity in case of breech presenting first twin after 32 weeks of gestation or with decreased survival witout severe neonatal morbidity in case of delivery before 32 weeks of gestation whatever the first twin presentation. In comparison with planned vaginal delivery, planned cesarean delivery was associated with increased severe maternal morbidity only in women aged 35 and higher. Delivery of non cephalic second twin was associated with similar severe neonatal morbidity rate than delivery of cephalic second twin. Finally, in case of cephalic second twin, internal version followed by total breech extraction was associated with less cesarean for the second twin but with higher severe neonatal morbidity in case of preterm birth in comparison with pushing efforts, ocytocin perfusion and artificial rupture of membranes. CONCLUSIONS: Planned vaginal delivery is the planned mode of delivery to encourage for the majority of pregnant women with twins, whatever first twin presentation and gestational age at delivery. No management of cephalic second twin appears better than an other, its choice will rest on obstetrician preferences.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate French residents in obstetrics and gynaecology's training to internal version and breech extraction during vaginal delivery of the second twin. METHODS: A national descriptive survey conducted among 1064 residents between July and October 2014. Respondents were invited by email to specify the type of theoretical and practical training they had received, their university hospital obstetrical practices and the number of vaginal internal version and breech extraction of the second twin they had seen and performed. RESULTS: Response rate was 38.7% (n=412). Regarding the type of theoretical training, 39.8% of residents (n=164) had received the obstetrical mechanics and techniques degree; 47.6% (n=196) had got a teaching during special education classes and 29.4% (n=121) a training on mannequin. There were important differences between regions. At the end of residency, 45.6% of residents (n=36) had practiced more than five vaginal internal version and breech extraction of the second twin. CONCLUSION: Internal version and breech extraction are difficult but essential maneuvers for the management of twin delivery. The French residents in obstetrics and gynaecology's training for these maneuvers seems to be insufficient. It is necessary to improve their teaching, this teaching must also be equivalent between regions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: The vaginal management of the second twin (T2) differs throughout our country. In 2009, the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians released practice guidelines, with low-level evidence, encouraging active management of the second twin, using maneuvers with intact membrane. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our level III labour ward, these maneuvers are systematically performed when the second twin is in a breech or transverse presentation and after ruptured membranes in most cases. We studied 182 twin pregnancies with active management of the T2 at more than 28 weeks of gestation, from 1st January 1996 to 31st December 2010, by comparing the membrane status during delivery of T2. RESULTS: The results did not show any significant differences between the two groups of patients concerning the neonatal or maternal results. The technique is feasible, even by residents. Our results show that total breech extraction of the second twin with ruptured membranes is feasible, which allows for reappraisal of the national recommendations. CONCLUSION: In our practice, it is possible to actively deliver the T2 with ruptured membranes without altering maternal and fetal prognosis and thus simplifying learning for young doctors.

Asunto(s)