RESUMEN

Yalkowsky's General Solubility Equation (GSE), with its three fixed constants, is popular and easy to apply, but is not very accurate for polar, zwitterionic, or flexible molecules. This review examines the findings of a series of studies, where we have sought to come up with a better prediction model, by comparing the performances of the GSE to Abraham's Solvation Equation (ABSOLV), and Random Forest regression (RFR) machine-learning (ML) method. Large, well-curated aqueous intrinsic solubility databases are available. However, drugs may be sparsely distributed in chemical space, concentrated in clusters. Even a large database might overlook some regions. Test compounds from under-represented portions of space may be poorly predicted, as might be the case with the 'loose' set of 32 drugs in the Second Solubility Challenge (2020). There appears to be still a need for better coverage of drug space. Increasingly, current trends in predictions of solubility use calculated input descriptors, which may be an advantage for exploring properties of molecules yet to be synthesized. The risk may be that overall prediction approaches might be based on accumulated uncertainty. The increasing use of ML/AI methods can lead to accurate predictions, but such predictions may not readily suggest the strategies to pursue in selecting yet-to-be-synthesized compounds. Based on our latest findings, we recommend predictions based on both 'grouped' ABSOLV(GRP) and 'Flexible Acceptor' GSE(Φ,B) models with the provided best-fit parameters, where Φ is the Kier molecular flexibility index and B is the Abraham H-bond acceptor strength. For molecules with Φ < 11, the prudent choice is to pick the Consensus Model, the average of ABSOLV(GRP) and GSE(Φ,B). For more flexible molecules, GSE(Φ,B) is recommended.

RESUMEN

Physicochemical properties, such as solubility, are important when prioritising compounds for progression on a drug discovery project. There is limited literature around the systematic effects of core changes on thermodynamic solubility. This work details the synthesis of nitrogen containing 6,5-bicyclic heterocyclic cores which are common scaffolds in medicinal chemistry and the analysis of their physicochemical properties, particularly, thermodynamic solubility. Crystalline solids were obtained where possible to enable a robust comparison of the thermodynamic solubility. Other parameters such as pKa, melting point and lipophilicity were also measured to determine the key factors affecting the observed solubility.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study describes a novel nonlinear variant of the well-known Yalkowsky general solubility equation (GSE). The modified equation can be trained with small molecules, mostly from the Lipinski Rule of 5 (Ro5) chemical space, to predict the intrinsic aqueous solubility, S0, of large molecules (MW > 800 Da) from beyond the rule of 5 (bRo5) space, to an accuracy almost equal to that of a recently described random forest regression (RFR) machine learning analysis. The new approach replaces the GSE constant factors in the intercept (0.5), the octanol-water log P (-1.0), and melting point, mp (-0.01) terms with simple exponential functions incorporating the sum descriptor, Φ+B (Kier Φ molecular flexibility and Abraham H-bond acceptor potential). The constants in the modified three-variable (log P, mp, Φ+B) equation were determined by partial least-squares (PLS) refinement using a small-molecule log S0 training set (n = 6541) of mostly druglike molecules. In this "flexible-acceptor" GSE(Φ,B) model, the coefficient of log P (normally fixed at -1.0) varies smoothly from -1.1 for rigid nonionizable molecules (Φ+B = 0) to -0.39 for typically flexible (Φ âˆ¼ 20, B ∼ 6) large molecules. The intercept (traditionally fixed at +0.5) varies smoothly from +1.9 for completely inflexible small molecules to -2.2 for typically flexible large molecules. The mp coefficient (-0.007) remains practically constant, near the traditional value (-0.01) for most molecules, which suggests that the small-to-large molecule continuum is mainly solvation responsive, apparently with only minor changes in the crystal lattice contributions. For a test set of 32 large molecules (e.g., cyclosporine A, gramicidin A, leuprolide, nafarelin, oxytocin, vancomycin, and mostly natural-product-derived therapeutics used in infectious/viral diseases, in immunosuppression, and in oncology) the modified equation predicted the intrinsic solubility with a root-mean-square error of 1.10 log unit, compared to 3.0 by the traditional GSE, and 1.07 by RFR.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The accurate prediction of solubility of drugs is still problematic. It was thought for a long time that shortfalls had been due the lack of high-quality solubility data from the chemical space of drugs. This study considers the quality of solubility data, particularly of ionizable drugs. A database is described, comprising 6355 entries of intrinsic solubility for 3014 different molecules, drawing on 1325 citations. In an earlier publication, many factors affecting the quality of the measurement had been discussed, and suggestions were offered to improve ways of extracting more reliable information from legacy data. Many of the suggestions have been implemented in this study. By correcting solubility for ionization (i.e., deriving intrinsic solubility, S0) and by normalizing temperature (by transforming measurements performed in the range 10-50 °C to 25 °C), it can now be estimated that the average interlaboratory reproducibility is 0.17 log unit. Empirical methods to predict solubility at best have hovered around the root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.6 log unit. Three prediction methods are compared here: (a) Yalkowsky's general solubility equation (GSE), (b) Abraham solvation equation (ABSOLV), and (c) Random Forest regression (RFR) statistical machine learning. The latter two methods were trained using the new database. The RFR method outperforms the other two models, as anticipated. However, the ability to predict the solubility of drugs to the level of the quality of data is still out of reach. The data quality is not the limiting factor in prediction. The statistical machine learning methodologies are probably up to the task. Possibly what's missing are solubility data from a few sparsely-covered chemical space of drugs (particularly of research compounds). Also, new descriptors which can better differentiate the factors affecting solubility between molecules could be critical for narrowing the gap between the accuracy of the prediction models and that of the experimental data.

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to explore to what extent small molecules (mostly from the Rule of 5 chemical space) can be used to predict the intrinsic aqueous solubility, S0, of big molecules from beyond the Rule of 5 (bRo5) space. It was demonstrated that the General Solubility Equation (GSE) and the Abraham Solvation Equation (ABSOLV) underpredict solubility in systematic but slightly ways. The Random Forest regression (RFR) method predicts solubility more accurately, albeit in the manner of a 'black box.' It was discovered that the GSE improves considerably in the case of big molecules when the coefficient of the log P term (octanol-water partition coefficient) in the equation is set to -0.4 instead of the traditional -1 value. The traditional GSE underpredicts solubility for molecules with experimental S0 < 50 µM. In contrast, the ABSOLV equation (trained with small molecules) underpredicts the solubility of big molecules in all cases tested. It was found that the errors in the ABSOLV-predicted solubilities of big molecules correlate linearly with the number of rotatable bonds, which suggests that flexibility may be an important factor in differentiating solubility of small from big molecules. Notably, most of the 31 big molecules considered have negative enthalpy of solution: these big molecules become less soluble with increasing temperature, which is compatible with 'molecular chameleon' behavior associated with intramolecular hydrogen bonding. The X-ray structures of many of these molecules reveal void spaces in their crystal lattices large enough to accommodate many water molecules when such solids are in contact with aqueous media. The water sorbed into crystals suspended in aqueous solution may enhance solubility by way of intra-lattice solute-water interactions involving the numerous H-bond acceptors in the big molecules studied. A 'Solubility Enhancement-Big Molecules' index was defined, which embodies many of the above findings.

RESUMEN

Overcoming poor solubility is a significant issue in drug discovery. The most common solution is to replace carbon atoms with polar heteroatoms such as N and O or by attaching a solubilizing appendage. This approach can lead to other issues such as poor activity and PK or the increased risk for toxicity. However, there are more subtle structural changes which can be employed that lead to an increase in solubility. These include, excising hydrophobic groups which do not efficiently contribute to binding, modifying stereo- and regiochemistry, increasing or decreasing the degree of unsaturation or adding small hydrophobic groups such as fluorine or methyl.

Asunto(s)