RESUMEN
Endoscopic suturing has been described in many applications, including the approximation of tissue defects, anchoring stents, hemostasis, and primary and secondary bariatric interventions. Primary endobariatric procedures use endoscopic suturing for gastric remodeling with the intention of weight loss. Currently, the only commercially available device in the United States is the OverStitch endoscopic suturing system (Apollo Endosurgery). We describe devices of potential that are currently in design and/or trials as devices for weight loss by gastric remodeling, including USGI incisionless operating platform used for the primary obesity surgery endoluminal 2.0 procedure, Endomina used for the Endomina endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and EndoZip.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Sutura , Humanos , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Cirugía Bariátrica/instrumentación , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Cirugía Bariátrica/tendencias , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/instrumentación , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/tendencias , Diseño de EquipoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The mainstay of treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is weight loss. Endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) are effective weight loss therapies. This study aims to assess the effect of combining EGR with GLP-1RA on liver-related outcomes and weight profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a prospectively collected registry of patients with MASLD and compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) who underwent EGR. Patients were categorized as (1) monotherapy: EGR alone and (2) combination therapy: GLP-1RA prescribed within 6 months prior to or after EGR. Outcomes included changes in noninvasive tests of hepatic fibrosis, weight profile, and insulin resistance status at 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty patients (body mass index 40.7 ± 9.3 kg/m2) were included. Of these, 12 patients (40%) underwent EGR monotherapy, and 18 patients (60%) underwent EGR + GLP-1RA combination therapy. Combination therapy group experienced greater improvements in fibrosis compared to monotherapy group (alanine aminotransferase: reduction by 55 ± 23% vs 29 ± 22% (p = 0.008), NAFLD fibrosis score: reduction by 181 ± 182% vs 30 ± 83% (p = 0.04), liver stiffness measurement on transient elastography: reduction by 54 ± 12% vs 14 ± 45% (p = 0.05)). There were greater reductions in hemoglobin A1c and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance in combination therapy compared to monotherapy (p < 0.05). At 12 months, the combination therapy group experienced 18.2 ± 6.6% TWL, while monotherapy group experienced 9.6 ± 3.3% TWL (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MASLD and cACLD, combination of EGR with GLP-1RA is associated with greater improvements in hepatic fibrosis, weight profile, and insulin resistance compared to EGR alone.