RESUMEN

We showed previously that the autocrine activation of the FGFR-mediated pathway in GIST lacking secondary KIT mutations was a result of the inhibition of KIT signaling. We show here that the FGF2/FGFR pathway regulates VEGF-A/VEGFR signaling in IM-resistant GIST cells. Indeed, recombinant FGF2 increased the production of VEGF-A by IM-naive and resistant GIST cells. VEGF-A production was also increased in KIT-inhibited GIST, whereas the neutralization of FGF2 by anti-FGF2 mAb attenuated VEGFR signaling. Of note, BGJ 398, pan FGFR inhibitor, effectively and time-dependently inhibited VEGFR signaling in IM-resistant GIST T-1R cells, thereby revealing the regulatory role of the FGFR pathway in VEGFR signaling for this particular GIST cell line. This also resulted in significant synergy between BGJ 398 and VEGFR inhibitors (i.e., sunitinib and regorafenib) by enhancing their pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative activities. The high potency of the combined use of VEGFR and FGFR inhibitors in IM-resistant GISTs was revealed by the impressive synergy scores observed for regorafenib or sunitinib and BGJ 398. Moreover, FGFR1/2 and VEGFR1/2 were co-localized in IM-resistant GIST T-1R cells, and the direct interaction between the aforementioned RTKs was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation. In contrast, IM-resistant GIST 430 cells expressed lower basal levels of FGF2 and VEGF-A. Despite the increased expression VEGFR1 and FGFR1/2 in GIST 430 cells, these RTKs were not co-localized and co-immunoprecipitated. Moreover, no synergy between FGFR and VEGFR inhibitors was observed for the IM-resistant GIST 430 cell line. Collectively, the dual targeting of FGFR and VEGFR pathways in IM-resistant GISTs is not limited to the synergistic anti-angiogenic treatment effects. The dual inhibition of FGFR and VEGFR pathways in IM-resistant GISTs potentiates the proapoptotic and anti-proliferative activities of the corresponding RTKi. Mechanistically, the FGF2-induced activation of the FGFR pathway turns on VEGFR signaling via the overproduction of VEGF-A, induces the interaction between FGFR1/2 and VEGFR1, and thereby renders cancer cells highly sensitive to the dual inhibition of the aforementioned RTKs. Thus, our data uncovers the novel mechanism of the cross-talk between the aforementioned RTKs in IM-resistant GISTs lacking secondary KIT mutations and suggests that the dual blockade of FGFR and VEGFR signaling might be an effective treatment strategy for patients with GIST-acquired IM resistance via KIT-independent mechanisms.

RESUMEN

Small bowel malignant tumors, particularly leiomyosarcomas (LMSs), are rare and challenging to diagnose due to their asymptomatic nature in the initial stages. The lack of specific symptoms makes it difficult to differentiate LMSs from other gastrointestinal tumors. This report highlights the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, treatment, and prognosis of small bowel LMSs, specifically focusing on a rare case of jejunal LMS presented in a 75-year-old man, initially suspected as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Clinical examination, laboratory investigations, imaging studies, and histopathological analysis were performed to diagnose and treat the patient. The patient underwent surgical excision of the tumor with successful recovery. The histopathological analysis confirmed a high-grade LMS, and the patient was advised on adjuvant chemotherapy for further treatment. This case report emphasizes the importance of considering small bowel LMSs in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain and highlights the challenges in diagnosing and treating these rare tumors. Early detection and appropriate management can improve the prognosis of patients with small bowel LMSs.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The course of subclinical gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is variable. The management of small GISTs is not well-defined. METHODS: Records of patients presenting with small GISTs with documented follow-up appointment at our institution between 2016 and 2022 were identified and reviewed. Comparative univariate analysis to compare patient and tumor characteristics and outcomes was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were followed for a median of 3.7 years (range 0.1-20 years). The median size at presentation was 1.7 (range 0.1-2.5) cm. A total of 51.2% (n = 44) underwent surgery before or immediately after initial presentation for pain (18.2%), bleeding (15.9%), or patient preference (6.8%). Another 17.4% (n = 15) had delayed surgery for tumor growth (40%), patient preference (2.7%), bleeding (6.7%), or pain (6.7%). The remaining 31.4% (n = 27) of patients never underwent surgery for reasons that included no growth/stability (44.4%), concomitant cancer diagnosis/treatment (29.6%), comorbidities (14.8%), and patient preference (3.7%). Patients who underwent surveillance without intervention compared with those who had delayed surgery were older (71.1 vs. 60.8 years, p < 0.001) with multiple comorbidities or a concurrent cancer diagnosis (70.3% vs. 20%, p = 0.005). There were no differences in survival or rate of distant metastases. Average time to surgery in the delayed group was 2 (range 0.1-10.3) years, and 86% of these patients underwent surgery by 5.5 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with comorbidities or concurrent cancer diagnoses, opting out of surgery does not affect survival. Conversely, younger patients, free from significant comorbidities or other diagnoses, may consider surgery or active surveillance for up to 5 years, with comparable outcomes.

RESUMEN

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been reported in patients of all ages, its diagnosis is more common in elders. The two most common types of mutation, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor a (PDGFRA) mutations, hold about 75 and 15% of GISTs cases, respectively. Tumors without KIT or PDGFRA mutations are known as wild type (WT)-GISTs, which takes up for 15% of all cases. WT-GISTs have other genetic alterations, including mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase and serine-threonine protein kinase BRAF and neurofibromatosis type 1. Other GISTs without any of the above genetic mutations are named "quadruple WT" GISTs. More types of rare mutations are being reported. These mutations or gene fusions were initially thought to be mutually exclusive in primary GISTs, but recently it has been reported that some of these rare mutations coexist with KIT or PDGFRA mutations. The treatment and management differ according to molecular subtypes of GISTs. Especially for patients with late-stage tumors, developing a personalized chemotherapy regimen based on mutation status is of great help to improve patient survival and quality of life. At present, imatinib mesylate is an effective first-line drug for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic recurrent GISTs, but how to overcome drug resistance is still an important clinical problem. The effectiveness of other drugs is being further evaluated. The progress in the study of relevant mechanisms also provides the possibility to develop new targets or new drugs.

RESUMEN

Background: Accurately and promptly predicting the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) to targeted therapy is essential for optimizing treatment strategies. However, some fractions of recurrent or metastatic GISTs present as non-FDG-avid lesions, limiting the value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) in treatment evaluation. This study evaluated the efficacy of [18F]F-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-42 [18F]FAPI-42) PET/CT for assessing the treatment response in recurrent or metastatic GISTs, in comparison to [18F]FDG PET/CT and explores a model integrating PET/CT imaging and clinical parameters to optimize the clinical use of these diagnostic tools. Methods: Our retrospective analysis included 27 patients with recurrent or metastatic GISTs who underwent [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT at baseline before switching targeted therapy. Treatment response status was divided into a progression group (PG) and a non-progression group (NPG) based on the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, according to the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan at six months. [18F]FAPI-42 and [18F]FDG PET/CT parameters including the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), the standard uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak), the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-blood pool SUV ratio (TBR), tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV)/FAPI-positive tumor volume (GTV-FAPI), total lesion glycolysis (TLG)/FAPI-positive total lesion accumulation (TLF) were correlated with the response status to identify indicative of treatment response. The predictive performance of them was quantified by generating receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), calibration curves, and cross-validation. Results: A total of 110 lesions were identified in 27 patients. Compared with PG, NPG was associated with lower levels of TBR and SUVmean in FDG PET/CT (TBR-FDG, SUVmean-FDG; P=0.033 and P=0.038, respectively), with higher SULpeak and TLF in FAPI PET/CT (SULpeak-FAPI, TLF-FAPI; P=0.10 and P=0.049, respectively). The predictive power of a composite-parameter model, including TBR-FDG, SULpeak-FAPI, gene mutation, and type of targeted therapy [area under the curve (AUC) =0.865], was superior to the few-parameter models incorporating TBR-FDG (AUC =0.637, P<0.001), SULpeak-FAPI (AUC =0.665, P<0.001) or both (AUC =0.721, P<0.001). Conclusions: Both [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT have value in predicting the treatment response of recurrent or metastatic GISTs. And [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT offers synergistic value when used in combination with [18F]FDG PET/CT. Notably, the nomogram generated from the model incorporating [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT, [18F]FDG PET/CT parameters, gene mutation, and type of targeted therapy could yield more precise predictions of the response of recurrent metastatic GISTs.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Zinc finger SWIM-type containing 4 (ZSWIM4) is a zinc finger protein with its function largely uncharacterized. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of ZSWIM4 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). RESULTS: We found that ZSWIM4 expression is inhibited by the predominantly mutated protein KIT in GISTs, while conversely, ZSWIM4 inhibits KIT expression and downstream signaling. Consistent with the observation, ZSWIM4 inhibited GIST cell survival and proliferation in vitro. RNA sequencing of GISTs from KITV558A/WT mice and KITV558A/WT/ZSWIM4-/- mice showed that loss of ZSWIM4 expression increases the expression of circadian clock pathway member BMAL1 which contributes to GIST cell survival and proliferation. In addition, we found that KIT signaling increases the distribution of ZSWIM4 in the nucleus of GIST cells, and which is important for its inhibition of KIT and BMAL1. In agreement with the results in vitro, the in vivo studies showed that ZSWIM4 deficiency increases the tumorigenesis of GISTs in KITV558A/WT mice. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results revealed that the entry of ZSWIM4 to the nucleus is important for its inhibition of KIT and BMAL1, ultimately attenuating GIST tumorigenesis. The results provide a novel insight in the understanding of signal transduction in GISTs and lay strong theoretical basis for the advancement of GIST treatment.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to clinical diagnosis. Although AI has already been developed for gastrointestinal (GI) tract endoscopy, few studies have applied AI to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images. In this study, we used a computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system with deep learning analysis of EUS images (EUS-CAD) and assessed its ability to differentiate GI stromal tumors (GISTs) from other mesenchymal tumors and their risk classification performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 101 pathologically confirmed cases of subepithelial lesions (SELs) arising from the muscularis propria layer, including 69 GISTs, 17 leiomyomas and 15 schwannomas, were examined. A total of 3283 EUS images were used for training and five-fold-cross-validation, and 827 images were independently tested for diagnosing GISTs. For the risk classification of 69 GISTs, including very-low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk GISTs, 2,784 EUS images were used for training and three-fold-cross-validation. RESULTS: For the differential diagnostic performance of GIST among all SELs, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 80.4%, 82.9%, 75.3% and 0.865, respectively, whereas those for intermediate- and high-risk GISTs were 71.8%, 70.2%, 72.0% and 0.771, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The EUS-CAD system showed a good diagnostic yield in differentiating GISTs from other mesenchymal tumors and successfully demonstrated the GIST risk classification feasibility. This system can determine whether treatment is necessary based on EUS imaging alone without the need for additional invasive examinations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown great efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), significantly prolonging the survival of patients. In the era of imatinib, a few studies reported some prognostic factors for patients with advanced GISTs, such as age, sex, performance status, diameter of the largest lesions, KIT exon mutations, and some hematological examination results. However, with the advent of more TKIs, the prognostic factors for patients with advanced GISTs have not been fully understood in the era of multiple TKIs. In this study, we aimed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with the survival of patients diagnosed with advanced GISTs. Methods: Data on clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment approaches, and survival were retrospectively collected for patients with primary unresectable or recurrent GISTs treated from January 2010 to July 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify independent prognostic factors of survival. Results: A total of 194 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up duration was 59.9 months (range, 2.7-141.7 months). The median overall survival (mOS) in this cohort was 76.5 months (95% confidence interval, 63.4 to 89.6 months). All patients received TKI therapy during the follow-up period, and 56.2% received two or more types of TKIs. In multivariable Cox analysis, younger age, a single lesion at enrollment, no previous use of TKIs, smaller tumor burden, good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS ≤1), and lesions limited to the liver were independent prognostic factors for better survival. Conclusions: We found that a single lesion at enrollment, no previous use of TKIs, a smaller tumor burden, and lesions limited to the liver were associated with better survival. Drug resistance is a severe challenge for advanced GISTs, and several factors mentioned above may be correlated with the development of drug resistance, leading to the poor survival of patients.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Cutaneous leiomyomas, benign tumors from smooth muscle fibers, constitute about 5 % of all leiomyomas. They exhibit diverse inheritance patterns and can be linked to systemic malignancies. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal, are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Despite their prevalence, simultaneous occurrences of cutaneous leiomyomas and GISTs are rare, necessitating exploration of their potential relationship. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old male with no significant medical history presented with multiple painful erythematous nodules on his chest, upper back, and arms. Histopathological analysis diagnosed these as multiple cutaneous piloleiomyomatosis. Despite recommendations for surgical intervention, the patient chose medical management and experienced significant pain relief with nifedipine. Later, the development of abdominal symptoms led to the discovery of multiple gastric lesions, diagnosed as benign spindle cell neoplasms, necessitating partial gastrectomy. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The differential diagnosis of cutaneous leiomyomas includes various soft tissue tumors, requiring histopathological confirmation. Genetic mutations affecting proteins critical to cellular energy production and tumor suppression underlie these conditions. Treatment options include pharmacological management and surgical excision. The discovery of GISTs in this patient aligns with rare literature reports, emphasizing the need for vigilant evaluation of systemic malignancies in patients with leiomyomatosis. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the potential of cutaneous leiomyomas to indicate deeper malignancies like GISTs, stressing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in diagnosis and treatment. It underscores the interconnectedness of benign dermatological conditions and internal malignancies, advocating for comprehensive evaluation in patients with leiomyomatosis. METHODS: This case report meticulously follows the SCARE 2023 guidelines: updating consensus Surgical Case Report guidelines (Sohrabi et al., 2023 [1]). These guidelines ensure high-quality reporting in surgical case reports. The report details the evaluation, diagnosis, and a comprehensive review of the literature pertaining to a patient with multiple leiomyoma cutis associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. By employing a multidisciplinary approach, this report achieves a thorough and standardized presentation of the case, serving as an additional tool for raising awareness regarding such rare conditions.

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) predominantly develop in the stomach. While nomogram offer tremendous therapeutic promise, there is yet no ideal nomogram comparison customized specifically for handling categorical data and model selection related gastric GISTs. (1) We selected 5463 patients with gastric GISTs from the SEER Research Plus database spanning from 2000 to 2020; (2) We proposed an advanced missing data imputation algorithm specifically designed for categorical variables; (3) We constructed five Cox nomogram models, each employing distinct methods for the selection and modeling of categorical variables, including Cox (Two-Stage), Lasso-Cox, Ridge-Cox, Elastic Net-Cox, and Cox With Lasso; (4) We conducted a comprehensive comparison of both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) tasks at six different time points; (5) To ensure robustness, we performed 50 randomized splits for each task, maintaining a 7:3 ratio between the training and test cohorts with no discernible statistical differences. Among the five models, the Cox (Two-Stage) nomogram contains the fewest features. Notably, at Near-term, Mid-term, and Long-term intervals, the Cox (Two-Stage) model attains the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC), top-1 ratio, and top-3 ratio in both OS and CSS tasks. For the prediction of survival in patients with gastric GISTs, the Cox (Two-Stage) nomogram stands as a simple, stable, and accurate predictive model with substantial promise for clinical application. To enhance the clinical utility and accessibility of our findings, we have deployed the nomogram model online, allowing healthcare professionals and researchers worldwide to access and utilize this predictive tool.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many studies of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (g-GISTs) following endoscopic resection (ER) have typically focused on tumor size, with most tumors at low risk of aggressiveness after risk stratification. There have been few systematic studies on the oncologic outcomes of intermediate- or high-risk g-GISTs after ER. METHODS: From January 2014 to January 2020, we retrospectively collected patients considered at intermediate- or high-risk of g-GISTs according to the modified NIH consensus classification system. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy nine (679) consecutive patients were diagnosed with g-GISTs and treated by ER between January 2014 and January 2020 in three hospitals in Shanghai, China. 43 patients (20 males and 23 females) were confirmed at intermediate-or high-risk. The mean size of tumors was 2.23 ± 1.01 cm. The median follow-up period was 62.02 ± 15.34 months, with a range of 28 to 105 months. There were no recurrences or metastases, even among patients having R1 resections. The 5-year OS rate was 97.4% (42/43). CONCLUSION: ER for intermediate- or high-risk gastric small GISTs is a feasible and safe method, which allows for a wait-and-see approach before determining the necessity for imatinib adjuvant or surgical treatment. This approach to g-GISTs does require that patients undergo close follow-up.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Typically, GISTs are solitary; however, in rare cases, they may be multiple and appear in one or more organs. Multiple GISTs can appear in familial GISTs, children, or certain tumor syndromes such as neurofibromatosis type 1, Carney syndrome, and Carney-Stratakis syndrome. However, the diagnosis of primary multiple sporadic GISTs is often more difficult than that of these diseases. Herein, we report a case of multiple primary sporadic GISTs in a 64-year-old man, affecting the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneum, as identified through dual-time point positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Notably, the dual-time-point PET/CT revealed the migration of masses near the lower abdomen into the abdominal cavity. Furthermore, a significant increase in radioactive uptake of the mass 3 h after 18F-FDG injection compared with that 1 h after injection may be an important cue for its diagnosis.

RESUMEN

Evidence suggests that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a pivotal role in the carcinogenesis and progression of various human malignancies including gastrointestinal malignancies. This comprehensive review reports the functions and mechanisms of the lncRNA maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3) involved in gastrointestinal malignancies. It summarizes its roles in mediating the regulation of cellular proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasiveness, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and drug resistance in several gastrointestinal cancers such as colorectal cancer, gall bladder cancer, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and most importantly, hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, the authors briefly highlight its implicated mechanistic role and interactions with different non-coding RNAs and oncogenic signaling cascades. This review presents the rationale for developing non coding RNA-based anticancer therapy via harnessing the power of MEG3 in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: The role of cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (mGISTs) responding to imatinib (IM) has not yet been established. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of patients with mGISTs in two Russian cancer centers. We compared two cohorts: treated (Group S) or not treated with surgery (Group NS) after a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) while on IM. Methods: A total 44 patients treated by IM as first line treatment were included in our analysis. Prognostically similar patients only sensitive to IM cases with hepatic or peritoneal metastases as well as durable response to IM lasting more than 12 months were included in a control arm. Patients in Group NS received only IM until disease progression. Patients in Group S were treated additionally with metastasectomy after having response or SD on IM. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with several trends: a higher proportion of patients achieved a PR in Group S (87% vs. 55%, P=0.165), and greater number of patients had peritoneal metastases in Group NS (45% vs. 27%, P=0.759). The median time to surgery from the initiation of IM was 8 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in Group S than Group NS: the median PFS was 78 vs. 35 months (P=0.088); the median OS was 141 vs. 80 months (P=0.154). Conclusions: The surgical resection of residual lesions after disease control with IM is likely to be beneficial to patients with mGISTs.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of small gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria layer (SMT-MPs) remains a subject of debate. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently considered the optimal treatment for resection. However, high expenses, complex procedures, and the risk of complications have limited its application. Our previously proposed novel operation, precutting endoscopic band ligation (precutting EBL), has been demonstrated in a long-term, single-arm study to be an effective and safe technique for removing small gastric SMTs. However, the absence of a pathological examination and the potential for delayed perforation have raised concerns. Thus, we modified the precutting EBL by adding endoscopic resection to the snare after ligation and closure, yielding the precutting endoscopic band ligation-assisted resection (precutting EBLR). Moreover, the initial pilot study confirmed the safety and efficacy of the proposed approach and we planned a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to further validate its clinical feasibility. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, open-label, parallel group, and randomized controlled trial. Approximately 40 patients with SMT-MPs will be included in this trial. The patients included were allocated to two groups: ESD and precutting EBLR. The basic clinical data of the patients were collected in detail. To better quantify the difference between ESD and precutting EBLR, the primary outcome was set as the operation duration. The secondary outcomes included total operation cost and hospitalization, intraoperative adverse events, and postoperative recurrence. The primary outcome was tested for superiority, while the secondary outcomes were tested for noninferiority. SPSS is commonly used for statistical analysis. DISCUSSION: This study was designed to validate the feasibility of a novel operation for removing gastric SMT-MPs. To intuitively assess this phenomenon, the operation durations of precutting EBLR and ESD were compared, and other outcomes were also recorded comprehensively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200065473 . Registered on November 5, 2022.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are neoplastic lesions that primarily affect the digestive tract and develop from interstitial cells of Cajal. Due to their malignant potential and personalized treatment, these lesions require histopathologic and immunohistochemical characterization. In this investigation, the sex, age, lesional sites of origin, histopathologic types, the prevalence of HER-2 expression, prognostic indices (based on tumour size and mitotic figures), expression of CD117 and DOG1, and characteristics of patients with GIST were all characterized. Methodology: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of GIST cases seen at four tertiary healthcare centers in Nigeria over ten years (2008 to 2017) and investigated utilizing histopathological and immunohistochemical (CD117, DOG1, and HER-2) methods. Result: In this study, there were twenty GIST cases. Notably, the majority (40%) of the cases had tumours with sizes between 7.0 and 8.0, the stomach was the most frequent site (70%) and the spindle cell type of GIST was the most prevalent (80%) histopathological type. Additionally, the stomach was significantly associated with GIST as an origin site (with a P value of 0.001), and 100% and 50% of these tumours were immunoreactive with CD117 and DOG1 respectively. Finally, HER-2 immunoreactivity was negatively stained with GIST tumour. Conclusion: In our study, GISTs most frequently develop in the stomach, and CD117& DOG1 are essential for correctly diagnosing these tumours. However, HER-2 immunoreactivity is a predictive marker of survival for personalized care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We showed previously that inhibition of KIT signaling in GISTs activates FGFR-signaling pathway rendering cancer cells resistant to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKi) imatinib mesylate (IM) (Gleevec) despite of absence of secondary KIT mutations and thereby illustrating a rationale for the combined (e.g., KIT- and FGFR-targeted) therapies. We show here that long-term culture of IM-resistant GISTs (GIST-R1) with IM substantially down-regulates KIT expression and induces activation of the FGFR-signaling cascade, evidenced by increased expression of total and phosphorylated forms of FGFR1 and 2, FGF-2, and FRS-2, the well-known adaptor protein of the FGF-signaling cascade. This resulted in activation of both AKT- and MAPK-signaling pathways shown on mRNA and protein levels, and rendered cancer cells highly sensitive to pan-FGFR-inhibitors (BGJ 398, AZD 4547, and TAS-120). Indeed, we observed a significant decrease of IC50 values for BGJ 398 in the GIST subclone (GIST-R2) derived from GIST-R1 cells continuously treated with IM for up to 12 months. An increased sensitivity of GIST-R2 cells to FGFR inhibition was also revealed on the xenograft models, illustrating a substantial (>70%) decrease in tumor size in BGJ 398-treated animals when treated with this pan-FGFR inhibitor. Similarly, an increased intra-tumoral apoptosis as detected by immunohistochemical (IHC)-staining for cleaved caspase-3 on day 5 of the treatment was found. As expected, both BGJ 398 and IM used alone lacked the pro-apoptotic and growth-inhibitory activities on GIST-R1 xenografts, thereby revealing their resistance to these TKis when used alone. Important, the knockdown of FGFR2, and, in much less content, FGF-2, abrogated BGJ 398's activity against GIST-R2 cells both in vitro and in vivo, thereby illustrating the FGF-2/FGFR2-signaling axis in IM-resistant GISTs as a primary molecular target for this RTKi. Collectively, our data illustrates that continuous inhibition of KIT signaling in IM-resistant GISTs lacking secondary KIT mutations induced clonal heterogeneity of GISTs and resulted in accumulation of cancer cells with overexpressed FGF-2 and FGFR1/2, thereby leading to activation of FGFR-signaling. This in turn rendered these cells extremely sensitive to the pan-FGFR inhibitors used in combination with IM, or even alone, and suggests a rationale to re-evaluate the effectiveness of FGFR-inhibitors in order to improve the second-line therapeutic strategies for selected subgroups of GIST patients (e.g., IM-resistant GISTs lacking secondary KIT mutations and exhibiting the activation of the FGFR-signaling pathway).

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare gastrointestinal neoplasms. We are presenting a 57-year-old female patient with a GIST of considerable dimensions that was deemed unresectable during the initial intervention. The patient had a previous surgical record of a peritoneal sarcomatosis tumor that covered approximately 50% of the abdominal cavity. The patient underwent surgical procedures, including exploratory laparotomy, lumpectomy, splenectomy, proximal gastrectomy, esophagogastric anastomosis, pyloroplasty, jejunostomy, and left diaphragm plasty. One of the observed results was the presence of a 50×40 cm exophytic multilobed cerebroid-like tumor in the abdomen region, specifically dependent on the gastric fundus. The primary treatment for patients without metastases is surgical removal of the tumor, with wedge resection being recommended for the preservation of organ function and quality of life postoperatively.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) that represent approximately 1 to 2 percent of primary gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Owing to their rarity, very little is known about their overall epidemiology, and the prognostic factors of their pathology. The current study aimed to evaluate the independent determinants of mortality in patients diagnosed with GISTs over the past decade. METHODS: Our study comprised 2374 patients diagnosed with GISTs from 2000 to 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We analyzed the baseline characteristics, and overall mortality (OM), as well as the cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of GISTs. Variables with a p value < 0.01 in the univariate Cox regression were incorporated into the multivariate Cox model, to determine the independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses of factors affecting the all-cause mortality and GIST-related mortality among US patients between 2010 and 2017 revealed a higher overall mortality in non-Hispanic Black patients (HR = 1.516, 95% CI 1.172-1.961, p = 0.002), patients aged 80+ (HR = 9.783, 95% CI 4.185-22.868, p = 0), followed by those aged 60-79 (HR = 3.408, 95% CI 1.488-7.807, p = 0.004); male patients (HR = 1.795, 95% CI 1.461-2.206, p < 0.001); patients with advanced disease with distant metastasis (HR = 3.865, 95% CI 2.977-5.019, p < 0.001), followed by cases with regional involvement via both direct extension and lymph node involvement (HR = 3.853, 95% CI 1.551-9.57, p = 0.004); and widowed patients (HR = 1.975, 95% CI 1.494-2.61, p < 0.001), followed by single patients (HR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.154-2.028, p = 0.003). The highest CSM was observed in the same groups, except widowed patients and patients aged 60-79. The highest CSM was also observed among patients that underwent chemotherapy (HR = 1.687, 95% CI 1.19-2.392, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In this updated study on the outcomes of patients with GISTs, we found that non-Hispanic Black patients, male patients, and patients older than 60 years have a higher mortality with GISTs. Furthermore, patients who have received chemotherapy have a higher GIST-specific mortality, and married patients have a lower mortality. However, we do not know to what extent these independent prognostic factors interact with each other to influence mortality. This study paves the way for future studies addressing these interactions. The results of this study may help treating clinicians to identify patient populations associated with a dismal prognosis, as those may require closer follow-up and more intensive therapy; furthermore, with married patients having a better survival rate, we hope to encourage clinicians to involve family members of the affected patients early in the disease course, as the social support might impact the prognosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) of the breast and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare benign (primarily) tumors observed in the breast and gastrointestinal tract, respectively. The coexistence of both of these rare tumors is extremely rare; therefore, the author describes the clinical presentation and pathophysiological findings of such a unique case in this study. A 56-year-old female patient with no medical history presented with a substantial right breast lump, severe nausea, and vomiting, and suffered from iron deficiency anemia. Radiological observation and a right breast excisional biopsy diagnosed the patient with AME associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Endoscopy and a CT scan of the stomach revealed the existence of GIST. This is the first reported case of concurrence of a huge mass of AME and GIST in a patient. Histological and immunohistochemistry tests using p63, SMA, calponin, and Ki67 markers for the breast tumor and DOG-1, CD34, and CD117 markers for the gastric tumor revealed the non-invasive benign state. The patient had a right breast mastectomy with a negative resection margin. AME of the breast and GIST pose diagnostic challenges due to their erratic morphological characteristics and can cause misinterpretation drawn solely from radiological tests. Effective and accurate diagnostics require assessing the histological and immunohistochemistry findings of the tumor to identify the invasiveness of the neoplasm and the associated risk levels. This report, thus, creates awareness among clinicians and pathologists for the consideration of such possibilities and, therefore, conducts the necessary diagnostics and prophylactic treatments.