RESUMEN
PURPOSES: To explore the clinical feasibility and efficacy of a deep inspiration breath-hold (BH) PET/CT using [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 on upper abdominal lesions in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent a free-breath (FB) whole-body PET/CT, including a 10 min/bed scan for the upper abdomen with a vital signal monitoring for respiratory gating (RG) followed by a 20-second BH PET/CT covering the same axial range. For the upper abdomen bed, the following PET series was reconstructed: a 2-min FB PET; RG PET (6 bins); a 20-second and 15-second BH PET (BH_15 and BH_20). Semi-quantitative analysis was performed to compare liver SUVmean, lesion SUVmax, MTV, its percentage difference and target-to-background ratio (TBR) between both BH PET and RG PET images. Subgroup analysis considered lesion location, MTV and SUVmax. A 5-point Likert scale was used to perform visual analysis and any missed or additional lesions were identified compared with RG PET. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis on overall lesions (n = 78) revealed higher SUVmax and TBR, and smaller MTV for both BH PET compared to FB and RG PET, with lesion location-specific variations. Neither significant difference was observed in all metrics between RG and FB PET in larger lesions, nor in MTV in lower-uptake lesions. However, both BH PET significantly enhanced these measurements. In the visual analysis, both BH PET showed noninferior performance to RG PET, and were evaluated clinically acceptable. Additional and missed lesions were observed in FB and both BH PET compared with RG PET, but didn't alter the clinical management. The BH_15 PET showed comparable performance to BH_20 PET in any comparison. CONCLUSION: The BH PET/CT using [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 is effective in detecting upper abdominal lesions, offering more accurate quantitative measurements. Using a novel PET/CT scanner, a 15-second BH PET can provide comparable and superior performance to RG PET, indicating potential feasibility in clinical routines.
RESUMEN
Objective To explore the dosimetric differences between abdominal deep inspiration breath hold(ADIBH)mode and free breath(FB)mode in intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)for left breast cancer.Methods From July 2022 to May 2023,a total of 22 patients who needed adjuvant radiation therapy after left breast cancer surgery in the hospital were selected as the research objects.The simulated computed tomography(CT)positioning images of ADIBH and FB modes were collected,the planned target volume(PTV)and endangered organs were outlined,the IMRT plan was designed,and the dosimetric param-eters of the two modes were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the mean dose(Dmean),homogeneity index(HI)and conformity index(CI)of PTV between the ADIBH and the FB modes(P＞0.05).Compared with the FB mode,the heart Dmean,V5,V10,V20,V30 and V40 in the ADIBH mode decreased by 2.95 Gy,12.21％,8.26％,6.56％,5.41％and 3.48％,respectively,and the left anterior descending(LAD)coronary artery Dmean,maximum dose(Dmax),minimum dose(Dmin)and V40 decreased by 15.99 Gy,16.10 Gy,0.82 Gy and 13.73％,respectively,with statistical significance(P＜0.05).Compared with the FB mode,the dose and volume of heart irradiation in the ADIBH mode at the same level were significantly reduced.Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between heart Dmean and LAD Dmean in the ADIBH mode(r=0.72),and between heart Dmean and LAD Dmean in the FB mode(r=0.69).Compared with the FB mode,the left lung Dmean of the ADIBH mode decreased by 0.99 Gy,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).However,there was no significant difference in left lung V5,right lung Dmean and right breast Dmean between the two breathing modes(P＞0.05).Conclusion ADIBH mode can effectively reduce the dose to the heart and LAD,and play a good protective role.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the displacements of the clips in the cavity measured with orthagonal kilovoltage (KV) X-my plain film in conditions of moderate deep inspiration breathing hold(mDIBH) and free breath (FB), and compare the margins from clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) based on the displacements. Methods Before radiotherapy, 2 and 5 sets of orthogonal KV plain film were respectively collected in mDIBH and FB group, then the automatic registration of the reconstructed KV plain film and DRR derived from the planning OF images was finished. In conditions of mDIBH and FB, the displacements of the selected clip at the same location in the different directions and of the different selected clips in the same direction were compared. The margins in three dimensional directions were calculated and compared in conditions of mDIBH and FB . Results In FB hold group, the difference of displacement in left-right (LR), cranial-caudal (CC) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were statistically significant between the clips at the cranial and caudal border of the cavity (9. 7 mm and 10. 6 nun (Z = -2. 12,P =0. 037) ,7. 3 mm and 8. 3 mm (Z = -2. 31 ,P=0. 041) ,15.5 mm and 16. 1 nun (Z = -2. 32,P = 0. 041)), but not statistically significant for the clips at the bottom and lateral P=0.814),15.7 mm and 16.5 mm (Z=-0.26,P=0.856)). The corresponding differences in the different directions were statistically significant (5.0 mm and 7. 8 mm(Z = -2. 31, P =0. 036), 5.0 mm and 9. 3 nun (Z= -2. 21,P=0. 021),7. 8 mm and9.3 mm (Z= -2. 11,P=0.041)). In FB group, the differences of the displacements of the four selected clips were statistically significant in CC and AP directions (7.3 mm and 8.4 mm (Z= -2.45,P=0.021), 15.5 mm and 16.5 mm (Z= -2.41,P= 0.043)), but not in LF direction (10.6 nun and 10.6 mm (Z= -0.24,P=0. 815)). In mDIBH group, the displacements in LF direction were statistically significant (4. 4 mm and 5.4 mm (Z = -2. 31, P = O. 031)), but not in CC and AP directions (8. 6 mm and 8.6 mm (Z =-0. 21, P = 0. 815), 10. 5 mm and 10. 8 mm (Z = -0. 27 ,P =0. 754)). There were statistically significant difference of the margins in LF and AP directions (9.7 mm and 5.0 mm (Z= -2.34,P=0.029),15.5 mm and 9.3 mm (Z= -2. 31,P= 0.021)), but not in CC direction (7.3 mm and 7. 8 mm (Z= -0.29,P =0.770)) between mDIBH and FB conditions. Conclusions The margins extended from CTV to PTV for EBPBI should be determined based on the respiratory status, border location and border direction.