RESUMEN
Fractional laser therapy improves skin texture, range of motion, and quality of life for patients with traumatic scars. Nevertheless, anecdotal evidence suggests declining insurance coverage for laser therapy. We aimed to characterize the landscape of insurance coverage for fractional laser therapy present our six-year reimbursement trends. We cross-sectionally analyzed the 60 largest American health insurers by enrollee size and market share. For each, we identified their laser therapy policy for scar revision and extracted their documentation, prior, and continuing authorization requirements and treatment guidelines. We also collected retrospective institutional claims data from 2017 to 2022 to investigate trends in reimbursement. Of the 60 largest health insurers, we identified 11 (18.3%) policies on scar revision and 40 policies (66.7%) on reconstructive surgery, including scar revision. Nineteen policies considered laser therapy medically necessary with evidence of functional impairment refractory to prior treatment. Three insurers denied laser coverage under any circumstance. Of the 1,531 claims submitted by our institution for burn scar laser therapy, 13.8% were denied. Patients with Medicare (ORadj, 3.78) or Medicaid (ORadj, 2.80) had significantly greater odds of coverage than privately insured patients (p<0.01). There was a 14.5% annual reduction in the odds of reimbursement during the study period (ORadj, 0.86, p < 0.01). Laser therapy is a powerful treatment that is not widely available to patients with traumatic scars. Our institutional data suggest this access may be further eclipsed by decreasing trends in coverage since 2017. Strategies are needed to protect patient access to this life-changing treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of CO2 fractional laser and microneedling pretreatment combined with ALA-PDT for moderate-to-severe acne, aiming to optimize clinical treatment. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (CO2 fractional laser + ALA-PDT), Group B (microneedling + ALA-PDT), and Group C (ALA-PDT). Each group underwent photodynamic therapy once a week for 3 weeks. Efficacy was assessed at the end of the 4th week, and recurrence was assessed at the end of the 12th week. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients with moderate to severe acne were included in this study, with 50 patients in each group. Four weeks after the end of treatment, the effective rates were 88 % for Group A, 62 % for Group B, and 36 % for Group C. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P < 0.05), with Group A showing superior efficacy compared to Group B (P < 0.05). No serious systemic or local adverse reactions were observed in any group. No recurrence was seen in any group 12 weeks after the end of treatment, and some patients continued to show improvement in skin lesions over time. CONCLUSION: Both the CO2 fractional laser group and the microneedling group improved the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for moderate to severe acne compared to the control group, with the CO2 fractional laser group demonstrating better efficacy and fewer adverse effects.
RESUMEN
Objective: This study provided clinical findings supporting the use of combination techniques/products and Nd:YAP 1340 nm fractional laser therapy, for soft-tissue augmentation in light- and darker-skin phototypes. Background: The face's aging process is complex and involves skin alterations, connective tissues, bone, and fat layers of the face. Methods: A total of 17 female patients were treated for wrinkles and for scars with the use of Nd:YAP 1340 nm fractional laser combined with other cosmetic therapies. The mean of 4.6(±1.9) laser treatment sessions every 1 month were performed. The combined therapy was administered every 3 months during the total course of the laser treatments. Results: The total mean improvement was 3.64(±0.49). Clinical images showed a visible aesthetic improvement. No adverse events have been reported. Conclusion: The combination therapies used have shown promise in maintaining safety and tolerability while improving patient results for the management of skin aging.
RESUMEN
Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy of CO2 fractional laser combined with compound betamethasone in treating vitiligo and its impact on inflammatory factors. Methods: The clinical treatment effects, levels of inflammatory factors [interleukin-17 (IL-17), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-10 (IL-10)], prognosis regarding repigmentation and relapse, psychological health (satisfaction). Results: â Clinical treatment effects: the total effective rate in Group A was 92.73%, Group B was 74.55%, and Group C was 67.27%, with Group A showing significantly higher effectiveness than Groups B and C (p < 0.05). â¡ Inflammatory factors: prior to treatment, there was no significant difference in IL-17, IFN-γ, and IL-10 levels among the three groups (p > 0.05); after 3 and 6 months of treatment, the levels of IL-17 and IFN-γ decreased significantly while IL-10 levels increased significantly across all three groups, with Group A showing a more pronounced change compared to Groups B and C (p < 0.05). ⢠Prognosis regarding repigmentation and relapse: after 3 and 6 months of treatment, Group A exhibited significantly higher repigmentation rates compared to Groups B and C (p < 0.05); in terms of relapse, Group A had a relapse rate of 5.45%, Group B had 21.82%, and Group C had 23.64%, with Group A showing significantly lower relapse rates compared to Groups B and C (p < 0.05). ⣠Quality of life and psychological health: at the end of the 6 month follow-up, the quality of life and psychological health of patients in Group A were significantly higher than those in Groups B and C (p < 0.05). ⤠Occurrence of adverse reactions: the incidence of adverse reactions was 12.73% in Group A, 10.91% in Group B, and 9.09% in Group C, with no significant difference observed among the three groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The application of CO2 fractional laser combined with compound betamethasone in vitiligo patients demonstrates significant efficacy. Compared to sole treatment with CO2 fractional laser or compound betamethasone injections, this combined approach further improves the levels of inflammatory factors in vitiligo patients, reduces the risk of relapse, enhances skin repigmentation, improves quality of life, psychological well-being, without increasing the risk of related adverse reactions. This combined approach merits clinical promotion and application.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fractional picosecond lasers (FPL) are reported to be effective and safe for atrophic acne scars and post-acne erythema. However, there is no evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of FPL treatment for non-acne atrophic scars and scar erythema among Chinese patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 12 Chinese patients with non-acne atrophic scars, including nine with scar erythema, were treated with one to three sessions of 1064 nm FPL treatment. Clinical improvement was objectively assessed through blinded evaluations by external physicians. A modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS) and the Clinician Erythema Assessment Scale (CEAS) were individually used to evaluate atrophic scars and scar erythema based on photographs. Physician-assessed and subject-assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) were used to assess changes before and after FPL treatment. Patient satisfaction and adverse events were also documented. RESULTS: Total mMSS scores, as well as three parameters (color, distortion, and texture), were significantly decreased after FPL treatment, with a mean reduction of 3.18 ± 1.60 in total scores (p < 0.05). The CEAS scores were significantly reduced from 2.41 ± 0.98 before treatment to 0.41 ± 0.40 at the final visit (p < 0.05). Based on physician-assessed and subject-assessed GAIS scores, 11 (91.7%) patients were improved after FPL treatment. 33.3% of patients were very satisfied, and 41.7% were satisfied. No serious, prolonged (> 3 weeks) adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that 1064 nm FPL treatment may be a promising option for non-acne atrophic scars, especially with scar erythema. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.
Asunto(s)
Cicatriz , Eritema , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Atrofia , China , Cicatriz/patología , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Eritema/etiología , Eritema/patología , Eritema/radioterapia , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Treatment of lower limb ischemia in patients with diabetes is challenging because of the location of the ulcers and the complexity of their pathogenesis. Carbon dioxide fractional laser (CO2FL) therapy in conjunction with tibial periosteum distraction could become a substitute for conventional methods. We herein describe a patient diagnosed with ischemic diabetic foot with a complex ulcer in the upper third of the tibia. Laser irradiation (Deep FX mode with 30 mJ of energy and 10% density) was applied to the entire region of skin below the knee after surface anesthesia, and this treatment was performed twice a week until the ulcer healed. Computed tomography angiography showed successful establishment of a blood supply to the back of the right foot after treatment. Skin grafting was successfully performed, with only a few wounds remaining on the foot 8 months after treatment. The pain score was significantly decreased at the last follow-up. No complications occurred. This case report provides guidance for the performance of CO2FL, a fast, easy, accurate treatment in patients with diabetes. CO2FL can target lower limb arterial occlusive disease accompanied by refractory ulcers, addressing the underlying vascular occlusion and dysfunction as well as promoting microcirculation and wound healing.
Asunto(s)
Pie Diabético , Isquemia , Láseres de Gas , Extremidad Inferior , Humanos , Pie Diabético/terapia , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Láseres de Gas/uso terapéutico , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/terapia , Masculino , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cicatrización de Heridas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ultrapluse CO2 fractional laser technology has emerged as an effective treatment for scar management. However, one drawback of this modality is the pain caused during the procedure. This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of dezocine (DZC) as preemptive analgesia for reduction of pain induced by ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment for acne scars. METHODS: The study cohort included 78 outpatients with acne scars between February and April 2023. Patients were randomly assigned into three groups with intravenous injection (iv) of DZC prior to laser treatment: (1) control, iv of saline; (2) DZC group 1 (DZC_1), iv of DZC at 0.15 mg/kg; and (3) DZC_2, iv of DZC at 0.20 mg/kg. After 30 min, one session of ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment on acne scars was performed. Hemodynamics, visual analogue scale (VAS), and anxiety visual analog test (AVAT) were monitored prior to, during, and after the procedure. RESULTS: Operative success rates for patients in the control, DZC_1, and DZC_2 groups were 34.6%, 84.6%, and 100%, respectively. DZC administered with either dosage significantly reduced the VAS and AVAT scores of patients in treatment groups as compared with the subjects in the control group during the course of ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment. Patients in DZC_1 and DZC_2 groups did not show any significant difference in hemodynamic parameters, VAS, and AVAT scores. Temporary adverse effects such as nausea and dizziness were observed in some subjects after treatment; the symptoms were quickly dissolved after a rest in supine position. CONCLUSIONS: DZC as preemptive analgesia could effectively reduce pain and anxiety induced by ultrapulse CO2 fractional laser treatment in patients. This study provided an option of preemptive anesthesia to minimize the pain and discomforts associated with laser treatments in clinical practices.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated a novel strategy for improving regenerative cartilage outcomes. It combines fractional laser treatment with the implantation of neocartilage generated from autologous dynamic Self-Regenerating Cartilage (dSRC). METHODS: dSRC was generated in vitro from harvested autologous swine chondrocytes. Culture was performed for 2, 4, 8, 10, and 12 weeks to study matrix maturation. Matrix formation and implant integration were also studied in vitro in swine cartilage discs using dSRC or cultured chondrocytes injected into CO2 laser-ablated or mechanically punched holes. Cartilage discs were cultured for up to 8 weeks, harvested, and evaluated histologically and immunohistochemically. RESULTS: The dSRC matrix was injectable by week 2, and matrices grew larger and more solid with time, generating a contiguous neocartilage matrix by week 8. Hypercellular density in dSRC at week 2 decreased over time and approached that of native cartilage by week 8. All dSRC groups exhibited high glycosaminoglycan (GAG) production, and immunohistochemical staining confirmed that the matrix was typical of normal hyaline cartilage, being rich in collagen type II. After 8 weeks in cartilage lesions in vitro, dSRC constructs generated a contiguous cartilage matrix, while isolated cultured chondrocytes exhibited only a sparse pericellular matrix. dSRC-treated lesions exhibited high GAG production compared to those treated with isolated chondrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated dSRC exhibits hyaline cartilage formation, matures over time, and generates contiguous articular cartilage matrix in fractional laser-created microenvironments in vitro, being well integrated with native cartilage.
RESUMEN
An analog PID controller-based galvanometer scanner is widely used by fractional laser medical equipment (FLME) to scan lasers across tissue surfaces, achieving the desired therapeutic effect. This type of driver, primarily composed of passive components and operational amplifiers, can only accept commands from the central controller of the FLME, with a simple hardware circuit-based fault diagnosis; thus, the safety of the FLME is compromised. To address these issues, the failure mechanisms of galvanometers and their impact on the safety of FLME are thoroughly analyzed first. Then, an adaptive limit protection method, a coil open circuit fault diagnosis, a communication timeout protection based on two handshakes, and a galvanometer control timeout protection are proposed, respectively, based on a digital driver platform, to supplement the deficiencies in the original fault diagnosis and protection system. This ensures the safety of the FLME. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed strategies is validated through experiments.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Gas , Diseño de Equipo , Seguridad de EquiposRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To date, a consensus on the relative efficacy and safety of CO2 fractional laser versus erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) fractional laser treatments for atrophic acne scars has not been reached. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess and compare their effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. METHODS: For this meta-analysis, we conducted comprehensive searches in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, covering publications from their inception up to August 2023. Our focus was on studies comparing fractional CO2 laser with Er:YAG fractional laser treatments for atrophic acne scars. We excluded duplicate publications, research lacking full-text access, incomplete data, or cases where data extraction was not feasible. Additionally, animal experiments, reviews, and systematic reviews were not considered. Data analysis was performed using STATA 15.1. RESULTS: Eight studies (seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a retrospective study) were included in this meta-analysis. The sample size ranged from 28 to 106 with a total of 418 patients, including 210 in the CO2 fractional group and 208 in Er:YAG fractional group. The pooled results showed that the effective rate of CO2 fractional laser in treating atrophic acne scar was significantly higher than that of Er:YAG fractional laser (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.08-3.01) and the downtime of CO2 fractional laser in treating atrophic acne scar was significantly shorter than that of Er:YAG fractional laser (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) = -2.11, 95% CI: -3.11 to -1.10). In addition, VAS of CO2 fractional laser in treating atrophic acne scar was significantly higher than that of Er:YAG fractional laser (WMD = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.32-2.21) and the duration of erythema of CO2 fractional laser in treating atrophic acne scar was significantly longer than that of Er:YAG fractional laser (WMD = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.63-2.07). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of pain and incidence of PIHbetween CO2 fractional laser and of Er:YAG fractional laser. CONCLUSION: When it comes to treating atrophic acne scars, CO2 fractional laser demonstrates superior efficacy and leads to shorter downtime. However, it is important to note that CO2 fractional laser treatments tend to result in higher pain intensity and may carry a higher risk of post-treatment pigmentation compared to Er:YAG fractional laser procedures.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Cicatriz , Láseres de Gas , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Humanos , Acné Vulgar/complicaciones , Acné Vulgar/radioterapia , Atrofia/etiología , Cicatriz/etiología , Cicatriz/terapia , Láseres de Gas/uso terapéutico , Láseres de Gas/efectos adversos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/efectos adversos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/instrumentación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There remains an unmet need for a laser-enabled tissue coring device that can effectively improve face and neck skin laxity and rhytides. We investigate a novel 2910 nm erbium-doped fluoride glass fiber laser (2910 nm fiber laser) (UltraClear; Acclaro Medical) for laser-coring of submental tissue. METHODS: Five subjects, Glogau scale III-IV, were treated with a single pulse of the laser-coring mode of the 2910 nm fiber laser in the submentum. A 4 mm punch biopsy was immediately performed. Biopsy specimens were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and placed on glass slides. All sections were reviewed, and sections containing the center of the transected core were analyzed for depth and diameter of the ablative microchannel and width of the surrounding zone of coagulation. RESULTS: A total of 15 intact micro-cores were analyzed. Histological analysis revealed an average ± standard deviation microchannel diameter of 242.5 ± 65.2 µm, an average ablative depth of 980 ± 318.8 µm, and an average zone of coagulation of 104 ± 32 µm. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-enabled tissue coring with a novel 2910 nm fiber laser can safely achieve a wider microchannel diameter with ablative depth extending to the mid and deep dermis, which has the potential for collagen contraction and tissue tightening. Laser-coring to this ablation diameter and depth and with the surrounding zone of coagulation was found to be safe without adverse effects of post-inflammatory erythema or scarring in our study.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Envejecimiento de la Piel/efectos de la radiación , Adulto , Masculino , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentación , Cuello , Vidrio , CaraRESUMEN
Laser sources have established their potential effect in inducing hair regrowth. No large cohort study has evaluated the effect of ablative fractional 2940-nm erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er: YAG) laser in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). To investigate the efficacy and safety of the ablative fractional 2940-nm Er: YAG laser in combination with medication therapy for the treatment of AGA. We performed a retrospective study between first July 2021 to 30th December 2021. All included patients received oral finasteride and topical minoxidil, or combined with six sessions of Er: YAG laser at 2-week intervals. Patients were divided into medication or combined therapy groups. The efficacy of the two therapies was evaluated by the investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores and the patient's Likert satisfaction scale at week 12 and week 24. Changes in total, terminal and villous hair count, total and terminal hair diameter, and AGA grade were also recorded. Adverse events were evaluated at each follow-up. A total of 192 male patients with AGA were included, including 67 receiving combination treatment, and 125 receiving medication treatment. At week 24, the combination treatment afforded superior outcomes in the IGA score, patient's global assessment, total and terminal hair counts, and diameters (all P<0.05). No severe adverse events were reported in both groups. The combined therapy of ablative fractional Er: YAG laser and medication was superior in treating male AGA than single medication therapy without serious adverse effects.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Humanos , Alopecia/terapia , Alopecia/radioterapia , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Finasterida/administración & dosificación , Finasterida/uso terapéutico , Minoxidil/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/efectos adversos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of non-ablative fractionated lasers for skin rejuvenation has been proven to be effective in improving skin texture, and has become popular due to minimal wounding, significantly shorter recovery times and decreased adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze improvement in skin texture in healthy women aged over 18 years with Fitzpatrick skin types II-IV. METHODS: Participants received three facial and/or neck treatments with the 1570-nm fractional scanning diode laser at 1-month intervals. Three months after the last treatment session two blinded evaluators assessed skin improvement using before and after photos. Pain and patient satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: Sixteen women with a mean age of 45.4 ± 4.1 years (range 35-50 years) and skin type II-IV were included in the analysis. All 16 participants received facial treatments and seven (43.8%) also received neck treatments. Three months follow-up evaluation showed that the majority of participants had a visible change in the treated areas. Mean pain score was low and decreased with each treatment session. CONCLUSION: Skin treatment using fractional scanning 1570-nm diode laser improves skin laxity in women with skin types II-IV. Larger studies are warranted to further clarify the efficacy and safety of this modality.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Envejecimiento de la Piel , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rejuvenecimiento , Láseres de Semiconductores/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cara , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Dolor/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Objective of the study is to assess the effects of wound healing with a commercially available light emitting diode (LED) photo biomodulation (PBM) device that emits three wavelengths (465, 640 and 880nm) after ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment to healthy skin on the bilateral inner biceps. We conducted a prospective intraindividual randomized controlled study with 25 volunteers. AFL treatment was performed on healthy skin of the bilateral inner biceps. Subjects applied the LED light device for 30 min to the assigned bicep 3 times a week over 4 weeks, beginning on day 0. Subjects were followed up on days 2, 4, 6, 9, 13, 20 and 27 for treatment with the PBM device, clinical digital photography of the test and control sites, and in-person subject assessment, with follow ups on days 34 and 55 for clinical photography and assessment. Three blinded evaluators were asked to determine which bicep healed faster between day 0 to day 13. Pain, discomfort, and itch were also assessed. The three blinded evaluators chose the treatment arm as the faster healed arm in greater than 50% of the images, although the results were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between test and control arms in terms of pain, discomfort and itch. In conclusion, PBM therapy has the potential to improve wound healing. In this study, a three wavelength PBM device resulted in some subjects achieving faster healing after AFL but the results were not statistically significant.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Humanos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Piel , DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory disease associated with various sequelae after skin lesion remission. Acne erythema has been considered simple erythema or a vascular lesion; however, because the understanding of this disease has improved, acne erythema is currently considered an early scar with erythematous components. AIMS: This study evaluated the efficacy of using both a 595-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) and 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser (NAFL) for the treatment of erythematous scars caused by acne. METHODS: Ninety patients with acne scars were equally randomized to two groups. Group A (n = 45) received treatment with the NAFL. Group B (n = 45) received treatment with the PDL and NAFL. Each patient underwent one treatment session and 4 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: Qualitative (χ2 = 12.415; p < 0.05) and quantitative (t = 2.675; p < 0.05) scores of Groups A and B were determined using a global scarring grading system and exhibited statistically significant differences. The quantitative score of Group A was higher than that of Group B (6.67 ± 3.46 vs. 4.98 ± 2.44). The erythema areas of the groups differed significantly after treatment, with Group B exhibiting more notable score improvements (5.00 [3.10, 7.10] vs. 2.80 [1.65, 4.60]; Z = 3.072; p < 0.05). The erythema regression rate of Group B (88.9%) was significantly higher than that of Group A (66.7%) (χ2 = 20.295; p < 0.001). Adverse events, including redness and swelling (86.6%), scabbing (78.8%), and purpura (36.6%), occurred within 7 days for 86.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of the PDL and NAFL is safe and effective for erythematous acne scars.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Cicatriz , Eritema , Láseres de Colorantes , Humanos , Láseres de Colorantes/uso terapéutico , Láseres de Colorantes/efectos adversos , Acné Vulgar/complicaciones , Acné Vulgar/radioterapia , Cicatriz/etiología , Cicatriz/terapia , Cicatriz/diagnóstico , Cicatriz/radioterapia , Femenino , Masculino , Eritema/etiología , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/efectos adversos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/instrumentación , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , AdolescenteRESUMEN
Background: Atrophic acne scarring is a widely prevalent condition and one of the most distressing complications of acne vulgaris. Numerous options with variable outcomes are available for the treatment of acne scarring. Laser is considered a first-line therapy for acne scars, and recently there has been a growing interest in using stem cells and their derivatives for treating acne scars. In addition, combined therapeutic modalities often achieve more satisfactory results than a single treatment. Objective: We tried to evaluate the role of nanofat and fractional CO2 laser as a combined treatment approach for atrophic acne scarring. Methods: Twenty-five patients with atrophic acne scarring were enrolled. They received a single session of intradermal nanofat injection, at different points 1 cm apart, for acne scars. Two weeks later, they were treated with three sessions of fractional CO2 laser at monthly intervals. Patients were evaluated three months after the last session using the quantitative Goodman and Baron scoring system. Pain, side effects, and patients' satisfaction were also evaluated. Results: There were two males and 23 females with a mean age of 25.96 years. Their skin type ranged between Fitzpatrick skin type III, IV, and V. Boxcar scars were the most common scar type in 13 patients (52%). After treatment, there was a significant reduction (p <0.05) in the quantitative Goodman and Baron scores. The improvement was more evident in rolling scars. Seven patients reported significant improvement, and 12 reported marked improvement. Conclusion: This study showed that combining nanofat and fractional CO2 laser is a safe and effective treatment modality for atrophic acne scars.
RESUMEN
This study aimed to investigate the impact of ablative fractional laser (AFL) on hedgehog pathway gene expression in murine microscopic basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and compare these results to the effect of topical treatment with vismodegib, an FDA-approved hedgehog inhibitor. In 25 mice, 1 cm2 skin test sites (n = 44) containing microscopic BCCs were exposed to one of three interventions: a single CO2 AFL treatment (1 pulse, 40 mJ/microbeam, wavelength 10.6 µm, 5% density, pulse rate 250 Hz, n = 12), eight topical vismodegib treatments (3.8 mg/mL, n = 8), or combination of AFL and vismodegib treatments (n = 9). Untreated controls were included for comparison (n = 15). After 4 days, skin samples were analyzed for hedgehog gene expression (Gli1, Gli2, and Ptch1) by qPCR and vismodegib concentrations by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (data analyzed with two-tailed t-tests and linear regression). A single treatment with AFL monotherapy significantly reduced hedgehog gene expression compared to untreated controls (Gli1 72.4% reduction, p = 0.003; Gli2 55.2%, p = 0.010; Ptch1 70.9%, p < 0.001). Vismodegib treatment also reduced hedgehog gene expression (Gli1 91.6%; Gli2 83.3%; Ptch1 83.0%), significantly surpassing AFL monotherapy for two out of three genes (Gli1, p = 0.017; Gli2, p = 0.007; Ptch1, p = 0.15). AFL and vismodegib combination mirrored the effects of vismodegib monotherapy (Gli1, p = 0.424; Gli2, p = 0.289; Ptch1, p = 0.593), possibly due to comparable cutaneous vismodegib concentrations (mean ± SD, vismodegib monotherapy 850 ± 475 µmol/L; combination 1036 ± 824 µmol/L; p = 0.573). In conclusion, a single AFL treatment significantly reduced hedgehog gene expression in murine BCCs mimicking the effects of eight topical applications of vismodegib. Further studies are needed to assess whether AFL can be utilized for BCC treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs.
Asunto(s)
Anilidas , Carcinoma Basocelular , Piridinas , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Animales , Ratones , Proteínas Hedgehog/genética , Proteínas Hedgehog/metabolismo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Proteína con Dedos de Zinc GLI1/genética , Proteína con Dedos de Zinc GLI1/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Basocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Basocelular/genética , Expresión Génica , Rayos LáserRESUMEN
Objective: Aging and changes in hormone levels influence the appearance of the vulva, including the texture, pigmentation, and other manifestations, all of which may largely affect the physical and mental health of women. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment for vulvar rejuvenation in Chinese women. Background: The limited options currently available for vulvar rejuvenation raise concerns. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether the fractional CO2 laser can safely and effectively rejuvenate the vulvar area for women of various ages and races. Methods: The study included 17 patients (mean age = 36.4 years) treated three times by continuous fractional CO2 laser with an interval of 1 month between each session. The primary outcomes were changes in vulva texture and pigmentation. Treatment was evaluated using images of the patients. Baseline and posttreatment images were collected and evaluated using a scoring system from 0 to 3 to grade the vulvar texture and pigmentation changes. In addition, patients rated their degree of vaginal rejuvenation after the treatment using a scoring system from 0 to 3. Results: Fractional CO2 laser treatment effectively and significantly increased vulvar texture and decreased vulvar pigmentation after three sessions (p < 0.05). Patients also self-reported noticeable improvement. There were no adverse reactions during the treatment and follow-up. Conclusions: Fractional CO2 laser treatment is a safe and effective method for vulvar rejuvenation in women.
Asunto(s)
Dióxido de Carbono , Láseres de Gas , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Rejuvenecimiento , Vulva , Láseres de Gas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This split-face randomized study compared the efficacy and safety between 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array (MLA) and 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser to treat enlarged pores. METHODS: Participants with enlarged facial pores were enrolled and underwent three consecutive sessions at 2-week intervals with either a 1064-nm picosecond laser with MLA or a 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser. Images were captured at each visit. Objective (pore number) and subjective assessments, including patient self-evaluations and quartile improvement scales, were used to evaluate the treatment efficacy. The pain levels and adverse effects were recorded at each subsequent visit. RESULTS: The participants were 3 men and 22 women with enlarged facial pores. At the initial and 2-month checkups after the last treatment, the pore numbers were significantly decreased bilaterally for both lasers. The respective quartile improvement scale scores for the 1064-nm picosecond and 1565-nm fractional lasers were 2.22 ± 1.06 and 2.14 ± 1.11, while those for patient self-assessment were 3.72 ± 0.74 and 3.68 ± 0.75. The pore number, quartile improvement scale score, and patients' self-assessments did not differ significantly between the two lasers. Treatment with the 1064-nm picosecond laser better reduced pain compared with the 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser (4.11 ± 1.33 vs. 4.83 ± 1.17). The occurrence of pigmentation did not differ significantly between the lasers. CONCLUSION: Both the 1064-nm picosecond laser with MLA and the 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser are viable options for treating enlarged pores, and showed comparable respective efficacies; however, the former was less likely to cause hyperpigmentation and was better tolerated.