RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this historical review is to illustrate the progression and evolution of treatment for distal femur fractures. METHODS: Scientific literature was searched for descriptions of treatment for distal femur fractures to provide an in-depth overview of the topic, with emphasis on the evolution of surgical constructs used to treat these fractures. RESULTS: Prior to the 1950s, distal femur fractures were treated nonoperatively, resulting in considerable morbidity, limb deformity, and limited function. As principles of surgical intervention for fractures emerged in the 1950s, surgeons developed conventional straight plates to better stabilize distal femur fractures. Angle blade plates and dynamic condylar screws emerged out of this scaffolding to prevent post-treatment varus collapse. Meanwhile, intramedullary nails, and later, in the 1990s, locking screws, were introduced to minimize soft tissue disruption. Treatment failure led to the development of locking compression plates with the advantage of accommodating either locking or nonlocking screws. Despite this advancement, the rare but significant incidence of nonunion has not been eliminated, leading to the recognition of the biomechanical environment as important for prevention and the development of active plating techniques. CONCLUSION: Emphasis for the surgical treatment of distal femur fractures has incrementally progressed over time, with initial focus on complete stabilization of the fracture while the biological environment surrounding the fracture was ignored. Techniques slowly evolved to minimize soft tissue disruption, allow more ease of implant placement at the fracture site, and attend to the systemic health of the patient, while simultaneously ensuring appropriate fracture fixation. Through this dynamic process, the desired results of complete fracture healing and maximization of functional outcomes have emerged.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: For proximal humeral fractures open reduction und internal fixation (ORIF) with a fixed-angle plate is considered the gold standard for surgical management. However, it can lead to poor functional outcomes and is associated with postoperative complications. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of fracture severity by applying a new classification (simple versus complex) on clinical outcome and quality of life after ORIF of proximal humerus fractures. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical study with an average follow-up period of 12 (SD 1) months after ORIF of proximal humeral fractures with a fixed-angle plate. The postoperative function and quality of life was measured using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the Constant Score. Data was tested for statistical significance with the Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test. Based on the findings of this study a simplified fracture classification system has been developed. Results: Seventy-two patients with a mean age of 65 years (SD 12) with 69% being males were included. According to the Neer classification, 35% (n=25) non-displaced ("one-part fractures"), 19% (n=14) two-part fractures, 15% (n=11) three-part fractures and 31% (n=22) four-part fractures were detected. Regarding the AO/OTA classification, 18% (n=13) were type A fractures, 43% (n=31) type B and 39% (n=28) type C fractures. From these criteria we derived our own fracture classification, including 50% (n=36) simple and 50% (n=36) severe fractures. Patients with simple fracture types achieved significantly higher total values in the Constant Score as well as the OSS (p=0.008; p=0.013). The cumulative incidence of complications in the entire patient collective was 14% (n=10) with humeral head necrosis (n=5) occurring only in the severe fracture group. Conclusions: The postoperative clinical outcome as well as the incidence of humeral head necrosis after ORIF of proximal humeral fractures with a fixed-angle plate correlates with the fracture type and severity. The newly derived fracture classification into simple and severe fractures is suitable with regard to clinical results and complication rate. However, prospective studies comparing ORIF vs. conservative treatment of proximal humeral fractures of the same severity are required. Level of Evidence: III.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patella fractures is technically demanding. Although the radiological results are mostly satisfactory, this often does not correspond to the subjective assessment of the patients. The classical treatment with tension band wiring with K­wires has several complications. Fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis seems to be biomechanically advantageous. OBJECTIVE: Who is treating patella fractures in Germany? What is the current standard of treatment? Have modern forms of osteosynthesis become established? What are the most important complications? MATERIAL AND METHODS: The members of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery and the German Knee Society were asked to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: A total of 511 completed questionnaires were evaluated. Most of the respondents are specialized in trauma surgery (51.5%), have many years of professional experience and work in trauma centers. Of the surgeons 50% treat ≤5 patella fractures annually. In almost 40% of the cases preoperative imaging is supplemented by computed tomography. The classical tension band wiring with K­wires is still the preferred form of osteosynthesis for all types of fractures (transverse fractures 52%, comminuted fractures 40%). In the case of comminuted fractures 30% of the surgeons choose fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis. If the inferior pole is involved a McLaughlin cerclage is used for additional protection in 60% of the cases. DISCUSSION: The standard of care for patella fractures in Germany largely corresponds to the updated S2e guidelines. Tension band wiring is still the treatment of choice. Further (long-term) clinical studies are needed to verify the advantages of fixed-angle plates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of volar plating using two different implants for distal radius fractures. Fifty-two patients with AO type C fractures were placed in either of two groups: the AO LDRS group (26 patients) or the Acu-Loc group (26 patients). Radiological parameters including radial length, radial inclination, volar tilt, and intra-articular step-off were significantly improved after surgery. The mean Mayo Wrist Performance Score was 84.6 in the AO LDRS group and 81.1 in the Acu-Loc group. The mean Subjective Wrist Value was 86.7% in the AO LDRS group and 86.3% in the Acu-Loc group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to both radiological and clinical outcomes at the final follow-up evaluation. Volar fixed-angle plating for unstable distal radius fractures had satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes. The difference of implant design did not influence overall final outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in implant technology offer updated options for surgical management that have been rapidly adopted into clinical practice. The objective of this study is to biomechanically test and compare the current fixation options available for surgical fixation of two-part proximal humerus fractures and establish load to failure and stiffness values. METHODS: Sixteen match-paired (32 total) fresh-frozen, cadaveric specimens were randomized to receive 1 of 4 fixation constructs following creation of an AO/OTA Type 11A3 (two-part) proximal humerus fractures. Fixation constructs tested consisted of 3.5 mm fixed angle plate (3.5-FAP), 4.5 mm fixed angle plate (4.5-FAP), humeral intramedullary nail (IMN), and a humeral intramedullary nail with a fixed angle blade (IMN-FAB). Specimen bone density was measured to ensure no adequate, non-osteoporotic bone. Constructs were tested for stiffness and ultimate load to failure and compared via one-way ANOVA analysis with subsequent post hoc Tukey HSD multiple group comparison statistical analysis. RESULTS: The IMN-FAB construct was significantly stiffer than the 3.5-FAP construct (123.8 vs. 23.9, p<0.0001), the 4.5-FAP construct (123.8 vs. 33.3, p<0.0001) and the IMN construct (123.8 vs. 60.1, p=0.005). The IMN-FAB construct reported a significantly higher load to failure than the 3.5-FAB construct (4667.3 N vs. 1756.9 N, p<0.0001), and the 4.5-FAP construct (4667.3 N vs. 2829.4 N, p=0.019, Table 2). The IMN construct had a significantly higher load to failure than the 3.5-FAP construct (3946.8 vs. 1756.9, p=0.001, Table 2). CONCLUSION: Biomechanical testing of modern fixation options for two-part proximal humerus fracture exhibited that the stiffest and highest load to failure construct was the IMN-FAB followed by the IMN, 3.5-FAP and then the 4.5-FAP constructs. However, prospective clinical trials with longer-term follow-up are required for definitive assessment of the ideal fixation construct for surgical management of two-part proximal humerus fractures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Twenty-five patients with closed distal tibial fractures were treated with a fixed-angle (locked) plate osteosynthesis. The study period was from 1.1.06 to 31.12.07. According to AO classification, there were three A1, eight A2, nine A3, one B2, two C1, and two C3 fractures. All patients had a follow up examination after an average of 16.6 months. Complications included a technical mistake (fixation in slight malangulation), two infections, and one non union that showed consolidation after 15 months. All other patients reached bone consolidation and full weight bearing after an average of 3.5 months. The ankle range of motion for all patients was, on average, flexion/extension 18°/35°, without restrictions on the walking distance. No loss of reduction occurred. Fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis is a good alternative to intramedullary nailing when treating closed distal lower leg fractures. It is a demanding surgical method with good clinical and functional results.

RESUMEN

Fractures of the humeral head account for 5% of all fractures and incidence increases with age. Depending on fracture form and patients age a wide variety of therapeutical options exist. Stable fractures can be treated conservatively, while the majority of unstable and displaced fractures require surgical treatment. Many different surgical options are available; open reduction and internal fixation are widely preferred. The S3 Proximal Humerus Plate is a contoured plate to match the complex shape of the proximal humerus. It is designed to be positioned distal to the greater tuberosity preventing subacromial impingement.Between august 1 and 30, 2007, 5 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (that is primary operative stabilization within 7 days after trauma in a standardized way and minimal follow up period of 3 month) with acute fractures of the proximal humerus were treated with S3 Proximal Humerus Plate. Follow up was performed using the Constant Score. The mean age was 59.0 years. According to the Neer classification fractures were rated as Neer 2,3 and 4. A mean Constant score of 72.3 (57-86) points was obtained.We did not observe any complications like humeral head necroses, loss of reduction, deep infection or breakage of the plate.

RESUMEN

Volar plating seems to indicate that many surgeons believe it leads to superior results, and is attractive because of the ease of the operative approach and the soft tissue sleeve to protect digital and wrist tendons. And also it have a locking mechanism to produce the fixed angle device with a low profile and may be thought to be a new era in the surgical treatment of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures even in the face of comminuted or osteoporotic bone. Locked volar plating allows direct fracture reduction, stable fixation and provides stability enough to allow early mobilization and function. The results with volar locking or fixed angle fixation for the general treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients has been favorable. Volar plating has fewer complications than external fixation and dorsal plating and allow for earlier return to function. The current indications, technical aspects, clinical results, and complications of the volar plating are being reviewed.

Asunto(s)