RESUMEN
The diagnosis of prenatal microcephaly, as well as the possibility of underlining a genetic cause, is becoming more frequent thanks to advances in prenatal imaging and parallel massive sequencing. One case of primary microcephaly in three sibs demonstrates how complementary diagnostic exams can help to diagnose and establish the etiology.
Asunto(s)
Microcefalia , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Microcefalia/genética , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuroimagen/efectos adversos , Genómica , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neurologic injury in the surviving twin is a risk after single fetal demise in a monochorionic pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe fetal magnetic resonance neuroimaging findings in pregnancies complicated by single fetal demise after laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of a cohort of prospectively collected patients in a monochorionic twin registry who had fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome with single fetal demise at follow-up. Magnetic resonance neuroimaging was offered 3 to 4 weeks after the demise to assess for potential neurologic sequelae. Magnetic resonance images were interpreted by 2 board-certified neuroradiologists and classified as normal, mildly abnormal, or severely abnormal. The groups were compared on the basis of recipient vs donor demise using the Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for abnormal magnetic resonance neuroimaging. RESULTS: In 378 laser photocoagulation procedures, 64 cases (16.9%) of single demise were identified (36 in the donor group and 28 in the recipient group). Of note, 6 patients had rupture of membranes with nonviable delivery (3 from each group). Moreover, 40 patients (69%) underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Of those patients, 12 (30%) had abnormal findings: 10 (83%) were associated with mild changes, and 2 (17%) were associated with severe findings. Abnormal magnetic resonance neuroimaging was seen in 3 of 22 patients (14%) after donor demise and 9 of 18 patients (50%) after recipient demise (P=.02). Logistic regression revealed that recipient vs donor demise was an independent risk factor for abnormal magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, 2 pregnancies with severe magnetic resonance imaging findings had complicated courses. CONCLUSION: Mildly abnormal magnetic resonance neuroimaging findings were common after laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome complicated by single fetal demise and were more common in cases of recipient demise than donor demise. Severe magnetic resonance neuroimaging findings in this series were limited to patients with complicated peri- or postoperative courses.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión Feto-Fetal , Femenino , Muerte Fetal/etiología , Transfusión Feto-Fetal/complicaciones , Transfusión Feto-Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Transfusión Feto-Fetal/cirugía , Fetoscopía , Humanos , Coagulación con Láser/efectos adversos , Coagulación con Láser/métodos , Rayos Láser , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Neuroimagen/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging is commonly thought of as a development of modern times (last two decades). Yet, this field mobilized shortly after the discovery and implementation of MRI technology. Here, we provide a review of the parallel advancements in the fields of fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging, noting the shifts from clinical to research use, and the ongoing challenges in this fast-growing field. We chronicle the pioneering science of fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging, highlighting the early studies that set the stage for modern advances in imaging during this developmental period, and the large-scale multi-site efforts which ultimately led to the explosion of interest in the field today. Lastly, we consider the growing pains of the community and the need for an academic society that bridges expertise in developmental neuroscience, clinical science, as well as computational and biomedical engineering, to ensure special consideration of the vulnerable mother-offspring dyad (especially during pregnancy), data quality, and image processing tools that are created, rather than adapted, for the young brain.