Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite recent national improvements in family leave policies, there has been little focus on program-level support for surgical trainees. Trainees who may require clinical duty adjustments during pregnancy, who experience pregnancy loss, or who struggle with balancing work obligations with the demands of a new infant may face stigma when seeking schedule accommodations. The aim of this study was to describe program and colleague support of surgical trainees for pregnancy-related and postpartum health needs. DESIGN: Survey questionnaire. Participants responded to multiple-choice questions about their history of pregnancy loss, their experience with reduction of clinical duties during pregnancy, and their breastfeeding experience. Those who took time off after miscarriages or reduced their clinical duties during pregnancy were asked whether they perceived their colleagues and/or program leadership to be supportive using a 4-point Likert scale (1-strongly agree, 4-strongly disagree) which was dichotomized to agree/disagree. SETTING: Electronically distributed through social media and surgical societies from November 2020 to January 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Female surgical residents and fellows. RESULTS: 258 female surgical residents and fellows were included. Median age was 32 (IQR 30-35) years and 76.74% were white. Of the 52 respondents (20.2%) who reported a miscarriage, 38 (73.1%) took no time off after pregnancy loss, including 5 of 10 women (50%) whose loss occurred after 10 weeks' gestation. Of the 14 residents who took time off after a miscarriage, 4 (28.6%) disagreed their colleagues and/or leadership were supportive of time away from work. Among trainees who reported at least 1 live birth, only 18/114 (15.8%) reduced their work schedule during pregnancy. Of these, 11 (61.1%) described stigma and resentment from colleagues and 14 (77.8%) reported feeling guilty about burdening their colleagues. 100% of respondents reported a desire to breastfeed their infants, but nearly half (46.0%) were unable to reach their breastfeeding goals. 46 (80.7%) cited a lack of time to express breastmilk and 23 (40.4%) cited inadequate lactation facilities as barriers to achieving their breastfeeding goals. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of female trainees takes time off or reduces their clinical duties for pregnancy or postpartum health needs. National parental leave policies are insufficient without complementary program-level strategies that support schedule adjustments for pregnant trainees without engendering a sense of resentment or guilt for doing so. Surgical program leaders should initiate open dialogue, proactively offer clinical duty reductions, and ensure time and space for lactation needs to safeguard maternal-fetal health and improve the working environment for pregnant residents.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To learn the influence of obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) female residents' lifestyle on obstetric and gynecological characteristics compared to women matched by age from the general population. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional multicenter study including OB/GYN female residents from ten different hospitals in Israel, who completed an internet questionnaire published during 2017-2018, that were compared to women matched by age from the general population. Questions dealt with lifestyle habits, obstetrical and gynecological outcomes. Data are presented as median and inter-quartile range. RESULTS: During the study period 97 women completed the questionnaire, of them 56 (57.7%) OB/GYN female residents and 41(42.3%) controls. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding age, marital status, gravidity and parity. However, lifestyle characteristics reported by OB/GYN female residents differed compared to controls: OB/GYN female residents found their work more stressogenic [53 (94.6%) vs. 20 (48.8%); p = 0.001], suffered from deprived sleep [42(75.6%) vs. 13(31.8%); p = 0.001], were less punctilious on dental hygiene [13(23.2%) vs. 27(65.8%); p = 0.001] and reported maintaining a less healthy diet [35(62.5%) vs. 15(36.6%); p = 0.003]. Despite these differences, general happiness reported by both groups was comparable (35(62.5%) vs. 27(65.9%) for OB/GYN and control women respectively; p = 0.73). Pregnancy rate was found to be more than double in the resident's group [30 (53.6%) vs. 9 (22%); p = 0.002], with no differences in the rates of: complications during pregnancy [51(91.1%) vs. 38(92.7%); p = 0.78]; abortions [10 (17.9%) vs. 8 (19.5%); p = 0.84]; augmentation of labor [5 (9%) vs. 7 (17.1%); p = 0.18]; or cesarean deliveries [7(12.5%) vs. 7(17%); p = 0.48]. Logistic regression analysis found both parity and residency as independent variables significantly associated with pregnancy rate [(B = 0.69, p = 0.047), (B = 1.95, p = 0.016), respectively]. CONCLUSION: Although resident women in OB/GYN reported on more adverse lifestyle parameters, comparable obstetric and gynecological outcomes were seen, with residency and parity being independently associated with higher pregnancy rate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Women account for approximately 15% of the active duty US Army, and studies show that women may be at an increased risk of musculoskeletal injury during sport and military training. Nationally, the field of orthopedic surgery comprises 14% women, lagging behind other surgical fields. Demographics for US Military orthopedic surgeons are not readily available. Similarly, demographic data of graduating medical students entering Military Medicine are not reported. We hypothesize that a gender disparity within military orthopedics will be apparent. We will compare the demographic profile of providers to our patients and hypothesize that the two groups are dissimilar. Secondarily, we examine the demographics of military medical students potentially entering orthopedics from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) or the Health Professions Scholarship Program. METHODS: A census was formed of all US Army active duty orthopedic surgeons to include staff surgeons and residents, as well as US Army medical student graduates and orthopedic patients. RESULTS: There are 252 Army orthopedic surgeons and trainees; 26 (10.3%) are women and 226 (89.7%) are men. There were no significant demographic differences between residents and staff. Between 2014 and 2017, the 672 members of the USUHS graduating classes included 246 Army graduates. Of those, 62 (25%) were female. Army Health Professions Scholarship Program graduated 1,072 medical students, with women comprising 300 (28%) of the group. No statistical trends were seen over the 4 yr at USUHS or in Health Professions Scholarship Program. In total, 2,993 orthopedic clinic visits during the study period were by Army service members, 23.6% were women. CONCLUSION: There exists a gender disparity among US Army orthopedic surgeons, similar to that seen in civilian orthopedics. Gender equity is also lacking among medical students who feed into Army graduate medical education programs. The gender profile of our patient population is not reflected by that of providers. Because patients prefer providers of the same gender, this is a limitation to patient satisfaction and access to care for musculoskeletal injuries. Further study is underway to identify perceptions and potential causes of these disparities, including the critical perspective of our patients. In addition to the inherent benefits offered by diversity (e.g., expanding the talent pool and more perspectives for decision-making), ultimately it affords a greater ability to maintain a fit and ready force.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ratios of women graduating from the only US military medical school and entering surgical internships were reviewed and compared with national trends. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences graduation announcements from 2002 to 2012. RESULTS: There were 1,771 graduates from 2002 to 2012, with 508 female (29%) and 1,263 male (71%) graduates. Female graduates increased over time (21% to 39%; P = .014). Female general surgery interns increased from 3.9% to 39% (P = .025). Female overall surgical subspecialty interns increased from 20% in 2002 to 36% in 2012 (P = .046). Women were represented well in obstetrics (57%), urology (44%), and otolaryngology (31%), but not in neurosurgery, orthopedics, and ophthalmology (0% to 20%). CONCLUSIONS: The sex disparity between military and civilian medical students occurs before entry. Once in medical school, women are just as likely to enter general surgery or surgical subspecialty as their male counterparts. Increased ratio of women in the class is unlikely to lead to a shortfall except in specific subspecialties.

Asunto(s)