RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) ventral hernia repair requires incising the peritoneum from within the abdominal cavity, developing a flap, and placing a reinforcing mesh after fascial closure from the preperitoneal space. We present a novel adaptation to this technique that allows placement of preperitoneal mesh without entering the abdominal cavity. The robotic totally extra- and preperitoneal (R-PeTEP) access for ventral hernia repair is best suited for small to moderate sized ventral hernias with concomitant diastasis recti. METHODS: Our study is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent R-PeTEP from December 2022 to November 2023. A comprehensive description of the surgical technique is included. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, as well as clinical outcomes are described. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients underwent R-PeTEP for ventral hernia repair with diastasis recti plication. The median age was 55 years (IQR 43.5-63) and 92% (n = 23) were male. The median ASA score was 2 (IQR 1-2) and the median BMI was 30.4 (IQR 29.3-32.8) with 64% (n = 16) percent having a BMI ≥ 30. Median hernia width was 3 cm (IQR 3-4), with a median diastasis recti width of 4 cm (IQR 2.6-4) and length of 15 cm (IQR 11.8-16). The median operative time was 120 min (IQR 116-134). All repairs were reinforced with permanent mesh. Sixty-eight percent of the patients (n = 17) were discharged on the same day. With a median follow-up of 30 days (IQR 16-107), 8% (n = 2) seromas, 16% (n = 4) developed clinically insignificant hematomas, and one patient (4%) developed ileus that was managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: This study establishes the feasibility and safety of R-PeTEP, which provides direct access to the preperitoneal space, avoiding disruption to the posterior rectus sheath, possibly reducing neurovascular bundle injuries, and omitting entry to the abdominal cavity. R-PeTEP facilitates wide flap creation for prosthetic overlap and allows for posterior plication of diastasis recti with little to no mesh fixation with overall excellent preliminary clinical outcomes.

RESUMEN

Background: Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach is one of the commonly used minimally invasive method in inguinal hernia repair. There are limited data that compares the results of the telescopic dissection and balloon trocar for preperitoneal dissection. In our study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the TEP cases performed at our center and compare the results of these two techniques. Methods: TEP cases performed between 2020 and 2024 were evaluated. Strangulated and recurrent hernia cases were excluded. Telescopic dissection and balloon trocar techniques were compared in terms of conversion, postoperative pain, complications, and recurrence. Results: A total of 177 patients were included. Telescopic method was used in 122 cases, while a balloon trocar was used in 55 cases. The median age was 50 years (range: 20-86), and 163 patients (92%) were male. Bilateral inguinal hernia was present in 61 patients (35%). The median operative time was 100 minutes (IQR: 80-120 minutes). Conversion was required in a total of 3 cases (1.5%); specifically, the transabdominal preperitoneal method was employed in 2 cases, and Lichtenstein-style anterior approach hernia repair was performed in one case. Between the telescopic dissection and balloon trocar groups, no significant differences were observed in operation time (P = .407), conversion rates (P = .228), postoperative pain scores (P = .505, P = .264, P = .681, P = .743), complication rates (P = .205), or recurrence rates (P = .311). Conclusions: The results of using a balloon trocar and telescopic dissection in inguinal hernia repair with TEP are similar, and telescopic dissection could be a cost-effective alternative to the balloon trocar.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The extended totally extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) is a relatively new laparoscopic approach to address ventral hernias. Since this technique is not widely used yet, the literature regarding its efficacy and safety is limited, especially when compared to more established surgical techniques like intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). This study aimed at contributing to the expanding body of evidence for eTEP, by comparing the early outcomes of eTEP and IPOM surgeries for ventral hernias. METHODS: This monocentric, retrospective cohort study compared patients with ventral hernias that were treated with eTEP or IPOM from 2019 to 2023. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were analysed. 92 underwent eTEP and 31 IPOM respectively. Both groups were overall comparable. The IPOM group had a higher proportion of incisional hernias (61,29% vs. 21,74%, p < 0,001). This was taken into account for in a subgroup analysis of only primary hernias. The IPOM group had a significantly longer admission time (eTEP: 3 days, IPOM: 4 days, p < 0,001). The subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant shorter surgery time in IPOM (median of 66,5 min vs. 106,5 min; p = 0,043) and a lower rate of postoperative complications in eTEP (eTEP: 4,17%, IPOM: 25%. p = 0,009). The eTEP group reported lower postoperative pain, yet without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: eTEP for ventral hernia repair appears to be non-inferior to IPOM. Compared to IPOM it leads to shorter postoperative hospital stay and a potentially lower complication rate, despite a longer operation time.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach has demonstrated safety, efficacy, and durability for small- to medium-sized hernia repairs, the relationships between retrorectus insufflation, intraoperative respiratory stability, and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) levels has not been appraised. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing elective robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs at our quaternary academic center from July 2018 through December 2021. Patients were grouped by repair technique, either eTEP or robotic transversus abdominis release (r-TAR). Baseline demographics, intraoperative anesthesia records, and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Anesthesia data were collected at intubation and 30-min time intervals thereafter. Operative time, length of stay, patient-controlled anesthesia use, and perioperative complications were compared. RESULTS: In total, 205 patients underwent an eTEP repair and 97 patients underwent an r-TAR repair. Intraoperatively, eTEP repairs had significantly higher ETCO2 at the beginning of the case (times 1-4, P < 0.05), and a higher peak ETCO2 (P < 0.05) when compared to r-TAR repairs. This difference in ETCO2 desisted as the case progressed, with a subsequent increase in respiratory rate (times 2-6, P < 0.05) in the eTEP procedures. The eTEP group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times, decreased patient-controlled anesthesia use, and a shorter length of stay. There was no significant difference in postoperative intensive care unit admission or respiratory distress. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that retrorectus insufflation during eTEP hernia repairs correlated with higher levels of ETCO2 compared to r-TAR repairs yet was not associated with any meaningful difference in perioperative outcomes. Communication of these respiratory differences with anesthesia is needed for proper ventilation adjustments.

RESUMEN

Background and objective: The role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer is still controversial. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PLND between extraperitoneal single-port (SP eRARP) and transperitoneal multiport (MP tRARP) robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis from our single-center database for patients who underwent SP eRARP or MP tRARP with PLND between 2015 and 2023. The primary endpoint was to analyze and compare specific data related to PLND between the two populations by the detection of pN+ patients, the total number of lymph nodes removed, and the number of positive lymph nodes removed. The secondary endpoints included comparing major complications, lymphoceles, and biochemical recurrence between the two cohorts of the study. Key findings and limitations: A total of 293 patients were included, with 85 (29%) undergoing SP eRARP and 208 (71%) undergoing MP tRARP. SP eRARP showed significant differences in PLND extension from MP tRARP, while MP tRARP yielded more lymph nodes (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pN+ patient detection (p = 0.7) or the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.6). The rates of major complications (p = 0.6), lymphoceles (p = 0.2), and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.9) were similar between the two groups. Additionally, SP eRARP had shorter operative time (p = 0.045), hospital stay (p < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at discharge (p = 0.03). Limitations include a retrospective, single-center analysis. Conclusions and clinical implications: Despite the SP approach in RARP resulting in fewer retrieved lymph nodes, outcomes were comparable with the MP approach regarding the detection of patients with positive lymph nodes and the number of positive nodes. Additionally, the SP approach led to lower pain levels and shorter hospital stays. Patient summary: With this study, we demonstrate that pelvic lymph node dissection performed via the extraperitoneal approach during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single-port system provides comparable outcomes with the standard transperitoneal multiport approach in detecting patients with positive lymph nodes and retrieving positive nodes. In addition, it offers significantly reduced pain levels and shorter hospital stays.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair are the principal techniques in laparoscopic hernia repair. Seroma formation and pain are frequent complications of moderate-large size laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia mesh repair. This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of defect closure in moderate-large direct inguinal hernias and its effect on various outcomes. Method: This is a prospective cohort study from September 2020 to August 2021, where a total of 88 patients with uncomplicated direct inguinal hernia (M3 or more) were enrolled in the study and divided into two equal groups of TEP defect closure and non-closure, and various outcome measures were noted. Results: The majority of patients were male (94.31%), with a mean age range of 18-85 years, and had right-sided inguinal hernia (46.5%). Seroma formation at 10th POD in the defect closure and non-closure were 24% and 33% (p value: 0.225), which reduced to 11% and 18%, respectively, at 1 month (p value: 1.000). All seromas resolved within 6 months. Pain in VAS at 10th POD in the defect closure and non-closure were 1.55±0.571 and 1.38±0.527, respectively (p value: 0.121), which gradually decreased to 1.20±0.524 and 1.16±0.420 at a 6-month interval (p value: 0.689). The mean operative time in the bilateral and unilateral defect closure groups was 72.3±4.1 and 56.5±4.3 min, respectively, whereas that in the bilateral and unilateral defect non-closure groups was 62.3±3.7 and 45.7±3.6 min, respectively. Conclusion: The defect closure was found to have higher pain and less seroma formation at various intervals of time following TEP for moderate-large direct inguinal hernia. Although these findings were statistically insignificant, they may be clinically significant, and further studies with a larger sample size are suggested.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A midline extraperitoneal approach for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (EP-RPLND) has been associated with decreased morbidity compared to transperitoneal approach. We aimed to review our 11-year experience in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) who underwent EP-RPLND at a single institution. METHODS: All patients with GCT who underwent EP-RPLND between 2010 to 2021 were reviewed. Surgical, peri-operative, and oncologic outcomes were reported. A logistic regression model was developed to evaluate variables predictive of early discharge. Oncologic outcomes included recurrence free survival (2-year RFS) and recurrence patterns, which were analyzed according to pathology. RESULTS: Overall, 237 patients underwent EP-RPLND, of which 72% were in the post-chemotherapy (PC) setting. Median follow-up was 16.7(IQR 3.9-39.6) months. Median size of retroperitoneal disease was 2.8 (1.8-5.4)cm, of which 16 cases were > 10 cm. There were no cases of postoperative ileus or readmission due to small bowel obstruction. Median hospital stay was 2(IQR 1-3) days. From 2020 to 2021, 73% of patients were discharged on POD1 and 89% by POD2. Thirty-one complications occurred, including 4% grade III-IV. In the primary setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-1.00); respectively. In the PC setting, 2-year RFS for seminoma and NSGCT were 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95); respectively. Overall, only 7 patients had in-field recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Midline EP-RPLND is safe, associated with rapid gastrointestinal recovery, short hospital stay, and low complication rates. It also demonstrates acceptable oncologic outcomes in the primary and post-chemotherapy settings, with low rates of in-field relapse.

RESUMEN

Background: Lumbar hernia is a rare disease with low incidence, and no golden standard surgical procedure has been established for lumbar hernias. The single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal sublay (SIL-TES) technique became a novel surgical technique for lumbar hernias. Methods: This retrospective study included 20 patients who underwent SIL-TES repair for lumbar hernia between April 2020 and March 2024. The baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative data, postoperative data, satisfaction score, and Carolina Comfort Scale scores were collected. Results: The results revealed that the SIL-TES technique for lumbar hernia repair is associated with a low complication rate, nonrecurrence, high satisfaction score, and high quality of life after surgery. Conclusions: The SIL-TES technique could be a feasible and effective surgical technique for lumbar hernias. A controlled study is needed for further confirmation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of primary cytoreductive surgery vs interval cytoreductive surgery on International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IV ovarian cancer outcomes remains uncertain and may vary depending on the stage and the location of extraperitoneal metastasis. Emulating target trials through causal assessment, combined with propensity score adjustment, has become a leading method for evaluating interventions using observational data. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of primary vs interval cytoreductive surgery on progression-free and overall survival in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IV ovarian cancer using target trial emulation. STUDY DESIGN: Using the comprehensive French national health insurance database, we emulated a target trial to explore the causal impacts of primary vs interval cytoreductive surgery on stage IV ovarian cancer prognosis (Surgery for Ovarian cancer FIGO 4: SOFI-4). The clone method with inverse probability of censoring weighting was used to adjust for informative censoring and to balance baseline characteristics between the groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the stages and extraperitoneal metastasis locations. The study included patients younger than 75 years of age, in good health condition, who were diagnosed with stage IV ovarian cancer between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. The primary and secondary outcomes were respectively 5-year progression-free survival and 7-year overall survival. RESULTS: Among the 2772 patients included in the study, 948 (34.2%) were classified as having stage IVA ovarian cancer and 1824 (65.8%) were classified as having stage IVB ovarian cancer at inclusion. Primary cytoreductive surgery was performed for 1182 patients (42.6%), whereas interval cytoreductive surgery was conducted for 1590 patients (57.4%). The median progression-free survival for primary cytoreductive surgery was 19.7 months (interquartile range, 19.3-20.1) as opposed to 15.7 months (interquartile range, 15.7-16.1) for those who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery. The median overall survival was 63.1 months (interquartile range, 61.7-65.4) for primary cytoreductive surgery in comparison with 55.6 months (interquartile range, 53.8-56.3) for interval cytoreductive surgery. The findings of our study indicate that primary cytoreductive surgery is associated with a 5.0-month increase in the 5-year progression-free survival (95% confidence interval, 3.8-6.2) and a 3.9-month increase in 7-year overall survival (95% confidence interval, 1.9-6.2). These survival benefits of primary over interval cytoreductive surgery were observed in both the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVA and IVB subgroups. Primary cytoreductive surgery demonstrated improved progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with pleural, supradiaphragmatic, or extra-abdominal lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: This study advocates for the benefits of primary cytoreductive surgery over interval cytoreductive surgery for patients with stage IV ovarian cancer and suggests that extraperitoneal metastases like supradiaphragmatic or extra-abdominal lymph nodes should not automatically preclude primary cytoreductive surgery consideration in suitable patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The totally preperitoneal (TPP) approach is a new concept that was recently introduced. Although the TPP approach combined with single-incision laparoscopic hernia repair has its own advantages, there is little evidence reflecting the characteristics and feasibility of either approach. AIM: To analyze the potential applications of single-incision laparoscopic TPP (SIL-TPP) inguinal hernia hernioplasty for the treatment of inguinal hernias. METHODS: A total of 152 SIL-TPP surgeries were performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University from February 2019 to November 2022. A single-port, named Iconport, and standard laparoscopic instruments were used during the operation. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters and short-term postoperative outcomes were collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The demographic data of 152 patients underwent SIL-TPP were shown in Table 1. The average age was 49.5 years (range from 21 to 81 years). The average body mass index was 27.7 kg/m2 (range from 17.7 kg/m2 to 35.6 kg/m2). SIL-TPP were conducted successfully in 147 patients. Three patients were converted to the SIL-transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at the initial stage of the study due to a lack of experience. In 2 patients with incisional hernias, an auxiliary operation hole was added during the SIL-TPP procedure, as required for surgery. The mean operative time was 64.5 minutes (range: 36.0-110.0 minutes) for unilateral direct and femoral hernias and 81.6 minutes for indirect hernias (range: 40.0-150.0 minutes). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.4 days. CONCLUSION: SIL-TPP is feasible and has advantages for inguinal hernia repair. SIL-TPP has potential benefits for patients with various abdominal wall hernias. Consequently, doctors should be encouraged to actively apply the TPP approach combined with a single incision in their daily work.

RESUMEN

AIM: A minimally invasive surgery (MIS) extraperitoneal (XP) approach to left-sided colorectal resection utilizing the laparoscopic approach has recently been shown to be safe and feasible and to have potential advantages over the transperitoneal approach, especially in high-risk surgical patients. The aim of this article is to provide a first cadaveric demonstration of the use of a single-port robotic platform in performing XP low anterior resection by MIS. METHOD: A single-port robotic platform (DaVinci®SP™) was used to perform XP single-port low anterior resection in two cadavers with body mass indexes (BMIs) of 19 and 40 kg/m2. RESULTS: The single-port robotic platform with versatile arms was successfully used to perform a complete low anterior resection with splenic flexure mobilization and total mesorectal excision through a single port. CONCLUSIONS: A single-port robotic platform enhances complete XP dissection in the supine patient in extreme BMI ranges. Clinical studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Exploration of the efficacy of treating large indirect inguinal hernias in infants and young children using umbilical double-port laparoscopy combined with extraperitoneal water injection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 165 cases of primary unilateral large indirect inguinal hernias in infants and young children treated at our hospital from May 2018 to May 2023. Among them, 90 cases underwent umbilical double-port laparoscopic surgery combined with extraperitoneal water injection and high ligation of the hernia sac (Double-Port Group), and another 75 cases underwent conventional three-port laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac (Three-Port Group). The two groups were compared in terms of operation time, postoperative pain scores at 24 hours, hospital stay, incision complications, and recurrence within one year after surgery. RESULTS: Both groups successfully completed the surgery without any intraoperative complications. The pain score at 24 hours postoperatively was lower in the Double-Port Group compared to the Three-Port Group, and there was no statistically significant difference in operation time, hospital stay, and incision complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Both groups were followed up for one year postoperatively; the Three-Port Group had one recurrence that was cured after further treatment, while there were no recurrences in the Double-Port Group. CONCLUSION: Umbilical double-port laparoscopy combined with extraperitoneal water injection for the treatment of large indirect inguinal hernias in infants and young children has the advantages of being safe and reliable, with concealed and aesthetic incisions, and rapid recovery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To present our technical modifications of single incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) of the internal inguinal ring (IIR) for pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH). METHODS: The prospectively collected data of all children diagnosed with PIH undergoing SILPEC at our center from 2016 to 2023 were reviewed and divided into two groups for result comparison: Group A: before and Group B: after the implementation of full modifications. Our modifications included using a nonabsorbable monofilament suture, creating a peritoneal thermal injury at the internal inguinal ring (IIR), employing a cannula to ensure the suture at the IIR ligates only the peritoneum, and double ligation of the IIR in selected cases. RESULTS: 1755 patients in group A and in group B (1 month to 14 years old) were enrolled. There were no significant differences regarding baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. At a median follow-up of 40 months, the rate of recurrent CIH and subcutaneous stitch granuloma (SSG) was 2.3% and 1.5% in group A vs. 0% and 0% in group B (p < 0.001). There were no hydroceles, no ascended or atrophic testis. CONCLUSIONS: Our SILPEC technical modifications can achieve zero recurrence and zero SSG for PIH.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We report herein a case of a 43-year-old female with a ruptured tubo-ovarian abscess complicated by sepsis and extraperitoneal spillage into the anterior abdominal wall. The patient initially presented with acute abdominal pain and septic shock. Pelvic computed tomography revealed a collection in the abdomen that suggested a ruptured tubo-ovarian abscess, which dissects into the right rectus plane. There was a complete resolution of sepsis following surgical drainage. The patient underwent a hysterectomy with a bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy.

RESUMEN

Background: With the introduction of the da Vinci single-port (SP) robot platform, surgery in a narrow space has become easier, and using this, extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy has been frequently performed recently. However, studies comparing it with existing methods are still lacking. Therefore, in this study, we compared the initial extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (spRARP) with intraperitoneal multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (mpRARP) and tried to investigate the feasibility of extraperitoneal spRARP. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent RARP performed between January 2019 and April 2023. A total of 184 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study: 64 underwent spRARP and 120 underwent mpRARP. Patient characteristics before and after surgery were investigated, and period of passing gas, foley maintenance period, length of hospital stay, and pain changes were compared and analyzed to estimate post-surgery recovery. To address inherent biases stemming from differing patient characteristics at baseline, we performed an additional analysis after propensity score matching (PSM) (ratio, 1:1). Results: After PSM, both the spRARP and mpRARP groups consisted of 64 patients each. On preoperative examination, there were no significant differences in prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score (GS), prostate volume, magnetic resonance imaging T stage, or Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score between the two groups. Following surgery, there were no significant differences in operative and console time between the two groups. Notably, the estimated blood loss was considerably lesser in the spRARP group than in the mpRARP group (P=0.049). When comparing pathologic outcomes, the GS, T stage, positive surgical margin, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion rates showed no significant differences between the two groups. Four patients who underwent spRARP and six who underwent mpRARP suffered Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3 and 4 complications. After 3 months, there were no significant differences in incontinence or potency between the two groups. However, even after PSM, the period of passing gas was earlier in the spRARP group than in the mpRARP group. Conclusions: In this study, both the extraperitoneal spRARP and transperitoneal mpRARP groups exhibited similar complication rates and surgical outcomes. Furthermore, the spRARP group had a short surgical time and demonstrated early recovery. Therefore, extraperitoneal spRARP is a feasible procedure that is expected to become increasingly popular in the future.

RESUMEN

We present a case of a recurrent inguinal bladder hernia that was previously unsuccessfully operated on three times and was repaired using totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). A 79-year-old man presented with a right inguinal swelling that had been treated three times on the same side with anterior approaches. Computed tomography confirmed a recurrent inguinal bladder hernia. TEP was performed after identifying the bladder hernia preoperatively, with previous surgeries that used a plug-and-patch technique through an anterior approach. The extraperitoneal approach allowed the bladder to be reduced without injury and the hernia to be safely repaired using a 3D Max® Light Mesh. The postoperative recovery was uneventful, with no recurrence after 1 year. TEP facilitates the diagnosis and repair of bladder hernias, emphasizing the importance of preoperative diagnosis and the efficacy of endoscopic procedures in bladder hernia repair, even in recurrent cases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Currently, inguinal hernias are highly prevalent in the Brazilian population, accounting for 75% of all abdominal wall hernias. The recommended treatment to correct them is inguinal herniorrhaphy, which can be performed through open surgery, mainly using the Lichtenstein technique, or laparoscopically, primarily through Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP) or Total Extraperitoneal Repair (TEP) approaches. Like any surgery, these procedures have post-operative complications, with pain being the most common and debilitating. Currently, in European and Brazilian guidelines, the open Lichtenstein and endoscopic inguinal hernia techniques are recommended as best evidence-based options for repair of a primary unilateral hernia providing the surgeon is sufficiently experienced in the specific procedure. In that matter, the surgeon should make a choice based on assessment of the benefits and risks of performing each of them, and practice shared making decision with it patient. Therefore, the objective of this review was to assess the incidence of chronic postoperative pain by comparing the aforementioned surgical approaches to evaluate which procedure causes less disability to the patient. METHODS: The search conducted until May 2024 was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane (CENTRAL), and Lilacs databases. The selection was limited to randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TAPP or TEP to LC, evaluating the incidence of chronic postoperative pain published between 2017 and 2023. Evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool, and bias risk was evaluated with the RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS I tool. Thirteen studies were included.  RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the groups in both techniques, favoring the laparoscopic approach, which had a lower occurrence of postoperative inguinodynia with a relative risk of 0.49 (95% CI = 0.32, 0.75; I2 = 66% (P = 0.001); Z = 3.28 (P = 0.001) with low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: The presence of chronic postoperative pain was lower in laparoscopic TEP/TAPP techniques when compared to the open Lichtenstein technique, meaning that the former can bring more benefits to patients who requires inguinal herniorrhaphy. Nevertheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize the analysis, minimizing the bias.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common cause of obstructive azoospermia (OA). Yet, the surgical treatment for this kind of OA remains difficult with poor fertility outcome. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy-assisted microsurgical vasovasostomy (VV) in the treatment of OA caused by pediatric bilateral IHR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 37 patients with OA caused by pediatric bilateral IHR were enrolled in this study from March 2015 to December 2020 in Shanghai General Hospital. The clinical data and fertility outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: All patients enrolled had a history of bilateral IHR at the age of 1-10 years old. The mean age of patients was 27 ± 4.31 (range: 18-35) years. Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy (TEP) was applied in 31 patients for the exploration and retrieval of pelvic vas deferens end, and 30 of them underwent microsurgical VV successfully. Among the six cases where TEP was not applied, five cases underwent microsurgical anastomosis. Intraoperative exploration revealed that the location of vas deferens injuries included scrotum (2.70%, 1/37), inguinal canal (5.41%, 2/37), pelvic cavity (78.37%, 29/37), and multiple sites (13.51%, 5/37). The mean operation time was 339 ± 96.73 min (range: 130-510 min). There were no surgical complications. Thirty-three cases were followed up for 5-48 months with four cases lost to follow-up. The overall patency rate, pregnancy rate, and natural pregnancy rate were 75.86% (22/29), 46.67% (14/30), and 36.84% (7/19, 3 patients without family planning), respectively. And seven couples conceived through the assisted reproductive technique, two of which using fresh sperm in the ejaculate. CONCLUSION: TEP laparoscopy-assisted microscopic VV is an effective treatment for patients with OA caused by pediatric bilateral IHR.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Few cases of intestinal obstruction after colostomy are caused by internal hernia. Some institutions perform stomas through the extraperitoneal route because some patients experience an internal hernia outside the stoma performed through the intraperitoneal route. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 72-year-old woman presented with a history of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). A sigmoid colostomy was performed via the extraperitoneal route during APR. One month after APR, the patient presented to the emergency department of our hospital with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed that the small intestine had passed through the extraperitoneal tunnel, resulting in strangulated intestinal obstruction, and emergency laparotomy was performed. During surgery, the ileum passed behind the elevated sigmoid colon in a caudal-to-cranial direction and formed an unusual closed loop. The strangulated part of the small intestine showed ischemic change; however, the intestine quickly normalized soon after strangulation was released, and the operation was completed without resection of the intestine. DISCUSSION: The major cause of intestinal obstruction after colostomy is intraperitoneal adhesion. Looseness of the elevated sigmoid colon can cause internal hernia, if under pneumoperitoneum, when a colostomy is created through the extraperitoneal route in laparoscopic APR. Furthermore, the patient had lost more than 5 kg of body weight after the surgery, which may have led to the looseness of the elevated sigmoid colon. CONCLUSION: Releasing the pneumoperitoneum during the elevation of the sigmoid colon is necessary to prevent internal hernia, even with a colostomy performed through the extraperitoneal route.1.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic (SIL) technique compared with the traditional three-port total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique for inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: This prospective, randomised study involved patients who underwent surgery for inguinal hernia at our hospital from December 2021 to July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to SIL-TEP or TEP groups based on a computer-generated random number table. Perioperative clinical indicators for the surgical approaches were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 127 patients eligible for study, 66 were randomised to the SIL-TEP group and 61 to the TEP group. The operation time for SIL-TEP was significantly longer than for TEP but the time to return to normal activities was significantly shorter and short-term pain score was significantly lower. There were no differences between groups in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, pain relief time, hospitalization costs or cosmetic satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: While SIL-TEP is more challenging than TEP for hernia repair, we found that at our centre it is comparable with regard to overall safety and feasibility. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.

Asunto(s)