RESUMEN

Introduction: Etelcalcetide is an i.v. calcimimetic agent, effectively reducing parathyroid hormone levels in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The clinical impact of discontinuing etelcalcetide at the time of kidney transplantation is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients on HD meeting predefined criteria who received a kidney transplant at our institution between January 1, 2015, and December 12, 2022. The incidence of parathyroidectomy and the evolution of calcium, phosphate, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels after transplantation was analyzed according to the type of calcimimetic treatment before transplantation (cinacalcet vs. etelcalcetide vs. none). Results: Overall, 372 patients (aged 53 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 42-62 years) were included. At the time of transplantation, 35, 75, and 262 patients were under etelcalcetide, cinacalcet, or no calcimimetic, respectively. After 1064 (IQR: 367-1658) days, the incidences of parathyroidectomy in the etelcalcetide, cinacalcet, no calcimimetic groups were 29%, 12%, and 1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Etelcalcetide was associated with an increased incidence of parathyroidectomy after adjustment for age, sex, and HD vintage (hazard ratio [HR]: 97.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.1-493.9, P < 0.001). The incidence of parathyroidectomy was related to etelcalcetide dosage (6/11 [54.6%] in patients with ≥ 10 mg vs. 4/24 [16.7%] in patients with < 10 mg, P = 0.02). Moreover, peak calcium levels were higher (P < 0.001) and parathyroidectomy was performed earlier (median 80 vs. 480 days, P < 0.001) in the etelcalcetide compared with the cinacalcet group. Long-term graft function, graft loss, and mortality were similar. Conclusion: Etelcalcetide use during maintenance HD is associated with an increased incidence of early parathyroidectomy after transplantation compared to cinacalcet or no calcimimetic.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) poses a common condition among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to the chronic stimulation of the parathyroid glands as a result of persistently low calcium levels. As a first option for medical treatment, vitamin D receptor analogs (VDRAs) and calcimimetic agents are generally used. Apart from cinacalcet, which is orally taken, in recent years, another calcimimetic agent, etelcalcetide, is being administered intravenously during dialysis. Materials and Methods: In a 5-year retrospective study between 2018 and 2023, 52 patients undergoing dialysis were studied. The aim of this study is to highlight the possible effects and/or benefits that intravenously administered calcimimetic agents have on CKD patients. A total of 34 patients (65.4%) received cinacalcet and etelcalcetide while parathormone (PTH) and calcium serum levels were monitored on a monthly basis. Results: A total of 29 out of 33 patients (87.9%) that received treatment with etelcalcetide showed a significant decrease in PTH levels, which rose up to 57% compared to the initial values. None of the included patients needed to undergo parathyroidectomy (PTx) due to either extremely high and persistent PTH levels or severe side effects of the medications. It is generally strongly advised that parathyroidectomies should be performed by an expert surgical team. In recent years, a significant decrease in parathyroidectomies has been recorded globally, a fact that is mainly linked to the constantly wider use of new calcimimetic agents. This decrease in parathyroidectomies has resulted in an important decrease in complications occurring in cervical surgeries (e.g., perioperative hemorrhage and nerve damage). Conslusions: Despite the fact that these surgical complications cannot be easily compared to the pharmaceutical side effects, the recorded decrease in parathyroidectomies is considered to be notable, especially in cases of relapse where a difficult reoperation would be considered based on previously published guidelines.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic kidney disease-induced secondary hyperparathyroidism (CKD-SHPT) heightens fracture risk through impaired mineral homeostasis and elevated levels of uremic toxins (UTs), which in turn enhance bone remodeling. Etelcalcetide (Etel), a calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) agonist, suppresses parathyroid hormone (PTH) in hyperparathyroidism to reduce excessive bone resorption, leading to increased bone mass. However, Etel's effect on bone quality, chemical composition, and strength is not well understood. To address these gaps, we established a CKD-SHPT rat model and administered Etel at a human-equivalent dose concurrently with disease induction. The effects on bone and mineral homeostasis were compared with a CKD-SHPT (vehicle-treated group) and a control group (rats without SHPT). Compared with vehicle-treated CKD-SHPT rats, Etel treatment improved renal function, reduced circulating UT levels, improved mineral homeostasis parameters, decreased PTH levels, and prevented mineralization defects. The upregulation of mineralization-promoting genes by Etel in CKD-SHPT rats might explain its ability to prevent mineralization defects. Etel preserved both trabecular and cortical bones with attendant suppression of osteoclast function, besides increasing mineralization. Etel maintained the number of viable osteocytes to the control level, which could also contribute to its beneficial effects on bone. CKD-SHPT rats displayed increased carbonate substitution of matrix and mineral, decreased crystallinity, mineral-to-matrix ratio, and collagen maturity, and these changes were mitigated by Etel. Further, Etel treatment prevented CKD-SHPT-induced deterioration in bone strength and mechanical behavior. Based on these findings, we conclude that in CKD-SHPT rats, Etel has multiscale beneficial effects on bone that involve remodeling suppression, mineralization gene upregulation, and preservation of osteocytes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE To explore and analyze the adverse drug event （ADE） signals of cinacalcet and etelcalcetide， to provide a reference for safe drug use in the clinic. METHODS ADE reports related to cinacalcet and etelcalcetide were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from January 1st， 2004 to June 30th， 2023 using the OpenVigil online tool. The Bayesian confidence propagation neural network method was adopted to detect the signals of ADE from the key organ systems. The signals were encoded according to the preferred term in the ADE terminology set of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities （26.0 edition）. RESULTS A total 41 709 and 1 710 ADE reports were extracted， and 29 and 45 safety signals were detected in key systems for cinacalcet and etelcalcetide， respectively； 20 and 36 positive signals were not included in the drug instructions. Hypocalcemia/decreased serum calcium， abnormal blood parathyroid hormone （PTH）/increased or decreased serum PTH were common ADEs of the two drugs， which were detected in the study. Among the signals not included in the drug instructions， new moderate and strong signals were detected， such as cinacalcet-induced calcification defense （metabolic and nutritional diseases）， bone starvation syndrome and high conversion bone diseases （musculoskeletal and connective tissue diseases） as well as etelcalcetide-induced sudden death， necrosis and treatment of non-responders （general disorders， administration site）， unstable angina pectoris， myocardial ischemia （cardiac diseases）， intestinal perforation， gastric antrum vasodilation and gastric ulcer （gastrointestinal diseases）. CONCLUSIONS In the clinical application of the two drugs， apart from the common ADEs such as hypocalcemia and abnormal blood PTH， the surveillance of some new potential ADEs should also be carried out， such as bone starvation syndrome， calcification defense， ventricular disease and other cinacalcet-induced ADEs， sudden death， myocardial ischemia， unstable angina pectoris， intestinal perforation， gastric ulcer and other etecalcetide-induced ADEs. If new ADEs appear， clinic should promptly assess the benefits and risks， and update the treatment plan and pharmacological monitoring plan to ensure the safety of patient medication.

RESUMEN

Introduction Chronic kidney disease-related mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD), characterized by abnormalities in calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone metabolism, with impaired bone turnover and extravascular calcification is a known complication of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) develops early in the disease and its prevalence gradually increases with the disease progression, becoming almost universal in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The treatment for SHPT includes synthetic vitamin D analogs, calcitriol or calcimimetics. Recently, intravenous etelcalcetide was introduced as a second-generation calcimimetic. This article provides the real-world experience of using etelcalcetide in multiethnic Asian patients receiving hemodialysis at community-based hemodialysis centers in Singapore. Methods This study was real-world evidence, generated by a retrospective clinical audit of routine clinical care of hemodialysis patients in community-based centers in Singapore who received etelcalcetide for treating SHPT. The information on the starting and maximum dose of etelcalcetide, duration of treatment on hemodialysis, parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, dialysate calcium, concomitant medications, and reasons for discontinuation were collected from the medical records. PTH levels were collected at four-, eight-, and twelve-month intervals. Results A total of 148 patients received etelcalcetide during the study period. Ten patients died and twenty discontinued their treatment, with 118 patients remaining on treatment. Demographically, the patients included Chinese, Malay, Indians, and those belonging to other racial groups. The starting dose of etelcalcetide ranged from 2.5 mg once per week to 7.5 mg three times a week. There was a 16.8% reduction (p=<0.001) in intact-PTH after four months of therapy. Target intact-PTH level of less than 60 pmol/L, was reported as 1.4% at baseline, with 22.3% at four months (p<0.001) and 25.9% at eight months (p=0.028). Calcium and phosphate levels were also tracked as part of the safety and efficacy measures of using etelcalcetide. No symptomatic hypocalcemia was noted and phosphate levels were noted to decline significantly. Overall, the calcium-phosphate product reduced at four months (13.2%, p=<0.001) and eight months (12.7%, p<0.05). An analysis of concomitant medication usage, dialysate calcium utilized, and the side effects of etelcalcetide were also recorded. Finally, a brief descriptive analysis of the patient's subjective feedback regarding etelcalcetide was also reported, especially regarding the reduction in pill burden and overall compliance to medications. Conclusion Etelcalcetide is safe and effective for treating SHPT in multi-ethnic Asian hemodialysis patients and can be considered an alternative to oral cinacalcet. Our study showed no side effects, which was one of the key reasons for non-compliance to traditional calcimimetics. A favorable compliance profile with reduced pill burden was noted by using this intravenous calcimimetic.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Calcimimetic therapy with etelcalcetide (ETEL) has been shown to attenuate the advancement of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in hemodialysis patients measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of the study was to evaluate whether this effect is accompanied by alterations in LV function and myocardial composition. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a randomized-controlled trial of ETEL versus Alfacalcidol (ALFA) in 62 hemodialysis patients. LV function was assessed using LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) on feature-tracking (FT) CMR. Myocardial tissue characteristics were analyzed using parametric T1 and T2 mapping. RESULTS: Of the total study cohort (n = 62), 48 subjects completed both CMR scans with sufficient quality for FT analysis. In the one-year follow-up, LV GLS deteriorated in the ALFA group, whereas the ETEL group remained stable (LV GLS change: + 2.6 ± 4.6 versus + 0.3 ± 3.8; p = 0.045 when adjusting for randomization factors and baseline LV GLS). We did not observe a difference in the change of LVEF between the two groups (p = 0.513). The impact of ETEL treatment on LV GLS over time remained significant after additional adjustment for the change in LV mass during the study period. ETEL treatment did not significantly affect other CMR parameters. There were no changes in myocardial composition between treatment groups (T1 time change: + 15 ± 42 versus + 10 ± 50; p = 0.411; T2 time change: - 0.13 ± 2.45 versus - 0.70 ± 2.43; p = 0.652). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing hemodialysis, treatment with ETEL was protective against deterioration of LV longitudinal function, as evaluated through FT CMR, when compared to the control therapy of ALFA. This effect was not mediated by the change in LV mass. Trial registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03182699 . Unique identifier: NCT03182699.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Increased left atrial (LA) size is a risk factor for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. It is closely related to left ventricular hypertrophy and chronic volume overload, both of which are common in hemodialysis. Calcimimetic treatment with etelcalcetide (ETL) previously showed an inhibitory effect on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) progression in this population. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the EtECAR-HD trial, where 62 patients were randomized to ETL or alfacalcidol (ALFA) for 1 year. LA volume index (LAVI) was measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of the study was to investigate whether ETL was associated with a change of LAVI. RESULTS: Median baseline levels of LAVI were 40 mL/m2 (31, 54 IQR) in the ETL group and 36 mL/m2 (26, 46 IQR) in the ALFA group. In the ITT population, the change of LAVI was 5.0 mL/m2 [95% CI: -0.04, 10] lower under ETL, compared to ALFA (p = 0.052, R2adj = 0.259). In the PP population, the difference in LAVI changes widened to 5.8 [95% CI: 0.36, 11], p = 0.037, R2adj = 0.302). Secondary analysis showed that the study delta of LVMI was correlated with the LAVI delta (r = 0.387) and that an inclusion of LVMI delta in the ANCOVA model mediated the effect on LAVI delta to ß = 3.3 [95% CI: -0.04, 10] (p = 0.2, R2adj = 0.323). The same could not be observed for parameters assessing the volume status. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that ETL could inhibit LAVI progression compared with ALFA. This effect was mediated by the change of LVMI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: There is scarce clinical experience with etelcalcetide in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism uncontrolled with cinacalcet. The effect of etelcalcetide on serum sclerostin levels remains to be clarified. Materials and methods: Prospective cohort study in prevalent hemodialysis patients with uncontrolled sHPT under cinacalcet for at least 3 months, mean parathyroid hormone (PTH)>800pg/mL and calcium (Ca)>8.3mg/dL. Etelcalcetide 5mg IV/HD was initiated after cinacalcet washout. Levels of PTH, Ca, and phosphorus (Pi) followed monthly for 6 months. Plasma sclerostin levels measured before etelcalcetide treatment and after 6 months. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, 19 (55.9%) male gender. Mean age 60.7 (± 12.3) years; median time on HD 82.5 (7–296) months and median cinacalcet dose was 180mg/week (Interquartile Range: 180–270). Serum Ca, Pi and PTH levels showed a significant reduction after etelcalcetide treatment from 8.8mg/dL, 5.4mg/dL and 1005pg/mL to 8.1mg/dL (p=0.08), 4.9mg/dL (p=0.01) and 702pg/mL (p<0.001), respectively. Median etelcalcetide dose remained at 5mg/HD. Plasma sclerostin concentration increased from 35.66pmol/L (IQR11.94–54.58) to 71.05pmol/L (IQR54.43–84.91) (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Etelcalcetide improved sHPT control in this group of patients, previously under cinacalcet treatment, and significantly increased plasma sclerostin concentration. The impact of etelcalcetide treatment on sclerostin levels is a novel finding. (AU)

Introducción: Existe escasa experiencia clínica sobre el uso de etelcalcetida en pacientes con hiperparatiroidismo secundario no controlado con cinacalcet. Asimismo, el efecto de la etelcalcetida sobre los niveles de esclerostina aún no ha sido aclarado. Materiales y métodos: Realizamos un estudio de cohorte prospectivo en pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD) con hiperparatiroidismo secundario no controlado con cinacalcet durante al menos 3 meses, hormona paratiroidea media> 800 pg/ml y calcio (Ca)> 8,3mg/dl. Tras un periodo de lavado, se inició administración intravenosa de etelcalcetida 5mg/HD y se realizó un seguimiento mensual de los niveles de hormona paratiroidea, Ca y fósforo (Pi) durante 6 meses. Además, los niveles de esclerostina plasmática fueron medidos antes del tratamiento con etelcalcetida y después de 6 meses. Resultados: Se incluyeron 34 pacientes, 19 (55,9%) de sexo masculino. Edad media 60,7±12,3 años; la mediana de tiempo en HD fue 82,5 (7-296) meses y la mediana de la dosis de cinacalcet fue de 180mg/semana (rango intercuartílico 180-270). Los niveles séricos de Ca, Pi y hormona paratiroidea mostraron una reducción significativa después del tratamiento con etelcalcetida desde 8,8mg/dl, 5,4mg/dl y 1005 pg/ml hasta 8,1mg/dl (p=0,08), 4,9mg/dl (p=0,01) y 702 pg/mL (p<0,001) respectivamente. La dosis media de etelcalcetida se mantuvo en 5mg/HD. La concentración de esclerostina plasmática aumentó de 35,66pmol/L (rango intercuartílico 11,94-54,58) a 71,05pmol/L (rango intercuartílico 54,43-84,91; p <0,0001). Conclusión: En este grupo de pacientes previamente en tratamiento con cinacalcet, la etelcalcetida mejoró el control de hiperparatiroidismo secundario y resultó en un aumento de la concentración plasmática de esclerostina. El efecto del tratamiento con etelcalcetida sobre los niveles de esclerostina es un hallazgo novedoso. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSES OF REVIEW: With chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) and mineral and bone metabolism disease (MBD) almost inevitably develop and result in renal osteodystrophy and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Together with active vitamin D, calcimimetics are the main therapy for sHPT in CKD. This review provides an overview of the therapeutic effects of oral cinacalcet and intravenous etelcalcetide on CKD-MBD and vascular disease, with a focus on pediatric dialysis patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Randomized controlled trials in adults and children demonstrate efficient lowering of parathyroid hormone (PTH) by the calcimimetics together with a reduction in serum calcium and phosphate when combined with low-dose active vitamin D, while therapy with active vitamin D analogs alone increases serum calcium and phosphate. Cinacalcet and etelcalcetide both improve bone formation and correct adynamic bone, i.e., have a direct bone anabolic effect. They decrease serum calciprotein particles, which are involved in endothelial dysfunction, atherogenesis, and vascular calcification. Clinical trials in adults suggest a modest slowing of the progression of cardiovascular calcification with cinacalcet. Calcimimetic agents represent a major pharmacological tool for improved control of CKD-MBD, by efficiently counteracting sHPT and allowing for better control of calcium/phosphate and bone homeostasis. Albeit definite evidence is lacking, the beneficial effects of calcimimetics on CVD are promising. Routine use of cinacalcet has been suggested in children.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRD) or dialysis frequently suffer from secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPTH), a severe complication of mineral metabolism disorders. The calcimimetic etelcalcetide has been approved and shown efficacy in randomized controlled trials, however, data are limited from real-life studies. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term use etelcalcetide for the treatment of sHPTH (PTH > 600 pg/mL) in patients undergoing extracorporeal hemodialysis for ESRD for at least 2 years. METHODS: In 45 patients, we administered etelcalcetide for the treatment of sHPTH (PTH > 600 pg/mL); One group of patients (control group, Group A; N = 26) were previously treated with intravenous vitamin D analogues only (paricalcitol 5 µg/ml, three times/week) and then treated with etelcalcetide and a second group of patients already on cinacalcet therapy for at least six months in combination with iv paricalcitol were switched to etelcalcetide (Group B, N = 19). RESULTS: PTH levels decreased over time in both groups of patients, with higher values for patients previously treated with cinacalcet (Group B) compared to Group A for the entire study duration even if the final value of the two groups was comparable. After 12 months, the percentage of subjects who had PTH concentrations within the targets recommended by KDIGO guidelines was 87% in Group A and 58% in Group B. In seven patients, despite a parathyroid gland volume > 1000 mm3, an adequate response in the reduction of PTH was obtained. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study demonstrate that the efficacy of etelcalcetide is maintained over the long term.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is scarce clinical experience with etelcalcetide in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism uncontrolled with cinacalcet. The effect of etelcalcetide on serum sclerostin levels remains to be clarified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study in prevalent hemodialysis patients with uncontrolled sHPT under cinacalcet for at least 3 months, mean parathyroid hormone (PTH)>800pg/mL and calcium (Ca)>8.3mg/dL. Etelcalcetide 5mg IV/HD was initiated after cinacalcet washout. Levels of PTH, Ca, and phosphorus (Pi) followed monthly for 6 months. Plasma sclerostin levels measured before etelcalcetide treatment and after 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, 19 (55.9%) male gender. Mean age 60.7 (± 12.3) years; median time on HD 82.5 (7-296) months and median cinacalcet dose was 180mg/week (Interquartile Range: 180-270). Serum Ca, Pi and PTH levels showed a significant reduction after etelcalcetide treatment from 8.8mg/dL, 5.4mg/dL and 1005pg/mL to 8.1mg/dL (p=0.08), 4.9mg/dL (p=0.01) and 702pg/mL (p<0.001), respectively. Median etelcalcetide dose remained at 5mg/HD. Plasma sclerostin concentration increased from 35.66pmol/L (IQR11.94-54.58) to 71.05pmol/L (IQR54.43-84.91) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Etelcalcetide improved sHPT control in this group of patients, previously under cinacalcet treatment, and significantly increased plasma sclerostin concentration. The impact of etelcalcetide treatment on sclerostin levels is a novel finding.

RESUMEN

Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) complicated by secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is associated with an increased risk of fragility fractures. Etelcalcetide (EC) is a treatment for SHPT that reduces serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. However, the effects of combined treatment with osteoporosis drugs such as teriparatide (TPTD) remain unclear. This study investigates the combined effects of EC and TPTD on bone in CKD model rats. Methods: The CKD model was established in 8-week-old male Wistar rats by feeding them a 0.75% adenine diet for 4 weeks. At 20 weeks of age, the rats were divided into 4 groups (N = 9-10 in each group): CKD group (vehicle administration), TPTD group (30 µg/kg, 3 times/week), EC group (0.6 mg/kg, daily), and Comb group (TPTD and EC combined). EC was injected for 12 weeks starting at 20 weeks of age, and TPTD was injected for 8 weeks starting at 24 weeks of age. After treatment, the followings were evaluated: bone mineral density, bone strength, biochemical tests, bone and fat histomorphometry, and micro-computed tomography. Results: In CKD model rats, the combination of EC and TPTD was more effective in increasing cortical bone thickness and bone strength and inhibiting porosity. In addition, the combined treatment decreased bone marrow adiposity and fibrosis, and it increased bone mass and improved bone microstructure in trabecular bone. Conclusions: With the observed benefits such as improved bone mass, bone strength, structural properties, and bone marrow adiposity, combination therapy may be a potential way to improve bone fragility in CKD.

RESUMEN

This quality improvement project was implemented to improve renal hyperparathyroidism in patients with end stage kidney disease who are on hemodialysis through the implementation of a nurse-led etelcalcetide protocol. Results showed that the post-intervention group had a 16.7% increase of the intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) range within the target goal compared to the 3-month pre-intervention assessment (95% CI; 20.3% to 48.1%). The odds of being in the PTH target range were 1.73 times higher after the 3-month intervention than measurements obtained before starting the intervention (95% CI for the odds ratio: 0.29 to 10.3). Despite the lack of statistical significance (p = 0.688) due to a small sample size, there was an improvement in reaching goal PTH levels. Further studies are needed to analyze the effectiveness of nurse-led protocols in treating renal hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a new calcimimetic, Etelcalcetide, on secondary hyperparathyroidism and its effects in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) compared with hemodialysis (HD) patients not treated with calcimimetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort study included 203 ESRD patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) who received HD treatment. Total number patients were randomly to two groups. The main group (n=71) included HD patients treated by new calcimimetic Etelcalcetide. The historical group (n=132) was evaluated retrospectively and included patients who had SHPT but did not receive calcimimetic treatment. Serum levels of phosphorus, calcium and parathyroid hormone were compared for 12 months. The primary endpoint of the study was death from any cause, surrogates - cases of fractures, parathyroidectomy, death from cardiovascular (CV) events. RESULTS: The dose of Etelcalcetide changed monthly and averaged 8.58±1.79 mg. The dynamics of parathormone (PTH) indicators showed that the decrease in PTH levels by 30% from basal occurred after 3 months of treatment in 39 (54.9%) and 12 (9.1%) patients of the main group and historical group, respectively (p<0.0001). At the end of the study, the target PTH level reached in 52 (73.2%) patients in the main group and only 14 (10.6%) in the comparison group (p<0.0001). In addition to the decrease in serum PTH content, in the main group of patients, there was also a decrease in serum calcium and phosphorus levels. During the time to be analyzed, 36 deaths were reported, 61.1% of which were fatal CV events. The proportion of CV events in the mortality structure is more than 70% higher in the historical group than in the group of patients treated with Etelcalcetide, and is 69,2% vs 40,0%, respectively. The frequency of fractures is almost three times higher in the historical than in the main group of patients. The proportion of patients who required parathyroidectomy was significantly more than three times higher in the historical group than in the main group (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, we demonstrated the high efficacy of Etelcalcetide in the treatment of SHPT in hemodialysis patients. Treatment of SHPT with the inclusion of Etelcalcetide is accompanied by improved clinical outcomes such as the incidence of bone fractures, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: Recently, we demonstrated the efficacy of etelcalcetide in the control of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate changes in fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23) and calciprotein particles (CPPs) after treatment with calcimimetics. METHODS: The DUET trial was a 12-week multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized (1:1:1) study with patients treated with etelcalcetide plus active vitamin D (E + D group; n = 41), etelcalcetide plus oral calcium (E + Ca group; n = 41), or control (C group; n = 42) under maintenance haemodialysis. Serum levels of FGF23 and CPPs were measured at baseline, and 6 and 12 weeks after the start. RESULTS: In the linear mixed model, serum levels of FGF23 in etelcalcetide users were significantly lower than those in non-users at week 6 (p < .001) and week 12 (p < .001). When compared the difference between the E + Ca group and the E + D group, serum levels of FGF23 in the E + Ca group were significantly lower than those in the E + D group at week 12 (p = .017). There were no significant differences in the serum levels of CPPs between etelcalcetide users and non-users at week 6 and week 12, while CPPs in the E + Ca group were significantly lower than those in the E + D group (p < .001) at week 12. CONCLUSION: Etelcalcetide may be useful through suppression of FGF23 levels among haemodialysis patients with SHPT. When correcting hypocalcaemia, loading oral calcium preparations could be more advantageous than active vitamin D for the suppression of both FGF23 and CPPs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Rationale & Objective: Some US hemodialysis (HD) facilities switched from oral cinacalcet to intravenous etelcalcetide as the primary calcimimetic therapy to control parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels after the introduction of etelcalcetide in 2017. Although clinical trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy of etelcalcetide versus cinacalcet, evidence comparing real-world effectiveness is lacking. Study Design: Prospective cohort. Setting & Participants: Patients receiving HD enrolled in US Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study facilities. Exposure: We classified HD facilities on the basis of whether >75% of calcimimetic users were prescribed etelcalcetide ("etelcalcetide-first") or cinacalcet ("cinacalcet-first") from March-August 2019. Outcomes: PTH, calcium, and phosphorus levels among calcimimetic users, all averaged in the 6 months after the exposure assessment period. Analytical Approach: We used adjusted linear regression to compare outcomes using 2 approaches: (1) cross-sectional comparison of etelcalcetide-first and cinacalcet-first HD facilities; (2) pre-post comparison of HD facilities that switched from cinacalcet-first to etelcalcetide-first using facilities that remained cinacalcet-first as a comparison group. Results: We identified 45 etelcalcetide-first and 67 cinacalcet-first HD facilities; etelcalcetide-first (vs cinacalcet-first) facilities were more likely to be from small or independent dialysis organizations (86% vs 22%) and had higher total calcimimetic use (43% vs 29%) and lower active vitamin D use (66% vs 82%). In the cross-sectional analysis comparing etelcalcetide-first and cinacalcet-first HD facilities, the adjusted mean difference in PTH levels was -115 pg/mL (95% CI, -196 to -34) and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL was lower (prevalence difference, -11.4%; 95% CI, -19.3% to -3.5%). Among facilities that switched to etelcalcetide-first, the mean PTH level decreased from 671 to 484 pg/mL and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL decreased from 39% to 21%. Among facilities that remained cinacalcet-first, the mean PTH level increased from 632 to 698 pg/mL and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL increased from 37% to 43%. The adjusted difference-in-difference between the switch to etelcalcetide-first and the continuation of cinacalcet-first was -169 pg/mL (-249 to -90 pg/mL) for the mean PTH and -14.4% (-22.0% to -6.8%) for a PTH level of >600 pg/mL. We also observed slightly lower serum calcium levels and minimal differences in serum phosphorus levels between the etelcalcetide-first and the cinacalcet-first facilities. Limitations: Residual confounding. Conclusions: We observed better PTH control in HD facilities that switched from using cinacalcet to etelcalcetide as the primary calcimimetic therapy. Further research is needed to investigate how the greater real-world effectiveness of intravenous etelcalcetide (vs oral cinacalcet) may affect clinical outcomes.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) leads to increased bone fragility and risk of fracture. Cortical deteriorations, including cortical porosity, are key factors in fracture susceptibility in CKD. Since secondary hyperparathyroidism is common in CKD individuals and contributes to cortical deterioration, we hypothesized that reducing parathyroid hormone (PTH) may modulate CKD-induced cortical porosity. The goal of this pilot study was to assess the effects of lowering PTH, via the preclinical analogue of the FDA-approved calcimimetic etelcalcetide (KP-2326), on the development and progression of cortical pores in the setting of CKD. METHODS: Male Cy/+ Sprague Dawley rats with clinical biochemistries consistent with CKD (N = 8) were assigned to the study. At 30-32 weeks of age, cortical bone was assessed via In vivo µCT and blood collected for biochemistries to create baseline measures. Calcimimetic treatment with KP-2326 (KP) was then administered 3× weekly for 2-4 weeks. Cortical bone and biochemical parameters were repeated at study endpoint (33-37 wks of age). A group of age- and cohort-matched CKD rats (N = 4) were utilized as untreated controls. RESULTS: Untreated CKD rats had significantly increased cortical porosity over time, while porosity in KP-treated CKD rats was not significantly changed over time. Individual pore analysis revealed that pore area was significantly higher for expanding pores in untreated CKD rats compared to KP-treated CKD rats. Mechanical properties of KP-treated animal femora were similar to historical values of age-matched CKD animals and lower than those of age-matched non-diseased animals. CONCLUSION: Our pilot preclinical study demonstrates that etelcalcetide treatment can mitigate the progression of cortical bone changes in an animal model of CKD through suppression of pre-existing cortical pore expansion and limiting the size of new pore development. While stabilization of porosity is beneficial it remains likely that infilling of porosity will be needed to positively affect mechanical properties of bones in the setting of CKD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in dialysis is common. A young man on chronic hemodialysis with SHPT developed pancytopenia with resistant anemia requiring transfusions. A bone marrow biopsy showed grade 3 fibrosis, depleted cellularity, osteosclerosis, and decreased myelopoiesis. He initiated Etelcalcetide 7⋅5 mg 3 times weekly with improvement in SHPT concomitant with near normalization of blood counts. Marrow biopsy at 12 months showed clearance of marrow reticulin, improvement of osteosclerosis and normalization of bone trabeculae, cellularity and myelopoiesis. This is a unique case in which Etelcalcetide treatment is comparable to parathyroidectomy on SHPT and is associated with significant improvement in severe myelofibrosis.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Phosphorus levels in the range seen clinically among patients undergoing dialysis have been reported to attenuate calcium receptor activation and modify parathyroid hormone (PTH) release from isolated parathyroid glands in vitro. Some clinicians and providers of dialysis thus have suggested that calcimimetic agents are ineffective and should not be used to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism among those undergoing dialysis when serum phosphorus concentrations exceed certain threshold levels. METHODS: To determine whether hyperphosphatemia diminishes the therapeutic response to calcimimetic agents, we used data from large clinical trials to analyze the effects of etelcalcetide and cinacalcet to lower plasma PTH levels in individuals on hemodialysis who had secondary hyperparathyroidism and varying degrees of hyperphosphatemia. RESULTS: Plasma PTH levels declined progressively during 26 weeks of treatment with either etelcalcetide or cinacalcet without regard to the degree of hyperphosphatemia at baseline. However, with each calcimimetic agent, the decreases in PTH from baseline were less at each interval of follow-up during the trials among participants with serum phosphorus levels above one of three prespecified threshold values compared with those with serum phosphorus levels below these thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: These in vivo findings are the first in humans to support the idea that hyperphosphatemia attenuates calcium receptor activation by calcium ions and by calcimimetic agents. The effect of hyperphosphatemia on the responsiveness to calcimimetic agents appears relatively modest, however, and unlikely to be significant therapeutically. The efficacy of treatment with calcimimetic agents for lowering plasma PTH levels among those with secondary hyperparathyroidism remains robust despite substantial elevations in serum phosphorus.

Asunto(s)