RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study presented an innovative technique in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) for overlap esophagojejunostomy (E-J), termed self-pulling and latter transection (SPLT) (overlap SPLT). It evaluated the effectiveness and short-term outcomes of this novel method through a comparative analysis with the established functional end-to-end (FETE) E-J incorporating SPLT. METHODS: From September 2018 to September 2023, this study enrolled 68 patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLTG with overlap SPLT anastomosis and 120 patients who underwent TLTG with FETE SPLT anastomosis. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical and postoperative outcomes data for overlap SPLT cases were gathered and retrospectively compared with those from FETE SPLT TLTG to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical safety. RESULTS: The duration of anastomosis for overlap SPLT was 25.3 ± 7.4 minutes, significantly longer than that for the FETE SPLT (18.1 ± 4.0 minutes, P = .031). Perioperatively, 1 anastomosis-related complication occurred in each group, but this did not constitute a statistically significant difference (P = .682). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, postoperative hospital stay, operative cost, surgical margins, or number of lymph nodes removed. Postoperative morbidity rates were similar between the groups (4.4% vs 5.8%, P = .676). CONCLUSION: The overlap SPLT technique is regarded as a safe and feasible method for anastomosis. There were no apparent differences in complications between overlap SPLT and FETE SPLT, but overlap SPLT costed 1 additional stapler cartridge and required a longer duration.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The hemidouble stapler technique (HDST) in laparoscopic intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy has aspects that pose risks to the safety of the anastomosis. We developed a new esophagojejunostomy technique that converts a double-stapled anastomosis to a single-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). The aim of this study is to compare the results of two techniques. Patients who underwent LTG for gastric cancer in our hospital between October 2016 and May 2022 were included in the study. Patients were retrospectively reviewed in two groups: those who underwent HDST and the ghosting double stapling technique (GDST). Both groups were analysed in terms of demographics, perioperative findings, and postoperative outcomes. The GDST was used in 14 patients. The HDST was used on 16 patients. Two patients in the HDST group whose esophagojejunal anastomosis was not assessed on endoscopic imaging were excluded. The mean total operative times were 292.6 ± 43.7 and 224.3 ± 36.1 min (p < 0.001). The mean times for esophagojejunostomy were 38.6 ± 4.3 and 26.8 ± 6.4 min (p < 0.001). One case of anastomotic stenosis was observed in the HDST group. Anastomotic leakage was not observed in both groups. However, there was no significant difference in overall morbidity between the groups (p > 0.05). Both HDST and GDST can be safely performed in the esophagojejunostomy for LTG.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognostic implication of hand-sewn anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: Retrospective analysis is adopted to the clinicopathologic data of 112 patients with gastric cancer (GC) who went through LTG in the Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between October 2020 and October 2022. Among them, 60 individuals receiving medical care were split into the hand-sewn anastomosis group (Group H, N = 60); while, 52 individuals were split into the circular stapler anastomosis group (Group C, N = 52) The clinical efficacy and prognostic conditions of hand-sewn anastomosis are compared with those of circular stapler anastomosis in the application of LTG. RESULTS: The analysis results indicated that no notable difference was observed in intraoperative bleeding volume, time to first flatus (TFF), postoperative hospitalization duration and postoperative complications among the two groups (P > 0.05). Group H had shorter esophagojejunal anastomosis duration (20.0 min vs. 35.0 min) and surgery duration (252.6 ± 19.4 min vs. 265.9 ± 19.8 min), smaller incisions (5.0 cm vs. 10.5 cm), and lower hospitalization costs (58415.0 CNY vs. 63382.5 CNY) compared to Group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy and the postoperative complications of hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy are basically equivalent in comparison to the circular stapler anastomosis in the application of LTG. Its advantage lies in shorter esophagojejunal anastomosis duration, shorter surgery duration, smaller incisions, lower hospitalization costs and wider adaptability of the location of the tumor.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTORODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: The incidence of anastomotic leakage in the esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy is a serious complication of this procedure. Here, we report a case in which a fully covered stent was endoscopically placed into a fistula caused by anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: An 88-year-old man diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer had tumor invasion close to the esophagogastric junction. We performed a laparoscopic total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction. On postoperative day (POD) 3, the patient experienced septic shock due to anastomotic leakage and subsequent mediastinitis. Mediastinal irrigation and drainage under laparotomy were performed. Sepsis improved with drainage, but the fistula persisted due to anastomotic leakage. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Based on a diagnosis of refractory fistula, a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (HANAROSTENT® Esophagus) was inserted POD 21 using esophagoscopy. To prevent stent migration, a 3-0 silk thread was attached to the ostial side of the stent and fixed at the nose. The stent was endoscopically removed 36 days. Esophagoscopy after stent removal revealed that the fistula had resolved and that the anastomotic leakage had healed. The patient started oral intake and was discharged home. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the potential for use of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent with an anchoring thread for anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

RESUMEN

The authors describe 2 patients with rare gastric diseases and indications for gastrectomy with delayed esophagojejunostomy for objective causes. In one case, they could not determine extent of resection, and other patient had hemorrhagic shock. Damage control principle was applied in both cases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EJ) in the context of laparoscopic total gastrectomy remains a complex and technically demanding procedure. We have previously introduced a novel method of intracorporeal circular stapled EJ utilizing a conventional purse-string suture instrument. Since May 2018, we have refined this technique, and the aim of this study was to assess its safety and efficacy. Methods: Between May 2018 and June 2022, we enrolled 92 patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with the modified intracorporeal reconstruction method. In addition, between March 2014 and June 2022, we enrolled 121 patients who underwent the procedure with the extracorporeal reconstruction method. We retrospectively collected and compared the clinical data of these 2 patient cohorts. Results: Intracorporeal reconstruction group experienced lower postoperative pain scores (2.7 ± 1.3 versus 4.5 ± 1.4, P = .032), reduced administration of analgesics (3.1 ± 2.2 versus 5.0 ± 3.5, P = .041), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (4.9 ± 2.3 versus 6.3 ± 3.5, P = .045) compared with the extracorporeal reconstruction group. In addition, anastomotic time and postoperative pain score were not increased in the overweight patients in the intracorporeal reconstruction group. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 (2.2%) patients in the intracorporeal reconstruction group and 4 (3.3%) patients in the extracorporeal reconstruction group. Anastomotic stricture occurred in 1 (1.1% and 0.8%) patient in each group. There was no significant difference in the overall postoperative complication rate between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The modified intracorporeal purse-string stapling technique for EJ during laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a safe and viable option, exhibiting less invasiveness and comparable outcomes to the extracorporeal reconstruction method, especially suitable for obese patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: The most common intrathoracic anastomosis techniques for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) are the overlap and transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) methods. However, the criteria for choosing between these two methods require further study. Aim: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of overlap versus OrVil anastomosis in transabdominal radical surgery for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Material and methods: A total of 34 patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent transabdominal radical surgery and intrathoracic anastomosis with the overlap or OrVil methods at our center from January 2018 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The relevant surgical and postoperative complication data of the two groups were collected and analyzed. Results: Clinical characteristics: the mean tumor size was 7.5 ±2.4 cm in the OrVil group and 4.3 ±1.9 cm in the overlap group (p < 0.05). Surgery: the distance from the upper resection margin of the esophagus to the tumor was 3.2 ±0.84 cm in the OrVil group and 2.4 ±0.6 cm in the overlap group (p < 0.05). Postoperative complications: there were two cases of pleural effusion in the OrVil group and 18 cases of pleural effusion in the overlap group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: There is no significant difference between the OrVil and overlap anastomosis in terms of the feasibility and safety; however, OrVil anastomosis can provide a higher margin of resection of the esophagus and is suitable for tumors with extensive esophageal invasion.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Esophagojejunostomy after minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) for gastric cancer (GC) is technically challenging. Failure of the esophagojejunal anastomosis can lead to significant morbidity, leading to short- and long-term quality of life (QoL) impairment or mortality. The optimal reconstruction method following MITG remains controversial. We evaluated outcomes of minimally invasive esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic or robotic total gastrectomies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed MITG patients between 2015 and 2020 at two high-volume centers in China and the United States. Eligible patients were divided into groups by different reconstruction methods. We compared clinicopathologic characteristics, postoperative outcomes, including complication rates, overall survival rate (OS), disease-free survival rate (DFS), and patient-reported QoL. RESULTS: GC patients (n = 105) were divided into intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (IEJ, n = 60) and extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EEJ, n = 45) groups. EEJ had higher incidence of wound infection (8.3% vs 13.3%, P = 0.044) and pneumonia (21.7% vs 40.0%, P = 0.042) than IEJ. The linear stapler (LS) group was inferior to the circular stapler (CS) group in reflux [50.0 (11.1-77.8) vs 44.4 (0.0-66.7), P = 0.041] and diarrhea [33.3 (0.0-66.7) vs 0.0 (0.0-66.7), P = 0.045] while LS was better than CS for dysphagia [22.2 (0.0-33.3) vs 11.1 (0.0-33.3), P = 0.049] and eating restrictions [33.3 (16.7-58.3) vs 41.7 (16.7-66.7), P = 0.029] at 1 year. OS and DFS did not differ significantly between LS and CS. CONCLUSIONS: IEJ anastomosis generated better results than EEJ. LS was associated with a better patient eating experience, but more diarrhea and reflux compared with CS. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes show the superiority of IEJ with the LS reconstruction method in MITG for GC.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Acute gastric necrosis is a rare event requiring organ resection. Delayed reconstruction is advisable in patients with peritonitis and sepsis. The most common complication of gastrectomy with reconstruction is failure of esophagojejunostomy and duodenal stump. In case of severe esophagojejunostomy failure, appropriate surgical approach and timing of reconstructive stage should be analyzed. We report one-stage reconstructive surgery in a patient with multiple fistulas after previous gastrectomy. Surgery included reconstructive jejunogastroplasty with jejunal graft interposition. The patient underwent previous several unsuccessful reconstructive procedures complicated by failure of esophagojejunostomy and duodenal stump with external intestinal, duodenal and esophageal fistulas. Nutritional insufficiency, water and electrolyte disorders due to significant loss of proteins and intestinal juice through the drain tubes deteriorated clinical status. Surgical procedures finished reconstruction, provided closure of multiple fistulas and stomas and restored physiological duodenal passage.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Performing an intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy during laparoscopic-assisted total or proximal gastrectomy is challenging. We developed an ingenious method of overlapping esophagojejunostomy using a linear stapler to avoid stapler-related intraoperative complications. Methods: Following lymph node dissection, the esophagus was transected anterior-posteriorly. A linear stapler was used to divide the jejunum ∼20 cm distal to the Treitz ligament. A small enterotomy was then created 5 cm distal to the elevated jejunal stump to insert the linear stapler cartridge. An electronic knife was used to make a full-thickness incision, with the tip of the nasogastric tube (NGT) pressed against the posterior wall of the esophageal stump as a guide. Full-thickness sutures were placed on both the anterior and posterior walls of the entry hole in the esophageal stump to prevent the anvil fork from being misinserted into the submucosal layer of the esophagus. The thread on the posterior wall was guided through the port to the outside of the abdominal cavity, where the linear stapler was inserted to perform the side-to-side anastomosis. A 45-mm cartridge fork and an anvil fork were inserted into the elevated jejunum and esophageal stump entry holes, respectively, following which the esophageal stump was gently grasped. The thread on the posterior wall side was pulled from outside the abdominal cavity through the port. This step is necessary to close the gap between the esophageal and jejunal walls. After confirming that the anvil fork was not misinserted into the submucosal layer of the esophagus and that there was no gap between the esophagus and the elevated jejunum, the linear stapler was fired to create the anastomosis. The insertion hole was closed with hand-sewn sutures or linear staples to complete the esophagojejunostomy. Results: Eleven patients underwent this procedure with no anastomotic complications. Conclusions: This method enables us to perform an easier and more stable esophagojejunostomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after total or proximal robot-assisted gastrectomy is technically more demanding than gastroduodenostomy and gastrojejunostomy for distal gastrectomy, as well as laparoscopic surgery. We have established a safe and simple esophagojejunostomy procedure using a liner stapler attached to the Da Vinci Surgical System and a barbed suture device. Patients and methods: For esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy or proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction, we choose the "overlap method," in which entry holes were made at the left of the esophageal stump and at 5 cm of the anal side in antimesentric area of the jejunum, followed by anastomosis on the left of the esophagus using SureForm (blue 45 mm) and hand-sewing closure of the common entry hole with V-Loc. We analyzed the short-term surgical outcomes of all patients. Results: 23 patients underwent this reconstruction technique. None of the patients required any further open surgeries. The mean time to perform anastomosis was 24.7±2.8 min. The postoperative course was uneventful in 22 patients; a single patient developed minor anastomotic leakage (Clavien-Dindo grade 3), which was treated with conservative therapy employing a drainage tube. Conclusion: Our esophagojejunostomy method following robot-assisted gastrectomy is simple and feasible, with acceptable short-term outcomes, and could represent the procedure of choice for esophagojejunostomy.

RESUMEN

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most malignant human cancers. Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) is a difficult operation, especially esophagojejunostomy. Our team has adopted the method of suspending and pulling the esophagus with the visceral retractor and two needles of barbed wire interlocking to suture the common opening, which reduces the difficulty of the operation. From January to December 2020, 20 patients underwent TLTG with the overlap method by improved esophagojejunostomy technique and 20 patients with the traditional overlap method after TLTG were used as the control group. The surgery was performed using a five-trocar system. After lymphadenectomy, the esophagus was separated at least 2 cm from the upper edge of the tumor. Improved esophagojejunostomy technique was completed by the following steps: (1) cutting end of the esophagus suspension; (2) jejuno-jejunostomy; (3) esophagojejunostomy; (4) close the esophagojejunum common incision opening. The results showed that the operative time, and anastomosis time of the modified group were shorter than those of the traditional group, There were no postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, duodenal stump fistula and Roux stasis syndrome in the both group. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. Taken together, our modified esophagojejunostomy technique after total gastrectomy is feasible and safe. This procedure is an efficient method to shorten the operation time and reduce the difficulty of surgery in esophagojejunostomy of laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: In laparoscopic total gastrectomy with overlap esophagojejunostomy (EJS), esophageal 'false track' is easily formed during EJS. In this study, a linear cutter/stapler guiding device (LCSGD) was used in EJS, so that the linear cutting stapler can complete the technical action with high speed and high efficiency in a narrow space, while avoiding the formation of 'false passage', optimizing the quality of common opening and shortening the anastomosis time. The LCSGD is safe and feasible in laparoscopic total gastrectomy overlap EJS, and the clinical effect is satisfactory. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive design was adopted. The clinical data of 10 gastric cancer patients admitted to the Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from July 2021 to November 2021 were collected. The cohort comprised 8 males and 2 females aged 50-75 years. Results: (I) The intra-operative conditions: 10 patients received LCSGD-guided overlap EJS after radical laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Both D2 lymphadenectomy and R0 resection were achieved in these patients. No combined multiple organ resection was performed. There was neither conversion to an open thoracic or abdominal procedure nor conversion to other EJS approaches. The average time from the entry of the LCSGD into the abdominal cavity to the completion of the firing of the stapler was 1.8±0.4 minutes, the average time for manual suturing of the EJS common opening was 14.4±2.1 minutes (mean: 18±2 stitches), and the average operative time was 255±52 minutes. (II) The postoperative outcomes: the time to the first ambulation was 1.9±1.4 days, the average time to the first postoperative exhaust/defecation was 3.5±1.3 days, the average time to a semi-liquid diet was 3.6±0.7 days, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 10.4±4.1 days. All patients were smoothly discharged, without any secondary surgery, bleeding, anastomotic fistula, or duodenal stump fistula. (III) Follow-up: The telephone follow-up lasted 9-12 months. No eating disorders or anastomotic stenosis was reported. One patient experienced Visick grade II heartburn, and the condition of the remaining 9 patients was Visick grade I. Conclusions: Application of the LCSGD in overlap EJS after laparoscopic total gastrectomy is safe and feasible, with satisfactory clinical effectiveness.

RESUMEN

Background: While numerous techniques have been defined for esophagojejunostomy (EJ) during total gastrectomy including hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses, mechanical linear-stapled (LS) and circular-stapled (CS) anastomoses are widely adopted. However, there are scarce data on the optimal stapled technique for EJ during total gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PubMed were investigated up to October 30, 2022. We considered articles that appraised short-term outcomes after LS versus CS anastomosis in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Anastomotic leak (AL), anastomotic stricture (AS), and anastomotic bleeding (AB) were primary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used as pooled effect size measures, whereas 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to calculate related inference. Results: Sixteen studies (3156 patients) were incorporated. Overall, 1540 (48.8%) underwent CS, whereas 1616 (51.2%) underwent LS. Compared with CS, LS was related to a condensed RR for AS (RR: 0.27; 95% CI 0.15-0.49; P < .01), whereas no differences were found for AL (RR: 0.75; 95% CI 0.51-1.10; P = .14) and AB (RR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.24-1.44; P = .25). Postoperative pneumonia (RR: 0.98; P = .94), operative time (SMD: 0.51; P = .31), days to soft diet (SMD: -0.08; P = .36), hospital stay (SMD: 0.19; P = .46), and 30-day mortality (RR: 1.76; P = .31) were comparable between LS and CS. Conclusions: For EJ during total gastrectomy, our results suggest that LS seems related to a reduced risk of AS compared with CS, although no significant differences were found for the risk of AL and AB between the two techniques. Clinical Trial Registration number: CRD42022381221.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An optimal method for digestive tract reconstruction (DTR) in laparoscopic radical resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has not yet been standardized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy (EJ) technique during transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy (TSLE) for Siewert type II AEG with esophageal invasion > 3 cm. METHODS: The perioperative clinical data and short-term outcomes for patients who underwent TSLE using hand-sewn EJ for Siewert type II AEG with esophageal invasion > 3 cm between March 2019 and April 2022 have been retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were eligible. All 25 patients were successfully operated. None was converted to open surgery or mortality. 84.00% of patients were male and 16.00% were female. The mean age, body mass index (BMI), and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were 67.88 ± 8.10 years, 21.30 ± 2.80 kg/m2, and 2.08, respectively. The average incorporated operative and hand-sewn EJ procedural times were 274.92 ± 57.46 and 23.36 ± 3.00 min, respectively. The length of extracorporeal esophageal involvement and proximal margin was 3.31 ± 0.26 cm and 3.12 ± 0.12 cm, respectively. The average time for the first oral feeding and hospital stay were 6 (3-14) and 7 (3-18) days, respectively. Two patients (8.00%) developed postoperative grade IIIa complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, including 1 case of pleural effusion and 1 case of anastomotic leakage, both of whom were cured by puncture drainage. CONCLUSION: Hand-sewn EJ in TSLE is safe and feasible for Siewert type II AEG. This method can ensure safe proximal margins and could be a good option with an advanced endoscopic suture technique for type II tumor with esophageal invasion > 3 cm.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™) is frequently selected for esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) because of its versatility. During anastomosis with OrVil™, the double stapling technique (DST) or hemi-double stapling technique (HDST) can be selected by overlapping the linear stapler and the circular stapler. However, no studies have reported the differences between the methods and their clinical significance. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial with a parallel assignment and single-blind outcomes assessment analysis was conducted. Patients with gastric cancer eligible for LTG who met the selection criteria were randomized. Preoperative characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the DST and HDST. The primary endpoint was an anastomosis-related complication, and the secondary endpoints were perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications, excluding anastomosis-related complications. RESULTS: Thirty patients with gastric cancer were eligible and randomized. LTG and esophagojejunostomy were successfully performed in all patients, without conversion to laparotomy. Preoperative characteristics, excluding preoperative chemotherapy, were not significantly different between the two groups. One anastomotic leakage of Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ IIIa was observed in the DST, although no significant difference was found between the two groups (6.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.30). In the HDST, one case of anastomotic stricture required endoscopic balloon dilation. No significant differences were found in operative time, whereas the anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the HDST than in the DST (47.5 ± 15.8 vs. 38.2 ± 8.8 min, P = 0.028). Except for anastomosis-related complications, postoperative complications (P = 0.282) and postoperative hospital stay for the DST and HDST were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: No superiority was found between the DST and HDST with OrVil™ in esophagojejunostomy of LTG for gastric cancer with respect to postoperative complications, whereas the HDST may be preferable in terms of the simplicity of the surgical technique.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: Esophagojejunostomy leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is one of the most serious and sometimes life-threatening adverse events. The purpose of this study was to evaluate complications after total gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer during the period when Histoacryl (B. Braun) injection was performed. Therapeutic outcome of endoscopic Histoacryl injection for esophagojejunostomy leakage was also determined. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study. Between January 2016 and December 2021, clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of 205 patients who underwent total gastrectomy were investigated. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of 10 patients with esophagojejunostomy leakage were also investigated. Results: Postoperative complication and mortality rates of total gastrectomy in 205 patients were 25.4% and 0.9%, respectively. Serious complications more than Clavien-Dindo IIIb accounted for 6.3%. Ten (4.9%) esophagojejunostomy leakages occurred in 205 patients. Among 10 esophagojejunostomy leakage patients, endoscopic Histoacryl injection was performed on eight patients and leakage was successfully managed with endoscopic Histoacryl injection in seven patients (87.5%). Mean postinjection hospital stay of seven successfully managed patients was 13.8 days. They were able to drink water at 1-6 days after injection. Among eight patients with endoscopic Histoacryl injection, six patients were injected once and two patients were injected three times. Conclusion: Endoscopic Histoacryl injection for esophagojejunostomy leakage after total gastrectomy can be considered as a useful treatment for some selected cases.