RESUMEN

Posteromedial dislocation of the elbow is a rare entity even exceptional if associated with a lateral condylar fracture. Very few isolated cases are reported in the English literature. We report an additional case of a 14-year-old child admitted for elbow trauma during scholar sport and presented a posteromedial elbow dislocation associated with a fracture of the lateral humeral condyle. The surgical treatment was made by using 3 cortical screws. The results were satisfying including range motion and he has resumed sports activities at 5 months. Elbow dislocation is a rare affection in children. It represents 3% to 6% of elbow injuries. The association of posteromedial elbow dislocation with a Milch type I is remarkably rare. We review the mechanism, classifications, and therapeutic modalities of this injury. Elbow dislocations associated with a lateral condylar fracture are exceptional and need an early reduction followed by an anatomical internal fixation to ensure articular congruity.

RESUMEN

Objective This research aimed to assess the functional result of type III and IV radial head fractures that were treated using a radial head prosthesis. Methods A retrospective investigation was conducted on 70 patients with type III and IV radial head and neck fractures, as classified by Mason. The patients were hospitalized and received treatment at the Orthopaedics Department, where they had radial head prosthesis surgery for three years. Results Among the total of 70 cases, 42 (60%) cases were below the age of 40, while 28 (47%) cases were over 40 years. The average age was 36.4 years. The maximum age recorded was 54 years, while the lowest age recorded was 30 years. The female population outnumbered the male population. The majority of instances (42, 60%) were attributed to falls, while the remaining cases were caused by road traffic accidents (RTAs). Out of the total 70 instances, 52 cases (74.28%) exhibited right-side dominance, whereas 18 cases (25.72%) exhibited left-side dominance. Within our case study group, 56 (80%) cases fell under modified Mason's classification type Ill, totaling 56 instances. The remaining 20% of the cases, amounting to 11 cases, were classified as modified Mason's classification type IV. Among the 70 patients, 55 cases (78.58%) did not have any ligamentous damage, whereas seven (10%) cases had lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) injury and eight (11%) cases had medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury. The P value for flexion, extension, pronation, and supination was shown to be very significant. Out of the total, 47 (67%) instances had an MEPI score (Mayo Elbow Performance Index) of more than 90, indicating exceptional performance. In addition, 16 cases (22.85%) had an MEPI score ranging from 75 to 89, which is considered a good result. Lastly, seven cases (10%) had an MEPI score ranging from 60 to 74, indicating a fair result. Conclusion The use of a radial head prosthesis is considered a viable option for managing severe and irreparable fractures of the radial head. Effective outcomes hinge on meticulous preoperative planning, skilled intraoperative techniques, and intensive postoperative rehabilitation. These elements collectively contribute to achieving consistent and favorable results in patients undergoing this surgical intervention.

RESUMEN

Key Clinical Message: In LMICs, the nonoperative management of posterior elbow dislocation associated with radial head fracture is still a therapeutic option with favorable outcomes. Abstract: Elbow dislocation associated with radial head fracture is a rare lesion. The occurrence of such a lesion requires high energy trauma. The restoration of joint and radial head fracture that allows early mobilization is the best guarantee of a good functional outcome. We report a case of posterior elbow dislocation associated with radial head fracture managed by closed reduction and 1 week cast immobilization in neutral prono-supination and 90°flexion followed by early mobilization was performed favorable functional outcome was obtained after 12 weeks. We review the different pattern of elbow dislocation and question the need of open reduction and internal fixation for displaced radial head fractures.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Traumatic elbow instability (subluxation and dislocation) represents a challenging clinical entity that can be complicated by persistent intraoperative instability after attempted stabilization or recurrent postoperative instability. Both static and dynamic supplemental stabilization procedures have been described for cases where fracture fixation and ligament repair fail to restore stability. There is a paucity of prior studies involving ulnohumeral cross-pinning (UCP), which is a type of static supplemental stabilization. Our purpose was to assess complications and outcomes after UCP. METHODS: We reviewed all surgical cases involving primary and revision UCP for traumatic elbow instability at a single center from 2017-2023. Baseline demographics were recorded. Outcomes including radiographs, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures, and surgical complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients undergoing UCP were included with a mean follow-up of 27 months. Five cross-pinnings (36%) were performed during revision procedures. Mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were 2.4, 34, and 69, respectively. The mean flexion-extension and pronation-supination arcs were 114° and 140°, with 85% achieving at least a 100° arc for flexion and forearm rotation. Five patients (36%) had complications, all of which required reoperation. Two complications involved postoperative instability: one radial head subluxation and one radial head dislocation. Both occurred in revision UCP cases indicated for recurrent postoperative instability. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnohumeral cross-pinning for persistent and recurrent elbow instability results in maintained ulnohumeral joint alignment, functional arcs of elbow range of motion, and acceptable patient-reported outcome measures, particularly in the setting of a primary procedure indicated for persistent intraoperative instability. Ulnohumeral cross-pinning is a reasonable supplemental stabilization procedure for complex elbow instability. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Proximal radio-ulnar translocation (PRUT) with elbow dislocation, without a fracture, is an extremely unusual injury. Case: A 6-year-old female child presented to us with posterior elbow dislocation, PRUT and incomplete ulnar nerve palsy. A hematoma aspiration and reduction of the elbow joint were done with a hyper-supination manoeuvre to reverse the translocation. She was managed with an above-elbow cast for 4 weeks and showed good radiological and functional outcomes on subsequent follow-ups until 1 year. Conclusion: Early recognition of PRUT and a thorough clinico-radiological assessment are mandatory when dealing with paediatric elbow injuries. Our cadaveric study with illustrations defines the mechanism of this rare injury for better understanding.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic elbow dislocations are among the most common injuries in sport climbing. They occur most frequently in bouldering (a climbing discipline with strong upward trend often performed indoors) due to the typical low-height backward fall into crashpads. There is still no data about the functional outcome and return to sport of this typical bouldering injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All Patients with elbow dislocations due to a bouldering associated fall between 2011 and 2020 were identified retrospectively in our level I trauma centre. Trauma mechanisms, injury types and therapies were obtained. Follow-up was performed with an online questionnaire including sports-related effects, return to sport and the Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS). RESULTS: 30 patients with elbow dislocations after bouldering accidents were identified. In 22 (73.3%) patients the injury was a simple dislocation. The questionnaire was completed by 20 patients. The leading mechanism was a low-height fall into crashpads. Surgical procedures were performed in every second patient. 18 patients (90%) reported return to bouldering after 4.7 ± 2.1 months. 12 patients (66.7%) regained their pre-injury level. Mid-/Long-term follow-up (mean 105 ± 37.5 months) showed excellent results in ESAS score (97.2 ± 3.9 points). Persistent limited range of motion or instability was reported by only 3 patients (15%). CONCLUSION: Most athletes are able to return to bouldering but only two thirds regain their pre-injury performance level in this demanding upper-extremity sport. The unique low-height trauma mechanism may create a false sense of security. Specific awareness and safety features should be placed for climbing athletes to reduce elbow injuries.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Elbow dislocations, particularly those associated with varus posteromedial rotary instability, are relatively uncommon. We present the case of a 25-year-old male initially managed nonoperatively for a posterior elbow dislocation, who subsequently experienced irreducible re-dislocation with characteristic fractures of the anteromedial facet and tip of the coronoid, indicative of varus posteromedial rotary instability. Case Report: Following an unsuccessful attempt at closed reduction under general anesthesia, open reduction was performed, revealing the interposition of the posterior capsule of the humero-ulnar joint as the cause of irreducibility. Fixation of the coronoid fracture was undertaken, and the patient exhibited excellent functional outcomes at a 4.5-year follow-up. Conclusion: This case underscores the rarity of irreducible elbow dislocation in the context of varus posteromedial rotary instability and highlights the crucial role of capsular interposition in such cases. Successful open reduction, coronoid fixation, and attentive postoperative care contributed to the patient's favorable long-term functional outcome.

RESUMEN

Although rare, acute compartment syndrome may develop as a simple elbow dislocation after reduction without initial motor, sensory, or peripheral circulatory abnormalities. This report describes a rare case of this condition. Acute compartment syndrome remains a potential complication, even in a simple elbow dislocation without apparent initial abnormalities, and should be explained to patients. A peripheral nerve block during reduction may mask symptoms and delay recognition of acute compartment syndrome. This case highlights the importance of vigilant monitoring for acute compartment syndrome following reduction of simple elbow dislocations, especially when a peripheral nerve block is used during reduction.

RESUMEN

The comprehensive locker-based classification system brought revolutionary insight into the treatment of often misdiagnosed forearm joint injuries. The authors of the classification scheme subsequently described a combination of simple elbow dislocations and forearm joint injuries (two- and three-locker injuries), but to date, no review of the literature on combined radiocarpal dislocation and forearm joint injuries has been undertaken. The combination of radiocarpal dislocation and forearm joint injury is a rare traumatic pattern, usually related to high-energy trauma. The aim of this study was to confirm the possible occurrence of a forearm joint injury and radiocarpal dislocation. We performed a systematic review of the existing literature, including case reports, to find combinations of radiocarpal dislocation and forearm joint injury. Only one case report was found. Based on the results of our search and the literature review, we recommend modifying the comprehensive locker-based classification system by adding injury patterns of combined forearm joint and neighboring joint injuries.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In acute treatment of radial head fractures, a radial head prosthesis can be considered if open reduction and internal fixation are not technically feasible. METHODS: We reviewed the data of 27 consecutive bipolar Judet radial head prostheses implanted in patients with unreconstructable radial head fractures and no other concomitant fractures (coronoid or olecranon factures). The lesions of the lateral collateral ligament were rated according to the McKee classification. Twenty-three patients with more than ten-year follow-up participated in this retrospective study All patients underwent assessments for pain, range of motion and stability using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the QuickDash questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale for pain. Radiography assessment was performed to determine the correct setting of the implant, presence of periprosthetic loosening, prosthetic disassembly, heterotopic ossification, capitellum and ulnohumeral degenerative changes. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 149 months (± 12.2). Mean range of motion in flexion-extension was 111° (± 10.55), mean extension was 18° (± 14.32) and mean flexion was 130° (± 11.4). Mean arc of motion in supination-pronation was 150° (± 12.26). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 88, the mean QuickDash score was 7.3; 86% of the patients were satisfied. Seven patients (26%) required secondary surgery. The most frequent complication was heterotopic ossification, which had negative consequences on the functional result. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar radial head prostheses are an option for acute treatment of isolated unreconstructable radial head fractures. During follow-up, three patients required implant revision and removal; the capitellum surface presented severe degenerative changes and the prosthesis was not replaced. Another complication was the risk of implant dislocation, in relation to implant design, incorrect positioning of the radial head stem or else to inadequate reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament. Further work is needed to establish the long-term follow-up results of Judet implants in complex elbow fractures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow arises from damage to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). While various methods exist for reconstructing or repairing the LUCL's attachment to the humerus, the most effective approach remains debatable. This study aims to assess the outcomes of directly repairing the LUCL when the injury occurs at the humeral attachment. Methodology This retrospective study, conducted at the Royal Berkshire Foundation Trust NHS hospital in Reading, UK, assessed outcomes through a review of 15 patients who underwent direct repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament between 2017 and 2022, evaluating a range of motion, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the Nestor grading system. Results This study included nine males and six females, with an average age of 38.8 years. Most LUCL injuries arose from elbow dislocation (46.7%). The average follow-up period for patients was 26 months. At the final assessment, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score reached 99. According to the Nestor grading system, 12 patients achieved excellent results, and three had good outcomes. On average, there was an 11.3° loss of final extension and 5° of final flexion, yet achieving a comparable pronation-supination arch to the contralateral side. Conclusion Direct repair of the LUCL for elbow posterolateral rotary instability yielded excellent outcomes, obviating ligament reconstruction. Recognized as minimally invasive, it accelerates recovery, minimizes trauma, and offers a cost-effective procedure for managing instability.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: The goal of surgical management for unstable elbow injuries is the restoration of joint concentricity and stability. After internal fixation, concerns may exist regarding instability or durability of the fixation construct. Historically, these scenarios were treated with options such as transarticular pinning or external fixation. Recently, an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) that allows postoperative mobilization was introduced. Our objective was to systematically review the literature to aggregate the clinical and biomechanical evidence for the IJS of the elbow. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was performed, following the PRISMA guidelines. The search results were narrowed from 2015 through 2023 to coincide with the inception of the device being reviewed. Results: A total of nine retrospective reports on the IJS (N = 171) cases at a mean follow-up of 10.8 months were included. The pooled rate of implant failure was 4.4%, and recurrent instability was 4.1%. Additionally, the we included seven case reports and two biomechanical reports. Conclusions: The aggregate literature describes satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability and device failure for the IJS of the elbow. The limited biomechanical investigations conclude efficacy for stability profiles. Clinical relevance: Across a spectrum of unstable elbow cases, the IJS prevented recurrent instability during the early postoperative period. Notably, the device requires an additional procedure for removal, and the long-term impact of the retained devices is currently unclear.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries in patients treated with and without a hinged elbow orthosis (HEO) in the post-operative setting. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent surgical treatment of terrible triad injuries including radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, and ulnohumeral dislocation between 2008 and 2023 with at least 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated post-operatively without HEO, and 22 patients were treated with HEO. There were no differences in range of motion (ROM) between patients treated with and without HEO in final flexion-extension arc (118.4° no HEO, 114.6° HEO, p = 0.59) or pronation-supination arc (147.8° no HEO, 141.4° HEO, p = 0.27). Five patients treated without HEO and one patient treated with HEO returned to the operating room for stiffness (26%, 5%, p = 0.08). QuickDASH scores were similar between groups (p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no difference in post-operative ROM, complications, or QuickDASH scores in patients treated post-operatively with or without HEO. Based on these results, we cannot determine whether the use of HEO adds additional stability to the elbow while initiating ROM exercises post-operatively.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current treatment concepts for simple elbow dislocation involve conservative and surgical approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the superiority of one treatment strategy over the other by a qualitative analysis in adult patients who suffered simple elbow luxation. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and following the suggestions for reporting on qualitative summaries was performed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, including variations and combinations of the following keywords: elbow, radiohumeral, ulnohumeral, radioulnar, luxation, and therapy. Seventeen studies that performed a randomized controlled trial to compare treatment strategies as conservative or surgical procedures were included. Reviews are not selected for further qualitative analysis. The following outcome parameters were compared: range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (Quick-DASH), recurrent instability, pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and time to return to work (RW). RESULTS: Early mobilization after conservative treatment strategies showed improved ROM compared to immobilization for up to 3 weeks after surgery with less extension deficit in the early mobilization group (16° ± 13°. vs. 19.5° ± 3°, p < 0.05), as well as excellent clinical outcome scores. Surgical approaches showed similar results compared to conservative treatment, leading to improved ROM (115 vs. 118 ± 2.8) and MEPS: 95 ± 7 vs. 92 ± 4. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment with early functional training of the elbow remains the first-line therapy for simple elbow dislocation. The surgical procedure provides similar outcomes compared to conservative treatment regarding MEPS and ROM for patients with slight initial instability in physical examination and radiographs. People with red flags for persistent instability, such as severe bilateral ligament injuries and moderate to severe instability during initial physical examination, should be considered for a primary surgical approach to prevent recurrent posterolateral and valgus instability. Postoperative early mobilization and early mobilization for conservatively treated patients is beneficial to improve patient outcome and ROM.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Persistent and recurrent postoperative elbow instability includes a spectrum of pathologies ranging from joint incongruity and subluxation to dislocation. Restoration of osseous anatomy, particularly the coronoid, is a priority in restoring elbow alignment and maintaining ulnohumeral joint stability. After managing bony deficiencies, soft-tissue and ligamentous structures are typically addressed. When required, both static and dynamic adjunctive stabilization procedures have been described, which aid in maintaining a concentric reduction. In these complex procedures, both complication avoidance and early recognition of postoperative complications assist in obtaining a good result. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for revision stabilization for patients with persistent and recurrent elbow subluxation or dislocation after primary stabilization.

Asunto(s)