RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Performance status (PS), an essential indicator of patients' functional abilities, is often documented in clinical notes of patients with cancer. The use of natural language processing (NLP) in extracting PS from electronic medical records (EMRs) has shown promise in enhancing clinical decision-making, patient monitoring, and research studies. We designed and validated a multi-institute NLP pipeline to automatically extract performance status from free-text patient notes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data from 19,481 patients in Harris Health System (HHS) and 333,862 patients from veteran affair's corporate data warehouse (VA-CDW) and randomly selected 400 patients from each data source to train and validate (50%) and test (50%) the proposed pipeline. We designed an NLP pipeline using an expert-derived rule-based approach in conjunction with extensive post-processing to solidify its proficiency. To demonstrate the pipeline's application, we tested the compliance of PS documentation suggested by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Metric and investigated the potential disparity in PS reporting for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We used a logistic regression test, considering patients in terms of race/ethnicity, conversing language, marital status, and gender. RESULTS: The test results on the HHS cohort showed 92% accuracy, and on VA data demonstrated 98.5% accuracy. For stage IV NSCLC patients, the proposed pipeline achieved an accuracy of 98.5%. Furthermore, our analysis revealed a documentation rate of over 85% for PS among NSCLC patients, surpassing the ASCO Quality Metrics. No disparities were observed in the documentation of PS. CONCLUSION: Our proposed NLP pipeline shows promising results in extracting PS from free-text notes from various health institutions. It may be used in longitudinal cancer data registries.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Humanos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMEN
AIM: An accurate assessment of the general condition of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is essential. We evaluated the impact of grip strength (GS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) on the clinical outcomes of patients with unresectable HCC (u-HCC) treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. METHODS: This observational cohort study analyzed 89 patients with u-HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab between October, 2020 and October, 2023. A Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to identify the prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes. RESULTS: There were 33 patients who had low GS and 16 had an ECOG-PS ≥1. The frequency of patients with low GS increased as the ECOG-PS score increased. The overall survival of the normal GS group was significantly higher than that of the low GS group (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the normal GS group and low-GS group (p = 0.28). Among the patients in the ECOG-PS 0 groups, the overall survival in the normal GS group was significantly higher than that in the low GS group (p < 0.01). A multivariate analysis revealed that modified albumin-bilirubin 2b (HR 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.73), α-fetoprotein ≥100 ng/mL (HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.20-4.58), and low GS (HR 2.87; 95% CI 1.31-6.27) were independently associated with a poor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that GS is a sensitive marker for detecting a subclinical decline in the general condition and is therefore a potential predictor of the outcome of u-HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 probably cannot tolerate chemotherapy or other antitumor therapies. Some studies have reported that immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity. However, the efficacy of this combination as a later-line therapy in patients with ECOG PS 2 is unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this combination strategy as third- or further-line therapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ECOG PS 2. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients treated with camrelizumab plus antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab, anlotinib, or recombinant human endostatin) were included. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) assessed by ECOG PS, and safety were analyzed. RESULTS: Between January 10, 2019, and February 28, 2024, a total of 59 patients were included. The ORR was 35.6% (21/59) and the DCR was 86.4%. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months (range: 0.7-23.7), the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-7.3) and the median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-13.6). QOL was improved (≥1 reduction in ECOG PS) in 39 patients (66.1%). The most common Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic dysfunction (6 [10%]), hypertension (5 [8%]), and hypothyroidism (3 [5%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Third- or further-line immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity in stage IV NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to confirm the clinical benefits of this combination therapy.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Endostatinas , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Endostatinas/uso terapéutico , Endostatinas/administración & dosificación , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: There is a lack of readily available clinical markers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) immunotherapy efficacy. Previous studies have found that overexpressed complement component 1q (C1q) promotes macrophage M2 polarization and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. This study aimed to evaluate the association between serum C1q and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: A total of 168 patients with advanced NSCLC who received ICIs in the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were included in this study. Serum C1q levels were collected before and 3 weeks after immunotherapy treatment, together with other data on clinical and demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) (months from first dose of ICIs to death, censored at date of last follow-up). Secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) [defined as months from first dose of ICIs to clinical or radiographic progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) or death, censored at date of last follow-up] and objective response rate (ORR) which was defined as rate of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at best response by RECIST 1.1. Results: A total of 168 patients were included in this study, including 127 males (75.60%) and 41 females (24.40%). Thirty-nine patients achieved objective response (2 CR, 37 PR), and 111 patients (66.07%) had stable disease (SD) as best response. The ORR was 23.21% and the disease control rate was 89.28%. The upward trends of serum C1q levels between baseline and post-treatment were strongly associated with the shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.554, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-2.10, P=0.01] and OS (HR =1.444, 95% CI: 1.01-1.98, P=0.03). Moreover, taking the median OS 18.9 months as the cut-off of prognosis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that serum baseline C1q yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.785 (95% CI: 0.711-0.869). The optimal serum baseline C1q cut-off point to predict immunotherapy prognosis was 216.2 mg/L. Conclusions: These findings suggested that elevated serum C1q after ICIs treatment was related to a worse prognosis in NSCLC. Monitoring the baseline and dynamic data of C1q during hospitalization showed the potential to predict the prognosis of NSCLC patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effect of age, sex, and eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS) on the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remains elusive. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate whether such effects exist. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligible studies in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were retrieved. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-eleven studies involving 14,768 HCC patients were included. The findings indicated that the ECOG PS didn't have a significant effect on the ORR and PFS in ICI-treated HCC patients (higher ECOG PS vs. lower ECOG PS: ORR: OR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.55-1.10; PFS: HR = 1.15, 95%CI = 0.97-1.35), while those patients with a higher ECOG PS may have a worse OS (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.26-1.84). There is no significant evidence of the effect of age (older vs. younger) or sex (males vs. females) on the efficacy of ICI therapy in HCC. CONCLUSION: ICI therapy in HCC should not be restricted strictly to certain patients in age or sex categories, while HCC patients with higher ECOG PS may require closer medication or follow-up strategy during ICI therapy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42024518407.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Factores de Edad , Factores Sexuales , Masculino , Femenino , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Advanced cancer patients with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (score 0-1) are underrepresented in current qualitative reports compared with their dying counterparts. AIM: To explore the experiences and care needs of advanced cancer patients with good ECOG. DESIGN: A qualitative phenomenological approach using semi-structured interview was employed. Data was analyzed using the Colaizzi's method. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of terminal solid cancer patients on palliative care aged 18-70 years with a 0-1 ECOG score were recruited from a tertiary general hospital. RESULTS: Sixteen participants were interviewed. Seven themes were generated from the transcripts, including experiencing no or mild symptoms; independence in self-care, decision-making, and financial capacity; prioritization of cancer growth suppression over symptom management; financial concerns; hope for prognosis and life; reluctance to discuss death and after-death arrangements; and use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and religious coping. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced cancer patients with good ECOG have distinct experiences and care needs from their dying counterparts. They tend to experience no or mild symptoms, demonstrate a strong sense of independence, and prioritize cancer suppression over symptom management. Financial concerns were common and impact their care-related decision-making. Though being hopeful for their prognosis and life, many are reluctant to discuss death and after-death arrangements. Many Chinese patients use herbal medicine as a CAM modality but need improved awareness of and accessibility to treatment options. Healthcare professionals and policy-makers should recognize their unique experiences and needs when tailoring care strategies and policies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Pronóstico , Autocuidado , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Background The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a simple method for identifying patients with bacteremia; however, it is not accurate for predicting it. Performance status assessment involves the evaluation of daily activities and could be beneficial in predicting bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate whether adding Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) to qSOFA could improve the prediction of bacteremia diagnosis in older patients admitted with suspected infections. Methods Data were gathered from individuals aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized with suspected bacteremia from 2018 to 2019. Two prediction models were contrasted employing logistic regression. The initial model exclusively incorporated the qSOFA score, while the second model integrated the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) alongside the qSOFA score. Results Among 1,114 enrolled patients, 221 (19.8%) had true bacteremia. The area under the curve of the qSOFA+ECOG-PS model did not show a statistically significant improvement in predictive capacity compared with that of the qSOFA model (0.544 vs. 0.554, p=0.162). Conclusions Adding the ECOG-PS score did not improve the performance of qSOFA for predicting bacteremia in older patients with suspected infection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The (ECOG) performance status (PS) is commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of patients undergoing antitumor therapy. An ECOG PS of 2, indicating patients capable of self-care but restricted strenuous activity, can complicate treatment decisions owing to concerns regarding treatment-related toxicity. We investigated whether frailty assessment could help discriminate treatment tolerance and survival outcomes in patients with an ECOG PS of 2. METHODS: We prospectively included 45 consecutive patients, aged ≥65 years, with an ECOG PS of 2, and newly diagnosed solid cancer scheduled for chemotherapy. Frailty was assessed using an eight-indicator geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) based on frailty status; secondary outcomes included treatment tolerance and toxicity. RESULTS: The median patient age was 73 years (range 65-94), and 71% had stage IV disease. Predominant frailty-related deficits were functional decline (96%), malnutrition (78%), and polypharmacy (51%). The median OS was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-18.4). Patients with 4-6 deficits had significantly lower OS than those with 1-3 deficits (9.9 months vs. 20.0 months, adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% CI: 1.16-5.44, P = .020). Frailty significantly correlated with reduced 12-week chemotherapy competence (52% vs. 85%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] .14, 95% CI: .03-.70, P = .016) and enhanced risk of unexpected hospitalization (60% vs. 20%, adjusted OR 6.80, 95% CI: 1.64-28.1, P = .008). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the multifaceted nature of patients with an ECOG PS of 2 and emphasize the importance of frailty assessment for treatment outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Evaluación Geriátrica , Neoplasias , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Polifarmacia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Anciano FrágilRESUMEN
Background: Functional deterioration following emergency general surgery (EGS) poses a significant challenge in super-elderly patients. However, limited research has focused on assessing the deterioration in postoperative performance status (PS). This study aimed to investigate the impact of EGS on PS deterioration in super-elderly patients, and the extent to which deteriorated PS is recovered. Methods: This historical cohort study comprised 77 super-elderly patients who underwent EGS between July 2015 and December 2020. Functional deterioration was evaluated by comparing preoperative and postoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS). The Emergency Surgical Score (ESS) was used as a risk-adjustment tool. Questionnaires were mailed to the patients and their families to assess post-discharge PS and obtain their impressions of EGS. Results: Postoperative PS deteriorated in 35/77 patients (45.5 %). Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of sex, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, ESS scores, preoperative ECOG-PS, duration of operation, and major complications. Multivariate analysis of preoperative factors showed that ESS ≥7 (OR: 3.7, 95 % CI: 1.0-13), preoperative ECOG-PS ≤2 (OR: 5.9, 95 % CI: 1.7-21), and female sex (OR: 5.8, 95 % CI: 1.6-21) were associated with postoperative ECOG-PS deterioration. According to the questionnaire results, PS recovery post-discharge was observed in 6/36 (17 %) patients, and 34/36 (94 %) patients and their families expressed positive impressions of EGS. Conclusions: EGS in super-elderly patients highly caused a deterioration in their PS, particularly in patients with maintained preoperative PS. PS hardly recovered; however, most patients and their families had positive impressions of the EGS. Key message: We assessed the pre- and postoperative performance status of super-elderly patients who underwent emergency general surgery. Surgery caused a marked deterioration in patients' functional performance, which seldom recovered postoperatively.
RESUMEN
Background: Investigations of the impact of sepsis on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of fully ambulatory patients are scarce. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected nationwide data on septic patients recruited from 19 hospitals of the Korean Sepsis Alliance between August 2019 and December 2020. Adult septic patients with good ECOG PS (i.e., 0 or 1) before sepsis were enrolled in this study. The change in ECOG PS and the prevalence of disability (ECOG PS ≥2) at hospital discharge were recorded. Results: Of the 4,145 septic patients, 1,735 (41.9%) patients who had ECOG PS of 0 or 1 before sepsis and eventually survived to discharge were selected. After treatment for sepsis, the ECOG PS deteriorated in 514 (29.6%) patients; 376 (21.7%) patients had poor ECOG PS (i.e., ≥2) at hospital discharge. The proportion of patients with poor ECOG PS at hospital discharge increased with increases in the initial sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and lactate level. Furthermore, poor ECOG PS at hospital discharge was found in young patients (aged <65 years, 17.4%), those with no history of cancer (18.2%) or with low comorbidities [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≤2; 13.6%], and those without septic shock (19.9%). In multivariable analysis, age, solid cancer, immunocompromised condition, SOFA score, mechanical ventilation, and use of inappropriate empirical antibiotics (odds ratio: 1.786; 95% confidence interval: 1.151-2.771) were significant risk factors for poor ECOG PS. Conclusions: One in five septic patients who were fully ambulatory before sepsis were not functionally independent at hospital discharge. Incomplete functional recovery was also seen in a substantial proportion of younger patients, those with low comorbidities, and those without septic shock. However, the adequacy of empirical antibiotics may improve the functional status in such patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with platinum-etoposide is the standard first-line therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The phase 3 clinical trials that led to the approval of chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC excluded patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2-3. Therefore, data on the efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with an ECOG PS of 2-3 are limited. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy (atezolizumab or durvalumab) within the Mayo Clinic Health System between January 2016 and January 2021. The objective of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and best clinical response to therapy in patients with an ECOG PS of 0-1 vs. patients with an ECOG PS of 2-3 who received chemoimmunotherapy for newly diagnosed ES-SCLC. RESULTS: In total, 82 patients were included in the study. The mean ± standard deviation age was 68.1 ± 8.3 years. Of these, 56 patients were identified with an ECOG PS of 0-1, and 26 patients were identified with an ECOG PS of 2-3. The median PFS was similar regardless of ECOG PS (5.8 months [95% CI, 4.3-6.0 months] in the ECOG PS 0-1 group vs. 4.1 months [95% CI, 3.8-6.9 months] in the ECOG PS 2-3; p = .2994). The median OS was also similar regardless of ECOG PS (10.6 months [95% CI, 8.4-13.4 months] in the ECOG PS 0-1 group vs. 9.3 months [95% CI, 4.9-12.8 months]; p = .2718) in the ECOG PS 2-3 group. CONCLUSIONS: The study results demonstrated no significant difference in PFS or OS among the ECOG PS 2-3 and ECOG PS 0-1 groups. Therefore, chemoimmunotherapy should be considered for patients who have ES-SCLC with an ECOG PS of 2-3.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a threat to vulnerable populations such as long-term care facility (LTCF) residents, who are often older, severely frail, and have multiple comorbidities. Although associations have been investigated between COVID-19 mRNA vaccine immunogenicity, durability, and response to booster vaccination and chronological age, data on the association of clinical factors such as performance status, nutritional status, and underlying comorbidities other than chronological age are limited. Here, we evaluated the anti-spike IgG level and neutralizing activity against the wild-type virus and Delta and Omicron variants in the sera of LTCF residents, outpatients, and healthcare workers before the primary vaccination; at 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the primary vaccination; and approximately 3 months after the booster vaccination. This 48-week prospective longitudinal study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: UMIN000043558). RESULTS: Of 114 infection-naïve participants (64 LTCF residents, 29 outpatients, and 21 healthcare workers), LTCF residents had substantially lower anti-spike IgG levels and neutralizing activity against the wild-type virus and Delta variant than outpatients and healthcare workers over 24 weeks after the primary vaccination. In LTCF residents, booster vaccination elicited neutralizing activity against the wild-type virus and Delta variant comparable to that in outpatients, whereas neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant was comparable to that in outpatients and healthcare workers. Multiple regression analyses showed that age was negatively correlated with anti-spike IgG levels and neutralizing activity against the wild-type virus and Delta variant after the primary vaccination. However, multivariate regression analysis revealed that poor performance status and hypoalbuminemia were more strongly associated with a lower humoral immune response than age, number of comorbidities, or sex after primary vaccination. Booster vaccination counteracted the negative effects of poor performance status and hypoalbuminemia on the humoral immune response. CONCLUSIONS: LTCF residents exhibited suboptimal immune responses following primary vaccination. Although older age is significantly associated with a lower humoral immune response, poor performance status and hypoalbuminemia are more strongly associated with a lower humoral immune response after primary vaccination. Thus, booster vaccination is beneficial for older adults, especially those with a poor performance status and hypoalbuminemia.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapies in patients with worse performance status (PS) treated for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), and non-metastatic/metastatic castration-resistant PCa (nmCRPC/mCRPC), as there is sparse pooled data showing the effect of PS on oncological outcomes in patients with PCa. METHODS: Three databases were queried in June 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing patients with PCa treated with systemic therapy (i.e., adding androgen receptor signalling inhibitor [ARSI] or docetaxel [DOC] to androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT]). We analysed the oncological outcomes of patients with PCa with worse PS, defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥ 1, treated with combination therapies and compared these to patients with good PS. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Overall, 25 and 18 RCTs were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In all clinical settings, combination systemic therapies significantly improved OS in patients with worse PS as well as in those with good PS, while the MFS benefit from ARSI in the nmCRPC setting was more pronounced in patients with good PS than in those with worse PS (P = 0.002). Analysis of treatment ranking in patients with mHSPC revealed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS irrespective of PS; specifically, adding darolutamide to DOC + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with worse PS. Analyses were limited by the small proportion of patients with a PS ≥ 1 (19%-28%) and that the number of PS 2 was rarely reported. CONCLUSIONS: Among RCTs, novel systemic therapies seem to benefit the OS of patients with PCa irrespective of PS. Our findings suggest that worse PS should not discourage treatment intensification across all disease stages.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrated that chemoimmunotherapy prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 or 1. However, there is little data regarding chemoimmunotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC and an ECOG PS 2 or 3. This study aims to evaluate the benefits of chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with ES-SCLC and ECOG PS 2 or 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 46 adults treated at Mayo Clinic between 2017 and 2020 with de novo ES-SCLC and an ECOG PS 2 or 3. Twenty patients received platinum-etoposide and 26 patients received platinum-etoposide and atezolizumab. Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: PFS was longer in the chemoimmunotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy group, 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-6.9) vs. 3.2 months (95% CI: 0.6-4.8), respectively; P = 0.0491. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the OS between the chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy group, 9.3 months (95% CI: : 4.9-12.8) vs. 7.6 months (95% CI: 0.6-11.9), respectively; P = .21. CONCLUSION: Chemoimmunotherapy prolongs PFS compared to chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC and an ECOG PS 2 or 3. No OS difference was observed among the chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy groups; nevertheless, this may be attributed due to the small sample size of the study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Adulto , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Etopósido , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Serum albumin has been demonstrated as prognostic parameter in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal NHL with highly aggressive behavior. In this study, we aimed at creating a novel prognostic model for PCNSL based on serum albumin levels. METHODS: We compared several commonly used laboratory nutritional parameters for predicting the survival of PCNSL patients using overall survival (OS) for outcome analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the optimal cut-off values. Parameters associated with OS were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Independent prognostic parameters for OS were selected for risk stratification, including albumin ≤ 4.1 g/dL, ECOG PS > 1, and LLR > 166.8, which were associated with shorter OS; albumin > 4.1 g/dL, ECOG PS 0-1 and LLR ≤ 166.8, which were associated with longer OS, and five-fold cross-validation was used for evaluating predictive accuracy of identified prognostic model. RESULTS: By univariate analysis, age, ECOG PS, MSKCC score, Lactate dehydrogenase-to-lymphocyte ratio (LLR), total protein, albumin, hemoglobin, and albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) resulted statistically associated with the OS of PCNSL. By multivariate analysis, albumin ≤ 4.1 g/dL, ECOG PS > 1, and LLR > 166.8 were confirmed to be significant predictors of inferior OS. We explored several PCNSL prognostic models based on albumin, ECOG PS and LLR with 1 point assigned to each parameter. Eventually, a novel and effective PCNSL prognostic model based on albumin and ECOG PS successfully classified patients into three risk groups with 5-year survival rates of 47.5%, 36.9%, and 11.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The novel two-factor prognostic model based on albumin and ECOG PS we propose represents a simple but significant prognostic tool for assessing newly diagnosed patients with PCNSL.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma no Hodgkin , Albúmina Sérica , Humanos , Pronóstico , Albúmina Sérica/metabolismo , Linfoma no Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Linfocitos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In the absence of spinal cord compression, it is unclear if surgery is more effective than radiation treatment for improving functional outcomes in metastatic spinal tumor patients with potentially unstable spines. The authors compared functional status outcomes assessed with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores after surgery or radiation in patients without spinal cord compression with Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) values of 7-12 indicating possible instability (SINS 7-12). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with metastatic spinal tumor SINS values of 7-12 at a single institution between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into two different groups: 1) those treated with surgery and 2) those treated with radiation. Baseline clinical characteristics were measured, and KPS and ECOG scores were obtained pre- and postradiation or postsurgery. The paired, nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test and ordinal logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients met inclusion criteria; 63 patients were treated operatively and 99 patients were treated with radiation. The mean follow-up was 1.9 years, with a median of 1.1 years for the surgical cohort (ranging from 2.5 months to 13.8 years) and a mean of 2 years with a median of 0.8 years for the radiation cohort (ranging from 2 months to 9.3 years). After covariates were accounted for, the average posttreatment changes in KPS scores in the surgical cohort were 7.46 ± 17.3 and in the radiation cohort were -2 ± 13.6 (p = 0.045). No significant difference was observed in ECOG scores. KPS scores improved postoperatively in 60.3% of patients in the surgical group and postradiation in 32.3% of patients in the radiation cohort (p < 0.001). Subanalysis within the radiation cohort revealed no differences in fracture rates or local control between patients treated with external-beam radiation therapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy. In patients initially treated with radiation, 21.2% eventually developed compression fractures at a treated level. Five of the 99 patients in the radiation cohort-all of whom had a fracture-eventually underwent either methyl methacrylate augmentation or instrumented fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SINS values of 7-12 who underwent surgery had greater improvement in KPS scores-but not in ECOG scores-than patients undergoing radiation alone. In patients treated with radiation, treatment was converted to a procedural intervention such as surgery only in patients who sustained fractures. Of the patients with fractures after radiation (21 of 99), 5 patients underwent an invasive procedure and 16 did not.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Fracturas por Compresión , Compresión de la Médula Espinal , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/radioterapia , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lung or head and neck cancers are known for their high prevalence and mortality rates. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are usually recommended as cancer treatment for these malignancies; however, they can negatively impact both the physical and mental status of patients. Hence, it is reasonable to consider resistance and aerobic exercise training to prevent these negative health outcomes. Further, several factors prevent patients from attending outpatient exercise training programs, and, therefore, a semisupervised home-based exercise training program may be seen as a well-accepted alternative. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study will be to investigate the effects of a semisupervised home-based exercise training program on physical performance, body composition, and self-reported outcomes; changes in the initial cancer treatment dose prescribed; number of hospitalizations at 3, 6, and 9 months; and 12-month survival in people with primary lung or head and neck cancer. METHODS: Participants will be randomly allocated to the training group (TG) or control group (CG). The TG will undergo semisupervised home-based resistance and aerobic exercise training throughout their cancer treatment. The resistance training will be performed using elastic bands (TheraBand) twice a week. The aerobic training (ie, brisk walk) will be performed for at least 20 minutes per day outdoors. The equipment and tools used during the training sessions will be provided. This intervention will start the week before treatment commencement, will be performed throughout the duration of the treatment, and will continue for 2 weeks after treatment completion. The CG will undergo usual care (ie, cancer treatment with no formal exercise prescription). Assessments will take place 2 weeks before the beginning of the usual cancer treatment and 2 weeks after treatment completion. The measures of physical function (peripheral muscle strength, functional exercise capacity, and physical activity), body composition, and self-reported outcomes (symptoms of anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life, and symptoms related to the disease and treatment) will be collected. We will report on any change in the initial cancer treatment dose prescribed; number of hospitalizations at 3, 6, and 9 months; and 12-month survival. RESULTS: In February 2021, the clinical trial registration was approved. Recruitment and data collection for the trial are ongoing (as of April 2023, 20 participants had already been randomized), and findings of this study are likely to be published late in 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This exercise training as a complementary treatment for patients with cancer is likely to promote positive effects on the health outcomes assessed, over and above any change in the CG, and prevent the reduction of initial cancer treatment dose prescribed. If these positive effects are shown, they will likely impact long-term outcomes such as hospitalizations and 12-month survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC) RBR-5cyvzh9; https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-5cyvzh9. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/43547.
RESUMEN
Background & Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sorafenib treatment compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent local ablation. Methods: The SORAMIC trial is a randomised controlled trial with diagnostic, local ablation, and palliative sub-study arms. After initial imaging within the diagnostic study, patients were assigned to local ablation or palliative arms. In the local ablation cohort, patients were randomised 1:1 to local ablation + sorafenib vs. local ablation + placebo. The primary endpoint was time-to-recurrence (TTR). Secondary endpoints were local control rate and safety in terms of adverse events and quality-of-life. Results: The recruitment was terminated prematurely after 104 patients owing to slow recruitment. One patient was excluded because of a technical failure. Fifty-four patients were randomised to local ablation + sorafenib and 49 to local ablation + placebo. Eighty-eight patients who underwent standardised follow-up imaging comprised the per-protocol population. The median TTR was 15.2 months in the sorafenib arm and 16.4 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI 0.53-2.2; p = 0.82). Out of 136 lesions ablated within the trial, there was no difference in local recurrence rate between sorafenib (6/69, 8.6%) and placebo groups (5/67, 5.9%; p = 0.792).Overall (92.5% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.008) and drug-related (81.4% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.003) adverse events were more common in the sorafenib arm compared with the placebo arm. Dose reduction because of adverse events were common in the sorafenib arm (79.6% vs. 30.6%, p <0.001). Conclusions: Adjuvant sorafenib did not improve in TTR or local control rate after local ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the limitations of an early terminated trial. Impact and implications: Local ablation is the standard of care treatment in patients with early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma, along with surgical therapies. However, there is a risk of disease recurrence during follow-up. Sorafenib, an oral medication, is a routinely used treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This study found that sorafenib treatment after local ablation in people with early hepatocellular carcinoma did not significantly improve the disease-free period compared with placebo. Clinical trial number: EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645.
RESUMEN
Background & Aims: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is recommended for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma devoid of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread but not eligible for curative therapies. We compared the efficacy and safety of the combination of a single TACE and external conformal radiotherapy (CRT) vs. classical TACE. Methods: TACERTE was an open-labelled, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation rate to two or three TACE (arm A) or one TACE + CRT (arm B). Participants had a mean age of 70 years, and 86% were male. The aetiology was alcohol in 85%. The primary endpoint was liver progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. The typical CRT schedule was 54 Gy in 18 sessions of 3 Gy. Results: Of the 120 participants randomised, 64 were in arm A and 56 in arm B; 100 participants underwent the planned schedule and defined the 'per-protocol' group. In intention-to-treat participants, the liver PFS at 12 and 18 months were 59% and 19% in arm A and 61% and 36% in arm B (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69; 95% CI 0.40-1.18; p = 0.17), respectively. In the per-protocol population, treated liver PFS tended to be better in arm B (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.34-1.06; p = 0.081) than in arm A. Liver-related grade III-IV adverse events were more frequent in arm B than in arm A. Median overall survival reached 30 months (95% CI 23-35) in arm A and 22 months (95% CI 15.7-26.2) in arm B. Conclusions: Although TACE + CRT tended to improve local control, this first Western randomised controlled trial showed that the combined strategy failed to increase PFS or overall survival and led more frequently to liver-related adverse effects. Impact and implications: Hepatocellular carcinoma is frequently treated by arterial embolisation of the tumour and more recently by external radiotherapy. We tried to determine whether combination of the two treatments (irradiation after embolisation) might produce interesting results. Our results in this prospective randomised study were not able to demonstrate a beneficial effect of combining embolisation and irradiation in these patients. On the contrary, we observed more adverse effects with the combined treatment. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01300143.
RESUMEN
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence is higher in men with prostate cancer (PC) than without. Objectives: We describe the rate and correlates of poor cardiovascular risk factor control among men with PC. Methods: We prospectively characterized 2,811 consecutive men (mean age 68 ± 8 years) with PC from 24 sites in Canada, Israel, Brazil, and Australia. We defined poor overall risk factor control as ≥3 of the following: suboptimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (>2 mmol/L if Framingham Risk Score [FRS] ≥15 and ≥3.5 mmol/L if FRS <15), current smoker, physical inactivity (<600 MET min/wk), suboptimal blood pressure (BP) (≥140/90 mm Hg if no other risk factors, systolic BP ≥120 mm Hg if known CVD or FRS ≥15, and ≥130/80 mm Hg if diabetic), and waist:hip ratio >0.9. Results: Among participants (9% with metastatic PC and 23% with pre-existing CVD), 99% had ≥1 uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factor, and 51% had poor overall risk factor control. Not taking a statin (odds ratio [OR]: 2.55; 95% CI: 2.00-3.26), physical frailty (OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.51-3.71), need for BP drugs (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.84-3.03), and age (OR per 10-year increase: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.59) were associated with poor overall risk factor control after adjustment for education, PC characteristics, androgen deprivation therapy, depression, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group functional status. Conclusions: Poor control of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors is common in men with PC, highlighting the large gap in care and the need for improved interventions to optimize cardiovascular risk management in this population.