RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of a patient's general status on perioperative morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy, and to assess which of the used scales is best for the prediction of major complications. The data of 331 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, who underwent radical cystectomy, were analyzed. The general status was assessed according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), and Geriatric-8 (G-8) scales. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. In a group of patients with the highest complication rate according to the Clavien-Dindo scale, (i) statistically more patients rated high according to the ASA and ECOG scales, (ii) patients had significantly higher CCI scores (minor complications (I-II), and (iii) there were significantly more patients rated as frail with G8-predominantly those with 11 points or fewer in the scale. A patient's general status should be assessed before the start of therapy because patients with a high risk of death or serious complications (evaluated with any rating scale) should be offered conservative treatment. None of the scales can describe the risk of cystectomy, because the percentage of patients with major complications among those who achieved worse score results on any scale was not significantly different from the percentage of patients with major complications in the general group.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The characteristics of COVID-19 in haematologic patients compared to non-haematologic patients have seldom been analyzed. Our aim was to analyze whether there are differences in clinical characteristics and outcome of haematologic patients with COVID-19 as compared to non-haematologic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in 2 University hospitals of patients admitted with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 included in the SEMICOVID19 database. The cohort with underlying haematologic disease was compared to a cohort of age and date-of-COVID-19-matched controls without haematologic disease (1:2). RESULTS: 71 cases and 142 controls were included from March-May 2020.Twenty (28.1%) had received recent chemotherapy. Twelve (16.9%) were stem cell transplant recipients (SCT). Eleven (15.5%) were neutropenic concurrently with COVID-19 diagnosis.Haematologic patients presented ARDS (58.5 vs 20.7%, p = 0.0001), thrombotic complications (15.7 vs 2.1%, p = 0.002), DIC (5.7 vs 0.0%, p = 0.011), heart failure (14.3 vs 4.9%, p = 0.029) and required ICU admission (15.5 vs 2.8%, p = 0.001), MV (14.1% vs 2.1%, p 0.001), steroid (64.8 vs 33.1%, p = 0.0001), tocilizumab (33.8 vs 8.5%, p = 0.0001) or anakinra treatment (9.9% vs 0%, p = 0.0001) more often. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher (38.0% vs 18.3%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest COVID-19 has worse outcomes in haematologic patients than in non-haematologic, independently of age, and that the development of ARDS and thrombotic complications drive the higher in-hospital mortality.