RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The progression of osteoarthritis in lateral compartment has been identified as a primary complication in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revisions, irrespective of whether employing fixed bearing (FB) or mobile bearing (MB) designs. Compared to the previous contact point analyses, the tibiofemoral contacts during knee movements are comprehended by a more comprehensive understanding of joint spaces. This study aims to dynamically map the joint spaces in the lateral compartment during the single-leg lunge following FB and MB UKA procedures, and compare them with the respective contralateral native knees. It is hypothesized that the significant change in joint space for post-UKA compared to their native knees. METHODS: Twelve patients with unilateral medial FB UKA and eleven patients with unilateral medial MB UKA were included and underwent computed tomography scans. The exclusion criteria included anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, postoperative knee pain, any postoperative complications, and musculoskeletal illnesses. A dual fluoroscopic imaging system was utilized to capture the single-leg lunge, and 2D-to-3D registration facilitated the visualization of knee motion. According to the knee motions, joint spaces on tibial and femoral surfaces in the lateral compartments of native, FB, and MB UKA knees were calculated and mapped. RESULTS: In comparison to the native knees, FB UKA knees exhibited significant increases in medial, lateral, central, and posterior joint spaces in the lateral compartment (p < 0.05), while MB UKA knees showed significant increases only in central and posterior joint spaces (p < 0.05). Moreover, FB UKA demonstrated greater increases in medial, central, and posterior joint spaces compared to MB UKA. Tibial varus and valgus during lunges, as well as the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA), correlated with joint spaces. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic joint space analysis provided a more comprehensive insight into contact dynamics. FB UKA led to an enlargement of joint spaces, whereas MB UKA resulted in joint spaces closer to native knees. These findings contribute to understanding potential postoperative complication in UKAs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Biomechanical modeling of the knee during motion is a pivotal component in disease treatment, implant designs, and rehabilitation strategies. Historically, dynamic simulations of the knee have been scant. This study uniquely integrates a dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) to investigate the in vivo dynamic behavior of the meniscus during functional activities using a finite element (FE) model. The model was subsequently validated through experiments. Motion capture of a single-leg lunge was executed by DFIS. The motion model was reconstructed using 2D-to-3D registration in conjunction with computed tomography (CT) scans. Both CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data facilitated the development of the knee FE model. In vivo knee displacements and rotations were utilized as driving conditions for the FE model. Moreover, a 3D-printed model, accompanied with digital imaging correlation (DIC), was used to evaluate the accuracy of the FE model. To a better inner view of knees during the DIC analysis, tibia and femur were crafted by transparent resin. The availability of the FE model was guaranteed by the similar strain distribution of the DIC and FE simulation. Subsequent modeling revealed that the compressive stress distribution between the medial and lateral menisci was balanced in the standing posture. As the flexion angle increased, the medial meniscus bore the primary compressive load, with peak stresses occurring between 60 and 80° of flexion. The simulation of a healthy knee provides a critical theoretical foundation for addressing knee pathologies and advancing prosthetic designs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Understanding the motion characteristics of cervical spine through biomechanical analysis aids in the identification of abnormal joint movements. This knowledge is essential for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of related disorders. However, the anatomical structure of the cervical spine is complex, and traditional medical imaging techniques have certain limitations. Capturing the movement characteristics of various parts of the cervical spine in vivo during motion is challenging. The dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) is able to quantify the motion and motion patterns of individual segments. In recent years, DFIS has achieved accurate non-invasive measurements of dynamic joint movements in humans. This review assesses the research findings of DFIS about the cervical spine in healthy and pathological individuals. Relevant study search was conducted up to October 2023 in Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCO databases. After the search, a total of 30 studies were ultimately included. Among them, 13 studies focused on healthy cervical spines, while 17 studies focused on pathological cervical spines. These studies mainly centered on exploring the vertebral bodies and associated structures of the cervical spine, including intervertebral discs, intervertebral foramina, and zygapophyseal joints. Further research could utilize DFIS to investigate cervical spine motion in different populations and under pathological conditions.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Landing from heights is a common movement for active-duty military personnel during training. And the additional load they carry while performing these tasks can affect the kinetics and ankle kinematic of the landing. Traditional motion capture techniques are limited in accurately capturing the in vivo kinematics of the talus. This study aims to investigate the effect of additional trunk load on the kinematics of the talocrural and subtalar joints during landing, using a dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS). METHODS: Fourteen healthy male participants were recruited. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on the right ankle of each participant to create three-dimensional (3D) models of the talus, tibia, and calcaneus. High-speed DFIS was used to capture the images of participants performing single-leg landing jumps from a height of 40 cm. A weighted vest was used to apply additional load, with a weight of 16 kg. Fluoroscopic images were acquired with or without additional loading condition. Kinematic data were obtained by importing the DFIS data and the 3D models in virtual environment software for 2D-3D registration. The kinematics and kinetics were compared between with or without additional loading conditions. RESULTS: During added trunk loading condition, the medial-lateral translation range of motion (ROM) at the talocrural joint significantly increased (p < 0.05). The subtalar joint showed more extension at 44-56 ms (p < 0.05) after contact. The subtalar joint was more eversion at 40-48 ms (p < 0.05) after contact under the added trunk load condition. The peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) significantly increased (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With the added trunk load, there is a significant increase in peak vGRF during landing. The medial-lateral translation ROM of the talocrural joint increases. And the kinematics of the subtalar joint are affected. The observed biomechanical changes may be associated with the high incidence of stress fractures in training with added load.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Foot kinematics, such as excessive eversion and malalignment of the hindfoot, are believed to be associated with running-related injuries. The majority of studies to date show that different foot strike patterns influence these specific foot and ankle kinematics. However, technical deficiencies in traditional motion capture approaches limit knowledge of in vivo joint kinematics with respect to rearfoot and forefoot strike patterns (RFS and FFS, respectively). This study uses a high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) to determine the effects of different foot strike patterns on 3D in vivo tibiotalar and subtalar joints kinematics. METHODS: Fifteen healthy male recreational runners underwent foot computed tomography scanning for the construction of 3-dimensional models. A high-speed DFIS (100 Hz) was used to collect 6 degrees of freedom kinematics for participants' tibiotalar and subtalar joints when they adopted RFS and FFS in barefoot condition. RESULTS: Compared with RFS, FFS exhibited greater internal rotation at 0%-20% of the stance phase in the tibiotalar joint. The peak internal rotation angle of the tibiotalar joint under FFS was greater than under RFS (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.92). RFS showed more dorsiflexion at 0%-20% of the stance phase in the tibiotalar joint than FFS. RFS also presented a larger anterior translation (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.28) in the subtalar joint at initial contact than FFS. CONCLUSION: Running with acute barefoot FFS increases the internal rotation of the tibiotalar joint in the early stance. The use of high-speed DFIS to quantify the movement of the tibiotalar and subtalar joint was critical to revealing the effects of RFS and FFS during running.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: Ankle braces can affect the kinematics of the ankle joint during landing tasks. Previous studies were primarily relied on traditional marker-based motion capture systems, which pose limitations in non-invasively capturing the motion of the talus bone. The effect of ankle braces on the in vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints during landing remains unknown. This study used a high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate effect of ankle braces on the in vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints during landing. Methods: Fourteen healthy participants were recruited for this study. During the experiment, static three-dimensional MRI data were collected for each participant, and 3D ankle joint models for the calcaneus, talus, and tibia were constructed. The DFIS was used to capture the images of each participant performing a single-leg landing-jump task at a height of 40 cm. The images were captured once with and without a brace in the fatigue condition, which was induced by running. The six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) kinematic data were obtained by 2D-3D registration. Results: The flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) (42.73 ± 4.76° vs. 38.74 ± 5.43°, p = 0.049) and anterior-posterior translation ROM (16.86 ± 1.74 mm vs. 15.03 ± 1.73 mm, p = 0.009) of the tibiotalar joint were decreased. The maximum inversion angle (-3.71 ± 2.25° vs. 2.11 ± 1.83°, p = 0.047) of the subtalar joint was decreased. Conclusion: The ankle brace limited the flexion-extension ROM of the tibiotalar joints and the inversion angle of the subtalar joint during landing.

RESUMEN

Objective: Fatigue can affect the ankle kinematic characteristics of landing movements. Traditional marker-based motion capture techniques have difficulty in accurately obtaining the kinematics of the talocrural and subtalar joints. This study aimed to investigate the effects of fatigue on the talocrural and subtalar joints during the landing using dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS). Methods: This study included fourteen healthy participants. The foot of each participant was scanned using magnetic resonance imaging to create 3D models. High-speed DFIS was used to capture images of the ankle joint during participants performing a single-leg landing jump from a height of 40 cm. Fatigue was induced by running and fluoroscopic images were captured before and after fatigue. Kinematic data were obtained by 3D/2D registration in virtual environment software. The joint kinematics in six degrees of freedom and range of motion (ROM) were compared between the unfatigued and fatigued conditions. Results: During landing, after the initial contact with the ground, the main movement of the talocrural joint is extension and abduction, while the subtalar joint mainly performs extension, eversion, and abduction. Compared to unfatigued, during fatigue the maximum medial translation (1.35 ± 0.45 mm vs. 1.86 ± 0.69 mm, p = 0.032) and medial-lateral ROM (3.19 ± 0.60 mm vs. 3.89 ± 0.96 mm, p = 0.029) of the talocrural joint significantly increased, the maximum flexion angle (0.83 ± 1.24° vs. 2.11 ± 1.80°, p = 0.037) of the subtalar joint significantly increased, and the flexion-extension ROM (6.17 ± 2.21° vs. 7.97 ± 2.52°, p = 0.043) of the subtalar joint significantly increased. Conclusion: This study contributes to the quantitative understanding of the normal function of the talocrural and subtalar joints during high-demand activities. During landing, the main movement of the talocrural joint is extension and abduction, while the subtalar joint mainly performs extension, eversion, and abduction. Under fatigue conditions, the partial ROM of the talocrural and subtalar joints increases.

RESUMEN

Kinematics of the knee during gait has mostly been studied using optical motion capture systems (MCS). The presence of soft tissue artifacts (STA) between the skin markers and the underlying bone presents a major impediment to obtaining a reliable joint kinematics assessment. In this study, we determined the effects of STA on the calculation of knee joint kinematics during walking and running, through the combination of high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) and magnetic resonance imaging technique. Ten adults walked and ran while data was collected simultaneously from MCS and high-speed DFIS. The study showed that measured STA underestimated knee flexion angle, but overestimated knee external and varus rotation. The absolute error values of the skin markers derived from knee flexion-extension angle, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus rotation during walking were -3.2 ± 4.3 deg, 4.6 ± 3.1 deg, and 4.5 ± 3.2 deg respectively, and during running were -5.8 ± 5.4 deg, 6.6 ± 3.7 deg, and 4.8 ± 2.5 deg respectively. Average errors relative to the DFIS for flexion-extension angle, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus rotation were 78 %, 271 %, 265 % during walking respectively, and were 43 %, 106 %, 200 % during running respectively. This study offers reference for the kinematic differences between MCS and high-speed DFIS, and will contribute to optimizing methods for analyzing knee kinematics during walking and running.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Accurately obtaining the in vivo motion of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA), first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ), and plantar fascia (PF) is essential for analyzing the biomechanics of these structures in different running strike patterns. Most previous studies on the biomechanics of the MLA, first MTPJ, and PF have been based on traditional skin-marker-based motion capture, which cannot acquire the natural foot motion. Therefore, this study aimed to 1) describe the movement of the MLA, first MTPJ, and PF during running by using the high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) and 2) explore changes of the in vivo kinematics of the MLA and first MTPJ, and the length of the PF during the stance phase of running with different foot strike patterns. Fifteen healthy male runners all of whom ran with a regular rearfoot strike (RFS) pattern were required to run with forefoot strike (FFS) and RFS patterns. Computed tomography scans were taken from each participant's right foot for the construction of 3D models (the calcaneus, first metatarsal, and first proximal phalanges) and local coordinate systems. A high-speed DFIS (100 Hz) and 3D force platform (2,000 Hz) were used to acquire X-ray images of the foot bones and ground reaction force data during the stance phase of running (3 m/s ± 5%) simultaneously. Then, 3D-2D registration was used to obtain the in vivo kinematic data of the MLA and first MTPJ and the length of the PF. When compared with RFS, in FFS, 1) the range of motion (ROM) of the medial/lateral (5.84 ± 5.61 mm vs. 0.75 ± 3.38 mm, p = 0.002), anterior/posterior (14.64 ± 4.33 mm vs. 11.18 ± 3.56 mm, p = 0.010), plantarflexion/dorsiflexion (7.13 ± 3.22° vs. 1.63 ± 3.29°, p < 0.001), and adduction/abduction (-3.89 ± 3.85° vs. -0.64 ± 4.39°, p = 0.034) motions of the MLA were increased significantly; 2) the ROM of the anterior/posterior (7.81 ± 2.84 mm vs. 6.24 ± 3.43 mm, p = 0.003), superior/inferior (2.11 ± 2.06 mm vs. -0.57 ± 1.65 mm, p = 0.001), and extension/flexion (-9.68 ± 9.16° vs. -5.72 ± 7.33°, p = 0.018) motions of the first MTPJ were increased significantly; 3) the maximum strain (0.093 ± 0.023 vs. 0.075 ± 0.020, p < 0.001) and the maximum power (4.36 ± 1.51 W/kg vs. 3.06 ± 1.39 W/kg, p < 0.001) of the PF were increased significantly. Running with FFS may increase deformation, energy storage, and release of the MLA and PF, as well as the push-off effect of the MTPJ. Meanwhile, the maximum extension angle of the first MTPJ and MLA deformation increased in FFS, which showed that the PF experienced more stretch and potentially indicated that FFS enhanced the PF mechanical responses.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The glenoid track concept has been widely used to assess the risk of instability due to bipolar bone loss. The glenoid track width was commonly used as 83% of the glenoid width to determine if a lesion was on-track or off-track. However, the value was obtained under static conditions, and it may not be able to reflect the actual mechanism of traumatic dislocation during motion. PURPOSE: To compare the glenoid track width under dynamic and static conditions using a dual-fluoroscopic imaging system. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: In total, 40 shoulders of 20 healthy volunteers were examined for both dynamic and static tests within a dual-fluoroscopic imaging system at 5 different arm positions: 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 150° of abduction, keeping the shoulder at 90° of external rotation. The participants performed a fast horizontal arm backswing for dynamic tests while keeping their arm in maximum horizontal extension for static tests. Computed tomography scans were used to create 3-dimensional models of the humerus and scapula for 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional image registration. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained to delineate the medial margin of the rotator cuff insertion. The glenoid track width was measured as the distance from the anterior rim of the glenoid to the medial margin of the rotator cuff insertion and compared between static and dynamic conditions. RESULTS: The mean glenoid track widths at 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 150° of abduction were significantly smaller under dynamic conditions (88%, 81%, 72%, 69%, and 68% of the glenoid width) than those under static conditions (101%, 92%, 84%, 78%, and 77% of the glenoid width) (all P < .001). The glenoid track width significantly decreased with the increasing abduction angles in the range of 30° to 120° under static conditions (all P < .003) and 30° to 90° under dynamic conditions (all P < .001). CONCLUSION: A smaller dynamic-based value should be considered for the glenoid track width when distinguishing on-track/off-track lesions. Clinical evidence is needed to establish the superiority of the dynamic-based value over the static-based value as an indicator for augmentation procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Some off-track lesions might be misclassified as on-track lesions when the original commonly used static-based value of 83% is used as the glenoid track width.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Shoes affect the biomechanical properties of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) and further influence the foot's overall function. Most previous studies on the MLA were based on traditional skin-marker motion capture, and the observation of real foot motion inside the shoes is difficult. Thus, the effect of shoe parameters on the natural MLA movement during running remains in question. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differences in the MLA's kinematics between shod and barefoot running by using a high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS). Fifteen healthy habitual rearfoot runners were recruited. All participants ran at a speed of 3 m/s ± 5% along with an elevated runway in barefoot and shod conditions. High-speed DFIS was used to acquire the radiographic images of MLA movements in the whole stance phase, and the kinematics of the MLA were calculated. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare the kinematic characteristics of the MLA during the stance phase between shod and barefoot conditions. Compared with barefoot, shoe-wearing showed significant changes (p < 0.05) as follows: 1) the first metatarsal moved with less lateral direction at 80%, less anterior translation at 20%, and less superiority at 10-70% of the stance phase; 2) the first metatarsal moved with less inversion amounting to 20-60%, less dorsiflexion at 0-10% of the stance phase; 3) the inversion/eversion range of motion (ROM) of the first metatarsal relative to calcaneus was reduced; 4) the MLA angles at 0-70% of the stance phase were reduced; 5) the maximum MLA angle and MLA angle ROM were reduced in the shod condition. Based on high-speed DFIS, the above results indicated that shoe-wearing limited the movement of MLA, especially reducing the MLA angles, suggesting that shoes restricted the compression and recoil of the MLA, which further affected the spring-like function of the MLA.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurements of in-vivo knee joint kinematics are essential to elucidate healthy knee motion and the changes that accompany injury and repair. Although numerous experimental measurements have been reported, the accurate non-invasive analysis of in-vivo knee kinematics remains a challenge in biomechanics. RESEARCH QUESTION: The study objective was to investigate in-vivo knee kinematics before, at, and after contact during walking and running using a combined high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique. METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) knee models of ten participants were created using MR images. Knee kinematics during walking and running were determined using high-speed DFIS. The 3D knee models were then related to fluoroscopic images to obtain in-vivo six-degrees-of-freedom knee kinematics. RESULTS: Before contact knee flexion, external femoral rotation, and proximal-distal distance were 11.9°, 3.4°, and 1.0 mm greater during running compared to walking, respectively. Similar differences were observed at initial contact (9.9°, 7.9°, and 0.9 mm, respectively) and after contact (6.4°, 2.2°, and 0.8 mm, respectively). Posterior femoral translation at initial contact was also increased during running compared to walking. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated accurate instantaneous in-vivo knee kinematic characteristics that may further the understanding of the intrinsic biomechanics of the knee during gait.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The biomechanics of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is affected by different shoe conditions. In the biomechanical research field, traditional skin marker motion capture cannot easily acquire the in vivo joint kinematics of the first MTPJ in shoes. Thus, the present study aims to investigate the differences of the first MTPJ's six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) kinematics between shod and barefoot running by using a high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS). In total, 15 healthy male runners were recruited. Computed tomography scans were taken from each participant's right foot for the construction of 3D models and local coordinate systems. Radiographic images were acquired at 100 Hz while the participants ran at a speed of 3 m/s ± 5% in shod and barefoot conditions along an elevated runway, and 6DOF kinematics of the first MTPJ were calculated by 3D-2D registration. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare the kinematic characteristics of the first MTPJ 6DOF kinematics during the stance phase between shod and barefoot conditions. Compared with barefoot, wearing shoes showed significant changes (p < 0.05): 1) the first MTPJ moved less inferior at 50% but moved less superior at 90 and 100% of the stance phase; 2) the peak medial, posterior, and superior translation of the first MTPJ significantly decreased in the shod condition; 3) the extension angle of the first MTPJ was larger at 30-60% but smaller at 90 and 100% of the stance phase; 4) the maximum extension angle and flexion/extension range of motion of the first MTPJ were reduced; and 5) the minimum extension and adduction angle of the first MTPJ was increased in the shod condition. On the basis of the high-speed DFIS, the aforementioned results indicated that wearing shoes limited the first MTPJ flexion and extension movement and increased the adduction angle, suggesting that shoes may affect the propulsion of the first MTPJ and increase the risk of hallux valgus.

RESUMEN

Foot and ankle joints are complicated anatomical structures that combine the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. They play an extremely important role in walking, running, jumping and other dynamic activities of the human body. The in vivo kinematic analysis of the foot and ankle helps deeply understand the movement characteristics of these structures, as well as identify abnormal joint movements and treat related diseases. However, the technical deficiencies of traditional medical imaging methods limit studies on in vivo foot and ankle biomechanics. During the last decade, the dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) has enabled the accurate and noninvasive measurements of the dynamic and static activities in the joints of the body. Thus, this method can be utilised to quantify the movement in the single bones of the foot and ankle and analyse different morphological joints and complex bone positions and movement patterns within these organs. Moreover, it has been widely used in the field of image diagnosis and clinical biomechanics evaluation. The integration of existing single DFIS studies has great methodological reference value for future research on the foot and ankle. Therefore, this review evaluated existing studies that applied DFIS to measure the in vivo kinematics of the foot and ankle during various activities in healthy and pathologic populations. The difference between DFIS and traditional biomechanical measurement methods was shown. The advantages and shortcomings of DFIS in practical application were further elucidated, and effective theoretical support and constructive research direction for future studies on the human foot and ankle were provided.

RESUMEN

The technical deficiencies in traditional medical imagining methods limit the study of in vivo ankle biomechanics. A dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) provides accurate and non-invasive measurements of dynamic and static activities in joints of the body. This approach can be used to quantify the movement in the single bones of the ankle and analyse different morphological and complex bone positions and movement patterns within these organs and has been widely used in the field of image diagnosis and evaluation of clinical biomechanics. This paper reviews the applications of DFIS that were used to measure the in vivo kinematics of the ankle in the field of clinical and sports medicine. The advantages and shortcomings of DFIS in the practical application are summarised. We further put forward effective research programs for understanding the movement as well as injury mechanism of the ankle in vivo, and provide constructive research direction for future study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The technical deficiencies in traditional medical imagining methods limit the study of

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the translation and rotation of healthy elbow joints during active flexion and extension, so as to provide references for the treatment of elbow instability and injuries. Methods Ten healthy subjects with no history of upper extremity trauma were recruited. Dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) was applied to quantify six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) kinematics of humeroulnar and humeroradial joint from full extension to maximum flexion in supination position. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the 6-DOF kinematics of the elbow joint. Results Valgus angle of humeroulnar joint gradually decreased from 15.2°±3.1° to 5.3°±2.3° with the flexion increasing. Valgus angle of humeroradical joint gradually decreased from 19.7°±4.2° to 8.2°±2.4° from full extension to maximum flexion. The valgus angle of humeroulnar and humeroradial joint was linearly related to the flexion angle during flexion and extension. The internal rotation of humeroulnar joint was quadratic nonlinearly related to the flexion angle during motion. The maximum internal rotation of the ulnar was 4.0°±4.9° at 110° flexion, and the maximum external rotation was 5.1°±4.2°. The internal rotation of humeroulnar joint gradually increased from 3.2°±16.0° to 27.2°±18.0°. Conclusions During normal flexion and extension of the elbow, the valgus angle of humeroulnar joint decreased linearly, while the internal and external rotation angle showed a nonlinear change, which first rotated internally and then rotated externally. The valgus angle of humeroradial joint decreased linearly and the internal rotation angle increased linearly. Therefore, humeroulnar joint is not a hinge joint during elbow flexion and extension. There is a kinematic difference between humeroulnar joint and humeroracial joint. For clinical treatment of complex elbow injuries, elbow instability and elbow replacement, different motion characteristics in joints should be considered to improve the outcome after surgery.

RESUMEN

Patients with mechanic ankle instability experience increased tibiotalar and subtalar joint laxity. However, in vivo joint kinematics in functional ankle instability (FAI) patients and lateral ankle sprain (LAS) copers, especially during dynamic activities, are poorly understood. Ten FAI patients, 10 LAS copers, and 10 healthy controls were included in this study. A dual fluoroscopic imaging system was used to analyze the tibiotalar and subtalar joint kinematics during stair descent. Five key poses of stair descent were analyzed. Kinematic data from six degrees of freedom were calculated utilizing a solid modeling software. The range of motion and joint positions in each degree of freedom were compared among the three groups. The tibiotalar joints of FAI patients and LAS copers were significantly more inverted than those of healthy controls during the foot strike (p = 0.016, ηp2 = 0.264). The subtalar joints of FAI patients were significantly more anteriorly translated (pose 2, p = 0.003, ηp2 = 0.352; pose 3, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.454; pose 4, p = 0.004, ηp2 = 0.334), inverted (pose 4, p = 0.027, ηp2 = 0.234; pose 5,p = 0.034, ηp2 = 0.221), and externally rotated (pose 4, p = 0.037, ηp2 = 0.217; pose 5; p = 0.004, ηp2 = 0.331) than those of healthy controls during the mid-stance and the heel off. The FAI patients showed excessive tibiotalar inversion and subtalar joint hypermobility during stair descent. Meanwhile, the LAS copers maintained subtalar joint stability, and only showed excessive tibiotalar inversion in foot strike. These data provide insight into the mechanisms behind the development of FAI after initial LAS. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1860-1867, 2019.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To observe the obstacle of mandible to the cervical spine with the aid of dual fluoroscopic imaging system, explore the optimal perspective Methods of in vivo kinematics of cervical spine, and verify the feasibility of cervical in vivo kinematic researches. Methods A dual fluoroscopic imaging system composed of two C-arms placed in different angles was utilized. X ray images of the cervical spine for five healthy volunteers (4 male, 1 female) with standing, flexion extension, twisting and bending positions were obtained with the C-arms in the angle of 90°, 60°and 45°, respectively. The obstacles of mandible to the cervical spine in different positions were compared and the obstacle degree of mandible to the cervical spine was evaluated to screen the optimal perspective Methods. The perspective images under conventional head rotation and coaxial trunk rotation were collected during cervical twisting to compare the obstacle of mandible to cervical images. Results There were significant differences in mandibular obstacle degrees among the three angles measured in standing, flexion-extension, twisting and bending positions（P<0.05）. With two C-arms in 45°, the cervical spine was best imaged with the least obstacle. With two C-arms in 60°, significant differences could be found between the coaxial trunk rotation and the head rotation group. Conclusions For in vivo kinematics study of cervical spine, the obstacle of mandible to the cervical spine can be minimized with C-arms of dual fluoroscopic imaging system in 45°, and the coaxial trunk rotation can decrease the mandibular obstacle degrees as compared with the head rotation, which satisfy the requirement of 2D-3D image matching.