RESUMEN
Abstract: The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty has been popularized in the last decade as a minimally invasive approach used by many surgeons, including the authors, to preserve the integrity of muscle groups and their insertions and the dynamic hip stability resulting in less surgical trauma and faster recovery process with decreased postoperative pain. This surgical approach is not without a variety of complications and pitfalls. This review aims to identify any potential drawbacks and challenges associated with the DAA in THA and guide surgeons on minimizing and avoiding them.
Resumen: El abordaje anterior directo (AAD) en artroplastía total de cadera se ha popularizado en la última década como un abordaje de mínima invasión utilizado por varios cirujanos, incluyendo a los autores, con la ventaja de preservar la integridad de los grupos musculares de la cadera y sus inserciones, así como la estabilidad dinámica de la articulación, resultando en menor trauma quirúrgico y una recuperación más rápida con menos dolor postoperatorio, a pesar de esto, el abordaje quirúrgico no está exento de complicaciones. El propósito de esta revisión es describir los riesgos y complicaciones potenciales relacionados al abordaje anterior directo en cirugía de artroplastía total de cadera y presentar una guía de cómo minimizarlas o evitarlas.
RESUMEN
Introducción: La artroplastia de cadera se considera un tratamiento exitoso en ortopedia. El abordaje anterior directo, a través del intervalo de Hueter, evita la disección de inserciones musculares del hueso y disminuye la alteración de los tejidos blandos alrededor de la cadera. Objetivos: Presentar los resultados de artroplastias totales de cadera primarias, realizadas por abordaje anterior directo. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo-prospectivo, tipo serie de casos, con pacientes intervenidos por artroplastia total de cadera primaria no cementada a través de abordaje anterior directo. Resultados: Predominaron el sexo femenino y los grupos etarios de 45 y 60 años. El índice de masa corporal resultó bajo y hubo escaso riesgo anestésico. El tiempo quirúrgico superó las dos horas, con escaso sangrado operatorio. La correcta colocación del componente acetabular y el femoral permitió que la deambulación iniciara en menos de tres días. Las complicaciones fueron escasas y se resolvieron con el tratamiento adecuado. Conclusiones: El empleo de abordaje anterior directo para artroplastias totales de cadera primarias ofrece resultados muy satisfactorios(AU)
Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is considered a successful treatment in Orthopedics. The direct anterior approach, through Hueter interval, avoids the dissection of muscular attachments to the bone and decreases the alteration of the soft tissues around the hip. Objectives: To report the results of primary total hip arthroplasties, performed by direct anterior approach. Methods: A descriptive-prospective case series study was carried out with patients who underwent primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach. Results: The female sex and the age groups of 45 and 60 years predominated. The body mass index was low and there was little anesthetic risk. Surgical time exceeded two hours, with little operative bleeding. The correct placement of the acetabular and femoral components allowed ambulation to begin in less than three days. Complications were rare and resolved with appropriate treatment. Conclusions: The use of the direct anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasties offers very satisfactory results(AU)
RESUMEN
The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty has been popularized in the last decade as a minimally invasive approach used by many surgeons, including the authors, to preserve the integrity of muscle groups and their insertions and the dynamic hip stability resulting in less surgical trauma and faster recovery process with decreased postoperative pain. This surgical approach is not without a variety of complications and pitfalls. This review aims to identify any potential drawbacks and challenges associated with the DAA in THA and guide surgeons on minimizing and avoiding them.
El abordaje anterior directo (AAD) en artroplastía total de cadera se ha popularizado en la última década como un abordaje de mínima invasión utilizado por varios cirujanos, incluyendo a los autores, con la ventaja de preservar la integridad de los grupos musculares de la cadera y sus inserciones, así como la estabilidad dinámica de la articulación, resultando en menor trauma quirúrgico y una recuperación más rápida con menos dolor postoperatorio, a pesar de esto, el abordaje quirúrgico no está exento de complicaciones. El propósito de esta revisión es describir los riesgos y complicaciones potenciales relacionados al abordaje anterior directo en cirugía de artroplastía total de cadera y presentar una guía de cómo minimizarlas o evitarlas.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Cirujanos , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The direct anterior approach (DAA) is increasingly used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although the DAA can reduce pain, recovery time, and dislocations in nondysplastic hips, few studies report its results in patients with severe dysplasia. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of primary THA through the DAA with cup placement at the true acetabulum in hips with severe dysplasia. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 23 consecutive patients (29 hips) who underwent THA by DAA for osteoarthritis secondary to Crowe III-IV dysplasia. Surgical procedures were performed on a traction table, and the acetabular cup was placed in the true acetabulum. Patients were assessed clinically (complications, modified Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Oxford Hip Score) and radiographically (radiolucencies, subsidence, leg length discrepancies, cup inclination, and cup coverage) at a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: One patient (2 hips) died with original implants (at 13 and 14 years), 3 patients (3 hips) were revised due to wear-induced loosening (at 14, 16, and 18 years), and there were no dislocations or infections. The remaining 19 patients (24 hips) were assessed at 8.4 ± 4.7 years (range 2-20); 2 patients (2 hips) had complications that required reoperation without implant removal. The modified Harris Hip Score improved from 32 ± 9 to 94 ± 7, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index from 46 ± 18 to 90 ± 7, and Oxford Hip Score was 56 ± 4. Patients were very satisfied (90%) or satisfied (10%). Limb length discrepancy was 2.5 ± 9.0 mm. CONCLUSION: THA through the DAA with cup placement at the true acetabulum provides satisfactory mid to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes compared to other approaches for hips with severe dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.