RESUMEN
Risankizumab has shown efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). The use of risankizumab in the treatment of CD of the pouch has not been previously reported. Here, we have 10 patients with biologics exposed CD of the pouch treated with risankizumab. Some patients showed endoscopic improvement regarding inflammation with minimal clinical improvement. Our findings warrant further study to validate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in the treatment of CD of the pouch.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The value of histologic assessment after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been definitively determined. We evaluated the correlation between histology and endoscopic findings, as well as the proportion of patients with inflammation in areas beyond the pouch body on their initial pouchoscopy after IPAA. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients who underwent IPAA for UC between 2012 and 2020 and subsequently underwent a pouchoscopy with routine biopsies of the pouch body, pre-pouch ileum, and rectal cuff. We compared endoscopic and histologic assessments in each location using χ2 testing and Spearman correlation, as well as the development of pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (CLDP) in longitudinal follow-up. RESULTS: Among 126 patients, the median time to pouchoscopy after IPAA was 384 days, with 82 patients (65%) having inflammation of the pouch body. Significantly more patients with pouch body inflammation had histologic inflammation compared with patients without pouch body inflammation (96% vs 22%, Pâ <â .001, râ =â 0.769). Additionally, 16 patients (13%) were found to have endoscopic inflammation of the pre-pouch ileum with corresponding histologic inflammation in 88%; of these, 31% later developed CLDP. In contrast, 13% of patients with no endoscopic inflammation displayed histologic inflammation, with none later developing CLDP. Forty-six percent of patients had rectal cuff inflammation (correlation with histologic inflammation râ =â 0.580). CONCLUSIONS: In our evaluation, the added benefit of histology in the presence of visible endoscopic inflammation for disease activity assessment scores is unclear. The prognostic value of histologic inflammation without endoscopic inflammation warrants a longitudinal study.
Endoscopic evaluation after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should include anatomic areas beyond the pouch body, including the rectal cuff and the pre-pouch ileum. The added benefit of histology in the presence of visible inflammation when assessing disease activity is unclear.
RESUMEN
Background: In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for whom medical therapy is unsuccessful or who develop colitis-associated neoplasia, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is often indicated. One consideration for surgeons performing this procedure is whether to create this anastomosis using a stapled technique without mucosectomy or using a hand-sewn technique with mucosectomy. This study tested the association between IPAA anastomosis technique and cuffitis and/or pouchitis, assessed endoscopically. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. We included consecutive adult patients with IBD who had undergone IPAA and had received index pouchoscopies at Columbia University Irving Medical Center between 2020 and 2022. Patients were then followed up from this index pouchoscopy for ≤12 months to a subsequent pouchoscopy. The primary exposure was mucosectomy vs non-mucosectomy and the primary outcome was cuffitis and/or pouchitis, defined as a Pouch Disease Activity Index endoscopy subscore of ≥1. Results: There were 76 patients who met study criteria including 49 (64%) who had undergone mucosectomy and 27 (36%) who had not. Rates of cuffitis and/or pouchitis were 49% among those with mucosectomy vs 41% among those without mucosectomy (P = 0.49). Time-to-event analysis affirmed these findings (log-rank P = 0.77). Stricture formation was more likely among patients with mucosectomy compared with those without mucosectomy (45% vs 19%, P = 0.02). Conclusions: There was no association between anastomosis technique and cuffitis and/or pouchitis among patients with IBD. These results may support the selection of stapled anastomosis over hand-sewn anastomosis with mucosectomy.
RESUMEN
Pouchitis is defined as inflammation of the ileal pouch created during a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Although the incidence of this inflammatory condition is high, the exact etiology often remains unclear and the management challenging. In this review, we summarize the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of this common complication.
Asunto(s)
Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Reservoritis/etiología , Reservoritis/terapia , Humanos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To better inform the risk of cuffitis in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), we aimed to identify its occurrence and associated precolectomy factors in a large multicenter cohort of patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of individuals diagnosed with UC or indeterminate colitis who underwent RPC with IPAA for refractory disease or dysplasia at Mount Sinai Hospital or the University of Chicago followed by at least 1 pouchoscopy with report of the pouch-anal anastomosis. The primary outcome was cuffitis defined as ulceration of the cuff as reported in each pouchoscopy report. RESULTS: The pouch-anal anastomosis was mentioned in the pouchoscopy reports of 674 patients, of whom 525 (77.9%) had a stapled anastomosis. Among these, cuffitis occurred in 313 (59.6%) patients a median of 1.51 (interquartile range 0.59-4.17) years after final surgical stage. On multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.02), extensive disease (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.78), exposure to biologics before colectomy (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.93-3.27), and exposure to at least 2 or more biologics before colectomy (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.40-3.39) were significantly associated with subsequent cuffitis. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study of patients who underwent RPC with stapled IPAA and at least 1 follow-up pouchoscopy, cuffitis occurred in approximately 60% and was significantly associated with extensive disease and exposure to multiple biologics precolectomy.
In this multicenter study of patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with stapled ileal pouchanal anastomosis and at least 1 subsequent pouchoscopy, endoscopic cuffitis occurred in 60% and was significantly associated with extensive disease and exposure to multiple biologics.
RESUMEN
Upadacitinib has shown efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD). The use of upadacitinib in the treatment of chronic antibiotics-refractory pouchitis (CARP), as well as CD of the pouch, has not been previously reported. We treated a series of 6 patients with CARP or CD of the pouch with a minimal 6 weeks of upadacitinib. The patients showed minimal or no significant improvement in clinical and endoscopic presentations. Our findings warrant further study to validate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of CARP or CD of the pouch.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can experience pouch inflammation postoperatively. The use of antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics may be associated with pouch inflammation, but limited data exist on the impact of multiple advanced therapies on development of subsequent pouch inflammation. The aim of this study was to assess for an association between preoperative use of multiple advanced therapies and risk of endoscopically detected inflammatory pouch diseases (EIPDs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of ulcerative colitis (UC) and indeterminate colitis (IBDU) patients who underwent an IPAA at a quaternary care center from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients were grouped based on number and type of preoperative drug exposures. The primary outcome was EIPD within 5 years of IPAA. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-eight patients were included in this analysis. Most of these patients had UC (95.0%) and demonstrated pancolonic disease distribution (86.1%). The majority of patients were male (57.4%) and underwent surgery for medically refractory disease (79.2%). The overall median age at surgery was 38.6 years. Preoperatively, 68 patients were biologic/small molecule-naïve, 125 received anti-TNF agents only, and 105 received non-anti-TNF agents only or multiple classes. Ninety-one patients developed EIPD. There was no significant association between type (P = .38) or number (P = .58) of exposures and EIPD, but older individuals had a lower risk of EIPD (P = .001; hazard ratio, 0.972; 95% confidence interval, 0.956-0.989). CONCLUSION: Development of EIPD was not associated with number or type of preoperative advanced therapies.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservorios Cólicos , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Reservoritis/complicaciones , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Inflamación/complicacionesRESUMEN
In this case series, 6 patients with chronic pouchitis (nâ =â 3), cuffitis (nâ =â 2), or Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (nâ =â 1) were treated with tofacitinib. One patient achieved clinical response; however, all patients ultimately discontinued therapy due to nonresponse or adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Reservorios Cólicos , Reservoritis , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Humanos , Reservoritis/terapia , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently used endoscopic items for the assessment of pouchitis and cuffitis have deficiencies in reliability and validation. We assessed the reliability and accuracy of new endoscopic items for pouchitis and of the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity [UCEIS] for cuffitis. METHODS: Three new endoscopic items were assessed and included in the Monash pouchitis endoscopic subscore: bleeding [absent/contact/spontaneous]; erosions [absent/<10/≥10]; and ulceration [absent/<10%/≥10%]. Three raters evaluated 44 pouchoscopy videos in duplicates, in random order. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of all endoscopic items and UCEIS were assessed. Clinical and histological pouchitis disease activity index [PDAI] subscores were also assessed and faecal calprotectin was measured. RESULTS: All three Monash endoscopic items had substantial intra-rater reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] >0.61 [95% CI >0.61], compared with only ulcers from the currently used PDAI endoscopic subscore, but inter-rater reliability was only substantial for ulceration and no better than those of the currently used endoscopic items. The Monash endoscopic subscore had a strong positive correlation with the reference standard global endoscopic lesion severity r = 0.80 [95% CI 0.80-0.80] and the reference standard PDAI endoscopic subscore r = 0.70 [95% CI 0.67-0.73], which was higher than the correlation observed for the currently used PDAI endoscopic subscore. The UCEIS had substantial intra-rater reliability, but only fair inter-rater reliability and poor diagnostic performance for cuffitis. CONCLUSIONS: The Monash endoscopic items, and endoscopic subscore they generate, have enhanced overall performance compared with the currently used PDAI items and subscore. Further validation and responsiveness to change in disease state are indicated.
Asunto(s)
Reservorios Cólicos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Reservoritis/diagnóstico , Heces/química , Femenino , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reservoritis/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Úlcera/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The true incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in patients with an ileal pouch is unknown, and there is little published on its associated risk factors. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the rate and risk factors of CDI in pouch patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review conducted at a single tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. All ulcerative colitis or IBD-unspecified (IBD-U) patients who underwent total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for medically refractory disease or dysplasia between 2008 and 2017 were identified. Symptomatic patients tested for CDI were included. Demographic, disease, and surgical characteristics were collected. Nonparametric methods were used to compare continuous outcomes, and χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare patients with and without CDI as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 154 pouch patients had postoperative C. difficilestool testing for symptoms of fever, urgency, increased stool frequency, hematochezia, incontinence, and abdominal and/or pelvic pain. CDI was diagnosed in 11 (7.1%) patients a median of 139 days (IQR 34-1,170) after the final surgical stage. Ten patients (90.9%) received oral vancomycin for 10 days and 1 patient (9.1%) received oral metronidazole for 2 weeks. Ten patients (90.9%) reported improvement in symptoms at completion of therapy. Nine patients (81.8%) were retested for CDI for recurrent symptoms and found to be negative. No patient had CDI recurrence. There was no significant difference in demographic and surgical characteristics, previous antibiotic or proton pump inhibitor use, or previous hospital admission among the patients with and without CDI. CONCLUSIONS: CDI is a rare cause of infectious pouchitis and treatment with oral vancomycin improves symptoms.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the gold standard surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with medically refractory disease. The aim of this study was to report the rates and risk factors of inflammatory pouch conditions. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of UC or IBD unspecified (IBDU) patients who underwent TPC with IPAA for refractory disease or dysplasia between 2008 and 2017. Pouchoscopy data were used to calculate rates of inflammatory pouch conditions. Factors associated with outcomes in univariable analysis were investigated in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Of the 621 patients more than 18 years of age who underwent TPC with IPAA between January 2008 and December 2017, pouchoscopy data were available for 386 patients during a median follow-up period of 4 years. Acute pouchitis occurred in 205 patients (53%), 60 of whom (30%) progressed to chronic pouchitis. Cuffitis and Crohn's disease-like condition (CDLC) of the pouch occurred in 119 (30%) patients and 46 (12%) patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, female sex was associated with a decreased risk of acute pouchitis, and pre-operative steroid use and medically refractory disease were associated with an increased risk; IBDU was associated with chronic pouchitis; rectal cuff length ≥2 cm and medically refractory disease were associated with cuffitis; age 45-54 at colectomy was associated with CDLC. Rates of pouch failure were similar in chronic pouchitis and CDLC patients treated with biologics and those who were not. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory pouch conditions are common. Biologic use for chronic pouchitis and CDLC does not impact the rate of pouch failure.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Reservorios Cólicos/efectos adversos , Reservoritis/etiología , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reservoritis/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with ulcerative colitis are often young, and proctocolectomy with restorative ileo-pouch anal anastomosis is a crucial act that can improve or worsen the quality of the rest of their lives. The literature is scant on long-term functional outcomes after laparoscopy. The purpose of this study was to investigate results in terms of pouch function after standardized total laparoscopic technique compared with open intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. Cases were collected from the prospectively-maintained database of the Unit of General and Oncologic Surgery, XXX, Torino, Italy. Patients treated between May 2005 and May 2015 with three-stage laparoscopic or open proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch anal anastomosis were enrolled. The primary study endpoint was the percentage of well-functioning pouches. Secondary endpoints were postoperative early and late outcomes such as morbidity and pouch survival. RESULTS: Of the 78 patients identified, 48 underwent the open technique and 30 underwent laparoscopy. Median follow-up was 4 years. The overall complication rates were 19% and 13% (pâ¯=â¯0.5), and there were major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) in 14.6% and 13.3% of patients in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively (pâ¯=â¯0.8). Late complications occurred in 26 patients. Nine (18.8%) and 5 (16.7%) patients had pouchitis (pâ¯=â¯0.8), and 6 (12.5%) and 2 (6.7%) had cuffitis in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively (pâ¯=â¯0.70). Pouch failure occurred in 2 patients (4.2%) in the open group and 2 (6.7%) in the laparoscopic group. The pouch was observed to be functioning very well in 18 patients (37.5%) in the open group and in 17 patients (56%) in the laparoscopic group (pâ¯=â¯0.09). The study was limited by its retrospective, nonrandomized design. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated similar early and late results after total laparoscopic and open proctocolectomy, in particular concerning pouch function.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Reservorios Cólicos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No previous study describes the postoperative outcome and functional results after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), performed in ulcerative colitis by the same surgical team with the different anastomotic techniques adopted in a 27-year period. METHODS: Prospectively, consecutive 333 ulcerative colitis patients operated adopting different IPAA techniques during the open surgery period 1984-2011 were enrolled. IPAA was performed using single stapling (SS) technique in 38 patients, double stapling (DS) technique in 235 patients (TIA stapler 42 patients, Endo-GIA 131 patients, Contour 62 patients) and handsewn IPAA in 60 patients. RESULTS: Statistically different early and late complications were recorded among the different IPAA techniques. A lower frequency of daily and nocturnal defecations and a higher level of continence were observed in the DS-IPAA compared to handsewn IPAA. The distance between the anastomotic line and the anal verge was significantly lower in DS Endo-GIA or DS Contour groups than in the DS TIA and SS. In SS IPAA group, 31.6% developed cuffitis compared to 14.4% belonging to DS group, at a mean follow-up of 140.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Technical improvements changed the IPAA technique. Stapled IPAA is characterized by better functional outcome than handsewn IPAA. DS Endo-GIA and Contour IPAA are followed by lower risk of cuffitis.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Colitis Ulcerosa/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
La alternativa quirúrgica de elección para los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa (CU) refractaria al tratamiento médico es la proctocolectomía total con una reconstrucción a través de la confección de un reservorio ileal y una anastomosis ileo-anal. Esta cirugía permite la curación de la enfermedad con buen resultado funcional. A pesar de las demostradas ventajas, no está exenta de complicaciones. Una de las complicaciones es la inflamación sintomática del remanente rectal o cuffitis. Esta genera controversias importantes acerca de la técnica que debe utilizarse para la anastomosis ileo-anal debido a la asociación que presenta con la preservación de mucosa rectal en técnicas de sutura mecánica. El presente trabajo propone la revisión del tema y el análisis del enfoque actual de tratamiento, basada en un caso clínico.
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch is the treatment of choice in the majority of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to medical treatment. This surgery can cure the disease with good functional outcome. Despite the proven benefits, is not without complications. One of the complications is symptomatic inflammation of the rectal remnant or cuffitis. This generates significant controversy about the technique to be used for the Ileo-anal anastomosis because of the association presented to the preservation of rectal mucosa in mechanical suture techniques. This paper proposes the review of the topic and analysis of the current approach to treatment based on one case.