RESUMEN
Introduction: Oncoplastic surgery (OS) has expanded the indications for breast-conserving surgery associated with an adequate aesthetic result. However, few studies have described the factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes from this surgical modality. Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional prospective study that included patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without OS. The patients self-evaluated the cosmetic results of the breasts posttreatment and had them photographed. The photos were analyzed by BCCT.core. Individual and treatment factors (local and systemic) for all patients were evaluated. These factors were dichotomized according to the use of OS and to the cosmetic result (satisfactory and unsatisfactory). Categorical variables were tested for association with surgical outcome using the chi-square test while numerical variables using the Mann-Whitney U test. Variables with p <0,2 were selected for multivariate analysis. Results: Of the 300 patients evaluated, 72 (24,0%) underwent OS. According to the patient self-evaluations, an unsatisfactory cosmetic result from OS was significantly associated with younger age at diagnosis, higher body mass index (BMI) at the time of evaluation, larger tumor size and greater weight of the surgical specimen. According to the BCCT.core, only the laterality of the tumor (left) was significantly associated with an unsatisfactory cosmetic result. In logistic regression, considering OS as a control variable, the risk of an unsatisfactory outcome according to patient self-evaluation was related to the tumor ≥ T2 odds ratio (OR) 1,85 (1,027-3,34) and age at diagnosis < 40 [OR 5,0 (1,84-13,95)]. However, according to the software, the variables were associated with an increased risk of an unsatisfactory outcome were the time interval between surgery and evaluation [OR 1,27 (1,16-1,39)], the presence of lymphedema [OR 2,97 (1,36-6,46)], surgical wound infection [OR 3,6 (1,22-11,16)], tumor location on the left side [OR 3,06 (1,69-5,53)], overweight [OR 2,93 (1,48-5,8)] and obesity [OR 2,52 (1,2-5,31)]. Conclusion: There is no standard methodology for breast cosmesis evaluation, which influences the factors associated with unsatisfactory results. Younger patients and those with increased BMI, left breast cancer and extensive resections tend to present with unsatisfactory cosmetic results when OS is performed.
RESUMEN
Introducción: la úlcera venosa es la heridade origen vascular que más se presentaen la población adulta; afecta la calidad de vida,por loque se requiereun abordajeinterdisciplinarioparala atenciónde las personas que la padecen. Objetivo:describir las variables clínicas y sociales que interfieren en la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud de un grupo deadultosconúlcera venosa.Métodos:estudio observacional de tipo cohorte; incluyó 80 personas evaluadas en tres clínicas de Medellín(Colombia), en quienes seaplicó elinstrumento de evaluaciónCharing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire. Se describieron las variablessociodemográficas y la evolución de la calidad de vidahasta la cicatrización y se construyó un modelo de regresión logística para explicar las variables asociadas a tener lapeorcalidad de vida. Resultados:el 28,8%de los participantes obtuvieron 64 o más puntos, es decir, grado de afección alto durantela primera mediciónde la calidad de vida;en el 68,8%el puntaje fue63o menos, lo que significó afecciónmoderadaysolo el 2,4%tuvo baja afección.Laspeores puntuaciones se registraron enmujeres,participantes de mayor edad y quienes tenían mayor compromiso de la herida; la afección involucró las dimensiones Estado emocional, Estética, Función social y Actividades domésticas,aunque hubo evolución favorablede la calidad de vidamientrasiba cicatrizandola úlcera. Conclusiones:lacalidad de vida relacionada con la saludestá altamente afectada en las personasque tienen úlcera venosa, siendo más frecuente en quienes tienen dolor constante,heridas más grandes, de mayor tiempo de antigüedad y aquellos con mala percepción desusalud; por tanto,se requiere oportunamentela intervención profesional e interdisciplinaria en salud para el logro de la cicatrizacióny del bienestary para mejorar la calidad de vida.
ntroduction: Venous ulcers are the most common vascular injury in the adult population. They affect the quality of life, so people who suffer from venous ulcers require an interdisciplinary approach to their care. Objective: To describe clinical and social variables that affect the health-related quality of life of a group of adults with venous ulcers. Methods: Observational cohort study carried out with 80 people examined in three medical centers in Medellín (Colombia) and who were given the Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire to answer. Sociodemographic variables and the quality-of-life evolution until scarring were described. A logistic regression model was built to explain the variables associated with having the poorest quality of life. Results:There were28.8% of the participants who scored 64 or more points on the first quality of life measurement, which indicates a highly affected quality of life; 68.8% scored 63 or less, indicating a moderately affected quality of life, while only 2.4% indicated a slightly affected quality of life. The worst scores were seen among women, older participants, and those with greater ulcer severity. The dimensions of emotional status, cosmesis, social interaction, and domestic activities were affected, although there was a favorable evolution of the quality of life while the ulcer was healing. Conclusions: Health-related quality of life is highly affected in people with venous ulcers and is more common in those with constant pain, larger and older sores, and those with poor health perceptions. Therefore, timely professional and interdisciplinary healthcare interventions are required to achieve wound healing and wellness and improve quality of life
Introdução:a úlcera venosa é a ferida de origem vascular que ocorre mais frequentemente na população adulta e afeta a qualidade de vida, por isso é necessária uma abordagem interdisciplinar para o cuidado das pessoas que a sofrem. Objetivo:descrever as variáveis clínicas e sociais que interferem na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde de um grupo de adultos com úlcera venosa.Métodos:estudo de coorte observacional; incluíram-se 80 pessoas avaliadas em três clínicas em Medellín (Colômbia), nas quais foi aplicado o instrumento de avaliação Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire. Descreveram-se as variáveis sociodemográficas e a evolução da qualidade de vida até a cicatrizaçãoe construiu-se um modelo de regressão logística para explicar as variáveis associadas à pior qualidade de vida.Resultados: 28,8% dos participantes obtiveram 64 ou mais pontos, ou seja, alto grau de condição na primeira mensuração da qualidade de vida; em 68,8% a pontuação foi de 63 ou menos, o que significa condição moderada e apenas 2,4% em condição baixa. As piores pontuações foram registradas em mulheres, participantes mais velhos e naqueles com maior complicação da ferida; a afecção,envolvia as dimensões Estado Emocional, Estética, Função Social e Atividades Domésticas, embora houvesse evolução favorável da qualidade de vida enquanto a úlcera cicatrizava. Conclusões:a qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde é altamente afetada em pessoas com úlcera venosa, sendo mais frequente naquelas com dor constante, feridasmaiores, mais antigas e com má percepção de saúde; portanto, é necessária intervenção oportuna profissional e interdisciplinar em saúde para alcançar a cicatrização e o bem-estar e melhorar a qualidade de vida
RESUMEN
AIM: To analyse the overall cosmetic outcome according to patient self-assessment in relation to the fractionation received. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire, drawn up on the basis of subjective rating scales of cosmesis and of acute and late toxicity RTOG/EORTC, EORTC QLQ-C30 (v3) and LENT SOMA, was applied to patients with early-stage breast cancer who received radiotherapy with tangential fields between June 2014 and July 2015. Self-perception of cosmesis, changes in the treated breast, pain and fractionation used (hypofractionation (HF) 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions or conventional fractionation (CF) 50 Gy in 25 fractions) were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-two questionnaires were obtained. The median age was 58 years. 45% of patients reported 'excellent' cosmesis, 53% 'good', and 2% 'poor' cosmesis. Cosmesis was considered 'excellent/good' by 98% of patients. No statistically significant difference was found in overall cosmesis according to fractionation received (p = 0.6).The most frequent alteration was 'difference between both breasts' (77%), and 48% reported change in normal breast colour.Fifteen percent of patients who are younger than 58 years reported a change of normal breast colour affecting cosmesis compared to 9% of patients older than 58 years (p = 0.04).Complications affecting breast cosmesis were reported by 9% of patients with stages I-II compared with 2% with cancer in situ (DCIS) (p = 0.04); 14% in stages I-II referred colour change affecting cosmesis compared to 6% of those with DCIS (p = 0.03).Ninety-four percent of patients stated that they would accept treatment again. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in cosmetic results was found between HF and CF in our patients. Great satisfaction regarding cosmetic outcome of cancer treatment was reported, given by 98% of excellent/good cosmesis, and 94% of patients who would receive treatment again.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of hypofractionated boost after hypofractionated whole breast irradiation in breast carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients after breast conservative surgery were treated all time with hypofractionation of 2.67 Gy/day. Whole breast dose was 40.05 Gy followed in case of risk of local relapse by a boost of 16.02 Gy or 8.01 Gy. Acute and chronic toxicity results were evaluated including cosmetic software-assisted assessment and objective evaluation of fibrosis parameters (elasticity and hydration) by means of a skin tester. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were evaluated. Acute toxicities comprised grade 1 dermatitis in 48.1 %, grade 2 in 44.5 % and grade 3 in 17 patients 4.7 %, respectively. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, in 308 cases (86.6 %) there was no chronic skin or subcutaneous changes. In the first consecutive 50 patients, measures with skin tester showed no statistical differences in parameters for skin and subcutaneous fibrosis. Cosmetic results were considered excellent and good in 26 and 62 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Boost to tumour bed with hypofractionated doses is well tolerated and acute and chronic toxicities are mild with good cosmetic results. Objective systems are encouraging methods to assess skin quality and cosmesis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Lobular/radioterapia , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Lobular/patología , Enfermedad Crónica , Técnicas Cosméticas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Enfermedades de la Piel/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) research has been limited. The aim of this study is to describe our technique and to evaluate the short term outcomes and efficacy of SILS Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in a selected group of patients in a single center. METHODS: From March 2012 to January 2013, a total of fourteen patients underwent SILS RYGB using a single vertical 2.5-3 cm intra-umbilical incision, 3-ports placed trans-fascially, and a liver suspension technique in Cleveland Clinic's Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, in Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Patient selection, short-term outcomes and technical issues were retrospectively viewed in this study. RESULTS: A total of 14 morbid obese patients (12 women and 2 men; mean age, 46 years). Mean operative time was 196 (range 131-265) min. Mean weight at surgery was 113 (range 91-135) kg. One patient required placement of one additional port (7 %). No conversions to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) or open surgery was needed. The estimated blood loss was 40 (range 20-100) ml. In terms of pain control, the frequency of patient controlled analgesia had a mean use of 21 times in postoperative day 0 (POD), 37 times in POD1 and 13 times in POD2. Pain score (assessed by visual analogue scale) had a median score of 6.9 in POD0, 5.2 In POD1 and 3.8 in POD2. Weight loss was approximately 7.25 lb. (±4.5) after first postoperative visit, 28.9 lb. (±11.86) after 1 month and 45.4 lb. (±15.4) after 4 months. No patients required re-operation or readmission during the 90 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: Single incision is feasible, safe and reproducible technique used as an access to complex surgeries like gastric bypass in carefully selected patients. Results in short-term outcomes are comparable to those observed in literature. Some potential benefits include less postoperative pain, improved cosmesis, and patient satisfaction. Randomized trials involving larger patient series with a longer follow-up and larger cohort studies and/or systematic reviews will be necessary to assess the extent of the benefits and limitations of SILS in bariatric surgery.