RESUMEN
Chromosomal abnormalities on the short arm of chromosome 2 in the region p11.2 have been associated with developmental delay, intellectual disability, facial anomalies, abnormal ears, skeletal and genital malformations. Here we describe a patient with a de novo interstitial heterozygous microdeletion on the short arm of chromosome 2 in the region p11.2-p12. He presents with facial dysmorphism characterized by a broad and low root of the nose and low-set protruding ears. Clinical examinations during follow-up visits revealed congenital pendular nystagmus, decreased visual acuity and psychomotor development disorder including intellectual disability. The heterozygous 5 Mb-microdeletion was characterized by an array CGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridization) analysis. In the past two decades, nine patients with microdeletions in this region have been identified by array CGH analysis and were reported in the literature. All these patients show psychomotor development disorder and outer and/or inner ear anomalies. In addition, most of the patients have mild to severe intellectual disability and show facial malformations. We reviewed the literature on PubMed and OMIM using the gene/loci names as search terms in an attempt to identify correlations between genes located within the heterozygous microdeletion and the clinical phenotype of the patient, in order to define a recognizable phenotype for the 2p11.2p12 microdeletion syndrome. We discuss additional symptoms that are not systematically present in all patients and contribute to a heterogeneous clinical presentation of this microdeletion syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Discapacidad Intelectual , Masculino , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/genética , Discapacidad Intelectual/diagnóstico , Deleción Cromosómica , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Fenotipo , GenotipoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Ear molding is a safe, non-surgical approach to treat newborns with congenital ear anomalies. In this study, we aimed to investigate long-term aesthetic outcomes and caretaker satisfaction from ear molding therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 2018 to 2020 was conducted for infants who underwent ear molding treatment at our institution. Patient demographics and treatment related variables were collected. Caretakers were surveyed regarding their experience, expectations, and aesthetic outcome at 1 year (short-term) and 3 years (long-term) from treatment. Independent physicians evaluated treatment efficacy. Responses were converted to a Likert scale (1-5), with 5 representing most desirable. RESULTS: Overall, 38 of 42 patients participated in our long-term study (90%) for a total of 62 ears. Average follow-up was 3.31 ± 0.50 years after completion of treatment. Mean age at treatment was 23.2 ± 19.7 days with a mean treatment duration of 21.7 ± 7.7 days. Caretakers' satisfaction regarding auricular appearance remained high (short-term: 4.18 vs. long-term: 4.17, p = 0.54) and anticipated social distress decreased over time. Physician aesthetic evaluations were favorable between "somewhat effective" and "very effective" and remained consistent over time (short term: 3.46 vs. long-term: 3.31, p = 0.31). Furthermore, physician evaluations were higher for deformations than malformations (p = 0.04) and in children who began treatment by 30 days old (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Caretaker satisfaction from ear molding therapy remained high after long-term follow up, and social distress from the perception of their child's ears decreased with time. Physician aesthetic ratings confirmed efficacy, with better outcomes seen in deformations than in malformations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aim to analyze audiometric outcomes of middle ear surgery in patients with congenital middle ear anomalies. METHODS: In this single center retrospective cohort study, audiological outcomes were extracted from patient files. Patients with a congenital middle ear anomaly treated surgically in a tertiary referral center between June 2015 and December 2020 were included. Pre- and postoperative short- and long-term audiometric data (at ≥3 and ≥10 months respectively) were compared to analyze hearing outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen ears (15 patients) were treated surgically with an exploratory tympanotomy. At short term follow up statistically significant improvements in air conduction thresholds and air-bone gaps were found. Hearing improved in 94.4% (17/18) of operated ears. Successful outcome, defined as an air-bone gap closure to within 20 dB after surgery, was reached in 44.4% (8/18). Serviceable hearing (air conduction ≤30 dB) was reached in 55.6% (10/18). Negative outcome (any significant deterioration in hearing) occurred in 1 patient: in this ear otitis media occurred during the postoperative course. At long term follow up, available for 50% of the cohort, hearing remained stable in 5 ears, improved in 1 ear and deteriorated in 3, all of which underwent revision surgery. Sensorineural hearing loss due to surgery, or other complications, were not encountered. CONCLUSION: middle ear surgery was found to be an effective treatment option to improve hearing in this cohort of patients with congenital middle ear anomalies. Surgical goals of obtained gain in air conduction thresholds and serviceable hearing levels were met by most patients without the occurrence of any iatrogenic sensorineural hearing loss.
Asunto(s)
Osículos del Oído/anomalías , Osículos del Oído/cirugía , Pérdida Auditiva/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otológicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Audiometría , Niño , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Describe anatomical and radiological findings in 742 patients evaluated for congenital aural atresia and microtia by a multidisciplinary team. Develop a new classification method to enhance multidisciplinary communication regarding patients with congenital aural atresia and microtia. METHODS: Retrospective chart review with descriptive analysis of findings arising from the evaluation of patients with congenital atresia and microtia between January 2008 and January 2012 at a multidisciplinary tertiary referral center. RESULTS: We developed a classification method based on the acronym HEAR MAPS (Hearing, Ear [microtia], Atresia grade, Remnant earlobe, Mandible development, Asymmetry of soft tissue, Paralysis of the facial nerve and Syndromes). We used this method to evaluate 742 consecutive congenital atresia and microtia patients between 2008 and January of 2012. Grade 3 microtia was the most common external ear malformation (76%). Pre-operative Jahrsdoerfer scale was 9 (19%), 8 (39%), 7 (19%), and 6 or less (22%). Twenty three percent of patients had varying degrees of hypoplasia of the mandible. Less than 10% of patients had an identified associated syndrome. CONCLUSION: Patients with congenital aural atresia and microtia often require the intervention of audiology, otology, plastic surgery, craniofacial surgery and speech and language professionals to achieve optimal functional and esthetic reconstruction. Good communication between these disciplines is essential for coordination of care. We describe our use of a new classification method that efficiently describes the physical and radiologic findings in microtia/atresia patients to improve communication amongst care providers.