RESUMEN

Paratuberculosis (PTB) and tuberculosis (TB) are two mycobacterial diseases with a severe economic and health impact on domestic ruminants. The ante mortem diagnosis of PTB is hampered, among other factors, by the limited sensitivity of all the available diagnostic techniques. Since TB-infected goats subjected to the comparative intradermal tuberculin test (CITT) may experience a booster effect on their antibody titer and a potential enhancement to the sensitivity of humoral techniques for tuberculosis, in the present study we aimed to evaluate this diagnostic strategy on the humoral diagnosis of PTB in serum and milk samples collected from a caprine herd that was TB free and PTB infected. The results from 120 goats indicated a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the quantitative response detected using an ELISA technique, conducted using serum and milk samples taken 15 and 30 days after performing a CITT (day 0 of the study); although, it did not translate into a significant increase in the number of reactors during any of the testing events (0, 3,15, 30 and 60 days post-CITT). Additionally, the number of ELISA-positive animals was higher for the serum versus the milk samples at both 15 and 30 days post-CITT. The increase in the quantitative ELISA result suggested a diagnostic strategy that maximizes ELISA sensitivity, mainly using serum samples, in PTB-infected herds; although, it may depend on individual differences and the interpretation criteria.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is infectious chronic disease of animals mainly caused by bacillus Mycobacterium bovis. It is known endemic disease of cattle in Ethiopia. In the current study sites, there is little information on bovine tuberculosis. Thus, this study was aimed to assess public awareness; and estimate prevalence and potential a risk factors of bovine tuberculosis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, November 2018 to May 2019, on dairy cattle randomly selected from smallholder farms of Arba Minch Zuria and Chencha districts. Comparative intradermal tuberculin test (CIDT) was used in the diagnosis of bTB in dairy animals. CIDT was administered to 221 dairy cattle. Questionnaire survey was performed on 110 smallholders to assess risk factors accountable for the event of bTB in human population. Results: 8.2% animal level prevalence of bTB was documented in the study sites. Dairy cattle with age of 4 to 8 eight years were 34% more likely to be affected by bTB less than 4 years age cattle (OR=1.34). However, factors like housing, body condition, herd size and parity were not significantly related with the event of bTB. The assessment of bTB awareness was shown 29.7% participants knew that cattle could be infected, and 13.4% of the respondents believed that it can spread from animal to human and vice versa. Besides, 66.1% of participants had habit for consumption of raw milk and soured milk products. Moreover, respondent's attitude about zoonoses and consequences of bTB was risky. Conclusion: Present study discloses that bTB is animal health problem affecting dairy cattle in Gamo zone, Southern Ethiopia. Based on the current findings, public awareness creation, bovine tuberculosis test and segregation strategy should be applied to minimize the public health hazards and risk factors for bovine origin tuberculosis.

RESUMEN

The National Bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) Eradication Program for dairy cattle has been operating in Taiwan for many years and has allowed the prevalence of bTB to decrease gradually. However, 29% of intradermal tuberculin test (ITT)-positive dairy cows were later found to be TB negative based on necropsy, histopathological examination, and mycobacterial isolation results. Studies in Taiwan have indicated that Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) may lead to false-positive ITT. Due to the high prevalence (over 90%) of paratuberculosis (PTB) serum antibody among Taiwan's farms, comparative ITT (CITT) has been recommended to differentiate between bTB and PTB infections. In this study, we used ITT, CITT, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to evaluate the prevalence of bTB from 2012 to 2018. We also used pathological and bacterial examination from ITT-positive dairy cows to evaluate CITT's diagnostic ability and adjust its cutoff point accordingly. After careful selection, 36 cows (including 31 cows from 11 ITT-positive farms and 5 from 2 ITT-negative farms) were examined by CITT. The cutoff point was adjusted using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Overall, our results identified the ITT-positive prevalence in Taiwan as 0.03-0.22%, and PTB-positive prevalence as 54.55-73.53%. The results of sensitivity, specificity, kappa, and ROC analyses have identified the optimal cutoff point for the CITT in Taiwan as ≥ 3 mm. At this cutoff point value, the sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 96.43%, respectively. Our findings can be used to reduce the false-positive response rate caused by PTB cross-reaction and accelerate the eradication of bTB in Taiwan.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a chronic bacterial disease of cattle caused by Mycobacterium bovis. bTB causes severe economic losses resulting from livestock deaths, chronic disease, and trade restrictions. Determination of serum levels of adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme produced by monocytes/macrophages and lymphocytes, has been used in the diagnosis of human TB. This study aimed to evaluate the role of ADA enzyme activity in the diagnosis of bTB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, a total of 100 animals (cattle and buffaloes) were screened for bTB by comparative intradermal tuberculin test (CITT) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) test and in serum samples obtained from 100 screened animals, ADA seric activity was evaluated using ADA-MTB kit procured from Tulip Diagnostics. RESULTS: A total of 18 animals were positive TB reactors by CITT, 8 were positive by IFN-γ, and 4 animals were positive by both CITT and IFN-γ. The average ADA value of bTB-positive animals either by CITT, IFN-γ, or both CITT and IFN-γ was 12.55 U/L, 14.8 U/L, and 18.36 U/L, respectively, in CID negative, it was 10.57 U/L and in IFN-γ negative, it was 10.59 U/L. CONCLUSION: The average ADA value of bTB-positive animals positive either by CITT, IFN-γ, or both CITT and IFN-γ was more than the average ADA value in animals negative for bTB by either of the tests.

RESUMEN

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) control programs generally rely on intradermal tuberculin tests for the antemortem diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle, but these tests detect only a portion of the infected animals. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic coverage of a combination of the bTB antemortem techniques known as the comparative intradermal tuberculin test (CITT) and an ELISA based on a recombinant chimera of ESAT-6/MPB70/MPB83 as the antigen in cattle. The results were compared to postmortem findings based on M. bovis culturing and PCR. Paired comparisons of all data (n=92) demonstrated that ELISA and LST results compared to the culturing results did not present significant differences (P=0.27 on McNemar's test and P=0.12 on Fisher's exact test, respectively). Using culturing as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 79.5% (95% CI: 64.5-89.2%) and 75.5% (95% CI: 62.4-85.1%), respectively, whereas LST demonstrated 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 91.03-100%) and 92.5% specificity (95% CI: 82.1-97.0%). The ELISA results did not reveal significant differences in relation to the LST results (P>0.99 on Fisher's exact test). Using the latter as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 79.1% (95% CI: 64.8-88.6%) and 79.6% (95% CI: 66.4-88.5%), respectively. The use of ELISA with the recombinant chimera of ESAT-6/MPB70/MPB83 as the antigen complements the diagnostic coverage provided by CITT and increases the removal of infected animals from herds.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) infection in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer) relies on detection of the cell-mediated immune response to M. bovis antigens using the single comparative intradermal tuberculin test (SCITT) or interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs). The aim of the present study was to determine whether parallel testing with the SCITT and an IGRA increases the number of M. bovis-infected buffaloes detected by these assays. Culture-confirmed animals (n = 71) tested during routine bovine tuberculosis (bTB) control programmes in Hluhluwe iMfolozi Park and Madikwe Game Reserve in South Africa, were used in this study. Results from 35 buffaloes tested using the SCITT and three Bovigam® IGRAs (cohort A) and 36 buffaloes tested using the SCITT, standard Bovigam® IGRA and Qiagen Cattletype IGRA (cohort B) were analysed. The parallel use of the SCITT with selected IGRAs was able to identify all animals in both cohorts. These findings are in agreement with cattle studies supporting the use of the SCITT and IGRAs in parallel to identify the greatest number of M. bovis-infected animals. The suggested parallel testing algorithm should be strategically applied to maximize detection of M. bovis infection in bTB-positive buffalo herds.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

According to the Brazilian National Program for the Control and Eradication of Animal Brucellosis and Tuberculosis (PNCEBT), the routine tests for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in the country are the simple intradermal tuberculin test (SITT) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA), the caudal fold test and the comparative intradermal tuberculin test (CITT). The latter is also used as a confirmatory test. A group of 53 animals from three dairy herds in a focal area for bovine tuberculosis, that were submitted to depopulation in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, were submitted to the CITT. Tissues were cultured and the resulting colonies were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. Among the 53 animals analyzed using the CITT, 32 (60.4%) were negative, 14 (26.4%) were positive and seven (13.2%) results were inconclusive. The CITT detected 11 of the 39 animals with culture-confirmed M. bovis infection as positive. Among the total of 14 uninfected animals based on cultures, the CBT detected eight as negative. Thus, the CITT demonstrated sensitivity of 28.2% and specificity of 57.1% for the population sampled. A total of 24/32 (75.0%) of the animals with negative CITT results were culture positive (confirmed by PCR) and were considered false negatives based on the CITT. The maintenance of these false-negative animals in herds has serious implications for the control of the disease, since they can be a source of infection. The addition of complementary tests could help identify such animals and increase the odds of diagnostic success.(AU)

No Brasil, segundo o Programa Nacional de Controle e Erradicação da Brucelose e Tuberculose Animal (PNCEBT), do Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA), os testes de rotina para o diagnóstico de tuberculose bovina são o teste cervical simples (TCC), o teste da prega caudal (TPC) e o teste cervical comparativo (TCC), sendo que o último também é utilizado como teste confirmatório. Um grupo de 53 animais oriundos de três rebanhos leiteiros de área de foco para tuberculose bovina que foram submetidos a vazio sanitário no Rio Grande do Sul foi submetido ao TCC. Os tecidos destes animais foram cultivados e as colônias resultantes confirmadas por PCR e sequenciamento de DNA. Dos 53 animais analisados no TCC, 32 (60,4%) foram negativos, 14 (26,4%) positivos e sete (13,2%) inconclusivos, com base no PNCEBT. O TCC detectou como positivos 11 dos 39 animais com infecção por M. bovis confirmada por cultivo. Do total de 14 animais não infectados, baseado na cultura, o TCC detectou oito como negativos. Assim, o TCC apresentou, para a população amostrada, sensibilidade de 28,2% e especificidade de 57,1%. Um total de 24/32 (75,0%) dos animais negativos ao TCC foi positivo no cultivo (confirmado por PCR), sendo considerados falso-negativos ao TCC. A manutenção destes animais falso-negativos nos rebanhos tem sérias implicações para o controle da enfermidade, já que os mesmos podem ser fonte de infecção. A adição de testes complementares poderia auxiliar na identificação destes animais, aumentando a cobertura diagnóstica.(AU)

Asunto(s)