RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine is a feasible alternative to in-person evaluations for people with opioid use disorder (OUD). The literature on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) telemedicine has focused on ongoing OUD treatment. Emergency department (ED) visits are an opportunity to initiate MOUD; however, little is known regarding the outcomes of patients following telemedicine referrals for MOUD from emergency settings. The current study describes rates of initial outpatient clinic appointment attendance and 30-day retention in care among patients referred by telemedicine compared to ED referrals. METHODS: This paper reports a retrospective review of data for patients referred from EDs or telemedicine through the Medication for Addiction Treatment and Electronic Referrals (MATTERS) Network. The MATTERS online platform collects data on patient demographic information (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, and insurance type), reason for visit, prior medical and mental health history, prior OUD treatment history, and past 30-day substance use behaviors. Analyses compared initial visit attendance and 30-day retention among the patients for whom follow-up data were received from clinics by demographic and initial treatment factors. RESULTS: Between October 2020 and September 2022, the MATTERS Network made 1349 referrals; 39.7 % originated from an ED and 47.8 % originated from telemedicine. For patients with available data, those referred from telemedicine were 1.64 times more likely to attend their initial clinic appointment and 2.59 times more likely be engaged in treatment at 30 days compared to those referred from an ED. More than two-thirds of patients referred from the emergency telemedicine environment followed up at their first clinic visit and more than half of these patients were still retained in treatment 30 days after referral. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of initial clinic visit and 30-day retention when referred following a telemedicine evaluation are encouraging. Further development of telemedicine programs that offer evaluations, access to medications, and referrals to treatment should be considered.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aim: To evaluate our early discharge program of preterm infants with nasogastric tube feeding (NTF) and close outpatient clinic follow-up with regard to safety, parent satisfaction and parental stress level. Methods: 119 preterm infants were discharged on NTF from our tertiary care neonatal unit (median gestational age 31.0 weeks, median birthweight 1,650 g). Parental satisfaction was evaluated by a standardized questionnaire. For safety assessment growth until term equivalent age and re-hospitalizations within 2 months after discharge were evaluated. Results: Infants were discharged home at a median gestational age of 35.4 weeks after a median hospital stay of 22 days. Follow up was attained in 95 of 104 parent-infant dyads. The majority of parents (94%) reported that they had made the right decision in taking their infant home on NTF. At the time of discharge 86% of parents felt very well-prepared to perform NTF. 70% Of parents rated their stress level at home as low (≤2 out of 5). There were no NTF associated readmissions and no growth faltering until term equivalent age. Conclusion: Early discharge of preterm infants with NTF together with outpatient clinic follow-up is very well-accepted by parents and appears to be safe.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The clinical and economical value of routine submission of hernia sacs for pathological examination and scheduled clinic follow-ups after inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair has been questioned. Herein, we assessed the institutional variability in these routine practices. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia and/or hydrocele repair, open or laparoscopically, at our institution from 2015 to 2018. RESULTS: 1181 patients were included (1074 inguinal hernias and 157 hydroceles). Of 531 specimens obtained from 446 (38%) patients, 515 (97%) were normal. 16 (3%) abnormal pathological findings included 7 with mesothelial hyperplasia, 5 with nonfunctional genital ductal remnants, 3 with ectopic adrenal cortical tissues, and 1 epidydimal structure which was not recognized at the time of surgery. 418 (35%) patients had scheduled clinic follow-ups 65 (IQR 46-94) days postoperatively. 44 (4%) patients with unexpected postoperative Emergency Department visits within 30 days of surgery were identified. Only one patient required inpatient treatment, and the rest did not require intervention or admission. The total direct cost of analyzing specimens during the study period was $30,798 CAD ($10,266/year). The average cost to detect a potentially significant finding was $1924.88/specimen and $2053.20/patient. CONCLUSIONS: Routine pathological examination of hernia sacs and scheduled clinic follow-ups were associated with significant costs and predominantly nonsignificant findings. They should therefore be reserved for patients with a high clinical suspicion of injuries/abnormalities or risk factors for potential complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a level III evidence study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The current study aims to identify the rates of lapses in care and loss to follow-up before age one through age five for white and nonwhite congenital heart disease (CHD) survivors. Nonwhite CHD survivors were hypothesized to experience an earlier lapse in care and be lost to follow-up than whites. DESIGN: Patients were from a large pediatric hospital and had (1) at least one outpatient cardiology clinic visit or cardiac surgery visit before the age of one and (2) a diagnosis of moderate or complex structural CHD. Cardiology outpatient utilization rates were tracked from before age one through age five. Lapse in follow-up was defined as not having at least one outpatient cardiology visit per year, and loss to follow-up was not returning after a lapse in care by age five. Race was categorized as white and nonwhite. Covariates included sex, insurance type, noncardiology inpatient and outpatient hospital utilization, and CHD severity. RESULTS: The sample included 1034 patients. Overall, 75.7% experienced a lapse in care with only 41.6% of those returning by age five. Nonwhites experienced lapses in care at younger ages than whites. Nonwhites had a 53% increased risk of lapse in care. Medicaid patients and those with moderate CHD diagnoses also had an increased risk for lapse in care. CONCLUSIONS: Lapse in care appears prevalent among CHD survivors by age five, with nonwhites demonstrating elevated risk. Future multisite prospective studies should include the assessment of parental knowledge, barriers to accessing care, and satisfaction with care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mammaplasty in gender reassignment surgery is often poorly understood, due to a lack of information about this condition and its therapy. The aim of this work was to evaluate patient satisfaction following bilateral mastectomy for female-to-male gender reassignment. METHODS: We contacted 22 patients who underwent mammaplasty for female-to-male gender reassignment between January 2012 and March 2013 in our university hospital. Patients were sent postal questionnaires. A modified Q-breast questionnaire adapted for gender reassignment surgery enabled us to objectively evaluate patient aesthetic and psychological satisfaction. An overall score superior to 320 was considered as very satisfied for the patient. RESULTS: A total of 73% of the patients answered the questionnaire. The mean score was 332/378. This score corresponded to "very satisfied" on our questionnaire. The psychological score was 54.5/60. CONCLUSION: This study showed that a real benefit was obtained in terms of patient quality of life and self-confidence. The high level of patient satisfaction confirmed that gender reassignment mastectomy is a useful and valid procedure, which enables these patients to reclaim their place in society. It can only be considered if it is within the framework of structures that ensure comprehensive and pluridisciplinary treatment for the patient.

Asunto(s)