RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maximal skin testing (ST) nonirritant concentrations (NICs) are consistent for penicillin and aminopenicillin among guidelines. However, there is variability among guidelines for maximal ST NICs of cephalosporins. OBJECTIVE: To determine maximal immediate and delayed ST NICs of 15 ß-lactams in ß-lactam-tolerant and ß-lactam-naïve participants. METHODS: We performed a single-center, nonrandomized prospective study between September 2019 and January 2022 in adult participants. Participants received skin prick testing (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT) injections at 6 increasing concentrations of 1 or more ß-lactams. A concentration was considered irritant when more than 5% of participants had a positive test. A positive test was defined as a wheal ≥3 mm compared with negative control accompanied by a ≥5 mm flare for SPT/IDT and induration ≥5 mm with associated erythema at 48 hours for delayed readings (dIDT). Sensitivity analyses using 3 alternative IDT positive criteria were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 747 participants with a median age of 64 (interquartile range: 54-72) years (52% male, 85% White, and 92% non-Hispanic) underwent 20,858 skin tests. All undiluted SPT concentrations were nonirritant. We found the following maximal IDT/dIDT NICs (mg/mL): ampicillin (41.6/125), ampicillin-sulbactam (93.8/187.5), aztreonam (6.3/25), cefazolin (55/165), cefepime (35/140), cefoxitin (45/90), ceftaroline (7.5/15), ceftriaxone (58.3/175), cefuroxime (55/110), ertapenem (16.6/50), imipenem-cilastin (6.3/25), meropenem (8.3/25), nafcillin (31.3/62.5), oxacillin (20.9/83.5), and piperacillin-tazobactam (112.5/225). dIDTs were almost all completely nonirritant close to or at undiluted concentrations. There were no differences when we applied 3 IDT positivity criteria to our raw data. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SPTs with undiluted stock ß-lactam antibiotic concentrations are nonirritant. Compared with previously published nonirritant concentrations, we propose a 2- to 50-fold increase to the maximal IDT and dIDT NICs of 15 ß-lactam antibiotics. When performing dIDTs, a higher concentration should be used rather than the same IDT concentration.
RESUMEN
Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare but significant adverse effect of certain medications, with the potential for severe bleeding, thrombosis, and death. This report discusses a rare case of severe thrombocytopenia induced by ceftaroline in a 69-year-old male with a history of atrial fibrillation on rivaroxaban and allergies to amoxicillin and sulfa drugs. Following the initiation of ceftaroline for left lower extremity purulent cellulitis, his platelet count dropped from 204,000 to 4,000 x 10³/µL within a day. Given the low platelet levels, anticoagulation therapy, and bleeding risk, immediate interventions and prompt recognition prevented major complications, highlighting the importance of recognizing drug-induced thrombocytopenia in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a serious clinical challenge with high mortality rates. Antibiotic combination therapy is currently used in cases of persistent infection; however, the limited development of new antibiotics will likely increase the need for combination therapy, and better methods are needed for identifying effective combinations for treating persistent bacteremia. To identify pairwise combinations with the most consistent potential for benefit compared to monotherapy with a primary anti-MRSA agent, we conducted a systematic study with an in vitro high-throughput methodology. We tested daptomycin and vancomycin each in combination with gentamicin, rifampicin, cefazolin, and oxacillin, and ceftaroline with daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampicin. Combining cefazolin with daptomycin lowered the daptomycin concentration required to reach 95% growth inhibition (IC95) for all isolates tested and lowered daptomycin IC95 below the sensitivity breakpoint for five out of six isolates that had daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations at or above the sensitivity breakpoint. Similarly, vancomycin IC95s were decreased when vancomycin was combined with cefazolin for 86.7% of the isolates tested. This was a higher percentage than was achieved by adding any other secondary antibiotic to vancomycin. Adding rifampicin to daptomycin or vancomycin did not always reduce IC95s and failed to produce synergistic interaction in any of the isolates tested; the addition of rifampicin to ceftaroline was frequently synergistic and always lowered the amount of ceftaroline required to reach the IC95. These analyses rationalize further in vivo evaluation of three drug pairs for MRSA bacteremia: daptomycin+cefazolin, vancomycin+cefazolin, and ceftaroline+rifampicin.IMPORTANCEBloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have a high mortality rate despite the availability of vancomycin, daptomycin, and newer antibiotics including ceftaroline. With the slow output of the antibiotic pipeline and the serious clinical challenge posed by persistent MRSA infections, better strategies for utilizing combination therapy are becoming increasingly necessary. We demonstrated the value of a systematic high-throughput approach, adapted from prior work testing antibiotic combinations against tuberculosis and other mycobacteria, by using this approach to test antibiotic pairs against a panel of MRSA isolates with diverse patterns of antibiotic susceptibility. We identified three antibiotic pairs-daptomycin+cefazolin, vancomycin+cefazolin, and ceftaroline+rifampicin-where the addition of the second antibiotic improved the potency of the first antibiotic across all or most isolates tested. Our results indicate that these pairs warrant further evaluation in the clinical setting.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Daptomicina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Rifampin , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Vancomicina , beta-Lactamas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Daptomicina/farmacología , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Vancomicina/farmacología , beta-Lactamas/farmacología , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Rifampin/farmacología , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Ceftarolina , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Cefazolina/farmacología , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Oxacilina/farmacología , Gentamicinas/farmacología , Gentamicinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a serious clinical infection associated with a high risk of mortality. Dual therapy is often used in patients with persistent bacteremia. Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of vancomycin or daptomycin monotherapy with those of dual therapy with ceftaroline in high-grade or persistent MRSA bacteremia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a university teaching hospital between January 2014 and June 2021, involving adults initially treated with vancomycin or daptomycin. Patients were categorized into monotherapy and dual therapy groups. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included microbiological relapse and antibiotic-related adverse events. Results: In a group of 155 patients, 30-day mortality rates were similar between the monotherapy (23.4%) and dual therapy (22.6%) groups, with comparable microbiological relapse rates (6.5%). In inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, we found no significant association between dual therapy and mortality (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.38, 95% CI 0.64-2.41, P = 0.38) or microbiological relapse (ARR 0.95, 95% CI 0.31-2.73, P = 0.93). Dual therapy was associated with a lower risk of antibiotic-related adverse events (ARR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, P = 0.02). Infectious diseases (ID) consultation was associated with a reduced mortality risk (ARR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.95, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Dual therapy with ceftaroline did not reduce mortality risk compared with monotherapy in patients with MRSA bacteremia. However, patients with ID consultations showed a 73% reduction in mortality rates. Large-scale, prospective, and randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence regarding the potential benefits of dual therapy with ceftaroline for MRSA bacteremia.
RESUMEN
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is challenging to treat due to a lack of guidance for clinicians. The daptomycin and ceftaroline combination is promising for treating persistent MRSA bloodstream infections (BSIs). In this report, we present a case series of 7 patients who failed vancomycin and then were treated with daptomycin and ceftaroline for persistent MRSA BSIs. The median age (IQR) of the included patients was 59 (48-67), with 5 male and 2 female patients. Six patients (85.7%) had a clinical cure for their persistent BSIs. The median time (IQR) for sterilization of MRSA BSIs after initiation of daptomycin and ceftaroline combination was 2 days (1-3). Among the patients who had clinical cures, the median time for clinical cures (IQR) was 6 weeks (4.5-6 weeks). The combination of daptomycin and ceftaroline could be an excellent treatment option for persistent MRSA BSIs.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Monotherapy with vancomycin or daptomycin remains guideline-based care for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) despite concerns regarding efficacy. Limited data support potential benefit of combination therapy with ceftaroline as initial therapy. We present an assessment of outcomes of patients initiated on early combination therapy for MRSA-B. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients admitted with MRSA-B between July 1, 2017 and April 31, 2023. During this period, there was a change in institutional practice from routine administration of monotherapy to initial combination therapy for most patients with MRSA-B. Combination therapy included vancomycin or daptomycin plus ceftaroline within 72 hours of index blood culture and monotherapy was vancomycin or daptomycin alone. The primary outcome was a composite of persistent bacteremia, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 30-day bacteremia recurrence. Time to microbiological cure and safety outcomes were assessed. All outcomes were assessed using propensity score-weighted logistic regression. Results: Of 213 patients included, 118 received monotherapy (115 vancomycin, 3 daptomycin) and 95 received combination therapy with ceftaroline (76 vancomycin, 19 daptomycin). The mean time from MRSA-positive molecular diagnostic blood culture result to combination therapy was 12.1 hours. There was no difference between groups for the primary composite outcome (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.60, 4.18). Time to microbiological cure was longer with combination therapy (mean difference 1.50 days, 95% CI 0.60, 2.41). Adverse event rates were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Early initiation of ceftaroline-based combination therapy did not improve outcomes for patients with MRSA-B in comparison to monotherapy therapy.
RESUMEN
Background In complicated endovascular infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), when first-line therapy with vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) fails, combination therapy with ceftaroline (CFT) and DAP has been shown to be a useful approach as salvage therapy for persistent MRSA bacteremia. Objectives This study aimed to describe experience with daptomycin and ceftaroline combination therapy in MRSE-complicated endovascular infections. Methods A single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients with MRSE-complicated endovascular infections treated with ≥72 hours of DAP+CFT at any time during the course of treatment, from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020, at Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal, was conducted. The exclusion criteria were known resistance to daptomycin or ceftaroline, total time of combination therapy <72 hours and loss to follow-up. Results We identified seven cases that matched our criteria: five endocarditis and two central venous catheter infections. Six patients switched to combination therapy due to treatment failure with first-line agents - three due to persistent bacteremia and three due to progression of infection despite negative blood cultures. Effective surgical source control took one to four weeks to occur. Three patients died during the treatment, one from progression of the disease and two due to another infection. Conclusions We consider the DAP+CFT combination therapy to be a valid and safe therapeutic choice in complicated patients, such as those with severe infection, poor functional status, and impossibility or delay of surgical source control. However, conclusions on the role of combination therapy should be careful due to the low number of patients and the several confounding factors.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Predictions of antimicrobial effects typically rely on plasma-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets, ignoring target-site concentrations and potential differences in tissue penetration between antibiotics. In this study, we applied PK-PD modelling to compare target site-specific effects of antibiotics by integrating clinical microdialysis data, in vitro time-kill curves, and antimicrobial susceptibility distributions. As a case study, we compared the effect of lefamulin and ceftaroline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at soft-tissue concentrations. METHODS: A population PK model describing lefamulin concentrations in plasma, subcutaneous adipose and muscle tissue was developed. For ceftaroline, a similar previously reported PK model was adopted. In vitro time-kill experiments were performed with six MRSA isolates and a PD model was developed to describe bacterial growth and antimicrobial effects. The clinical PK and in vitro PD models were linked to compare antimicrobial effects of ceftaroline and lefamulin at the different target sites. RESULTS: Considering minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions and standard dosages, ceftaroline showed superior anti-MRSA effects compared to lefamulin both at plasma and soft-tissue concentrations. Looking at the individual antibiotics, lefamulin effects were highest at soft-tissue concentrations, while ceftaroline effects were highest at plasma concentrations, emphasising the importance of considering target-site PK-PD in antibiotic treatment optimisation. CONCLUSION: Given standard dosing regimens, ceftaroline appeared more effective than lefamulin against MRSA at soft-tissue concentrations. The PK-PD model-based approach applied in this study could be used to compare or explore the potential of antibiotics for specific indications or in populations with unique target-site PK.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Ceftarolina , Cefalosporinas , Diterpenos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Compuestos Policíclicos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Cefalosporinas/farmacocinética , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Tioglicolatos/farmacología , Tioglicolatos/farmacocinética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus disease is toxic and poorly effective and lacks a firm evidence base. Dual ß-lactam and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations may be interesting leads to improve treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the current preclinical studies on dual ß-lactam and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against M. abscessus. SOURCES: We performed a literature search using the National Center for Biotechnology Information's PubMed interface with additional snowball sampling. CONTENT: Select combinations of ß-lactam antibiotics, as well as ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations show promising in vitro activity and synergy against M. abscessus. ß-Lactam antibiotics differ in their ability to reach and interfere with their targets and their resistance to the M. abscessus ß-lactamase. The synergy is typically observed for combinations of ß-lactam antibiotics or a ß-lactam antibiotic with a ß-lactamase inhibitor. No additional killing capacity was demonstrated in three-drug combinations of synergistic ß-lactam antibiotics and a ß-lactamase inhibitor. The efficacy of select dual ß-lactam antibiotics and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations is retained in intracellular infection assays and mouse models, but no combination has a complete preclinical portfolio. IMPLICATIONS: Future clinical strategies should entail either dual ß-lactam or ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Imipenem-ceftaroline and an all-oral tebipenem-avibactam combination are promising leads but still require a complete preclinical portfolio, target product profiles as well as clinical trial confirmation.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas , Mycobacterium abscessus , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , beta-Lactamas , Mycobacterium abscessus/efectos de los fármacos , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamas/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/microbiología , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/farmacología , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Animales , Pruebas de Sensibilidad MicrobianaRESUMEN
Purpose: To assess the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and a panel of comparator agents against isolates of Gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, ß-hemolytic streptococci, and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) from blood collected in Africa and Middle East (AfME), Asia Pacific (APAC), Europe, Latin America (LATAM), and North America from 2017 to 2020 as a part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program. Methods: Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration were determined using broth microdilution for all antimicrobial agents by a central reference laboratory according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Results: Ceftaroline showed good activity (susceptibility ≥89.8%, MIC90 0.008-2 mg/L) against all Gram-positive isolates tested. All isolates of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, and S. pyogenes were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC90 0.008-0.25 mg/L). Ceftaroline susceptibility for MRSA isolates was 89.8% globally (MIC90 2 mg/L). Among the comparator agents, all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, except S. epidermis (susceptibility, 99.9%). Among other agents, daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline showed potent activity (susceptibility ≥97.9%, MIC90 0.03-2 mg/L) against all isolates tested. Conclusion: Ceftaroline showed potent in vitro activity against global bloodstream isolates of Gram-positive bacteria collected between 2017 and 2020. Monitoring and surveillance of global as well as regional longitudinal trends of resistance rates among Gram-positive isolates causing bloodstream infections are important to limit the spread of AMR, establish stewardship measures, and manage and appropriately treat infections.
RESUMEN
Initial antibiotics for true Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia include vancomycin or linezolid, but if bacteremia persists, consideration should be made for salvage combination therapy regimes such as daptomycin with ceftaroline.
RESUMEN
There is an increasing need for new synergistic antimicrobial combinations against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Our objective was to evaluate the activity of ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and their combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates recovered at two centers in Turkey. Activities of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole were tested against 100 MRSA isolates using gradient diffusion method. Activities of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole in combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against 20 selected isolates (including all isolates that were non-susceptible to ceftaroline or ceftobiprole, and randomly selected isolates) were investigated using MIC:MIC ratio method. Antimicrobial interactions were interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The MIC50/MIC90 values for ceftaroline and ceftobiprole were 0.75/1 and 1/1.5 mg/L, respectively. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole susceptibility rates among 100 MRSA isolates were 94% and 96%, respectively. Ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole MICs of isolates were not increased when ceftaroline or ceftobiprole was combined with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Ceftobiprole- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination demonstrated additivity against 35%, whereas ceftaroline- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination demonstrated additivity against 10% of 20 MRSA isolates. The remaining interactions for MRSA isolates were indifference. Three (75%) of four ceftobiprole-resistant isolates became susceptible to ceftobiprole after adding trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. None of the ceftaroline non-susceptible isolates became susceptible to ceftaroline after adding trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Ceftobiprole- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination may be a better treatment option than ceftaroline- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination for MRSA infections. Clinical studies are needed to confirm the results of our in vitro study.
RESUMEN
External ventricular drain-related cerebrospinal fluid infection represents a fearsome complication of neurosurgical interventions. Although vancomycin represents the standard of care for methicillin-resistant CoNS healthcare-associated ventriculitis, resistance phenomena have been described. We reported a case of a persistent external ventricular fluid drain infection after device removal by pandrug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis successfully treated with intravenous ceftaroline in combination with fosfomycin and vancomycin. No evidence regarding pandrug-resistant S. epidermidis therapy currently exists to our knowledge. In this case, the S. epidermidis phenotype emerged during the therapy course, possibly due to initial device retention, biofilm formation and the host immune impaired response. Despite being poorly studied in vivo, ceftaroline may be considered an option when other alternatives are unavailable, thanks to its described activity against CoNS in vitro. This case extends the experience with ceftaroline for central nervous system infections suggesting it could also be used in high antimicrobial resistance settings for immunocompromised people.
Asunto(s)
Fosfomicina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Ceftarolina , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus epidermidis/genética , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Drenaje , Pruebas de Sensibilidad MicrobianaRESUMEN
The recently published European Society of Cardiology guidelines for infective endocarditis management recommends daptomycin combination therapy for the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis in severe penicillin allergy, rather than daptomycin monotherapy. We discuss the evidence base behind this recommendation, highlighting concerns regarding the lack of robust clinical studies, increased cost and logistical considerations, and adverse effects of combination therapy. Although further studies are required to elucidate the role of combination vs monotherapy in these patients, we propose a pragmatic management approach to reduce the risk of adverse antimicrobial side effects and limit costs, while aiming to maintain treatment efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Daptomicina , Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes biofilm-related medical device infections. Phage-antibiotic combinations offer potential therapy due to proven in vitro antibiofilm efficacy. We evaluated phage-antibiotic synergy against biofilms using modified checkerboard and 24-h time-kill assays. Humanized-simulated daptomycin (DAP) (10, 8, and 6 mg/kg q24h) and ceftaroline (CPT) (600 mg q12h) were combined with Intesti13, Sb-1, and Romulus phages (tMOI 1, q12h). Assays were conducted in 168-h biofilm reactor models against DAP non-susceptible (DNS) vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (VISA) MRSA D712 and DAP-susceptible MRSA 8014. Synergistic activity and bactericidal activity were defined as ≥2log10 CFU/mL reduction from antibiotic-only regimens and ≥3log10 CFU/mL decrease from baseline at 24 h. Differences were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test (P ≤ 0.05 is considered significant). Surviving bacteria were examined for antibiotic minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) changes and phage susceptibility. In 168-h biofilm models, humanized DAP 10 mg/kg + CPT, combined with a 2-phage cocktail (Intesti13 + Sb-1) against D712, and a 3-phage cocktail (Intesti13 + Sb-1 + Romulus) against 8014, demonstrated synergistic bactericidal activity. At 168 h, bacteria were minimally detectable [2log10 CFU/cm2 (-Δ4.23 and -Δ4.42 log10 CFU/cm2; both P < 0.001)]. Antibiotic MBIC remained unchanged compared to baseline across various time points. None of the tested bacteria at 168 h exhibited complete phage resistance. This study reveals bactericidal efficacy of DAP + CPT with 2-phage and 3-phage cocktails against DNS VISA and MRSA isolates (D712 and 8014) in biofilm models, maintaining susceptibility. Further research is needed for diverse strains and durations, aligning with infection care. IMPORTANCE: The prevalence of biofilm-associated medical device infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presents a pressing medical challenge. The latest research demonstrates the potential of phage-antibiotic combinations (PACs) as a promising solution, notably in vitro antibiofilm efficacy. By adopting modified checkerboard and 24-h time-kill assays, the study investigated the synergistic action of phages combined with humanized-simulated doses of daptomycin (DAP) and ceftaroline (CPT). The results were promising: a combination of DAP, CPT, and either a 2-phage or 3-phage cocktail effectively exhibited bactericidal activity against both DAP non-susceptible vancomycin intermediate S. aureus MRSA and DAP-susceptible MRSA strains within 168-h biofilm models. Moreover, post-treatment evaluations revealed no discernible rise in antibiotic resistance or complete phage resistance. This pioneering work suggests the potential of PACs in addressing MRSA biofilm infections, setting the stage for further expansive research tailored to diverse bacterial strains and treatment durations.
Asunto(s)
Bencimidazoles , Ácidos Carboxílicos , Daptomicina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Daptomicina/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Ceftarolina , Biopelículas , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiologíaRESUMEN
This case report details the management of a 79-year-old male with recurrent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus capitis bacteremia and endocarditis. The patient's clinical journey encompassed multiple hospital admissions, with challenges in managing endocarditis, pacemaker replacements, and potential cutaneous sources of infection. The treatment regimen included intravenous antibiotic therapy during hospitalization and suppressive antibiotic treatment upon discharge, alongside a decolonization strategy for his scalp lesions.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Endocarditis Bacteriana , Staphylococcus capitis , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus capitis/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus capitis/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus capitis/genética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive pathogens is a relevant concern, particularly in the hospital setting. Several antibiotics are now available to treat these drug-resistant pathogens, such as daptomycin, dalbavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and fosfomycin. However, antibiotic resistance can also affect these newer molecules. Overall, this is not a frequent phenomenon, but it is a growing concern in some settings and can compromise the effectiveness of these molecules, leaving few therapeutic options. We reviewed the available evidence about the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance to these antibiotics and the main molecular mechanisms of resistance, particularly methicillin-resistant Sthaphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. We discussed the interpretation of susceptibility tests when minimum inhibitory concentrations are not available. We focused on the risk of the emergence of resistance during treatment, particularly for daptomycin and fosfomycin, and we discussed the strategies that can be implemented to reduce this phenomenon, which can lead to clinical failure despite appropriate antibiotic treatment. The judicious use of antibiotics, epidemiological surveillance, and infection control measures is essential to preserving the efficacy of these drugs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Ceftaroline, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, has activity against Gram-positive and several Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline and comparators against isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and respiratory tract infections (RTIs) collected in Latin America (LATAM) in 2016-2020 as part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program (ATLAS). METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined using both Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. RESULTS: Ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (CLSI/EUCAST: MIC90 0.25 mg/L; susceptibility 100%), whereas activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus varied for SSTIs (MIC90 1 mg/L; susceptibility 92.5%) and RTIs isolates (MIC90 2 mg/L; susceptibility 72.9%) isolates. For Streptococcus pneumoniae, particularly penicillin-resistant isolates commonly causing respiratory infections, high ceftaroline activity (MIC90 0.25 mg/L; susceptibility 100%/98.4%) was noted. All isolates of ß-hemolytic streptococci were susceptible to ceftaroline (S. agalactiae: MIC90 0.03 mg/L [SSTIs]; MIC90 0.015 mg/L (RTIs); susceptibility 100%; S. pyogenes: MIC90 0.008 mg/L; susceptibility 100%). Ceftaroline was highly active against Haemophilus influenzae, including ß-lactamase positive isolates (MIC90 0.06 mg/L; susceptibility 100%/85.7%). Ceftaroline demonstrated high activity against non-ESBL-producing GNB (E. coli: MIC90 0.5 mg/L, susceptibility 91.9%; K. pneumoniae: MIC90 0.25 mg/L, susceptibility 95.1%; K. oxytoca, MIC90 0.5 mg/L; susceptibility 95.7%). CONCLUSION: Ceftaroline was active against the recent collection of bacterial pathogens commonly causing SSTIs and RTIs in LATAM. Local and regional surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns are crucial to understand evolving resistance and guide treatment management.