RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) provides a more accurate and granular estimation of direct variable costs compared with traditional accounting methods. This study used TDABC to quantitatively compare the same-day facility costs of open carpal tunnel release (CTR) performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 474 unilateral CTR (182 MAC and 292 WALANT) performed at an orthopedic specialty hospital between 2015 and 2021. Itemized facility costs were calculated using a TDABC algorithm. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and itemized costs were compared between those treated under MAC (MAC-CTR) and WALANT (WALANT-CTR). Multivariable regression was performed to determine the independent effect of MAC on true facility costs. RESULTS: Total facility costs were $170 higher in MAC-CTR compared with WALANT-CTR ($652 vs $482). Monitored anesthesia care-CTR cases had higher personnel costs ($537 vs $394), likely because of higher surgery personnel ($303 vs $185) and postanesthesia care unit personnel costs ($117 vs $95). Monitored anesthesia care-CTR cases also had higher supply costs ($119 vs $81). When controlling for demographics and comorbidities, MAC-CTR was independently associated with an increase in personnel costs by $150.65 (95% CI, $131.09-$170.21), supply costs by $24.99 (95% CI, $9.40-$40.58), and total facility costs by $175.66 (95% CI, $150.18-$201.09) per case. CONCLUSIONS: Using TDABC, MAC-CTR was found to be 35% more costly to the facility compared with WALANT-CTR. Notably, WALANT-CTR facility costs presented here do not include additional cost savings from anesthesiologist service fees or preoperative laboratory clearance required for MAC-CTR surgeries. To reduce costs related to CTR surgery, greater efforts should be made to reduce the number of intraoperative personnel and maximize the use of WALANT-CTR in an outpatient setting. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis II.

RESUMEN

Percutaneous ultrasound-assisted carpal tunnel (CT) release is an emerging minimally invasive technique in hand surgery that could reduce complications, enhance patient satisfaction, and facilitate earlier return to daily activities. Among the various devices employed for this procedure, the Sono-Instrument allows pin-hole surgery. Its safety and effectiveness have been established. This study presents the technical nuances, pearls and pitfalls, advantages, and challenges of using the Sono-Instrument for percutaneous ultrasound-assisted CT release.

RESUMEN

This case report presents a 72-year-old female with a unique anatomical variation of the median nerve recurrent motor branch that has not been described in the literature. During her open carpal tunnel release, the recurrent motor branch was found to divide from the median nerve within the carpal tunnel, pierce the proximal aspect of the transverse carpal ligament in a transligamentous fashion, and then immediately divide into one branch that pierced the thenar muscles and another branch that traveled superficial to the transverse carpal ligament before piercing the thenar muscles more distal. This variation in anatomy stresses the importance of thoughtful incision design and direct visualization of all structures during carpal tunnel release.

RESUMEN

In patients with severe, long-standing carpal tunnel syndrome and thenar muscle atrophy, nerve decompression alone is unlikely to restore thumb opposition. A multitude of tendon transfer techniques have been described to restore thumb opposition. We describe the technique of an endoscopic carpal tunnel release with opponensplasty using ring finger flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon under Wide Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) and ultrasound assistance.

RESUMEN

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a condition that causes discomfort due to the compression of the median nerve in the wrist. Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a surgical procedure that can help alleviate the symptoms of CTS. Two methods are commonly used for CTR: endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). The choice of method can impact surgical outcomes and potential complications. This review aims to compare the outcomes of both methods for individuals diagnosed with CTS. This systematic review analyzes the outcomes and potential complications of ECTR and OCTR for CTS. The study encompassed a comprehensive analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses comparing both methods. We searched for studies released between January 2012 and October 2023 on PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The researchers assessed the quality of studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) tool. The study's scope included a range of outcomes and complications, such as symptom relief, functional recovery, grip strength, return to work, patient satisfaction, scar sensitivity, pillar pain, wound complications, nerve-related issues, morphological changes, and recurrence. The review analyzed 11 studies, including seven RCTs and four meta-analyses. These studies evaluated 4367 ECTR and 4107 cases of OCTR. The patients' ages ranged from 46 to 58, and the follow-up periods ranged from three to 24 months. The findings reveal that ECTR has comparable or better outcomes than OCTR, particularly in postoperative discomfort, functional recovery, grip strength, resumption of work, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, ECTR has lower levels of scar sensitivity, pillar pain, and wound-related complications than OCTR. However, ECTR carries a higher risk of reversible nerve injury. There were no substantial differences between the two techniques regarding other potential complications. Both ECTR and OCTR are safe and effective interventions for CTS. ECTR has benefits like faster recovery and improved cosmetic outcomes but requires higher technical proficiency and carries the risk of nerve injury. The choice of technique should consider patient preference, cost-effectiveness, and surgeon expertise.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral nerve compressive neuropathy in clinical practice. Patients who fail nonsurgical management are indicated for carpal tunnel release (CTR), which can be performed open or endoscopically. Efforts have been made to utilize local anesthesia instead of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for endoscopic release. This study seeks to compare perioperative surgical times and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic CTR with local anesthesia versus MAC. Methods: This is a 6-year retrospective study of 1,036 patients undergoing isolated endoscopic CTR with MAC (n = 607) versus local (n = 429) anesthesia within an outpatient surgical center. A combination of chi-square and t tests was used to compare the patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes. Results: The local cohort demonstrated significantly shorter postoperative time to discharge (15.9 ± 9.8 vs 53.8 ± 11.0 minutes; P < .05), total time spent in surgical center (83.2 ± 18.7 vs 129.3 ± 20.7 minutes; P < .05), shorter total operating room time (26.7 ± 4.3 vs 29.0 ± 4.1 minutes; P < .05) and tourniquet time (12.4 ± 2.5 vs 13.1 ± 2.1 minutes; P < .05). Preoperative and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were similar between the cohorts (P > .05); however, PROMIS pain interference improved to a higher degree between pre- and post-op in the local group (-1.5 vs -0.8; P = .02). Early and late surgical complications were similar between the groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Patients within the MAC cohort demonstrated longer postoperative time to discharge and total time in the surgical center. The MAC cohort had longer operating room and tourniquet time, albeit not clinically significant. Surgical complications and PROMIS scores were similar between the two groups. Our findings suggest that local anesthesia is a safe and effective option for endoscopic CTR and may offer advantages in cost and convenience for patients. Type of study/level of evidence: Retrospective cohort study/therapeutic III.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often face higher postoperative complication rates. Limited data exist regarding outcomes in T2DM patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR). This study compares complication rates between endoscopic CTR (ECTR) and open CTR (OCTR) in patients with T2DM. Methods: The TriNetX database was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of 67,225 patients with T2DM who underwent ECTR (n = 17,792) or OCTR (n = 49,433). Demographic data, medical comorbidities, and complication rates were analyzed. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals of postoperative median nerve injury, 6-week wound dehiscence, and 6-week wound infection. Results: After matching, a significantly greater number of ECTR patients had liver disease (P = <.001) and a body mass index > 40 (P = .001) compared to the OCTR group. These patients also had a lower incidence of fluid and electrolyte disorders (P = .003). Patients with T2DM who underwent ECTR had a significantly lower relative risk of 6-week wound infection, 6-week wound dehiscence, and median nerve injury (all P < .001) compared to patients who underwent OCTR. Conclusions: In our analysis of T2DM patients undergoing CTR, ECTR yielded significantly lower rates of wound infection, wound dehiscence, and nerve injury within 6-weeks post-surgery, reducing the risk by 43%, 52%, and 58%, respectively. These findings suggest that ECTR may result in a lower complication rate in this patient population. Type of study/level of evidence: III.

RESUMEN

Objectives: Vibration exposure is a known risk factor for developing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and insufficient outcomes for surgery for CTS have been reported after such exposure. We aim to investigate whether vibration exposure affects patient-reported outcomes following open carpal tunnel release. Methods: From a population surgically treated for CTS (n = 962), we identified patients who reported previous or present vibration exposure, had undergone preoperative electrophysiology testing and answered the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire before and at 12 months post-surgery (n = 23). We then matched the patients with controls based on age, sex, diabetes status, type of diabetes and smoking (n = 23). Results: Most of the patients included were men (17/23; 74% in each group) and had a mean age of 61 years. The preoperative electrophysiology results were slightly worse among vibration-exposed individuals, although the differences were not statistically significant. The QuickDASH scores did not differ between the two groups (preoperative QuickDASH scores in vibration-exposed individuals: median 45 [interquartile range; IQR 30-61]; non-exposed individuals: 43 [25-64], p = 0.68; postoperative 12 months QuickDASH score in vibration-exposed individuals: 20 [2-45]; non-exposed individuals: 14 [5-34], p = 0.87). Conclusions: When controlling for known confounders, vibration-exposed individuals can expect the same symptom relief following open carpal tunnel release as non-exposed individuals. Individual assessments and treatment of CTS are warranted if there is a history of vibration exposure.

RESUMEN

Background: Clinical quality measures exist for non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Factors predicting adherence are unclear. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic CTS using MarketScan Research Database (2015-2020) was conducted. Six logistic regression models were designed to study adherence to quality measures within 1 year after diagnosis. Results: Of 782,717 patients identified, 514,073 (65.7%) were female with an average (SD) age of 51.4 (13.4) years. Only 88 patients (0.01%) met all quality measures. Greatest compliance observed with receipt of nerve conduction study (NCS; 283,959 [36.3%]), no prescription of medications (336,297 [43.0%]) and no laser therapy (772,979 [98.8%]); 294,305 patients (37.6%) received hand surgeon referral. Hand surgeon referral predicted higher likelihood of NCS and splinting (OR, 1.83; 95% CI: 1.81-1.84; OR, 2.53; 95% CI: 2.50-2.56) and medication over-prescription (OR, 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.10). Females were more likely to be referred to a hand surgeon and be referred for splinting (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.18-1.21) but less likely to have no prescriptions or avoid laser therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.84-0.85; OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.86). Medicare recipients adhered less to quality measures compared to patients with fee-for-service insurance. As comorbidities increased, patients were less likely to receive hand surgeon referral and carpal tunnel release. Conclusions: Findings suggest that hand surgery referrals increased adherence to quality measures. Females, Medicare recipients and multimorbid patients should be targeted for improved care. Future quality care efforts should incentivise adherence for Medicare beneficiaries and improve guideline recognition amongst physicians. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a simple and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome in patients who have failed nonsurgical management. This surgery is often performed in the ambulatory clinic under local anesthesia, with lidocaine, a short-acting agent. Few studies have investigated the use of longer acting agents, such as bupivacaine, for outpatient CTR. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the postoperative pain experience after CTR with the use of either our standard lidocaine solution (control) or a mixture consisting of lidocaine and bupivacaine in equal amounts (intervention). METHODS: Patients undergoing CTR were randomized into control or intervention groups. Postoperative pain severity and numbness were recorded at several timepoints within the first 72 hours. The timing and quantity of postoperative analgesic use (acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen) was also documented. Both patients and assessor were blinded to allocation. RESULTS: Our study cohort included 139 patients: 67 in the control group and 72 in the intervention group. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the intervention group at 6 hours (2.3 vs 3.2) and 8 hours (2.9 vs 3.9). Additionally, patients in the intervention group reported longer time to first analgesic use than those in the control group (5.2 hours vs 3.7 hours). A greater proportion of patients in the intervention group reported postoperative numbness at nearly all time points, compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine improves early postoperative pain but causes prolonged finger numbness when compared to lidocaine alone. As both medications are effective and feasible for outpatient CTR, surgeon and patient preference should guide local anesthetic choice. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Ib.

RESUMEN

Background Hand surgeons have been charged with the use of diverse modalities to enhance the consenting process following the Montgomery ruling. Artificial Intelligence language models have been suggested as patient education tools that may aid consent. Methods We compared the quality and readability of the Every Informed Decision Online (EIDO) patient information leaflet for carpal tunnel release with the artificial intelligence language model Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT). Results The quality of information by ChatGPT was significantly higher using the DISCERN score, 71/80 for ChatGPT compared to 62/80 for EIDO (p=0.014). DISCERN interrater observer reliability was high (0.65) using the kappa statistic. Flesch-Kincaid readability scoring was 12.3 for ChatGPT and 7.5 for EIDO, suggesting a more complex reading age for the ChatGPT information. Conclusion The artificial intelligence language model ChatGPT produces high-quality information at the expense of readability when compared to EIDO information leaflets for carpal tunnel release consent.

RESUMEN

Background: Patients often access online resources to educate themselves prior to undergoing elective surgery such as carpal tunnel release (CTR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate available online resources regarding CTR on objective measures of readability (syntax reading grade-level), understandability (ability to convey key messages in a comprehensible manner), and actionability (providing actions the reader may take). Methods: The study conducted two independent Google searches for "Carpal Tunnel Surgery" and among the top 50 results, analyzed articles aimed at educating patients about CTR. Readability was assessed using six different indices: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, Coleman Liau Index, Automated Readability Index. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool evaluated understandability and actionability on a 0-100% scale. Spearman's correlation assessed relationships between these metrics and Google search ranks, with p<0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results: Of the 39 websites meeting the inclusion criteria, the mean readability grade level exceeded 9, with the lowest being 9.4 ± 1.5 (SMOG index). Readability did not correlate with Google search ranking (lowest p=0.25). Mean understandability and actionability were 59% ± 15 and 26% ± 24, respectively. Only 28% of the articles used visual aids, and few provided concise summaries or clear, actionable steps. Notably, lower grade reading levels were linked to higher actionability scores (p ≤ 0.02 in several indices), but no readability metrics significantly correlated with understandability. Google search rankings showed no significant association with either understandability or actionability scores. Conclusion: Online educational materials for CTR score poorly in readability, understandability, and actionability. Quality metrics do not appear to affect Google search rankings. The poor quality metric scores found in our study highlight a need for hand specialists to improve online patient resources, especially in an era emphasizing shared decision-making in healthcare. Level of Evidence: IV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) versus open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) in treating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), focusing on symptom relief, functional recovery and post-operative complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 patients diagnosed with CTS, randomly assigned to undergo either ECTR (n=23) or OCTR (n=21). Parameters evaluated included post-operative pain, grip strength, functional status using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and time to return to work. Results: Patients who underwent ECTR demonstrated superior functional recovery and quicker return to daily and work activities compared to those in the OCTR group. Grip strength improvement post-surgery showed no significant difference between the groups. However, ECTR patients reported significantly lower DASH scores and faster return to work, indicating better outcomes. There were fewer reports of post-operative complications and scar sensitivity in the ECTR group. Conclusion: ECTR provides an effective alternative to OCTR for CTS treatment, with advantages in functional recovery speed, reduced post-operative discomfort and faster return to work. These findings support the adoption of ECTR as a preferred surgical approach for CTS, highlighting its potential to improve patient outcomes with minimal complications.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare differences in the incidence of amyloid deposition in tenosynovium (TS) versus transverse carpal ligament (TCL) biopsies obtained during open carpal tunnel release. We hypothesized that the incidence of amyloid would be similar between TCL and TS when obtaining both specimens from the same patient. METHODS: All primary, elective open carpal tunnel release cases that underwent biopsy for amyloid between January 2022 and September 2023 were reviewed. Tenosynovial and TCL specimens were independently evaluated by a pathologist to assess for amyloid. Demographic data were collected, and incidence of amyloid deposition was compared between the two samples. Agreement statistics, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for TCL, using TS as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 196 cases met either Tier 1 (n=180) or Tier 2 (n=16) biopsy criteria. Forty-eight cases were excluded for missed biopsies or laboratory processing errors, leaving 148 cases available for analysis. Amyloid deposition was present in 31 out of 148 (21%) TS specimens and 33 out of 148 (22%) TCL specimens. Overall, the results of the TS biopsy agreed with TCL biopsy in 138 out of 148 cases (93%). In the 10 cases for which the results of the TCL and TS biopsy differed, six cases had (+) TCL and (-) TS, and four cases had amyloid deposition in TS without evidence of deposition in the TCL. Sensitivity and specificity values for the TCL specimen were 87% and 95%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 82% and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For cases of open carpal tunnel release undergoing biopsy, amyloid deposition was noted in 21% of TS specimens and 22% of TCL specimens. Results of TS and TCL biopsies obtained from the same patient agreed in 93% of cases. Single-source biopsy for amyloid represents a reasonable diagnostic approach. Future cost analyses should be performed to determine whether the addition of two biopsy sources to improve diagnostic accuracy is justified. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of anomalies in patients who underwent endoscopic carpal tunnel release and their relationship with clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included 65 hands of 57 patients (8 men and 49 women; mean age, 64.9 years) who underwent endoscopic carpal tunnel release for carpal tunnel syndrome at our hospital between March 2016 and April 2022. The patients were diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome based on clinical observations and electrophysiological studies. On T2-weighted magnetic resonance axial images, the height of the hook of the hamate was measured from the bottom to the tip of the hook, and the total height of the hamate was measured from the dorsal surface of the hamate to the tip of the hook. A hook-to-height ratio of less than 0.34 was defined as hypoplastic, and its incidence was investigated. In addition, electrodiagnostic testing of sensory and motor nerve conduction of the median nerve and patient-reported outcome measurements, including Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire, and visual analog scale score, were investigated at 6 months after surgery. Adverse events were collected from patient records. Results: The mean hook-to-height ratio was 0.40. Hypoplasia with a ratio ≤0.34 was observed in seven hands (10.8%), and adverse events were observed only in the two cases that had a hypoplastic hook of the hamate (3.07%). The patient-reported outcome measurements and the result of electrodiagnostic testing at 6 months after surgery did not correlate with the height of the hook of the hamate. Conclusions: The incidence of a hypoplastic hook of the hamate is common in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, and preoperative evaluation of the morphology of the hooks and indications for endoscopic carpal tunnel release in cases of hypoplastic hooks may help predict adverse events. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic Ⅳ.

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to compare unplanned postoperative patient communication in the form of phone calls and/or electronic patient portal messages (EPPM) after carpal tunnel release (CTR) for patients with and without a postoperative opioid prescription. Methods: We identified all patients ≥18 years of age who underwent primary CTR between 2017 and 2022 without an opioid ordered within 90 days prior to surgery. The following two groups were created: cases with and without an opioid prescribed on the day of surgery. We recorded baseline demographics for all patients and recorded all unplanned communication (phone calls and EPPM) sent from a patient to the surgeon's office within 14 days after surgery. Unadjusted associations between unplanned communication and case characteristics were evaluated. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between opioid status and unplanned communication. Results: A total of 5,735 CTRs were included, and 54% of the patients were prescribed an opioid on the day of surgery. Forty-two percent of cases had unplanned postoperative communication, and 48.1% of cases, without an opioid prescription, had unplanned communication compared with 36.8% in the opioid group. Patients who were prescribed opioids were 0.62 times less likely to contact the surgeon's office via phone calls or EPPM (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56, 0.70). Increased age was associated with a reduction in the odds of unplanned contact (odds ratios [OR] = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), whereas higher body mass index was significantly associated with increased communication (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.09). Conclusions: Patients prescribed opioids after CTR are 0.62 times less likely to contact the surgeon's office after surgery. Considering the 11% increase in unplanned postoperative communication after CTR, surgeons should consider alternative methods that have previously been demonstrated to reduce opioid consumption. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic II.

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of office-based carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance (CTR-US). Methods: In this prospective multicenter observational study, patients were treated with CTR-US in an office setting. Outcomes were time to resume normal daily activities, time to return to work, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale scores, Michigan Hand Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Scale, EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5-Level score, procedure satisfaction, and adverse events over 6 months. Results: A total of 149 participants (226 hands) from seven centers underwent office-based CTR-US. The mean age was 58 years, 52% were women, and 68% were employed. The mean incision length was 5 mm, 52% had simultaneous bilateral procedures, and wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet was used in all cases. All procedures were completed as planned, with no conversions to open repair and mean intraoperative pain severity of 1.6 ± 1.5. The median time to resume normal activities was 2 days (interquartile range: 1-4 days) and return to work was 4 days (interquartile range: 1-5 days). Over 6 months, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale decreased by a mean of 1.7 points, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale decreased by 1.1 points, Michigan Hand Questionnaire Global score increased by 35 points, Numeric Pain Scale decreased by 3.7 points, and EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5-Level score increased by 0.11 points. At 6 months, 94% reported procedure satisfaction. Unilateral and simultaneous bilateral procedures were similarly effective. There was one (0.4%) adverse event, a nerve contusion treated with neurolysis and nerve wrap where the patient fully regained normal function within 7 weeks. There were no revisions for persistent or recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms. Conclusions: Office-based CTR-US, performed either unilaterally or as simultaneous bilateral procedures, is well tolerated with a low complication rate and associated with rapid recovery, sustained improvement in symptoms and function, and high procedure satisfaction. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical results of carpal tunnel release using ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) at a minimum of 2 years postprocedure. Methods: The study consisted of 102 patients (162 hands) treated with CTR-US by the same physician between June 2017 and October 2020 for whom minimum 2-year follow-up data were available. Questionnaires were sent to gather long-term information, with additional phone calls for clarification if needed. Outcomes included Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity (BCTQ-SSS) and functional status (BCTQ-FSS) scores; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores; global satisfaction scores; and subsequent surgeries. Results: The 102 patients included 68 females and 34 males with a mean age of 56.9 years at the time of surgery. Fifty-five (53.9%) patients had simultaneous bilateral procedures, 42 (41.2%) had unilateral procedures, and 5 (4.9%) had staged bilateral procedures. Significant improvements in BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and QuickDASH scores persisted at a mean final follow-up of 46 months (range 2-6 years). At final follow-up, 91.2% of patients reported satisfaction with the procedure. No outcomes were significantly different between those treated with simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral procedures. No revision surgeries were reported. Conclusions: CTR-US is a safe and effective procedure that results in significant improvements that persist up to 6 years postprocedure. Long-term results of simultaneous bilateral and unilateral procedures are similar. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

RESUMEN

Background Failure of carpal tunnel release is an uncommon occurrence with unique pathologies that may impede proper diagnosis and treatment. Symptoms are most often attributed to an inadequate release of the transverse carpal ligament or pathologic scar tissue resultant of the primary decompression. Case Description In this report, we describe the case of a 79-year-old male with a history of scaphoid lunate advanced collapse and a prior carpal tunnel decompression presenting with worsening right wrist function and new right palmar mass. The patient had no significant antecedent trauma, and clinical workup revealed volar dislocation of the lunate. After failed conservative treatment and multiple ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections, the patient was successfully treated surgically with carpal tunnel release, tenosynovectomy, and lunate excision. Literature Review Volar lunate dislocation without a traumatic mechanism is rare. Progressive carpal destabilization and volar subluxation is not a commonly reported cause of secondary carpal tunnel symptoms. Isolated reports in the literature have been published with nearly identical presentations. Kamihata et al reported a patient, with a history of carpal tunnel decompression, presenting with numbness and tingling in her right hand without traumatic injury. A displaced lunate was found to abut the flexor tendons and median nerve. Ott et al further reported an atraumatic lunate dislocation and palmar swelling 4 weeks after a carpal tunnel release. Clinical Relevance In the setting of existing arthritic degeneration, carpal tunnel release may destabilize the carpus and predispose patients to carpal dislocation. Further research is required to understand the risks associated with this instability leading to lunate dislocations secondary to carpal tunnel release.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Environmental sustainability is an important issue in health care because of large amounts of greenhouse gases attributable to hospitals. The operating room has been highlighted as one of the highest contributors, prompting several initiatives by organizations focused on the care of hand and upper extremity conditions. This study aimed to quantify and compare the carbon footprint of a common hand surgery in two different surgical settings, the procedure room (PR) and operating room. We hypothesized that open carpal tunnel release (oCTR) will generate a greater environmental impact in the operating room than in the PR. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of oCTRs performed at a tertiary care medical center. Current procedural technology codes isolated a single cohort of patients who underwent bilateral oCTR, one side performed in the PR and the contralateral side in the operating room. Current published emission conversions were used to calculate carbon footprint at our institution based on energy expenditure necessary for the creation and disposal of waste and sterilization of surgical equipment. Surgery time was combined with heating, ventilation and air conditioning/lighting energy consumption to estimate facility emissions. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had bilateral oCTR surgery performed in both settings. Open CTR performed in the operating room generated 3.7 kg more solid waste than when performed in the PR. In total, emissions from oCTR performed in the operating room generated 32.4 kg CO2, whereas oCTR in the PR emitted 13.0 kg CO2 per surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a common hand procedure (oCTR) is more environmentally sustainable in the PR than in the operating room, with a 60% reduction in carbon footprint. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Greater effort should be made to perform surgery in the PR instead of the operating room in appropriately indicated patients. Surgical sets should be evaluated for the necessity of included equipment and unnecessary waste.

Asunto(s)