RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine structural and process readiness for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) care at referral-level facilities in Ghana and Uganda to identify opportunities for strengthening. DESIGN: Mixed-methods cross-sectional study. SETTING: Three districts in Ghana and two in Uganda. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Nine hospitals in Ghana and seven in Uganda; all hospitals had theoretical capacity for caesarean section and blood transfusion. METHODS: We deployed a modular quantitative health facility assessment to explore structural readiness (drugs, equipment, staff) complemented by in-depth interviews with maternity health service providers to understand process readiness (knowledge, attitudes, and practices as related to World Health Organization [WHO] guidance on PPH care). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability of essential structural components needed to support key PPH processes of care. RESULTS: In both countries, there was generally good structural readiness for PPH care. However, key common gaps included inadequate staffing (especially specialist physicians), and unavailability of blood for transfusion. Interviews highlighted particularly good process readiness in the provision of uterotonics, recognising and responding to retained placenta, and repairing tears. However, there were clear gaps in the utilisation of tranexamic acid and uterine balloon tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified good structural and process readiness across both Ghanaian and Ugandan health facilities to support PPH responses. However, some key missed opportunities-to align with current WHO guidance on providing bundles of interventions for PPH care-could be strengthened with minimal investment but promising impact.

RESUMEN

Introduction Caesarean section (CS) is a lifesaving operation; it can have many complications in subsequent pregnancies. Since the uterine wall and cavity are not normal after CS, the implantation and subsequent trophoblastic invasion and placenta formation may be affected. This study was carried out to find out implantation and placental problems encountered in subsequent pregnancies. The spectrum includes placenta accreta, increta, and percreta and is characterized microscopically by a complete or partial absence of decidua and placental adherence to or invasion of the myometrium. The study was performed to find out the complications of CS in subsequent pregnancies and take measures to detect them early and take appropriate action.  Materials and methods This retrospective study was carried out at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre Pimpri, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, a large tertiary care centre. Many complications like placenta previa, adherent placenta, ectopic pregnancy, obstetrical hysterectomy, etc, the ones directly related to implantation and placentation, were recorded and compared with the literature. Results and observations The study was over a period of three years. During this period, there were 10,296 antenatal cases registered; of all the registered cases, 2,544 were cases of post-caesarean pregnancy. There were three cases of tubal ectopic pregnancy, two were diagnosed as the patients complained of amenorrhoea, spotting, and pain abdomen, confirmed on sonography and one was picked up on a routine first-trimester scan. There were two cases of scar ectopic pregnancy. Both the cases were diagnosed as threatened abortion initially and ultrasound confirmed the diagnosis; both were managed medically. Five cases of placenta previa were encountered. There were three cases of morbidly adherent placenta, and two cases underwent obstetrical hysterectomy. Conclusion All surgical procedures have become safe, but they all have some complications. Many complications in the next pregnancy after caesarean are life-threatening and dangerous. These complications should be detected early to prevent any catastrophic event.

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare frequency of caesarean section in singleton primary-para women induced at 39 week and its comparison with conventional management. The other objective was comparison of perinatal and neonatal outcomes. Method: Open random allocation study was conducted at Gynae/Obst Department JPMC during period from 1st June 2022 to 30th September 2023. Primiparous women with singleton pregnancy without risk factors with gestational age 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks six days attending the anti-natal clinic offered to participate after consent. Non-probability convenience sampling method was used for induction. Randomization was done using random number table into one of the two groups, Group-A in which induction was done at 39 weeks while in Group-B induction was done conventionally. Mean age ±SD, gestational age and delivery time was calculated and compared by Student's t test. Frequency of CS, perinatal and neonatal outcomes was compared by χ2 test. Results: Eighty-two women were inducted in Group-A and eighty-five in Group-B. The mean delivery time in Group-A was significantly more at 8.12±2.77 hours while in Group-B was 7.0±2.62 hours (p = .005). Frequency of CS between two groups was not statistically significant, it was 5 (6.1%) in Group-A and 2 (2.4%) in Group-B (p = 0.412). No significant difference in frequency of NICU admission was seen, in Group-A 8.54% babies were admitted to NICU while in Group-B 16.47% were admitted to NICU (p = 0.122). Conclusion: No significant difference was observed in frequencies of CS, Foetal, Neonatal, and Maternal outcomes.

RESUMEN

Objective: It has been suggested that induction of labour before 42 weeks of pregnancy prevents foetal complications. To evaluate the maternal and foetal outcomes of induced and spontaneous labour beyond gestational week 41 + 0. Study design: We conducted a register-based nationwide cohort study that included pregnant women who were delivered in Sweden in 2016-2021. Women were classified into two groups: induction of labour (IOL) or spontaneous onset of labour (SOL). Maternal and foetal outcomes after IOL in gestational week 41 were compared with SOL in gestational week 41 and 42. Results: Comparison between the IOL (n = 23,772) and SOL (n = 62,611) groups in gestational weeks 41 showed that various parameters were higher in the IOL group: caesarean deliveries (12.3 % and 4.6 %, P < 0.001), vacuum extraction (8.7 % and 6.9 %, P < 0.001), blood loss of > 1000 ml during labour (11 % vs 8.3 %, P < 0.001). The risks were remained significant even after adjusting for potential confounders (caesarean delivery: aOR 2.36; 95 % CI, 2.23-2.50, vacuum delivery: aOR 1.09; 95 % CI, 1.03-1.16, P = 0.002, and blood loss of >1000 ml: aOR 1.25; 95 % CI 1.18-1.31). The proportions of stillbirths (0.07 % and 0.18, P < 0.001), and newborns with apgar scores < 4 at five minutes (0.4 % vs 0.3 %, P < 0.001), were also higher in the IOL group. The risk of stillbirth after IOL in gestational week 41 was increased relative to SOL in the same week and remained high after adjusting for potential confounders (aOR 1.75; 95 % CI 1.07-2.80, P = 0.025).The IOL group in gestational weeks 41 comprised a higher proportion of caesarean deliveries (12.3 % and 8.5 %, P < 0.001), but a lower (8.7 % and 9.7 %, P = 0.006) proportion of deliveries by vacuum extraction than the SOL group (n = 4548) in week 42. Conclusions: Inducing labour at gestational week 41 in women with prolonged pregnancies may have adverse effects on foetal and maternal outcomes compared to those who experience spontaneous labour onset at the same gestational age. The risk of negative foetal outcomes after induction at week 41 appears similar to that in women who give birth after spontaneous labour at week 42.

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: There is a limited knowledge base available to midwives, obstetricians and women planning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC), impeding their ability to make informed choices regarding planned place of birth. BACKGROUND: A VBAC is associated with fewer complications for both mother and baby, but little is known on the safety and success of planning a VBAC in midwifery led settings such as birth centres and home birth, compared to obstetric led settings. AIM: To synthesise the findings of published studies regarding maternal and neonatal outcomes with planned VBAC in midwifery setting compared to obstetric units. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL complete, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, and Science Citation Index databases were systematically searched on 16/08/2022 for all quantitative research on the outcomes for women planning VBAC in midwifery led settings compared to obstetric led settings in high income countries. Included studies were quality assessed using the CASP Checklist. Binary outcomes are incorporated into pairwise meta-analyses, effect sizes reported as risk ratios with 95 % confidence intervals. A τ² estimate of between-study variance was performed for each binary outcome analysis. Other, more heterogeneous outcomes are narratively reported. FINDINGS: Two high-quality studies, out of 420 articles, were included. VBAC planned in a midwifery-led setting was associated with a statistically significant increase in unassisted vaginal birth (RR=1.42 95 % CI 1.37 to 1.48) and decrease in emergency caesarean section (RR= 0.46 95 % CI 0.39 to 0.56) and instrumental birth (RR= 0.33 95 % CI 0.23 to 0.47) compared with planned VBAC in an obstetric setting. There were no significant differences in uterine rupture (RR= 1.03 95 % CI 0.52 to 2.07), admission to special care nursery (RR= 0.71 95 % CI 0.47 to 1.23) or Apgar score of 7 or less at 5 min (RR= 1.16 95 % CI 0.66 to 2.03). CONCLUSION: Planning VBAC in midwifery led settings is associated with increased vaginal birth and a reduction in interventions such as instrumental birth and caesarean section. Adverse perinatal outcomes are rare, and further research is required to draw conclusions on these risks.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the risk factors for Caesarean Scar Diverticulum (CSD) with Chronic Endometritis (CE) and the correlation between CE and clinical symptoms of CSD. METHODS: The frequency of CE in 44 patients with CSD who underwent surgical treatment and 20 control women who underwent total hysterectomy was assessed and the clinical symptoms in the presence and absence of CE were compared. In accordance with the presence of one or more CD138-positive plasma cells per high-power field, CE was classified as mild or severe group. RESULTS: According to multivariate analysis, the presence of mild CE (OR 8.963, 95 % CI 2.177-36.907, p = 0.002) or severe CE (OR 21.773, 95 % CI 2.285-207.419, p = 0.007) was significantly associated with CSD. Mild CE (OR 12.390, 95 % CI 1.158-132.511, p = 0.037) or severe CE (OR 22.463, 95 % CI 1.657-304.541, P = 0.019) or depth of diverticulum (OR 1.294, 95 % CI 1.003-1.668, p = 0.047) was associated with prolonged menstruation in patients with CSD. The degree of CE in patients with CSD was positively correlated with the days of prolonged menstruation (r = 0.552, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with haemoglobin level (r = -0.408, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: CE was associated with CSD and its clinical symptoms, including prolonged menstruation and decreased haemoglobin. The severity of clinical symptoms of CSD is associated with endometrial inflammation.

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate predictors of low birth satisfaction in a sample of Iranian postpartum women during the COVID-19 epidemics' fifth wave. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: This study was conducted on 676 postpartum women admitted to postpartum wards of Mobini maternity hospital using a convenience sampling method between 2 Aug and 18 September 2021 in Iran. We used the general linear model and multiple linear regression analyses to determine predictors of birth satisfaction. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation values of age and education were 28.7 ± 6.6 and 11.1 ± 4.1 (years), respectively. The mean scores of the three scales were as follows: FVC-19S (14.7 ± 7.5), WHO-5 (67.5 ± 13.0) and BSS-R (28.6 ± 7.3). Sixty-five point nine percent (65.9%) of the participants were multiparous. Overall predictors of low birth satisfaction were emergency caesarean, instrumental birth, episiotomy, Entonox analgesia, low level of well-being score < 50, fear of COVID-19, low satisfaction with pregnancy and low satisfaction with spouse's support. The overall proportion of the variance in birth satisfaction explained by all variables is 17.4%. Labor and birth variables explained 12.2% of the variance in birth satisfaction. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: None.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: To assess the association of adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes with different cut-off levels of glucose intolerance during pregnancy in the MAASTHI cohort. Design: Pregnant women (n = 1470) underwent Oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 36 weeks using a 75-g oral glucose load, with plasma glucose estimations measured at fasting and two hours later. Follow-up was done within 72 hours of delivery for recording type of delivery, infant weight, mid-upper arm circumference, and skinfold thickness. Results: The odds of having higher skinfold thickness (>90th percentile) were 43% higher (AOR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.74) and the odds of being overweight at birth was 34% higher (AOR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.62) for every 1 standard deviation (9.9 mg/dL) increase in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in male infants. The odds of delivering via caesarean section were 45% higher in women with female foetus (1.45,95% CI 1.15,1.82) for every one SD (23.4 mg/dl) increase in 2-h post-load Glucose. Conclusion: The impact of maternal glucose levels on infant and maternal outcomes differed notably between sex of the child. Compared to female infants, male infants exhibited a stronger association with elevated risks for adverse outcomes, including higher infant weight and increased skinfold thickness.

Glucose intolerance, in simple terms, refers to a condition where the body has difficulty processing sugar (glucose) properly. Normally, when we eat, our body breaks down carbohydrates into glucose, which is then used by cells for energy. However, in glucose intolerance, this process does not work as efficiently. This can lead to higher-than-normal blood sugar levels, which, if persistent, can increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes over time. In this study, the researchers investigated how glucose intolerance during pregnancy results in negative health outcomes in mothers and infants in a South Indian City. This is significant as the adverse impact of glucose intolerance in Indian women is not widely studied. The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study was considered by WHO for defining GDM diagnosis primarily focused on Caucasian populations. Given the known ethnic differences in glucose metabolism and the high prevalence of gestational diabetes in India, understanding glucose intolerance, specifically in Indian women, is essential. In this research, all pregnant mothers underwent an oral glucose tolerance test between the 24th and 36th weeks of pregnancy. They fasted for 12 hours before their blood samples were taken to measure their fasting glucose levels. Then, they drank a glucose solution containing 75 g of glucose. After waiting for 2 hours, their glucose levels were measured again. Those with fasting glucose levels equal to or greater than 92 mg/dl and 2-hour post-load plasma glucose levels equal to or greater than 153 mg/dl were diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). After delivery, the weight and fat deposition under the skin; known as skinfold thickness (adiposity) were measured using a skinfold caliper. The risks of higher weight and skinfold were seen in male infants compared to female infants. The overall risk of adiposity and C-section were higher than those reported in the HAPO study, highlighting the need for large-scale studies among the Indian population to better understand and address these associations.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most German hospitals do not offer a trial of labour after two caesarean sections (TOLA2C). TOLA2C is claimed to be associated with too many complications, above all the high risk of uterine rupture. The objective of this study is to review our experience with TOLA2C, with special attention paid to the risk and probability of uterine ruptures. Secondary outcomes include comparing neonatal and maternal outcomes in the group of TOLA2C with the group of elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) and to assess the success rate for vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2). METHODS: The retrospective cohort study was conducted in a community hospital in North Rhine-Westphalia. Inclusion criteria were all pregnant women with two caesarean sections in their medical history, with a current vertex singleton pregnancy and the absence of morphological abnormalities of the foetus, who gave birth in our facility between January 2015 and June 2021. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Fishers exact tests, Chi2 -tests and t-tests for independent samples were performed. RESULTS: A total of 91 cases were included in the TOLA2C-group. These were compared to 99 cases that, within the same time frame, had an elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS-group). There was no statistically significant difference found in the neonatal outcome between the two groups (except for the neonatal pH-value: p 0.024). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the TOLA2C-group, while maternal complication rates were almost similar (13.2% in the TOLA2C-Group, vs. 16.2% in the ERCS-Group). The success rate for TOLA2C was 55%. No complete uterine rupture was found, but in three cases an incomplete rupture (3.3% rate for incomplete uterine ruptures) occurred, but had no influence on the neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: TOLA2C is not associated with a worse maternal or neonatal outcome compared to ERCS, and especially the risk of complete uterine ruptures seems to be low. TOLA2C should be more widely offered to suitable patients who are motivated for it.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) presents a complex medical scenario with significant implications for maternal and neonatal health. This case report explores the intricacies surrounding MSAF, focusing on its diagnosis, treatment, and the associated meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). The report emphasizes the critical role of antibiotic prophylaxis in lower segment cesarean sections (LSCS) in balancing infection prevention in the mother with neonatal considerations. Additionally, it highlights personalized pain management and post-operative care regimens, contributing to a comprehensive strategy for maternal and neonatal well-being. A 27-year-old primigravida (primi) underwent a cesarean section due to the presence of meconium in the amniotic fluid, indicating fetal distress. The report meticulously documents vital signs, laboratory findings, and the timeline of events. The case report underscores the importance of diagnosing and treating MAS, offering valuable insights into management strategies and their impact on maternal and neonatal health. This case report emphasizes the critical role of antibiotic prophylaxis in LSCS to prevent maternal infection while considering neonatal well-being. The personalized pain management approach and post-operative care regimens contribute significantly to a comprehensive strategy for maternal and neonatal well-being. The findings provide valuable insights into diagnosing and treating MAS, highlighting the importance of timely intervention in similar clinical scenarios.

RESUMEN

This case report describes the findings of craniofacial anomalies associated with dystocia in a mixed-breed bitch. A bitch in labour was presented for evaluation of dystocia, and an emergency caesarean section was performed. Two pups with craniofacial abnormalities were delivered by hysterotomy. One pup was stillborn, with congenital anomalies including palatoschisis (cleft palate), cheiloschisis (cleft lip), an open fontanelle, and a narrow teardrop-shaped skull. The second pup was delivered alive and had cheiloschisis. Craniofacial malformations are a reported cause of dystocia in the dog, usually due to obstruction. However, dystocia in the reported case is presumed to have developed because the pup's craniofacial malformations prevented stimulation of uterine contractions. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case report to describe craniofacial abnormalities affecting 100% of the litter and is the first known report to describe the relationship between craniofacial abnormalities and presumptive primary uterine inertia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intra-operative pain during Caesarean delivery (PDCD) is the leading cause of successful litigation against obstetric anaesthesiologists. PDCD may require conversion to general anaesthesia (GA). The aim of this analysis is to assess our incidence of PDCD and associated GA conversion. METHODS: Data were collected from electronic patient records. Data included baseline demographics, incidence of PDCD and rates of GA conversion, proportion of PDCD cases attributable to failed epidural (EA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA), and level of sensory and motor blockade in cases of PDCD. Results were audited against current standards set by the Royal College of Anaesthetists 'rates of PDCD should be <5% for category 4, <15% for categories 2-3, and <20 % for category 1 CD ' and that 'rates of conversion to GA due to neuraxial complications should be <1% for category 4, <5% for categories 2-3 and <15% for category 1 patients'. RESULTS: During the 12-month study period, 2,429 patients underwent CD, of whom 52 (2.1%) experienced PDCD. The incidence of PDCD was 3.1% (41/1,309) for category 1-3 patients, while 1% (11/1,120) of category 4 patients experienced PDS. Of the 52 patients with PDCD, 17 patients required GA (33%). SA was used in 24/52 (47%) cases and EA in 28/52 (53%) cases. The median level of sensory block in patients with PDCD was located at the T4 dermatome, the median level of motor block was Bromage level 2. CONCLUSIONS: PDCD occurred in 2.1% of CD, one-third required conversion to GA. Most patients experiencing PDCD met current motor and sensory blockade criteria.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Nonspecific presentations during pregnancy can mask early signs and symptoms of upper abdominal tumours, making the preoperative diagnosis of upper abdominal tumours difficult. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is a rare exocrine tumour of the pancreas, and SPN in combination with preeclampsia during pregnancy is even rarer. CASE PRESENTATION: In this paper, we report a case of SPN combined with preeclampsia during pregnancy and sudden rupture of a giant retroperitoneal SPN during a caesarean section, which resulted in life-threatening intra-abdominal haemorrhage. After exclusion of obstetric factors, a rapid response team was activated, multidisciplinary treatment (MDT) was carried out, and the patient was treated promptly and appropriately by resection of the giant retroperitoneal tumour, partial resection of the body and tail of the pancreas, and abdominal drainage. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of SPN combined with preeclampsia during pregnancy, and a rapid and timely MDT could have ensured the patient's life. CONCLUSION: When dealing with a pregnant woman with an acute abdomen, the obstetrician should communicate fully with the woman to ensure that the most likely diagnosis is obtained. In the event of an unexpected accident during a caesarean section, it is important to remain calm, activate the Rapid Response Team and seek an MDT to ensure the life of the mother.

RESUMEN

In clinical practice, scar dehiscence following a previous cesarean section is a serious worry that necessitates close consideration of a number of contributing factors. We present the case of a 29-year-old gravida six, para three, who presented at 36 weeks of gestation with scar tenderness and abdominal discomfort at the site of her previous cesarean section scar. Despite a clear cardiovascular and respiratory examination, the lower-segment scar was notably thin at 1.2 mm, raising concerns for scar rupture. An emergency lower-segment cesarean section revealed a 4 x 2 cm scar dehiscence. The patient was counseled on the risks of future pregnancies and advised to consider tubal ligation. Early complications of cesarean delivery include wound hematoma, infection, and cesarean scar dehiscence (CSD), while long-term issues involve morbid adherent placentae and intra-abdominal adhesions. Short inter-pregnancy intervals and multiple cesarean deliveries are significant risk factors for CSD due to inadequate myometrial healing. Diagnostic imaging, particularly ultrasonography, is crucial for monitoring scar thickness and planning the timing of delivery. Management may involve conservative resuturing or hysterectomy in cases of severe infection or abscess formation. Early detection through vigilant prenatal care and monitoring, coupled with a multidisciplinary approach, can optimize maternal and fetal outcomes. Enhanced education for healthcare providers and expectant mothers, along with technological advancements, are key to improving the management of this complex obstetric dilemma.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Respiratory functions may be impaired in cesarean section (C/S) delivery performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) and oxygen supplementation may be required. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of different oxygen administrations in pregnant women on the lungs during C/S under SA using ultrasound and oxygen reserve index (ORI). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-center study from May 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. A total of 90 patients scheduled for C/S under SA were randomly divided into 3 groups. Following the SA, patients in group 0 were treated with room air, in Group 3 were administered 3 L/min O2 with a nasal cannula (NC), in Group 6 were administered 6 L/min O2 with a simple face mask. In addition to routine monitoring, ORI values were measured. Lung aeration was evaluated through the modified lung ultrasound score (LUS) before the procedure (T0), at minute 0 (T1), 20 (T2), and hour 6 (T3) after the procedure, and ∆LUS values were recorded. RESULTS: After SA, the ORI values of Group 3 were higher than Group 0 at all times (p < 0.05), while the intraoperative 1st minute and the 10th, 25th and 40th minutes after delivery (p = 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.001, p = 0.019) was higher than Group 6. When the LUS values of each group were compared with the T0 values a decrease was observed in Group 3 and Group 6 (p < 0.001, p = 0.016). While ∆LUS values were always higher in Group 3 than in Group 0, they were higher only in T1 and T2 in Group 6. CONCLUSION: We determined that it would be appropriate to prefer 3 L/min supplemental oxygen therapy with NC in C/S to be performed under SA.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal anaesthesia is a common anaesthetic method for caesarean sections but often results in hypotension, posing potential risks to maternal and neonatal health. Norepinephrine, as a vasopressor, may be effective in preventing and treating this hypotension. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for the treatment of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia in caesarean sections. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for relevant studies on prophylactic administration of norepinephrine for the treatment of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery. Reference lists of included articles were also searched. The latest search update was on March 20, 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software. The methods recommended by the Cochrane Handbook, Begge's and Egger's tests were used for risk of bias evaluation of the included literature. RESULTS: Nine studies were finally included in this study. The results showed that prophylactic administration of norepinephrine was superior to the control group in four aspects of treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery: the incidence of hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.34, 95%CI (0.27-0.43), P < 0.01]; the incidence of severe hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.21-0.51), P < 0.01]; and maternal blood pressure was more stable with MDPE [MD = -5.00, 95%CI (-7.80--2.21), P = 0.06] and MDAPE [MD = 4.11, 95%CI (1.38-6.85), P < 0.05], the incidence of nausea and vomiting was reduced [RR = 0.52, 95%CI (0.35-0.77), P < 0.01]. On the other hand, the incidence of reactive hypertension was higher than the control group [RR = 3.58, 95%CI (1.94-6.58), P < 0.01]. There was no difference between the two groups in one aspects: newborn Apgar scores [MD = -0.01, 95%CI (-0.10-0.09, P = 0.85)]. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of norepinephrine is effective in treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery patients; however, it does not provide improved safety and carries a risk of inducing reactive hypertension.

Hypotension, or low blood pressure, after spinal anaesthesia can threaten the health of both mothers and their babies during caesarean sections. Norepinephrine is a drug that affects heart rate less and does not easily cross the placental barrier, which may reduce its potential negative effects on the baby. However, there are not many studies on using norepinephrine as a preventive measure. Our study systematically evaluated the use of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to prevent hypotension in caesarean section patients. We found that it is effective in preventing low blood pressure but does not show improved safety and carries some risk of causing high pressure as a reaction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Pregnant women are more vulnerable to the severe effects of COVID-19 compared to their non-pregnant peers. Early in the pandemic, there was a rise in cesarean deliveries and preterm births among infected pregnant women. This study aims to evaluate whether there were any changes in obstetric interventions during the first two waves of the pandemic in Belgium. Methods: Between March 2020 and February 2021, the Belgian Obstetric Surveillance System (B.OSS) conducted an extensive, nationwide population-based registry study, that included nearly all births to women with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within six weeks before hospitalization in Belgium. The perinatal outcomes of these women were analyzed and compared with pre-pandemic regional perinatal data. Results: A total of 923 SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women were admitted to the hospital; 9.3 % were hospitalized for severe COVID-19, while the remaining were hospitalized for obstetric reasons. Infected women had a higher median BMI, a higher incidence of diabetes, and a greater proportion were overweight or obese compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). While the majority of women gave birth vaginally, symptomatic women and those with a severe infection had slightly higher rates of cesarean delivery, though not statistically significant after adjusting for confounders. Only severely ill women had an increased risk of preterm delivery (aOR 2.3; 95 %CI [1.2-2.5]; p = 0.02) and of induced labor (OR 1.8; 95 %CI [1.1-2.8]; p = 0.01). The use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery was more common in the infected group (OR 2.6; 95 %CI [1.6-4.1]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Obstetric interventions, such as cesarean delivery and induction, remained at pre-pandemic levels. However, a SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to have increased medically induced preterm delivery and the use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

RESUMEN

Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia stands as a cornerstone for patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS), offering advantages like faster onset and high block density. Levobupivacaine, known for its high potency and long-acting nature, has a slower onset. The safety of intrathecal fentanyl or midazolam is evaluated as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in parturients. This study aims to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by fentanyl or midazolam added to 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine in elective cesarean sections. Secondary objectives include evaluating the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Identifying the more effective adjuvant will help optimize spinal anesthesia protocols, improve postoperative outcomes, and enhance patient comfort and recovery. Methods This study was conducted at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, India, over six months (May 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023). A total of 90 patients undergoing elective LSCS received spinal anesthesia in a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Patients were allocated to three groups: Group A received levobupivacaine with fentanyl, Group B received levobupivacaine with midazolam, and Group C received levobupivacaine with normal saline. Block characteristics, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and complications were assessed. Assessments were conducted at specified time points: intraoperatively, every five minutes for the first 30 minutes, every 10 minutes for the next hour, every two hours for six hours, and every four hours up to 24 hours postoperatively. Statistical analysis utilized one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Group B (levobupivacaine with midazolam) exhibited a shorter time to sensory block onset (88 seconds) compared to Groups A and C (both 145 seconds) (p < 0.001). Group A (levobupivacaine with fentanyl) showed a shorter time to maximum motor block (p = 0.045) than Groups B and C. The sensory block duration was significantly longer in Group A (127.5 minutes) compared to Group B (60 minutes) and Group C (69 minutes) (p < 0.001). Motor block duration was also prolonged in Group A (251 minutes) compared to Group B (147 minutes) and Group C (177 minutes) (p = 0.045). The first analgesic requirement was delayed in Group A (248 minutes), whereas Groups B (115 minutes) and C (90 minutes) (p < 0.001) required more frequent analgesia. Group A experienced a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusion Midazolam accelerated sensory block onset, while fentanyl prolonged anesthesia duration without significantly affecting motor block. Fentanyl delayed the first analgesic requirement, whereas midazolam reduced postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective analgesics with minimal side effects are imperative for patient and neonate wellbeing postpartum. Post-caesarean section ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have proven safety and efficacy. Surgical TAP blocks appear effective and require little time and equipment. No previous examination of surgical TAP blocks in patients having undergone emergency caesarean section has been undertaken. AIMS: To investigate surgical TAP block and multimodal analgesic use during emergency caesarean section, the effect on surgical time, post-operative analgesia use, and admission length. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 250 patients who underwent emergency caesarean in 2022. Surgical TAP blocks were performed with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine either side. Primary outcomes included surgical time, length of admission, time to first request of rescue opiate, opiate use in first post-operative 24 h, total dose used during admission, and opiates prescribed on discharge. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients received surgical TAP blocks, and 154 did not. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients who did not receive intrathecal morphine, body mass index over 30 kg/m2, for patients whom this was their first caesarean, and for TAP blocks versus local infiltration to the wound. There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes in these subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical TAP blocks did not prolong surgical time or decrease post-operative analgesia use or admission length in patients having undergone emergency caesarean. Patient-tailored multimodal analgesia is encouraged, although more research is needed.

RESUMEN

Introduction: After caesarean section a uterine niche can be detected in 42-84% of all women and in 11-45% large defects with a residual myometrium < 2.2 mm occur. If the niche compromises > 50% of myometrial thickness, risk of uterine rupture during birth increases. The suturing technique might contribute substantially on pathogenesis of niches. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the suturing technique on niche prevalence by using a standardized two-layer surgical technique. Methods: Women with one previous caesarean section were examined within 6-23 months after caesarean section using contrast medium-supported transvaginal sonography regarding the prevalence, sonomorphological aspect and clinical symptoms of a uterine niche. The surgical technique used was: dilatation of the cervix, interrupted suture of the first layer (excluding the endometrium), continuous closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum. Results: Using native vaginal sonography, no niches were visible in the whole cohort. In three cases, there was a small niche detectable with a depth between 2.3 and 3.9 mm by contrast hysterosonography. Regarding the total myometrial thickness, the niche depth compromised less than 50%. All patients were symptom-free. Conclusion: In our study population, there were only three cases (9.1%) with a small uterine niche. Residual myometrium and niche percentage on myometrial thickness were excellent in all three cases. Thus, our results show that the uterotomy closure technique used in the study cohort might be superior with respect to the development of uterine niches compared with the expected prevalence.