Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pathogens ; 12(7)2023 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37513808

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe a colistin (COL)-resistant (R) Chromobacterium violaceum (Cvi) isolate from a septic patient in Argentina expressing a previously unknown gene, blaCVI-1. METHODS: In 2019, a 12 year old child was injured with a thorn in a lagoon. The child was hospitalized due to sepsis and multiple abscesses. Cvi was isolated from skin and soft tissue and tracheal aspirate. The patient was successfully treated with imipenem (IMI) plus amikacin. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and the E-test. Carbapenemase activity was assayed by double-disk synergy and microbiological tests. Resistance, virulence, and additional gene searches were performed by in silico analysis of sequences obtained by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was built with public Cvi genomes. RESULTS: R was seen for IMI and COL. Expression of a metallo-ß-lactamase was confirmed. Genome analysis revealed blaCVI-1, a subclass B2 metallo-ß-lactamase with 62.66% ID with CphA from A. hydrophila (WP081086394). R to COL could be attributed to the arnC and arnT genes. Virulence factors required for invasion and toxicity were also found. No plasmids were detected. The phylogeny tree showed two main clades with geographical distinction, and the isolate studied here stands alone in a branch closely related to two clinical isolates from the USA. CONCLUSIONS: This is the second report of infection by Cvi in Argentina. This pathogen carried a new gene, blaCVI-1, a metallo-ß-lactamase that can be detected by routine methods. Prompt suspicion of C. violaceum infection is crucial to treating this rare pathogen rapidly and properly.

2.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 57(6): 547-554, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36745015

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Two-year follow-up results from a first-in-human study of patients implanted with the VenoValve are evaluated for supporting the long-term clinical safety and performance of the device. BACKGROUND: Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI) involves improper functioning of lower limb vein valves and inability of these valves to move blood back towards the heart. CVI symptoms include swelling, varicose veins, pain, and leg ulcers. Currently, there is no cure for this condition and treatment options are limited. This study provides 2-year outcomes for 8 patients who were implanted with the bioprosthetic VenoValve for treating severe CVI with deep venous reflux measured at the mid-popliteal vein. The 6-month and 1-year results were previously published. METHODS: Eleven patients with C5 & C6 CVI were implanted with VenoValve into the midthigh femoral vein and followed for 2 years. Assessed clinical outcomes include device-related adverse events, reflux time, disease severity, and pain scores. RESULTS: All 11 implant procedures were successful. Two-year follow-up data was obtained for 8 subjects: 1 patient died of non-device related causes, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 1 refused to follow-up due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No device-related adverse events occurred between the first and second years of follow-up. Reported 2-year clinical performance outcomes included significant decreases in mean reflux times of the mid-popliteal vein (61%), and significant improvements in mean scores for disease severity rVCSS (56%) and VAS pain (87%). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study support long-term safety and effectiveness of the VenoValve for improving CVI severity by reducing reflux and thereby venous pressures in the lower extremities. With limited treatments for valvular incompetence involved in severe, deep venous CVI, the device may be considered as a novel therapy. A pivotal trial in the United States is currently being conducted to assess the device in a larger number of patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Insuficiencia Venosa , Válvulas Venosas , Humanos , Válvulas Venosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvulas Venosas/cirugía , Pandemias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/etiología , Insuficiencia Venosa/cirugía , Vena Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Femoral/cirugía , Dolor , Enfermedad Crónica
3.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 10(5): 1172-1183.e5, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35364302

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive techniques have been increasingly used to treat pathologic perforator veins (PVs). The goal of the present study was to summarize the current literature and determine the outcomes of treating PVs with or without the great saphenous vein/small saphenous vein using endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (USGS). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on the percutaneous treatment of PVs (35 studies) was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. Studies reported up to March 2020 were included. The incidence of several end points at different follow-up periods were calculated according to the availability of data within 3 to 12 months after the index procedure. RESULTS: Of the 35 studies, 15 (n = 1677) had reported on EVLA with or without sclerotherapy and/or microphlebectomy, 12 (n = 1477) had investigated the outcomes of RFA ablation with/without sclerotherapy, and 8 (n = 331) had investigated USGS alone. All techniques were safe in terms of periprocedural adverse events, with only a few complications occurring in each group. Immediate procedural success (within 30 days) was 95% in the EVLA group, 91% in the RFS group, and 58% to 70% in the USGS group. At 12 months of follow-up, the occlusion rates were 89%, 77%, and 83% in the EVLA, RFA, and USGS groups, respectively. The 12-month pooled estimate of ulcer healing between the EVLA and RFA groups was similar, although no direct comparisons were performed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PVs with percutaneous techniques, such as EVLA, RFA, and USGS, is safe and associated with high technical success. EVLA and RFA exhibited the most favorable outcomes. Additional research is needed to validate these results, which were based on the limited level of evidence available to better determine the most optimal treatment approach for lower limb pathologic PVs.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Terapia por Láser , Várices , Insuficiencia Venosa , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Safena/cirugía , Escleroterapia/efectos adversos , Escleroterapia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Várices/diagnóstico por imagen , Várices/cirugía , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/etiología , Insuficiencia Venosa/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA