RESUMEN

Neurocysticercosis is predominantly a disease in tropical countries. However, with increasing migration, it is now more frequently reported in developed countries as well. We are reporting a case of new-onset seizures due to underlying neurocysticercosis in a 31-year-old male migrant patient. Initial imaging revealed two cystic lesions in the left parietal lobe and another small lesion in the right parietal lobe. The imaging findings were highly suggestive of neurocysticercosis. Our case highlights the important issue of neurocysticercosis as an etiology for new-onset seizures in the United States.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous contrast injection protocol for certain CT studies at our institution was revised in June 2022 in response to the global shortage of iohexol. This included CT head studies performed for neuro-navigation (contrast dose from 90 mL to 70 mL). The quality of these studies was assessed. METHODS: Consecutive CT scans before (n = 32) and after (n = 32) contrast dose reduction were reviewed. Demographic data was obtained from the chart. Subjective observations made by two radiologists in consensus included overall study quality (Likert scale of 1 to 5) and lesion location, margins and internal characteristics that were compared with MRI findings (reference standard) using Fisher's exact test. Superior sagittal sinus attenuation, used as an objective measurement of enhancement, and lesion size were compared using Student's t-test. The institutional database was searched for any study requiring repetition or deemed non-diagnostic. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The average age (61.1 ± 12.7 years and 61.6 ± 14.9 years) and body surface area (BSA) (1.9 ± 0.3 m2 and 1.9 ± 0.02 m2) was not significantly different (p > 0.05) between groups. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in objective or subjective enhancement between the two groups. There was no significant difference between CT and MRI for lesion size, location, number, margins and internal enhancement characteristics in the two groups. No study required repetition or was reported as non-diagnostic. There was no adverse comment about study quality in operative notes. CONCLUSION: Reduced contrast dose neuro-navigation CT head studies are not different in quality compared to the conventional studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and importance: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a frequent presentation in Emergency Department (ED). There are standardised guidelines, the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR), for CT scan in mTBI that rule out patients on either anticoagulant or anti-platelet therapy. All patients with these therapies undergo a CT scan irrespectively of other consideration. Objective: To determine whether standard guidelines could be applied to patients on anticoagulants or anti-platelet drugs. Design settings and participants: 1,015 patients with mTBI and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 15 were prospectively recruited, 509 either on anticoagulant or anti-platelet therapy and 506 on neither. All patients on neither therapy underwent CT scan following guidelines. All patients with mTBI on either therapy underwent CT scan irrespective of the guidelines. Outcome measure and analysis: Primary endpoint was the incidence of post-traumatic intracranial bleeding in patients either on anticoagulants or anti-platelet drugs and in patients who were not on these therapies. Bayesian statistical analysis with calculation of Confidence Intervals (CI) was then performed. Main results: Sixty scans were positive for bleeding: 59 patients fulfilled the criteria and 1 did not. Amongst patients with haemorrhage, 24 were on either therapy and only one did not meet the guidelines but in this patient the CT scan was performed before 2 h from the mTBI. Patients on either therapy did not have higher bleeding rates than patients on neither. There were higher bleeding rates in patients on anti-platelet therapy who met the guidelines vs. patients who did not. These rates overlapped with patients on neither therapy, meeting CCHR. Conclusion: The CCHR might be used for mTBI patients on either therapy. Anticoagulants and anti-platelet drugs should not be considered a risk factor for patients with mTBI and a GCS of 15. Multicentric studies are needed to confirm this result.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of multiple international guidelines in selecting patients for head CT prior to lumbar puncture (LP) in suspected meningitis, focusing on identification of potential contraindications to immediate LP. METHODS: Retrospective study of 196 patients with suspected meningitis presenting to an emergency department between March 2013 and March 2023 and undergoing head CT prior to LP. UK Joint Specialist Society Guidelines (UK), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines were evaluated by cross-referencing imaging criteria with clinical characteristics present at time of presentation. Sensitivity of each guideline for recommending neuroimaging in cases with brain shift on CT was evaluated, along with the number of normal studies and incidental or spurious findings. RESULTS: 2/196 (1%) patients had abnormal CTs with evidence of brain shift, while 14/196 (7%) had other abnormalities on CT without brain shift. UK, ESCMID and IDSA guidelines recommended imaging in 10%, 14% and 33% of cases respectively. All three guidelines recommended imaging pre-LP in 2/2 (100%) cases with brain shift. IDSA guidelines recommended more CT studies with normal findings (59 vs 16 and 24 for UK and ESCMID guidelines respectively) and CT abnormalities without brain shift (4 vs 1 and 2 respectively) than the other guidelines. CONCLUSION: UK, ESCMID and IDSA guidelines are all effective at identifying the small cohort of patients who benefit from a head CT prior to LP. Following the more selective UK/ESCMID guidelines limits the number of normal studies and incidental or spurious CT findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Strategies to enhance clinicians' adherence to validated imaging decision rules and increase the appropriateness of imaging remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of various implementation strategies for increasing clinicians' use of five validated imaging decision rules (Ottawa Ankle Rules, Ottawa Knee Rule, Canadian C-Spine Rule, National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study and Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule). DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were experimental, quasi-experimental study designs comprising randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials, and single-arm trials (i.e. prospective observational studies) of implementation interventions in any care setting. The search encompassed electronic databases up to March 11, 2024, including MEDLINE (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias of studies independently using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC) risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was clinicians' use of decision rules. Secondary outcomes included imaging use (indicated, non-indicated and overall) and knowledge of the rules. RESULTS: We included 22 studies (5-RCTs, 1-non-RCT and 16-single-arm trials), conducted in emergency care settings in six countries (USA, Canada, UK, Australia, Ireland and France). One RCT suggested that reminders may be effective at increasing clinicians' use of Ottawa Ankle Rules but may also increase the use of ankle radiography. Two RCTs that combined multiple intervention strategies showed mixed results for ankle imaging and head CT use. One combining educational meetings and materials on Ottawa Ankle Rules reduced ankle injury imaging among ED physicians, while another, with similar efforts plus clinical practice guidelines and reminders for the Canadian CT Head Rule, increased CT imaging for head injuries. For knowledge, one RCT suggested that distributing guidelines had a limited short-term impact but improved clinicians' long-term knowledge of the Ottawa Ankle Rules. CONCLUSION: Interventions such as pop-up reminders, educational meetings, and posters may improve adherence to the Ottawa Ankle Rules, Ottawa Knee Rule, and Canadian CT Head Rule. Reminders may reduce non-indicated imaging for knee and ankle injuries. The uncertain quality of evidence indicates the need for well-conducted RCTs to establish effectiveness of implementation strategies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging has undergone unprecedented innovation and advancement, sparking a revolutionary transformation in healthcare. The field of radiology is particularly implicated, as clinical radiologists are expected to interpret an ever-increasing number of complex cases in record time. Machine learning software purchased by our institution is expected to help our radiologists come to a more prompt diagnosis by delivering point-of-care quantitative analysis of suspicious findings and streamlining clinical workflow. This paper explores AI's impact on neuroradiology, an area accounting for a substantial portion of recent radiology studies. We present a case series evaluating an AI software's performance in detecting neurovascular findings, highlighting five cases where AI interpretations differed from radiologists' assessments. Our study underscores common pitfalls of AI in the context of CT head angiograms, aiming to guide future AI algorithms.  Methods We conducted a retrospective case series study at Stony Brook University Hospital, a large medical center in Stony Brook, New York, spanning from October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, analyzing 140 randomly sampled CT angiograms using AI software. This software assessed various neurovascular parameters, and AI findings were compared with neuroradiologists' interpretations. Five cases with divergent interpretations were selected for detailed analysis. Results Five representative cases in which AI findings were discordant with radiologists' interpretations are presented with diagnoses including diffuse anoxic ischemic injury, cortical laminar necrosis, colloid cyst, right superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass, and subacute bilateral subdural hematomas. Discussion The errors identified in our case series expose AI's limitations in radiology. Our case series reveals that AI's incorrect interpretations can stem from complexities in pathology, challenges in distinguishing densities, inability to identify artifacts, identifying post-surgical changes in normal anatomy, sensitivity limitations, and insufficient pattern recognition. AI's potential for improvement lies in refining its algorithms to effectively recognize and differentiate pathologies. Incorporating more diverse training datasets, multimodal data, deep-reinforcement learning, clinical context, and real-time learning capabilities are some ways to improve AI's performance in the field of radiology. Conclusion Overall, it is apparent that AI applications in radiology have much room for improvement before becoming more widely integrated into clinical workflows. While AI demonstrates remarkable potential to aid in diagnosis and streamline workflows, our case series highlights common pitfalls that underscore the need for continuous improvement. By refining algorithms, incorporating diverse datasets, embracing multimodal information, and leveraging innovative machine learning strategies, AI's diagnostic accuracy can be significantly improved.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background There is a high prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of paranasal sinuses on CT Head scans performed for all indications. The purpose of this study is to see whether or not such abnormalities are more common in scans performed on patients presenting with headaches when compared with those without headaches. Methods Images of CT scans of the brain of 100 consecutive patients from each of the two study groups (a total of 200 scans) were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of sinus mucosal abnormalities and their Lund-Mackay (LM) scores were calculated. A corrected LM score was also calculated using a correction factor for non-visualized sinuses in some scans and osteomeatal complexes in all scans. Radiological reports for these scans were also reviewed to note whether or not they contained any comments on the sinuses. All the reviewed scans were performed between January 1, 2021 and January 22, 2021. Results In the headache group, 17 patients had an LM score above 4 (which was used as the main cut-off point for this study). In the non-headache group, 16 patients had a score greater than 4. The mean LM score in the headache group was 1.24 and in the non-headache group was 1.4. There has been no significant difference in the comparison when corrected LM scores were used. In the headache group, 22 radiology reports contained comments on the sinuses compared to 11 reports in the non-headache group. Conclusion Results of this study indicate that there is no significant difference in the prevalence of clinically important sinus mucosal abnormalities in patients who had a brain CT for headache when compared with other indications. It was found that radiologists tend to comment on the sinuses more often when the indication was headache. It may be reasonable for radiologists to consider reviewing this practice. This might reduce unnecessary referrals to ENT and, more importantly, avoid missing other reasons for headaches.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Approximately, one in three computed tomography (CT) scans performed for head injury may be avoidable. We evaluate the efficacy of the Canadian CT head rule (CCHR) on head CT imaging in minor head injury (MHI) and its association of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and structural abnormality. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study from May 2018 to October 2019 in the Department of Emergency Medicine, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Kerala. The CCHR is applied to patients with MHIs (GCS 13-15) after initial stabilization and it is ascertained, if they require a non-contrast CT head and imaging is done. For those who do not require CT head as per the CCHR are excluded from this study. After imaging the patients who have a positive finding on CT head are admitted and followed up if they underwent any neurosurgical intervention, those with no findings in CT head are discharged from the hospital. A total of 203 patients were included during study period. Results: A total of 203 patients were included in study with mean age of 49.5 years. Approximately, 70% (142) were male. Sensitivity of CCHR for predicting positive CT finding in the present study sample was 68% and specificity was 42.5%. Conclusion: Canadian CT head rule is a useful tool in the Emergency Department for predicting the requirement of CT in patients with MHI. Canadian CT head rule can reduce the number of CT scans ordered following MHI in ED, thus improving the healthcare costs. How to cite this article: Reddy A, Poonthottathil F, Jonnakuti R, Thomas R. Efficacy of the Canadian CT Head Rule in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Minor Head Injury. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(2):148-151.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Identify the incidence of intracranial haemorrhage in people from residential aged care facilities following falls who had a CT head performed. The secondary objectives were to identify predictor variables for intracranial haemorrhage to inform person-centred shared decision making. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of aged care residents who presented to ED with a triage of fall. Documented evidence of vomiting, headache, external signs of head injury, deviation from baseline neurology and the presence of anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents was reviewed. The rates of CT head, intracranial haemorrhage, emergent interventions, disposition and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 2546 presentations, 1732 (68.0%) had a CT head and intracranial haemorrhage was found in 76 (4.4%) patients. External signs of head injury and deviation from neurological baseline have a strong association with intracranial haemorrhage in 26 (22.2%) patients, only 4 (0.61%) patients with intracranial haemorrhage had neither. There was a strong association between these clinical features and identification of intracranial haemorrhage on CT head. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet use had no association with intracranial haemorrhage. A 30-day mortality was increased in patients with deviation from neurological baseline. No neurosurgical intervention was performed, and there was inconsistent advice regarding anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents. CONCLUSIONS: Deviation from neurological baseline or external signs of head injury may be predictors of intracranial haemorrhage. Vomiting, headache, anticoagulation or antiplatelets were not associated with intracranial haemorrhage. A person-centred decision-making approach, that is informed by treatment options could better guide clinicians on when to order a CT head after a fall.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires rapid management to avoid secondary injury or death. This study evaluated if a simple schema for quickly interpreting CT head (CTH) imaging by trauma surgeons and trainees could be validated to predict need for neurosurgical intervention (NSI) or death from TBI within 24 hours. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed TBI patients presenting to our trauma center in 2020 with blunt mechanism and GCS ≤ 12. Primary independent variables were presence of 7 normal findings on CTH (CSF at foramen magnum, open fourth ventricle, CSF around quadrigeminal plate, CSF around cerebral peduncles, absence of midline shift, visible sulci/gyri, and gray-white differentiation). Trauma surgeons and trainees separately evaluated each patient's CTH, scoring findings as normal or abnormal. Primary outcome was NSI/death in 24 hours. RESULTS: Our population consisted of 444 patients; 21.4% received NSI or died within 24 hours. By trainees' interpretation, 5.8% of patients without abnormal findings had NSI/death vs 52.0% of patients with ≥1 abnormality; attending interpretation was 8.7% and 54.9%, respectively (P < .001). Sulci/gyri effacement, midline shift, and cerebral peduncle effacement maximized sensitivity and specificity for predicting NSI/death. Considering pooled results, when ≥1 of those 3 findings was abnormal, sensitivity was 77.89%, specificity was 80.80%, positive predictive value was 52.48%, and negative predictive value was 93.07%. DISCUSSION: Any single abnormality in this schema significantly predicted a large increase in NSI/death in 24 hours in TBI patients, and three particular findings were most predictive. This schema may help predict need for intervention and expedite management of moderate/severe TBI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore the unique impact the first COVID-19 national lockdown in New Zealand (NZ) had on the utility of computed tomography (CT)-head scanning in patients presenting to the ED with head injuries. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of CT-head use in head-injured patients presenting to the ED during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown compared to the corresponding time period in 2019. RESULTS: During the lockdown period in 2020, the total number of ED presentations reduced by 30.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.8-31.6) from 13 477 to 9403. The total number of head injury presentations also reduced by 32% (95% CI 27-36.7) from 523 to 356. The proportion of head-injured patients remained similar (3.9% [n = 523] in 2019 vs 3.8% [n = 356] in 2020). Of the head injured patients, 185 (51.9%, 95% CI 44.5-59.4) had CT-head scans performed in 2020 compared to 269 (51.4%, 95% CI 45.2-57.5) in 2019; a reduction of 31.2% (95% CI 24.5-37.9). The proportion of patients who had a CT-head scan remained similar (51.4% [95% CI 45.2-57.5] in 2019 vs 51.9% [95% CI 44.5-59.4] in 2020). There were no significant differences in the proportion of CT-head scans with acute traumatic pathology (13.0% [95% CI 8.7-17.3] in 2019 vs 12.4% [95% CI 7.4-17.5] in 2020, P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: During the first COVID-19 lockdown in NZ, the total number of patients presenting to the ED decreased by one third. Reassuringly, the proportion of patients who presented with head injuries, had a CT-head scan performed, and had positive CT-head findings remained the same as the previous year.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several validated decision rules are available for clinicians to guide the appropriate use of imaging for patients with musculoskeletal injuries, including the Canadian CT Head Rule, Canadian C-Spine Rule, National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) guideline, Ottawa Ankle Rules and Ottawa Knee Rules. However, it is unclear to what extent clinicians are aware of the rules and are using these five rules in practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of clinicians that are aware of five imaging decision rules and the proportion that use them in practice. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: This was a systematic review conducted in accordance with the 'Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses' (PRISMA) statement. We performed searches in MEDLINE (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science and Scopus databases to identify observational and experimental studies with data on the following outcomes among clinicians related to five validated imaging decision rules: awareness, use, attitudes, knowledge, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Where possible, we pooled data using medians to summarise these outcomes. RESULTS: We included 39 studies. Studies were conducted in 15 countries (e.g. the USA, Canada, the UK, Australasia, New Zealand) and included various clinician types (e.g. emergency physicians, emergency nurses and nurse practitioners). Among the five decision rules, clinicians' awareness was highest for the Canadian C-Spine Rule (84%, n = 3 studies) and lowest for the Ottawa Knee Rules (18%, n = 2). Clinicians' use was highest for NEXUS (median percentage ranging from 7 to 77%, n = 4) followed by Canadian C-Spine Rule (56-71%, n = 7 studies) and lowest for the Ottawa Knee Rules which ranged from 18 to 58% (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that awareness of the five imaging decision rules is low. Changing clinicians' attitudes and knowledge towards these decision rules and addressing barriers to their implementation could increase use.

RESUMEN

Aims and Objective: Purpose of this research was to check the precision of gender identification using computed tomography (CT) head and neck scans and volumetric analysis of the maxillary sinus. Materials and Methods: For 50 patients (25 females and 25 males), left and right maxillary sinus scans were acquired, and linear measurements (width, length, height, and volume) were assessed. Both maxillary sinus measurements' means and standard deviations were computed and contrasted. Results: Males have been found to have considerably larger maxillary sinuses than females. Conclusion: Accurate gender determination is possible with the use of maxillary sinus.

RESUMEN

Silicone oil is used as a long-term treatment agent for intraocular tamponade to repair retinal detachments following vitrectomy. Retrolaminar migration of oil into the optic nerve is a rare complication, with migration into the optic chiasm being even more rare. Following imaging, this entity can be misdiagnosed as acute hemorrhage, aneurysm, or neoplasm on imaging possibly leading to delay of care or unnecessary interventions. We will discuss a case where the imaging findings were thought to represent a small acute subarachnoid hemorrhage possibly related to an aneurysm involving the distal right internal carotid artery.

RESUMEN

Objective: Weakness in older emergency department (ED) patients presents a broad differential. Evaluation of these patients can be challenging, and the efficacy of head computed tomography (CT) imaging is unclear. This study assesses the usefulness of head CT as a diagnostic study of acute generalized weakness in older ED patients. Methods: This retrospective review of patients aged 65 years and older presenting to 2 community EDs included patients with a chief complaint of generalized weakness who received a head CT. Patients presenting with a focal neurologic complaint, altered mental status, or trauma were excluded. Variables evaluated included additional triage chief complaints, dementia diagnosis, and deficits on physical examination. Primary outcome was acute intracranial finding on head CT. Secondary outcomes included neurology consultation, neurosurgical consultation, and neurosurgical intervention. Results: Of 247 patients, 3.2% had an acute intracranial abnormality on head CT. Emergent consultations for neurology and neurosurgery occurred for 1.6% and 2.4% of patients, respectively. None required neurosurgical intervention. Patients with objective weakness or focal neurologic deficits on physical examination were more likely to have acute findings on head CT (8.5% vs. 2.0%, odds ratio 4.56, confidence interval 1.10-18.95). Additional characteristics did not predict acute intracranial abnormality or need for emergent consultation. Conclusion: Few patients with generalized weakness evaluated with head CT had acutely abnormal intracranial findings. Patients with objective weakness or neurologic deficits were more likely to have acute abnormalities. Although head CT is frequently used to evaluate geriatric weakness, its utility is low, especially in patients with normal physical examinations.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to provide clinically-relevant insights into establishing CT DRLs based on indication-based protocols in Ireland, focusing on CT head examinations performed at a neurology centre of excellence hospital. METHODS: Dose data were collected retrospectively. Typical values for six CT head indication-based protocols were established using a sample size of 50 patients for each protocol. Typical values for each protocol were set as the median of the distribution curve. Dose distributions for each protocol were calculated and compared using non-parametric median test (k-samples) to ascertain significant dose differences between the typical values. RESULTS: Most typical values pairings showed significant differences (p < 0.001) except between stroke/non-vascular brain, stroke/acute brain, and acute brain/non-vascular brain pairings. This was expected due to similar scan parameters. The typical value for stroke (3-phases angiogram) was 52% lower than the typical value for stroke. Dose levels of the male populations recorded were higher than female populations for all protocols. Statistical comparison showed significant differences for dose quantities and/or scan length between both genders in five protocols. CONCLUSION: Proposed values for DLP were up to 63% and 69% lower than the EU and Irish national DRLs respectively. Establishment of CT stroke DRLs should be based on the scan performed instead of number of scan acquisitions. Lastly, gender-based CT DRLs for specific protocols within the head region require further investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: With increasing CT examinations worldwide, radiation dose optimisation is key. The value of indication based DRLs is to enhance the required patient protection so image quality can be maintained, however with relevant DRLs for varying protocols. Establishment of CT typical values and site specific DRLs for procedures beyond the national DRLs can drive dose optimisation locally.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) is one of many established guidelines for assessing the need for computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with minor head injuries. Adhering to such criteria would promote the appropriate use of CT imaging, lower healthcare expenses, and prevent harmful radiation exposure. There is no current literature assessing the overuse of CT imaging for minor head injuries in the Kingdom of Bahrain. This study aims to evaluate CT overuse in adult patients with minor head trauma.  Methods: The study was conducted at the Bahrain Defense Force Hospital over 12 months from January to December 2021. All adult patients (>14 years) who sustained a minor head injury and were referred to the emergency department for CT brain imaging were included in the study. Patients presenting for other reasons or suffering from moderate to severe head injuries were excluded. CT reports were retrieved for analysis. The CCHR was used as a reference.  Results: A total of 486 CT scans were performed. Loss of consciousness was the most common symptom on presentation (n = 74 cases). Only 12.1% of CT scans reported positive findings. The prevalence of CT overuse was highest in patients aged 21-30 years. Patients presenting with loss of consciousness showed a high overuse of CT imaging, accounting for 20.3% of all cases. Only 77.4% of cases met the CCHR criteria and 22.6% were defined as overuse, with 95% confidence interval (0.189, 0.266).  Conclusion: When referring to the CCHR, CT imaging for a minor head injury in adults was overused in 22.6% of cases. Further research will be required to reveal the underlying reasons for these findings along with interventions to reduce future overuse.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: CT head is commonly performed in the setting of delirium and altered mental status (AMS), with variable yield. We aimed to evaluate the yield of CT head in hospitalized patients with delirium and/or AMS across a variety of clinical settings and identify factors associated with abnormal imaging. METHODS: We included studies in adult hospitalized patients, admitted to the emergency department (ED) and inpatient medical unit (grouped together) or the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients had a diagnosis of delirium/AMS and underwent a CT head that was classified as abnormal or not. We searched Medline, Embase and other databases (informed by PRISMA guidelines) from inception until November 11, 2021. Studies that were exclusively performed in patients with trauma or a fall were excluded. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed; the pooled proportion of abnormal CTs was estimated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was determined via the I2 statistic. Factors associated with an abnormal CT head were summarized qualitatively. RESULTS: Forty-six studies were included for analysis. The overall yield of CT head in the inpatient/ED was 13% (95% CI: 10.2%-15.9%) and in ICU was 17.4% (95% CI: 10%-26.3%), with considerable heterogeneity (I2 96% and 98% respectively). Heterogeneity was partly explained after accounting for study region, publication year, and representativeness of the target population. Yield of CT head diminished after year 2000 (19.8% vs. 11.1%) and varied widely depending on geographical region (8.4%-25.9%). The presence of focal neurological deficits was a consistent factor that increased yield. CONCLUSION: Use of CT head to diagnose the etiology of delirium and AMS varied widely and yield has declined. Guidelines and clinical decision support tools could increase the appropriate use of CT head in the diagnostic etiology of delirium/AMS.

Asunto(s)