RESUMEN
Introducción: cuando un individuo es hospitalizado en UCI para control y monitorización permanente de su salud, su cuidado está orientado específicamente a la asistencia plena de médicos y personal de enfermería. La complejidad de estos cuidados genera una crisis situacional y emocional en la familia que causa ansiedad, estrés, miedo y duda. La forma en la que el enfermero intervenga con el familiar en situaciones críticas es lo que va a determinar la percepción de los mismos hacia el cuidado de enfermería, en tanto la comunicación y el apoyo emocional forma parte de la competencia profesional y contribuye al cuidado holístico del paciente y familia. Objetivo: Determinar la percepción de los familiares de pacientes, respecto a la comunicación que le brinda el profesional de enfermería en la unidad de cuidados críticos. Materiales y método: Se realizó un estudio de tipo cuantitativo, descriptivo y de corte transversal. La muestra estuvo constituida por 40 familiares adultos responsables del paciente hospitalizado en la unidad de terapia intensiva, durante los meses Junio - septiembre del 2023. El instrumento de recolección de información fue un cuestionario de "Percepción de los familiares de los Pacientes Críticos, respecto a la intervención de Enfermería durante su Crisis Situacional"; el mismo fue utilizado y validado por la autora Franco Canales Rosa aplicado en el Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati, Abril de 2003. Resultados:Los resultados muestran que la percepción global de los familiares, es favorable, respecto a la comunicación verbal, comunicación no verbal y el apoyo emocional[AU]
Introduction: health is the condition in which every living being enjoys absolute well-being both physically and mentally and socially, when it is affected either by a pathology or by general accidents; Given the physical condition of the individual, he or she is often hospitalized in the ICU for permanent control and monitoring. Your care is specifically oriented towards the full assistance of Doctors and Nurses. The complexity of this care generates a situational and emotional crisis in the immediate family that causes anxiety, stress, fear and doubt. The way in which the nurse supports the family member in critical or distressing situations is what will determine the perception of the family members towards the nurses, since communication and emotional support are part of the professional competence and contribute to the holistic care of the patient. patient and family. It is a care that is reflected in the feeling that the nurses have that when they do it, the families are very grateful and that, without a doubt, it is their job. Objective: Determine the perception of the patient's relatives regarding the communication provided by the nursing professional in the critical care unit of a private institution. Materials and Methods: A quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out. The sample was made up of 40 adult relatives responsible for the patient hospitalized in the Adult intensive care unit, during the months of June - September 2023. The information collection instrument was a questionnaire on "Perception of relatives of Critical Patients, regarding to Nursing intervention during their Situational Crisis"; It was used and validated by the author Franco Canales Rosa applied at the Edgardo Rebagliati National Hospital, April 2003. Results:The results show that the overall perception of family members is favorable, regarding verbal communication, non-verbal communication and emotional support[AU]
Introdução: saúde é a condição em que todo ser vivo goza de absoluto bem-estar tanto físico quanto mental e social, quando é acometido por alguma patologia ou por acidentes gerais; Dada a condição física do indivíduo, muitas vezes ele é internado em UTI para controle e monitoramento permanente. O seu atendimento é especificamente orientado para a assistência integral de Médicos e Enfermeiros. A complexidade desse cuidado gera uma crise situacional e emocional na família imediata que causa ansiedade, estresse, medo e dúvidas. A forma como o enfermeiro apoia o familiar em situações críticas ou angustiantes é o que determinará a percepção dos familiares em relação aos enfermeiros, uma vez que a comunicação e o apoio emocional fazem parte da competência profissional e contribuem para o cuidado holístico do paciente. paciente e família. É um cuidado que se reflete no sentimento que os enfermeiros têm de que quando o fazem as famílias ficam muito gratas e que, sem dúvida, é o seu trabalho. Objetivo: Determinar a percepção dos familiares do paciente quanto à comunicação prestada pelo profissional de enfermagem na unidade de terapia intensiva de uma instituição privada. Materiais e Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo quantitativo, descritivo e transversal. A amostra foi composta por 40 familiares adultos responsáveis pelo paciente internado na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Adulto, durante os meses de junho a setembro de 2023. O instrumento de coleta de informações foi um questionário sobre "Percepção dos familiares de Pacientes Críticos, quanto à intervenção de Enfermagem durante a sua crise situacional"; Foi utilizado e validado pelo autor Franco Os resultados mostram que a percepção geral dos familiares é favorável, no que diz respeito à comunicação verbal, à comunicação não verbal e ao apoio emocional.Canales Rosa apl i c a d o n o Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati, abril de 2003. Resultados: Os resultados mostram que a percepção geral dos familiares é favorável, no que diz respeito à comunicação verbal, à comunicação não verbal e ao apoio emocional.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Competencia Profesional , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Comunicación no VerbalRESUMEN
Resumo Enquadramento: As ambulâncias de suporte imediato de vida (SIV) possibilitam ao enfermeiro capacidade de intervenção em contexto pré-hospitalar, suportada pelo seu conhecimento técnico-científico, protocolos complexos de atuação e regulação médica por telemedicina. Objetivo: Analisar os contributos da intervenção dos enfermeiros SIV, na evolução do estado clínico da pessoa em situação crítica (PSC). Metodologia: Estudo quantitativo, descritivo-correlacional, retrospetivo, realizado em meios SIV, na região norte de Portugal. Analisados 574 registos clínicos eletrónicos, entre 01 de novembro e 31 de dezembro de 2019, que correspondem ao mesmo número de pessoas avaliadas. Utilizada a escala National Early Warning Score (NEWS) para avaliar a evolução clínica da PSC. Resultados: Observou-se uma evolução positiva do score NEWS da PSC, após a intervenção do enfermeiro SIV (M = 4,43 ± 3,901 vs 3,34 ± 3,329; sig < 0,001). Em sentido inverso, o risco clínico diminuiu significativamente após a intervenção do enfermeiro. Conclusão: Demonstrou-se a relevância da intervenção do enfermeiro SIV no contexto pré-hospitalar, enquanto garantia de segurança, qualidade e melhoria contínua dos cuidados à PSC.
Abstract Background: Immediate life support (ILS) ambulances allow nurses to intervene in pre-hospital settings, supported by their technical-scientific knowledge and complex protocols of action and regulation through telemedicine. Objective: To analyze the contributions of nursing interventions in the evolution of the clinical state of critical patients. Methodology: Quantitative, descriptive-correlational, retrospective, and observational study conducted in ILS settings in northern Portugal. A total of 574 electronic clinical records were analyzed between 1 November and 31 December 2019, corresponding to the same number of people evaluated. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) was used to assess the clinical evolution of critical patients. Results: There was a positive evolution of the NEWS score of critical patients after the intervention of ILS nurses (M = 4.43 ± 3.901 vs. 3.34 ± 3.329; sig < 0.001). Similarly, the clinical risk of critical patients decreased after the nurse's intervention. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the importance of nurses in prehospital care, as a guarantee of safety, quality, and continuous improvement of care for critical patients.
Resumen Marco contextual: Las ambulancias de soporte vital inmediato (SVI) permiten al personal de enfermería intervenir en un contexto prehospitalario, con el apoyo de sus conocimientos técnico-científicos y de complejos protocolos de actuación y regulación médica a través de la telemedicina. Objetivo: Analizar las aportaciones de la intervención del personal de enfermería del SVI en la evolución del estado clínico de la persona en situación crítica (PSC). Metodología: Estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo-correlacional, retrospectivo, realizado en centros de SVI del norte de Portugal. Se analizaron 574 historias clínicas electrónicas entre el 1 de noviembre y el 31 de diciembre de 2019, correspondientes al mismo número de personas evaluadas. Se utilizó la escala National Early Warning Score (NEWS) para evaluar la evolución clínica de la PSC. Resultados: Se observó una evolución positiva en el score NEWS de la PSC, tras la intervención del personal de enfermería del SVI (M = 4,43 ± 3,901 vs 3,34 ± 3,329; sig < 0,001). Por el contrario, el riesgo clínico disminuyó significativamente tras la intervención del personal de enfermería. Conclusión: Se demostró la relevancia de la intervención del personal de enfermería del SVI en el contexto prehospitalario, como garantía de seguridad, calidad y mejora continua en la atención a la PSC.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Successful organ transplantation in patients with end-stage organ failure improves long-term survival, improves quality of life and reduces costs to the NHS. Despite an increase in the number of deceased organ donors over the last decade, there remains a considerable shortfall of suitable organs available for transplantation. Over half of UK donors are certified dead by neurological criteria following brain stem compression, which leads to severe physiological stress in the donor, combined with a hyperinflammatory state. Brain stem death-related dysfunction is an important reason for poor organ function and hence utilisation. For example, more than 30% of donation after brain stem death cardiac transplant recipients need short-term mechanical cardiac support, reflecting donor heart dysfunction.A small, randomised study previously showed improved outcomes for cardiac transplant recipients if the donor was given simvastatin. SIGNET takes inspiration from that study and hypothesises a potential reduction in damage to the heart and other organs during the period after diagnosis of death and prior to organ retrieval in donors that receive simvastatin. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SIGNET is a multicentre, single-blind, prospective, group sequential, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the benefits of a single high dose of simvastatin given to potential organ donors diagnosed dead by neurological criteria on outcomes in all organ recipients. The trial will run across a minimum of 89 UK sites with a recruitment target of 2600 donors over 4 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: SIGNET received a favourable opinion from the London, Queen Square Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 21/LO/0412) and following approval of substantial amendment 1 in January 2023, the current protocol is version 2 (7 December 2022). Substantial amendment 1 clarified consent procedures and added additional sites and prescribers. Findings from the study will be publicly available and disseminated locally and internationally through manuscript publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations at national and international platforms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11440354.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica , Simvastatina , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Simvastatina/administración & dosificación , Simvastatina/uso terapéutico , Método Simple Ciego , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Reino Unido , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de ÓrganosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The rate of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) in critically ill children worldwide has been estimated at 50%. These children are at risk of multiple organ dysfunction, chronic morbidity, and decreased health related quality of life (HRQL). Pediatric and adult ICU clinical trials suggest that VDD is associated with worse clinical outcomes, although data from supplementation trials are limited and inconclusive. Our group's phase II multicenter dose evaluation pilot study established the efficacy and safety of an enteral weight-based cholecalciferol loading dose to rapidly restore vitamin D levels in critically ill children. METHODS: Our aim is to evaluate the impact of this dosing regimen on clinical outcomes. VITdALIZE-KIDS is a pragmatic, phase III, multicenter, double-blind RCT aiming to randomize 766 critically ill children from Canadian PICUs. Participants are randomized using a 1:1 scheme to receive a single dose at enrollment of enteral cholecalciferol (10,000 IU/kg, max 400,000 IU) or placebo. Eligibility criteria include critically ill children aged newborn (> 37 weeks corrected gestational age) to < 18 years who have blood total 25-hydroxyvitamin D < 50 nmol/L. The primary objective is to determine if rapid normalization of vitamin D status improves HRQL at 28 days following enrollment. The secondary objective is to evaluate the impact of rapid normalization of vitamin D status on multiple organ dysfunction. The study includes additional tertiary outcomes including functional status, HRQL and mortality at hospital discharge and 90 days, PICU and hospital length of stay, and adverse events related to vitamin D toxicity. Additionally, we are performing comprehensive vitamin D speciation and non-targeted metabolite profiling as part of a sub-study for the first 100 participants from whom an enrollment and at least one post-intervention blood and urine sample were obtained. DISCUSSION: The VITdALIZE-KIDS trial is the first phase III, multicenter trial to evaluate whether rapid normalization of vitamin D status could represent a simple, inexpensive, and safe means of improving outcomes following pediatric critical illness. Recruitment was initiated in June 2019 and is expected to continue to March 2026. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03742505. Study first submitted on November 12, 2018 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03742505.
Asunto(s)
Colecalciferol , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Deficiencia de Vitamina D , Vitamina D , Humanos , Método Doble Ciego , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Colecalciferol/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangre , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Adolescente , Canadá , Ensayos Clínicos Pragmáticos como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino , Femenino , Factores de Tiempo , Recién Nacido , Biomarcadores/sangre , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
Objective: To better understand the experience of parents with neonates with congenital heart diseases (CHD) admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in order to identify challenges faced by parents and discover support strategies helpful in positive coping. Study design: Prospective cohort study of parents of neonates with CHD. Parents completed a questionnaire with open ended questions regarding their experience and feeling during the hospitalization within one week of the child discharge from the NICU. Krippendorff's content analysis was used to examine data. Results: Sixty-four parents participated. Three themes were highlighted - Dialectical parental experiences, Suboptimal Parental Experiences and Positive Parental Experiences - describing the state of being and feelings that these parents face. Through this analysis, we were able to develop clinical considerations and identify coping strategies. Conclusion: The understanding of parental experience and challenges when dealing with their child admitted in the NICU is crucial to identify coping strategies to promote adaptation and enhance the development of positive coping mechanisms.
RESUMEN
Background: Stress hyperglycemia is now more common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is strongly associated with poor prognosis. Whether this association exists in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is unknown. This study investigated the prognostic relationship of stress hyperglycemia on critically ill patients with CS. Methods: We included 393 critically ill patients with CS from the MIMIC IV database in this study and categorized the patients into four groups based on quartiles of Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR). We assessed the correlation between SHR and mortality using restricted cubic spline analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. The primary outcomes observed were ICU mortality and hospitalization mortality. Results: The mean age of the entire study population was 68 years, of which 30% were male (118 cases). There was no significant difference between the four groups in terms of age, gender, BMI, and vital signs (P>0.05). There was an increasing trend in the levels of lactate (lac), white blood cell count (WBC), glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST), glucose and Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) from group Q1 to group Q2, with the greatest change in patients in group Q4 (P<0.05) and the patients in group Q4 had the highest use of mechanical ventilation, the longest duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay. After adjusting for confounders, SHR was found to be strongly associated with patient ICU mortality, showing a U-shaped relationship. Conclusion: In critically ill patients with CS, stress hyperglycemia assessed by SHR was significantly associated with patient ICU mortality.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Hiperglucemia , Choque Cardiogénico , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Choque Cardiogénico/sangre , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Hiperglucemia/mortalidad , Hiperglucemia/sangre , Hiperglucemia/complicaciones , Anciano , Pronóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Glucemia/análisis , Glucemia/metabolismo , Estrés FisiológicoRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the critical importance of intensive care units (ICUs), a field institutionalized by Bjørn Ibsen during the 1952 polio epidemic in Copenhagen. Ibsen's groundbreaking innovations, including positive pressure ventilation and real-time physiological monitoring, laid the foundation for modern intensive care medicine. Trained in Denmark and the United States, Ibsen demonstrated the effectiveness of manual ventilation during the polio outbreak after successfully resuscitating a young patient, Vivi Ebert, which in turn led to the creation of the world's first multidisciplinary ICU at Blegdams Hospital. This article explores the historical context and significance of Ibsen's contributions, tracing the evolution of the physiology of breathing from the early concepts of Vesalius and Hook to the widespread application of ventilation techniques. The establishment of the ICU introduced new ethical dilemmas, highlighting the delicate balance between prolonging life and maintaining patient dignity. Ibsen's legacy extends beyond medical advancements to the compassionate care he championed, a principle that remains a cornerstone of modern intensive care. This ethical complexity is a crucial aspect of the history of intensive care medicine.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Anticoagulation therapy aims to improve the outcome of critically ill patients with severe COVID-19-associated pneumonia. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is commonly used to maintain the target therapeutic range of continuous infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH). The UFH infusion efficacy can be evaluated by determining the time in therapeutic range (TTR) using a modified Rosendaal method. The present study's primary aim was to evaluate TTR based on the aPTT in critically ill patients with severe forms of COVID-19 pneumonia and its influence on survival. The secondary aim was to evaluate the time spent above (TATR) and below the therapeutic range (TBTR). Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia. All patients received a continuous infusion of UFH from the 2nd to 8th day since admission to the ICU. TTR, TATR, and TBTR were calculated using the modified Rosendaal method, and survival days were analyzed by regression (censored after 60 days). Results: Of 103 patients, the median TTR was 49% (IQR 38-63%), TATR 11% (IQR 5-20%), and TBTR 33% (IQR 22-51%). The regression analysis indicated a positive impact of higher TTR and TATR on the number of survival days [ß=0.598 (p=0.0367) and ß=1.032 (p=0.0208), respectively] and a negative impact of higher TBTR [ß=-0.681 (p=0.0033)] on the number of survival days. Conclusion: Higher TTR and TATR were associated with better survival of critically ill patients with a severe course of COVID-19-associated pneumonia. Higher TBTR was associated with worse survival in these patients.
RESUMEN
Background: Many factors, such as religion, geography, and customs, influence end-of-life practices. This variability exists even between different physicians. Objective: To observe and describe the end-of-life actions of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and document the variables that might influence decision-making at the end of life. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study performed in the ICU patients of a private hospital from March 2017 to March 2022. We used the Philips Tasy Electronic Medical Record database of clinical records; 298 patients were included in the study during these five years (2017-2022). The data analysis was done with the statistical package SPSS version 23 for Windows. Results: A total of 297 patients were included in this study, of which more than half were men. About 60% of our sample had private health insurance, whereas the remaining paid out of pocket. Most patients had withholding treatment, followed by failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation, withdrawal treatment, and brain death, and none of the patients had acceleration of the dying process. The main cause of admission to the ICU in our center was respiratory complications. Most of our samples were Catholics. Conclusions: Decision-making at the end of life is a complex process. Active participation of the patient, when possible, the patient's family, doctors, and nurses, can give different perspectives and a more compassionate and individualized approach to end-of-life care.
RESUMEN
Critical care medicine has undergone significant evaluation in the 21st century, primarily driven by advancements in technology, changes in healthcare delivery, and a deeper understanding of disease processes. Advancements in technology have revolutionized patient monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment in the critical care setting. From minimally invasive procedures to advances imaging techniques, clinicians now have access to a wide array of tools to assess and manage critically ill patients more effectively. In this editorial we comment on the review article published by Padte S et al wherein they concisely describe the latest developments in critical care medicine.
RESUMEN
This manuscript explores the potential use of Remimazolam in the intensive care unit (ICU) and critical care units, considering its pharmacological characteristics, clinical applications, advantages, and comparative effectiveness over current sedatives and anesthetics. We reviewed existing PubMed and Google Scholar literature to find relevant studies on Remimazolam in ICU. We created search criteria using a combination of free text words, including Remimazolam, critical care, intensive care, sedation, anesthesia, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Relevant articles published in the English language were analyzed and incorporated. Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine derivative promising for sedation and anesthesia. It is a safer option for hemodynamically unstable, elderly, or liver or kidney issues. It also has comparable deep sedation properties to propofol in the ICU. Furthermore, it reduces post-procedural delirium and patient comfort and reduces the need for additional sedatives in pediatric patients. In conclusion, Remimazolam is an excellent alternative to current sedatives and anesthetics in the ICU. Its cost is comparable to that of current medications. Further research on its long-term safety in the ICU and its broader application and incorporation into routine use is necessary.
RESUMEN
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a structured therapeutic communication module on psychological distress and perceived needs among caregivers of critically ill patients. BACKGROUND: Caregivers of critically ill patients experience intense psychological distress, and their needs often go unexpressed or unidentified. Structured therapeutic communication enables nurses to explore and fulfill these needs. METHOD: A mixed-method study was conducted among 30 caregivers of critically ill patients. During phase one, a qualitative interview was conducted, and a structured therapeutic communication module was developed based on Hildegard Peplau's Interpersonal Relations Theory. In the second phase, one group pre-test and post-test design was adopted. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and a Semi-structured interview schedule were used to assess psychological distress and perceived needs, respectively. RESULTS: Half of (50 %) the caregivers reported a high level of anxiety before intervention, with a mean of 11.30 (SD: 4.0), and 66.7 % of them had a high level of depression, with a mean of 12.03 (SD: 0.08). There was a statistically significant difference in anxiety (CI: 0.451-2.016) and depression (CI: 0.261-1.538) before and after the intervention. The qualitative analysis revealed unmet needs perceived by caregivers. CONCLUSION: Using a structured therapeutic communication module helps nurses to alleviate the psychological distress experienced by caregivers of CCU patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses need to be sensitive to the unexpressed needs of caregivers of critically ill patients. The structured therapeutic communication modules can be integrated into routine nursing care practice to ensure family-centered care.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Comunicación , Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Distrés Psicológico , Humanos , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Cuidadores/psicología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Depresión/psicología , Ansiedad/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Background: Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) often require Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission during the disease trajectory, but aggressive medical treatment has not resulted in increased quality of life for patients or caregivers. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes relevant data thematically exploring the current state of serious illness communication in the ICU with identification of barriers and potential strategies to improve performance. We provide a conceptual model underscoring the importance of providing comprehensible disease and prognosis knowledge, eliciting patient values and aligning these values with available goals of care options through a series of discussions. Achieving effective serious illness communication supports the delivery of goal concordant care (care aligned with the patient's stated values) and improved quality of life. Results: General barriers to effective serious illness communication include lack of outpatient serious illness communication discussions; formalized provider training, literacy and culturally appropriate patient-directed serious illness communication tools; and unoptimized electronic health records. ESLD-specific barriers to effective serious illness communication include stigma, discussing the uncertainty of prognosis and provider discomfort with serious illness communication. Evidence-based strategies to address general barriers include using the Ask-Tell-Ask communication framework; clinician training to discuss patients' goals and expectations; PREPARE for Your Care literacy and culturally appropriate written and online tools for patients, caregivers, and clinicians; and standardization of documentation in the electronic health record. Evidence-based strategies to address ESLD-specific barriers include practicing with empathy; using the "Best-Case, Worst Case" prognostic framework; and developing interdisciplinary solutions in the ICU. Conclusion: Improving clinician training, providing patients and caregivers easy-to-understand communication tools, standardizing EHR documentation, and improving interdisciplinary communication, including palliative care, may increase goal concordant care and quality of life for critically ill patients with ESLD.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Studies integrating an exhaustive longitudinal long-term follow-up of postintensive care syndrome (PICS) in critically ill COVID-19 survivors are scarce. We aimed to 1) describe PICS-related sequelae over a 12-month period after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, 2) identify relevant demographic and clinical factors related to PICS, and 3) explore how PICS-related sequelae may influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in critically ill COVID-19 survivors. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult critically ill survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection that did or did not need invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain (March 2020 to January 2021). We performed a telemedicine follow-up of PICS-related sequelae (physical/functional, cognitive, and mental health) and HRQoL with five data collection points. We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical data. We used multivariable mixed-effects models for data analysis. RESULTS: We included 142 study participants in the final analysis, with a median [interquartile range] age of 61 [53-68] yr; 35% were female and 59% needed IMV. Fatigue/dyspnea, pain, impaired muscle function, psychiatric symptomatology and reduced physical HRQoL were prominent sequelae early after ICU discharge. Over the 12-month follow-up, functionality and fatigue/dyspnea improved progressively, while pain remained stable. We observed slight fluctuations in anxiety symptoms and perception of cognitive deficit, whereas posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive symptoms improved, with a mild rebound at the end of the follow-up. Female sex, younger age, and the need for IMV were risk factors for PICS, while having higher cognitive reserve was a potential protective factor. Physical HRQoL scores showed a general improvement over time, whereas mental HRQoL remained stable. Shorter ICU stay, better functionality, and lower scores for fatigue/dyspnea and pain were associated with better physical HRQoL, while lower scores for anxiety, depression, and PTSD were associated with better mental HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Postintensive care syndrome was common in COVID-19 critical illness survivors and persisted in a significant proportion of patients one year after ICU discharge, impacting HRQoL. The presence of risk factors for PICS may identify patients who are more likely to develop the condition and who would benefit from more specific and closer follow-up after ICU admission. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04422444 ); first submitted 9 June 2020.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les études intégrant un suivi longitudinal exhaustif à long terme des syndromes post-soins intensifs (SPSI) chez les survivant·es gravement malades de la COVID-19 sont rares. Notre objectif était 1) de décrire les séquelles liées au SPSI sur une période de 12 mois après la sortie de l'unité de soins intensifs (USI), 2) d'identifier les facteurs démographiques et cliniques pertinents liés au SPSI, et 3) d'explorer comment les séquelles liées au SPSI peuvent influencer la qualité de vie liée à la santé (QVLS) chez les survivant·es gravement malades de la COVID-19. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte prospective chez des adultes gravement malades survivant·es d'une infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 qui ont eu ou non besoin d'une ventilation mécanique invasive (VMI) pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 en Espagne (mars 2020 à janvier 2021). Nous avons effectué un suivi par télémédecine des séquelles liées au SPSI (santé physique/fonctionnelle, cognitive et mentale) et à la QVLS avec cinq points de collecte de données. Nous avons rétrospectivement colligé des données démographiques et cliniques. Des modèles multivariés à effets mixtes ont été utilisés pour l'analyse des données. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 142 participant·es à l'étude dans l'analyse finale, avec un âge médian [intervalle interquartile] de 61 [53-68] ans; 35 % étaient des femmes et 59 % avaient besoin de VMI. La fatigue/dyspnée, la douleur, l'altération de la fonction musculaire, la symptomatologie psychiatrique et la réduction de la QVLS physique étaient des séquelles importantes peu après la sortie de l'USI. Au cours du suivi de 12 mois, la fonctionnalité et la fatigue/dyspnée se sont améliorées progressivement, tandis que la douleur est restée stable. Nous avons observé de légères fluctuations des symptômes d'anxiété et de perception du déficit cognitif, tandis que le trouble de stress post-traumatique (ESPT) et les symptômes dépressifs se sont améliorés, avec un léger rebond à la fin du suivi. Le sexe féminin, un jeune âge et le besoin de VMI étaient des facteurs de risque de SPSI, tandis qu'une réserve cognitive plus élevée était un facteur potentiel de protection. Les scores physiques de la QVLS ont montré une amélioration générale au fil du temps, tandis que la QVLS mentale est restée stable. Un séjour plus court aux soins intensifs, une meilleure fonctionnalité et des scores plus faibles pour la fatigue/dyspnée et la douleur étaient associés à une meilleure QVLS physique, tandis que des scores plus faibles pour l'anxiété, la dépression et le ESPT étaient associés à une meilleure QVLS mentale. CONCLUSION: Le syndrome post-soins intensifs était fréquent chez les survivant·es d'une maladie grave de la COVID-19 et a persisté chez une proportion importante de patient·es un an après leur sortie de l'unité de soins intensifs, ce qui a eu un impact sur la QVLS. La présence de facteurs de risque de SPSI peut identifier les patient·es qui sont plus susceptibles de développer la maladie et qui bénéficieraient d'un suivi plus spécifique et plus étroit après leur admission aux soins intensifs. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04422444 ); première soumission le 9 juin 2020.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad Crítica , Calidad de Vida , Sobrevivientes , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , España/epidemiología , Respiración Artificial , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
The growing utilization of critical care echocardiography (CCE) by clinicians necessitates a meticulous review of clinical conditions in critically ill patients, both before and during the examination. The reviewing process of clinical conditions minimizes the risk of overlooking or misinterpreting crucial findings. This article proposes a comprehensive strategy, namely BILL strategy to integrated into the CCE protocol, where "B" represents baseline respiratory and hemodynamic support, "I" signifies information gleaned from invasive monitoring, including central venous pressure and thermodilution-derived cardiac output, the first "L" denotes laboratory results such as central venous oxygen saturation, troponin, and brain natriuretic peptide, and the second "L" refers to lung ultrasound data. xx Combining the BILL strategy with CCE enhances a more comprehensive understanding of critical illness, potentially leading to improved diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The field of cardiac surgery in Saudi Arabia has developed significantly over the years, with more advanced procedures being performed for high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities. This poses challenging postoperative management issues requiring multidisciplinary, highly organized expert care in cardiovascular critical care. This survey aimed to describe the current state of postoperative critical care for cardiac surgeries in Saudi Arabia. DESIGN: This e-mail survey developed by the Chapter of Adult Cardiovascular Critical Care of the Saudi Critical Care Society included 61 questions pertaining to the geographic distribution of adult cardiac surgery centers in Saudi Arabia, including what types of operations and how many operations are being performed, and information on intensive care units such as data on staffing, equipment, protocols, and outcome assessment in these units. SETTING: The study was conducted in Saudi Arabia. PARTICIPANTS: Participating physicians included representatives of adult intensive care units in all cardiac centers (N = 42). INTERVENTIONS: There were no interventions in this study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the study cardiac centers, 71.4% have specialized cardiovascular critical care units for the postoperative care of cardiac patients and 42.9% are managed in a closed design by expert in-house physicians on a 24-hour basis. The estimated cardiac surgery intensive care unit bed capacity in Saudi Arabia is 7.3 (ranging from 3.0 in Qasim Region to 11.6 in Mecca Region) beds/1 million population, with 1.3 cardiac centers/1 million and 79 centers/1 million cardiovascular surgical patients. Several protocols are implemented in these critical care units with key performance indicators to meet the best quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac surgery intensive care units in Saudi Arabia have varying management structures, care practices, and healthcare provider staffing models, although most of the large-volume centers are adopting the intensivist-led team model of care. Guidelines are needed to standardize practice in all cardiac surgery centers regarding processes and protocols, intensive care unit staffing models, and reporting of outcomes and key performance indicators. Further studies are needed to study cardiac surgery intensive care unit factors related to patient outcomes after cardiac surgery.
RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, particularly in managing critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation early in the pandemic. Surging patient volumes strained hospital resources and complicated the implementation of standard-of-care intensive care unit (ICU) practices, including sedation management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an evidence-based ICU sedation bundle during the early COVID-19 pandemic. The bundle was designed by a multi-disciplinary collaborative to reinforce best clinical practices related to ICU sedation. The bundle was implemented prospectively with retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data. The setting was the ICUs of a single-center tertiary hospital. The patients were the ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation for confirmed COVID-19 between March and June 2020. A learning health collaborative developed a sedation bundle encouraging goal-directed sedation and use of adjunctive strategies to avoid excessive sedative administration. Implementation strategies included structured in-service training, audit and feedback, and continuous improvement. Sedative utilization and clinical outcomes were compared between patients admitted before and after the sedation bundle implementation. Quasi-experimental interrupted time-series analyses of pre and post intervention sedative utilization, hospital length of stay, and number of days free of delirium, coma, or death in 21 days (as a quantitative measure of encephalopathy burden). The analysis used the time duration between start of the COVID-19 wave and ICU admission to identify a "breakpoint" indicating a change in observed trends. A total of 183 patients (age 59.0 ± 15.9 years) were included, with 83 (45%) admitted before the intervention began. Benzodiazepine utilization increased for patients admitted after the bundle implementation, while agents intended to reduce benzodiazepine use showed no greater utilization. No "breakpoint" was identified to suggest the bundle impacted any endpoint measure. However, increasing time between COVID-19 wave start and ICU admission was associated with fewer delirium, coma, and death-free days (ß = - 0.044 [95% CI - 0.085, - 0.003] days/wave day); more days of benzodiazepine infusion (ß = 0.056 [95% CI 0.025, 0.088] days/wave day); and a higher maximum benzodiazepine infusion rate (ß = 0.079 [95% CI 0.037, 0.120] mg/h/wave day). The evidence-based practice bundle did not significantly alter sedation utilization patterns during the first COVID-19 wave. Sedation practices deteriorated and encephalopathy burden increased over time, highlighting that strategies to reinforce clinical practices may be hindered under conditions of extreme healthcare system strain.
RESUMEN
To date, health disparities in critically ill children have largely been studied within, not across, specific intensive care unit (ICU) settings, thus impeding collaboration which may help advance the care of critically ill children. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize the literature intentionally designed to examine health disparities, across 3 primary ICU settings (neonatal ICU, pediatric ICU, and cardiac ICU) in the United States. We included over 50 studies which describe health disparities across race and/or ethnicity, area-level indices, insurance status, socioeconomic position, language, and distance.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Recién Nacido , Niño , Lactante , Estados Unidos , Preescolar , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) involves surgical removal of the skull that overlies swollen, imperiled, brain. This is done to combat intracranial hypertension and mitigate a vicious cycle of secondary brain injury. If, instead, this pathophysiology goes uninterrupted, it can mean brain herniation and brain stem death. As such, DC can save lives when all else fails. Regardless, it is no panacea and can also "ruin deaths," and leave patients profoundly disabled. DC is not a new procedure; however, this therapy is increasingly noteworthy due to advances in neurocritical care, alongside ethical concerns. We cover the physiological rationale, the surgical basics, the trial data, and focus on secondary decompression (for refractory intracranial pressure (ICP)) rather than primary decompression (i.e. during evacuation of an intracranial mass). Given that DC should not be undertaken indiscriminately, we conclude by introducing ways in which to discuss DC with families and colleagues. Our goal is to provide a primer and common resource for the multidisciplinary team. We aim to increase not only knowledge but wisdom, prudence, collegiality, and family-focused care.